Comments by "AlQaisar القيصر" (@hishamalaker491) on "KaiserBauch"
channel.
-
95
-
64
-
38
-
25
-
Here is the thing from a Palestinian-Syrian Arab, I live in the middle east and I realized that the middle east is used to big or even small diverse countries like look at how diverse Syria or Iraq is or even Palestine and Egypt is also historically our civilization (Islamic golden age) and expansion of Arab identity developed as a result of diversity, you see there were many different ethnicities in the caliphate the Levant had mostly Syriacs with some Maronites and Jews, Egypt had the copts, Mesopitamia the Assyrians and other groups and Persia well the Persians and of course other groups now notice how the semitic and semitic related (copts) assimilated to the Arab culture not by force but rather by centuries long cultural domination and even then we were very diverse so was the Ottoman Empire this is the nature of our nations but not for Europe at all. Diversity for Europe (by diversity I mean permanent migrants at the scale of millions not college students or temporary expats) is a disastour maybe it works for Russia who again had always been historically diverse and whom leaders for centuries werent really Russian (The Romanovs were of German-scandinavian-anglo descent and Stalin was Georgian), on the contrary Germany is clearly only meant for the Germans maybe some Poles or native Sorbs or some neighbouring French but its Plurality German same thing everywhere else even in the UK where Scottland is Scottish, Wales is Welsh, England is English and northern irealnd well... The English did some demographic replacement different topic. You get the point some places are meant to be diverse like the: US, Canada, Mexico, Australlia, New Zealand, both Americas, Middle east, Russia, etc. While others with a history of demographic plurality like western Europe (maybe not Belgium or Spain), Somalia, Japan and Korea are not meant to be diverse as they developed with a demographic plurality.
Edit: That doesent mean us Arabs are nicer to minorities or different groups Personally I think we are a**holes to minorities compared to Westeren Europeans but again Russians had also been that I guess diverse communities just learnt to hate each other and live centuries together while homogenous nations new to the concept would have a nicer approach. Also looking at the last decades of Arab and Russian history and you would understand why we and the Russians can be mean at least compared to western Europeans.
25
-
20
-
20
-
16
-
14
-
13
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Welp as a Muslim I am not suprised, the shi'ite heretics have a heretical belief if your a christian then just imagine how you see the Mormons or something and apply it to us, Anyways the shi'ite belief was enforced on a sunni population by the Safavids at least in the context of Iran. In Contrast Syria, which has a socially liberal government, yes they are authoritarian but they are Cold war Secular nationalist, socialist-ish type has a high birth rate and a significantly more religious population and are a Sunni government. In Chechnya there was a Islamic sunni revolt against Russian control and that is after around 70 years of state atheism in the Soviet union In the late 90s. In Afghanistan not only is the government theocratic but the population is also highly religious and Afghanistan is yet again another majority sunni state.
In Egypt under nasser despite his popularity especially as a leader in the Pan-arab nationalist movement, many muslims hated his rule not only because he made rtarded decisions (like having a vietnam style war in Yemen, occupying the army there making the zionists take advantage and destroy the airforce, then the army and take the sinai) but they also hated his secularization as a result many people conspired against him, eventually when egypt actually had an election the Islamists won, again this is the context of a sunni nation.
In Palestine the resistance wasnt really Islamic, it was again under the pan-arab nationalists with really strong socialist and marxist influences which was indirectly or directly due to soviet support, today this is the opposite. Today, in Gaza and the west bank the Islamic resistance movement AKA Hamas is the most popular while Fatah the secular one is becoming less popular due to insane corruption, recent willingness for cooperation with Israelis, secularism and yeah did I mention insane corruption?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@banto1 Good we Muslims are worshipping one god with a un-corrupted holy manuscript that we wont change to become more ''Secular'' we will not be ''Secular'' we will go by what is taught according to our religion whether you like it or not. Way i say it you see Muslims as a Bad, evil, conservative and Overpopulated people you obviously hate them for not being secular GUESS WHAT WE WONT BE SECULAR! we wont follow a western invention in replacement for what god has sent down to us reason why Muslim world is a failure is because most Muslim countries were as a result of the British, French and the Dutch drawing very crap border drawing and installing Western governments in these countries i mean we are re-claiming our religion and identities after the long period of stagnation, colonization and even colonization after independence since population was western influenced and so was the government and today that the Muslims are getting their identity and religion back that you keep complaining on them having kids and not being secular like you want them to be there is a reason why people don't like the west its because they want to preserve their identities since Secularism is a artificial culture and identity since its basically anti-anything traditional and its just pro-globalization and centralization of the world basically eliminating all form of Kin ship and identity between separate ethnicities in the end Allah told us in the Quran:
''O humanity! Indeed, We created you from a male and a female, and made you into peoples and tribes so that you may ˹get to˺ know one another. Surely the most noble of you in the sight of Allah is the most righteous among you. Allah is truly All-Knowing, All-Aware.'' 49:13
so this globalization and centralization of Humanity destroying all Different identities of people and removing the nature of humans i mean in the end all different ethnicities and the people from these ethnicities are basically large tribes which slowly with generalization of people from ethnicities making them all in the same category is step 1 like with the Germans the notion of these Bavarians being different from the Saxons is disappearing as they are all generalized into one people one ethnicity (German) then next step is to generalize as accordingly to race so now apparently a white Catholic Spaniard is the exact same as a white Bosnian Muslim why? because they are all the same colour of skin then Generalization of Humanity by removing race or ethnicities so its basically the centralization of people by ethnicities then by their race then by their humanity which might sound awesome but at this point we are basically saying that everyone is the same with no distinction of culture or way of thinking in the end its okay to know each other and to marry from different ethnicities but to Generalize and Centralize all of humanity into one thing that's a bit too much. Also Generalizing by removing aspect of religion which people are also divided by also this centralization of Humanity i am talking about well it makes no sense unless these people are united under the same religion (which they can all agree on) like with Muslims this thing i am talking about its okay and natural with Muslims since Muslims are Brothers of one another now that doesn't discredit culture or credit a culture over another now it unites all of these different people in terms of ethnicity and race by something they can all agree on (belief in one god, in his prophets and holy books he sent ''Torah, Gospels, Quran, on doing good deeds, etc.) so their culture might change a bit with Islam but their ethnic identities would be in check while in the same time not hating on the other Muslim for being from a different ethnicity basically uniting different people together under one banner and purpose whilst not destroying separate ethnic identities.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@1480 There is no Brotherhood without anyKhilafah, the century long Ottoman Empire had accepted millions of Muslim refugees be it circassians who were mercilessly slaughtered and ethnically cleansed by the Russians or by Balkan Muslims experiencing the same thing by the many newly established Balkan states and even by rebellions in Ottoman controlled territory. Only a Khilafah that opposes Chinese intrest and their cleansing of our fellow muslim brother in east Turkistan or the aggressive Russian policy towards Chechnya (which had decreased in the last few decades). I recently did pilgrimage in Mecca and dear god there are so many homeless and poor South Asians living in horrible conditions the thing is that they dont belong there nor do they really want to be there same thing in Madinah but its more bearable at least and in the end god knows whats best.
Even in the Crusades during the first crusade when the crusaders where slaughtering Muslim jerusalem they seeked refuge in Damascus and were accepted there was real brotherhood for a long time and there still just not with these modern states playing this modern geopolitical game, if it was up to me I would re-instate the khilafah, industrialize it, push for more traditional and religious policies basically re-instate moral values, built a strong youth with a strong foundation, ensure security and welfare of the Muslim and Christian citizens and then finally push for remigration of middle easterners in Europe they belong in Syria, Lebanon and Iraq and not in Europe it hurts me to see my people living in foreign lands and to see Europeans mostly Germans suffer the burden of it its a lose-lose situations for middle easterners and Europeans but a win-win for the US and Israel getting the last laugh having been the cause but not accepting the responsibilities.
It is in Israel's interest to cause strife in our nations, make refugees not accept them but make Europe accept them in order to fuel anti-muslim hate which means higher acceptance of Israel and if thats not the case, well then its also to weaken Europe not the US who they can use as a WMD against their enemies just look at what happened to Syria, Iraq and Libya you cant tell me with a straight face that Israelis didnt push for or lobby for these invasions/interventions unsuprisingly Ben Shapiro is rather happy about the invasion of Iraq I mean of course, Arabs dying and becoming weaker and weaker plus more divided is his wet dream he literally says he wants to kick Palestinians out entirely and compared to soviet policy of German ethnic cleansing from eastern Europe which resulted in mass death, mass r*pe of the ethnic german population and it also resulted in Polish ethnic cleansing of some areas who were relocated to historically German land and also there was a policy where millions of Russians where moved to Königsberg after the Russians completely depopulated it and forced the millenia old German presence there which was the birth place of Preuβen and a important element of German as a whole to just perish...
Also its pretty Ironic since he (Ben) really hates the USSR and socialism.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1