Comments by "pinball1970" (@pinball1970) on "Professor Dave Explains" channel.

  1. ​ @joshuapray I agree, they were not calling him stupid in science speak they were calling him a liar.
    24
  2.  @amerilovangel333  Do you not like science?
    23
  3.  @AB-80X  Tour shouted far louder than Dave on at least 4 occasions. Got to give him that.
    21
  4.  @amerilovangel333  Or just a flat earther or creationist?
    14
  5. Definitely a floater
    10
  6. Hindu culture? I have to say not so bad. The people are beautiful they really are. We can power through a few things.
    8
  7.  @cameronwalker294  So, you do not know the difference between Evolution and Abiogenesis? Also James Tour is a creationist liar and See Dave exposed him. It's that simple
    5
  8. Wow, Kent is like a caricature of a creationist. He combines pseudoscience with religious nonsense to produce a kind of creationist plasma. It is hard to know where to start because all of his starting points are wrong. Anyway Dave, do us proud.
    4
  9.  @imdarealani  Sounds right. No way you can have that level of expertise in so many diverse fields.
    4
  10.  @JulioHernandez-jq9wg  Right so you didn't watch the video and you are not educated in science we get it.
    4
  11.  @amerilovangel333  Can you point out what the differences are?
    3
  12. I have an UG in applied Biology and i am baffled how someone not trained specifically in Biology (UG, PhD) can dismantle all these DI guys referencing their 'works'and published real relevant papers in such detail. TOE is vast in terms of corpus of evidence, papers and the nuts and bolts of the Theory itself from Darwin to the present day. Similar story with the OOL presentations and James Tour take downs. Not even mentioning tutorials in all the other stuff. Amazing.
    3
  13.  @NinjaMonkeyPrime  He called Tour a liar and a fraud and then illustrated why, using slides and direct quotes demonstrating exactly that.
    3
  14. ​ @bungiecrimes7247  Question by all means but learn about the subject from the published literature and textbooks first. At least the basics. Reason being your question may be based on a false premise to begin with.
    2
  15. As a drummer I can say this is very funny.
    2
  16. Hi Dave, I have enjoyed your videos so far but I do have criticism at 4.37. An advanced qualification in Geology would have some relevance with palaeontology. I am not saying he would be anywhere near the same level as an anthropologist, biologist or palaeontologist but the two disciplines have over lap. Dating and identifying layers for example. Anyway you may get to that. EDIT (about ten seconds later!) Just to add though, I am not saying what he claims at 4.51 is not complete BS. I will continue....15:11 ok so they are complete liars. Disgusting that kids could be exposed to this garbage. If I was involved with Johanssons group I would sue for slander. 16:12 ha ha on the same page!
    2
  17. Apparently only writing something on the board has significance? Dave was very calm. He should have taken the schematic and just wrote it out. A level students know about amino acids and peptides. Can't remember if they are expected to be able to know structure in details. Certainly Uni first year. I would have impressed the hell out of this idiotic audience at 19 with my amazing powers of recall! All those structures off by heart? What a genius! No, what was important in this debate was showing what is going on the field right now, not first year Biochemistry.
    2
  18. Prof Dave? Click. James Tour? Click, click click!
    2
  19. Ok so it's a worm that looks like NOT infects the penis. 20 seconds in I'm good to go. One less thing.
    2
  20. 12 minutes in and can't do anymore. Idiotic stupid nonsense. Chess with pigeons.
    2
  21.  @nunya_bizniz  I left comments on the channel after watching some of this explaining that the content is nonsense. They were not happy.
    2
  22. 25.27 Weis: "common sense, the god gave us ..." That explains it.
    2
  23. ​ @ashikurrahman1000  Just read some basics on this. Google is your friend.
    2
  24. Great break down. Tour is a very inconsistent liar.
    2
  25. ​ @3luckydog What historical evidence? You mean like the historical evidence for Mohammed and Allah?
    2
  26.  @Selendeki  Dave attacked him specifically for telling lies about the field. He illustrated specific comments, direct quotes from Tour that showed he was making things up. Dave focused on those things. Tour drew some structures on the board, no idea what that was about. First year biochemistry students already have this knowledge. Sugars, bases, fats, amino acids so simply drawing a couple of these organics did not demonstrate anything. Dave simply pointed out ACTIVE research and publications in the area.
    2
  27.  @eliumolina4240  Yes some kids were traumatized by this stupid backward superstitious nonsense. Luckily he pulled himself away.
    2
  28.  @joshuashepard583  Or are you saying it is ok for Tour to tell lies and Dave was wrong to call him on it?
    2
  29. Popcorn
    2
  30.  @jdos5643  There are ideas on this in cosmology, none of them include Jesus.
    2
  31. Good catch Derek, this guy is great, I've just found him. Very concise and a good speaker and debater.
    2
  32. Ok so my criticism was pretty insignificant given the rest of the video. What you are doing is great work. Keep it up, I'm subbed
    2
  33.  @NinjaMonkeyPrime  They don't have examples, they never do. Just another scientifically illiterate, creationist liar.
    1
  34. I empathize. I think New York five star hotels are fake, also hot women from movies. Two weeks there should do it. If they exist tell them i dine at 8.
    1
  35. But he knows hip hop so thats the same as knowing science so lets give Jamar some respect. Right
    1
  36. Holy shit this guy is crazy. He is just making crap up.
    1
  37. I was thinking the same
    1
  38.  @sideeggunnecessary  Yes I am!
    1
  39.  @amerilovangel333  Can you explain this difference or not?
    1
  40.  @MayasCraftWorld  Cool, so if you agree with him you can answer my question? What is the difference between science and $cience?
    1
  41.  @MayasCraftWorld  Can you divide it out? Which fields? Which studies?
    1
  42.  @MayasCraftWorld  That is not what I meant. What part of his talks do you think are wrong? The main people who do not like him are flat earthers and creationist nut jobs.
    1
  43.  @SiQuemaCuhh  No, it is nothing at all like science. If religion was like science, it would be verifiable, testable and has evidence. Science also has progress and current consensus. The exact OPPOSITE of religion. Religion is different everywhere on the planet. It is culture NOT evidence driven. You don't burn witches anymore so I suppose that is progress of a sort so I suppose some congratulations in order. EDIT, No the religious are still burning witches in Africa so I take it back.
    1
  44. They should change the name of the Dunning Kruger effect to the Lord Jamar effect.
    1
  45.  @jdos5643  This is a about the Theory of Evolution not Jesus
    1
  46. Hey I'm insulted by this. I'm a tax paying lay person and I'm certain that I mostly understood the insinuation that lay people do not understand the stuff she claimed in the previous video. Not the video itself, I think I understand that, the implications of the claims of the understanding. Obviously I do not understand the details of the claims of the understanding because that would mean all of the scientific stuff that Prof D is talking about and even he says no one can understand all of that not even the scientists. Obviously not the specific scientists who are working on that particular area of research because they would have to be dash silly to be working on an area they do not understand right? So in summary then, I don't understand most of the claims of the implications of the rebuttal to previous response but are well aware of enough to be insulted about it. Mostly.
    1
  47.  @buildingproject7199  It sounds like child brain washing which is what religion is. Especially scientifically illiterate creationist garbage. Glad he got out of it.
    1
  48.  @cameronwalker294  The discussion was not about Evolution what you on about?
    1
  49.  @tasmarkou5681  Like peoples experience with Allah and Mohammed? Vishnu? All valid right? Upshot is people experience all kinds of crap, it doesn't mean it's REAL.
    1
  50.  @Selendeki  Palatable? In terms of Abiogenesis James Tour misrepresents the field. Did you not watch the video?
    1