Comments by "Serenity" (@SerenityM54L2SAM5L5N1) on "" video.

I think he's a decent guy with good intentions. But standing behind a criminal, terrorist thugs and people using the circumstances to push a radical agenda is highly questionable. I assume that's his position after extrapolating his stance based on the perspective raised in this video, and based on current circumstances in the US:
4
@Dillon-117 The majority of the saboteurs and rioters are part of the protesters, not white supremacist groups. That's a politicized conspiracy used to justify the questionable acts of the blm movement and its sympathizers. Don't try and put the blame on the police, the governmente or far-right individuals when the culprits are in front of you.
1
@asterling4 The guy was rightfully dealt with by the police after having committed a crime. At such a point, I don't believe that they're a human being with rights anymore. So taking a stance where you're defending this culprit is very shady and unwarranted.
1
@elderlyoogway Picking the case of George Floyd in order for the culprit to represent one's movement may've been one of the most foolish ideas available. The guy was a serial criminal with no intention to contribute. He was a danger, a threat, an objectionable individual with zero respect for authority. Along with ignoring orders and having a bad medical history, that's what resulted in his death. Defending this guilty person is beyond me. Wow. As a side note- How did you find out my comment history on this particular channnel? That's interesting...
1
@elderlyoogway I do believe that it was justified, yes. The person resisted arrested, did not intend on cooperating, were high on drugs/alcohol, were unstable, had a long criminal history and clearly no plans to enrich our country and communities. I do believe that the police should be able to do what precisely they wish if they possess credible proof that they're dealing with a criminal wrongdoer. Independent commissions can be established to make sure that no abuse of power is included, that bodycams are used, that a mass surveillance system is implemented and that the violators of their oath/profession are being held accountable. And with such a system in place, those who threatens our nation can be handled swiftly, effectively and justice can be served. That a criminal's death resulted in massive uproars, sabotage, acts of terror and so much screaming...is almost unbelievable. It couldn't become more ridiuclous.
1
@Dillon-117 The footage showcases that the person did resist. He tried standing still when the cops were moving him in front of the police vehicle. He went up and down, indicating its uncooperative nature. The guy was a violent, threatening, fraudulent culprit who should've been dealt with a long long time ago.
1
@asterling4 I don't agree with all of the constitution. And many agree with that notion as well, considering the countless number of amendments installed. We deprive criminal of freedom, the right to vote, the right to equal opportunity etc. I think that route is fully justified and necessary for our nation's safety, health and to let it thrive.
1
@kaylenpeterson1773 Advocating censorship? Very, very typical. Encourage an open debate instead of suppressing every uncomfortable viewpoint.
1