Youtube comments of AlQaisar القيصر (@hishamalaker491).
-
686
-
482
-
304
-
236
-
203
-
193
-
150
-
121
-
111
-
103
-
97
-
95
-
86
-
84
-
81
-
79
-
64
-
58
-
58
-
55
-
52
-
49
-
49
-
45
-
43
-
41
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
35
-
32
-
32
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
28
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
Here is the thing from a Palestinian-Syrian Arab, I live in the middle east and I realized that the middle east is used to big or even small diverse countries like look at how diverse Syria or Iraq is or even Palestine and Egypt is also historically our civilization (Islamic golden age) and expansion of Arab identity developed as a result of diversity, you see there were many different ethnicities in the caliphate the Levant had mostly Syriacs with some Maronites and Jews, Egypt had the copts, Mesopitamia the Assyrians and other groups and Persia well the Persians and of course other groups now notice how the semitic and semitic related (copts) assimilated to the Arab culture not by force but rather by centuries long cultural domination and even then we were very diverse so was the Ottoman Empire this is the nature of our nations but not for Europe at all. Diversity for Europe (by diversity I mean permanent migrants at the scale of millions not college students or temporary expats) is a disastour maybe it works for Russia who again had always been historically diverse and whom leaders for centuries werent really Russian (The Romanovs were of German-scandinavian-anglo descent and Stalin was Georgian), on the contrary Germany is clearly only meant for the Germans maybe some Poles or native Sorbs or some neighbouring French but its Plurality German same thing everywhere else even in the UK where Scottland is Scottish, Wales is Welsh, England is English and northern irealnd well... The English did some demographic replacement different topic. You get the point some places are meant to be diverse like the: US, Canada, Mexico, Australlia, New Zealand, both Americas, Middle east, Russia, etc. While others with a history of demographic plurality like western Europe (maybe not Belgium or Spain), Somalia, Japan and Korea are not meant to be diverse as they developed with a demographic plurality.
Edit: That doesent mean us Arabs are nicer to minorities or different groups Personally I think we are a**holes to minorities compared to Westeren Europeans but again Russians had also been that I guess diverse communities just learnt to hate each other and live centuries together while homogenous nations new to the concept would have a nicer approach. Also looking at the last decades of Arab and Russian history and you would understand why we and the Russians can be mean at least compared to western Europeans.
25
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
Your making stuff up besides didnt atheist commies kill much more? And fascists as well who denounce most aspects of religion? I researched about the Islamic conquests the 80m claim lacks proper evidence and is disputed and even the decrease of population by 30m claim from 1000-1500 is also disputed and there are reports that Hindu population did grow under Medieval Muslim rule as India is densely populated like China and has so many people Wars would easily destroy lands combined with droughts as well as Plagues that could contribute to death, US expansion did not lead to 20m deaths thats cap, of the 70 or 90m Natives in both Americas the amount that are in the midwest is, great plains and rocky mountains is low and 90% of all natives were killed by Plagues and those who were actually genocided had been genocided by the Spaniards in numbers lower than 10m. ''islamic terrorism'' did not cause 150,000 deaths, if your talking about ISIS then yes and most deaths were btw of Muslims, Iraq war is correct however its a capitalistic war not a religious one that was started by greedy cooperations, the Armenian genocide was led by the Ottomans true who btw were controlled by the 3 Pashas under the Young Turk rule who are nationalists btw and genocided the Armenians, Greeks and indirectly the Assyrians. Also many Arabs accepted Armenians into their lands as in rescured them hence the huge Armenian communities you see in Syria and lebanon and small ones in Palestine and Armenian-Arab relations back then and now are really good so I doubt its religious. The last one about the catholics not letting people wear condoms leading to deaths is simply not true and its BS, since the Catholic church prohibts sex before marriage and fornication and butt sex as well so technically it decreases it not increase. Congolese genocide by King Leopold II was about rubber and about consolidation and about making the most out of the congo economically, there were literally no religious incentives. The holocaust done by the nazis was in the name of racial purity not religion, the guy Hitler a ''christian'' hated his own religion and said he wish that they were conquered by the muslims a millenia ago to develop a strong warrior like aryan culture even then he wasnt a muslim or a proper christian and he had woodo superstious beliefs in racial purity which are extremly authoritarian but far from religious.
the Muslim conquests which saw less than 80m people die with many being armies dying or droughts/plagues spreading at the time of conquests which saw many people die would decrease it to 10-15m people most not in the name of religion hindu or Muslim but as a consequence of war but I will count it. Removing the 30m figure which you blame on catholics thats 30m less so far 100m less, Holocaust not being about religion but authoritarian ''secular'' ideology 6m less, Congo genocide not being about religion but trade and business 13m less, The US expansion in manifest destiny could not have killed 20m its statistically impossible so I will decrease it to 1-2m thats 18-19m less which is a exaggeration but a realistic figure, Iraq war being about consolidation and prompted by weapons arms manufacturers so its in the name of money and US consolidation of power, that removes 500k also about the trans-atlantic slave trade some religious justifications were made but it was mostly about economics, cultural and racial superiority rather than religion so I will remove that as well:
so far its 195m - (70m + 30m + 13m + 19m + 6.5m + 500k + 14m) = x
x = 37.5m
If we were to count it 15m instead of 10m, 2m instead of 1m
then its at best 44.5m deaths by ''religion'' even though this was at a course of more than 1000 years now looking at the deaths that the Nazis, Japanese, communists and secular capitalists caused its more than 100m with communism accounting for more than half. So The two conclusions are that its either secular ideologies are worse than religion or that killing is a inherent part of human nature transcending any form of belief or ideology.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I am a Palestinian, I watched netural, Conservative (zionist) news, Far-right anti semitic and anti zionist commentary, far left anti zionist commentary, leftist pro zionist commentary, anti-Islamic pro zionist commentary and more yet I am still within the same conclusion that the zionist state should be abolished and that the supposed massacre of a certain people from 1941-45 is not just highly questionable but also highly overexaggerated and highly emphasized for blatantly clear political reasons. There are people who lost their jobs and had been immensely prosecuted in the US and other places from the second part yet they still held on to their views and they dont seem to be funded by anyone as they insult those people as well as in Iran, russia, china etc as well. I listened to zionist perspective and yes even to arab and muslim zionist traitors (yes every single arab or muslim who cooeprates with zionists is a traitor) yet I am still more than ever firmly convinced in my stance against you guys.
its definetly fishy how the US threatened to sanction its old yet important allies who were with them in the fight from ww1 and 2 to the cold war just to protect a foreign jewish state that had caused them nothing but trouble since the 70s, in terms of domestic but especially international issues.
If you want to convince me otherwise then sure I am open for conversation but I am just going to say that calling me evil or a savage or something along those lines wouldnt convince me, I do not have a inferiority complex or a hatred for me and my people so that wouldnt work. Use any logical or good faith arguement or just shttalk in the comment section for all i care.
edit: I just saw another one of her videos which confirmed what I said, if you are a muslim you literally cannot ever in a million years support the zionists or their state especially since they regularly promote anti-Islamic and generally anti-Muslim content creators or they make it directly or they spread it via state propaganda, thank you for proving my point rebbeca. Any muslim who does support the zionists is objectively a cuk.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Islamically women can get a education like in Pakistan a religious country right at the border of Afghanistan women go to universities get degrees and become doctors, engineers, lawyers, etc. Also Islam doe sent permit to make your wife bruise or to make her feel pain or to show bruises on her arm as a result of beating also its against hitting in the face which it deems as bad so things like slapping are not permitted and you didnt show any source other than a subtext of some Muslim dude speaking and for my claims here are the sources:
{طَلَبُ الْعِلْمِ فَرِيضَةٌ عَلَى كُلِّ مُسْلِمٍ».
Acquisition of knowledge is binding on all Muslims (both men and women without any discrimination).
[Narrated by Ibn Maja in al-Sunan, 1:81 §224.]}
pretty much self explanatory
{“… And they (women) have rights (over their husbands…) similar (to those of their husbands) over them, but men have a degree (of responsibility) over them…” [al-Baqarah:228].}
“There is no person to whom Allah has given responsibility and dies neglecting that responsibility, but Allah will deny him Paradise.” (Muslim)}
here is the verse Allah said that Women have rights over their husbands regarding some things and Men have some rights over their Wife's regarding some things and that overall Men have a responsibility over their Women meaning they must: Feed them, Clothe them, Shelter them (basically all basic necessities) and keep them happy also they must show their love also in marriage Islamically a man must offer something to the women like say a Diamond ring or a Golden necklace or a sum of money its called (Mahr) and no the man doesn't get anything back and most importantly A man must protect his wife. Then in the hadith right below it, it says that if a Person denies the responsibility that Allah gives him like responsibility of a man over his wife then Allah will deny him paradise/heaven.
“When any one of you fights, let him avoid (striking) the face.” (Narrated by al-Bukhaari, al-Fath, 5/215).
Now this has nothing to do with woman as this hadith has to do of when to people are fighting or play fighting or wrestling or whatever to avoid hitting in the face and its not only that as its not only limited to when you fight but limited to all times, places or scenarios always avoid striking to the face.
Now see i provided Evidence and context while you provided us with some people talking and they weren't even talking it was just subtext and if anything it could've been a joke that you would obviously take as evidence and show your Muslim hating liberalized (Western so called conservatives are all liberal to me) Audience and you succeeded in achieving your agenda as most of your audience from the comment see m like they are too ignorant and would believe some biased British men without individual research (They might be American) jokes aside dont be a biased ignorant idiot and do your own research also use actualy sources and context instead of what ever they said also for the audience again dont listen to them or anyone for that matter unless he provides sufficent and authentic sources instead of some BS that you would swallow up to feed your own bias.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
9:18, not true. I have two case studies for my arguement:
1.) I live in the UAE a middle eastern Arab Muslim country that is one of the rich oil countries and I have a Jordanian Arab Christian Friend who lives here and not in Jordan not because he is prosecuted by evil A-rab Mozloms as some American would say (which wouldn't make sense because Jordan is also a Arab Muslim nation) but because Jordan is a poor country with a weak or stagnate economy while the UAE is a rich country with a lot of work opportunities and a better living standard so he went there purely for economic reasons and despite him being one of the three other Arab Christian students in a majority Arab Muslim school he is not made fun of (well he is but not for being Christian mostly for other reasons and also its only from his friends which makes sense) also I can remember that time where we were playing football and he got into beef with another Christian and started exchanging swear words while the mostly Muslim students were just watching also football as in well actual football not whatever Americans do. Also in this same country where 10% of population is Christian they are entirely working expats like before oil and massive wealth there were no Christians or Jews it was just Bedouins (pre-discover of oil). Also there are many churches here whether protestant for the huge British expat population, orthodox for the Russian and broadly eastern European population plus Arab Christians (who are mostly orthodox except Lebanese) and Catholics who are well the Lebanese and some people from the Latin Mediterranean countries and Filipinos who make up most of the Christian demographic in the UAE.
2.) my mother (A Syrian Arab Muslim) lived for most or the entirety of her childhood in Syria, Aleppo the city of her origins and there she saw many churches and regularly interacted with Christians as Syria especially especially Aleppo is famous for having many people from different origins so she lived and regularly saw many Christians including churches nothing wrong at all, Also yes in Syria Christians have been oppressed so have Sunni Muslims who make the majority of the population by a small minority group called ''Alawites'' whom the leader Bashar Al-Assad and his father Hafez al-Assad are from. In western Syria especially near the fertile and economically important Mediterranean coast Alawites had been settling in Towns and major cities changing demographic while at times forcing Christians and Sunni Muslims alike away to be displaced and mind you Sunni Muslims make up 70-75% of the Syrian population as of todays numbers while Christians make around 10%, Alawites plus other Shias around 10-15% and Druze the remaining small percentage. Therefore he could argue for overthrow of a dictatorial minority rule majority rule. Even then Christians still were able to go to church to preserve their belief system and cultural heritage and many Muslims lived with them as neighbors as Syrian Christians are largely scattered many in Aleppo others in Damascus and also many in the west near the Mediterranean coast therefore no genocide or killing or really any displacement.
Now for the actual displacement and at times massacres of middle eastern christians
How, where and when the actual of middle eastern christians happened in the last 100 years: So many Christians be it Armenians in the Caucasus, Assyrians in Northern Iraq and north eastern Syria and Even Greeks in western Anatolia were killed and largely displaced by the Ottoman Turkish empire who in the 1900s (from 1900-10 to avoid any confusion) had experienced a revolution by the young turks who are a secular Turkish nationalist party in charge while making the Pasha or I guess ''caliph?'' a puppet figurehead, in-fact it was their decision to join ww1 in the side of the axis in the first place also during these genocides they mostly took place in war with some minor ones pre-ww1 also at that same time many Arab Muslims were being mistreated as well hence the great Arab revolt that took place in late stage ww1 siding with the British in hopes of uniting the Arabs into one nation but British being British lied to them secretly met with the French (Skyes-Picot Agreement) then split the conquered Arab Ottoman territories between them and the French (Modern day Syria and Lebanon were under the French while historic Palestine, plus modern day Jordan and Iraq were under the Brits. from that time after independence most Arab countries were kingdoms then overthrewed by Enthusiastic Baath officers taking charge improving some things but overall f*cking the population up while Arab christians still had rights btw its only really post 9/11 with US war on terror including Invasion of Iraq that started this with half of Iraqi christians leaving post US invasion why? Well under Saddam sure he is a evil evil bad dictator but he gave christians rights and many actually held goverment positions as under Saddam a strong centralized goverment that practically made crime so rare with many people feeling safe from criminals just not from his regime then post ''US Liberation'' in operation ''Eye-raqi freedom'' the central goverment collapsed, criminals got out of prisons and then further into US occupation milita groups started forming as a result of the anarchy and lack of American troops stationed who didnt give a shit about crime they knocked doors at households arresting the head of the households most of the time fathers then they disbanded the entire iraqi military that was made up of 500k soldiers many of whom were sunnis (remember that for later) then secterian violence started errupting as a result then at that time there a mass migration of Iraqis mostly Muslim but many christian as well why? Because life in iraq became well... F*CKING UNBEARABLE! Then in Syria the civil war errupted with Baashar firing at peaceful protestors demanding rights and some regime change during the Arab Spring the soldiers shot them down and kept doing that until civilians formed militias and started arming themslefs then large parts of the military defected to the resistance who were for the most part winning until in the east from the Iraqi-Syrian border came a third party (ISIS). Now remember the disbanded Iraqi Military of 500k soldiers who still had their weapons well they were pissed of and were threatened by the new shia goverment in Iraq Oppresing sunnis and had wanted to restore the glory of the nation hence joining ISIS now if that reminds you of German ww1 veterans joining the Nazis in post war Germany because of how terrible the conditions were well yeah thats exactly how it played out and from there ISIS had commited some atrocities against christians and even against Muslims Shia and even Sunnis who dont agree with them or who might have accidentally did something against their belief and it was a really crazy time.
How did the situation in Palestine emerge:
Remember British promise to Arabs fighting for them against the Ottomans? Well Brits being Brits never gave them the land instead splitting between them and the French (Skyes-Picot agreement) at that same time that they promised the Jews a new homeland for them in Palestine (Balfour decleration 1917) hence starting mass migrations with jews as in percentage going from merely 3% in early1900s and late 1800s to 12.5% by 1922 then eventually they made a third of the population with even more jews as refugees post ww2 in 1947-48 same time as the Nakba essentially making the Palestinians take a demographic hit by zionists evicting hundreds of thousands from their lands while only keeping 15% of the total amount of palestinians most of whom seeked refuge either in the west Bank, Gaza, and Jordan then in '67 after the six-day war even more were refuged this time they went in massive numbers to Jordan and even to Syria and Egypt. In-fact today half of the Palestinian diaspora is in Jordan and many Palestinian worldwide expats hold Jordanian passports like literally all of my Palestinian friends hold Jordanian passports even me a Palestinian-Syrian (Palestinian father, Syrian mother) with a British Passport, I also have a Jordanian in addition to that for some reason I guess its for when we visit Jordan or something.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
In reality they are both cucks, but conservatives are not as bad. Like how liberals are beyond accepting homos or trans now they accept furries while conservatives now accept homos and trans but not furries, well give it a couple of years. Liberals are running towards a cliff, conservatives are walking towards it. Its the same thing, conservatives are just classical liberals. Their ideals about liberty, freedom and what not are classically liberal ideals since the 18th century. If you want real conservatism come to the middle east. No drinking, no homo, no seperation of church/mosque from state, fixed rate given to charity yearly, no skipping friday prayer and preferably praying in the mosque if not 5 times in the mosque at least once or twice rest in the house, religion is a way of life its not just a aesthetic cultural thing.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Flamewarden_Honoushugoshin
Fair enough, As a Arab Muslim I would be happy to see Germany as Muslim not Arab or Turkish but German Muslim where the German people actually embrace Islam or something, other than that Germany cannot be Muslim because mass migration would basically be ethnic replacement of the Germans and allah acknowledges national or tribal differences and Islamically Ethnic cleansing is not condoned. Intresting Aspect of the Shariah is that me respecting my parents, paying when I grow up the 2.5% yearly zakat mainly to charities and the needy is a must and a part of the shariah, praying, fasting, business dealings is all in the Shariah.
It is a socio-economic and even governmental system. Where we are the minority it applies to us to our daily life and doesent have to be the law of the land in-fact we are obligated to follow the law of the land so long as we have our rights not even our right of governmental representation just the right to pray, do zakat, fast, eat halal and etc.
Also where we are the majority then it should be the law of the land with christians and other groups of course following the national laws (you cant murder, you cant steal, capital punishment for some crimes especially treachery etc.) and adhering to their own religious customs while pledging loyalty to the state just as any other citizen be it Muslim or not would.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Welp as a Muslim I am not suprised, the shi'ite heretics have a heretical belief if your a christian then just imagine how you see the Mormons or something and apply it to us, Anyways the shi'ite belief was enforced on a sunni population by the Safavids at least in the context of Iran. In Contrast Syria, which has a socially liberal government, yes they are authoritarian but they are Cold war Secular nationalist, socialist-ish type has a high birth rate and a significantly more religious population and are a Sunni government. In Chechnya there was a Islamic sunni revolt against Russian control and that is after around 70 years of state atheism in the Soviet union In the late 90s. In Afghanistan not only is the government theocratic but the population is also highly religious and Afghanistan is yet again another majority sunni state.
In Egypt under nasser despite his popularity especially as a leader in the Pan-arab nationalist movement, many muslims hated his rule not only because he made rtarded decisions (like having a vietnam style war in Yemen, occupying the army there making the zionists take advantage and destroy the airforce, then the army and take the sinai) but they also hated his secularization as a result many people conspired against him, eventually when egypt actually had an election the Islamists won, again this is the context of a sunni nation.
In Palestine the resistance wasnt really Islamic, it was again under the pan-arab nationalists with really strong socialist and marxist influences which was indirectly or directly due to soviet support, today this is the opposite. Today, in Gaza and the west bank the Islamic resistance movement AKA Hamas is the most popular while Fatah the secular one is becoming less popular due to insane corruption, recent willingness for cooperation with Israelis, secularism and yeah did I mention insane corruption?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@banto1 Good we Muslims are worshipping one god with a un-corrupted holy manuscript that we wont change to become more ''Secular'' we will not be ''Secular'' we will go by what is taught according to our religion whether you like it or not. Way i say it you see Muslims as a Bad, evil, conservative and Overpopulated people you obviously hate them for not being secular GUESS WHAT WE WONT BE SECULAR! we wont follow a western invention in replacement for what god has sent down to us reason why Muslim world is a failure is because most Muslim countries were as a result of the British, French and the Dutch drawing very crap border drawing and installing Western governments in these countries i mean we are re-claiming our religion and identities after the long period of stagnation, colonization and even colonization after independence since population was western influenced and so was the government and today that the Muslims are getting their identity and religion back that you keep complaining on them having kids and not being secular like you want them to be there is a reason why people don't like the west its because they want to preserve their identities since Secularism is a artificial culture and identity since its basically anti-anything traditional and its just pro-globalization and centralization of the world basically eliminating all form of Kin ship and identity between separate ethnicities in the end Allah told us in the Quran:
''O humanity! Indeed, We created you from a male and a female, and made you into peoples and tribes so that you may ˹get to˺ know one another. Surely the most noble of you in the sight of Allah is the most righteous among you. Allah is truly All-Knowing, All-Aware.'' 49:13
so this globalization and centralization of Humanity destroying all Different identities of people and removing the nature of humans i mean in the end all different ethnicities and the people from these ethnicities are basically large tribes which slowly with generalization of people from ethnicities making them all in the same category is step 1 like with the Germans the notion of these Bavarians being different from the Saxons is disappearing as they are all generalized into one people one ethnicity (German) then next step is to generalize as accordingly to race so now apparently a white Catholic Spaniard is the exact same as a white Bosnian Muslim why? because they are all the same colour of skin then Generalization of Humanity by removing race or ethnicities so its basically the centralization of people by ethnicities then by their race then by their humanity which might sound awesome but at this point we are basically saying that everyone is the same with no distinction of culture or way of thinking in the end its okay to know each other and to marry from different ethnicities but to Generalize and Centralize all of humanity into one thing that's a bit too much. Also Generalizing by removing aspect of religion which people are also divided by also this centralization of Humanity i am talking about well it makes no sense unless these people are united under the same religion (which they can all agree on) like with Muslims this thing i am talking about its okay and natural with Muslims since Muslims are Brothers of one another now that doesn't discredit culture or credit a culture over another now it unites all of these different people in terms of ethnicity and race by something they can all agree on (belief in one god, in his prophets and holy books he sent ''Torah, Gospels, Quran, on doing good deeds, etc.) so their culture might change a bit with Islam but their ethnic identities would be in check while in the same time not hating on the other Muslim for being from a different ethnicity basically uniting different people together under one banner and purpose whilst not destroying separate ethnic identities.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@1480 There is no Brotherhood without anyKhilafah, the century long Ottoman Empire had accepted millions of Muslim refugees be it circassians who were mercilessly slaughtered and ethnically cleansed by the Russians or by Balkan Muslims experiencing the same thing by the many newly established Balkan states and even by rebellions in Ottoman controlled territory. Only a Khilafah that opposes Chinese intrest and their cleansing of our fellow muslim brother in east Turkistan or the aggressive Russian policy towards Chechnya (which had decreased in the last few decades). I recently did pilgrimage in Mecca and dear god there are so many homeless and poor South Asians living in horrible conditions the thing is that they dont belong there nor do they really want to be there same thing in Madinah but its more bearable at least and in the end god knows whats best.
Even in the Crusades during the first crusade when the crusaders where slaughtering Muslim jerusalem they seeked refuge in Damascus and were accepted there was real brotherhood for a long time and there still just not with these modern states playing this modern geopolitical game, if it was up to me I would re-instate the khilafah, industrialize it, push for more traditional and religious policies basically re-instate moral values, built a strong youth with a strong foundation, ensure security and welfare of the Muslim and Christian citizens and then finally push for remigration of middle easterners in Europe they belong in Syria, Lebanon and Iraq and not in Europe it hurts me to see my people living in foreign lands and to see Europeans mostly Germans suffer the burden of it its a lose-lose situations for middle easterners and Europeans but a win-win for the US and Israel getting the last laugh having been the cause but not accepting the responsibilities.
It is in Israel's interest to cause strife in our nations, make refugees not accept them but make Europe accept them in order to fuel anti-muslim hate which means higher acceptance of Israel and if thats not the case, well then its also to weaken Europe not the US who they can use as a WMD against their enemies just look at what happened to Syria, Iraq and Libya you cant tell me with a straight face that Israelis didnt push for or lobby for these invasions/interventions unsuprisingly Ben Shapiro is rather happy about the invasion of Iraq I mean of course, Arabs dying and becoming weaker and weaker plus more divided is his wet dream he literally says he wants to kick Palestinians out entirely and compared to soviet policy of German ethnic cleansing from eastern Europe which resulted in mass death, mass r*pe of the ethnic german population and it also resulted in Polish ethnic cleansing of some areas who were relocated to historically German land and also there was a policy where millions of Russians where moved to Königsberg after the Russians completely depopulated it and forced the millenia old German presence there which was the birth place of Preuβen and a important element of German as a whole to just perish...
Also its pretty Ironic since he (Ben) really hates the USSR and socialism.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cjshow-zp6nh Well As a Muslim idk wtf Shariah beliefs are, I am a muslim with Islamic beliefs. Shariah means law, me respecting my parents is adhering to the Shariah, me avoiding Pork like the Jews do is adhering to the Shariah, Me praying is adhering to the Shariah so go cry about it. Also Very tolerant guy right here, sympathises for Asians and Jews but throws muslims under the bus yeah ''these evil people''. Also the Europeans have nothing to make people assimilate to, at this point they are abandoning their own culture which is sad also this culture they want us to assimilate to, its just blatant liberalism and secularism with a mix of American culture. While Muslims in the US had campaigned to outlaw any flag other than the US being flown in the public in Hamtrack, the Europeans are banning the Hijab, Nikab, The Christian cross and more in public areas (yeah even christians are being affected by Frances secularism since the late 1700s mind you). Mind you 10-15% of the French military is Muslim and millions of Muslims fought for the British empire in the ww2 not that I am proud of that or anything. Only the west benefited from this anyways, the nazis are your enemies not ours regardless of them being good or evil just like how Israel is our enemy and not yours.
Also you supporting lgbt proves that conservatism now is just conserving Israel and the GDP, wtf are you conserving if the things you conserve are becoming lighter each year, your a hypocrite. 50 years ago, Conservatives were conserving the status of relationships, the culture, religion and were homophbic (just like me) now they are integrating some of them. At this point the America first movement though i disagree with them can see them as the real conservatives. You are not conserving shi, you are just classical liberal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ah so Bosniaks, Chechens, Dagestanis, Kazakhs, Turks, Albanians, Kosovars, Arabs, Pakistanis, Indians, Uiyghurs, Indonesians, Nigerians and Bengalis are bad people? All of these people who have different cultures and different looks from different continents are bad by default of them being Muslim?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
there are three kinds of commentators here:
-Neo-Conservative cuck that loves Ben shapiro, says the left stole his free speech but supports this, is America first but still wants to give billions to Israel and still wants to go to war and expects Europe to clean it up like they did before. Kind of religious and is either protestant or catholic
-Conservative that isnt a cuck, actually cares about his country, actually stands for America first, knows who the real enemy is, actually supports free speech, doesent want his country to go to war pointlessly kill people and have many of his own killed and is against the establishment sort of. Actually christian and religious likely catholic but maybe protestant.
-Fascist neo-nazi that isnt a cuck, hates jws, doesent want migrants, wants to stop supporting Israel, wants ethnostate, Despises the establishment and really loves Austrian painter. Either really religious and hates every other race or sees christianity and abrahamic religiouns as a product of the Jews and wants paganism not because of belief but because of his ancestral culture you know just like hitler with the aryan spirit or smthing idk.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Lets say you expelled all Muslims regardless of Race and whatnot in Britian, lets say even Native English/scottish/Welsh/Irish or other European Muslims, you would still have many Blacks, Indians and others in britian which would also cause the far-right to rise. In the US its about Catholic Latinos not Muslims, these Latinos happen to not be white European (not all of them just a good enough proportion of those who immigrate or cross the border illegaly) which is more acceptable in the multi-ethnic US which was like this since its inception, Scotts, irish, Germans, Dutch, French, Italians, English, Black, etc. However in Europe where most countries are literally named after their ethnic group, even if you expell all the ''evil'' Muslims whether they are native German or not you will still have millions upon millions of Africans, Slavs, Asians, etc in Germany which would cause societal instability and havoc. If the Austrian painter himself said that Germans could have been Muslim instead of christian this means the problem here is not religion. For what we know Germany could be 99% German but entirely: Orthodox christian/Muslim/Shia/Jewish (some Arabs in Yemen converted to Judaism back in the 4th century so hypothetically it could work), or just atheist/agnostic. Islam just like christianity spans pretty much every race and most ethnicities in the world. Bosniak nationalism was mostly inspired by Islam hence why you got Arabs doing Jihad during the siege of Sarajevo and in other places likewise for the Serbs who utilized Orthodox christianity and in ww2 the croatians used their catholicism to distinguish themselfs and considered Bosniaks as muslim croations. All them 3 mfers are the same, its just different religions.
Its not about Islam, its about the ''other'' race/people. Its not really racism in countries defined by their pluralistic ethnicities, in Places like Russia they always had a million ethnicities in-fact the Russian empire or Russia at its maximum extent was barely 50% Russian and that was in the early 1900s/late 1800s, in the New world it was diverse since inception the exception here become the pluralistic western and Northern European societies. If the Northern Irish catholics are still beefing with the protestant English why would they accept a Muslim lets say a Bosniak white Muslim for a optimistic scenario, or a Hindu or a Chinese or even a Black catholic? If they feel threatened by those closest to them, how would they feel about complete foreigners? Mind you the Northern irish catholic and the English protestant likely have a common ancestor not that far away. At this point I wouldnt be suprised if a English protestant and irish catholic in Northern Ireland are more related to each other than their fellow brothers in England or Ireland.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Dang, imagine the sht that the ✡did in Germany to anger the germans this much, then when you look at Palestine you would understand why Palestinians are the most anti-semantic, you think the sht they do in the west is bad? Imagine if they kick you out of your land, kill your people, expell you, humuliate you then gaslight the world especially the western public through decades of educational induced indoctrination into making themselfs the victims, THE ETERNAL VICTIMS! ITS THE ARABS, THE GERMANS, RUSSIANS, CHINESE, WHITE PEOPLE, CHRISTIANS, JAPANESE, ITS THE ENTIRETY OF HUMANITY BEFORE IT WILL EVER BE THE ✡. REMEMBER THE HOLOCAUST AND ONLY THE HOLOCAUST! THE ONLY UNIQUE ''real'' GENOCIDE! IGNORE WHAT HAPPENS TO THE GOYIM IN UKRAINE, VIETNAM, GERMANY (ethnic cleansing of Germans from The region of prussia and the mass r*pe of German women under allied soldiers), BOSNIA, CHINA AND EAST ASIA (during ww2) AND MORE! ONLY THIS SPECIAL SET OF PEOPLE SUFFERED THIS MUCH ACROSS DIFFERENT NATIONS AND PLACES THE EVENTS OF WHICH DIFFER ACROSS CENTURIES! THIS EVIL EVIL UNLOYAL GOYIM!
when you look at Karl Marx, Trotsky, Bukharian, Alvin Goldstein, Magnush Hirschfield, Weinstein, Epstein, Influences in the west be it in Weimar or the British parliament or the US congress or the Banks, The media, the ones who pushed for ''the war on terror'' and more then you would see a pattern. Pattern recognition is a basic primal survivalistic human instinct and when we apply it we get called anti-semantic or National-socialist (youtube likes to ban sht left and right so I am careful with how I phrase things).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Wow you sound like a hippie also how do you know all religions are like this, even though i am Muslim and i am a 100% confident and sure that the Quran doesn't command me to kill any non-Muslims unless it was self defense or if i was in a War against them or even against another Muslim if he attacks me wanting to kill me in a war or in any normal circumstance then i must kill him to either protect my self or if i was at war then its my duty to kill the enemy Muslim or not, unless they surrender and btw in Islam i cannot kill civilians or cut a tree when i fight the enemy let alone again kill any civilians unjustifiably also the Quran says there is no Compulsion in religion and the verse that talks about killing the Pagan enemies that was directly sent to when the Prophet (Pbuh) was fighting with his men against the incoming pagans and it says in the next verse that we can live with them as long as they don't kick us out of our homes and they don't break the treaties that we sign with them and even though i am not Christian i feel like there is something similar with Christianity in the end we also believe in Jesus in-fact you cant be a Muslim without Believing that Jesus Christ is the Messenger of god and if you don't believe that all the other messengers of god but not (god) himself that also applies to (Abraham, Ishmael, Isaq, Joseph, Jacob, Aaron, John, ezekiel and more) and the Quran says that Jews and Christians are the people of the book the people who had received a holy book from god so yes we do believe in the Gospels and Torah that was revealed back then since by now the word of god has not been entirely but mostly corrupted in the Torah and the Gospels and we believe that the Quran is the final Truthful revelation now i don't want to debate anyone about theology i really don't i just wanted to share my belief and my opinion so if you have a opposing belief i would appreciate it if you tell me about it but don't Insult me or someone else or my belief or someone else belief, i just like anyone else want to be respectful thought that seems impossible in the internet.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Quackzine Yeah yeah sure bud, i have seen this arguement many times actually. I am trying to create friendship and you attack me? Expected you American conservatives or even Europeans for that matter hate us so fucking much that even when we try to be friends with you or try to reach a agreement you still attack us. Thank you i am now convinced that Westerners are bad whether European or American or whatever whether conservative, liberal, Communist or even fascists from now on i only see Eastern Europeans as good while Westerners can f*ck of now there are some exceptions like the Irish or Germans or American Southerners/midwesterners but f*ck the rest and btw its all your fault. Its like you have a problem that we have a solution for but your hatred for us is so much that you refuse to cooperate how sad also to refute your argument i am going to do it step by step using 2 factors:
Factor 1: Conditions before vs now and how to compare and reach a analysis/judgment:
You have to understand that judging something like marriage or consumation by the standards of the last 30-40 years is retarded and i can see that this is what your doing so congrats on being a retard! in the last 30-40 years traditions or things that were normal became immoral or too difficult or too bad thus you cannot judge or analyze the past especially not morally by the present because the past makes the present but the present doesent make the past in simple words comparing the past to now makes sense because one already happened and the other is currently happening and what already happened had resulted in whats happening today but when you compare whats happening right now to what happened before and you judge the past based on that is stupid because of course today literacy rates are higher, education is higher, technology changed our lifes and we became extremly urbanized much more than the past all of this didnt lead to the past but the past lead to that so you should compare whats happening today or why by looking into the past not vice versa.
Factor 2: Conditions Primarily in the past + the matter of consummation by puberty and the moral background behind it:
Back then literacy rates especially in a barren dessert with minimal civilizational contact, with very high mortality rates and with people maturing at a young age it made sense to marry young like once one hits puberty because biologically that's when the man/women is capable of having kids and even then the mentality and thought process changes slowly but surely maturing the person and Islamically both male and female must be Physically, physchologically and maturely (dont know if that's word) ready to marry and consummate. Now the prophet (pbuh) married her Aisha at 6 but he never touched or had intimate relations until 9, now of course biologically its very possible and not very rare especially not back then to get to puberty by the age of 9 and also back then Arabs and many other people even civilizations would make marriage contracts at an early age in order to affirm that they are married but then live separately and not talk to each other much or at all until one or even both hit puberty where they would then have intimate relations and live with each other and raise a family (possibly) which given the circumstances and given the fact that the prophet (pbuh) waited three years and we all know that p*dophiles, Predators and r*pists are not patient at all they would go the moment they can. Also that's THE DAUGHTER OF ABU BARK AL-SADIQ! HIS BEST FRIEND AND THE FIRST TO BELIEVE IN HIS PROPHETHOOD! THE FACT THAT HE WOULD DO SUCH A THING I MEAN, THE PROPHET (pbuh) WAS KNOWN FOR HIS MORALS, NICE ATTITUDE AND WAS KNOWN TO HAVE SHAME MAKING IT FURTHER UNLIKELY! Also he was never the one to suggest the Marriage in the first place it was someone else called ''Khawlah Bint Hakeem'' and the marriage was through her also the marriage had a reason well two actually the first one is that Allah (swt) told the prophet (pbuh) to marry her and the second reason was to strengthen relationships and bonds with his best friend Abu-bakr also again suggested by the fact that he waited THREE YEARS to consumate and the fact that he had previously married a women almost 15 years older than him for a very long time that he loved very much and that he cried for a lot when she died that's of course ''Khadija'' so i doubt that a p*dophile would have been previously interested in older women also many of the prophets (pbuh) other wife's were all much older than Aisha so again that disproves that he was a p*do because they dont have any patience when they would want to commit the act especially not for 3 BLODDY YEARS! And also they wouldn't have been interested in any older women maybe (probably not) before but definitely not after disproving your argument.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
As another Arab I say the problem is artifical states with artifical borders drawn out post skyes-picot agreement by Britian and France. 100 years ago there was no Syria or Palestine or Iraq or Lebanon as identities but as French or British dominions as before that say 120 years ago during the Ottomans all of these people were just Arabs from different regions like instead of Syria or Palestine there was just the Levant yet still people in the Levant, Iraq and even Hejaz (western Arabia) still saw eachother as Arabs and didnt mind the geogrpahical boundaries they used to migrate move around and even settle in different cities as they were all in each others as the same but today we have artifical nationalism for artifical states with artifical borders and these artifical states are: Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Palestine and well the rest of the arab world maybe Saudi is an exception also I am saying this as a Palestinian-Syrian myself but I perfer to be called Levantine Arab because lets be honest Palestine and Syria were never countries as these territories are majority Arab and Muslim and should be like that with one state ruling over them so I am against Israel and I wish the destruction of them and their people but when they say that Palestine was never a country they are right its only a identity a falsified one since they are just Arabs (majority muslim and minority christian) just like Syrians and Iraqis. We should all be in one country like before no not like the Ottomans but say maybe like the first three caliphates: الخلافة الراشدة و الخلافة الأموية و الخلافة العباسية
or in english if you didnt understand that: The Rashidun caliphate, the Umayyad Caliphate and the Abbasid Caliphate.
We should be united in one nation under Allah outside of foreign influences like: The Turks, Persians, westerners and Jews. Now if the Turks were to form a caliphate again and be like the ottomans then maybe joining them would be a good idea but until then we should do that it really is the only solution. We never prospered when we adopted western ideologies like nationalism, socialism, nationalism + socialism or even democracy or republicanism the caliphate a proper centralized one that looks after its citizens and treats the minority christians properly with rights and a say in accordance to the Shariah.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Hanchanad14 Not really, there were banks in palestine under Ottoman control even in Gaza and many urban centres were bussling and it became even better under the Brits with proper infrastructure, trains, even commercial fruit companies and its own currency. Also Honor killings are extremly rare, you just mention it to make others look bad. just like I were to say that the US is a r*pist country because of the high amount of s*xual assaults there, its not logical. also many of the governments in the Arab world be them for or against America are there by design as in the US does this on purpose in order to keep seek maximum exploitation and to prevent any kind of ''threat'' from emerging there a threat which they feared after the severe activities that they did. the PA is a zionist puppet, its not even a real government and in Gaza its a besieged city, no amount of human perfection would make it better.
I*rael is lucky to be favoured and subsidized immensely by the US, it just so happens that anti American countries in the middle east are less developed than pro American countries and that is by design, its not because anti-Americanism makes you stupid but its because for the US to secure their dominance they would rely on Maximum chaos in the middle east.
Libya was a great place under gaddafi now its a hellhole with open air slave areas, why? Because the US overthrowed gaddafi when he tried selling Oil with a different currency just like with saddam, there was housing, education, rights for all (Not freedom of speech but of religion I guess), food, safety but again the US invaded them to secure their dominance. As for Syria its a Russo-Iranian puppet, Lebanon is a ethnic mess created by design by the French. Jordan is in the worst geographic area with no resources or coast and is mostly dessert built mainly from scratch.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Oh my god, as a Muslim I am so deeply affected by his meaningless T-Shirt. I am sure that Muslims certainly wear t-shirts that say ''Checkmate crusaders''. Part of me think that David wood isnt actually obsessed with us, he just does it for a career since by looking at his comment section you would think Hitler is an angel. You guys are not even helping Muslims ''escape evil Islam'' at this point, your just hating on all Muslims. Palestinians yeah screw them, right? I mean I saw ex-muslim channel that are at least decent enought to not justify hatred on us or Palestinians, they outright criticized david wood and AP for inciting hatred instead of dialogue or peaceful discussion to ''sway Muslims out of Islam'' or whatever tf you guys want to do. If you want to make us worship your triune god maybe dont be rude, maybe improving your manners will help.
David is indeed a pshychopath, he went from wearing female clothes to wearing a T-Shirt mocking Muslims with Quranic verses on them, like did you convert and we missed it. Idk. The fact this channel is promoting this bullcrap says so much about you. Your not preaching anything your just showing yourself to be pathetic. ''oH loOk gUyS i HaVe a t-ShiRt mOcKinG mUsliMs, i aM sO cOoL!!!!''
If you mock my religion, prophet and belief I am just going to hate you and regress even more, I only saw this one christian missionary a American who is respectful and very kind and engages in meaningful dialogue and doesent eat quranic verses because well he is sane enough not to. I forget his name but he is a great man, I dont respect a guy who just mocks and keeps throwing insults left and right like its proves his point.
P.S: This comment is gonna get deleted because this missionary channel is mad that someone is calling them for what they arent. A Missionary channel, your not even spreading christianity or preaching it. Your just hating on Islam and nothing else not Hinduism (which is worse because they are non-Abrahamic and pray to idols) or Jews (who deny jesus, insult him and had according to you ''killed him'') its just Muslims. its as if we live rent-free in your heads. You know I dont spent my day on crap like this, I hang out with my friends or swim or just chill instead of being pathetic like this guy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Lol blaming Sharia law again damn you don't even know what it is who am i kidding average f**king American so Sharia is Islamic law it tells Muslims how to fast, how to pray, how to and when to and how much to give in Charity, how to initiate a marriage and a divorce according to Islamic law, how to split inheritance, how to conduct Banking operations since interest is Haram and more stuff seriously i couldn't expect more from a American your a Tate fan well guess what Tate is Muslim he reads the Quran he prays according to the Quran and Hadith and which the Shariah tells us how to do it also the fact that you called it ''Shariah law'' shows how dumb you are its called Shariah not ''sHariAh lAw'' i live in a Shariah country my mom went to college, worked, married, stopped working willingly because she wanted to take care of me and my sisters, also my Arab Christian friends are treated very well they are tolerated, the Christian population almost makes 9% and is entirely by migrants and there are multiple cathedrals, Churches for Orthodox, Catholics and Protestant also my Arab Christian friend is treated very well by the Majority Arab Muslim class including me in-fact they also think secularism and LGBT are dumb what a surprise we Arabs can get along pretty well when Dumb westerners like you want to tell us what to do and what should we do since you are our grand masters yeah so f**k off please. Also first continuous University opened by a Muslim woman under Shariah in mid 9th century and developments in math, science and astrology all under scientists who come from all over the world to Baghdad to the house of wisdom to the capital of the Islamic caliphate which applies the Shariah that was the Islamic golden age also first word that Angel Gabriel revealed to Prophet Mohammed (pbuh) was read to a illiterate Mohammed (pbuh) first word in the Quran first word in the revelation is read in a time where Arabs were mostly illiterate Nomads a change has come. Also there is a reason why around 2/3rds of all known stars have Arabic names or Arabic derived or inspired names that says a lot by it self also developments on the eye and the study on the reflection of light from the eye by ''Muslims Applying Shariah'' was a factor in the Development of the Camera centuries later as Europeans would use Scientific books and would use Architecture developed by Muslims to develop themselves in-fact Muslim controlled Spain for a Few centuries was the Most developed place in all of Europe all whilst applying the Shariah so i don't care what some Pashtuns scattered in Mountains do i care about what the Shariah, Quran, Hadith and Sunnah say good day and educate yourself also don't be a ignorant fool.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Your wrong, the difference being that Arabs had always been in the levant and Iraq, there were many Bedouins including the prophet pbuh himself who was merchant at a young age and would go to the levant with his uncle for business and there were actually many arab kingdoms throught the Levant and some that occupied the negev and Sinai area same with iraq there was a arab kingdom in northern mesopitamia and the city of Palmyra in Syria had always been majority Arab but other than that the people didnt change, under the caliphate christians were majority for centuries while with European colonization 90% died of disease and the rest being alien to the spanish were subject to brutal conquest but to the arabs the people they conquered they had been interacting and trading with them for thousands of years we are all part of the same racial group, we are semites you know. Also the people never changed like I am Palestinian-Syrian, from my Palestinian side I have some Samaritan blood as my family comes from Nablus a prominent Samaritan town/city and from my syrian side well gods knows what its very mixed genetically but culturally/linguistically its arab.
The Suspicioun of Jews in the arab world was somewhat justified, you had Jewish holocaust refugees arriving in boats written in them that they lost their homes and dreams so lets not destroy that for them but then a few years later they fought a war and pushed back the people that were already living there that being Arab Muslims and Christians. Beforehand with the insanely high numbers of Jews migrating to the mandade of Palestine many were buying up massive plots of lands and were establishing socio-economic dominance and were at times expelling arab farmers from there, the infrastructure they built due to experiences in a developed Europe compared to the Arabs living in the last days of the Ottomans one filled with corruption and discrimination. Anyways it is due to these action plus a plan by Israeli zionists themselfs to get settlers and what better place to get settlers than from the massive Jewish population of the Mid-east, there is a reason why many Palestinians in the west bank feel safer when they see white soldiers its because those are ashkenazi while those who are Mizrahi soldiers might be more violent to them which makes sense in a way. There was also the zionist plot in Egypt to create tension and diplomatic crisis via political assasinations causing problems with them and the US I think it was called ''The Lavon Affair'' where Israel would initiate bombings and attacks on westerners in Egypt and from it as a action of Egyptians therefore soaring relations with the west, thats one example of why Jews were seen in a negative light.
In North America the colonists all trace their genes back to Europe while in Syria, Palestine and Iraq when the arabs take these dna tests they would see that they are from these areas and not the peninsuila thats because unlike N.A there was the process of assimilation, while in N.Athe natives were kicked out or likely died from disease while the conquered people under the Arabs were the intellectual class and provided alot of intellect and helped spur the the Islamic golden age since the Arab muslims even the prophet pbuh were all illiterate however Islamic emphasis on Knowledge made the arabs basically learn from there civilized conquered subjects just like the mongols though mongols were much more violent, scholars were spared and brought to Gengis khan as they had immense importance according to them at least. These semitic people in the levant and Mesopitamia having lost their identity or having weak idenitites due to centuries of Persian and Roman rule, being ruled by another semitic people with a close language and culture they opted for that as Arab culture became dominant and arabic language became the ligua Franka even among non-arab Muslim subjects.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Brother your a Muslim and Arab just like me, you should know out of all people that Communism, socialism, Liberalism, Secularism and fascism and all other western ideologies cannot help us Its these western ideologies that ruined the Arab and Islamic nations today most Arab countries are poor and well apparently secular same with Islamic nations the only time where Arabs and Muslims prospered was in the Islamic golden age where the Shariah was made and applied, where many modern inventions have their origins from discoveries made in the Islamic golden age where the European renaissance got its inspiration from that's right the Renaissance started after the Crusaders who sacked and Killed all Muslims and Jews in Palestine they found the beauty in the cities and a lot of science as well as innovations, which they took back home and that inspired Italian Merchants to innovate and btw the Renaissance is considered to be the start of western civilization also Algebra was made by a Muslim and 2/3rd's of stars have Arabic names for a reason and a lot of Medical equipment some of whom are still used today were first made by Muslims also the Golden age of the Jewry (Judaism) is Occurred in Muslim Spain yes in (Al-Andalus) so in Europe where most Jews were prosecuted and hated by Christians and the catholic church the Muslims were giving them the chance and space to innovate and contribute i wish we can be united again instead of being western puppets and instead of falling to their ideologies that they made, mate trust me i used to be a hardcore socialist but then i eventually realized that Socialism Leads to Famines, genocides and its distances people from god and in examples like the USSR Christians and Muslims alike were equally oppressed by the USSR since it was literally not a secular country but a atheist one like they forced atheism also Capitalism is also bad since it leads to greed, Infidelity, Usury (interest) which is prohibited in Islam, Exploitation of Workers and paying them late as well as paying them less which is also a sin in Islam as well as the Destruction of this Beautiful earth that Allah gave us that's why the Economic system of Islam is the perfect solution where there is private property but no exploitation, there is trade but no sinful stuff, where we are allowed to use the earth and its resources but we should not get to a point where we are getting more than we're giving it and also where Animals are killed in a Islamic ( halal) way in which the Animal is killed really fast so that it doesn't suffer and before the Animal is killed he is in full submission especially after the Butcher says a Islamic saying and the Animal should not suffer if it suffers and if the name of Allah (god) is not recited then the meat is not halal according to Islamic standards also about Animals yeah we are allowed to eat them however only some of them and we must treat them good hurting a animal is a sin also Alcohol and Pork are strictly prohibited which is why the middle east has lower cancer rates than the west i mean scientifically speaking Pork comes from a very dirty animal and its one of the most unhealthy meats it contains too many calories and it might contain diseases especially since Pigs like to be in Mud and the are mostly in farms where they could attract many germs also about Alcohol well no need to say since its obvious look at drunk driving look at people who would rape while intoxicated would beat their children and wife, who would have organ failure also anything that causes Intoxication is Haram (prohibited) which includes drugs unless medical drugs (that's okay) also even if its just wine or a small bottle of beer or even a tiny bit of drinking beer is Sinful but if you do anything Haram without knowing or by mistake which happened to me i accidently ate pork in a buffet in Greece and it tasted good but i was disgusted afterwards and my stomach was Hurting me then i will not be judged nor would i get sins since in the end Allah said in the Quran that he wont make humans or a person do beyond what they are capable of nor would he be harsh if they do things by mistake and also if it was intentional then seeking forgiveness and repenting is the solution since god would replace your sins' with good deeds.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
i just want to to say that i am not a communist but what i read and understood from communism is that its the eventual Dissolution of the state, where society becomes classless, moneyless and stateless as marx said though he didnt say that its automatically going to happen he said that there must be a communist goverment that would work towards having a classless, moneyless and stateless society now i repeat i am not a communist i am just saying what is communism if people were actually working towards it so all the former ''communist states'' were actually pretty much authoritarian socialist states that gave no rights to everyone and who used their position to pretty much manipulate the people. its because in countries that became a authoritarian socialist state they became like that because they had public support because the people were oppressed by the elite or monarchy that ruled them like in tsarist Russia where the empire was basically a 14th century feudal kingdom i mean the rest of europe were modernizing, industrializing and giving rights while Russia did the opposite thats why eventually people vouched for communism even after the monarch the last one (Tsar nicholas II) adbicated which was during ww1 there a was a semi-democracy temporary Goverment called the ''Duma'' who took control of the nation and decided to continue war with the Germans and the people got more pissed so the bolsheviks revolted on october 1917 and they gave eastern europe to the German empire who then lost it a year later because of course the ''Freedom fighters'' you know the US had to join the entente (France and britian also russia but russia is dead so its pretty much france and britian) anyways so the US came and saved them its because the German empire was so close to destroying their defences and take paris but the US intervened with around 200,000 fresh troops every month. then it was pretty much a civil war in Russia as a resistance against the Bolsheviks called the ''White army'' yeah it sounds pretty racist to any woke AF American lol, anyways as a i was saying yeah civil war and then the ''red army'' was victorious. Then lenin was the head of state and sure people were dying in the streets because of a famine that was caused because of the civil war so even if the white army won the same famine wouldve still occured yeah and after lenin people though that Trotsky would take over and spoiler alert he didnt instead the power hungry stalin took over who well was not good.
So yeah the very unnecessary history lesson is over and in conclusion i want to say that communism was never actually implemented because its too imposibble to actually make it that is unless we live in a utopian advanced space society then it would probably work but because we dont then any attempt at communism like pure radical communism or radical socialism would result in you know, the following: Death, Genocide, dictatorship, corruption/abuse of power and well famine.
This is why i am more in favour of european style social-democracy not Democratic socialism no thats a whole different thing Social democracy is basically capitalism with alot of taxes and a welfare state that provides everything for every citizen in need because anything radical in the left or in the right results in DEATH, DEATH,DEATH and DEATH! dont forget oppresion from the state.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Welp as a Palestinian, I would be lying if I said it isnt happening. I saw the demographic statistics of Palestine and it shows why my people got angry at the higher proportionality of Jews and how it helped them in '48 and how they are now gaslighting the world into thinking its their land after they expelled us from what is now called ''Israel'', it was never that at least not for 2 thousand years even then it was a small prportion of the land. Anyways, the Land belongs to us not just west bank and Gaza all of it, these people are parasites and they dont belong here. They are merely a colonial product But I dont blame Britian, I wouldve also got rid of my juice in a humane way if possible. As a palestinian Well I cant deny it anymore out of principle, it is and has been happening and I feel bad for primarly Germany. I wouldnt mind a Islamic germany except that it needs to have native Germans who are Muslims not arabs or Turks or even Slavs. The Germans lost millions of acres of land in Prussia and not even the remainders as in east of Poland is safe anymore.
Even as a Muslim I recognize the importance of identity, Islam comes first but our national/ethnic identities are still relevant regardless of how we say it. Ethnicity is not neccesarly race or blood but mostly culture and language. The Native French are a combination of Celtic, Latin and Germanic elements from its past which make the French person not his blood but culture, language and heritage.
We are fighting a war of extinction, a clash of civilization with the Jews in Palestine though fortunately as we shrink we grow more aware, more connected and we care more even among the diaspora.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1:43 Bullsht, what 1000 years of colonialsm and mass slaughter and what no? First of all it wasnt continious there were centuries of peace and second of all during the initial conquests as in first 4 centuries there were hardly any massacres or genocides, then in the 13th century the mongols genocided millions of muslims in Iran, central Asia, Iraq and Syria. They wipedout Baghdad, the center of intellect around the world at the time.
then Timurlane a ''Fellow muslim'' went on a rampage of conquests killing many more muslms than non-muslims then came the Ottomans where the battles in the balkans say killing, pillaging and slaughtering on both sides then The Russians ethnically cleansed much of the steppe, genocided the Tatar Muslims in Crimea. Circassians in the Caucasus and the Chechens like 3 times first time under the Russian empire, then under Stalin (USSR) extension of Russia during the ww2 deportations then under modern Russia as in Putin in the 2000s.
Damn do I hate idiots. Its just so easy to fking scapegoat us isnt it? No wonder, every Goyim that opposed the non-Goyim became the worlds enemy, From Moustache man to us Muslims and Arabs as well as white people.
your information is so blatantly wrong and misleading its insane. The Bolshevik revolution which had major non goyim leadership during and after the Russian civil war as in USSR killed 5m Ukrainians and 15m Russians and millions of muslims through their communist 5 year plans, Gulags, government mismanagement of distribution of food and dont forget the 27m dead soviets due to their incompetency in ww2. Again its the non-Goyim meaning je-s.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gostavoadolfos2023 I mean if Saudi Arabia accepted many migrants who are non-Muslim Whom many are treated decently and if there have already been rights to them and if the Ottoman empire gave rights to Christians same with the Abbasids and Umayyads then i don't think that the ''Evil Muslim Sunni Arab Majority'' are going to kill and expel everyone who isn't like them also Sharia not ''Shariaa'' is literally Islamic law that was made by Muslim scholars in 9th or 10th century entirely based by the Quran, Hadith and Sunnah not anything else, i mean it basically tells Muslims the instructions on how to do Ablution, how to pray, when and how to give Charity, When to Fast and What is Halal (permitted) or Haram (prohibited) now of course it includes things like on how to rule or how to manage the economy it is also technically a judicial system and btw it gives rights to Christians and Jews as long as they pay their taxes if they are wealthy enough to pay taxes or if they are: Woman, Children, Old, poor and of course sick then they're not obliged to pay these taxes only middle or upper class Healthy Men pay them and the reason why they have to pay taxes is because Muslims have another type of Tax designated by the Quran which is basically giving 2.5% of your wealth to charities or to the needy or as support to the State Yearly and even for that you need a specific amount of Wealth that you would accumulate over a year which other non-Muslims don't so it would be fair to make Muslims pay what they have to as according to their faith and to make non-Muslims also pay up and btw this money will not only help the needy but also support military campaigns build libraries, mosques and Churches as well Hospitals which technically started in the Muslim world and first Continous University started by a Muslim women who is not secular and is very pious in the middle 9th century in Morroco. So if your saying that Sharia is evil then i guess all the Muslims especially those in the US raising 100's of millions of dollars yearly by Charity and Zakat which is commanded by the Shariah are evil or those who help a injured dog or any animal in general as commanded by The Shariah evil as well then i don't know what your perception of evil is also your literally calling the Sunnis as evil who btw account for 80-90% of all Muslims are all evil i mean i am Sunni Arab and half Syrian, half is Palestinian since my father is Palestinian and my mother is Syrian and your basically calling me a person who has been nice to every Muslim and non-Muslim i ever encountered as evil and you might think i am a exception because i might be ''Secular'' well if i am Secular then that means that i believe in a state that has nothing to do with religion that is basically separated from religion and is governed by liberal Values so all the Sinful stuff like Adultery, Alcohol, Some recitational drugs and Gambling are allowed and a person is allowed to say whatever he wants no matter how bad or evil it is and everyone is allowed to be un-modest or i might be Secular by belief like a Muslim that is non practicing like i don't fast or pray or fast or give Zakat when i can then that would of course make me a Kafir (non believing Heretic) which i don't believe in nor do i want to believe in since i am religious and i am a god fearing person so please keep your Liberal secular propaganda elsewhere its tiring dealing with some consumerist Materialistic, Godless, Secular and spoiled Westerner you get fed stuff by the west and that so called ''Friend'' clearly comes from a Family of Haters i mean my friend is a Christian ''ARAB'' yeah those exist so no Arabs are not evil whether Muslim or not nor are they entirely Muslim as according to you and also that friend Syrian Arab Christian friend always goes to Syria he tells me that kids in the neighborhood near his home in Homs are a bit aggressive but he never complains about discrimination and btw he lives in Abu Dhabi (just like me), a city in the UAE which is the country that has City of Dubai and btw this country applies the evil ''Shariah'' yet Christians make up around 10% of the population who are entirely immigrants since this place never had any Christians well prior to discovering Oil and becoming a Wealthy nation that is a hub for migration so yeah a lot of Christians entirely Migrants live there and churches built for these Christians in what you call ''Evil'' Country that applies Shariah also country is mostly Sunni as well yet a lot of Shia Persian Migrants coming from Iran and some Shia natives within the country are not discriminated upon and (no Surprise) the Christian Arab in my class is treated by the Majority Muslims in my class (including me) a really good treatment no discrimination or hatred unlike how a Arab or even Muslim student would be treated in America most of them go through discrimination sometimes by the country or students or teachers of neighbors and more.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1