Comments by "Serenity" (@SerenityM54L2SAM5L5N1) on "Thoughty2" channel.

  1.  @gordonlawrence1448  Especially the feminists, emos, and promiscuous ladies. Stay far away from em'!
    71
  2.  @QuickNETTech  We aren't in need of any new pronouns. "He/she" works totally fine and any normal person knows when to use which phrase. Giving in to people looking to normalize idiocy isn't a good idea.
    42
  3.  @zootsoot2006  Yup. AOC isn't a communist/socialist, although she leans in that direction in many ways. The worrying part is that many people in her constituency are young, ill-informed and populists who unironically believes in socialism. They believe that Venezuela's strivings are legitimate and that its system is actually functionable, and blames all the failure on "US sanctions". Imagine if these sort of people received influence in the US, by blaming everything on the cops, right-wingers and those trying to improve the nation. We'd end up on a direction leading to a nation resembling the hellhole that Venezuela is.
    37
  4.  @FatMCSteve  Nope. That's an oversimplified, fabricated and misleading lie. Venezuela are in big trouble due to their policies that stifles innovative tendencies, business development, creates stagnation, hyperinflation, and mass poverty with zero opportunities. The government is filled with incompetents corrupt officials with zero sense for what's right or efficient. Socialist leanings has thrashed the nation and resulted in its people suffering, leading to mass exodus.
    36
  5. Gonna have to emulate that pun 🤣
    35
  6.  @FatMCSteve  Right, but AOC and many of her supporters has a positive view of socialism and would in a heartbeat steer this nation in such a direction if given the opportunity. That's been apparent.
    26
  7.  @og4372  Every socialist states hasn't only failed because of US sanctions. And the sanctions are implemented due to the global and domestic destruction caused by the socialist nations. The corruption, violations, and unjust ideals that are imprinted within these horrific societies.
    26
  8.  @professionalhimbo  Style, elegance and strength is looked down upon today in Europe and NA because of the Nazis.
    19
  9.  @RagingWhoremoans  Heard his sympathizers and descendants lives in South America these days.
    10
  10. So many Alabama jokes, so few jokes about Islam, even though it's a way more common *phenomena' within that religion and its countries.
    10
  11.  @sumoslap1973  The greatest threat to our nation are politicians with bad values, enabling the destruction and infiltration of our nation. And it's clear which party stands for such ideas.
    9
  12. What background song are you using? I like the melody.
    9
  13. I wonder how accurate those stories about ancient Rome really are. At least they're captivating.
    9
  14. Pretty sure most animal empires are the biggest bullies, if we compare them with the civilized part of humanity. There's respectable, peaceful and contributory individuals out there.
    6
  15.  @altrag  What speech is "purely aggressive" and who gets to decide on that? Pointing out crime rates? Not giving in to advocacy groups looking to shoehorn and normalize severe mental illness in different shapes? Claiming such criticism and political views to be "purely aggressive" inn order to silence its existence is very antidemocratic and unjust. Facts, science, reason and civilized ideas should be encouraged, not suppressed. But on the other hand, I can agree when it comes to harassment and bullying, a tactic tolerable that both political sides resorts to. That should be restricted. And that would heavily hit the side looking to be the language police, funnily enough.
    5
  16. Highly tractioned video, trending, and because it's interesting!
    4
  17. These treatments wouldn't be funded or approved if people weren't so easily deceived. Humanity is only further damaged by these pseudoscientific snakeoil, a global ban would be appropriate.
    3
  18.  @hakeemolajuwonBESTROCKET  Which is why that policy is applied in some dictatorial nations, with positive results. Many nations should adopt that idea, frankly. If it's applied properly and fairly.
    3
  19. You're* Don't get how people spell this incorrectly so frequently
    3
  20. The cases in the US described as "police brutality" are mostly criminals receiving a valid taste of their own medicine, after infringing upon others, ignoring orders, and threatening the cops. 100% justified, and can therefore not be labelled as "police brutality" unless you're looking to shoehorn politically motivated sentiments while defending criminals. Ridiculous how far these talking points where people are playing defence for serial convicts has spread.
    2
  21. Respect for pointing out the hysteria, irrationality and insanity seen in the US right now. People claiming that "police brutality" is a widespread issue "impacting innocent people based on race or institutionalized injustice", even though it's highly overblown and 99% of those affected are dangerous criminals.
    2
  22. So you're putting no blame at the economic system that encourages stagnation, inflation and no growth? Seriously? And you're complaining about the bias and inaccuracy of others? The nation is in a massive upside-down mess, and it's not only due to the US....Venezuela's leadership caused this themselves.
    2
  23. Because of poor leadership, socialist intervention on the market, corruption, solely relying on a volatile oil market, printing cash, and prioritizing the corrupt leadership instead of the people. The nation isn't suffering because of US sanctions only, no. And those sanctions are very very warranted.
    2
  24. Comparing Portugal with Venezuela?
    2
  25. One anecdote doesn't make it safe. Or perhaps you're used to illegalities going on based on the behavior that you just describes as if it's normal lol
    2
  26.  @michalvalta5231  No wonder why movements critical of those regressive cultures are growing rapidly. The incest, child marriage, barbaric rituals and blind belief in tooth fairies doesn't grant positivt results, especially not when the religion in question barely has reform to adjust to the digital and modern world at all.
    2
  27. Many of these characteristics are deeply engraved within human nature, greedy, bloodlust, aggressivism, impulsivity etc. Would be desirable to remove or encourage these roots to be removed by social pressure, state sanctions and harsh ramifications which may adjust the human psyche and instinctive tendencies in the end. Something to strive for.
    1
  28. FBI, a fantastic and important concept for national security, but the organization has become a joke these days. Illegally spying on political candidates. Using politicized documents and rumors as evidence to justify unconstitutional practises. Not acknowledging the BLM threat on our streets.
    1
  29.  @sakken95  Agree. 2A, universal freedom and lack of zero tolerance has resulted in a lot of pain for the US. Systematic racism, discriminatory practises or police brutality are political ploys used to build up an image that doesn't reflect reality by radical groups, however. Many have fallen for these propagandists, leading to the public focusing on the wrong issues.
    1
  30.  Rus Lemus  China isn't in the same state nor as communist as Venezuela, CCP has mostly abandoned those values.
    1
  31.  @anonymousviewer2165  For using drugs, selling drugs, engaging in violence and contributing to the destruction of the Philipphines, sure.
    1
  32. Damn those are some graphic blood images. Should throw up a warning!
    1
  33. Sanctions that are justified due to the appalling actions taken by Venezuela's own government. Not responding to what they're up to would pose a stronger threat to every civilized nation. And no, the nation isn't suffering only due to the sanctions. The main reasons is the leadership's own naive policies, hostile attitudes and bad priorities, not US sanctions.
    1
  34. What's the name of the background song kicking in at like a minute in?
    1
  35. The background melody kicking in at 4:04, does anyone know the name of it? It's quite beautiful
    1
  36. So this guy's most definitely a right-winger, with all that PC criticism. Commendable to take such a stance!
    1
  37. Every organism breaks down and fades away in the end.
    1
  38. China? Pandemics are global so it doesn't matter where you live when the outbreak starts spreading.
    1
  39. If all of these loopholes were completely closed, how different would the world look? Would fewer investments and successful corporations exist? Would countries be better off? Are these tax evaders solely using their extra cash for personal gain with little impact on the economic cycle?
    1
  40.  @artonio5887  So according to your own worldview, what were the reason for their collapse? And don't dare bringing up "US sanctions" like every insane communist-apologist tries to do.
    1
  41. Remove the suspenders brother
    1
  42. The belief that the wisdom of the crowd always results in the right answer or proper solution is a common seen fallacy, known as argumentum ad populum. As in people appealing to a popular idea and using its popularity to verify its authenticity and truthfulness.
    1
  43. It's clear at the end. Probably sympathizes with some of his policies, is opposed to the way that many criticizes his every move, and possibly opposes some of the questionable things that he's done.
    1
  44.  @YoungenColin  Exactly...these comments are absolutely insane and out of touch with reality.
    1
  45. Please leave the suspenders behind. Too many farmer vibes :(
    1
  46. Beautiful explanations and parallels. Truly capturing.
    1
  47. Islamic countries has huge overrepresented problems with incest still to this day.
    1
  48. Imagine defending the brutal dictatorship in Venezuela. What an inhumane mindset to occupy, for selfish reasons I imagine. What's your objection to his accurate statements?
    1
  49.  @altrag  > I can agree when it comes to harassment and bullying "Apparently you think you get to." What's that supposed to mean? Tucker Clarlson is generally invoking factual narratives and presents a relatively calm and collected stance when discussing politics. Opposing the radical elements of the left by berating its actions and highlighting the wrongdoings, isn't aggressive. Sounds like you're placing the blame on the wrong source there. Sure, his tone can be condescending and self-righteous every now and then, but aggressive to the point where censorship should be applied on the guy? Certainly not.
    1