Comments by "Serenity" (@SerenityM54L2SAM5L5N1) on "" video.

John Oliver and his audience is the embodiment of "you're racist. I can't prove it, but these outlier racists watches you, so you must be racist, I think...uhhh...let's move on..racist!" So embarrassing to see this low level of intellectualism.
23
Just because he's rich, doesn't imply that he's subservient to the elite or to the rich. Biden and the leftist media on the other hand, are doing just that. Pleasing their billionaire donors, doesn't question anything, upholds unwanted status quo. Some can see that, it doesn't seem as if you can. Tucker isn't a part of that elite, he's one of the MAIN and most influential critics.
14
@R0seshad0w Yeah. Coming from the UK to visit and live in a country such as the United States, to then go and make a profit by shaming the country, making fun of how its built, making fun of those who built it and those who contributes most, and labelling every moving creature as rayzist, is a treasonous thing to do, arguably. He'd be a high priority on the deporting list.
10
It generally doesn't exist. It doesn't exist on a systematic level. Tucker is the opposite of a racist. Hilarious to see people fake "cry" about it and make up things to ensure that their narrative is true though. Just like how the pseudo-scientific activists claims that qualitative data gathered in the social science field is worth taking seriously. Nobody in the real world does.
9
Are you deliberately playing obtuse or is it done involuntarily? Surely you know what he meant. That part of the world isn't as developed, literate and there's ZERO pull factors to these nations for several reasons. That's why Tucker is trying to preserve the state of affairs in his own advanced and high-tech country that millions are trying to enter on an annual basis.
9
@tibot4228 Could throw the same question right back at you. Is it a sign of anger to comment politics on a public platform? Is it a sign of anger to call out your ideologically biased remarks on a platform which leans to the left?, if misinformation is being spread? No sane person would say yes.
8
@jasont340 You've got no clue about who Tucker Carlson is if you're seriously comparing him to a swindling, rambling and lost individual such as Alex Jones. Nice try of discrediting him though. It didn't work, as per usual, and no serious person will buy into it.
7
@skyleradams5566 Sounds like you're offended by this "oppressive" system to the point where you keep on (lying) talking about it. Erasing criminals and substantial societal burdens that keep on infringing upon others whenever they receive the chance event though they've been given opportunity to participate in society, ISN'T oppression. Also, nice racist dog whistle there. DNA is not a route you want to go down.
7
@TheGamefreak346 Maybe because most people aren't taking advice from an angry socdem treasonous entity such as Oliver prior to watching Tucker.
7
Far from it. We need more people like Tucker. The West wouldn't have such a big problem with crime, division and social unrest if more people were like Tucker. But yeah, let's slam the patriots and those trying to create a civilized country rather than those who time and time again acts entitled, commits lawless action, disrespects the laws, and behaves like heavy burdens to society. Apologists such as yourself are the problem and should be handled via the Limbaugh approach on how to tackle liberals.
5
@arcturionblade1077 Not everything is "alt-right". Imagine being this brainwashed and simple to the point where not paying absolute lip service to every idea is seen as "alt-right". Laughable. And I see that you're using a bunch of conspiracy theories there. That invalidates your own right to ever call out conspiracy theories, unless you want to come across as an unprincipled, opportunistic hypocrite.
5
@jasont340 Cringe. Your hate shines through. Do something about that. Enter an anger management program.
4
@blanched1192 I probably know more than you about the middle east and Africa than you do. I've followed Al Jazeera, WION, Reuters and news reports from that part of the world on a daily basis for years and have thoroughly studied it from many independent sources. So yes, I'm aware of the state of affairs over there and can see what Tucker meant. Quit the false assumptions
4
@jasont340 It doesn't make sense to anybody who knows what they're talking about. For those who've got no idea what Tucker stands for and maybe the apolitical, they may think that you've got a point because the populace incited by Oliver will today cheer on what you're saying. But in the real world, they'd be laughed at.
3
@andrewkruse7899 Oh they do. Unless you're willing to paint out more than half of the US as unserious or stupid even though they likely are significantly more educated and informed than the remaining part of the US.
3
Glorification of violence and insults. That's all that you "tolerant" people have.
3
@akmal94ibrahim Trump and Tucker has many flaws, but they stand way closer to my own ideological position than Sanders. Sanders is opposed to most of what I stand for. I'm not opposed to a 3rd positionist stance on the economy which Sanders may stand behind as well, but his willingness to sympathize with left-wing anarchists, rioters, socialist ideals, equalization, abolishment of natural hierarchy, drug liberalization, opened borders, and feminist doctrines regarding how people ought to behave and what ought to be accepted, is completely unacceptable to me. Sanders is therefore seen as a big threat, high on the list.
3
Most news organizations in the USA are unnuanced, biased and a threat to their own country. They're unironically the enemy of the people. That applies to most Fox News hosts as well. Although Tucker is decent.
3
Still haven't heard any convincing point as to why Tucker Carlson would be a "terrible" or a "racist" person. Watched the 24 minute segment and has read a couple of comments. This channel is such a joke. Bunch of partisan hacks trying to assassinate others characters because of their own bigotry and inability to break down arguments.
2
@aldoingermany How so?
2
@randomstuff-qu7sh Yeah. Most of the corporate world and the media are moderates, upholding the status quo with a slight progressive/liberal angle, which supports the democratic party (and like 50-75% of GOP members). There's system critics in the DNC and in the RNC, but from polar opposite perspectives. My own nationalconservative and statist worldview is closer to these GOP members compared with the DNC; which is why it's easier for me to sympathize with those actors. DNC leftists and AOC's squad may be critics of the system and establishment as well, but they oppose everything I stand for, apart from the belief that money shouldn't dictate politics or that the capitalist system ought to work for everybody with certain regulation incorporated where it fits.
2
Anyone who's unaware of Tucker's own positions, his show and what he focuses his time on might despise him after this biased and harsh hit piece. Any apolitical and ignorant individual may fall for it. But I decided to note every flawed aspect of this video for anyone who's interested in more of a neutral analysis. Nobody has seen it, so here you go: This may be one of the most unfair and depraved character assassinations that I've seen on this show. So many false insinuations and conclusions about another person that you politically disagree with. I made a short list summarizing the contents and turning around John Oliver's own points back at him: Socialists watches Oliver on a frequent scale, does that mane him a socialist? Why is John Oliver mocking the children involved in creating the Tucker show just because they're involved in making the Tucker show? John Oliver is mocking Tucker Carlson's intellectual levels, even though the latter person likely exceeds Oliver's quota significantly. John Oliver mocks Tucker Carlson's personal dating life. Talks about whiteness and race all the time in a way that fits his artificially created points. Who's the racist? Tucker talks about that we shouldn't see race. Qualifications and once's character is all that ought to matter. Just like what MLK suggested. Oliver mocks that entirely. The vast majority of black people are not afraid of being killed unless they're up to no good. Oliver muddles the debate by twisting and turning on what Carlson is saying, by taking clips out of context to make him look bad. Typical unfair tactic. Oliver to pretend that the undeveloped and non-literate world is developed and literate to break down a point that everybody but Oliver understood. Oliver not only understands where the violent BLM rioters are coming from, he loves and supports them. On the other hand, the outlier Jan. 6 riots and why they occurred shouldn't be interpreted in an objective and honest way according to Oliver. Also changes the factual narrative of why it happened, to make the demonstrations look worse. Tucker almost never talks about race. John tries to improperly claim otherwise. Guilt by association by proxy is common to see in this episode. One extremist watches and likes Tucker Carlson, therefore Tucker Carlson must be an extremist in secret. I could go on and on regarding how much of a fallacy that is. Nothing of what Tucker said is outrageous if you try to understand what he says after having removed your maliciously tilted and ideological glasses.
2
@Don_tHack False. Alex Jones is a brain ded conspiracy theorist, crazy, and hasn't got a really coherent ideological position. Tucker is eloquent, consistent, and has a real concern for America from an ideological perspective. Tucker talks about what's important in a way that makes sense. Alex Jones isn't respected by many. He's seen as a joke.
1
@Bedlam83 Calling out your attacks and unsubstantiated dismissals of political dissidents on the "right" isn't satire, no. This whole comment section comes across as a satirical comedy show though. Full of people unaware what a white supremacist is and why Tucker may be one (he isn't, at all). Thanks for the laugh.
1
Censorship is nice huh.
1
The Viper Congrats, you got ONE single day that you can talk about in your little lefty anarchist circles. Good one. ONE DAY! That's like 0,00001% of the violence and damage inflicted when compared to the BLM rioters who plundered, looted, burned things down, attacked 50+ federal police officers in D.C, and destroyed hundreds of businesses for months, because a criminal died. Also, do you have a hard time staying on topic? Sounds like it.
1
@shardator The West has its advantages and its problems. I don't think you'd be particularly pleased if I brought up the several good things about Asia or Europe if the topic of conversation was about the flaws of Asia/Europe that we ought to rectify. /facepalm
1
Your fake tolerance will be the end of every stable civilization. No wonder why the East, Asia and their allies laughs openly at individuals using your fallible rhetoric. Throwing the term "racism" left right and center to stifle debate. Claims that tolerance of bad behavior, indecent behavior, riots and unregulated migration is a dignified value worth striving for. The rest of the world treats that way of thinking as a laughing stock.
1
This video will probably be bombarded with condemnation and a brigade of people voting it down for the biased hit piece that it is. Can't say i'd blame them.
1
This may be one of the most unfair and depraved character assassinations that I've seen on this show. So many false insinuations and conclusions about another person that you politically disagree with. I made a short list summarizing the contents and turning around John Oliver's own points back at him: Socialists watches Oliver on a frequent scale, does that mane him a socialist? Why is John Oliver mocking the children involved in creating the Tucker show just because they're involved in making the Tucker show? John Oliver is mocking Tucker Carlson's intellectual levels, even though the latter person likely exceeds Oliver's quota significantly. John Oliver mocks Tucker Carlson's personal dating life. Talks about whiteness and race all the time in a way that fits his artificially created points. Who's the racist? Tucker talks about that we shouldn't see race. Qualifications and once's character is all that ought to matter. Just like what MLK suggested. Oliver mocks that entirely. The vast majority of black people are not afraid of being killed unless they're up to no good. Oliver muddles the debate by twisting and turning on what Carlson is saying, by taking clips out of context to make him look bad. Typical unfair tactic. Oliver to pretend that the undeveloped and non-literate world is developed and literate to break down a point that everybody but Oliver understood. Oliver not only understands where the violent BLM rioters are coming from, he loves and supports them. On the other hand, the outlier Jan. 6 riots and why they occurred shouldn't be interpreted in an objective and honest way according to Oliver. Also changes the factual narrative of why it happened, to make the demonstrations look worse. Tucker almost never talks about race. John tries to improperly claim otherwise. Guilt by association by proxy is common to see in this episode. One extremist watches and likes Tucker Carlson, therefore Tucker Carlson must be an extremist in secret. I could go on and on regarding how much of a fallacy that is. Nothing of what Tucker said is outrageous if you try to understand what he says after having removed your maliciously tilted and ideological glasses.
1
mainscore Are you completely lost? What does that have to do with anything of what I said? Fool
1