Comments by "Serenity" (@SerenityM54L2SAM5L5N1) on "Vox" channel.

  1. There are plenty of non-religious countries with similar flawed systems, poverty, corruption and poor leadership. The correct ideology and economic system isn't in place, and subversive elements still infiltrates Lebanon (openly, without backlash). This is what has to be rectified. Opportunity need to be created, starting up businesses should become attractive, criminals/terrorists should be removed and a zero tolerance policy towards corruptions, negligence, misconduct, etc, must prevail.
    141
  2. A fierce conflict full of combatants and mercenaries from several fronts sparks throughout the worst pandemic in our modern times. Coronavirus: Hello???
    94
  3. Duterte isn't one of them. He's raised the nation the past years. Promising development, apart from his occasional socialist leanings and advances to China.
    78
  4.  @acoolonthebeat  You're probably the same type of person that supports refugees entering the country on a massive scale, humanizing and legitimizing their existence. Or the type of person upset about separation of criminals/their kids at the borders. To then go and completely stamp on innocent kids. Incredibly hypocritical. If you believe that a child with a beating heart inside of a woman's stomach, as conscious as a 1-4 y/o child outside of the stomach, is a "clump of cells", you should be prevented from having children because I doubt you'll care for them. Wow, what a reprehensible view.
    69
  5. They've learned But they maliciously ignore what they've learned, to sustain GDP growth at all costs and preserve their despicable political ideology.
    66
  6. The majority of women didn't even wish to have to right to vote.
    62
  7.  @thejesusaurus6573  Or because YouTube and every media company focuses on what's happening in the US. Hard to ignore stories about the US. But then again, why would you?
    55
  8. Most women didn't even want to have the right to vote because it led to an increase in uncomfortable obligations such as serving in the army and having to take more responsibility in society. When redundant modern day feminists (who pretty much only exists for extremist reasons and or to promote the act of slaughtering the unborn, abortion), are being criticized, it's to encourage women to take their motherly responsibility, be traditional, loyal, civilized, and realize that they've got all the rights in the world instead of complaining about trivial non-issues.
    49
  9.  @fiya..  The Dutch probably did more for the people than the current Indonesian government and would do more today with their higher and new standards. At least colonialization resulted in control and prosperity to a degree, exceeding the bad circumstances seen in many Asian and African countries today. Has to be said that some colonizers took things too far as well.
    32
  10. >Implying censorship is imposed by rightists on the internet, and on Vox. The complete opposite is sadly true.
    30
  11.  @penelopebunce  The discrepancy of what career that men and women choose isn't the result of targeted ads, but rather due to biological differences and a natural culture that has placed women and men in certain boxes based on what works and based on one's capabilities.These ads are in place because it's effective to target people based on their interests. Removing ads won't change a thing in society. Not to the better. Not with a noticeable effect.
    28
  12. @Sultan Abdulhameed II What the heck are you talking about? Israel had nothing to do with the demolition, and are merely trying to defend themselves whenever Hizbollah or some other reprehensible Lebanese terror group attacks Israel. Don't create these made-up and fallacious scapegoats, that's despicable.
    27
  13. It is true, but it can be applied to pretty much any activity or conversation.
    26
  14. Studies have proven that the use of radical and violent action to create political change can turn the majority against one's movement. So it may not be as optimal and defensible as some people claim (especially not BLM; a movement started up because serial criminal died, zero reason to stand up for such an incident). Militant terrorism isn't defensible, and certainly not violence, almost ever.
    24
  15. If you think this is a US exclusive issue, I've got news for you.
    22
  16.  @birdy4112  In fact, the West is the LEAST racist place on earth. Most nations are so much more racist than the US and Europe, but they don't receive any criticism? Why? Even slavery exists in Africa, 40M individuals are assessed to be slaves. The US had 800K slaves a century+ ago, yet the US is still in the spotlight. Something is fundamentally wrong with the public's perception, the media and the focus by some politicians.
    18
  17.  ROFLCOPTER  "patriarchy", lol. If such a structure existed, if it per definition was bad, it'd have changed long ago (the actual term's meaning prescribes ideas that aren't present in the Western world today, so why bring that up). What exactly are you complaining about again?
    17
  18. What's that supposed to mean? Segregation and "racist" laws are long abolished. Assistance and support is distributed to these minority groups, and equal opportunities prevails in the US. What more are you specifically asking for? The ability to riot and destroy America further without ending up jailed? Instead of second chances, third chances?
    17
  19. When you prioritize following Sharia law and punishing every heretic for some questionable justification rather than finishing off building the first stages that creates a stable civilization, you know you're in trouble.
    17
  20. Not really. Many of these vandals, rioters and extremists has created a war-esque situation, which warrants a militarized and brutal crackdown by our federal authorities in order to restore peace and remove illegal elements from our country. Downsizing these aspects will only create an increase in crime, illegal activities and lawlessness which benefits the individuals who deserves it the least.
    16
  21.  @frials4757  Can't respond properly? Then don't interact. Useless.
    16
  22. Why are you insinuating that the Republicans blocked the stimulus bills when Democrats blocked plenty of packages? When Democrats incorporated provisions about immigration and other contentious political areas unrelated to the pandemic in order to shoehorn their political agenda? Not very neutral there.
    15
  23.  @nataliagarciahess3749  PP is being heavily defunded. Eventually full-on abolished if everything goes according to plan. Good job on supporting the inhumane elimination of the vulnerable unborn though, I guess. Something to feel proud about? That dehumanizing hypocrisy is abhorrent to see from this side of the political spectrum. They love to talk about their humane tolerance and moral high ground. But it's all empty words.
    15
  24. It has been fixed in many regards. These days, the pendulum has swung way too much to the other side, where bad behavior, crime and discriminatory affirmative action policies are swept under the rug by BLM, every progressive corporation and the naive public.
    13
  25. That arbitrary slogan can be used to defend the most atrocious acts. Boko Haram, IS, Hizbollah, Hamas, etc, uses such ways of thinking. Horrific.
    13
  26. Until you loosen it to the point where the obesity suddenly disappears. If you build out an amount of highways and roads that exceeds the available demand, surely congestion won't be an issue anymore? Although I'm sure there are issues with cost and practicality to take into account.
    13
  27. "If we don't have a shared sense of reality, I don't believe that we're going to be a liberal democracy much longer." Oh no
    13
  28.  @alexs1640  Most of the cases (even in the video) are justified. Irresponsible women marrying criminals. Convicts behaving dangerously. People defying police orders. The police isn't an issue, the rebellious revolutionaries and criminals are.
    13
  29. What failure? The "failure" of a police responding after a filed report, to then arrest and render a serial criminal harmless? That's the "failure" that the whole irrational world are screaming about right now. Think about that for a second.
    12
  30.  @user-mi5xq8zj7u  What the?? Projecting? Do you know what that means? I'm referring to articles regarding the topic back in the early 1900s. Has nobody done their research before attempting to enter the debate on this topic? Wow.
    12
  31. It works wonders in Asia. The only actors who are tired are the criminals and abusers themselves, and their self-serving opinions do not matter for obvious reasons.
    12
  32. Sounds like a society taking their moral responsibility by rejecting polygamy, preventing people from having hundreds of promiscuous partners, preventing the spread of disease, and building up a society where you plan ahead, value life, and dress/behave in a civilized manner is prioritized highly. Abortion is not and will never be a "right".
    11
  33. Not just black individuals suffered in the fight for change. There's almost been a disproportionate obsession in that idea lately.
    11
  34. No knock warrants can be justified in a lot of cases. When catching dangerous individuals such as murderers, black market operatives, terrorists, junkies and those who destroys our country. In the Breonna Taylor case, though, they seem to according to all available parameters have messed up badly which should result in ramifications and rectifications. Such outlier cases doesn't warrant a dismantlement of our police or casting suspicious over those who protects the civilized law-abiding citizens.
    10
  35.  @tou7331  No. Because they didn't want to take the responsibility and handle the obligations that it entailed...
    10
  36.  @WeMakeItRainz  Is it her house if she didn't contribute anything, doesn't pay for it, and disrespects the rules? Not exactly.
    10
  37. If the handmaid's tale had any similarities with Poland's situation, the ongoing protesters would be killed off by tanks in a couple of seconds. These laws would be strengthened and implemented immediately (they've been delayed/withdrawn) and all dissent would be crushed. Protecting life isn't oppression. At all. It's the only sensible option to take unless you're advocating from the perspective of an evil witch willing to destroy reproductive systems, the traditional family fabric, the country's moral pillars and fundamental values that keeps people alive and well.
    9
  38. Yeah, we need to criminalize the groups trying to create conflicts, disruption and lawlessness. The police are mostly doing their job 100% correctly. They are arresting and placing criminal fools in jail. But somehow people have managed to place out the idea that the police are the scapegoats here. Laughable. BLM, anarchists, Antifa, criminals and its lefty supports are the ones that we should be worried about and counter by all means. Not the law-abiding public. Not the police.
    9
  39. ...why? The side-effects are well.-established and clear.
    8
  40. Yet most people manages to live, sustain and flourish under the system. It's been engraved for centuries that the government shouldn't have too much say or fund (often) redundant institutions/public programs at the taxpayers expense. This leads to lower taxes and the sense of justice and incentivization for the average American. Cutting one's own paychecks to pay for areas in the country that probably isn't very desirable, isn't something that people are willing to go through with.
    8
  41. Because nobody really cares. It's not that big of a deal and affects no one.
    8
  42. Abolishing healthy meat consumption won't be an option. But endlessly expanding land into unknown territory where risky species live, indulging in mass deforestation, and keeping up a large illegal wildlife trade with no environmental/health regulations isn't safe whatsoever and should be countered.
    8
  43.  @dancfc6023  Because these criminals were uncooperative, resisted arrest, posed a threat, were dangerous people and destroyed our country. The police had, in the vast majority in cases, to step in roughly.
    7
  44. Watch out for the conspiratards inevitably flooding this section because they aren't caged yet.
    7
  45. Based on these individuals voting patterns the past decades, did we become better off by these sort of amendments if we take a honest look into it? Are Democrats solving the domestic issues seen today?
    7
  46. I'm an atheist and I support state intervention to protect life and uphold decent moral values by forcing men and women to behave respectfully and responsibly. Abortion laws has nothing to do with religion (well, it doesn't have to), it has to do with the state's and society's task of protecting innocent life while condemning high-risk and abominable conduct by people that don't deserve to thrash society in the way that they're doing if constantly (not exaggerated) getting abortions is on the agenda.
    7
  47. Restricting lobbying would probably entail infringing upon freedom of speech and basic liberty. Any organizations, corporations and private citizens has the ability to influence elections. Powerful corporations may of course have an increase in power due to its size, capital and prominent position. But should they arbitrarily be forbidden from participating in election campaigns and negotiating with legislators? How would that be rolled out?
    7
  48. Equal opportunity still exists. People have the ability to pick the right choices no matter their background. Many end up choosing the wrong paths, leading to criminality. We can't turn the other cheek to that, we must prosecute them and remove them from the country. Increasing the budgets for schools and healthcare won't prevent these subversive elements from polluting and infiltrating the country.
    7
  49. #1 way? No. How would public transport help if there are no opportunities created by the economic system and political policies in place?
    7
  50. @Roben Bou Mansour No that's not true.
    7