Comments by "Eric Astier" (@ericastier1646) on "Highly Compelling" channel.

  1. THey need to talk more about homo naledi the primitive ancestor specific to subsaharan africans only.
    4
  2. You should do an anatomy of blk people. I see significant anatomical differences they have compared to other humans and everybody pretends it's not there, such level of hypocrisy is unbelievable just for political reasons. For example their hips present an odd angle that allows me to recognize any of them by only looking at at short window at their hip with 100% accuracy. Their short torso and long legs is also specific. And no contrary to the often shamelessly said lie you do not find their specific anatomy in the diversity of white people. And there are many more. Not the least i can tell with 100% accuracy if a blk people was in a room even 30 min ago if the room was not ventilated, by the body odor they have. This is real and factual.
    2
  3. Please make a similar video about the Subsaharans who live to this day. The neanderthals are our grand grand.. fathers and mothers. But not in the Subsaharans genome. Also i see much bigger differences between subsaharans and us than between neanderthal and us. Subsaharans have a much more ancient and archaic hominid in their genome called homo Naledi than us. Before you give me politically approved nonsense paleontologist consensus think about the following : If you select randomly ten subsharans and ten europeans. Cover them all with skin tight clothing to hide their skin pigmentation, also cover their hands, mix all twenty randomly and film only the lower body one by one, I can with 100% accuracy tell you which ones are subsaharans because of their posture showing the lower spine sticking out like a vestige of quadripedal motricity that Europeans do not have. And this is the case for subsaharans of any age. Furthermore anybody can do that if they block their political conditioning that the malevolent media is disseminating and embrace the truth. And there are many other differences. You should make a video on the subsaharan hominid, not just about our ancestor the neanderthal which is closer to us than subsaharans.
    2
  4. I totally disagree with the neantherdal view as more separate from modern humans than sub saharians. All these reconstitution appearance are completely subjective art, the cranium are not that differentiated from modern humans and the difference is no bigger than with sub saharians. Neantherdals were at stone age just like 20th century sub saharians. They were not any less advanced than 20th century sub saharians.
    1
  5.  @michaels4255  That is a rather weak argument. Until the 13th century China was isolated, so was africa and the americas. Go back a couple of hundred thousands years and it's reasonable to think that human groups that ventured far could end up living in isolation for thousands years. In fact if happened for subsaharians after modern groups left africa. Subsaharians evolved separately anywhere between 200,000 to 300,000 a little bit longer and it would have become infertile with modern humans. Very much like Neantherdals which it must not be forgotten WERE also fertile with modern humans.
    1
  6. protects from large cats claws avoiding getting a blinding injury which means starvation.
    1
  7.  @mrbaab5932  Not wrong. You're politically motivated and dishonest. it's you who is wrong and trying to pass along a fraud. The recent Akey’s statistical method detected 5 times less neanderthal in Africans than Europeans. And by Africans it did not separate north Africans population who have back to European back to africa migration genes from the last 20,000 years from the subsaharan Africans (South of the sahara) who have nearly zero neanderthal ancestry. Not only this but subsaharans have a much more ancient archaic hominid dna in them homo Naledi which was not bipedal and compared to which Neanderthal was much more evolved. Subsaharans are a different hominid than us. And your arguments can only be dishonest and politically motivated for trying to cover the truth. What the study also showed is that European and Asian modern humans interbred with neanderthal more than 100,000 years ago and not with ancient africans at that time. the smidget amount of remigration to africa that gave North African some neanderthal genes only occured less than 20,000 years ago. So yes they are a different hominid. And you can study the experience i described an verify it to be 100% true. You can compare skull differences, they are different and primtive. But there 's alway politically dishonest paleotonlogists that are paid to say otherwise and take population samples including north africans to alter the result. Do the study with only Subsaharans and it's obvious.
    1