Comments by "HomerOJSimpson" (@Homer-OJ-Simpson) on "What TAIWAN can learn from UKRAINE (and what it can't) - VisualPolitik EN" video.

  1.  @Kevin-mk6jo  wow, talk about anti-Semitic. If you actually think the Iranian regime is more trustworthy than the the Israeli regime with nukes, then maybe you’re the type that still wishes the man with the little mustache had won ww2. And you’re not behind honest saying Jews have never lived on that land before nor are you honest about how and why Jews in large numbers ended up there between 1900-1950.
    10
  2.  @Chou-seh-fu  he is paid to defend china. Well, V acts like it. He subscribed to a few YouTubers who are working for the Chinese government to defend China
    8
  3.  @junkeatng  why do you watch Daniel Dumrill and The Barrets? And why won’t you just say what’s happening in Xinjiang?
    7
  4.  @peepeepoopyhead510  that other guy with the mustache in red also expelled many Jews so I can see why he liked Soviets
    4
  5.  @Kevin-mk6jo  “let’s not dismiss the valid points I made while I made hateful comments and misleading statements at times”. That’s you
    4
  6.  @junkeatng  “the rhetoric of EU and US has also faded as Russia is making gains”. Wow, spotted a paid account. 3 high profile leaders of the EU just visited Ukraine last week, that includes France Germany and Italy leaders. And they recently passed an EU bill to ban all Russian oil by the end of the year. And the US just approved another major round of aid to Ukraine. No surprise the guy who subscribes to Chinese govt paid YouTubers is also not being truthful about Ukraine - Russia
    4
  7.  @thelonegerman2314  and you believe in authoritarian oppressive rule?
    3
  8. A blockade of Taiwan would mean China would have to attack the US and it’s Allie’s. So at that point, China has lost.
    2
  9.  @emperorjonz9590  “abusing freedom of navigation”…you mean by attacking American ships that will force their way into Taiwan to support Taiwan. I don’t think you are even thinking this through — you seem to suggest that China will out large scale ships preventing American ships from passing through all around Taiwan as if the US would then not go through. Let me ask you, just to make sure you aren’t extremely pro China bias “emperor Jonz”, what is going on in Xinjiang? Would you admit it something that starts with ‘gên’ and ends in ‘ocide’?
    2
  10.  @Verpal  emperor Jonz is a Chinese govt Vumao. “Abusing the freedom of navigation”…he thinks the US and taiwans Allie’s will simply not go to Taiwan because China has hundred ships surrounding Taiwan? The US already regularly sends ships in areas that China and others illegally claim so that freedom of navigation is ensured. The US and it’s allies will not allow China to claim all waters around Taiwan so China will literally have to fire on American ships to claim the waters.
    2
  11.  @emperorjonz9590  don’t forget to let us know what is happening in Xinjiang so we know empeoror Jonz isn’t a puppet of the PRC
    2
  12.  @Verpal  maritime militias? The ones that the US blew by with ships? And you think that after the US said they will help Taiwan, they will not send aid through a blockade? It’s up to china to attack the US. Furthermore, you are aware the US has by far the superior navy? Add in that Japan (arguably 3rd strongest navy) would join and maybe even France and England (so 4 of the top 5 or 6 navyies). Yes, China can disrupt shipping but unless they attack the US/Japanese/allies ships, they won’t have a true blockade. Do you think the US would just not send any aid through blockade? And how will China enforce that blockade? I don’t know why you people refuse to just say it — China will indeed need to attack US ships to have a blockade.
    2
  13.  @kucanusa3750  mandatory gun ownership? Maybe the rest though
    2
  14.  @Kevin-mk6jo  If you actually think the Iranian regime is more trustworthy than the the Israeli regime with nukes, then maybe you’re the type that still wishes the man with the little mustache had won ww2.
    2
  15.  @youtubeoppressivecensorshi8047  is you’re username related to how so many comments don’t show up? Or something else?
    2
  16. Vvumao
    1
  17. No, they cannot starve Taiwan without attacking US and Allies. You won’t answer how they can starve Taiwan without attacking the US and Allies ships
    1
  18.  @Verpal  going to reiterate the last point — do you think the US will not try to get ships through if China uses that militia navy? And how will China enforce such a blockade without attacking the US and ally ships? Why are you people refusing to acknowledge it will take china attacking US (and allies) ships to have an actual blockade?
    1
  19.  @Verpal  “not official militias” so they will be destroyed easily by the US with no repercussion from China? Or they will be fully considered part of China and China will face repercussions on how that militia acts. So in the first, they don’t do an actual blockade. In the second, China will have to attack the US to have an actual blockade. “Whilst yes the US will be able to send some ships through, that’s not my point”. But that is THE point of all of this. The OP started by discussing a blockade of Taiwan and I have been pointing out that for an actual blockade to occur, China will HAVE to attack US ships (and Allies such as Japan, UK and France or whoever joins). You agree on that part? Oh, and if those militias try to do a blockade on Taiwan, they will certainly be destroyed easily so all of that point is moot. It’s just a small temporary hold on shipping as the US destroys those ships
    1
  20.  @Verpal  “civilian ship”. So it’s not militia or armed? Then what good is this “militia”? Sounds like the “militia” won’t do anything and all this discussion is pointless. And we are back to the main point V (the user we both replied to) made and my counter to V that any actual blockade will require china to fire on the US and the allies. Do you agree that any actual blockade will require china firing on US and allies? Are you even reading what I’m saying?? All of this started with V and I pointed out that a blockade will require china to fire on the US and allies. The “militia” will be no part of any actual blockade and it’s not much relevant to anything major in regards to this discussion about china invading or doing something major against taiwan
    1
  21.  @Verpal  you and I replied to him. I replied to you about that other guy (even you brought up freedom of navigation that China will have to prevent). I stated from the start all of that but you have consistently refused to even say “yes, China will have to attack the US in order to have an actual blockade” so it really seems like you don’t want to admit that for some reason. You could have clarified at any point “yes, China would have to attack the US for an actual blockade BUT I believe what we will see is militias”. And you’re militia argument makes no sense to this discussion..you said it’s civilians and attacking them would look bad. Ok? Then they are not militias and they may try to do some harassments but even you must admit that it won’t be much a problem in regards to the bigger discussion being had here so it’s not a big concern.
    1
  22.  @Verpal  the difference between me and you is I have clarified many times my views on the militia as well as on blockade. You refusing to speak directly about the blockade or flat out saying China won’t be able to blockade makes it appear you are conflating whatever this militia does with a blockade that was being discussed by the person you originally responded to (@V) and me who also kept that discussion going.
    1
  23.  @emperorjonz9590  “abusing freedom of navigation” how? You never responded. It’s clear it means China will have to fire on the US and Allies because US and Allies currently send ships through the straight to enforce freedom of navigation. Nice try vvumao
    1
  24.  @thelonegerman2314  the US is a democracy with some flaws that could be improved. You suggesting it’s basically like Russia or China just proves my point you support authoritarian oppressive regimes. You mention “systematically conditioned on how to think”…what do you think the purpose of Putin and Xi managing all news in their country is for? Why can’t you admit that China and Russia and others like them are far worse. You won’t because you are trying to equate them to the west in order to defend them
    1
  25. Comrade Zhou, i totally believe you. Free Xinjiang! Free Tibet! Free Hong Kong! Free West Taiwan!
    1
  26.  @junkeatng  the problem for China is that western consumers will force the brands to decide in either staying in China but getting boycotted in the west or leaving china and keeping the Western markets open. That will lead to a lot of western firms taking the losses in China and leaving the China market. But hey, you subscribe to paid CCP YouTubers like the Barrets so you’re interest here is defending China
    1
  27.  @junkeatng  “a new world order is taking shape”. That’s your way of saying why you support the oppressive the oppressive Chinese govt? The Barrett’s (who you follow) have been caught working on behalf of the Chi government. As is Daniel Dumrill who also works on behalf of the Chi govt. so you like to subscribe to westerners paid to defend china?
    1
  28.  @junkeatng  I’m describing the people you subscribe too — they are paid by the Chinese government to defend China’s govt, just like you. For example, what’s happening in Xinjiang?
    1
  29.  @junkeatng  EU is still buying Russian oil but have cut orders by 18% and will be cutting almost 100% be end of the year. How does that relate to anything you say? It’s obvious you do Not want the EU to stop buying Russian gas so enough with the fake concern vvumao
    1
  30. People didn’t think Ukraine had the will to fight and yet here we are. Free Xinjiang! Free Tibet! Free West Taiwan from the PRC!
    1
  31. I’m totally going to believe someone who subscribes to far right wing YouTubers. FYI, dinesh d'souza is a spreader or false news and info..pushing nothing but conspiracy theories
    1
  32.  @Nethan2000  The founding fathers applied the second amendment only to the federal government and states would be able to choose their own gun laws. That only changed in 2008 and 2010 as a very conservative court rewrote gun history and re-interpreted the 2A to now apply to the states and no longer justified for needing a militia but for self defense. Don’t trust the conservatives
    1