Comments by "AtomicBabel" (@AtomicBabel) on "Drachinifel"
channel.
-
597
-
470
-
261
-
130
-
68
-
62
-
56
-
45
-
44
-
38
-
35
-
32
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@magellali1623 IJN destroyers that were designed for surface action (e.g. Fubuki Class and evolutions) had a full set of reloads (3 x 3) stored in "ready locker" like boxes on the weather deck. After the first salvo, the launcher tubes were cranked over to align with the reload "boxes" and with much sweat the second set was slid into the empty tubes. These destroyers were designed for delivering torpedoes and can dish out 18 of them. Yes, that made them heavy and exposed a lot of combustibles to enemy fire. But the doctrine is to avoid being shot at, dump a spread of 9, reload and dump another 9. During the Solomon campaign, this happened with regularity. Even Tasaforoga, while under fire from radar directed guns, several of the 9 destroyers (those not burdened with rice and bullets), got off the second salvo.
Btw: a spread of 9 was calculated to be the minimum to ensure 1 hit at the doctrinal engagement range. That didn't exactly work out when tested by fire. (Source: Japanese Destroyer Captain, T. Hara, Ballentine Books 1961).
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@aliceosako792 at night, 6 Fleischer's will do, no losses.
Clear day, double it and maybe one lucky strike until the other 11 Fletchers close to Torp range. In both cases, basically, close under cover from optical directed gunnery and shower your target with 5" and torpedoes. That's 60 to 120 torpedoes, good luck.
If you want to picture what can happen, a good reference is the naval battle of guadalcanal, the destroyers got so close to the battleships that return fire was in- effective. A second reference is Samar for how hard it 's to hit a DD with BB guns. Add the Naval battle of Casablanca for the effective use of smoke screens. Lastly, DD trace their lineage to torpedo boats, as in destroyer/ torpedoboat flotilla and their purpose is to close in and sink battleships.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@unlimitedx53 funny, I had some free time and bicycled over to that today. The plate is 26 inches thick. 2 inches from the back side, there is a distinct broader, a transition between ductility and hardness. From the front, there were spider cracks on the surface radiating about 18 inches from the circumference of the hole. The cracks branched out into several fingers. On the face, it appears as if dinner plate sized "flint" shards were ejected, it was difficult to determine exactly how deep this went, it could have been 3 or 4 inches. The core was smeared, pushed in the direction of the shell and the hole was smooth. Next time, I'll measure the diameter of the hole. I was not aware of the effect of "extruding" the penetrating shell to a smaller diameter.
About 10 ft away were 2 APC shells for the 18.1's. 50 ft away were 2 plates and a propeller from the South Dakota. One plate was about 12 inches thick and had cement backing and was stud (3 - 4 inch dia) mounted to a 1 1/2" hull plate. This must be a belt plate. The other plate was about 6 inches thick and looks like it took a non penetrating medium caliber shell hit at a shallow angle. There were radiating scars, all were ductile. Interestingly, there were inch long lines all over the surface of the plate, like giant ice crystals.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Itinery recommendation in north to south order on the east coast:
1) Boston & Falls Cove, USS Massachusetts, USS Constitution, some DD
Drive 4 hours
2) NYC - USS Intrepid, Sailing ships at South Street Seaport.
Drive 3.5 hours
3) Philiadelphia / Camden
USS New Jersey, SS United States, USS Olympia, de-comm'ed reserved fleet.
Drive 2 hours to Baltimore
4) USS Constellation, Fort McHenry
Since 1 hour to DC
5) DC, Smithsonian air and space (both downtown and Dulles... if only anyone can get into Silverhill) Washington Naval Museum, Fort Foote, Fort Washington.
Drive 1.2 hours to Quantico
6) Museum of USMC
Drive 1.2 hours to
7) Jamestown/ Williamsburg
Drive 1 hr to Newport News & Norfolk
Another 3 or 4 hours to USS North Carolina.
Realistically, can you bear more than that?
Yes, I've driven NYC and south legs separately and it actually flows with almost zero detour.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@98LuckyLuk many reasons why hollow charge rounds are not useful in naval combat. Firstly, they don't like high velocity, it messes up the formation of the penetrating jet of plasma. Low velocity = short range. Second, length, the detonator has to be well in front of the charge to effect formation of the jet of plasma, and the faster the round is traveling... back to velocity. Diameter, the penetration is proportional to the diameter of the explosive cone which is limited by the diameter of the gun barrel. Fourth, terminal effect, the explosion is outside and only a jet of plasma penetrates the target, which is good at messing up a small confined interior space. To do damage to the inside of a warship, it is best to deliver the kaboom inside the ship.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@WhisperingDeath you are extremely invested in your quest for and therefore deserve to learn the answer. To do that you will need to let go of some of your assumptions. The biggest is that the attacking force needs to be destroyed, or a hard kill. For that I suggest you think about what is a mission kill or a soft kill. Also, consider for the attacker, what is the probability of a hit and the effectiveness of the hit on the target. How would the P sub H be affected by the target maneuvering, target bearing relative to the attacker and sending shells and bullets. It is a combination of defensive actions, not just kinetics to render the attacker in-effective. You don't need 100 guns and shoot down the entire attacking force. (Here is where I must add that the unhindered P sub H from a weapon release today is very high and even now the defense is both soft and hard kill)
Thus the naval designers of the day (and today) allocate volume, weight and location for defensive systems in accordance with the threat and that allocation means that something else is taken away. Is it perfect? No, the game is threat and counter and if you underestimate the threat, be it from hubris or your enemy came to the game with a superior weapon, the designers were not paying attention, or there was just no budget (not just money, also design budget. You end up with one side having an advantage. Was the air threat taken seriously, yes when it materially became and then recognized as a serious threat, and the navies took steps to increase and improve their AA. The air threat in the late 30s was improving faster (shorter gestation) than ship new design and modernization.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I know that this channel is about much older ships, but I am torn over CVN81 being named for Dorie Miller. I'm very disappointed and would really preferred something grander, like the United States, Constitution, even Challenger. A frigate had been named for Miller, and in my stronge opinion, a decorated service member's namesake should grace frigates and destroyers, NOT a CVN. CVNs are to be named for great leaders, great ships and the grand ideals of the USA. This event is a total surprise and I'm feeling very sad. I guess I picked the right time to quit, at the very lease, there will be an Enterprise.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@arkadeepkundu4729 this is apples & oranges. Let's keep the discussion to the current class of French "frigates". 1) the MN did not use the term "destroyer", itself an evolution of the term "torpedo boat destroyer", they called those ships "contra torpeleurs" (bad spelling) somewhat literally "counter to/ anti torpedo slingers". So MN didn't have a cool term like "destroyers" that apply to other things. (2) for a ship of that size and importance today, the commanding officer should be of O5 rank, a Commander in USN and RN, and for MN, the title of that rank is "Capitain de Frigate", doesn't matter if the officer is actually commanding a frigate or a logistics maintenance unit, a lawyer, an engineering duty officer ashore, or the XO of a bigger ship. That's the name of the rank.
3) now if you are MN and designing a general-purpose ship that's bigger than a corvette, but not a "capitol ship" why not follow your naval tradition and call it a Frigate?
Now looking at the armament specifications, and design mission, it's clearly a frigate. Big and tall, but clearly a frigate.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1