Youtube comments of gerhard7 (@gerhard7323).
-
547
-
474
-
433
-
345
-
325
-
294
-
290
-
234
-
195
-
180
-
169
-
158
-
150
-
143
-
142
-
123
-
113
-
108
-
107
-
99
-
90
-
90
-
89
-
88
-
87
-
86
-
85
-
80
-
79
-
78
-
78
-
75
-
74
-
73
-
70
-
70
-
68
-
63
-
63
-
62
-
62
-
60
-
59
-
59
-
57
-
56
-
55
-
54
-
53
-
53
-
50
-
47
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
36
-
35
-
If you extend the current logic of 'trans' in this instance then this makes perfect sense.
Currently, being 'trans' means asking the world to accept something which it categorically knows not to be true ie usually that you're the opposite of what you were born as.
Saying you're 'trans' whilst still remaining a fully intact male and still wishing to referred to as 'he' makes perfect sense in this Alice meets the Cheshire Cat context.
'Alice asked the Cheshire Cat, who was sitting in a tree, “What road do I take?”
The cat asked, “Where do you want to go?”
“I don’t know,” Alice answered.
“Then,” said the cat, “it really doesn’t matter, does it?
There's only a contradiction if we apply the pre-existing, traditional, rigidly defined norms, not if we apply the new 'trans' norm which basically says you can be whatever you yourself want to be on any given day and you're perfectly at liberty to completely redefine yourself tomorrow and the day after that and the day after that and so on.
'You' get to define (and redefine) what you are, nobody else ever does.
Genius.
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
Noticed that too, but there is a predominance, albeit personally anecdotal, that 'Remain' voters are more skewed towards this way of thinking.
I remember as the Brexit debate unfurled around the 2016 referendum that one passionate, I think rather naive, prospective Remain voter proudly said to me,
'I'm much happier to live in a benign dictatorship than anything else to be honest'
To which I replied,
'Dictatorships don't usually stay that benign indefinitely I'm afraid'.
Still, perhaps someone should be paid vast sums of money, from the public purse naturally, to look into this?
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
The mRNA vaccines now being recommended for use in young people, a group that statistics decisively show are barely remotely vulnerable to the serious effects of covid, the Pfizer, the Moderna, the Curevax and Walvax ones, are mRNA vaccines which essentially employs a relatively novel delivery technology that was hitherto 'unsuccessful' in the numerous, disparate applications in which it had been tested over the decades and, though around for twenty years or so, had remained resolutely globally unlicensed until December 2020, right up until the advent of covid last year...
These aren't some nutty, out there, tin foil hat claims. It's actual, unassailable, verifiable fact, so if YouTube see fit to challenge this assertion I'd love to know why.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
@afritimm Opinions vary on who exactly broke the Minsk agreement depending on whom you ask, but it's notable that Germany's Merkel, as one of the brokers of that agreement along with France, recently claimed that it was only ever designed to buy Ukraine time, presumably prior to a Russian invasion.
Another point of note is that the Budapest Memorandum was signed in 1994 after prior promises were made and noted, recorded in the US National Security Archive I believe, to Gorbachev by James Baker that NATO would not move one inch further to the east after Gorbachev agreed to the Soviet military not intervening in the collapsing East Germany.
The 'Ukrainian' nuclear warheads that it surrendered to Russia for decommissioning as result of that memorandum were, to all intents and purposes, property of the Russian state and were effectively useless anyway as they did not have the necessary Russian codes to use them.
Now call me old fashioned but the 2008 Nato declaration paving the way for Ukraine and Georgia's accession to Nato was a deliberately provocative act as was the well-documented US CIA led attempt at regime change in 2014 that led to the Maidan massacre.
No one comes out of this smelling of roses, but the original sin here looks to me as if it began in the 1990s when the US, starting with Clinton, and the West generally started to treat the end of the Cold War as some kind of victory over the former Soviet Union to be exploited to the max.
We are reaping the bitter seeds of that hubris and shortsightedness today.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
US economist Wray is, famously, an advocate for MMT.
MMT is fine as long as the economy is forever reasonably robust, growing sufficiently to absorb the debt/money creation and isn't overly reliant on borrowing in a foreign currency as others often are.
Thus far, broadly, the US for numerous reasons, including most pertinently its exorbitant privilege, is able to pursue the MMT path but that path, VERY obviously, isn't open to others.
To conclude then he isn't 'wrong' per se, but what he's claiming here can really only be applied to the US and not to others for, I think, glaringly obvious reasons.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The Israel Gaza situation has been horrific for all those involved and still experiencing it. Still is.
But for us all sitting comfortably in the West in front of our screens it's at least shown us who the pretenders and shameless grifters were when it came to standing by the fundamental principle of free speech.
Murray, Rubin, Shapiro, Tousi, Weiss etc
Glen Greenwald, Kim Iverson, George Galloway, Matt Taibbi, Corbett have, thus far, shown themselves to be the real deal.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Interesting interview as always but, speaking as an agnostic, be it religion or political ideology whatever they might be, either might be worthy of respect and consideration, but both should also always be wide open to the process of permanent questioning.
The problem, invariably, is that neither often are as they both are liable to be hijacked by the apparently most zealous, frequently most opportunistic, often most charismatic, intelligent members of their followers and, unfortunately, for less than pure reasons.
In short they become nothing more than a cynical means of control.
Whilst I can buy into the, 'we ultimately all need a rock to cling to in our lives' argument, it always comes with certain, very firm caveats.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
She's great, she's super smart she's, frankly, lovely and wants to publicly admit her own biases and failings in order to progress a righteous cause, but when it came to the Sewell Report she railed against its necessarily generalised pointing out of black, Carribbean, essentially single parent, absentee father families being part of a bigger problem and took it personally, when the specific referenced situation quite clearly didn't apply to her own circumstances and, in her mind, could simply be boiled down to prejudice based on the colour of people's skin.....sorry 7/8s of this interview was great, but it all went a bit pear shaped at the end for me....as I suspect it did for the interviewers looking at their faces.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
It's painfully obvious that Western economies like the UK have simply exported their carbon emissions to other poorer, developing countries, often to their own businesses very obvious disadvantage.
No wonder countries like the rapidly developing China, which is essentially the workshop of the world and therefore inevitably the highest carbon emitter, aren't interested in joining too readily in this virtue signalling, hypocritical charade.
Nor is it any surprise that net global carbon emissions are at best steady or, as is likely, slowly rising.
Couple that with the actual price that these policies are exacting like the recent exponential energy price hikes, the near collapse in the UK of the so-called 'energy market' and the oh so ironic vital domestic CO2 shortage caused by the closure of energy intensive fertiliser businesses in the UK and you wonder when or how, if ever, all of this nonsense will end.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I've certainly heard a lot, yes.
I'm really still trying to process it.
Is it just a scenario that we're sleepwalking into out of complacency or apathy or are there genuinely dastardly transnational 'plans' afoot?
'Capitalism' is supposedly about prosperous, dynamic free markets, decentralized power structures, social mobility, continual investment for profit and protecting individual freedoms whereas it has provably delivered monopolies, oligopolies, cronyism, increased financialization, state approved usury, unimaginable debt levels, endless regulation, economic stagnation, sh*t public services and decaying infrastructure plus fewer individual freedoms over the decades not more.
Whilst it sounds idealistic, genuine democracy and accountability is still our best and only hope for pushing back against this slow motion creeping technocratic coup, but I'm starting to see that option gradually ebbing away.
I see unsettling parallels and connections with our politics there and, like I said, facing up to the horror of the contrived realities you clearly believe are happening is easier said than done not least because of the inevitable consequences that will come with that if enough people do.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The Hunter Biden laptop story is often attributed to Russian disinformation, but as the WSJ reported,
'To create a plausible fake laptop, with a plausible index of files, plausible time stamps, plausible browser history, thousands of plausible photos, text messages, emails and other documents would be beyond the Kremlin and laughably disproportionate to any aim the Kremlin might hope to achieve.'
So was it buried by a largely sympathetic to Biden, undeniably anti-Trump media or was it simply regarded by a completely non-partisan media that had spent years doggedly pursuing Trump's 2016 election as illegitimate partly due to Russian meddling as a laughable hoax.
npr was forced to apologize for initially falsely claiming that US intelligence had dismissed the story as purely Russian disinformation, Hunter Biden admitted on CBS that the laptop could be his as he previously had the same model stolen and CNN flatout spiked the story.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@gertstronkhorst2343 What I think is not relevant.
Being accused of something isn't the same thing as being tried and convicted by a court of something.
Did you think Salmond, Gambuccini, Assange and Cliff Richard were guilty?
What I'm struck by is the timing of this and how a liberal establishment which included the BBC, The Guardian and C4 once saw him as a darling and defended him when his behaviour was likely at its worst is now gunning for him.
Gunning for him now he's a family man intent on ruffling aforementioned liberal establishment's feathers.
His past behaviour wasn't something I'd defend, but unless it was criminal, provably so, then we shouldn't be talking about his victims, sexual assaults, coercive behaviour, rapes, underage sex etc
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Very often in conversation, particularly with people we've never met, where we come from can change according to circumstances be it a country,, a county, a city,, a town, a part of town etc
Our answers can change in an effort to fit in or find a connection, no matter how tenuous sometimes, with the person we're talking to.
Where you were born, where you once might have lived and where you live now might all be relevant according to the conversational circumstances.
This poor woman was likely just doing her job as she had done for the last 60 years, not acting maliciously and this lady was likely calculatingly just giving her more rope to hang herself whilst composing her damning Tweet in her head.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@laurareneesmith Presumably you're talking about the Budapest Memorandum?
First off it was a memorandum negotiated at a political level not a legally binding treaty that offered assurances but NOT guarantees.
The United States itself publicly maintained that "the Memorandum is not legally binding", calling it a "political commitment"
Secondly, nor did it allow for the fact that the US would spend years from Clinton onwards trying to stoke the unrest it has done in the country including taking provocative steps toward it (and Georgia's) NATO membership culminating in the CIA sponsored coup in 2014 with years spent meddling thereafter.
Thirdly, the US hasn't sought to 'defend' plucky Ukraine. It has sought to arm it, often offload its crappiest, outmoded materiel on it, saddle it with debt and, most egregiously, seen hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians needlessly slaughtered in yet another of its imperialistic, corporatist proxy wars.
If that makes anyone proud to be 'a Murrican', then God have mercy on their souls.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Let's face it, all these discussions are effectively debated and prefaced under the collective belief that there is some kind of 'international rules based order'.
The 'international rules based order', even if such a thing exists, is still essentially defined by the US on any given day.
To quote Humpty Dumpty,
"When I use a word"
From Alice in Wonderland, Humpty Dumpty says, "When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less".
"Which is to be master"
In response to Alice asking if he can make words mean many different things, Humpty Dumpty replies, "The question is, Which is to be master---that's all".
'Humpty Dumpty', of course, eventually climbs too high and 'has a great fall'....
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The brutal truth is is that a new Israel in Palestine was a solution to a problem essentially created by the Western powers at the time, including Russia.
Antisemitism was on the march across the already deeply divided European continent in the early 20th Century, particularly in places like Germany and Russia, and many European Jews were looking for an escape route.
America, the UK and others were reluctant to take in more Jews than they already had in any great numbers and Mandated Palestine, a recent spoil of the First World War and the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, seemed to be the best way to fulfil the brief and minimise the problem. Domestically, at least.
A narrative helped along considerably by Judaism's strong historical connections with Palestine, although there were no significant numbers of Jews in Palestine until the late 1920s.
Israel, of course, has subsequently gone on to flourish, but it couldn't ever have done so without continued Western support.
The US, I believe, was quite late to the party when it came to supporting Israel as the penny slowly dropped there some time after WW2 quite how useful a friendly outpost could be in a restive oil rich region often largely hostile to America's interests.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@deanodebo Don't for one moment confuse extreme Zionism with anti-Semitism.
Israel and some Jewish people attempt to in order to excuse their actions, but it's wearing pretty thin now.
Criticising the actions of the state of Israel have zero to with anti-Semitism.
Some of the most vociferous, eloquent critics of Zionists and the treatment of Palestinians are in fact Jews like Finkelstein.
Katie Halper, Max Blumenthal, Aaron Mate, Glen Greenwald to name but a few.
What's happening in Gaza isn't being done by 'Jews' it's being done by Israelis. Bad ones. Their faith really has nothing to do with it.
Even Netanyahu is secular. As have many of his previous 'illustrious' predecessors been.
As to your claim on Palestine as a Christian what exactly would you base that on. I mean seriously?
In terms of Syria, yet another Western/US inspired brutal war in a similar vein as Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan, what do you mean exactly by your claim that nobody cares about it?
Again, it wasn't that long ago that Syria was held up as one of the more liberal, stable, multi-ethnic regimes in the Middle East until 'we' in the West decided to shake things up a little.
Assad, with the help of the Russians, has been busily fighting ISIS.
Essentially a Sunni Islam death cult that arose directly out of the ashes of the US invasion of Iraq but upon the basis that 'my enemy's enemy is my friend' the US and Israel have previously sided with because its waging war against Assad.
The Middle East is a mess, but there's little doubt that 'we' are responsible for making it far worse than it would be.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Trevorjesuischarlie I'm not a climate change denier, but having made the effort to seek out the arguments I'm a healthy climate change sceptic.
To me, currently, it looks like yet another a grift and a taxpayer sponsored gravy train based on what looks to me like a matter of faith.
A matter of faith that's highly profitable to some and ultimately highly dependent on suckling from the state teat as so many things are...many more than most people actually realize in fact.
A quasi-religion not helped by what looks like to me like a load of comfortably off virtue signalling hypocrites who are not only intent on warning everyone (twas forever thus) that 'The End Is Nigh' lest they repent, but don't seem to be doing much in the way of serious repenting or hair shirting themselves.
Mitigating habitat destruction, preventing over-exploitation of resources and pollution, promoting sustainability and good stewardship are absolute no-brainers in my book and in everyone's interests, even if a degree of state subsidy is required to it, but trying to hang it on the 'air hook' of an anthropogenic imminent climate change catastrophe is all too often self-serving cynical doom mongering in my opinion.
If someone wants to talk about the modern consumer model being broken and in serious need of attention then, frankly, I'm all ears but climate change science, particularly when there are some extremely learned and accomplished dissenting climate scientists whose views are effectively censored on MSM, ain't gonna do it.
Science ONLY works by having its hypotheses constantly open to debate and challenge and once words like 'consensus' and 'settled' are used, particularly regarding something so fundamental as this, without so much of a hint of a blush I start to worry.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DeathRayGraphics No, I'm not saying that it's just that I refuse to see this simplistic obsession to view literally everything through the prism of 'race' if you're a POC all the time as particularly helpful or, indeed, empowering.
I may yet be proved horribly wrong but I somehow doubt the shameful inaction of police officers at Uvalde had anything whatsoever to do with the ethnicity of those poor kids or LEOs involved and everything to do with the latters' fear and incompetence.
Similarly, the outrageous claims made by Infowars' Alex Jones relating to the Sandy Hook shooting can't be put into any kind of 'racism' box because of the skin colours of those involved. It doesn't make them any less abhorrent though.
The two other policemen in attendance the day that Floyd was killed by the white Chauvin were both of minority origin and it's worthy of note that the prosecution didn't actively seek to use race as an aggravating factor.
That horrific method of restraint used by those officers that day wasn't unique to that occasion, to black people or to Mr Floyd.
Police violence is inexcusable whomsoever it is directed against and racism is equally so and must be addressed whenever it genuinely occurs, but I refuse to let those who see it literally everywhere and in everything deliberately seek to sow hatred and division, be they black, white or anything else, win.
There's plenty of police brutality directed at white and Hispanic people in America if you care to look at the official figures although I accept that it is disproportionately likely to be directed at black people and that skin colour undeniably plays a part in that, but there are also many other factors at play, not least socioeconomic ones.
Police violence against white people is just that, police violence, but against black people it's almost always automatically assumed to be purely racially motivated it seems.
1
-
1
-
@DeathRayGraphics I know you about as well as you know me so let's not play that game.
Rights, either yours or mine, have got nothing to do with this.
I'm not pretending that racism doesn't exist, I'm not pretending that police brutality doesn't exist and I'm not pretending that black people statistically, particularly in the US, aren't more likely to be on the end of it than white people.
If I'm mad at all the people I'm mad at are those who perpetrate injustice, particularly those who do it falsely under the guise of representing it, but I'm also not going to broad brush condemn ALL those who put their lives on the line everyday trying to uphold it for the greater good as you seem to.
You seem like you're a 'let's burn down the granary' type of guy 'Ray' as if somehow this will solve all your problems. It won't.
Reducing all your ills to the colour of someone's skin might be a neat, powerful and appealing narrative in some quarters, but it'll only get you so far and will only serve to further entrench some opposing views in the process, so good luck with that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
As in the West's 'peak covid', what would be interesting is to know the genuine Chinese death rates from covid and who's actually dying from it.
We'll never likely know of course.
China famously has a disproportionately large aging population that might well be more susceptible to covid and overwhelm its healthcare system but, with or without these jabs western mRNA, Chinese Sinovax or otherwise, the vast majority of China's working population is demonstrably, from our experience, not vulnerable in any significant numbers.
This begs the question, much as it did and still does in the West, just exactly what are these repeated and protracted blanket lockdowns about?
They certainly can't be driven by doubt or ignorance as the West's response and its now less than favourable unfolding outcomes has surely provided ample evidence for the Chinese leadership.
Are they driven by fear as, Wizard of Oz-stylee, general populaces apparently come to the belated realisation that their ostensibly well-meaning leaders aren't omnipotent and can't legislate against people dying? An opportunity to show people exactly who's boss by an inherently dictatorial leadership perhaps after a worrying perceptible shift toward liberalism? Or is it an unhappy combination of the two?
Answers on a postcard.....
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The brutal truth is is that a new Israel in Palestine was a solution to a problem essentially created by the western imperial powers at the time, including Russia.
Antisemitism was on the march across the already deeply divided European continent in the early 20th Century, particularly in places like Germany and Russia, and many European Jews were forced into looking for a potential escape route.
America, the UK and others were reluctant to take in more Jews than they already had in any great numbers and Mandated Palestine, a recent spoil of the First World War and the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, seemed to be the best way to fulfil the brief and minimise the problem. Domestically, at least.
A narrative helped along considerably by Judaism's strong historical connections with Palestine, although there were no significant numbers of Jews in Palestine until the late 1920s.
Israel, of course, has subsequently gone on to flourish, but it couldn't ever have done so without continued Western support.
The US, I believe, was quite late to the party when it came to supporting Israel as the penny slowly dropped there some time after WW2 quite how useful a friendly outpost could be in a restive oil rich region often largely hostile to America's interests.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Perhaps, but presumably you're also personally open to re-evaluating what happened in Vietnam and is still happening in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen etc?
In the latter examples, just because those people aren't white European, there isn't an advanced social media culture, most of their populations don't have easy access to smartphones and, let's be honest, most in the West don't really give a sh*t about them, what exactly does someone like Stone have to re-evaluate here pray?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In the UK the average age of a covid death remains over 80 and, I suspect, given the well-known age demographic of Florida it's unlikely to be that different there.
Yes, more people went to meet their maker a little sooner than they might have done because of covid but covid was, primarily, a killer of the old and infirm.
These jabs, however, appear to represent a serious, unnecessary on balance risk to otherwise healthy individuals, particularly young males, and that's not taking into further consideration the seriously deleterious ongoing after effects of lockdowns on various societies throughout the world.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Jackie Magill I think one has to look at the prevailing atmosphere, or was it 'atmosfear', during that period.
There was a lot of lying by omission, obfuscation and fear mongering at the time, much of it driven by petty politics not actual science.
By far my biggest beefs to this day are that many governments and scientific establishments backed up by MSM tried to mandate these jabs despite their obvious dodgy provenance and misleadingly them calling 'vaccines', highly suggestive of sterilising immunity, when they were not in any way any such thing.
Dr Campbell, on YouTube at least, was attempting to enlighten people with the dripfeed of information as and when it came in over the two or more years.
We, as free thinking, autonomous individuals, were free to listen to interpret Dr Campbell's message how we saw fit essentially.
As we still are.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@acthompson9983 Looks more like someone is choosing to ignore it because it doesn't fit with their own self serving ideological belief system to me.
CBA or Leon Trotsky have got nothing to do with the price of fish. Nice try.
Scottish Water has a debt level of £80m? You presumably and seriously think that is large amount of money for a company required to make regular, ongoing substantial investments in infrastructure crucial to people's everyday lives?
How about this then?
Britain's big 9 water companies have built up debt levels of £50bn siphoning off vast payments in interest rates, dividends and 'finance fees' each year.
Six of those – Thames Water, Anglian, Northumbrian, Southern, Yorkshire and Wessex – are almost exclusively owned by foreign interests, including Chinese government interests.
Thames Water, the largest, in 2021, had a net debt level of over £14bn.
All of these debt costs add to the cost people pay for their water bills.
Do the maths.
Is that clearer for you?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Technically, we're still living in what are essentially the dying embers (or is it icicles?) of an ice age.
An ice age which began 2.6m years ago - a mere footnote in the history of planet Earth known as the Pleistocene Period - and which started to come to an end around 11,000 years ago.
To imagine that human activity, particularly at its current industrialised levels literally employing millions of years of locked up in the earth solar and concentrated organic energy in the form of fossil fuels won't in some way contribute to hitherto 'unusual' temperature rises is, I think, for the birds.
The real question then is quite how much the releasing of that pent up energy has contributed to the warming of the planet, particularly given how the planet effectively has its own thermostat working away 24/7.
This lady, quite rightly, says she doesn't know or what threats those relatively minor temperature rises may or may not pose and, frankly, I don't believe anyone does.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Great Unherd comment:
Last year, Julie Burchill posed the question, “Do you know a Mary Sue – a self-adoring paragon of virtue who can only ever admit to faults which are actually boasts in disguise?”
As I read the article I was pondering who might be the biggest ‘Mary Sue’ in recent British Politics, when I realised it was not so much a Mary Sue as a ‘Rory Stew.’
No doubt Harriet Harperson would damn the patriarchy for stealing yet another accolade from the Sisterhood, but the biggest Mary Sue is, horrors, a bloke – to give him his full title, Roderick James Nugent Stewart OBE FRSGS FRSL, academic, diplomat, author, broadcaster, former soldier, rumoured-spook and politician-turned-podcaster.
Haunted Eddie Redmayne, if fashioned by the chaps at Aardman Animation after a long lunch.
Rory is a man of undoubted abilities – but there’s no one in less doubt of his abilities than he is himself. His particular skill is the self-effacing humble-brag. Whilst often appearing to apologise for the privileges bestowed on him by his Eton and Balliol education, he still always manages to compare himself favourably to other Eton/Oxford grads and remind you that Boris is not really that posh after all. Nor, even, David Cameron. Rory’s never too shy to coyly drop a mention that, of course, he tutored the young Princes William & Harry, whilst his Spectator Diary was peppered with (seemingly casual) asides of his velvet-knickerbockered childhood, his view of Hyde Park from the windows of a large town house that has been in the family for generations and is close enough to Knightsbridge barracks that the Household Cavalry clop by, …. oh, and did I mention I’m a regular visitor to Highgrove?
There’s no question he’s led a genuinely interesting and varied life, and is a man with a prodigious CV – though his recollections do seem to differ from others who were present at each stage of his storied career. His brief stint as a Provincial Deputy Governor in Iraq earned him the sobriquet “Florence of Arabia” from the embedded press, as he loved nothing more than to have his photo taken in the desert, wearing flowing robes and striking suitably warrior-poet-philosopher poses.
Nothing could skewer Rory’s unadmitted hunger for acclaim more than his hero T.E. Lawrence’s observation of his own “craving to be famous, and a horror of being known to like being known”.
In his memoir – and every time I’ve heard him speak – Rory casts himself as the reluctant hero, come to save the country from Tory populism, and the Tories from themselves. For a man who claims not to want to be centre-stage, he seems to have a preternatural ability to wander ‘unknowingly’ into the limelight. He makes much of the idea that he’d like nothing more than to live the life of a poet, or perhaps a Victorian explorer, but duty calls and thus he reluctantly puts down his slim volume of Ovid to take up the challenge of leading the Tory Party or to have a run at becoming Mayor of London. How galling that both jobs were snaffled up by his deeply unserious nemesis.
Rory Stew hates Brexit, natch, but above all he loathes Boris Johnson – really despises him. Predictably the subject of Brexit and Boris provide much fodder for the podcast Rory co-hosts with the bagpipe-bothering Blairite bully-boy, Alastair Campbell. One wonders whether what Rory-Stew most dislikes about Bo-Jo is that they’re both sharp-elbowed Old Etonians who cultivated their quirks and studied eccentricities to a level of theatrical performance, yet it was the shambolic Boris who, unfathomably, succeeded in attaining the top job.
If you want a Guardian masterclass in how to squeeze self-aggrandisement and noble suffering into a description of one’s own humiliation, this takes some beating: “I had been rejected by my colleagues in the leadership race and I had been unable to prevent a man who was the antithesis of everything I valued in public life becoming the prime minister. I lost confidence in myself, my judgment and – because so many of its people had voted for Boris Johnson – almost in the country itself. In 2020, I moved to Yale University to teach and reflect on what I had learned in government and in defeat.”
Rory Stewart, 'a sneery little know it all who simultaneously fails to come to any discernible point about anything'.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ultimate conspiracy theory perhaps, but it wouldn't surprise me, particularly after Israel's pager attacks, to ultimately discover that companies like YT, Apple, Google, FB, BlackRock, Blackstone, Goldman Sachs, J P Morgan etc are really just de facto soft power fronts for the US state.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@oliverscorsim Regulation, particularly in modern consumer economies, isn't necessarily always about being consistent and doing the right thing all the time, it's as much about keeping people consuming.
A lot of the time this means getting people to discard their old stuff and buy new. Environmental cost be damned, I'm afraid.
Trouble is is that sometimes, for various reasons, people are reluctant to do that so easily and sensibilities and sensitivies vary from place to place.
Seemingly having a benign motive and narrative can only help.
Better still, a quasi-apocalyptic one where the need to consume meets the personal desires of the individual and the assuring feeling that one is doing so responsibly. More responsibily than those that aren't.
Whether you use the regulation stick or the tax break carrot matters less than the outcome.
The EU/German car industry scam was just one execrable example where a particularly powerful political and economic lobby ie the German car industry effectively managed to circumvent these strict emissions rules for years with dodgy software right under the noses of EU regulators.
What, exactly, were they doing throughout this I wonder?
Asleep at the wheel or the tailpipe perhaps?
Whatever their likely self serving motivations, the German auto industries' deliberate intention to continually mislead consumers across the globe was only discovered by US regulators not EU ones and any subsequent fines and legal penalties handed out were paltry.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In terms of covid era China, today's invaded Ukraine, Brexit, Trump and the world generally I would say this discussion has aged about as well as milk.
That's not really meant as a criticism, but it just goes to show how fluid these things can be, how unpredictable and also how subjective they can be.
Democracies generally are hard won, take many, many years to establish, should never be taken for granted and work best, by and large, when they're perceived as accountable and informed by consent.
Once the perception of consent is lost by a sufficient number of people then they will start to falter.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The one positive that Gaza has revealed is indeed the unveiling of anti-woke, anti-cancel culture free speech advocate fraudsters like Murray, Peterson, Rubin, Shapiro etc
It's also thankfully shown us who the trustworthy, principled true believers are.
People like Galloway, Iverson, Napolitano, Greenwald, Blumenthal, Mate etc
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Perhaps even Trump is coming round to Netanyahu and Israel's duplicitous agenda?
Netanyahu is on record as claiming first in 1992 that Iran is on the cusp of developing nuclear weapons.
He went on to repeat these claims in 1993, 1995, 1996, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Putin's not a nice guy. That's not in question.
He couldn't have successfully ruled a vast, disparate, fractious country like Russia for decades if he were.
What you, like many others, seem to studiously ignore are the results of Western foreign policy over the decades and what informs it.
I'm thinking Vietnam, South America, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Afghanistan, Iraq, Israel/Gaza, Ukraine...places like that.
Only the naive or foolish could claim that it wasn't informed primarily by self-interest or that it was about exporting genuine democracy, peace and freedom to these countries.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Just for the record I know two people who've died from COVID, one prematurely.
I also know of one person who's in a serious condition in hospital because he was all but forced to have the jab by his company, Pfizer I believe, and another, a cancer patient of 57, who was unable to access the cancer treatment she needed because of years of COVID restrictions and who died last week.
The UK now has its largest ever health service waiting list of 6m and counting, the pandemic has cost an estimated £400bn and counting and hundreds of thousands will now die prematurely because of coming up for two years of COVID restrictions.
The vaccine is not a vaccine requiring three jabs in a year and possibly more in perpetuity and has not led to the promise of getting back to normal.
The average age of a covid death in the UK still remains at 82 after nigh on two years of this, pretty much the same as the average life expectancy.
Ernby's death due to COVID restrictions, if correct, is a personal tragedy but it is still a statistical outlier and does not change the fact that millions upon millions of more premature deaths will occur because of these COVID measures.
Deaths, apparently, that in some people's eyes simply don't count.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Worth pointing out that only if the IAEA is to be believed, and I certainly wouldn't bet the farm on it, the Iranians had recently enriched uranium to 60%.
Well above the JCPOA limit of 3.67%, but also well below the 90% needed to produce weapons grades for nuclear weapons.
Notwithstanding the fact that Israel is a Western supported rogue nuclear state itself, this increase in enrichment levels only occurred AFTER Trump abandoned the aforementioned JCPOA agreement in 2018.
His reasons, other than his usual 'it was a bad deal' rhetoric, for doing so remain unclear as he was repeatedly warned NOT to do so by many of the saner voices in his administration.
The reasons since cited include his hatred towards Obama (under whom this treaty was negotiated in 2015) to the inclusion of neocons like 'Pimpeo' and 'The Walrus of War' Bolton he invited into the chaotic 2016 administration.
The most likely overriding reason, however, was his noticeable pivot to the Right wing extremist Netanyahu and the need to appeal to the highly influential and wealthy Israel lobby in the US egged on by the likes of the odious Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.
Thus one can't help but feel that much of this denouement has, as much as it possibly can, been stage managed and in the US Deep State's foreign policy pipeline for some time.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
'Nothing could skewer Rory’s unadmitted hunger for acclaim more than his hero T.E. Lawrence’s observation of his own “craving to be famous, and a horror of being known to like being known”.
In his memoir – and every time I’ve heard him speak – Rory casts himself as the reluctant hero, come to save the country from Tory populism, and the Tories from themselves. For a man who claims not to want to be centre-stage, he seems to have a preternatural ability to wander ‘unknowingly’ into the limelight. He makes much of the idea that he’d like nothing more than to live the life of a poet, or perhaps a Victorian explorer, but duty calls and thus he reluctantly puts down his slim volume of Ovid to take up the challenge of leading the Tory Party or to have a run at becoming Mayor of London. How galling that both jobs were snaffled up by his deeply unserious nemesis.
Rory Stew hates Brexit, natch, but above all he loathes Boris Johnson – really despises him. Predictably the subject of Brexit and Boris provide much fodder for the podcast Rory co-hosts with the bagpipe-bothering Blairite bully-boy, Alastair Campbell. One wonders whether what Rory-Stew most dislikes about Bo-Jo is that they’re both sharp-elbowed Old Etonians who cultivated their quirks and studied eccentricities to a level of theatrical performance, yet it was the shambolic Boris who, unfathomably, succeeded in attaining the top job.'
Paddy Taylor, Unherd.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Far right is as far right does. It's THAT simple.
Meloni, thus far, is not 'far right', but what she is is a threat to the status quo and, most importantly, the European Project itself as it stands
If she steps out of line, only in my opinion of course, then I'll be first in line to criticize her, but until she does she will be, unlike most of her Brussels based counterparts, the democratically elected leader of Italy until such time as she isn't.
That's kinda the point here people.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@scottb32a Brexit is a process, not an event and it was, first and foremost, a political act for the longer term.
A political act, albeit with possible unknown and unknowable immediate economic consequences.
The EU is, as I say, nowadays a political project facilitated by its economics rather than an economic project facilitated by its politics as it was far moreso in the past until Maastricht in 1990.
2016 was truly a one-off opportunity, particularly for those of us who are acutely aware of the contempt with which the EU and previous national political establishments have held previous referenda in.
I'm also aware that a lot of the claims made regarding the economic situation in the UK, as if they're unique to the Brexited UK, are demonstrably false for those inclined (or not too lazy) to look at other EU member states, particularly comparable ones.
The other thing to note is that a lot of the problems we are witnessing, like stagnating wages for example, were long manifest whilst the UK was still a member of the EU, not having risen in real terms since 2008.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Well, sadly, Matthew Goodwin is dead right here.
A small proportion of usually well to do individuals with white saviour complexes and luxury belief systems are disproportionately able to influence our media, social media and institutions and they are, effectively, ceaselessly agitating for the rights of another small proportion to be able to do the same by obsessing about the one thing that makes them different rather than the myriad of things that make them the same as everyone else.
These fearless slayers of successive confected imaginary foes are seeking out seemingly ever smaller and smaller minority groups and essentially suggesting a deliberate societal and institutional concerted effort designed to actively discriminate against them when most people have far more serious everyday personal concerns.
It seems to be a rather all too successful modus operandi, nevermind a lucrative one in terms of leeching off the public purse.
All this does, of course, is help to sow division and resentment in what would otherwise be a relatively harmonious, civilized, equitable if eternally imperfect society so one can't help feeling sometimes that this relatively small 'elite's' intentions are either severely misguided or, worse, downright malign.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@elektrotehnik94 True, but our politicians seem intent in the West in presenting our decisions to our own peoples and the rest of the world as the 'morally correct' ones when, in fact, they are so very often made in our own self-interests to the obvious detriment of others.
There seems to be this prevailing mindset in the West then, certainly amongst the populations and its media, that the rest of the world is too backward and/or dumb to see these actions for what they truly are.
I have no problem with the idea of realpolitik whatsoever, but what I have come to increasingly resent is the way in which these harsh choices are dressed up in a cloak of morality and respectability by our politicians and media.
Our societies, generally, are more open, safe, secure and prosperous than others not least because we have leant to continually exploit and undermine others far weaker and less so outside the blessed fold.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Russell Brand, certainly in the past, was an unreconstructed, frequently appallingly behaved d!ck and I suspect he would freely admit that now.
Sachsgate was a real nadir and is something that should haunt him and 'Wossy' to their graves.
At least Brand had the vague excuse of addiction there, unlike Ross.
That said, there seems to be this bizarre refusal to understand that literally thousands of young women in his less than glorious heyday were literally throwing themselves at him on a daily basis.
They weren't his victims. They weren't mindless automatons. They weren't cynically manipulated idiots. They were, and let's be brutally honest and grown up here, after a sh@g and, ideally, a relationship with the openly admitted sex addict and bad boy Russell Brand.
They weren't after his autograph or a cosy fireside chat FFS. They were after a piece of the man and he inevitably duly obliged.
Yes, it's sordid, but all those pearl clutchers out there feigning shock and disgust that he should apparently be taking advantage of these supposedly sweet innocent souls either need to grow up or ask themselves what it is that's truly motivating their animus.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@enderwiggin1113 Sure, thanks.
Maybe I just know more people who like to throw it into conversation with little real intention of doing anything about it.
The big issue really is people changing their habits and being willing to change their habits.
That I am not seeing. Just lots of jabbering and talking about the undeniable science.
Relatively easy stuff if you think an apocalypse is imminent like consuming far less, making stuff last longer, making stuff that's repairable at an affordable price, insulating your home, reusing your bath and shower water in the garden, massive national investment in public transport infrastructure, shared car ownership, eating less meat, stopping flying and all long distance travel, zoom meetings, working from home instead of commuting to offices, the list goes on.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gooniesmoonies4606
The brutal truth is is that a new Israel in Palestine was a solution to a problem essentially created by the Western powers at the time, including Russia.
Antisemitism was on the march across the already deeply divided European continent in the early 20th Century, particularly in places like Germany and Russia, and many European Jews were looking for an escape route.
America, the UK and others were reluctant to take in more Jews than they already had in any great numbers and Mandated Palestine, a recent spoil of the First World War and the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, seemed to be the best way to fulfil the brief and minimise the problem. Domestically, at least.
A narrative helped along considerably by Judaism's strong historical connections with Palestine, although there were no significant numbers of Jews in Palestine until the late 1920s.
Israel, of course, has subsequently gone on to flourish, but it couldn't ever have done so without continued Western support.
The US, I believe, was quite late to the party when it came to supporting Israel as the penny slowly dropped there some time after WW2 quite how useful a friendly outpost could be in a restive oil rich region often largely hostile to America's interests.
1
-
@gooniesmoonies4606 The brutal truth is is that a new Israel in Palestine was a solution to a problem essentially created by the Western powers at the time, including Russia.
Antisemitism was on the march across the already deeply divided European continent in the early 20th Century, particularly in places like Germany and Russia, and many European Jews were looking for an escape route.
America, the UK and others were reluctant to take in more Jews than they already had in any great numbers and Mandated Palestine, a recent spoil of the First World War and the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, seemed to be the best way to fulfil the brief and minimise the problem. Domestically, at least.
A narrative helped along considerably by Judaism's strong historical connections with Palestine, although there were no significant numbers of Jews in Palestine until the late 1920s.
Israel, of course, has subsequently gone on to flourish, but it couldn't ever have done so without continued Western support.
The US, I believe, was quite late to the party when it came to supporting Israel as the penny slowly dropped there some time after WW2 quite how useful a friendly outpost could be in a restive oil rich region often largely hostile to America's interests.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I've been doing my job for 21 years now.
It's, on the face of it, a very small world but, in reality, it involves literally tens of thousands of interactions in a year.
I get to hear about all manner of illnesses, family issues etc and I try and be discreet.
Two unprecedented (in that extensive period) and unexplained incidents that have caught my attention recently are 1) a customer's 42 year old son found dead in his bed from a massive heart attack with absolutely no previous history in the family and 2) a previously extremely fit 23 year old naval rating who suffered a massive stroke that put him in ICU for weeks and which he will likely never fully recover from.
These aren't made up examples.
Similarly, last year, a customer's husband was effectively coerced into having the Pfizer jab by the game software company he worked for having tried to hold out. Next day he ended up in an ICU with doctors apparently at a total loss to explain what caused his admission.
I haven't seen his wife since, but I believe the long-term effects have been life-changing for them.
Now I don't have a problem if people like you elect to take these entirely experimental, essentially untested jabs - they are jabs not vaccines which is why the CDC recently changed the very longstanding definition of what a vaccine actually is - but forcing other people to take them, which I suspect you would from your comments, is an unforgivable position.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mikemcgurk1447 And Mr Farage, living in a democracy as we do, would have been perfectly at liberty to carry on his campaign.
As to how many people would support him after such a referendum result would be pure conjecture, but I suspect it wouldn't have been significant.
Most leave voters, I believe, would have accepted that democratic result for what it was, unlike many remainers.
In a way that encapsulates the difference in mindset between the two groups and as epitomised by the likes of Campbell.
Some regard the process and the result it delivers as sacrosanct, whether they agree with it or not, and some, unfortunately, do not....
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1