Comments by "AlQaisar القيصر" (@hishamalaker491) on "Unpacked" channel.

  1. 20
  2. 12
  3. 6
  4. 5
  5. 4
  6. 4
  7. 3
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28.  @forfun9395  Uh The change from Mecca to Damscus in Syria not Iraq (in terms of the order of change) also that was a different caliphate then to Iraq that was also a different caliphate then the one in Cairo yeah again different kingdom which started in egypt 5 centuries later besides by technicality it makes sense to change the capital damscus your capital since Hejaz isnt really the best place to manage the political affairs of a nation stretching from egypt to Persia. Russians changed their capital from Moscow then to St.Petersburg then back to Moscow even thats a bad arguement since It was the Russian empire who changed it from Moscow to St.Petersburg and the commies who made the capital go back to Moscow. Also the One in Turkey was again a different kingdom by the Turks, your are literally showcasing your ignorance as Islam is a religion and these nation states with capitals they are political capitals in which they manage their nations from also why would the ottomans Change their capital from constantinople (Istanbul) to Mecca which they got after constantinople/Istanbul it strategically makes no sense and makes them far away from their European possesion. A capital is supposed to be the central strategic city in which political and military power could be prevelant. In Britian yeah its london since thats where most Of political and economic power was well why didnt it change it to one of its colonies well why would they? The conquered territories by the Muslims were homeland territories and were annexed while the British conquered territory and made them colonies. The people living in the conquered territory by the Muslims technically became citizens while people Britian conquered in their colonies were subjects to the ''mighty British Empiraaahh'' and could easily manage the country from there ( as in from London as the strategic political and technically military command). Same with France its Paris thats the chosen political command of the country. Mecca it self is actually a small city I have been on pilgrimage to it and its surrounded by mountains in the midst of the dessert why would the caliph not change it to a more convenient location where he could more easily manage the recently conquered territory in Levant, Persia and Egypt? for earlier caliphs it was but then it was changed in order to locate the central military and political center to a more centralized place. Look at the Ottoman Empire Constantinople which literally sits on Europe and Asia is a perfect geographic location for a city to manage the political and military affairs of a nation stretching from Hungary to Yemen. For the earlier caliphs in the Umayyad caliphate it was Damascus which even beforehand was as a important city located in the middle of the caliphate is technically the Centre and from there militaries can be organized. Thats the danger of ignorance friend. I know that you hate us, hate me, my people and my religion but if you educate yourself more and use more common sense maybe you would change your mind else your hatred will blind you with ignorance and you will live your whole life like this except if your a old man who already lived his whole life like this. Well God bless you my friend, may you be guided to a more righteous path.
    1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1