Comments by "Khronogi" (@Khronogi) on "LegalEagle" channel.

  1. They are exclusively made to prevent someone from seeing the plate. The 'I want my plate clean is an excuse, use a hose.
    2
  2. @Chris George JR definitely did as well. Like the combination of all three of them surely is dangerous.
    2
  3. ​ @brycedaugherty9211 it's his signature that allowed them to be near the capital in the first place. And he still sent them there when he knew people were armed.
    2
  4.  @jimsackmanbusinesscoaching1344  So how is that park not a violation of the first amendment?
    2
  5.  @thorr18BEM  I don't think they've been posted yet
    2
  6. The republicans will vote against it before any argument is presented like they always do.
    2
  7. ​ @Siberial no, this is an absolute opinion, not all cops are bad, pushing that narrative is how you don't get police reform.
    2
  8.  @Delvien  Do you support innocent citizens not being murdered by police?
    2
  9.  @Delvien  Secondly, the vet was talking. Is it your opinion that we should be beaten and pepper sprayed for talking? For standing?
    2
  10.  @Sdbc1020  hes constantly encouraged that behavior. And he doesnt try to shut it down either. He may have some voice clips of him saying he doesnt support it, but this is a man who contradicts himself in the same sentence. Plus, radical right violence has increased since trump became president. He gives them an outlet. This is also the same guy who took out a full page ad in a newspaper to condemn 5 teenagers for walking in a park. This is also the same guy who was a slum lord. Dudes an ass.
    2
  11. @Augustine Brace obama would have closed earlier. And also not have absolutely destroyed the emergency plans we had in place that HE HIMSELF had set up to try to prevent an outbreak. I think the guy planning for the outbreak is doing a better job for an outbreak than the guy dismantling the planning.
    2
  12. @Augustine Brace Obama would have also listened to the experts instead of lying about everything. Obama would have encouraged testing and the development of it instead of trying to get the USA to do the entire thing itself and then have a complete lack of testing. Obama would also have held himself accountable for any mistakes he might have made. He wouldnt have stooged around lying about the event. Keep in mind under his administration they completely destroyed an Ebola outbreak by using proven methods that trump apparently doesnt believe in.
    2
  13. Good question, hopefully someone can answer this.
    2
  14. or remove the power to pardon during the lame duck period
    2
  15.  @GreatgoatonFire  It was actually commuted to what it is now if I remember correctly, used to be a longer period. And it's only like a week period of time, remember that the government is doing a lot of shit behind the scenes during those two months.
    2
  16.  @travis1240  Seeing trump in Rikers would be hilarious. Welcome back to New York.
    2
  17.  @LaCabraAsada  honey is actually useful though.
    2
  18.  @vantastic9367  Oh looks like the feds might have a practice of overstepping? Although, personally I don't like nazism in this country.
    2
  19. ​ @vandelay_industries go down that logic hole. How is tiktok a national security risk? Follow that thread then ask "Are other social media companies a threat as well?" And then ask yourself "why is it specifically this company being targeted?"
    2
  20.  @HellecticMojo  It isn't just the Republicans that would stop it in it's tracks. I don't think you realize how many people support the 2nd amendment who only vote republican because of that issue. If the democrats adjusted their firearm policy to be gun safety and education rather than overt control, the country would sweep blue. The real issue is that we aren't allowed to have talks or debates about trying to fix the issue because we have lobbyist groups like the NRA who actually don't care about the 2nd amendment, they just care about getting paid. So those groups will rile everything up and destroy any possible talk that even comes near firearms because then they can say, 'Hey your rights are at risk, better give us money to defend it.' The real issue is that the people in charge of our government are there not to govern the country and work together to solve problems as they should be, but to harvest and secure power. We can work towards solving the violence crisis in our country if the people in charge of the country actually worked together rather than bickering like children. For instance, we could entertain the IDEA of having firearm classes which would teach people how to properly use their firearms rather than just assuming proper knowledge will be passed down generationally. These classes would have the added benefit of exposing people to a network of other people. It is hell of a lot harder to get a weapon if the weapon experts think there is something majorly off about you. Plus, they'd be instilling that /proper culture/ of firearms enthusiasts who take their firearm a lot more serious than some good ol' boys. We don't even allow hospitals to take gun data, which would be extremely useful for firearm and ammo manufacturers because then they could see how effective their weapons actually were.
    2
  21.  @shadowmancy9183  take a video bro
    2
  22. Would the gun have been needed if he wasnt carrying the gun? Would it have been needed if he wasnt there at all? Any gun owner can tell you that having a loaded weapon means you intend to use it. Just as having your finger on the trigger means you intend to shoot at whatever it is your gun is currently pointing at. How can you argue defense when he knowingly put himself into that situation? When he knowingly escalated the situation? I'll state that him running away and then firing when he thought he had no other choice could be defense, but that erodes when you look at the situation from one step up and ask the question why was he there in the first place. As an added question, can he even claim defense when he was breaking the law while doing so?
    2
  23.  @GSBrofly  evidence?
    2
  24. Majority in congress and your party in presidency right? There's no limit on the amount of justices so you can just stack it. Same thing happened with Roosevelt and the new deal which saved the nation.
    2
  25. So does that mean the executive can make a 'law' (order) in which it does?
    2
  26.  @ClosestToTheSun  men can be Karen's too
    2
  27.  @wilsonchuc  Are you saying you agree with what Maduro is doing in Venezuela?
    2
  28. ​ @backloggaming3699 so they are scared because the president and his followers will be violent to them, and you are scared that your wallet will have less money in it?
    2
  29. ​ @TheSearchForTruth88 what is he being charged with?
    2
  30. He mentions that
    2
  31.  @codystone9142  then why are all the experts telling him that a rushed vaccine is not safe? Why did his experts tell him about covid and then HE LIED and said it was fine? That's not the experts, that's him.
    2
  32. ​ @neubauerjoseph it was fair as it was a jury saying that he broke the law. Can you list your 35 reasons now?
    2
  33. I wanted a detachable harpoon to reel their car into mine
    2
  34.  @Seaglopur-  our country doesnt rally around law and justice, it rallies around the idea of law and justice.
    2
  35.  @mitchellpatterson1829  I agree. The American dollar used to be backed by was it gold? Then they stopped that and now its backed by the fact that America had a massive economy and the military to tell you to trade in its currency. Where as crypto is backed by the money invested in crypto. Which is basically just a person putting their money in a pot then waiting for more people to out their money into that pot so the original person can hopefully withdraw other peoples money from the pot.
    2
  36.  @jesusjuice7401  Tyler, I think you are well opiniated and have agreed with you about a lot of things. But I think the parents have done something wrong by not dealing with their child's mental state. I also think the school is doing something wrong if kids knowingly didnt go to school that day because they were worried something was going to happen.
    2
  37.  @Staunts  what reason does the e tire intel community have for impeaching trump if they are so corrupt. What's your conspiracy theory here.
    2
  38. ​ @elig2728 buddy, he watches the shit happening for 3 hours glued to the TV saying he wanted to be with his people. His people told him there were armed people there and he told them they they weren't there for him and that they should remove metal detectors to continue to allow those people. He knew what he was doing. It's his signature that allowed that event to the capital in the first place.
    2
  39.  @dustinjames1268  the actual event of self defense isnt in question, it's what led to it that is. Question: Why was HE attacked in the first place? Question: Why did he bring a gun to the event? Question: Then why was the gun loaded? If you bring a loaded gun to an event in which you know there will be enough danger to justify bringing a loaded gun to that event, then you knowingly brought that loaded gun to a dangerous situation. To claim self defense after you knowingly put yourself into that situation is ridiculous. If I kill you if self defense, great that is self defense. But what if I also came there with the knowledge I could kill someone. This is in contrast to every day carry, which has a theory of thought called compliance. In compliance with every day carry one must carry the firearm everyday. Why? Because if a person doesnt carry the gun everyday and then the one day they carry the gun they kill someone with it, the question is why that specific day. They cant argue EDC and they just happened to have the gun on them because they dont carry it everyday. If they say they felt danger that day they've just said they've gone into that situation knowing they might shoot someone. Which means they had the chance to not shoot someone. Rittenhouse had the decision to veer off the path of killing someone plenty of times, but he steered towards it every single time. He went down the path he clearly knew could happen.
    2
  40. Take a look at Obama's pardons: https://www.justice.gov/pardon/obama-pardons Look at the dates on all of those sentences, most are between 1960 and 2002, which mean those people have been serving sentences for between 6 to 56 years, for most non violent drug charges. If you look at Trump's pardons, they are almost entirely of people who have recently committed incredible amounts of corruption. The two are not the same.
    2
  41.  @stuffbenlikes Um, Actually! Trump's campaign in 2016 WAS meeting with russian agents, as pointed out in the mueller report.
    1
  42.  @SwampyThingy  an antichrist. If such a thing were to exist.
    1
  43. He wanted to, he was going to, he was talked out of it. It would have essentially guaranteed he would be indited by the Senate.
    1
  44.  @MonkeyEngineerPHD  how many lives should we sacrifice by allowing the virus to go unchecked? How many divorces will be caused because we let It go unchecked? How many dead children will we have? It's like curing a sprained leg by amputating the leg
    1
  45. I can see them straying a bit away, but I also think they could use regular police forces for that. For instance, if someone throws a molotov cocktail at a federal building, that's like throwing a grenade at someone, so obviously a violent act. I can see the federal agents trying to find that person if they run away, but to remain peaceful they should have the regular police catch them instead.
    1
  46. Rage against the machine
    1
  47.  @discountchocolate4577  What do you have against democrats?
    1
  48.  @arconte2100  What's your point?
    1
  49. So what about 'Trial by Combat?'
    1
  50. ​ @FFVison he couldn't be president though, he was never certified in, which means he isnt president. Presidency has an actual end time where a person stops being president, it doesnt just auto renew.
    1