Comments by "HomerOJSimpson" (@Homer-OJ-Simpson) on "Wendover Productions"
channel.
-
772
-
534
-
490
-
314
-
246
-
183
-
172
-
146
-
68
-
67
-
64
-
56
-
55
-
50
-
47
-
46
-
39
-
37
-
36
-
31
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
21
-
21
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
@tren133 Regarding subsidies China gives Tesla:
- The subsidy accounted for around 3% to 6% of the cost of the best-selling electric vehicles in China last year, a Reuters analysis found.
- The subsidy, paid to the automaker at the point of purchase, began in 2009 and was scaled back over time. It paid out nearly $15 billion to encourage EV purchases through 2021, according to an estimate by China Merchants Bank International.
Another article:
- Tesla may be operating a wholly-owned factory in China, but the company became the most heavily subsidized electric vehicle maker in the country in 2020 nonetheless. Last year, Tesla China received CNY 2.1 billion ($325 million) in government subsidies for new energy vehicles, the highest amount granted to a carmaker in the country.
- Following right behind Tesla was BYD, which was the second most-subsidized electric vehicle maker in China last year. BYD received CNY 2 billion worth of subsidies for selling 117,000 qualified EVs in 2020. Overall, China granted subsidies for 584,900 new energy vehicles last year, a 12-fold increase from 2016. During this period, sales of electric cars in China increased 27 times to 13.7 million units.
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@dianapennepacker6854 Yes, Vietnam is already fast growing. One of the fastest in Asia the past 15 or so years. Philippine I see online that service sector passed up manufacturing and the biggest part of service is "Business Process Outsourcing (BPO)".
Definition: Business process outsourcing (BPO) is a method of subcontracting various business-related operations to third-party vendors.
Broadly speaking, companies adopt BPO practices in the two main areas of back-office and front-office operations. Back office BPO refers to a company contracting its core business support operations such as accounting, payment processing, IT services, human resources, regulatory compliance, and quality assurance to outside professionals who ensure the business runs smoothly.
By contrast, front office BPO tasks commonly include customer-related services such as tech support, sales, and marketing.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bobdobsin6216 ok, so clear you an extreme pro gun person like OP. Your original comment suggested you are likely actually MORE bias than even OP. What both of you are suggesting is that researchers on Australia gun issue did terrible work — and so did the experts that were part of the peer review. In addition, you are suggesting it’s completely a coincidence that all other gun research has reached similar findings that stronger gun laws and lower gun ownership rates lead to reduced murders. You are also saying that if there is an occurrence of some incident 12 times in 10 years, major reform, than no such incident in nearly 20 years that it’s a pure coincidence despite everything else also supporting it.
But hey, talk about bias — you spend a considerably time in post arguing about how guns are needed then used used misleading data to try a prove a point. For example, the defensive gun usage was a poll in the 90’s were gun owning people were simply asked if they had used their gun in defensive situation which can include going to check out a noise outside or in the barn. They don’t have to pull the gun out, or use it, nor stop a crime, nor even have it confirmed. And then you compare it to what? Imagine how many offensive gun usages there — which includes all crimes committed with a gun on the person, a threat to use a gun, or just having a gun when they went to do something.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1