Comments by "Serenity" (@SerenityM54L2SAM5L5N1) on "" video.

The majority of women didn't even wish to have to right to vote.
62
Most women didn't even want to have the right to vote because it led to an increase in uncomfortable obligations such as serving in the army and having to take more responsibility in society. When redundant modern day feminists (who pretty much only exists for extremist reasons and or to promote the act of slaughtering the unborn, abortion), are being criticized, it's to encourage women to take their motherly responsibility, be traditional, loyal, civilized, and realize that they've got all the rights in the world instead of complaining about trivial non-issues.
49
Studies have proven that the use of radical and violent action to create political change can turn the majority against one's movement. So it may not be as optimal and defensible as some people claim (especially not BLM; a movement started up because serial criminal died, zero reason to stand up for such an incident). Militant terrorism isn't defensible, and certainly not violence, almost ever.
24
@frials4757 Can't respond properly? Then don't interact. Useless.
16
@nataliagarciahess3749 PP is being heavily defunded. Eventually full-on abolished if everything goes according to plan. Good job on supporting the inhumane elimination of the vulnerable unborn though, I guess. Something to feel proud about? That dehumanizing hypocrisy is abhorrent to see from this side of the political spectrum. They love to talk about their humane tolerance and moral high ground. But it's all empty words.
15
That arbitrary slogan can be used to defend the most atrocious acts. Boko Haram, IS, Hizbollah, Hamas, etc, uses such ways of thinking. Horrific.
13
@user-mi5xq8zj7u What the?? Projecting? Do you know what that means? I'm referring to articles regarding the topic back in the early 1900s. Has nobody done their research before attempting to enter the debate on this topic? Wow.
12
@tou7331 No. Because they didn't want to take the responsibility and handle the obligations that it entailed...
10
@WeMakeItRainz Is it her house if she didn't contribute anything, doesn't pay for it, and disrespects the rules? Not exactly.
10
@reytoxeron5899 My comments here has nothing to do with women. Although I do object and see a huge issue in their naive voting habits. They vote for mass migration, culture shifts, depleted welfare, increase in crime, indecent conduct, affirmative action, unfactual ideas & open tolerance, which creates worry, instability and something that women despise. Why are they voting against their own interests?
6
@orbitrons6731 No innocent protester has been tear gassed. Only those committing crimes, contributing to extreme chaos, and defying orders. Get your facts straight if you're gonna discuss politics instead of framing it into a delusional depiction that zero objective sources can back up.
6
@MrJacobElias Are you serious? Lol. They * didn't * want the right to vote because it would force the women to engage in societal activities, obligations and behavior that were uncomfortable, required effort and weren't particularly feminine. That's why they opposed it. This has nothing to do with their contemporary vote frequency lol
5
@jacktheflying I'm in my 20s. Good job, wrong on both parameters there.
4
@Max-ns8lc Never said that they shouldn't. Although, do you agree upon their destructive voting habits? We wouldn't have to worry about the left if only men voted. Often overlooked.
4
@ernestcelestine5428 The earnings gap is on women solely to fix, not the society, not the state. If they're willing to strive for greatness and earn more, they have to represent themselves as a valuable asset on the market and receive the rewards accordingly. It's nobody's fault than their own for earning less.
3
@iruns1246 Read articles about it from the 1900s were they conducted surveys about it. The Atlantic made published a piece on the topic back then. Nobody is stating that their rights should be taken away, I'm just questioning the historic revisionism, motives, behavior, and lack of legitimacy in the movement back then. With that said, is it positive that the majority of women vote left? Would we be better off with or without universal suffrage if you look at it in these terms?
2
@vegetable1495 Your "facts" aren't true nor accurate. The instigators of these protests, acts of vandalism, and subversive rioting hasn't been started by the police. The culprits are the citizens that decided to connect oneself and join these backwards movements. Every "incident" of police using force or intervening against these people, have been justifiable, have been involving heavy criminals/anarchists/terrorists, and hasn't been portrayed in the way that you and your associates falsely explain it. BLM started because a drug-abusing and aggressive person charged up against a person working for a branch within the police, one could say, in a community in Florida. The protector did therefore have to shoot the hooligan. Same goes for the Floyd case. A serial convict that had been in jail over and over again. A fentanyl user (A-class drug), who constantly ran into cops based on his despicable actions. He resisted arrest, had committed another crime (surprise surprise) and the cops did therefore do what they could to render the guy harmless. Without OD'ing on drugs, resisting arrest and having a poor medical record, he might've been alive. But the guy was a very problematic and dangerous person. Such an icon to incorporate within one's movement huh? Such an angel.
1