Comments by "Eric Astier" (@ericastier1646) on "The Japan Reporter"
channel.
-
4
-
Let me add my own experience as a westerner as i have been integrated in some Korean groups and took 3 years of Korean language and I had one long time Japanese girlfriend and one near girlfriend Korean female friend. <After watching the video > Wow your sources are excellent i have barely anything to add. I only want to warn westerners against dating both Japanese or Korean women. We westerners get a wrong impression especially about Japanese women. Due to Japan having no Christian religion like Korea, the moral values like sex in Japan will be very odd and treacherous. Most Japanese women think it's ok for their bg/husband to go to prostitute as long as they pay for service while Westerners women will find this abject and cause for breakup/divorce. Also Japanese women cheat like crazy (and men too). Even when my past relation with ex Jap. gf was going well, one day that she thought i wasn't in town she invited a local burly white mechanic who fixed her car for dinner in her apartment and i walked in by accident ! They were only just starting to eat at the table but not doubt she was planning to get fucked by him. He left, and was actually a decent man that she tricked and was embarrassed when he saw she had a boyfriend. I fucked her instead but that's what you can expect from Japanese women even (especially) the most decent looking ones. They have no morals in the western sense and zero conscience. Also they will not tell if they don't like something and leave in total ignorance. You will feel you never really know her even after years.
About Korean women, they're extremely superficial and will date foreign men only on materialistic reasons such as he has a prestigious position or profession. Korean are extremely chauvinistic for a woman to date a foreigner goes against almost all Korean rules. I found it extremely hard to get a Korean gf despite putting 10 times more effort and years into it than with Japanese. I learned Korean 3 years at the university level courses, was a member of an all Korean church group for 3-4 years, courted many of them in the most gentlemanly approach possible, had a few first dates, only one woman had repeat date and we ended up in her apartment one time where i received the most confusing mixed signals from a woman ever. You judge, i still don't know what went in her mind. We got in her apartment she prepared a spaghetti meal for me in her kitchen in exchange for me having cooked for her in a previous date then as i was eating she said, i want to take a shower now and left me there alone eating her meal while she went to shower. At that point we had only flirted once in a previous date (not that day) but it was mostly me, she had not returned those physical gestures of affection like caressing. So there i was, thinking what the heck is she doing, does she wants me to walk in and find her naked in the bathroom under the shower etc or was she just acting extravagant and would have shouted if i walked in the bathroom ? I decided to act as a gentleman and not risk it, but i think it probably was a mistake and that was her odd way to stride to something romantic.
She sure did not give me that chance again, and when i got more adventurous in a later date touching and caressing her legs gently she remained jaded and pretended it was not happening. We continued to have this double meaning relation even once i totally confessed to her by messaging that i wanted her and it drove me crazy and she replied she wanted to dated me again. But it never happened as i don't believed her anymore. That's what will happen with a Korean woman, expect level of frustration to be very high.
When you think you have made progress, she will act like she just met you. Also she will give you the typical "You didn't ask me to be your girlfriend, i didn't know" even when she already know you badly want her.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
Nabuto you are on the wrong track. All racial discussions are heavily tainted by political dogma brainwash which is not scientific but strongly political were a minority that holds government and media power will impose its totally arbitrarily "rules" about race. This is strongly happening in the West where a very small minority who is in control of currency financial aspects has decided completely politically that they want the dark race (i will use the word dark to actually mean b because this platform is heavily politically biased) to be privileged, and the european race to be prejudiced and defamed. You have to take a huge step back out of that clout of political brainwash pressure if you want to have a sane discussion on that topic based on science and truth, not political dogma.
First of all, the concept and definition of race and species is man made. We do see the differences between people of different world regions so we kind of think, right there is something like that. But in fact race and species are not a hard line separation, it is a gradual progressive grey area between the two.
During evolution a specie can split into two or more different species by geographical isolation in very different climate of the world. BUT they will still be able to breed together for a long time even as they are already very differentiated. It is a progressive slow continuous split, not a sudden one. The concept of race is a fallacy. It only represents that state where one specie has split over hundred thousands of years (and occasionally remixed partially and then split more). The result is what we call race but some race like the dark race have ad mixture up to 20% of hominids that are very primitive that asians and europeans do not have in their genes. So the way the words specie and race are used by humankind who invented them is a fallacy. Currently different species is considered as "cannot breed together". But this is already proven a fallacy, in the evolution of species branches of evolution would have splits were two new species could breed together for hundred thousands years longer before becoming mutually infertile. Thus race is actually related species. And race is a nonsense word invented for political means. I consider what we call race as separate species of hominids that have very different kind of gen ad mixture from past extinct hominids like different homo erectus. We know Asian and Europeans have neanderthal genes but we also know recently that only the dark race have homo Naledi gene an extremely primitive and ancient primate up to 20% in their gene. Here the political brainwash wants to block that scientific information because it does not suit their political manipulation goals.
The point is species of humans is a reality, not race, and Japanese are justified with reality to discriminate against species that have different level of primitive hominid ad mixture in them. This debate must be purely scientific but as soon as you talk the scientific truth you will gets political noise and nonsense by people who have been brainwashed or who have a political agenda such as privileging the dark specie as a shield against the european specie that are being oppressed by a small minority in power. The word racism is probably the most fraught with abuse, reversed, that it is meaning less. Since race itself is nonsense (only species exist even if they can interbreed) then the word racism is also nonsense. The question instead is should we consider the difference between species as important to avoid making mistakes. Yes of course. You wouldn't mix two different species in a zoo, without much caution or not at all and we are animals as well. The same applies ! Refusing to see the scientific reality only leads to problems.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1