General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

HomerOJSimpson
OBF
comments

Comments by "HomerOJSimpson" (@Homer-OJ-Simpson) on "OBF" channel.

Previous
7
Next
...
All

@vitojosie I never said every country US invested in was a success. I also said that japan did it on their own after the 1960 and the first HSR cost about as much as the whole help from the US a decade earlier
1
@erikjj235 yes, given that any topic about China or one of Chinas enemy is flooded with Chinese nationalist or their .50 RMB army i will guess he’s Chinese
1
@timbehrens9678 Russian bots are out everywhere
1
@KirkFickert you do know that russia using a nuke on NATO would mean nukes on Russia. Putin maybe a dictator but those around him want to live and want russia to exist so no way will they allow Putin to drop nukes on NATO. This is why the use of conventional weapons against russia would only be on the soldiers in Ukraine and Black Sea, not in Russia. You understand this, right? Or do you think no one in the military and Putin himself don’t care for the destruction of their country and family? Anyways, the theory is that Russia would use the nuke only if they thought there would be no consequences. They use a nuke strike because Ukraine doesn’t have one. They would no use nukes on NATO.
1
@TomatoToMaToes69 Mici Boo lied that US dropped tactical nukes on Yugoslavia. It’s a gnome. Also, @Lena appears to be a paid Putin pal just like Mici Boo
1
@miciboo9993 oh, and what’s your source that nukes were used on Serbia? Nothing? You know who brings serbia up a lot? Russians — so you might be outing yourself as Russian.
1
@Lena-vw6ye so you’re saying Russia is indeed crazy enough to use nuclear with no precedence of nukes beings used in a world with multiple nations having nukes? But you’re saying the US and and Europe won’t respond to Russians nuclear use because there no precedence of the them intervening when a military uses a nuclear weapon. Everyone can see the purposeful terrible logic being use here
1
@tsugumorihoney2288 does Russia want a Moscow and Sochi in dust just so they can have a Ukraine in dust? I’m confused what you’re arguing — do Russians not care for their lives?
1
@Lena-vw6ye US won’t do anything? Probably because Putin isn’t insane enough to use a nuke which would lead to his country being destroyed.
1
Still trust EU far more than the PRC.
1
@sid-fp6bi like typical Beijing worker, u bring up the US having police in other countries while ignoring those police have approval, are open, and are often invited as training programs. Nice try. This is about china running SECRET police stations without that host government approval.
1
@sid-fp6bi and if anyone is interested in how mis info accounts work, look at Sid comment at the top here. He’s aware of the US police stations and locations which most people aren’t. So if he’s aware of those details, he fully knows that those police stations are working with the local governments and invited. He also knows Chinas police station were not invited and are in secret. So how do you mislead people as part of a pro CCP prop-gânda? Ignore lots of relevant information and make a simple comment that US is like China with both having police stations abroad.
1
@lmao2351 part of the reason Sweden has a “high” crime rate is simply reporting. Sweden captures are a lot more crime than others simply based on how often people actually report crimes and how the government collects the data.
1
@DilbeardAlbeard Win Tan, you’re Asian right? So an immigrant to Sweden?
1
@DilbeardAlbeard no I’m not an OJ nor a Homer
1
@Lena-vw6ye hey pro Putin (yes, I can see your other comments). Anyone following the war would know that Ukraine doesn’t have long range missiles, no good fighter Jets, no navy, no advance missile system. The best they got is HIMARS and we’re only given missiles that can go 50km while US has missiles that can go 300km. Learn to do your job better.
1
@SuperCrow02 there are multiple ways to adress it and and if you look it up, all experts say the solution include much higher increase in sanctions with support from China and India as well as an all out assault on Russian troops in Ukraine. That assault on Russian troops can be directly from the US/NATO or US/NATO giving Ukraine access to the top weapons. Instead of 50km HIMARS, it would be 300km HIMARS so all Russian troops in Ukraine are now easily hit. They would give them advance missile system. Possibly advance drones. Etc. Would russia respond with nukes on NATO? I don’t know, does russia want Russia to be destroyed with nukes as well?
1
@SuperCrow02 also, lots of people who don’t really think this out don’t realize how dangerous it would be to not punish Russia if they used nukes. Without punishment, it sets the standard now that using nukes on offense has almost no major negative consequences thus nothing to stop Russia doing it on all other countries who don’t have nukes as well as other countries with nukes doing the same. Imagine China now using nukes to take Taiwan, the South China Sea and much more.
1
@SuperCrow02 do you think Putin is so evil he doesn’t care that millions of Russian would die in nuclear attacks if Putin uses nukes on NATO? Do you think every person that would be involved in approving and following through on the orders to use nukes also are so terrible they don’t care for the lives of millions and millions of Russians dying in a nuke attack? My point is that Putin will push as far as he can until the point it means nukes on Russia. If there is no military response to Russia using nukes in Ukraine, Putin will keep taking everything he wants by using nukes.
1
@SuperCrow02 such sanctions as you describe are likely impossible— it would require China and India and others to not buy Russian oil or gas. That may be impossible. They might agree to some cut backs or sanctions on other Russian goods but ultimately that wouldn’t be enough to completely shut down Russia. You know what Russians value more than their money? Their lives. So Russian would put up with 10% or 20% decline in gdp to keep fighting in Ukraine and to use nukes but they won’t put up with deaths of millions of Russian civilians. You agree?
1
@SuperCrow02 do you think Putin is so evil he doesn’t care that millions of Russian would die in nuclear attacks if Putin uses nukes on NATO? Do you think every person that would be involved in approving and following through on the orders to use nukes also are so terrible they don’t care for the lives of millions and millions of Russians dying in a nuke attack? My point is that Putin will push as far as he can until the point it means nukes on Russia. If there is no military response to Russia using nukes in Ukraine, Putin will keep taking everything he wants by using nukes.
1
@SuperCrow02 nobody said anything about NATO troops inside Ukraine. Do you think drones don’t exist? Or airplanes? Missiles?? Just to confirm I’m not dealing with Ivan from Russia, please confirm whether you think Putin and those around him care zero about having millions of Russian dead from nukes if Putin decided to use nukes on NATO? You keep ignoring that question but you highly suggest Putin and those who make the decisions will use nukes first on the west even knowing it would destroy Russia.
1
@SuperCrow02 just seems to me you are indeed Ivan from Russia. You ignored the question many times if Putin and all those involved in a decision to use a nuke on NATO care that Millions of Russian would die in a nuke retaliation. You also seem to twist my argument around in order for you to low key defend Russia.
1
@SuperCrow02 uneducated type that things drones and planes require troops on the ground in Ukraine? Come on man, you know drones and planes are up in the air and can be based outside of Ukraine. US literally took out Al qaeda top guy a few months ago in the capital of Afghanistan without troops on the ground — it was an attack from above from a drone that started well outside of Afghanistan. Do you really know this little or just trying not to answer questions so you can low key defend Putin?
1
@SuperCrow02 Educate yourself and watch the video from TLDR News “what if Putin goes nuclear” or what former US General David Patreas. General Phillip Breedlove has also said Similar (look up on YouTube “ former general explains how the west would respond if Putin used a nuke” on Times Radio channel). They are all saying the same story — US Likely would respond with aerial campaigns to take out all Russian positions in Ukraine and Black Sea.
1
@isaihernandez4136 "The difference being that China now is arguably militarily superior to all the countries around" I guarantee you have never used that to defend the actions of other countries not named Chin.a.
1
@isaihernandez4136 " I am a realist" is what I always hear from those defending China. ". I believe any powerful country act based on the its own interests which lead to win-lose situations. " Countries intersted and value systems vary. Adolph H and UK both acted in their own interested in WW2 but would you say they both equal? Your defense of China here falls apart because you suggest Adolph H is the same as Churchill.
1
@frka.836 "Then must of these are directed to country generally in a war, the same who are kicking France out, and when in a stabled country, they are stolen by the politicians, " How far back you going? I'm discussing the past 30 or so years and not war related. Parts of it are also stolen by the corrupt politicians which is why these bailout loans usually have many strings attached because they often included human rights reforms, economic reforms, democracy reforms, etc. "So, naturally after 10 years, when you compare, the average person see nothing of those loans. " The problem is that bailouts isn't something that the people actually can see or touch and they thus don't value it as much as it truly is valuable.
1
@frka.836 I agree that EU should be providing loans besides bailout loans. The issue is how to compete with CHina when China's loans are for their own projects with little care of safety or environmental concerns. EU (the west in general) has a history of adding a lot of 'regulations' to their project that increase the cost of the project. I do believe the EU should be far less concern with safety and minimum wages for these projects in order to compete with China. That seems to be what you want so EU should do that.
1
@frka.836 FYI, when why topic of a video includes China, it will be flooded with Chinese nationalist and vvumaos (vv = w)
1
@Lucas-vr1qr the evidence is right in front of me? Yeah, I’ve seen the Xinjian police files and china files — two sets of documents detailing their plan to mass arrest and beat detainees.
1
@Lucas-vr1qr the evidence in front of me also includes evidence of majority of religious sites being demolished or damaged, countless testimonies from Uyghurs, etc.
1
@Lucas-vr1qr oh, in case you didn’t notice that when you spell “genocide” it often gets removed from YT. I only found your comment complaining about my spelling in your vvumao history but it doesn’t show up otherwise
1
@Lucas-vr1qr vvumao .50 RMB Army
1
@Lucas-vr1qr why are u subscribed to YouTubers paid by CCP to promote the CCP?
1
@isaihernandez4136 vvumao, why are you in support of the gên -ide in xinj?
1
@isaihernandez4136 you asked questions then literally went on to defend china on it. How predictable that you defend evil actions
1
@krombopulos_michael cheaper housing shouldn’t even be built on such an expensive and luxury construction. I’d say allow all luxury (or whatever the market demands) than just take the heavy taxes from it to help pay for affordable homes elsewhere where the money can build a lot more homes.
1
@PutXi_Whipped so why do you deny the evidence of the gén -ide? Did you read the Xinjiang Police Files detailing their plan? It’s literally CCP documents.
1
@PutXi_Whipped did guy read the previous china cables also detailing their plan? Or read the testimonies from countless number of Uyghurs?
1
@PutXi_Whipped or did you see the evidence that majority of Islamic religious sites were demolished or damaged?
1
@williamthesilent1849 they actually do — while some of them live in a free country. Others get in vpn to avoid their govt but only to defend that same govt.
1
@brendon1689 " i responded topically and you replied with "genocide in Xinjiang" " Topically by misleading in an attempt to defend China and be negative on EU. The fact you cannot acknowledge whats going on in Xijian proves it.
1
@balabanasireti Coming from the guy with various anti-EU and pro-China comments. Why are you a supporting of gen-ide in 2022 China?
1
@balabanasireti europe did something awful to Africa like what China is doing in 2022 to Uyghurs
1
@grisflyt there isn’t one In Xinjian? But it literally fits the definition of one per the UN. Are you saying they haven’t rounded up millions of innocent and sent them to one of the nearly 400 identified facilities created (or modified) in the past 5 or so years? And you’re saying the countless testimonies from Xinjian population isn’t true? The pics of religious sites disappearing from its location is also not true? The many leaked CCP documents and many of them public documents aren’t true?
1
@grisflyt “China May be bad” but you just did a vvumao and said they aren’t doing anything bad in Xinjian based on your .50 RMB contract
1
@carkawalakhatulistiwa "uni Eropa pland" No idea what that means. "Africa must be poor" poorest region in the world. That's why millions of Africans have made their way to Europe and many more attempted.
1
@Zaydan Naufal who ever said Europe didn’t have any Gen -ides? Defending what Serbia did is like def did what China is doing so you’re point is lost when you defend them
1
@Zaydan Naufal are you saying you support the gen ide against Kosovo?
1

Previous
7
Next
...
All