Comments by "HomerOJSimpson" (@Homer-OJ-Simpson) on "PolyMatter"
channel.
-
1700
-
145
-
119
-
109
-
93
-
88
-
88
-
68
-
67
-
64
-
53
-
53
-
52
-
50
-
46
-
45
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
35
-
34
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
30
-
28
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
20
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@agapp11able
- Most new HSR lines in China have witnessed a sharp decline in their “transportation density”. Measured in passenger-kilometres, it is an indicator that projects the line’s operating efficiency in terms of annual average transport volume per kilometre. For example, while the 1,318-kilometre Beijing-Shanghai HSR corridor’s transportation density was 48 million passenger-kilometres in 2015 and continues to be high, the 1,776-kilometre Lanzhou-Urumqi line has only 2.3 million passenger-kilometres of transportation density. China’s overall transportation density of HSR was 17 million passenger-kilometres in 2015, while it was 34 million passenger-kilometres for Japan’s Shinkansen in the same year.
-
- The craze for HSR has made China neglect the construction of conventional systems, adversely affecting the balance of the country’s logistics mix. As a result, rail has consistently trailed road and water freight transport for the past several years. This has led to growing investments in polluting freight road trucks and trailers, offsetting the environmental gains resulting from HSR.
- In the past few years, mega borrowings by provincial governments to monetise its HSR lines have created a debt trap, which is now pinching the coffers of the state-owned CRC. CRC’s financial woes started nearly four years ago when more than 60 percent of the HSR operators each lost a minimum of US $100 million in 2018. That year, the least profitable operator in Chengdu reported net loss of US $1.8 billion. In the same year, transport economists in China had predicted an impending debt crisis for the country’s HSR that was dependent on “unsustainable government subsidies with many lines incapable of repaying the interest on their debt, let alone principal”, and were caught in a vicious cycle of “raising new debt to pay off old debt”. Consequently, since 2015, CRC’s interest payments have been significantly higher than its operating profits, shrinking its bottom line.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@agapp11able WUMAO, ASPI has a great article on how China often tries to lie and use propaganda videos which wumaos like you then use to say "see, no detention facility of Uyghurs!"
- Last month, Global Times editor Hu Xijin visited what he referred to as a ‘vocational training center’ in Kashgar. He posted a two-minute video of the trip on his Twitter account
- But by July 2017, when construction was complete, every ‘school’ building in the southwest of the facility (previously Middle School No. 5) was surrounded by tall fencing that had been painted green and topped with razor wire. By August, much of School No. 6 was enclosed with similar fencing. Upon completion in around November 2017, School No. 4 was also highly securitised and a tender was released calling for bidders to oversee and install new equipment, including a new surveillance camera system
- The video posted by Hu Xijin of Middle School No. 4 on 24 October shows detainees dancing and playing table-tennis and basketball. However, this visit—and the footage shared on social media—may not reflect the regular daily experiences of the detainees.
- Through satellite and imagery analysis—including imagery updated daily—we can determine that these courts are coloured mats that are recent additions to the camp. The mats were placed on a concrete-covered area that is normally bare and appears inaccessible to detainees.
- Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@agapp11able Basically, these are the points:
1. You only trust the CCP and will not accept anything from any western country be it an humanatarian orginization or legit news org. However, you will accept anything that is from China or supports China.
2.. Aspi identified likely camps and you said they are just schools and drug rehab facilities. You have refused to actually provide a source.. You just consistently saying there are didn’t make it true. Give a source
3. You pointed to the Pichan Facility #4 and said that it's not a detenton facility simply for being near apartments even though the CCP has allowed BBC to visit a low security camp and it was near apartment buildings. In the same video, the bbc attempted to go to another facility in town which was also near apartments but the CCP officials kicked out the BBC from the area and stopped them from filming.
4. ASPI said they identified 380+ very likely facilities. You have only been able to directly point to one and your assumptions on it are wrong (see #3) but yet even if that wasn't a camp, you believe that if you find one facility they were wrong with it means they are wrong with all the remaining 380ish. ASPI has two ratings – ‘likely’ and ‘confirmed’. Even if one or two are wrong, it does not mean that most of the rest are wrong. If they were, why don’t you have evidence on all 380 but instead try to claim about 3 or 4 are wrong?
5. . Asked to make major criticism of the CCP that the CCP hasn’t already acknowledged --- All you did was say “they banned private tutors and healthcare isn’t universal”. You are unable to Give a serious criticism
6. Lied that I said that all 12 million Muslims in Xinjiang were sent to the camps. Me saying 12 million Muslims in Xinjiang doesn’t mean I’m saying all 12 million are or were in camps.
7. Said that Corporations never lie that they use forced labor or sweat shop labor and also argued that since Skechers said their two facilities in China didn't have forced labor, it means China doesn't have any forced labor.
8. Lied and that ASPI had said that there are two million in the camps at this exact moment. Unable to provide a source.
9. Lied that Amnesty International with funded by the CIA with CIA money. It was actually founded by Peter Benenson and Eric Baker and it does not accept donations from governments or governmental organizations.
10. Lied that ASPI funding from Australian governments is only 37%.
11. You literally used CCP 100% controlled news as your sources while you reject anything from the west for whatever reason you can think of. The CCP video also included ‘evidence’ from CCP employee Einar Tangen - Economic and Political Affairs Commentator
CCTV, CGTN, CRI, China.org.cn, Xinhua.
12. You said that Marlabashi Detention center no 1 was in fact a school. Because the Chinese state media source you used cut to a classroom that could be located anywhere. If it was just a school, there would be tons of videos of the school being a school. Kids getting out of class, playing inside those walls, etc. But you won’t provide any such video and just belive the CCP when they say the classroom they showed was indeed inside the facility.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@agapp11able @agapp11able Basically, these are the points:
1. You only trust the CCP and will not accept anything from any western country be it an humanitarian organization or legit news org. However, you will accept anything that is from China or supports China.
2.. Aspi identified likely camps and you said they are just schools and drug rehab facilities. You have refused to actually provide a source.. You just consistently saying there are didn’t make it true. Give a source
3. You pointed to the Pichan Facility #4 and said that it's not a detention facility simply for being near apartments even though the CCP has allowed BBC to visit a low security camp and it was near apartment buildings. In the same video, the bbc attempted to go to another facility in town which was also near apartments but the CCP officials kicked out the BBC from the area and stopped them from filming.
4. ASPI said they identified 380+ very likely facilities. You have only been able to directly point to one and your assumptions on it are wrong (see #3) but yet even if that wasn't a camp, you believe that if you find one facility they were wrong with it means they are wrong with all the remaining 380ish. ASPI has two ratings – ‘likely’ and ‘confirmed’. Even if one or two are wrong, it does not mean that most of the rest are wrong. If they were, why don’t you have evidence on all 380 but instead try to claim about 3 or 4 are wrong?
5. . Asked to make major criticism of the CCP that the CCP hasn’t already acknowledged --- All you did was say “they banned private tutors and healthcare isn’t universal”. You are unable to Give a serious criticism
6. Lied that I said that all 12 million Muslims in Xinjiang were sent to the camps. Me saying 12 million Muslims in Xinjiang doesn’t mean I’m saying all 12 million are or were in camps.
7. Said that Corporations never lie that they use forced labor or sweat shop labor and also argued that since Skechers said their two facilities in China didn't have forced labor, it means China doesn't have any forced labor.
8. Lied and that ASPI had said that there are two million in the camps at this exact moment. Unable to provide a source.
9. Lied that Amnesty International with funded by the CIA with CIA money. It was actually founded by Peter Benenson and Eric Baker and it does not accept donations from governments or governmental organizations.
10. Lied that ASPI funding from Australian governments is only 37%.
11. You literally used CCP 100% controlled news as your sources while you reject anything from the west for whatever reason you can think of. The CCP video also included ‘evidence’ from CCP employee Einar Tangen - Economic and Political Affairs Commentator
CCTV, CGTN, CRI, China.org.cn, Xinhua.
12. You said that Marlabashi Detention center no 1 was in fact a school. Because the Chinese state media source you used cut to a classroom that could be located anywhere. If it was just a school, there would be tons of videos of the school being a school. Kids getting out of class, playing inside those walls, etc. But you won’t provide any such video and just belive the CCP when they say the classroom they showed was indeed inside the facility.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@agapp11able WUMAO, ASPI has a great article on how China often tries to lie and use propaganda videos which wumaos like you then use to say "see, no detention facility of Uyghurs!"
- Last month, Global Times editor Hu Xijin visited what he referred to as a ‘vocational training center’ in Kashgar. He posted a two-minute video of the trip on his Twitter account
- But by July 2017, when construction was complete, every ‘school’ building in the southwest of the facility (previously Middle School No. 5) was surrounded by tall fencing that had been painted green and topped with razor wire. By August, much of School No. 6 was enclosed with similar fencing. Upon completion in around November 2017, School No. 4 was also highly securitised and a tender was released calling for bidders to oversee and install new equipment, including a new surveillance camera system
- The video posted by Hu Xijin of Middle School No. 4 on 24 October shows detainees dancing and playing table-tennis and basketball. However, this visit—and the footage shared on social media—may not reflect the regular daily experiences of the detainees.
- Through satellite and imagery analysis—including imagery updated daily—we can determine that these courts are coloured mats that are recent additions to the camp. The mats were placed on a concrete-covered area that is normally bare and appears inaccessible to detainees. - Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October
- Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October
2
-
2
-
2
-
@agapp11able Basically, these are the points:
1. You only trust the CCP and will not accept anything from any western country be it an humanitarian organization or legit news org. However, you will accept anything that is from China or supports China.
2.. Aspi identified likely camps and you said they are just schools and drug rehab facilities. You have refused to actually provide a source.. You just consistently saying there are didn’t make it true. Give a source
3. You pointed to the Pichan Facility #4 and said that it's not a detention facility simply for being near apartments even though the CCP has allowed BBC to visit a low security camp and it was near apartment buildings. In the same video, the bbc attempted to go to another facility in town which was also near apartments but the CCP officials kicked out the BBC from the area and stopped them from filming.
4. ASPI said they identified 380+ very likely facilities. You have only been able to directly point to one and your assumptions on it are wrong (see #3) but yet even if that wasn't a camp, you believe that if you find one facility they were wrong with it means they are wrong with all the remaining 380ish. ASPI has two ratings – ‘likely’ and ‘confirmed’. Even if one or two are wrong, it does not mean that most of the rest are wrong. If they were, why don’t you have evidence on all 380 but instead try to claim about 3 or 4 are wrong?
5. . Asked to make major criticism of the CCP that the CCP hasn’t already acknowledged --- All you did was say “they banned private tutors and healthcare isn’t universal”. You are unable to Give a serious criticism
6. Lied that I said that all 12 million Muslims in Xinjiang were sent to the camps. Me saying 12 million Muslims in Xinjiang doesn’t mean I’m saying all 12 million are or were in camps.
7. Said that Corporations never lie that they use forced labor or sweat shop labor and also argued that since Skechers said their two facilities in China didn't have forced labor, it means China doesn't have any forced labor.
8. Lied and that ASPI had said that there are two million in the camps at this exact moment. Unable to provide a source.
9. Lied that Amnesty International with funded by the CIA with CIA money. It was actually founded by Peter Benenson and Eric Baker and it does not accept donations from governments or governmental organizations.
10. Lied that ASPI funding from Australian governments is only 37%.
11. You literally used CCP 100% controlled news as your sources while you reject anything from the west for whatever reason you can think of. The CCP video also included ‘evidence’ from CCP employee Einar Tangen - Economic and Political Affairs Commentator
CCTV, CGTN, CRI, China.org.cn, Xinhua.
12. You said that Marlabashi Detention center no 1 was in fact a school. Because the Chinese state media source you used cut to a classroom that could be located anywhere. If it was just a school, there would be tons of videos of the school being a school. Kids getting out of class, playing inside those walls, etc. But you won’t provide any such video and just belive the CCP when they say the classroom they showed was indeed inside the facility.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@fahadahaf "I couldn't find any official IMF source that says this, but I'll take your word for it." There are literally many research reports and investigations in to this. Before I read the rest, this already tells me you have ignored facts your whole life when it comes to China.
"Your original argument was about the US being the biggest consumer market, unless you are going to argue that GDP is a measure of how big a consumer market is; I really don't know why you are explaining PPP to me"
I didn't bring up PPP. I was explaining to someone else why PPP doesn't mean much when it comes to international trade.
>Consumption Markets are usually compared using HFCE, which uses nominal figures that don't account for differing prices. Adjusting for PPP, China is the biggest consumer market.
And there it goes again. Not able to understand PPP. PPP is only good for domestic comparisons. When it comes to trade, oil at $80 a barrel will sell at $80 to everyone. Doesn't matter what your PPP is, you will have to pay $80. Is this something Fahad can understand?
PPP comes into play more regarding domestic services and domestic manufacturing but not international trade. ELY5 (explain it like you're), lets say $1 = 10 yuan. 10 yuan can get you say 1 hour massage in China but $1 in the US gets you 5 minutes. That's where PPP is demonstrating that $1 worth of yuan goes farther than $1 in the US. But that consumer be it individual or business has to buy oil or some other good / resource, the price is the same for everyone. $1 worth of yuan gets you $1 worth of international goods.
And since we are talking about consumer market for foreign goods & services, PPP has no place in such a discussion.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@agapp11able " I listed you my sources lmao."
Yeah, you have used as your sources far:
1. CGTN
2. Graymills
Both are described as "A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per article basis."
And furhtermore, they are described as:
CGTN: Overall, we rate China Global Television Network (CGTN) news Questionable based on promoting pro-state propaganda and heavy censorship
Grayzone: Overall, we rate The Grayzone Far-Left Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and consistent one-sided reporting.
You pick the worse sources.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@agapp11able Oh, there was another person, Bob Carr. He isn't senator but is a left wing retired politician who served as Premier of New South Wales from 1995 to 2005. Funny about that -- The Financial Review of Australia has an article about him titled "How Bob Carr became China's pawn"
- In times past, Carr was not known for promoting or defending China's Communist Party (CCP) government. To the contrary, as Clive Hamilton notes, he was at one time publicly critical of Australia's pro-China lobby, and denounced CCP ideology as a "ludicrously outdated notion". All this changed with his appointment to head the Australia China Relations Institute at the University of Technology in Sydney in 2014. Since then he has come to personify the lobby he once attacked, lauding the achievements of Xi Jinping and condemning his critics.
- ACRI has provided Carr with the public platform he lost with the end of his brief tenure as foreign minister and again he has a strong media presence.
- In China it is unlikely that any program organiser would turn down the opportunity of including Bob Carr. In a country where the UN Declaration counts for little, few can speak their minds, and none are permitted to criticise their own government, Carr's willingness to lambast Australia's government and applaud China's has made him a media darling. If freedom of speech is at issue, then the things Carr says in China deserve to be aired more widely in Australia. Fundamental issues are indeed at stake.
- Within Australia Carr is now known for speaking up on Beijing's behalf and talking down criticism of China as a relic of Cold War thinking. There are many possible triggers for this. Examples would be infrastructure purchases, extradition treaties, university issues, political donations, media coverage and allegations of foreign interference, all topics on which Carr has taken to the airwaves or the print media. The pattern is consistent, with Carr denying problems on the Chinese side while simultaneously criticising Australians who see problems, on the other.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@wothin You said "“you consider not all Uyghurs are affected, but only the ones who appear "too religious". Besides, China only majorly discriminates against Uyghurs not other Muslim groups, Hui people are also muslim and have a population of roughly 10 million.”"
Not true at all. All muslims in Xijiang be it Uzbeks, Khazaks, Uyghurs, or even Hui are subject to the camps. And it's not just extremist or 'too religious' types, they are sending people simply for having long beards, wearing certain Muslim clothing, quitting smoking or drinking, praying somewhere outside of the mosque, etc. These are standard Muslim stuff. But I'm starting to think I'm debating a CCP shill.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@agapp11able WUMAO, ASPI has a great article on how China often tries to lie and use propaganda videos which wumaos like you then use to say "see, no detention facility of Uyghurs!". And you have literally just done -- you posted a CCP news video as your source with much of the same practices. Article:
- Last month, Global Times editor Hu Xijin visited what he referred to as a ‘vocational training center’ in Kashgar. He posted a two-minute video of the trip on his Twitter account
- But by July 2017, when construction was complete, every ‘school’ building in the southwest of the facility (previously Middle School No. 5) was surrounded by tall fencing that had been painted green and topped with razor wire. By August, much of School No. 6 was enclosed with similar fencing. Upon completion in around November 2017, School No. 4 was also highly securitised and a tender was released calling for bidders to oversee and install new equipment, including a new surveillance camera system
- The video posted by Hu Xijin of Middle School No. 4 on 24 October shows detainees dancing and playing table-tennis and basketball. However, this visit—and the footage shared on social media—may not reflect the regular daily experiences of the detainees.
- Through satellite and imagery analysis—including imagery updated daily—we can determine that these courts are coloured mats that are recent additions to the camp. The mats were placed on a concrete-covered area that is normally bare and appears inaccessible to detainees. - Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October
- Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October
1
-
@agapp11able @agapp11able Bascially, these are the points:
1. You only trust the CCP and will not accept anything from any western country be it an humanatarian orginization or legit news org. However, you will accept anything that is from China or supports China.
2.. Aspi identified likely camps and you said they are just schools and drug rehab facilities. You have refused to actually provide a source.. You just consistently saying there are didn’t make it true. Give a source
3. You pointed to the Pichan Facility #4 and said that it's not a detenton facility simply for being near apartments even though the CCP has allowed BBC to visit a low security camp and it was near apartment buildings. In the same video, the bbc attempted to go to another facility in town which was also near apartments but the CCP officials kicked out the BBC from the area and stopped them from filming.
4. ASPI said they identified 380+ very likely facilities. You have only been able to directly point to one and your assumptions on it are wrong (see #3) but yet even if that wasn't a camp, you believe that if you find one facility they were wrong with it means they are wrong with all the remaining 380ish. ASPI has two ratings – ‘likely’ and ‘confirmed’. Even if one or two are wrong, it does not mean that most of the rest are wrong. If they were, why don’t you have evidence on all 380 but instead try to claim about 3 or 4 are wrong?
5. . Asked to make major criticism of the CCP that the CCP hasn’t already acknowledged --- All you did was say “they banned private tutors and healthcare isn’t universal”. You are unable to Give a serious criticism
6. Lied that I said that all 12 million Muslims in Xinjiang were sent to the camps. Me saying 12 million Muslims in Xinjiang doesn’t mean I’m saying all 12 million are or were in camps.
7. Said that Corporations never lie that they use forced labor or sweat shop labor and also argued that since Skechers said their two facilities in China didn't have forced labor, it means China doesn't have any forced labor.
8. Lied and that ASPI had said that there are two million in the camps at this exact moment. Unable to provide a source.
9. Lied that Amnesty International with funded by the CIA with CIA money. It was actually founded by Peter Benenson and Eric Baker and it does not accept donations from governments or governmental organizations.
10. Lied that ASPI funding from Australian governments is only 37%.
11. You literally used CCP 100% controlled news as your sources while you reject anything from the west for whatever reason you can think of.
12. You said that Marlabashi Detention center no 1 was in fact a school. Because the Chinese state media source you used cut to a classroom that could be located anywhere. If it was just a school, there would be tons of videos of the school being a school. Kids getting out of class, playing inside those walls, etc. But you won’t provide any such video and just belive the CCP when they say the classroom they showed was indeed inside the facility.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@agapp11able WUMAO, ASPI has a great article on how China often tries to lie and use propaganda videos which wumaos like you then use to say "see, no detention facility of Uyghurs!"
- Last month, Global Times editor Hu Xijin visited what he referred to as a ‘vocational training center’ in Kashgar. He posted a two-minute video of the trip on his Twitter account
- But by July 2017, when construction was complete, every ‘school’ building in the southwest of the facility (previously Middle School No. 5) was surrounded by tall fencing that had been painted green and topped with razor wire. By August, much of School No. 6 was enclosed with similar fencing. Upon completion in around November 2017, School No. 4 was also highly securitised and a tender was released calling for bidders to oversee and install new equipment, including a new surveillance camera system
- The video posted by Hu Xijin of Middle School No. 4 on 24 October shows detainees dancing and playing table-tennis and basketball. However, this visit—and the footage shared on social media—may not reflect the regular daily experiences of the detainees.
- Through satellite and imagery analysis—including imagery updated daily—we can determine that these courts are coloured mats that are recent additions to the camp. The mats were placed on a concrete-covered area that is normally bare and appears inaccessible to detainees. - Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October
- Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October
1
-
1
-
@zer0hero95 WUMAO, ASPI has a great article on how China often tries to lie and use propaganda videos which wumaos like you then use to say "see, no detention facility of Uyghurs!"
- Last month, Global Times editor Hu Xijin visited what he referred to as a ‘vocational training center’ in Kashgar. He posted a two-minute video of the trip on his Twitter account
- But by July 2017, when construction was complete, every ‘school’ building in the southwest of the facility (previously Middle School No. 5) was surrounded by tall fencing that had been painted green and topped with razor wire. By August, much of School No. 6 was enclosed with similar fencing. Upon completion in around November 2017, School No. 4 was also highly securitised and a tender was released calling for bidders to oversee and install new equipment, including a new surveillance camera system
- The video posted by Hu Xijin of Middle School No. 4 on 24 October shows detainees dancing and playing table-tennis and basketball. However, this visit—and the footage shared on social media—may not reflect the regular daily experiences of the detainees.
- Through satellite and imagery analysis—including imagery updated daily—we can determine that these courts are coloured mats that are recent additions to the camp. The mats were placed on a concrete-covered area that is normally bare and appears inaccessible to detainees. - Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October
- Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@agapp11able Wumao, in case you didn't see my response:
- "If they're incompetent, then how do we know that they're right about the rest of the facilities?"
You identified 4 facilities and used CCP state media or random people online who only defend the CCP on their twitter accounts. In a couple of instances, the source is literally just the CCP saying it's not what ASPI claims. In another, they have a video of a classroom that can be anywhere and you accept it as evidence but yet won't say how you can even tell that classroom is in the facility.
QUESTION: WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE THE CLASSROOM IS IN THE SAME BUILDING AS ASPI IDENTIFIED FACILITIY? WHY WON'T YOU PROVIDE OTHER VIDEOS OF THE KIDS PLAYING OUTISIDE IN THE FACILITY OR EVEN JUST GOING IN AND OUT OF THE BUILDING?
- ""Where's your serious criticism of the USA? Why did you ignore previous requests?"
I gave you lots of criticism from racism in the US both systemic and individual, bad safety nets for the poor, no universal healthcare, corrupt and immorale presidents. You have "I dislike China's ban on private tutoring" LOL, typical wumao.
Q: WHY DO YOU REFUSE TO MAKE ANY SERIOUS CRTICISM OF CHINA? YOU A WUMAO?
- ""So do you admit then that ASPI is funded by the military of both Australia and the USA? Yes or no?""
ASPI makes their funding very clear unlike your CCP sources. I already gave you the breakdown earlier -- 70% comes from Australia itself and 80% comes from Australia plus private non-government non-defense contractor.
Q: WHY DO YOU ACCEPT PROPOGANDA NEWS OUTLET RUN BY THE VERY SAME GOVERNMENT ACCUSSED?
- ""Do you admit that many Chinese middle and high schools are boarding schools and have kids live in them. Yes or no?""
I never said they didn't. But you're saying that it's common for boarding schools for MIDDLE SCHOOL to have 10,000+ students and prison walls.
Q: GIVE A SOURCE THAT 10,000+ STUDENTS AND PRISON WALLS ARE TYPICAL OF MIDDLE SCHOOL BOARDING SCHOOLS.
Q: DO YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT CHINA CREATES PROPOGANDA VIDEOS? IF NOT, PROVE TO ME THE SOLID EVIDENCE ASPI PROVIDED ISN'T CHINA CREATING PROPOGANDA VIDEO?
GO AHEAD, ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS. YOU WON'T BECAUSE YOU ARE A WUMAO.
1
-
@agapp11able Wumao, in case you didn't see my response:
- "If they're incompetent, then how do we know that they're right about the rest of the facilities?"
You identified 4 facilities and used CCP state media or random people online who only defend the CCP on their twitter accounts. In a couple of instances, the source is literally just the CCP saying it's not what ASPI claims. In another, they have a video of a classroom that can be anywhere and you accept it as evidence but yet won't say how you can even tell that classroom is in the facility.
QUESTION: WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE THE CLASSROOM IS IN THE SAME BUILDING AS ASPI IDENTIFIED FACILITIY? WHY WON'T YOU PROVIDE OTHER VIDEOS OF THE KIDS PLAYING OUTISIDE IN THE FACILITY OR EVEN JUST GOING IN AND OUT OF THE BUILDING?
- ""Where's your serious criticism of the USA? Why did you ignore previous requests?"
I gave you lots of criticism from racism in the US both systemic and individual, bad safety nets for the poor, no universal healthcare, corrupt and immorale presidents. You have "I dislike China's ban on private tutoring" LOL, typical wumao.
Q: WHY DO YOU REFUSE TO MAKE ANY SERIOUS CRTICISM OF CHINA? YOU A WUMAO?
- ""So do you admit then that ASPI is funded by the military of both Australia and the USA? Yes or no?""
ASPI makes their funding very clear unlike your CCP sources. I already gave you the breakdown earlier -- 70% comes from Australia itself and 80% comes from Australia plus private non-government non-defense contractor.
Q: WHY DO YOU ACCEPT PROPOGANDA NEWS OUTLET RUN BY THE VERY SAME GOVERNMENT ACCUSSED?
- ""Do you admit that many Chinese middle and high schools are boarding schools and have kids live in them. Yes or no?""
I never said they didn't. But you're saying that it's common for boarding schools for MIDDLE SCHOOL to have 10,000+ students and prison walls.
Q: GIVE A SOURCE THAT 10,000+ STUDENTS AND PRISON WALLS ARE TYPICAL OF MIDDLE SCHOOL BOARDING SCHOOLS.
Q: DO YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT CHINA CREATES PROPOGANDA VIDEOS? IF NOT, PROVE TO ME THE SOLID EVIDENCE ASPI PROVIDED ISN'T CHINA CREATING PROPOGANDA VIDEO?
GO AHEAD, ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS. YOU WON'T BECAUSE YOU ARE A WUMAO.
1
-
@agapp11able
Wumao, in case you didn't see my response:
- "If they're incompetent, then how do we know that they're right about the rest of the facilities?"
You identified 4 facilities and used CCP state media or random people online who only defend the CCP on their twitter accounts. In a couple of instances, the source is literally just the CCP saying it's not what ASPI claims. In another, they have a video of a classroom that can be anywhere and you accept it as evidence but yet won't say how you can even tell that classroom is in the facility.
QUESTION: WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE THE CLASSROOM IS IN THE SAME BUILDING AS ASPI IDENTIFIED FACILITIY? WHY WON'T YOU PROVIDE OTHER VIDEOS OF THE KIDS PLAYING OUTISIDE IN THE FACILITY OR EVEN JUST GOING IN AND OUT OF THE BUILDING?
- ""Where's your serious criticism of the USA? Why did you ignore previous requests?"
I gave you lots of criticism from racism in the US both systemic and individual, bad safety nets for the poor, no universal healthcare, corrupt and immorale presidents. You have "I dislike China's ban on private tutoring" LOL, typical wumao.
Q: WHY DO YOU REFUSE TO MAKE ANY SERIOUS CRTICISM OF CHINA? YOU A WUMAO?
- ""So do you admit then that ASPI is funded by the military of both Australia and the USA? Yes or no?""
ASPI makes their funding very clear unlike your CCP sources. I already gave you the breakdown earlier -- 70% comes from Australia itself and 80% comes from Australia plus private non-government non-defense contractor.
Q: WHY DO YOU ACCEPT PROPOGANDA NEWS OUTLET RUN BY THE VERY SAME GOVERNMENT ACCUSSED?
- ""Do you admit that many Chinese middle and high schools are boarding schools and have kids live in them. Yes or no?""
I never said they didn't. But you're saying that it's common for boarding schools for MIDDLE SCHOOL to have 10,000+ students and prison walls.
Q: GIVE A SOURCE THAT 10,000+ STUDENTS AND PRISON WALLS ARE TYPICAL OF MIDDLE SCHOOL BOARDING SCHOOLS.
GO AHEAD, ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS. YOU WON'T BECAUSE YOU ARE A WUMAO.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@agapp11able and the source that shows CCP staging videos is "Mapping Xinjiang’s ‘re-education’ camps" from "ASPI". Google that and it should be top result or just copy & paste paragraphs from below. Below is highlighted text:
WUMAO, ASPI has a great article on how China often tries to lie and use propaganda videos which wumaos like you then use to say "see, no detention facility of Uyghurs!"
- Last month, Global Times editor Hu Xijin visited what he referred to as a ‘vocational training center’ in Kashgar. He posted a two-minute video of the trip on his Twitter account
- But by July 2017, when construction was complete, every ‘school’ building in the southwest of the facility (previously Middle School No. 5) was surrounded by tall fencing that had been painted green and topped with razor wire. By August, much of School No. 6 was enclosed with similar fencing. Upon completion in around November 2017, School No. 4 was also highly securitised and a tender was released calling for bidders to oversee and install new equipment, including a new surveillance camera system
- The video posted by Hu Xijin of Middle School No. 4 on 24 October shows detainees dancing and playing table-tennis and basketball. However, this visit—and the footage shared on social media—may not reflect the regular daily experiences of the detainees.
- Through satellite and imagery analysis—including imagery updated daily—we can determine that these courts are coloured mats that are recent additions to the camp. The mats were placed on a concrete-covered area that is normally bare and appears inaccessible to detainees. - Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October
- Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@agapp11able WHY DO YOU REFUSE TO POINT OUT WHERE ASPI LIED IN ITS ARTICLE WITH EVIDENCE OF CHINA STAGING VIDEOS?
WUMAO, ASPI has a great article on how China often tries to lie and use propaganda videos which wumaos like you then use to say "see, no detention facility of Uyghurs!".
- Last month, Global Times editor Hu Xijin visited what he referred to as a ‘vocational training center’ in Kashgar. He posted a two-minute video of the trip on his Twitter account
- But by July 2017, when construction was complete, every ‘school’ building in the southwest of the facility (previously Middle School No. 5) was surrounded by tall fencing that had been painted green and topped with razor wire. By August, much of School No. 6 was enclosed with similar fencing. Upon completion in around November 2017, School No. 4 was also highly securitised and a tender was released calling for bidders to oversee and install new equipment, including a new surveillance camera system
- The video posted by Hu Xijin of Middle School No. 4 on 24 October shows detainees dancing and playing table-tennis and basketball. However, this visit—and the footage shared on social media—may not reflect the regular daily experiences of the detainees.
- Through satellite and imagery analysis—including imagery updated daily—we can determine that these courts are coloured mats that are recent additions to the camp. The mats were placed on a concrete-covered area that is normally bare and appears inaccessible to detainees. - Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October
- Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ArawnOfAnnwn AQ also attacked the US in 1993 world trade center (first time), attack on US base in Saudi Arabia 1995, another attack on US base in Saudi Arabia 1996, a major bombing of US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania 1998, attack on US in Yemen 2000, plus 9/11 and an attempted bombing of US plane in Dec 2001. Also, many attacks on other countries as well including 2002 in Tunisia, 2002 Yemen, 2002 Bali Bombings, 2002 Mombasa attacks, 2003 Ridya compound bombings, 2003 casablanca bombings, 2003 marriot hotel bombing, etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@pepelepew1227 Technically the subsidies are for Foxconn, the actual manufacturer of Iphones. New York Times has an article on it titled "How hidden tax breaks, perks created 'iPhone City' in China". Nikkei Asia has an article "Chinese subsidies for Foxconn and Want Want spark outcry in Taiwan" and describes not only subides by Foxconn, but other Taiwanese companies with shops in China.
Nikkei Asia article describes:
- Foxconn, the Taiwanese Apple supplier whose China-friendly founder is making a bid for the presidency, and media owner Want Want are among major companies from the island receiving hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies from Beijing,
- The grants to these companies, made over several years, amount to a significant portion of net profit generated over the same period; more than half, in the case of one Foxconn subsidiary, 12% for Uni-President China and 11% for Want Want
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nobodyspecial4702 Two studies have confirmed what observers of the Jones Act have known for years — that the century-old federal maritime law has long been harmful to Puerto Rico’s economy.
One of the studies, conducted by John Dunham & Associates, found that the Jones Act has prevented the creation of 13,250 jobs and $1.5 billion in annual economic growth, representing $1.1 billion in higher prices, $337.3 million in wages, and $106.4 million in lost tax revenues.
The other, conducted by Advantage Business Consulting, looked specifically at U.S. territory’s food industry and estimated that the Jones Act equaled a 7.2 percent tax on food and beverages alone, or about $367 million extra for island residents.
“Individually, families pay $300 more or $107 per person for food and beverages,” said ABC economist Vicente Feliciano.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@lc7583 The constitution of Taiwan include mainland China, I guess it belongs to Taiwan?
The rest of your argument is that as long as China keeps saying what it says, whatever China wants China should get.
>The countries divided by war after World War II included Germany, Vietnam, China Korea
Yes, and would support South Korea invading North Korea, China invading Taiwan, and in 1989 West Germany invading East Germany.
>because China is still able to assert its sovereignty
It's sovereignty over the mainland...like Taiwan has over Taiwan. This is an odd comment you made about sovereignty -- you just made an argument to defend Taiwan's sovergnty. Taiwan has it's own government, it's own deals, it's own military, and other governments when wanting to deal with Taiwan don't make deals with China but talk and make deals with Taiwan.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1