Comments by "Peter Ford" (@peterford9369) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

I thought this was a " new", recently found tape? This is the same deposition he was givin months ago. Seems as long as he takes the 5th, all the questions don't give us anything new. As long as he's allowed to use the 5th, it's not a proven guilt. Even if, the 5th, is said to be an admission, it seems legally it can't be. He may as well say, I'm not sure. It's disgusting his behavior.
15
Why aren't they giving a witness better comm volume?
14
Oooo, that testify clause is really gonna hurt someone. She'll be spilling some guts if she is honest about it.
6
DeSantis has a gift of trump sidestep and gibberish talk.
5
Well it's about time for his kids to put him into a hospital. He's truly gone over the mental hill. Who's Gina? Speech writer? 😶‍🌫️. But these people in this thread saying they're going to vote for Desantrump or trumpaswamey. Go ahead, because their names won't be on the ballot. And when you write it in, you'll be taking a vote from trump. You have my blessing.
4
@drmayeda1930 I know. Why televise it but not do better audio. Kinda defeats the purpose.
3
@ttcc5273 If she testifies truthfully, hard to believe, she could truly have some shit to tell against trump. That's yet to be seen. But she agreed, under oath. Lie again... hello orange jumpsuit.
3
@Athena Bongard I don't think thats fair. The virus is a proven killer. This is not, hair color, or wearing jeans to work. This is possible life or death for soneone with a weakened immune system or something else that could be lethal if they got infected,due to close proximity to a virus contagious person. There is no mandate in Michigan yet. Most governments want to be fair. What's the big damn deal getting the shot? I'm the most skeptical person around, doing everything just cause the gov says. But I went ahead and got the shots. Two 15 minute sessions and I'm done. But I still wear a mask that I don't like, but if it helps save someone,,,, what's the damn big deal? Especially if it's a child u breath on or an older person. Swallow your supposed pride or your loyalty to right wing sobs, and take the shot. You're not sacrificing any rights.
2
Trump LOST THE POPULAR VOTE, JERK. As well as the electoral segment as well. So don't give us your crap that fairness is not being had. It's not like people are trying to take rights from an honest applicant. Djt, is NOT!! An honest applicant.
2
No matter what djt says, what anyone says, about djt shirking his duty or being directly involved in the capital attack. He sat and watched it on TV and did nothing. When what he could and should have done is, come out with a statement to STOP! This is not the way. It's his duty to protect Americans from attackers foreign and domestic. Therefore he did not even do the bare minimum, to protect the Congress members from domestic terrorists. Funny how he remembered all the hate speech, but forgot what street he's going to walk down, until someone probably drew it on a que card. Pennsylvania Ave. Pennsylvania Ave. Then suddenly he says he loves Pennsylvania Ave. Right. The moronic liar and chief.
2
@storksforever2000 Sometimes I wonder if they think,,,to anything. It's like,, automatic. Their indoctrinated into a position and anything that doesn't agree is wrong.
1
Heres the problem. All the words Jim Jordan, Mr Comer and the other dude threw out, defaming Joe Biden, were said without real evidence. People heard these accusations and were told they were fact. Why aren't these people made to either distinguish these accusations as heresay or take back these slanderous speaks? This is the same type of lies used to attack Hillary Clinton in 2016, causing probably thousands of voters to question her honesty, therefore not voting for her. How can these slanderous points be spoken without any proof? By these representatives who were elected by people thinking they would tell the truth.
1
@LaLynn-w7t Now we can't get cocky. Remember what happened when the Republicans boasted, a Red wave. They ended up with a drinking fountain. We can't have that. We need a big win just to give us, say so. And to show these Republicans, they gotta change or die.
1
@liberalweirdo7886 I think her record of answering questions is great. Especially considering she constantly has to tell some people,,,three times, and they don't get it, or act like they don't.
1
If I didn't know better, id say the defense got the professor to say, Trump is obviously guilty, because he had total involvement of the insurrection before, during, and after. All 3 of the points of validity to him being guilty and ineligible for being on the ballot.
1
It's ridiculous to take a vote when obviously the Republicans have a majority and will no doubt stick together just like the Dems. This is a sham if the witnesses are not honest or have bias. My point is, Mr Comer and others made 100% claims against Joe Biden before any facts, only accusations. This should be reprimanded.
1
They talk a good game, but it's never enough. People who live totally on retirement SS, not because they didn't work enough...to qualify for an amount that gives them a decent existence, is ridiculous. In supposedly the richest country in the world? America should be ashamed of itself. First for it coming to that. Second for even considering... making it worse. Just to keep the wealthy from paying ALL, they should be. It's sickening.
1
 @acdover It's still a sentence, in a sense. He's basically guilty and his sentence, is how much the fine will be. And maybe other things. So it's still, a sentence.
1
Personally I think the putz should have been charged and at least convicted of unintentional man slaughter. And carrying a loaded weapon with intent to possibly do more than defend himself. He knew exactly what he intended and intended to use deadly force.
1
Wow! Its so strange. These 2 non political, loyal IRS workers are sworn to work for the American people in regards to people not paying their share of taxes. But djt has shirked his duties of taxes for YEARS. And where were these 2 loyal agents then? Also, this investigation of Hunter has been going on since 2017. While djt was in office. Why did it take 2 years while trump was king and now 2 years of the Biden term. And suddenly miraculously here comes the accusations now. Just before election time. Ahh, do we smell a Hillary Clinton attack on Joe Biden? Hell yes we do. These charges will never be proven, because they're bogus. But just as with Hillary,,,bash Biden in hopes of pulling people away from Joe Biden. Oh and there are hundreds of non maga people who are sided with djt. Why do i say this? Not because I am a Hunter Biden cultist, but because these 2 loyal non biased IRS trump placed agents, saw nothing wrong with any of the shady tax deals that djt pulled off for years and especially while he was president.
1
@graemebr How can there be errors, if they're not spoken to? When he claims, the 5th, it doesn't verify nor nullify the accusations. Seems until he is made to answer the questions, or they are proven by evidence, which I'm sure they have, he hasn't admitted to anything. I'm sure he's guilty as sin and has done everything they suggest in this proceeding. But up until they go into a courtroom and put the facts they have, on a whiteboard, for all to see, he'll claim innocence. And millions of people will accept his claim. This is why he takes the 5th. When he's asked, are you the head of the trump organization, and liable for decisions made there? If he says no, and proven later to have lied. He's sunk. If he says yes. He's sunk. What the hell does, same answer, say? I know it's, due process... but it seems like time and money wasted. When he's allowed to plead the 5th, with seemingly no value for the prosecution. And more delay for him. Despite maybe the inconvenience. But watching his smug face and semi belligerent attitude , is gag rendering.
1
@blueforest4589 No, I'm saying, maybe time could be saved by just getting his ass on a witness stand, put all this evidence up on a monitor, and give it to a jury. And quit pussyfooting around with him. These depositions show nothing to the public. And face it, his future will be made by the public more harshly if a larger majority see the proof of his guilt. Or innocence, as u say. Not very many criminals, graciously admit that what they did, was wrong. A deposition full of, same answer, responses. Do nothing. And I don't think a deposition is a necessity for making a case, unless yes or no, is expected.
1
@blueforest4589 I agree! IF !!! information is received. But I did think about it after I hit send. And maybe an answer of, the 5th, is telling. Because the description is, " because the answer,MAY, tend to incriminate me. So maybe that in and of itself is incriminating. So I'll heal to the fact that a deposition is a part of the process. It's just, when it comes to him, he takes every form of legal q&a, and turns it into a rally announcement for his benefit.
1
@blueforest4589 Question ❓. Do you think a person on bail for a serious crime should have the exact same rights as a regular citizen? People out on bail, generally have certain restrictions put upon them. Why should trump be treated any different than any other person out on bail? Why should trump, have to be read everything 10 times, because he's a belligerent ahole? You keep saying, he doesn't have to do anything. It's up to the prosecution to prove his guilt. Then maybe we also treat him like many other criminals and make him stay in jail, awaiting his trial. You keep talking about equal justice under the law. Seems to me, they've gone to extreme lengths to cater to him. He's the one defying the rules.
1
@wetcheetofart Of course, laws were made by people. Regular people like you and me. There are laws, on the books that would make you cringe. That's why there are amendments. That's why some laws, aren't enforced. Because they are ridiculous. You're right, I'm no lawyer. But I see fairness and common sense in the practice of the legal process. And like you or anyone else that places our comments on these videos, I have my opinion. But I also have the ability for my opinion to be flexible. That's why we have the ability to see reason. Also the ability to make a point without totally thinking it through. I'm still, up in the air about the 5th amendment though. I don't think it's well defined. But, that's once again, just my opinion. Just like it's your opinion that just because I'm not a lawyer, means I don't have the right to have a legal opinion. Where do you think jurors come from? Ordinary citizens having a persons future in their hands.
1
@wetcheetofart P.S. how many of our " congressmen", are lawyers? Yet they make laws, that you and I have to follow all the time.
1
@blueforest4589 First of all. You answered your first question with your own translation. And yes, I'm referring to the deposition questions. Second, I did accept the premise that the deposition is a part of the process. Even though it gave nothing to the questions when the 5th is used 400 times. Because no matter how you define or take the 5th , it's not an answer that a jury can use . My opinion. I do not, disagree that we have rights, and they should be adhered to. But also a defendant also has a responsibility follow judges orders right? And no matter what you say about our rights. Once you are indicted, your rights are diminished because you are no longer totally innocent. You ve been deemed by a grand jury to be guilty enough to be guilty of a crime. And from that point until you are deemed innocent by the law, your rights are restricted. He's already been CONVICTED, as a sexual deviant. The judge called him a rapist. Though he books show abuser, as the recorded crime. Bottom line is, you keep referring to him as, just another person, who's been accused...of something. I refer to him as a convicted rapist, that's been, " indicted", of dozens of crimes. Of which the majority of America and probably the world, believe he's guilty of. But if YOU, want him to be the poor little guy accused of minimal crimes like maybe petty shop lifting, you keep defending him. I'm not.
1
@blueforest4589 Rally time. 🤖 You have conveniently forgotten to copy and paste the rest of the courts findings. You know, the ones that rejected call for a hold on the case to proceed. The case is based on trump and family, paying fines for his fraud crimes. She doesn't care about making him sell all his overrated scumbag holdings. She is intent on proving his fraudulent practices and doing biz in the state anymore. He can continue to con his supporters for the 250 million plus shes going after. I'm sure he has enough sleazy properties to raise it. If they're not all over mortgaged or whatever. That's the case. And as for knowing the term," innocent until proven guilty", being something ya learn in highschool. I don't remember having that class. But I'm sure it was mentioned if you get in trouble cheating on a test or something. Anyway I know it and agree with it. But in trumps case, I think he's more than likely guilty as not. Tell me. Do you believe he attacked Miss Carroll?
1
@blueforest4589 Ooo, you sure got me alright. No answer to my question ❓ Why not? Rally time.
1
Every one of these Republicans run on bringing down the deficit, the spending. And who pays? The low income, the average American. Never the BILLIONAIRES! Why?
1
@onewhowatchesfromveryveryfar That's not really true. The fact is that, any person that has done a certain crime against the constitution, is not supposed to be eligible to gain or run for a government office. That's all this is about. Now so far, he hasn't been legally convicted. So what they're trying to do here is do it by the state not putting his name on the ballot. That doesn't mean anyone in the state can't write his name in. It would still count as a vote. If they find him guilty of whichever charge, then possibly he could be removed from ballots more officially. And sorry to tell you but, more Americans say they would not vote for him than would. Especially if he is convicted. Face the facts. He did make all of the plans for all the crap that was supposed to happen and what did happen on Jan 6 th. And that, my friend, is breaking everything every bit of the oath he SWORE ON THE BIBLE, he swears he reads, about defending the constitution. We all saw it. We watched it. We heard it. Just because he didn't say it point blank. Doesn't mean he didn't know exactly what he was insinuating. And almost every one of the people that were in on it, are going to tell it in court. To get lessened punishment.
1
The only problem with getting trump off the ballot is, the votes it'll give to someone like Ron Desantrump. Who is a trump clone 100%.
1
Sorry Annie but your colleagues across the aisle don't give a crap about keeping things running. Just keeping their cushy 200 grand a year, do nothing jobs. By pleasing trump.
1