Comments by "Serenity" (@SerenityM54L2SAM5L5N1) on "Do We Have to Destroy the Earth to Save It? | 5 Minute Video" video.

Many misleading sentiments presented in this comment section and the video. If you care about preserving biodiversity, wildlife and a clean environmental, you can't be in favor of releasing the current high amount of emissions by using natural gas, fossil fuels, and other methodology to extract power-fuelling material. The wildfires, floods, and animals being killed by land expansions/deforestation is way higher than the amount killed by wind turbines or solar panels. I'm a right-wing statist personally and I'm willing to acknowledge that the current right doesn't have any concrete or effective solutions to the issue of climate change based on their frequent way of reasoning presented in the video, and here.
13
Aren't the people who blow up the danger of batteries and non-recyclable the same who tend to advocate for the use of nuclear energy? How is that waste dealt with and is it a problem? Not necessarily. The same would apply here. Renewables is the main pragmatic and sustainable solution to the issue of climate. Right-wingers should acknowledge this and attract voters by it, in the same way that I'm personally doing.
5
@melainewhite6409 I watched the video and zero persuasive arguments were involved. The total amount of animal death would far supersede the animal deaths by renewables. I wonder if he's supported by oil corporations or if he's just a conservative partisan with a limited purview. I say this as a right-wing statist, not a leftist.
1