Comments by "Serenity" (@SerenityM54L2SAM5L5N1) on "LegalEagle" channel.

kebab REMOVER Sounds like equal opportunity and equal treatment under the rule of law to me. A fair system with zero association to a dysfunctional economic system.
15
If Legal Eagle and anyone for that matter values the rule of law, they better not have shown support for the rioters who've defied the rule of law and terrorized america since May because of a lawbreaker being handled in a deserving fashion. It's hard to find serious consistency in politics, I wonder if Legal Eagle is able to provide some and surprise me.
11
We'd be a lot more secure and civilized if Congress and SCOTUS had less power. Sure, power can always be abused. But i'm sure many also argues that Congress and many establishment career politicians are abusing their powers by acting like regressive roadblocks to needed change. Trump got a limited amount of stuff done because of our stifling institutions.
6
So that's why his net worth sits at the top level in the whole USA, with plenty of property, accessories and homes? He was elected because he's a successful businessperson, known in entertainment, and then joining the political scene and shaping politics into something for everybody, including the casuals.
6
@tarod3 The country is in a mess politically though. Although they'd be worse off with Labor in power, hence why the party performed the worst that it ever has since 1920 in the recent election.
4
@godlygamer911 It doesn't matter if it's an organization or not. It's a decentralized movement full of terrorists using sabotage and violence to get forward with their revolutionary extremism, usually taking advantage of situations where a criminal hooligan has been rightfully neutralized and crushed by the police. Threatening and assaulting anyone going against you, the police, and burning down private property isn't something that any sensible person in their right mind can defend. Yet this thread is full of apologia, suggesting that these fools are fighting for a good cause or that they're equivalent to WWII soldiers (WWII soldiers would never want to be associated with these low life felons).
3
@QuestionEverythingButWHY When are you gonna stop spamming the same useless quotes that aren't relevant nor adds anything to the debate? What's the goal by doing this over and over again? Attention? PR? Advertising something?
3
@geraldgrenier8132 Some "fascists" may have been present at Charlottesville. But it's incredibly rare to see the vandals within the decentralized Antifa "target fascists". They just target anything that moves and anyone that they disagree with. None of their illegal behavior is acceptable unless you're an alt-left undemocratic extremist.
2
Did you complain when Obama pardoned thousands of drug addicts and murderers? What's the problem in pardoning people that were trapped in a despicable witch hunt that has been debunked and is seen as a disgrace to american history?
2
@Tracy I responded to the original poster than seems upset with the presidential powers. That seems upset that don't seem to see a problem with the fact that many innocent people, including Trump, were persecuted by the exceptionally shady Mueller investigation. Legal Eagle didn't even mention this in his biased video. I suggest doing some independent research prior to commenting and jumping upon the angry bandwagon.
2
@TriangleChloros I'm aware that many of the Trump critics are apologistic of Obama and are totally fine with the abuse of presidential powers if thugs/junkies are acquitted. But they're not fine with the acquittal of innocent people that Mueller and every leftist conspiracy theorist improperly went after without reason to do so. That stance and hypocrisy is reprehensible.
2
Are you opposing Microsoft taking over TikTok or a straight up ban on TikTok for security reasons, because you've got a personal negative attitude about Trump? Or what are you suggesting?
2
@Julia-lk8jn Democrats are supported by felons infiltrating our electoral system, voting Blue. People without IDs, qualifications or a legal status, votes Blue. Dems do all they can to create more weakened and lenient electoral laws, to let everybody vote. The more questionable actors without qualifications that votes, the more power the Dems will seize and the stronger of an ochlocracy we'll receive which will result in a polluted and demoralized country. Law & order, pure morality and civilized behavior isn't something that the Democratic party supports, either. So I don't really mind what a republican president or right-winger does. They have all the moral and rational right to stay in power, with all of these factors in mind.
2
This is why monarchies and autocracies exists :') No disputes, no challenges, no questions about future holders of powers!
2
Why don't you comment?
2
The right thing for the democrats isn't the right thing morally nor the right thing for the country. Those calling to pack the courts because the GOP has used their legal prerogative to fulfill their oath, isn't democratic, proportionate nor defensible.
2
Jim from the Office
1
Making sure that only civilized, law-abiding, adults, americans who've lived in the country for a long time (maybe several generations) and those who've contributed to nation building are eligible to vote, isn't "voter suppression". It's the right thing to do for fairness, transparency and to prevent dangerous infiltration of the country. Every country should do the same. Comparing these voter security policies with slavery is laughable. And what does someone's race has to do with anything? Why would a non-white person perform better in the WH? They wouldn't, if you solely base their qualities on irrelevant factors such as background.
1
@ssusanchef1047 Source that solely commenting leads to the videos being recommended and pushed higher for non-subscribers?
1
@RobGcraft It isn't. The bias and fabricated concern comes across as so dishonorable. But we all know that this channel isn't politically neutral, because the viewerbase has pushed the host to a certain political side.
1
@godspeedhero3671 This is why the right always will despise and work against you. These useless responses without substance, reason or logic pops up every time, and the dumb mob embraces it. Be quiet if you can't handle the truth or hold a debate.
1
Have you analyzed the BLM riots and the politicians, media pundits and private citizens that overtly incited its extremist presence?
1
Is it just me, or does the anger and contempt shown in the beginning of the video come across as very forced and artificial?
1
Are you seriously complaining about pardons for people that ended up prosecuted in an unethical and unconstitutional investigation, for actions that weren't illegal, after having been illegally spied on by the FBI which the director even admitted to? Wow. While Obama commuted and pardoned 1,700 actually heavy convicts in every sense of the word. Convicts that deserved to rot in jail.
1
Let's just create a one-party state while we're at it and prevent businesses and traitorous elements from infiltrating the political process altogether.
1
A symbolic joke, in other words. Nothing will come out from this lawsuit. The lawsuit doesn't hold any grounds since it's obvious what type of information that Bolton would be prevented from publishing, information leading to jeopardizing outcomes for the US. If Bolton had any real ammunition and evidence to concretely try and remove Trump, he would've expressed it. He already has released all available attacks that he occupies.
1
When certain political groups with a tolerant/freedom-fighting basis starts normalizing incest, you'll start receiving backlash for insinuating that it's repulsive to engage in such relationships. Wouldn't be surprising if that ever becomes reality. I mean, it's already intertwined in many religious cultures.
1
Laura, you're asserting the same standards for BLM and other subversive movements with no concern for the law, correct? Or am I wrong?
1
Michael Cohen is a traitorous and convicted liar. Wouldn't take anything of what he says seriously based on his shady track record and flip flopping positions.
1
Firing the weak and confrontative defense minister, Mark Esper, was justified to its fullest degree. Not sure why you're suggesting otherwise. The guy is literally not willing to do what it takes to restore and maintain order. And this guy is supposed to be a "defense minister" in the United States under a 'law & order'-administration.
1
@Wasserkaktus "Legal woes", or political persecution by Trump critics exploiting every loophole in the judicial system. Most of the claims and accusations against him are baseless, have been debunked and some will be looked at. This channel and its viewers appears as if they're indulging in reverse McCarthyism under the disguise of the legal system.
1
Take it easy with elderly abuse.
1
Do people seriously enjoy listening to this sharp hatred and bias? Was this channel direction the lawyer's plan all along?
1