Comments by "gerhard7" (@gerhard7323) on "High excess deaths in Australia" video.

Excess 'pissy doctors' seem to be a common theme in cases such as yours when the jab's possible role in their symptoms is mentioned. 'Anything but' seems to be the goto response.
32
Like so many on here I've been telling people about my serious doubts about these insufficiently tested jabs since they came out. It rarely makes you popular I can tell you. One of the biggest issues, I guess, is that once you've had them you can't 'unhave' them or get them sucked out of you so this partly explains why some people's views have become so entrenched in support of them.. What's telling though is that it's crystal clear that fewer and fewer people are very quietly electing not to have more of them and this is born out by the sales data released by the vaccine producers themselves.
27
Given his established following it would have been far worse if he'd then said nothing or carried on as if his opinion wasn't apparently shifting in the face of mounting evidence. It sometimes takes guts to change your mind and his voice likely carries all the more weight because of it.
3
@chas8388 Yes, he's changed his view and yes he doesn't want to get banned by YT for what are, I'm sure, a variety of reasons but there's nothing wrong with treating your audience as free-thinking adults (whatever his motivation for doing so) and presenting evidence without beating them over the head with a conclusion.
2
In the UK people are being 'offered' a number of shots all at once including flu, shingles and covid or variations thereof.
2
Before all this kicked off proper I predicted much the same thing as you're alluding to. First wave took out the majority of the acutely predisposed, but for the virus itself it would gradually and inevitably become about the law of diminishing returns. Thus we would see the annual excess death rate fall as it would leave an on balance healthier population. I hadn't factored in the length and severity of the lockdowns and their after effects or a potential 'vaccine' though.
2
That's a fair and reasonable comment, but presumably you had these symptoms as a result of having covid ie before the vaccines came out and before you had any?
1
@Jamesnebula Again fair comments. I also had an adverse reaction to a flu shot the company I was working for made me take. Lasted well over three months. Had covid twice. Neither time was pleasant, but still preferable as it last a few weeks rather than months. These jabs are untested by normal protocols but I wouldn't stand in the way of anyone else who elected to have them. I object on the grounds of their unproven safety, their efficacy and the fact that there have been attempts and still are to mandate them. My body. My choice.
1
On the plus side global covid jab uptake has plummeted from 43m a week at its peak to 3m a week currently. Given that we can be near certain that these jabs, even the earlier ones, offer short lived immunity then this undoubtedly points to a growing number of people 'quietly' growing ever more sceptical about these jabs' efficacy and/or safety. Early 'conspiracy theorist' or not.
1
Even the FDA has banned use of Johnson jab in US for under 18s due to blood clotting issues associated with it. Presumably you think they're being way overcautious?
1
And nothing wrong with that. It's called voluntarily exercising your own personal choice. Given that whatever number you've had it obviously offers no sterilising immunity and doesn't stop you from passing it onto others may we also assume that you respect others' choice not to have it?
1
Lower 20% 3x more likely to die from covid than upper 20%? Aside from the obvious health advantages that wealth usually brings it's also pretty obvious that certain socioeconomic groups were still forced to go out and work during the lockdowns for economic reasons and some weren't. Also if they hadn't then our societies would have effectively ground to a halt. This also helps to explain some of the more poisonous and divisive social attitudes towards the jab itself.
1
And long may you be able to exercise that right to do so just as you'll afford others the right to a different point of view.
1
Because most of those who would have to do the reporting on it were heavily complicit in entirely unquestioningly propagating it in the first place.
1
All fine. Just so long as it's voluntary.
1
@christopherrobinson7541 Hence, 'Variations thereof'. Flu and shingles can be had together as can covid and shingles, although it is recommended that they are done separately according to the NHS so that if there is an adverse reaction they have a clearer idea of which one caused it. I know of people who have had them together. Flu boosters and covid shots can also be had together.
1
Don't need to. Look at how shots which were being given at 43m a week globally at their peak have now plummeted to 3m a week now and will likely fall much further. Quietly, fewer and fewer people are lining up for them whatever their reasons. Safety, efficacy, 'done their bit' etc. The cost of this exercise is gradually shifting back off the public books back onto the private's and the vaccine producers are starting to get nervous as their cash cow is drying up.
1