General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
pinball1970
Channel 4 News
comments
Comments by "pinball1970" (@pinball1970) on "Richard Dawkins on scientific truth, outgrowing God and life beyond Earth" video.
@saintmichael9736 Thanks on the music comment, that was kind of you. I want my kid to be ok have kids of his own. I live on that way. I have 20 years left maybe.
3
@peaceunion5316 He says there is no evidence for god. I agree with him.
2
@peaceunion5316 He is also not keen on the negative impact of religion on education, social cohesion, women's rights, gay rights, etc etc. I agree with him.
2
@peaceunion5316 He always says teaching people HOW to think is more important than WHAT to think. Science does the first, religion does the second.
2
@peaceunion5316 He does say critical thinking is important, it is the backbone of the Scientific method. Religion has no evidence, if it had any there would be no need for faith QED
2
@peaceunion5316 I am not making any claims by rejecting your claims of gods and goddesses. You are not making claims regarding the Hobbits in my garden. It is up to you, to give the arguments for your gods and me for my Hobbits. That's how it works.
2
@saintmichael9736 This one life is fine, I'm not greedy.
2
@saintmichael9736 Ok that's fine. Peace.
2
@saintmichael9736 I'm afraid I left those kind of thoughts behind over 30 years ago. If Jesus of Nazareth lived as a man he is long dead. The Bible has revealed one thing only, it was written and conceived by men in its entirety.
2
@saintmichael9736 Always.
2
@davidbanner6230 Yes you can teach people how to think. It is called learning.
2
@Gez Mondean We know how those things came about, no creator needed.
1
@Gez Mondean The video is about Richard Dawkins speaking about how we can grow out of tribal superstitious practice and unscientific nonsense.
1
@Gez Mondean Do you have an argument besides calling someone you have never met names?
1
@Gez Mondean No I meant do you have 'an argument' as in a coherent discussion/ proposition? Your answer should have been, 'no.' Just rambling superstitious nonsense. The UK is moving away from this sort of primitive tribalism, perhaps you long for the days of misogyny and witch burning? Or teaching creationist garbage in school?
1
@Gez Mondean Ok. That's fine and since you are clearly as mad as a mongoose I'll bid you good day.
1
@piertinence What on earth are you talking about?
1
@piertinence Yes it is supported by Science. There are 1000s of papers from multidisciplinary areas demonstrating the facts of evolution. The Theory of Evolution explains those facts. There is not one serious single school of biological sciences on the planet that says otherwise.
1
@piertinence What you have posted is unscientific creationist nonsense.
1
@piertinence You don't understand evolution, you don't understand Science we get it.
1
@kamrankhan-tr6lt 'Hawking' note spelling. Also no, no one is saying there are the only intelligent people.
1
@piertinence Your post was pretty stupid btw regarding Darwin, that's fine I really don't think it came from you.
1
@phild249 What?
1
@phild249 What doest Dawkins claim that I have?
1
@honingbijtje83 Fantastic book.
1
@piertinence Wow, you really do post idiotic nonsense where ever I find you.
1
@Gez Mondean Eh?
1
@peaceunion5316 Eh?
1
@peaceunion5316 And no it absolutely does not work like that. I will give you a scenario. There are Hobbits in my garden, prove me wrong! It is up to you to prove the nonexistence of the Hobbits and by the way, whilst you are doing the proving there is a 50% chance Hobbits exist. Reason? Simple they either exist or they don't, two choices so that's a 50/50 split right? Wrong. Probability is not the same as plausibility. Is there 50% chance it will rain in the Sahara tomorrow? If not why not? It can either rain or not rain right?
1
@peaceunion5316 Can you see my argument PU?
1
@peaceunion5316 Oh. If I got the wrong end of the stick I apologize.
1
@davidbanner6230 STOP SPAMMING!!!
1
@davidbanner6230 It is not 'who' it is 'which.' Critical thinking does not belong to one person, it is a method. If I have to explain this you obviously do not use it.
1
@davidbanner6230 Your posts are mainly stupid nonsense, that is probably why they are blocked.
1