Comments by "Eric Astier" (@ericastier1646) on "My TYPICAL Moscow Apartment, With PRICE 👀" video.

I never knew Scottish people. Much better and nothing in common with the British except the language. Much more down to earth, honest and friendly. Your voice breathes wholesome honesty and goodness of the person.
226
@alexanderchepak2009 yeah that is what you think, although they voted by referendum to remain a part of the british small kingdom. What surprises me most on youtube is the number of presomptuous fool who think they can correct others. Don't assume anything about someone you don't know.
7
@daphnethurlow5388 no they are not. They were Scott first, then englanders forced them into an empire name big brittany (great is a false translation). Which by the way comes from the French word Bretagne and the whole England island is in fact a Plantagenet French nobles land possession. The Irish too were invaded by the englanders but got out, the Scotts will too eventually. You can cry now. Just like the Roman pretended their land included Germany and England bu now it's just Italy. The same with big britain it will end up being just england.
5
@rmdomainer9042 No they're not. You can repeat your wish to yourself it's still a lie and I and the world scoff in derision at you. Remember when your grandma thought that all Indians are in the "british raj". That does not exist, neither does the "british isles" empire.
4
@rmdomainer9042 Let's see if i can imitate your pedantic sophistry and come up with a similar corollary.. Nobody who's educated or clever would ever doubt on Ireland not being british. Except like Scotland, they aren't. One is the land of the Irish the other the land of the Scotts. Like the "British Raj" was an invented name for a colony. So is "British isles". Colonial times are bygone. You are an englander and that is about it.
4
@patshepherd784 They are the invaders why should they.
2
@lilyandrose8557 i don't drink and i don't do drugs. Never have.
2
@E.K.2003 No, it's like the Hans claiming Tibetans are Chinese when everybody and history clearly shows Tibetan culture is older than Han and always been separate. Englanders make claims about their invented empire, doesn't means the concerned nations agree.
2
@E.K.2003 But we are.
2
@E.K.2003 Not at all this thread is boring me.
2
@E.K.2003 My grammar and spelling tend to degrade when faced with people who don't deserve my higher focus and attention. Besides, it's my 3rd language. So unless you are as fluent as i am in your 3rd language (if you have any) i suggest you bury that arrogance in your ineptitude.
2
@E.K.2003 I never expected that much reaction to my original post. There is no smoke without fire as the saying goes. There wouldn't be so much talk if it was nonsense, it clearly is a very palpable real issue.
2
@SomeOne-p6f No that is deliberate deceptiveness; double-dealing and hypocrisy you know full well that british is intended by people like you as a national identification like Germans or French or Spanish. Furthermore, british is a derivative of Britain which originates from Bretagne in France. Therefore it has nothing to do with far north Scotland. In the same way Ireland is not part of "big" Britain.
2
@SomeOne-p6f Wikipedia is an open text encyclopedia bazaar. it's not a solid authoritative historical reference. In fact despite the obvious interested attempt by many englishmen to blur the connection between the word Britain and the French Britany or Bretagne it is indeed the origin of the word. As the Plantagenet a noble French family inherited the Island from Normand blood line and it was under the jurisdiction of Bretagne hence Brittany. Later it was extended to included Wales and became "larger Britain" which was mis intentionally changed to Big Britain which at the time meant large and not great. Obviously the whole topic is at the heart of an interested bias from the English side and will be falsely refuted.
2
@SomeOne-p6f Who said the French Bretagne (Brittany) did not exist before either French or England existed as a country ? It did exist, the normand conquered it too before conquering the Albion island. The name Brittany was extended to include England because there was no England back then and the home of the Dukes and nobles who owned the island were on Bretagne continental soil. As for the Encyclopedia britannica it is written from the modern Englishmen point of view and bias, i would not trust it.
2
@rmdomainer9042 Naive fool i didn't miss that, i denied it for the likes of you to get it hammered in.
1
@jontalbot1 That wishful thinking has been repeated for centuries yet it still is only your wishful thinking and elizabeth and her buffoon son and that of other englanders. Corsica is an island attached to France but Corsicans do not consider themselves French either.
1