Comments by "Peter Ford" (@peterford9369) on "MUST-SEE: Attorney issues SOLUTION to bombshell Trump ruling" video.
-
96
-
 @DianeSchoeneck60 That was very informative. And agreeable when, that president is doing that one thing that falls under the, " duties", of the president. Which, all the things you listed about Johnson, etc. is, directly related to presidential duties.
Just because a president makes a speech while he's president, doesn't mean the speech is presidential. Just because a president, writes a personal check while sitting in the oval office, doesn't mean it was meant for honorable transactions.
This is, why immunity cannot be total, at all.
Trumps little phrase, I could shoot someone on 5th ave, and not lose a voter, doesn't mean he couldn't be prosecuted for murder.
This is why trump is guilty of all the things he's accused of. And 0 immunity, should be used as defense. Impeachment or not. Because impeachment, though done by elected officials, would or could be biased. Strictly on the account of politics. Not fact based, like a jury of peers would be. As is shown by this supreme Court.
Thankfully, the biggest percentage of judges, are honest. And don't bend the law for their buddies. Who offer bribes of any form. This is why there needs to be a reshuffling of our judicial system. A changing of the so-called guard. When corruption, enters a system and there is no oversight to that corruption, that system is useless.
1
-
1