Comments by "gerhard7" (@gerhard7323) on "James O'Brien vs Andrew Bridgen defender | LBC" video.

  1. It was certainly a mistake for Bridgen to reference the Holocaust like that. Daft. The rest of what he said wasn't remotely daft. Still, much more comfortable for most people to talk about about his ill-judged comparison than the actual facts of his speech.
    11
  2. It worries me that it worries you that he has a vote.
    7
  3.  @kevinsmarts9953 It worries me that it worries you that it worries me that it worries him that he has a vote.
    5
  4.  @chatham43  I rather think that many of the people commenting on here would rather we didn't.
    3
  5. Technically, prior to last year when the very longstanding long understood definition of a vaccine was changed these jabs were NOT vaccines. They only are now because the definition has changed. They offer NO sterilizing immunity and they prevent neither contraction nor the spreading of the virus.
    2
  6.  @fazziebear  ...and for a bonus point you get to build upon your fatuous, vacuous remark by actually saying something to challenge what I've said.
    1
  7. Never stand in the way of a blithering idiot (like O'brien) when he's making a mistake.
    1