Comments by "pinball1970" (@pinball1970) on "Channel 4 News" channel.

  1. Goldfinga Sliverfinga yes I would like evidence that the koran is based on the word of god
    1
  2. The Koran (word) is described as a Romanized version as Quran. A little like YHWH Yahweh or Jehovah being different versions of the same word. Now can we focus? What is your evidence that the Quran is based on anything real? What is your evidence Mohammed did not just make up his revelation with an angel? Or was mad deluded a liar lying to himself, had another agenda?  Goldfinga Sliverfinga
    1
  3. Goldfinga Sliverfinga I have read it and there is zero to suggest any of that comes from a god. most of it is stolen for start you do realize that? From Jewish myths?
    1
  4. @Gez Mondean We know how those things came about, no creator needed.
    1
  5. @Gez Mondean The video is about Richard Dawkins speaking about how we can grow out of tribal superstitious practice and unscientific nonsense.
    1
  6. @Gez Mondean Do you have an argument besides calling someone you have never met names?
    1
  7. @Gez Mondean No I meant do you have 'an argument' as in a coherent discussion/ proposition? Your answer should have been, 'no.' Just rambling superstitious nonsense. The UK is moving away from this sort of primitive tribalism, perhaps you long for the days of misogyny and witch burning? Or teaching creationist garbage in school?
    1
  8. @Gez Mondean Ok. That's fine and since you are clearly as mad as a mongoose I'll bid you good day.
    1
  9.  @piertinence  What on earth are you talking about?
    1
  10.  @piertinence  Yes it is supported by Science. There are 1000s of papers from multidisciplinary areas demonstrating the facts of evolution. The Theory of Evolution explains those facts. There is not one serious single school of biological sciences on the planet that says otherwise.
    1
  11.  @piertinence  What you have posted is unscientific creationist nonsense.
    1
  12.  @piertinence  You don't understand evolution, you don't understand Science we get it.
    1
  13.  @kamrankhan-tr6lt  'Hawking' note spelling. Also no, no one is saying there are the only intelligent people.
    1
  14.  @piertinence  Your post was pretty stupid btw regarding Darwin, that's fine I really don't think it came from you.
    1
  15.  @phild249  What?
    1
  16.  @phild249  What doest Dawkins claim that I have?
    1
  17.  @honingbijtje83  Fantastic book.
    1
  18.  @piertinence  Wow, you really do post idiotic nonsense where ever I find you.
    1
  19. @Gez Mondean Eh?
    1
  20.  @peaceunion5316  Eh?
    1
  21.  @peaceunion5316  And no it absolutely does not work like that. I will give you a scenario. There are Hobbits in my garden, prove me wrong! It is up to you to prove the nonexistence of the Hobbits and by the way, whilst you are doing the proving there is a 50% chance Hobbits exist. Reason? Simple they either exist or they don't, two choices so that's a 50/50 split right? Wrong. Probability is not the same as plausibility. Is there 50% chance it will rain in the Sahara tomorrow? If not why not? It can either rain or not rain right?
    1
  22.  @peaceunion5316  Can you see my argument PU?
    1
  23.  @peaceunion5316  Oh. If I got the wrong end of the stick I apologize.
    1
  24.  @davidbanner6230  STOP SPAMMING!!!
    1
  25.  @davidbanner6230  It is not 'who' it is 'which.' Critical thinking does not belong to one person, it is a method. If I have to explain this you obviously do not use it.
    1
  26.  @davidbanner6230  Your posts are mainly stupid nonsense, that is probably why they are blocked.
    1