Comments by "Gakusangi" (@Gakusangi) on "Count Dankula" channel.

I feel bad for the wife. By the time this finally came around, she was totally dependent on him, and with several kids to take care of. Not her fault she was abused and forced into the marriage with him.
144
He doesn't need the money, never did. He doesn't want it, never has. This isn't him proving anything, it's him doing things his way.
19
@tuvin33 She was a teenage girl when he set about harassing, stalking, and threatening her to try and force her back to him so he could marry her, continue to molest her, and get out of rape charges. A PERSON, regardless of age or gender or anything else that's hounded like that would break down and make decisions that couldn't possibly make sense to anyone outside of them and had no idea what they were going through. Don't be quick to judge, she's as much a victim of this monster as anyone else was.
10
@tuvin33 Again, you're thinking like someone that's been hunted down by this psychopath, having their friends and family threatened, AND ignoring that the police WERE called. The police came after this guy several times and only ever made ONE arrest, and then the courts always dropped his cases. Who would they call? This is the same guy that got away with shooting at least two people that we know of.
10
Oh man, never a dull day when Charlie is the topic XD
4
@jakk1hundo553 Look, just because you have some bad experiences with gals going after jerks and not giving you a chance, doesn't mean you can bring that here like it's the same thing. It's NOT the same thing. This is about psychological trauma and being the victim of a predator, not dating bad boys. I'm done with this pointless conversation since you clearly can't distinguish between the two. I wouldn't throw your two cents around here too much, because you're likely to look very foolish.
3
@jakk1hundo553 Wow, that uhh... that's a hell of a hot take there considering she's a victim of him, bud.
2
How much was the fine again?
1
@patheticghost7853 Is this in reply to me or @None One ?
1
@jakk1hundo553 I don't think we did. Dankula made it very clear she was hounded until she came back to him, talked about how it was nonstop and eventually broke her down. So... yeah.
1
@jakk1hundo553 I adamantly stand by my statement, you have a very opinionated view of female behavior with regards to romance when this isn't the same thing, and regardless of if you call yourself a pink horse with white polka dots it's ignorant, insensitive, and flat out incorrect. Yes, sir, ma'am, or alien, YOU look foolish.
1
@jacksoncordray1593 You are NOT talking about a "normal", "fully-there" person. You're talking about someone whose abuse started when they were a young teenager, who was easily manipulated, intimidated, and not operating on a mature, adult level. You're also disregarding who this is she was a the victim of. This man got away with two attempted murders and various other crimes, the authorities were entirely ineffective, so what could she have done? She probably didn't even realize that by going back to him, she would end up getting him off on the one charge that might've stuck, instead she was just trying to make him stop chasing her and threatening people she knew. She was scared and traumatized... does that sound like "normal, fully-there" person to you? Please stop trying to apply the "outsider looking in" logic to this, you have no idea what she went through. And you're leaving out vital information to why she came to her decision and thought she had no other choice. You're acting like she some well-adjusted adult when she's anything but that.
1
@jacksoncordray1593 So you by your logic, a child running back to their abuser isn't a victim of abuse anymore. They made the decision to go back even if they knew they didn't like what was happening and knew it was wrong, so they can't be a victim anymore, right? Oh, and before you try to say this was different. She was a teenager when she went back to him, she was even younger when he started abusing her. She is a child. And wouldn't you know it, when someone grows up into adulthood, in an abusive, psychologically manipulative household, they don't grow up to be "normal, well-adjusted" adults either. Please stop trying, this is a really stupid hill you're trying to die on here, and it only shows up little you know about the effects of abuse and the relationships cultivated by the abuser.
1
@jacksoncordray1593 That's not some hard counter to my point. My argument is based on actual research. It isn't like she was a consenting adult who came back years later and cried foul or something.
1
It's funny you use that pedophile example, because the Protect ACT literally is worded vaguely like that, where they basically get to decide what qualifies as child porn, even if it's complete fiction (such as a manga or a rule34 drawing) and charge someone as in possession of child pornography despite the fact that no child was present, no victim was defined and no crime was really committed, but because they view the imagery as "indecent" is grounds to charge them to the full extend of the law for possession. NOTE, this is despite the fact that the Supreme Court already made it clear that no-one should be charge for something that doesn't include a real victim, this new addition was meant to "lighten the burden" placed on law enforcement for having to identify a child being depicted in pornography so the charges could be placed, so now the child doesn't even have to be a real living person for them to press charges. So it's really on-the-nose example you have there.
1
Blue Gender is an Anime.
1
Hey... that's a Trauma Team t-shirt from Cyberpunk 2077.
1
Earned a like for your Raid ad.
1
Figured Elizabeth Bathory would have inspired the character Carmilla a bit.
1
You know, in many countries where food is scarce and starvation is high, they envy us for our ability to have food preferences. Seriously, they would do anything to have so much food that you could ignore an entire food group (like meat), where what you ate was a matter of choice and not necessity. In addition, being omnivorous was a means of evolution allowing us to survive because we didn't have to be picky about the food we ate, we could survive on almost anything, which helped us climb to the top of the food chain and last long enough to become a dominant species. It also allowed us to be anywhere on the planet where vegetation or prey animals might have been scarce because as long as there was some of one or the other we had food. This is basic evolution and nature that is being treated like it's solely been dependent choice and base on vanity. We're all just animals, animals consume other animals- animals consume whatever option they have for sustenance. We're not breaking any natural laws here, this is how the natural cycle works.
1