Comments by "" (@TentaclePentacle) on "A Transgender Woman in Academia (Pt. 1) | Deirdre McCloskey | ACADEMIA | Rubin Report" video.

  1. shush, the transformer is talking. Autobots can always transform and rollout, and transform back if they want.
    11
  2. Rubin just interviewed a real life transformer. Stop being so robotphobic.
    8
  3. his wife married a man, not a decepticon.
    5
  4. a post modernist.
    5
  5. What do you have against megatron? You robotphobe!
    4
  6. I did hear that robot out. This decepticon basically said if you don't like your transformation you can always change back. That deserves a downvote for its deceptiveness.
    4
  7. i'm going to call him a decepticon, not on his voice, but on his deceptiveness of trying to convince people that you can change back even after you cut off your penis. Plus he is a post modernist, which raises all kinds of bullshit alarms.
    3
  8. Well when this deception is trying to tell trans people its ok to transition, if you don't like you can always change back, even when you cut off your penis. That's so irresponsible and dangerous.
    3
  9. a postmodern interpretation of accomplishment indeed.
    3
  10. +Mithridate You are still getting confused on what she said. She is for psychiatry (the use of drugs) but singles out the medical doctors that over prescribe drugs. But in general she is ok with psychiatry. She said she is all for the drugs. Oh and yes I did misheard her she doesn't seem to have a problem with psychologists. But my point still stands, she is all for drug interventions. She advocates for surgery over talking, that is the dangerous. Here is an example of her being deceptive. "There is something really important for straight people to understand, no one has regret." And then in the very next sentence "the number of people that have regret is miniscule" Is the number of people who have regret miniscule? Or no one have regret? There is a contradiction right there. "B if they have regret they can change back." - That is a lie you can not change back. "change back you can't grow, a penis, well so what" She thinks having a penis is no big deal, well I'm going to tell you right now a penis is the most important organ to a man. As for abandoning her family. A man does not abandon one's family That is a societal expectation for a man. But she doesn't want to be a man anymore. I guess she can't handle the responsibility of being a man. She did abandon her family, by not wanting to be a man. The family didn't abandon her, because you can't expect any wife to stay with someone when they decided to be a different person. It's his choice to stop being a man so he abandoned his family.
    2
  11. its a decepticon.
    2
  12. so basically a decepticon.
    2
  13. +Thatcher Nap She seems flippant because she thinks she won't change her mind. But there are some who have changed their mind and killed themself because they just can't go back anymore. There is a lot of word play, I can choose to live like a dog if I want. That means nothing. When you cut off your penis, that's a huge change you just can't undo.
    2
  14. I heard this deception lie to people's faces and tell them that cutting off a penis is no big deal, you can always change back if you want. Sorry I'm going to judge this deception base on it's deceptiveness.
    1
  15. +Mithridate if you have been around trans for years, and this decepticon is the most reasonable one you can find? Wow what does that say about the trans. And yes I like my dick I don't want it cut off. By applying the golden rule, I don't want other people to cut it off needlessly either. I have morals, I don't want people to suffer for a political narrative.
    1
  16. +Mithridate Again if you think cutting off penis is reversible as "one of the more reasonable" then what does that say about the other trans? And please learn what the golden rule is. If I don't want my own penis cut off, then I wouldn't wish it on other people. That's the foundation of secular morality. There needs to be more gender dysphoria research done with out politics getting in the way of real science. This "reasonable trans" is also against psychology, a field of science that can actually help trans people. So I don't see this person being reasonable, I see this decepticon as really dangerous.
    1
  17. +Mithridate You did not claim that cutting off penis is reversible, but this decepticon did. All you did was claim that this decepticon is one of the more reasonable ones. I apply the golden rule quite simply. If I don't want something done to me, then its not something that i want done to others. I don't want my penis cut off, so I don't want to encourage others to cut off their penis. Finally, no, go back and watch that video again. She said she is not against psychiatry, as in giving drugs to people. She is against psychology, psychology is therapists talking to people trying to work out their problems with talking. This decepticon is against that. This decepticon is against talking, but want to give trans patients drugs. That is why this decepticon is dangerous, and not reasonable.
    1
  18. +Mithridate Well if you agree with me that cutting off the penis and still being reversible is unreasonable, then how can you still say that this trans is among the reasonable ones? As for the golden rule? I don't want people to encourage me to cut off my penis, so I will not encourage others to cut off their penis. Is that not the essence of the golden rule? This decepticon is against psychology, which means she is against therapy in treating transgenderism. And she is in favor of drugs, surgery and cutting off penis. I don't see the "not all" that she was trying to raise. Her stands is clear, she is pro surgery, pro drugs and anti analysis anti counseling. This makes her very dangerous to other trans. Her rhetoric and stands will encourage other trans to cut off their penis, and cutting it off is irreversible. That is why I said she is not reasonable, but you seem to disagree and think she is among the reasonable ones.
    1
  19. +Mithridate She is saying if you cut off your penis its no big deal, she make it seem like not a big decision to make. That's call unreasonable. That's encourage trans people to toward surgery. As for the psychiatry part, yes she is not against psychiatry (the use of drugs). She is against psychology (the use of therapy). Those are different concepts. She wants trans people to cut off their penis and take hormonal drugs. But she doesn't want trans people to talk to counsellors and seek none invasive drug and surgical treatments. As for the reaction of her family. I don't blame the wife. The wife married a man, and if he doesn't want to be a man anymore, can you blame the wife for leaving?
    1
  20. Holy fuck look at that robot talk about "if you have reget you can change back" Change back like grow a penis back? Then that robot laughs about how you don't need a penis. This is exactly the kind of thing a robot would say.
    1
  21. this guy is so reasonable that he thinks its ok if you cut off your penis, you can still change back if you don't like your transition. Its a postmodern definition of reasonable.
    1
  22. +Szaam When someone peddles such nonesense as "you can change back, even if you cut off your penis". That person don't deserve any politeness. That person is deceiving everyone, hence a decepticon. That person is also a post modernist. All post modernists are decepticons in nature, the fact he have the voice of a decepticon is just the ironically cherry on top.
    1
  23. +Ozelot I can explain androgen insensitivity perfectly. Its a disease, its an error. Its a disease where a man, still a man who have xy chromosomes that reject male hormones (chromosomes are not hormones). Its like some people who have an immune system that kills their own blood cells.
    1
  24. +Ozelot See you got that right, they look like a women, the key word is look. Because their body killed male hormones, so they look like a women. They are still a man, they just look like a women. its all about looks. To you gender is nothing but a fashion expression. To the people who cares about science, we care about chromosomes, not fashion statements.
    1
  25. +Ozelot There you go again, gender is a fashion statement for you. They do look like women, that's the symptom of the disease. As for society treating those men like women, do those men present themselves as women? That's your own subjective bias speaking. If those men dress like men I doubt society would treat them like women. And this whole treating them like a women, what does that even mean? Men and women have the same rights in our society under the law.
    1
  26. +Ozelot What? Your cognitive disguise is cause your brain to bleed. I always maintained its the chromosome that make you man or woman. You keep wanting to bring looks into it. That's why you try to bring up Androgen insensitivity syndrome. If you want to bring in look, then looks is a fashion statement.
    1
  27. +Ozelot No you said society view them as women, "view" as in look. And I didn't say they dress that way, I said society doesn't treat them as women, unless they dress like women. You are the one who is treating those men as women, that's why you are projecting and saying society treat them as women. Society doesn't treat them like women, only you do. Men with AIS are not women. That is science.
    1
  28. +Ozelot That's your own projection. If those men with AIS want to dress like a women, and pretend to be women. That's them pretending. If they pretend well people around them will not know the difference. If society treat them like women, its because they pretend to be women. You are without logic. The whole argument is that trans people have a different brain then their physical body. But what you are saying is even if those men were born men, but because they have a immunial disease all of sudden they will become women and trans? Well that completely destroyed the wrong brain theory. All you have presented is that if you dress like a women you are a women. That's call a fashion statement.
    1
  29. +Ozelot You need to learn reading comprehension. I never said you claim that trans have a different brain. I said the trans community claim they have a different brain in the wrong body. What you claim is that gender expression, or gender is nothing but a fashion statement solely based on looks. You ask me to explain the existence of AIS women, well I'm telling you there is no such thing as AIS women. there is only AIS men, who might look like a women.
    1
  30. +Ozelot You claim gender is based on looks, you said they look like a women so society treat them as women. If its based on looks then its a fashion statement. Stop denying science a simple google search will prove you wrong. "Androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) is when a person who is genetically male (who has one X and one Y chromosome) is resistant to male hormones (called androgens). As a result, the person has some or all of the physical traits of a woman, but the genetic makeup of a man." Which part of genetically male did you not comprehend?
    1
  31. +ProperJimmy I mentioned looks because he keeps going on about how men with AIS look like women and so society treat them as women. I just pointed it out if he thinks, just because some men look like women then they are women. Then By his definition of gender, it is solely based on looks.
    1
  32. +Ozelot you ridicules moron, AIS doesn't affect the brain at all. A simple google search can prove you are a moron. You think hormones can give people different brains. If that's the case then all you need to do to cure trans people is to give them hormones. Give Deirdre McCloskey tons of androgen and bam, his brain would change to a man. Problem solved. Moron!
    1
  33. +Ozelot Keep denying science you moron. but apparently you found a cure of transgenderism. Just give them hormones, and their brain will change. Holy shit you deserve a nobel prize.
    1
  34. +Ozelot You just found a cure for AIS and transgenderism. The nobel prize is in the mail.
    1
  35. +Ozelot According to you hormones changes brain. So lets change Deirdre McCloskey's brain by pumping him full of male hormones and bam we have a full male.
    1
  36. robots in disguise.
    1
  37. the dislikes are unwarranted? This decepticon is trying to deceive people into saying if you don't like your transformation, you can always change back, even when you cut off your penis. Only a decepticon can lie so well.
    1
  38. +Thomas Saba I don't disagree with Rubin bringing her on the show. I disagree with the guess on what she said. That's why there is a downvote. Its rating how good the video is. If there is clear bullshit being spewed in the interview, and no one challenge that bullshit. It gets a downvote.
    1
  39. Transformers, more than meets the eye. men in disguise. Transformers...
    1
  40. +Shazy Donut I read all those stats came from self reporting surveys. Show me an FBI crime stat, hell just show me 1 trans on the news that were beaten because he was trans. At least the BLM can put a face on the news saying see the cops killed that black man. Show me some of those, you don't have any?
    1
  41. its the voice of a decepticon.
    1
  42. +Valerie Pisklak sounds like Soundwave to me.
    1
  43. That is a decepticon sitting in that chair not an autobot.
    1
  44. what are you going to do, a decepticon will always lie to you. Especially a post modernist decepticon who have an aversion to psychology.
    1