Comments by "Eric Astier" (@ericastier1646) on "Views on Japan's Racial Attitudes Today" video.

  1. Nabuto you are on the wrong track. All racial discussions are heavily tainted by political dogma brainwash which is not scientific but strongly political were a minority that holds government and media power will impose its totally arbitrarily "rules" about race. This is strongly happening in the West where a very small minority who is in control of currency financial aspects has decided completely politically that they want the dark race (i will use the word dark to actually mean b because this platform is heavily politically biased) to be privileged, and the european race to be prejudiced and defamed. You have to take a huge step back out of that clout of political brainwash pressure if you want to have a sane discussion on that topic based on science and truth, not political dogma. First of all, the concept and definition of race and species is man made. We do see the differences between people of different world regions so we kind of think, right there is something like that. But in fact race and species are not a hard line separation, it is a gradual progressive grey area between the two. During evolution a specie can split into two or more different species by geographical isolation in very different climate of the world. BUT they will still be able to breed together for a long time even as they are already very differentiated. It is a progressive slow continuous split, not a sudden one. The concept of race is a fallacy. It only represents that state where one specie has split over hundred thousands of years (and occasionally remixed partially and then split more). The result is what we call race but some race like the dark race have ad mixture up to 20% of hominids that are very primitive that asians and europeans do not have in their genes. So the way the words specie and race are used by humankind who invented them is a fallacy. Currently different species is considered as "cannot breed together". But this is already proven a fallacy, in the evolution of species branches of evolution would have splits were two new species could breed together for hundred thousands years longer before becoming mutually infertile. Thus race is actually related species. And race is a nonsense word invented for political means. I consider what we call race as separate species of hominids that have very different kind of gen ad mixture from past extinct hominids like different homo erectus. We know Asian and Europeans have neanderthal genes but we also know recently that only the dark race have homo Naledi gene an extremely primitive and ancient primate up to 20% in their gene. Here the political brainwash wants to block that scientific information because it does not suit their political manipulation goals. The point is species of humans is a reality, not race, and Japanese are justified with reality to discriminate against species that have different level of primitive hominid ad mixture in them. This debate must be purely scientific but as soon as you talk the scientific truth you will gets political noise and nonsense by people who have been brainwashed or who have a political agenda such as privileging the dark specie as a shield against the european specie that are being oppressed by a small minority in power. The word racism is probably the most fraught with abuse, reversed, that it is meaning less. Since race itself is nonsense (only species exist even if they can interbreed) then the word racism is also nonsense. The question instead is should we consider the difference between species as important to avoid making mistakes. Yes of course. You wouldn't mix two different species in a zoo, without much caution or not at all and we are animals as well. The same applies ! Refusing to see the scientific reality only leads to problems.
    2