Youtube comments of HomerOJSimpson (@Homer-OJ-Simpson).

  1. 1700
  2. 1300
  3. The history of Las Vegas is fascinating. I've been there maybe a dozen times, a few times for pleasure and the rest for work. To think that the old popular part of Vegas was it's downtown by the 1970's or 1980's, the strip became the hot spot while downtown began to die out. The strip even pivoted in the 90's to family friendly only to drop that a few short years later. When I first went to Vegas around 2005, downtown (Freemont Street) was dead and old. Looks nothing like today -- it was mostly seniors and locals. By around 2010 when I next went to Freemont, I saw some changes happening with new hotels plus the light show. It still didn't draw huge crowds like today but on my next trip to Freemont around 2015ish, it was a hot spot. Numerous improvements and modifications. It looked nothing like a decade before. Today, Freemont St is a must stop even for one day if you're visiting the strip. The light show is a great fun experience, there are at least 3 stages playing live music and sometimes even famous acts. I saw Shaggy perform for an hour for free with thousands of people watching. Step away from downtown or the strip, and you have some areas serving great food. To the west of the strip is a huge area of great Asian food -- Chinese, Japanese and Korean. There are also great Mexican restaurants throughout the city. And from Vegas you can go to the lowest spot in the Americas which is the hottest place in the world -- Death Valley. Hoover Dam is a very popular half day trip for tourists and it's a must do. Or hit the mountains nearby, especially the beatiful Valley of Fire park.
    1100
  4. 772
  5. 594
  6. 552
  7. 532
  8. 491
  9. 490
  10. 403
  11. 390
  12. 358
  13. 314
  14. 309
  15. 298
  16. 272
  17. 262
  18. 250
  19. 248
  20. 246
  21. 215
  22. 191
  23. 182
  24. 180
  25. 179
  26. 174
  27. 173
  28. 172
  29. 166
  30. 164
  31. 159
  32. 158
  33. 158
  34. 155
  35. 151
  36. 148
  37. 146
  38. 145
  39. 136
  40. 124
  41. 121
  42. 120
  43. 119
  44. 119
  45. 119
  46. 119
  47. 117
  48. 109
  49. 109
  50. 105
  51. 102
  52. 101
  53. 101
  54. 99
  55. 98
  56. 94
  57. 94
  58. 93
  59. 93
  60. 90
  61. 88
  62. 88
  63. 88
  64. 88
  65. 86
  66. 85
  67. 81
  68. 78
  69. 78
  70. 77
  71. 74
  72. 73
  73. 70
  74. 70
  75. 69
  76. 69
  77. 68
  78. 68
  79. 68
  80. 67
  81. 67
  82. 66
  83. 65
  84. 64
  85. 64
  86. 61
  87. 60
  88. 57
  89. 56
  90. 56
  91. 55
  92. 55
  93. 54
  94. 54
  95. 54
  96. 53
  97. 53
  98. 53
  99. 53
  100. 52
  101. 52
  102. 52
  103. 50
  104. 50
  105. 49
  106. 49
  107. 48
  108. 48
  109. 46
  110. 46
  111. 46
  112. 46
  113. 46
  114. 46
  115. 45
  116. 45
  117. 45
  118. 45
  119. 45
  120. 45
  121. 44
  122. 44
  123. 43
  124. 43
  125. 43
  126. 42
  127. 42
  128. 42
  129. 41
  130. 41
  131. 41
  132. 39
  133. 39
  134. 39
  135. 39
  136. 38
  137. 38
  138. 38
  139. 38
  140. 38
  141. 37
  142. 37
  143. 37
  144. 37
  145. 37
  146. 37
  147. 37
  148. 37
  149. 37
  150. 36
  151. 36
  152. 36
  153. 35
  154. 35
  155. 35
  156. 35
  157. 34
  158. 34
  159. 34
  160. 34
  161. 33
  162. 33
  163. 33
  164. 33
  165. 33
  166. 32
  167. 32
  168. 32
  169. 32
  170. 32
  171. 32
  172. 32
  173. 32
  174. 31
  175. 31
  176. 31
  177. 31
  178. 31
  179. 31
  180. 31
  181. 30
  182. 30
  183. 30
  184. 30
  185. 29
  186. 29
  187. 29
  188. 29
  189. 29
  190. 29
  191. 28
  192. 28
  193. 28
  194. 28
  195. 28
  196. 28
  197. 28
  198. 28
  199. 28
  200. 28
  201. 27
  202. 27
  203. 27
  204. 27
  205. 27
  206. 27
  207. 27
  208. 26
  209. 26
  210. 26
  211. 26
  212. 26
  213. 26
  214. 26
  215. 25
  216. 25
  217. 25
  218. 25
  219. 25
  220. 25
  221. 25
  222. 25
  223. 25
  224. 25
  225. 25
  226. 24
  227. 24
  228. 24
  229. 24
  230. Great video! I'm glad I found this channel last month. This is one of the most complicated issues and this did a great job of explaining the situation and the background. On one hand, the Jewish Israelis have been under attack by it's neighbors. But on the other hand, there was some movements towards peace in the 90's and 00's which were derailed by a number of actions -- the assassination of the PM in 1995 by far right winger and the settlements expanding into Palestine. This of course caused more backlash from Palestinians and terrorist attacks picked up. Israel responded with more force, walling off much of Palestine, and increased settlements. The issue I see more recently is that West Bank has progressed since the 2000's. Terrorist attacks minimized, more moderate politicians, etc. They made all the right moves towards peace. How did Israel respond? Continued settlements and more human rights abuses. Israel is showing they will no longer consider actual peace. Then you have Gaza Strip. They run by what many consider a terrorist organization that is still using terrorist attacks on Israel. While the West Bank government and people have seemed to do all the right things to increase cooperation with Israel (if Israel ever cared), the Gaza is doing all the wrong things and there are some justifications for some of Israel's actions in Gaza. The fact that there are three players involved and not two is certainly complicating the situation even more. It's clear that the increasing settlements in the west bank are an attempt by Israel to eventually consume all of the west bank. Annexation little by little. So long as Israel continues to built settlements and so long as Hamas is in control of Gaza, there is no chance for any peaceful resolution. In regards to the UN resolution, it's a mixed bag. There are some I expected on one side or the other but rest are just a mix bag. It's interesting to see Russia and China vote in favor of it while they are both committing terrible human rights abuses -- one with even more severe treatment of Muslims and the other with war crimes in Ukraine. Maybe they are hoping to deflect on their human rights abuses but I would have thought they would have abstained.
    24
  231. 24
  232. 24
  233. 24
  234. 24
  235. 24
  236. 24
  237. 24
  238. 23
  239. 23
  240. 23
  241. 23
  242. 23
  243. 22
  244. 22
  245. 22
  246. 22
  247. 22
  248. 22
  249. 22
  250. 22
  251. 22
  252. 22
  253. 22
  254. 21
  255. 21
  256. 21
  257. 21
  258. 21
  259. 21
  260. 21
  261. 20
  262. 20
  263. 20
  264. 20
  265. 20
  266. 20
  267. 20
  268. 20
  269. 20
  270. 20
  271. 19
  272. 19
  273. 19
  274. 19
  275. 19
  276. 19
  277. 19
  278. 19
  279. 19
  280. 19
  281. 19
  282. 19
  283. 19
  284. 19
  285. 19
  286. 19
  287. 19
  288. 19
  289. 19
  290. 19
  291. 18
  292. 18
  293. 18
  294. 18
  295. 18
  296. 18
  297. 18
  298. 18
  299. 18
  300. 18
  301. 18
  302. 18
  303. 18
  304. 18
  305. 18
  306. 18
  307. 18
  308. 18
  309. 17
  310. 17
  311. 17
  312. 17
  313. 17
  314. 17
  315. 17
  316. 17
  317. 17
  318. 17
  319. 17
  320. 17
  321. 17
  322. 17
  323. 17
  324. 17
  325. 17
  326. 17
  327. 17
  328. 17
  329. 17
  330. 17
  331. 16
  332. 16
  333. 16
  334. 16
  335. 16
  336. 16
  337. 16
  338. 16
  339. 16
  340. 16
  341. 16
  342. 16
  343. 16
  344. 16
  345. 15
  346. 15
  347. 15
  348. 15
  349. 15
  350. 15
  351. 15
  352. 15
  353. 15
  354. 15
  355. 15
  356. 15
  357. 15
  358. 15
  359. 15
  360. 15
  361. 15
  362. 15
  363. 15
  364. 15
  365. 15
  366. 15
  367. 15
  368. 15
  369. 15
  370. 15
  371. 14
  372. 14
  373. 14
  374. 14
  375. 14
  376. 14
  377. 14
  378. 14
  379. 14
  380. 14
  381. 14
  382. 14
  383. 14
  384. 14
  385. 14
  386. 14
  387. 14
  388. 14
  389. 14
  390. 14
  391. 14
  392. 14
  393. 14
  394. 14
  395. 14
  396. 14
  397. 14
  398. 14
  399. 14
  400. 14
  401. 13
  402. 13
  403. 13
  404. 13
  405. 13
  406. 13
  407. 13
  408. 13
  409. 13
  410. 13
  411. 13
  412. 13
  413. 13
  414. 13
  415. 13
  416. 13
  417. 13
  418. 13
  419. 13
  420. 13
  421. 13
  422. 13
  423. 13
  424. 13
  425. 13
  426. 13
  427. 13
  428. 13
  429. 13
  430. 13
  431. 13
  432. 12
  433. 12
  434. 12
  435. 12
  436. 12
  437. 12
  438. 12
  439. 12
  440. 12
  441. 12
  442. 12
  443. 12
  444. 12
  445. 12
  446. 12
  447. 12
  448. 12
  449. 12
  450. 12
  451. 12
  452. 12
  453. 12
  454. 12
  455. 12
  456. 12
  457. 12
  458. 12
  459. 12
  460. 12
  461. 12
  462. 12
  463. 12
  464. 12
  465. 12
  466. 12
  467. 12
  468. 12
  469. 12
  470. 12
  471. 12
  472. 12
  473. 12
  474. 11
  475. 11
  476. 11
  477. 11
  478. 11
  479. 11
  480. 11
  481. 11
  482. 11
  483. 11
  484. 11
  485. 11
  486. 11
  487. 11
  488. 11
  489. 11
  490. 11
  491. 11
  492. 11
  493. 11
  494. 11
  495. 11
  496. 11
  497. 11
  498. 11
  499. 11
  500. 11
  501. 11
  502. 11
  503. 11
  504. 11
  505. 11
  506. 11
  507. 11
  508. 11
  509. 11
  510. 11
  511. 11
  512. 11
  513. 11
  514. 11
  515. 11
  516. 11
  517. 11
  518. 11
  519. 11
  520. 11
  521. 11
  522. 10
  523. 10
  524. 10
  525. 10
  526. 10
  527. 10
  528. 10
  529. 10
  530. 10
  531. 10
  532. 10
  533. 10
  534. 10
  535. 10
  536. 10
  537. 10
  538. 10
  539. 10
  540. 10
  541. 10
  542. 10
  543. 10
  544. 10
  545. 10
  546. 10
  547. 10
  548. 10
  549. 10
  550. 10
  551. 10
  552. 10
  553. 10
  554. 10
  555. 10
  556. 10
  557. 10
  558. 10
  559. 10
  560. 10
  561. 10
  562. 10
  563. 10
  564. 10
  565. 10
  566. 10
  567. 10
  568. 10
  569. 10
  570. 10
  571. 10
  572. 10
  573. 10
  574. 10
  575. 10
  576. 10
  577. 10
  578. 10
  579. 10
  580. 10
  581. 10
  582. 10
  583. 10
  584. 9
  585. 9
  586. 9
  587. 9
  588. 9
  589. 9
  590. 9
  591. 9
  592. 9
  593. 9
  594. 9
  595. 9
  596. 9
  597. 9
  598. 9
  599. 9
  600. 9
  601. 9
  602. 9
  603. 9
  604. 9
  605. 9
  606. 9
  607. 9
  608. 9
  609. 9
  610. Great topic and great video. The way I see it, with the new increased power of weapons that Ukraine is receiving (tanks, missile defense systems like Patriot missiles, armored fighting vehicles) will give Ukraine the advantage. Of course, the more land that Russia loses, the more soldiers per area that Russia has which means it will be tough to gain more and more land. The west has been slow to to send new type of weapons -- Certain basic weapons were only sent to Ukraine a month or two after the war started (assumption was likely that Ukraine was going to lose but when Ukraine pushed Russia back from Kyiv, the weapons started flow in). Himars came nearly 5-6 months after the war started and Patriot Missiles and Tanks will likely arrive a year after the war started. But each time Ukraine received a new type of weapon, they make advancements. So long as Ukraine keeps receiving better weapons, they will be at the advantage. Russia does appear willing to lose far more soldiers to each Ukraine casualty and that may lead to short term success (or a draw) but will make the war more unpopular in Russia over time. I see two outcomes so long as Ukraine keeps receiving support from the west. And these outcomes are at least in 2025 or later. I don't see the war ending in 2023 or 2024, so long as Putin is alive. 1. Ukraine is at an advantage and has regained much of or all of what it lost or all that it lost since Feb 2022 but the remaining lands are too costly to gain back and are areas now that are dominated by pro-Russian. In this situation, Ukraine will negotiate but will require likely that most or all the natural resources (gas, oil) belong to Ukraine and that those territories can only be allowed limited Russian soldiers. In addition, so long as Ukraine has the advantage when negotiations happen, I expect Ukraine will also get some financial compensation from Russia. 2. Ukraine has all it's territories back. This is a low possibility while Putin is alive because he will just throw more soldiers to the meat grinder without care. That could be enough to stall the war for a long time. So with a deceased Putin, it's possible a new government would support negotiations that at a minimum return the Donbas region to Ukraine. Crimea, I'm not sure. In this scenario, the new government of Russia will negotiate that Ukraine cannot be part of NATO (Russia needs this only to save face) and Russia will not compensate Ukraine. I think something close to scenario 1 will happen. It's also possible if Ukraine is able to take Crimea back and not the Donbas and the description in scenario 1 will what Ukraine gets for only allowing the Russian controlled territories in the Donbas to become part of Russia.
    9
  611. 9
  612. 9
  613. 9
  614. 9
  615. 9
  616. 9
  617. 9
  618. 9
  619. 9
  620. 9
  621. 9
  622. 9
  623. 9
  624. 9
  625. 9
  626. 9
  627. 9
  628. 9
  629. 9
  630. 9
  631. 9
  632. 9
  633. 9
  634. 9
  635. 9
  636. 9
  637. 9
  638. 9
  639. 9
  640. 9
  641. 9
  642. 9
  643. 9
  644. 9
  645. 9
  646. 9
  647. 9
  648. 9
  649. 9
  650. 9
  651. 9
  652. 9
  653. 9
  654. 9
  655. 9
  656. 9
  657. 9
  658. 9
  659. 9
  660. 9
  661. 9
  662. 9
  663. 8
  664. 8
  665. 8
  666. 8
  667. 8
  668. 8
  669. 8
  670. 8
  671. 8
  672. 8
  673. 8
  674. 8
  675. 8
  676. 8
  677. 8
  678. 8
  679. 8
  680. 8
  681. 8
  682. 8
  683. 8
  684. 8
  685. 8
  686. 8
  687. 8
  688. 8
  689. 8
  690. 8
  691. 8
  692. 8
  693. 8
  694. 8
  695. 8
  696. 8
  697. 8
  698. 8
  699. 8
  700. 8
  701. 8
  702. 8
  703. 8
  704. 8
  705. 8
  706. 8
  707. 8
  708. 8
  709. 8
  710. 8
  711. 8
  712. 8
  713. 8
  714. 8
  715. 8
  716. 8
  717. 8
  718. 8
  719. 8
  720. 8
  721. 8
  722. 8
  723. 8
  724. 8
  725. 8
  726. 8
  727. 8
  728. 8
  729. 8
  730. 8
  731. 8
  732. 8
  733. 8
  734. 8
  735. 8
  736. 8
  737. 8
  738. 8
  739. 8
  740. 8
  741. 8
  742. 8
  743. 8
  744. 8
  745. 8
  746. 8
  747. 8
  748. 8
  749. 8
  750. 8
  751. 8
  752. I'm glad you aren't doing as many 'doomsday' geopolitical issues lately and returning to the old ways. This was a fascinating video and I've been intrigued with Hawaii since I first visited about 5 years ago. I've done 2 trips and visited all 4 of the major visited islands. They are all so unique in their own way. 1. Oahu: The only island with a big city and a nice city at that (Honolulu). Great beaches. Some great views of the small mountains and lots of interesting little towns. Expensive and small though. Also lacking a large mountain or canyon. 2. Big Island. Complete opposite of Oahu. Beaches aren't good or just okay at best and it has no big city with Hilo & Kailua-Kona being only mid size towns (40k & 20k) but boring. However, it has the best 'other'. It has 2 huge mountains with one you can go to the top at over 13k above sea elevation. it's really cold up there. They have some amazing canyons, great active lava fields to view, and amazing world class snorkeling/scuba spots. IIIRC, one of 2 places in the world where the giant manta ray is common/predictable making for a great snorkling / scuba experience. 3. Maui: The Best beaches. No big city and mid size town is a bit boring but still better than the towns of Big Island. Road to Hana overrated (can't see much on the road other than trees) but the mountain at 10k provides some great views of the island and the valley down below. Do not recall any beautiful canyons 4. Kauai: Again, no big city. Maybe the most interesting town outside of Oahu though but almost no one else outside of that one town. The best canyons by far if you take a helicopter tour. Some great views as well if you go up the mountain -- canyons, valleys, etc. Beaches not as good as Maui or even Oahu but still very good and much better than beaches on Big Island.
    8
  753. 8
  754. 8
  755. 8
  756. 8
  757. 8
  758. 8
  759. 8
  760. 8
  761. 8
  762. 8
  763. 8
  764. 8
  765. 8
  766. 8
  767. 7
  768. 7
  769. 7
  770. 7
  771. 7
  772. 7
  773. 7
  774. 7
  775. 7
  776. 7
  777. 7
  778. 7
  779. 7
  780. 7
  781. 7
  782. 7
  783. 7
  784. 7
  785. 7
  786. 7
  787. 7
  788. 7
  789. 7
  790. 7
  791. 7
  792. 7
  793. 7
  794. 7
  795. 7
  796. 7
  797. 7
  798. 7
  799. 7
  800. 7
  801. 7
  802. 7
  803. 7
  804. 7
  805. 7
  806. 7
  807. 7
  808. 7
  809. 7
  810. 7
  811. 7
  812. 7
  813. 7
  814. 7
  815. 7
  816. 7
  817. 7
  818. 7
  819. 7
  820. 7
  821. 7
  822. 7
  823. 7
  824. 7
  825. 7
  826. 7
  827. 7
  828. 7
  829. 7
  830. 7
  831. 7
  832. 7
  833. 7
  834. 7
  835. 7
  836. 7
  837. 7
  838. 7
  839. 7
  840. 7
  841. 7
  842. 7
  843. 7
  844. 7
  845. 7
  846. 7
  847. 7
  848. 7
  849. 7
  850. 7
  851. 7
  852. 7
  853. 7
  854. 7
  855. 7
  856. 7
  857. 7
  858. 7
  859. 7
  860. 7
  861. 7
  862. 7
  863. 7
  864. 7
  865. 7
  866. 7
  867. 7
  868. 7
  869. 7
  870. 7
  871. 7
  872. 7
  873. 7
  874. 7
  875. 7
  876. 7
  877. 7
  878. 7
  879. 7
  880. 7
  881. 7
  882. 7
  883. 7
  884. 7
  885. 7
  886. 7
  887. 7
  888. 7
  889. 7
  890. 7
  891. 7
  892. 7
  893. 7
  894. 7
  895. 7
  896. 7
  897. 7
  898. 7
  899. 7
  900. 7
  901. 7
  902. 7
  903. 7
  904. 7
  905. 7
  906. 7
  907. 7
  908. 7
  909. 7
  910. 7
  911. Great that you put it all in one video. I've seen these videos in their original release and you did a great job. What's great about Mexico is how many different things it offers that you could spend a long time in Mexico as a tourist and still not see enough. 1. Everyone knows the beaches. Riviera Maya has to be the most popular beach destination in the Americas. Cancun to Tulum and over to Cozumel there are beautiful beaches, world famous scuba diving sites, luxury hotels, affordable hotels, great party scene, great relaxing hotels or areas, etc. If you're over than 25 years old, Playa Del Carmen might be the best in that region. Riviera Maya is also near some beautiful Mayan pyramids and other structures. Some are right there on the beach like Tulum but a must is going a little inland to Chichen Itza! Some people think it’s just Chichen Itza but that pyramid is part of a larger ancient city with many structures still visible. It certainly does rival the Pyramid of Giza. 2. Other beaches. On the west coast you also have some very good beaches with actual older cities that have their traditions. Riviera Maya is mostly new cities and towns and you don’t get as much of the Mexico culture but on the west coast, you have access to some culture and city. Puerto Vallarta and Mazatlan offer good beaches with beautiful cities/towns nearby. There are more quiet and more beautiful places up and down the coast as well. Or for some higher end fun, Cabo in Baja California is a great place as well. 3. Big cities with lots to see and do. Mexico City is probably the top choice as it’s arguably the biggest city in the Americas, has great food, lots to do, and interesting communities. You also can see many Archaeological Sites in and near Mexico City including the pyramid of Teotihuacan. Another major city with lots to see and do is Guadalajara. Guadalajara is near where Tequila is made so you have an option to visit some tequila distilleries. Some say the food is even better in Guadalajara than in Mexico City. 4. Smaller more traditional towns with lots of charm. These are cities/towns that many people think of when they picture a traditional Mexican town. The best IMO is the city of Guanajuato. It’s maybe 300k people but their historic area is in valley with beautiful views of the hills/mountains surrounding it and the beautiful colored homes that were the inspiration of the town in Coco from Pixar. San Miguel de Allende nearby is very similar but a bit more influence by the American/Canadian expat community there. Oaxaca city is a cross between a larger city and a traditional town – it has the charm of Guanajuato, lots of older architecture, big influence from indigenous people and culture, and has the best food in the country. All that while having a larger population of 700k. Crime is certainly an issue in some regions but it’s usually in areas that American tourist aren’t visiting much. Cities closer to or on the US border and communities high in the mountains is generally where much of the violence is at.
    7
  912. 7
  913. 7
  914. 7
  915. 7
  916. 7
  917. 7
  918. 7
  919. 7
  920. 6
  921. 6
  922. 6
  923. 6
  924. 6
  925. 6
  926. 6
  927. 6
  928. 6
  929. 6
  930. 6
  931. 6
  932. 6
  933. 6
  934. 6
  935. 6
  936. 6
  937. 6
  938. 6
  939. 6
  940. 6
  941. 6
  942. 6
  943. 6
  944. 6
  945. 6
  946. 6
  947. 6
  948. 6
  949. 6
  950. 6
  951. 6
  952. 6
  953. 6
  954. 6
  955. 6
  956. 6
  957. 6
  958. 6
  959. 6
  960. 6
  961. 6
  962. 6
  963. 6
  964. 6
  965. 6
  966. 6
  967. 6
  968. 6
  969. 6
  970. 6
  971. 6
  972. 6
  973. 6
  974. 6
  975. 6
  976. 6
  977. 6
  978. 6
  979. 6
  980. 6
  981. 6
  982. 6
  983. 6
  984. 6
  985. 6
  986. 6
  987. 6
  988. 6
  989. 6
  990. 6
  991. 6
  992. 6
  993. 6
  994. 6
  995. 6
  996. 6
  997. 6
  998. 6
  999. 6
  1000. 6
  1001. 6
  1002. 6
  1003. 6
  1004. 6
  1005. 6
  1006. 6
  1007. 6
  1008.  @realname4401  you’re stating inaccurate things to defend China and yet you have issues that quoted stats from research and from respectable YouTuber channels like the economist at Money and Macro? And the Chinese gdp numbers are inflated and some estimates do argue the true gdp is less than 50% of official numbers. I did state it was a hard fact that’s why I literally gave you the official numbers from your CCP and the extreme end of the estimate. Or what about the NBER (national Bureau of economic research) saying that their research indicates chinas annual gdp growth is exaggerated 1.8% pts between 2010-2016? So let’s say it was 1.8% pts a year inflated from 1980 to 2020. Assuming official reported annual growth was 10% but the estimate is saying 8.2%, after 40 years the estimated gdp would be about 50% of the Chinaofficial numbers. And the research I was pointing to when saying the estimate might be as low as 40% of reported was from the university of Chicago using night time lighting. The study didn’t focus on China but found “The results suggest that autocracies overstate yearly GDP growth by approximately 35%.” And found China to be the second worse between what their data shows and what is reported…only Myanamar was worse. In addition, Chinas government has admitted the gdp figures china reports is man made. from Reuters a few years ago: - China’s GDP figures are “man-made” and therefore unreliable, the man who is expected to be the country’s next head of government said in 2007, according to U.S. diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks.
    6
  1009. 6
  1010. 6
  1011. 6
  1012. 6
  1013. 6
  1014. 6
  1015. 6
  1016. 6
  1017. 6
  1018. 6
  1019. 6
  1020. 6
  1021. 6
  1022. 6
  1023. 6
  1024. 6
  1025. 6
  1026. 6
  1027. 6
  1028. 6
  1029. 6
  1030. 6
  1031. 6
  1032. 6
  1033. 6
  1034. 6
  1035. 6
  1036. 6
  1037. 6
  1038. 6
  1039. 6
  1040. 6
  1041. 6
  1042. 6
  1043. 6
  1044. 6
  1045. 6
  1046. 6
  1047. 6
  1048. 6
  1049. 6
  1050. 6
  1051. 6
  1052. 6
  1053. 6
  1054. 6
  1055. 6
  1056. 6
  1057. 6
  1058. 6
  1059. 6
  1060. 6
  1061. 6
  1062. 6
  1063. 6
  1064. 6
  1065. 6
  1066. 6
  1067. 6
  1068. 6
  1069. 6
  1070. 6
  1071. 6
  1072. 6
  1073. 6
  1074. 6
  1075. 6
  1076. 6
  1077. 6
  1078. 6
  1079. 6
  1080. 6
  1081. 6
  1082. 6
  1083. 6
  1084. 6
  1085. 6
  1086. 6
  1087. 6
  1088. 6
  1089. 6
  1090. 6
  1091. 6
  1092. 6
  1093. 6
  1094. 6
  1095. 6
  1096. 6
  1097. 6
  1098. 6
  1099. 6
  1100. 6
  1101. 6
  1102. 6
  1103. 6
  1104. 6
  1105. 6
  1106.  @thisiscarl7622  China has the ability to take all the South China Sea TODAY. Not 10 years nor 20 years ago nor 100 years nor 200 years ago. But the US with it's allies has an even bigger capability to do that. And China doesn't do it because there would be huge negative consequences to China from huge sanctions to possibly military action against them. They will also be seen even worse than Russia and people will greatly reduce their purchase of anything that benefits China. Regarding your comment about status quo, what China is doing is anything but the status quo -- it's aggressive policy which is why almost everyone in that region dislikes China and all are only worried about China. "In my opinion, maintaining the status quo is the best outcome for small countries to maintain peace. Countries like the Philippines, the more they provoke, the more they lose" And your argument that Philippines bringing this to the international courts is somehow a defense for what China is doing in retaliation is a joke. You are basically repeating CCP talking points that China gets what it wants regardless of what the international law says and regardless if China has any real claim while also saying China is then justify to do whatever it takes to get what it wants. What is your answer to why everyone in that region dislikes China and is only truly worried about China? You claim the Philippines shouldn't defend themselves and by bringing in more US forces for defense and going to the international courts, you blame them all while China is the one stealing and threatening to attack others. Sound very much like Putin apologist. Everyone in that region is afraid of Russia & Putin not recognizing their sovereignty and afraid of being invaded which Russia has shown they will do that - then when they seek protection, you justify Russia invading them.
    6
  1107.  @thisiscarl7622  - " I think the best result for both the Philippines and China is to put aside justice and pursue joint development," How can they when China continues to build islands and place military on those artificial islands and then tries to keep ships and planes from the area? Sounds a lot like you are trying your hardest to defend China stealing the South China Sea and then saying all parties should come together and work on a peaceful solution - “which is also the policy pursued by former Philippine President Duterte.” And yet during Duterte’s presidency China encroached on Phillipine territory. Duterte only pretended to not be bothered later so he can get more out of the US. - “In the past five years, there has been no friction or displeasure between China and the Philippines” Did you forget in May 2022 that the Philippines had filed a diplomatic protest with China for unilaterally declaring a South China Sea fishing ban, and complained also of harassment and violations of its jurisdiction by Beijing's coast guard? Duterte was still president May and June 2022. And In Dec 2022 The Philippines' Defense Ministry said it would boost its military presence following reports China embarked on fresh land reclamation projects in the South China Sea. - “after the new Philippine President Marcos came to power last year, he actively engaged in military interaction with the United States and leased four military bases to the United States. This is obviously a hostile action against China,” So China building military bases on Spratley Islands and encroaching on Philippines is okay but when Philippines takes actions to defend itself from encroachment by allowing US to use it’s bases that’s somehow wrong? This is exactly what I meant. You defend every terrible thing your (China) government does and when anyone tries to defend themselves from China’s aggression, it’s somehow that other countries fault and not China.
    6
  1108. 6
  1109. 6
  1110. 6
  1111. 6
  1112. 6
  1113. 6
  1114. 6
  1115. 6
  1116. 6
  1117. 6
  1118. 6
  1119. 6
  1120. 6
  1121. 6
  1122. 6
  1123. 6
  1124. 6
  1125. 6
  1126. 6
  1127. 6
  1128. 6
  1129. 6
  1130. 6
  1131. 6
  1132. 6
  1133. 6
  1134. 6
  1135. 6
  1136. 6
  1137. 6
  1138. 6
  1139. 6
  1140. 6
  1141. 6
  1142. 6
  1143. 6
  1144. 6
  1145. 5
  1146. 5
  1147. 5
  1148. 5
  1149. 5
  1150. 5
  1151. 5
  1152. 5
  1153. 5
  1154. 5
  1155. 5
  1156. 5
  1157. 5
  1158. 5
  1159. 5
  1160. 5
  1161. 5
  1162. 5
  1163. 5
  1164. 5
  1165. 5
  1166. 5
  1167. 5
  1168. 5
  1169. 5
  1170. 5
  1171. 5
  1172. 5
  1173. 5
  1174. 5
  1175. 5
  1176. 5
  1177. 5
  1178. 5
  1179. 5
  1180. 5
  1181. 5
  1182. 5
  1183. 5
  1184. 5
  1185. 5
  1186. 5
  1187. 5
  1188. 5
  1189. 5
  1190. 5
  1191. 5
  1192. 5
  1193. 5
  1194. 5
  1195. 5
  1196. 5
  1197. 5
  1198. 5
  1199. 5
  1200. 5
  1201. 5
  1202. 5
  1203. 5
  1204. 5
  1205. 5
  1206. 5
  1207. 5
  1208. 5
  1209. 5
  1210. 5
  1211. 5
  1212. 5
  1213. 5
  1214. 5
  1215. 5
  1216. 5
  1217. 5
  1218. 5
  1219. 5
  1220. 5
  1221. 5
  1222. 5
  1223. 5
  1224. 5
  1225. 5
  1226. 5
  1227. 5
  1228. 5
  1229. 5
  1230. 5
  1231. 5
  1232. 5
  1233. 5
  1234. 5
  1235. 5
  1236. 5
  1237. 5
  1238. 5
  1239. 5
  1240. 5
  1241. 5
  1242. 5
  1243. 5
  1244. 5
  1245. 5
  1246. 5
  1247. 5
  1248. 5
  1249. 5
  1250. 5
  1251. 5
  1252. 5
  1253. 5
  1254. 5
  1255. 5
  1256. 5
  1257. 5
  1258. 5
  1259. 5
  1260. 5
  1261. 5
  1262. 5
  1263. 5
  1264. 5
  1265. 5
  1266. 5
  1267. 5
  1268. 5
  1269. 5
  1270. 5
  1271. 5
  1272. 5
  1273. 5
  1274. 5
  1275. 5
  1276. 5
  1277. 5
  1278. 5
  1279. 5
  1280. 5
  1281. 5
  1282. 5
  1283. 5
  1284. 5
  1285. 5
  1286. 5
  1287. 5
  1288. 5
  1289. 5
  1290. 5
  1291. 5
  1292. 5
  1293. 5
  1294. 5
  1295. 5
  1296. 5
  1297. 5
  1298. 5
  1299. 5
  1300. 5
  1301. 5
  1302. 5
  1303. 5
  1304. 5
  1305. 5
  1306. 5
  1307. 5
  1308. 5
  1309. 5
  1310. 5
  1311. 5
  1312. 5
  1313. 5
  1314. 5
  1315. 5
  1316. 5
  1317. 5
  1318. 5
  1319. 5
  1320. 5
  1321. 5
  1322. 5
  1323. 5
  1324. 5
  1325. 5
  1326. 5
  1327. 5
  1328. 5
  1329. 5
  1330. 5
  1331. 5
  1332. 5
  1333. 5
  1334. 5
  1335. 5
  1336. 5
  1337. 5
  1338. 5
  1339. 5
  1340. 5
  1341. 5
  1342. 5
  1343. 5
  1344. 5
  1345. 5
  1346. 5
  1347. 5
  1348. 5
  1349. 5
  1350. 5
  1351. 5
  1352. 5
  1353. 5
  1354. 5
  1355. 5
  1356. 5
  1357. 5
  1358. 5
  1359. 5
  1360. 5
  1361. 5
  1362. 5
  1363. 5
  1364. 5
  1365. 5
  1366. 5
  1367. 5
  1368.  @tren133  "Tesla in no way produces 2 million cars a year. At least not yet. " You're right, that's the current capacity. China's plant is 1/3 the total capacity. Tesla opened up a HUGE facility in Texas and another factory in Germany in 2022. In addition, they are in the process of building Gigafactory Mexico for 2024 opening. That means a smaller and smaller share of of what Tesla produces will be from China. The point is you were very misleading with ". The EV value chain inside China is just that much more advanced than anywhere else in the world. Only last year did the US try to enact laws such as the IRA to try to stimulate a EV supply chain inside the US in order to catch up, " The US is part of NAFTA (or whatever the name is now) so a lot of it's productions are across 3 countries. Tesla already had the same capacity in the US as it did in China BEFORE the "IRA to try to stimulate a EV supply chain inside the US in order to catch up". And a big reason Tesla is building in China is because the tens of billions in subsidies they have received. >As for Russia, I'm certain Chinese exports now make up a higher percentage of the market, but that's due more to overall market crashing and western carmakers pulling out rather than Chinese carmakers sending more cars in That's kind of my point. That 600,000 of that increase from 2021 to 2022 was from sanctions on Russia. >Even if the Chinese now hold 50% markeshare inside Russia, that would still only account for a small 5-6% of their total export numbers. I dont have figures on the value by country but in 2022, Russia was about 20-25% of the automobile exports for China. 600k out of about 2.5 million or 3.1 million vehicles. (I'm seeing two different numbers). (edit: 2.5 million is passenger vehicles, 3.1 million include commercial vehicles).
    5
  1369. 5
  1370. 5
  1371. 5
  1372. 5
  1373. 5
  1374. 5
  1375. 5
  1376. 5
  1377. 5
  1378. 5
  1379. 5
  1380.  @bhaashatepe5234  "he US and NATO invasion of Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Yugoslavia .. Afghanistan, Libya, and Yugoslavia had UN support. Syria, it was to defend Kurds and what the US did to defend the Kurds and others was limited -- while Russia was helping Assad who was dropping chemical weapons on civilians. In addition, Russia was doing the same war crimes they do in Ukraine -- they were purposely targeting civilians. Iraq, it's arguably illegal but Iraq had failed on 12 UN resolutions. There were also a large number of countries (Including the Russia you defend) that had stated they might support military intervention if Iraq continues to fail to meet it's obligations. Iraq had also made threats to attack the US to go along with the UN resolutions that were put in place when Iraq used chemical weapons on civilians in Kurdistan. It's obvious you are repeating the Russia talking points I see EVERYWHERE used to defend Russia. But let's compare the above to Russia invading a country (Ukraine) that was not making any threats to Russia. An invasion with the purpose of a landgrab much like the 2014 invasion. And in the process, Russia has committed some of the worst war crimes in a long time -- executing mass number of people, r-aape of adults AND children (have to misspell r--e just in case), etc. Almost every time Russia fights, it's fighting for the bad side. You can argue that the US should not be involved in those conflicts and wars you mentioned, but in every one of those cases the US was either attacked first (Taliban Afghanstan) or they were defending a group against a brutal dictatorship. Russia on the other hand sides with the bad side -- Assad who used chemical weapons on civilians and themselves in a landgrab in Ukraine 2014 and 2022 as well as 2008 Georgia.
    5
  1381. 5
  1382. 5
  1383. 5
  1384. 5
  1385. 5
  1386. 5
  1387. 5
  1388. 5
  1389. 5
  1390. 5
  1391. 5
  1392. 5
  1393. 5
  1394. 5
  1395. 5
  1396. 5
  1397. 5
  1398. 5
  1399. 5
  1400. 5
  1401. 5
  1402. 5
  1403. 5
  1404. 5
  1405. 5
  1406. 5
  1407. 5
  1408. 5
  1409. 5
  1410. 5
  1411. 4
  1412. 4
  1413. 4
  1414. 4
  1415. 4
  1416. 4
  1417. 4
  1418. 4
  1419. 4
  1420. 4
  1421. 4
  1422. 4
  1423. 4
  1424. 4
  1425. 4
  1426. 4
  1427. 4
  1428. 4
  1429. 4
  1430. 4
  1431. 4
  1432. 4
  1433. 4
  1434. 4
  1435. 4
  1436. 4
  1437. 4
  1438. 4
  1439. 4
  1440. 4
  1441. 4
  1442. 4
  1443. 4
  1444. 4
  1445. 4
  1446. 4
  1447. 4
  1448. 4
  1449. 4
  1450. 4
  1451. 4
  1452. 4
  1453. 4
  1454. 4
  1455. 4
  1456. 4
  1457. 4
  1458. 4
  1459. 4
  1460. 4
  1461. 4
  1462. 4
  1463. 4
  1464. 4
  1465. 4
  1466. 4
  1467. 4
  1468. 4
  1469. 4
  1470. 4
  1471. 4
  1472. 4
  1473. 4
  1474. 4
  1475. 4
  1476. 4
  1477. 4
  1478. 4
  1479. 4
  1480. 4
  1481. 4
  1482. 4
  1483. 4
  1484. 4
  1485. 4
  1486. 4
  1487. 4
  1488. 4
  1489. 4
  1490. 4
  1491. 4
  1492. 4
  1493. 4
  1494. 4
  1495. 4
  1496. 4
  1497. 4
  1498. 4
  1499. 4
  1500. 4
  1501. 4
  1502. 4
  1503. 4
  1504. 4
  1505. 4
  1506. 4
  1507. 4
  1508. 4
  1509. 4
  1510. 4
  1511. 4
  1512. 4
  1513. 4
  1514. 4
  1515. 4
  1516. 4
  1517. 4
  1518. 4
  1519. 4
  1520. 4
  1521. 4
  1522. 4
  1523. 4
  1524. 4
  1525. 4
  1526. 4
  1527. 4
  1528. 4
  1529. 4
  1530. 4
  1531. 4
  1532. 4
  1533. 4
  1534. 4
  1535. 4
  1536. 4
  1537. 4
  1538. 4
  1539. 4
  1540. 4
  1541. 4
  1542. 4
  1543. 4
  1544. 4
  1545. 4
  1546. 4
  1547. 4
  1548. 4
  1549. 4
  1550. 4
  1551. 4
  1552. 4
  1553. 4
  1554. 4
  1555. 4
  1556. 4
  1557. 4
  1558. 4
  1559. 4
  1560. 4
  1561. 4
  1562. 4
  1563. 4
  1564. 4
  1565. 4
  1566. 4
  1567. 4
  1568. 4
  1569. 4
  1570. 4
  1571. 4
  1572. 4
  1573. 4
  1574. 4
  1575. 4
  1576. 4
  1577. 4
  1578. 4
  1579. 4
  1580. 4
  1581. 4
  1582. 4
  1583. 4
  1584. 4
  1585. 4
  1586. 4
  1587. 4
  1588. 4
  1589. 4
  1590. 4
  1591. 4
  1592. 4
  1593. 4
  1594. 4
  1595. 4
  1596. 4
  1597. 4
  1598. 4
  1599. 4
  1600. 4
  1601. 4
  1602. 4
  1603. 4
  1604. 4
  1605. 4
  1606. 4
  1607. 4
  1608. 4
  1609. 4
  1610. 4
  1611. 4
  1612. 4
  1613. 4
  1614. 4
  1615. 4
  1616. 4
  1617. 4
  1618. 4
  1619. 4
  1620. 4
  1621. 4
  1622. 4
  1623. 4
  1624. 4
  1625. 4
  1626. 4
  1627. 4
  1628. 4
  1629. 4
  1630. 4
  1631. 4
  1632. 4
  1633. 4
  1634. 4
  1635. 4
  1636. 4
  1637. 4
  1638. 4
  1639. 4
  1640. 4
  1641. 4
  1642. 4
  1643. 4
  1644. 4
  1645. 4
  1646. 4
  1647. 4
  1648. 4
  1649.  @jxz107  "Direct quotes followed by further denial." usually by other politicians and sometimes way later. So basically it's enough for you that if one or a handful of politicians at any point say anything suggesting denial, you will no longer accept anything that the government says. Like I said, you guys are just looking for excuses to keep using this for political reasons. >A small minority that assume the highest political positions in Japan Still a small minority of the political positions. Again, you are just looking for excuses. >You seem to have difficulty understanding what being a state representative means. The President is the head of state So you're saying most of the presidents of Japan have denied it? Source?? >Considering that Japan does not have a religiously neutral institution like Arlington, Because the US is very secular when it comes to public monuments. You should know this. >How many are Class A war criminals? In the Yasukunia shrine? About 0.0005% of the names on the shrine. >"You're operating under the false assumption that Korea is obligated to be silent just because other countries are doing so." you're operating under the false assumption that I said South Kore is legally obligated to never accept an apology. You're operating under the false assumptions that we can't criticize governments for using this as a political football while it damages their national security. >The Vietnamese state may not, but go to central Vietnam Yet 82% of Vietnamese have a favorable opinion of Japan and South Korea and even higher for the US. Are you not capable of understand that 82% is much more than the 25% approval of Japan there is in South Korea? And are you able to understand that some in Vietnam still having grievances doesn't mean it's a grudge held on by the average person?
    4
  1650. 4
  1651. 4
  1652. 4
  1653. 4
  1654. 4
  1655. 4
  1656. 4
  1657. 4
  1658. 4
  1659. 4
  1660. 4
  1661. 4
  1662. 4
  1663. 4
  1664. 4
  1665. 4
  1666.  @theotherohlourdespadua1131  Well, Japan has said sorry and the list is long. Wikipedia has a whole page on it titled "List of war apology statements issued by Japan". For you say that Japan hasn't is a bit out of touch with reality. There are certainly the occasional politician that really messes it up but let's be real -- South Korea keeps moving the goal posts, demands more and more, and keeps pressing. It's used by many South Korean officials for nationalistic support in politics much like they do in China. And you bring up " The fact they file diplomatic protests every time a country unveils a monument to Japanese atrocities ". First, it's not every time. Second, sometimes it's because South or China are doing it and they refuse to accept an apology and move the goal post. That grows tiring after a while and it will create backlash in Japan as a result. Philippines lost 500,000 people to Japan and they have very favorable opinion of Japan. Vietnam was also conquered and they have very favorable opinion of Japan. If you say they aren't the same as South Korea - Japan, then look at Vietnam's extremely favorable opinion of the US and a favorable opinion of France. The US was at war with Vietnam and 3 million Vietnamese died. 30 years after the war finished, Vietnam had favorable opinions of the US. it's been about 80 years since Japan was last in Korea. And Vietnam has favorable opinion of their former colonist that left AFTER ww2. You can point to examples where Japan has screwed up but it's obvious that South Korea is is purposely pushing this over and over, moving the goal posts, demanding more each time, and never satisfied.....for what appears to be nationalism for political support.
    4
  1667. 4
  1668. 4
  1669. 4
  1670. 4
  1671. 4
  1672. 4
  1673. 4
  1674. 4
  1675. 4
  1676. 4
  1677. 4
  1678. 4
  1679. 4
  1680. 4
  1681. 4
  1682. 4
  1683. 4
  1684. 4
  1685. 4
  1686. 4
  1687. 4
  1688. 4
  1689. 4
  1690. 4
  1691. 4
  1692. 4
  1693. 4
  1694. 4
  1695. 4
  1696. 4
  1697. 4
  1698. 4
  1699. 4
  1700. 4
  1701. 4
  1702. 4
  1703. 4
  1704. 4
  1705. 4
  1706. 4
  1707. 4
  1708. 4
  1709. 4
  1710. 4
  1711. 4
  1712. 4
  1713. 4
  1714. 4
  1715. 4
  1716. 4
  1717. 4
  1718. 4
  1719. 4
  1720. 4
  1721. 4
  1722. 4
  1723. 4
  1724. 4
  1725. 4
  1726. 4
  1727. 4
  1728. 4
  1729. 4
  1730. 4
  1731. 4
  1732. 4
  1733. 4
  1734. 4
  1735. 4
  1736. 4
  1737. 4
  1738. 4
  1739. 4
  1740. 4
  1741. 4
  1742. 4
  1743. 4
  1744. 4
  1745. 4
  1746. 4
  1747. 4
  1748. 4
  1749. 4
  1750. 4
  1751. 4
  1752. 4
  1753. 4
  1754. 4
  1755. 4
  1756. 4
  1757. 4
  1758. 4
  1759. 4
  1760. 4
  1761. 4
  1762. 4
  1763. 4
  1764. 4
  1765. 4
  1766. 4
  1767. 4
  1768. 4
  1769. 4
  1770. 4
  1771. 4
  1772. 4
  1773. 4
  1774. 4
  1775. 4
  1776. 4
  1777. 4
  1778. 4
  1779. 4
  1780. 4
  1781. 4
  1782. 4
  1783. 4
  1784. 4
  1785. 4
  1786. 4
  1787. 4
  1788. 4
  1789. 4
  1790. 4
  1791. 4
  1792. 4
  1793. 4
  1794. 4
  1795. 4
  1796. 4
  1797. 4
  1798. 4
  1799. 4
  1800. 4
  1801. 4
  1802. 4
  1803. 4
  1804. 4
  1805. 4
  1806. 4
  1807. 4
  1808. 4
  1809. 4
  1810. 4
  1811. 4
  1812. 4
  1813. 4
  1814. 4
  1815. 4
  1816. 4
  1817. 4
  1818. 4
  1819. 4
  1820. 4
  1821. 4
  1822. 4
  1823. 4
  1824. 4
  1825. 4
  1826. 4
  1827. 4
  1828. 4
  1829. 4
  1830. 4
  1831. 4
  1832. 4
  1833. 4
  1834. 4
  1835. 4
  1836. 4
  1837. 4
  1838. 4
  1839. 4
  1840. 3
  1841. 3
  1842. 3
  1843. 3
  1844. 3
  1845. 3
  1846. 3
  1847. 3
  1848. 3
  1849. 3
  1850. 3
  1851. 3
  1852. 3
  1853. 3
  1854. 3
  1855. 3
  1856. 3
  1857. 3
  1858. 3
  1859.  @shuruiliu5713  " of course Chinese government made some bad decision before" Would you say the concentration camps and genocide in Xijiang are bad decisions? Just a litmus test. " But building HSR is not one of bad decisions" Why, Because you said so? HSR is good - but why does EVERY ROUTE need to be good? This is the problem with you and many here -- suggesting no HSR route can be bad. China has $1 trillion in debt and RAPIDLY rising on HSR despite having many routes that are very profitable. That means the routes that are not profitable are losing LOTS of money, well in excess of $1 trillion. THE VIDEO EVEN DISCUSSED HOW CHINA BUILT THE FASTEST HSR LINES THAT ARE NEARLY TWICE THE COST OF A LITTLE SLOWER HSR. Money is limited and there are much better things to spend money on than on luxury services like HSR for routes that loose lots of money. They could build more affordable housing, more traditional rail, or just slower HSR. >Traditional rail is also built at the same time. In my province, shandong province. they plan to build 200km traditional rail for cargo freight this year. Exactly, they could have already built all that if China wasn't trying to impress the world by building the most expensive fastest HSR to routes that don't need it. Basically, your whole argument relies on this: 1. there is no such thing as bad HSR decisions so long as it's built 2. It's always best to keep building more and more of the fastest HSR regardless if there is demand or a much less expensive slower HSR. 3. There can be NOTHING else that China can spend money on other than the fastest HSR.
    3
  1860. 3
  1861. 3
  1862. 3
  1863. 3
  1864. 3
  1865. 3
  1866. 3
  1867. 3
  1868. 3
  1869. 3
  1870. 3
  1871. 3
  1872. 3
  1873. 3
  1874. 3
  1875. 3
  1876. 3
  1877. 3
  1878. 3
  1879. 3
  1880. 3
  1881. 3
  1882. 3
  1883. 3
  1884. 3
  1885. 3
  1886. 3
  1887. 3
  1888. 3
  1889. 3
  1890. 3
  1891. 3
  1892. 3
  1893. 3
  1894. 3
  1895. 3
  1896. 3
  1897. 3
  1898. 3
  1899. 3
  1900. 3
  1901. 3
  1902. 3
  1903. 3
  1904. 3
  1905. 3
  1906. 3
  1907. 3
  1908. 3
  1909. 3
  1910. 3
  1911. 3
  1912. 3
  1913. 3
  1914. 3
  1915. 3
  1916. 3
  1917. 3
  1918. 3
  1919. 3
  1920. 3
  1921. 3
  1922. 3
  1923. 3
  1924. 3
  1925. 3
  1926. 3
  1927. 3
  1928. 3
  1929. 3
  1930. 3
  1931. 3
  1932. 3
  1933. 3
  1934. 3
  1935. 3
  1936. 3
  1937. 3
  1938. 3
  1939. 3
  1940. 3
  1941. 3
  1942. 3
  1943. 3
  1944. 3
  1945. 3
  1946. 3
  1947. 3
  1948. 3
  1949. 3
  1950. 3
  1951. 3
  1952. 3
  1953. 3
  1954. 3
  1955. 3
  1956. 3
  1957.  @raylopez99  geographic factors? You can see how even Latin America is more like Europe and southern Europe than US and Canada. The Older American cities tend to have high density and mixed zoning in and near the center but outer parts start looking more like typical suburbs. And suburbs in the US Is where most people live and it’s far less densely populated than even European suburbs. One thing that really pointed out the difference for me was on a trip in Spain where we hired a ride to get us from Granada to seville. Wow, it’s simply amazing to me how both Granada and Seville are densely populated to the edge then suddenly no more houses and just farms. Seems they highly limit where people can build houses and thus everyone is pushed into a smaller area. As we entered seville it really stood out the most. It was farms but then suddenly I could see what looked like a wall. It was just multi floor apartment buildings at the edge of the city marking the first homes. You will never see that in the US. It’s always low density villages that blend into higher density but still low density out suburbs that then blend into higher density but still lower density typical suburbia which then gradually becomes more dense as you get closer to the city. Most suburbs in the US have zoning requiring min lot areas and minimum distances Homes are too the street thus it creates minimum yard sizes. And they often have only residential zoning in some area meaning it might be .5 to 1 mile to the nearest store. This is why a car is a complete necessity in most places Americans live. Newer cities they grew mostly in the 20th century all seem like one big suburbs. The only high density you might see is the very center business district.
    3
  1958. 3
  1959. 3
  1960. 3
  1961. 3
  1962. 3
  1963. 3
  1964. 3
  1965. 3
  1966. 3
  1967. 3
  1968. 3
  1969. 3
  1970. 3
  1971. 3
  1972. 3
  1973. 3
  1974. 3
  1975. 3
  1976. 3
  1977. 3
  1978. 3
  1979. 3
  1980. 3
  1981. 3
  1982. 3
  1983. 3
  1984. 3
  1985. 3
  1986. 3
  1987. 3
  1988. 3
  1989. 3
  1990. 3
  1991. 3
  1992. 3
  1993. 3
  1994. 3
  1995. 3
  1996. 3
  1997. 3
  1998. 3
  1999. 3
  2000. 3
  2001. 3
  2002. 3
  2003. 3
  2004. 3
  2005. 3
  2006. 3
  2007. 3
  2008. 3
  2009. 3
  2010. 3
  2011. 3
  2012. 3
  2013. 3
  2014. 3
  2015. 3
  2016. 3
  2017. 3
  2018. 3
  2019. 3
  2020. 3
  2021. 3
  2022. 3
  2023. 3
  2024. 3
  2025. 3
  2026. 3
  2027. 3
  2028. 3
  2029. 3
  2030. 3
  2031. 3
  2032. 3
  2033. 3
  2034. 3
  2035. 3
  2036. 3
  2037. 3
  2038. 3
  2039. 3
  2040. 3
  2041. 3
  2042. 3
  2043. 3
  2044. 3
  2045. 3
  2046. 3
  2047. 3
  2048. 3
  2049. 3
  2050. 3
  2051. 3
  2052. 3
  2053. 3
  2054. 3
  2055. 3
  2056. 3
  2057. 3
  2058. 3
  2059. 3
  2060. 3
  2061. 3
  2062. 3
  2063. 3
  2064. 3
  2065. 3
  2066. 3
  2067. 3
  2068. 3
  2069. 3
  2070. 3
  2071. 3
  2072. 3
  2073. 3
  2074. 3
  2075. 3
  2076. 3
  2077. 3
  2078. 3
  2079. 3
  2080. 3
  2081. 3
  2082. 3
  2083. 3
  2084. 3
  2085. 3
  2086. 3
  2087. 3
  2088. 3
  2089. 3
  2090. 3
  2091. 3
  2092. 3
  2093. 3
  2094. 3
  2095. 3
  2096. 3
  2097. 3
  2098. 3
  2099. 3
  2100. 3
  2101. 3
  2102. 3
  2103. 3
  2104. 3
  2105. 3
  2106. 3
  2107. 3
  2108. 3
  2109. 3
  2110. 3
  2111. 3
  2112. 3
  2113. 3
  2114. 3
  2115. 3
  2116. 3
  2117. 3
  2118. 3
  2119. 3
  2120. 3
  2121. 3
  2122. 3
  2123. 3
  2124. 3
  2125. 3
  2126. 3
  2127. 3
  2128. 3
  2129. 3
  2130. 3
  2131. 3
  2132. 3
  2133. 3
  2134. 3
  2135. 3
  2136. 3
  2137. 3
  2138. 3
  2139. 3
  2140. 3
  2141. 3
  2142. 3
  2143. 3
  2144. 3
  2145. 3
  2146. 3
  2147. 3
  2148. 3
  2149. 3
  2150. 3
  2151. 3
  2152. 3
  2153.  @realname4401  "Then the transition will be to cheap moderately skilled labor." Saying that doesn't mean it will happen successfully enough to get China to be anywhere near on par with Japan, South Korea or Western Europe let alone the US which is even higher GDP per capita than all of those. Are you really going to ignore all the data already showing China's GDP growth are now projecting to be at most about 4% annual growth for the rest of the decade? " Subsidies are labor costs if you think about it. The money is still coming from somewhere" Yeah, a rather fast growing total debt to GDP ratio is higher than the US already!! I'm referring to total debt from government debt to corporate debt to personal debt. China uses state owned businesses and the debt from individuals that pay for homes (which was the biggest contributor to GDP) for much of it's debt but it's still debt in the society. Unlike the US, China's currency is not the main reserve currency in the world so they cannot run as much debt as the US. These debts means fewer investments for things that will grow the economy the best. In fact, new debt being taken on by China is having a much smaller return in investment than just 4 or 5 years ago.. To go over some of those debt numbers, the household debt to household income ratio in China is higher than the US and has been higher since about 216. The US ratio has been falling steadily from 2007ish to 2019 (last year of the report) while China has been growing steadily from 2008 to 2019. China's at about 125% in 2019 to the US around 100%.. There's also data on "private debt / gdp" which I believe is all debt not from the government (individuals and businesses) and it's more of the same. US has been falling since a out 2008 and was around 150% in 2019 or 2020. China has been growing at a fast rate with their private debt /gdp ratio hitting around 217% in 2019. Then they have a a total debt to GDP ratio comparison. This data is from Money & Macro and they discussed how China's GDP is likely highly overestimated and true GDP might be around 40-60% of the Chinese official state provided GDP. But they point out that even using China's official GDP figures, they already are close to 300% total Debt to GDP ratio, roughly where the US is at. And using the estimated GDP, China's Debt to GDP ration is up to 700%!! So yes, those subsidies are coming from somewhere and it's debt. Debt that is rising and already higher than the US by some metrics when compared to GDP and growing fast.
    3
  2154. 3
  2155.  @2KSnSLifestyle  I don't even know what your trying to argue. It seems like you are trying to blindly defend China without even knowing what I had argued. All my arguments have been to point out that China's GDP growth is slowing down and projected to be 3-3.5% by 2030 and under 3% by 2040. I'm also pointing out that other countries are stepping up and taking some of the lost growth of China. These are simple facts. But instead, you just went on some tangent just trying to defend China by raising points that don't prove anything I said was wrong and some of what you raised is inaccurate or misleading or just huge assumptions on your behalf. For example "All OPEC countries have joined the BRI and allow China to buy oil in RMB". That's not remotely true. Some countries in OPEC are considering it -- but it hasn't happened. Saudi Arabia & Iran? Great, all it did was just say those two will talk. It's a minor accomplishment. The only big news there is that China was involved but the actual agreement was not a big deal. And Russia? You mean China's close allies where both China and Russia are a threat to the world? And the bank failures in the west? High interest? Sure, but China had a failure in Evergrande and the housing market is about to collapse so China is spending large amounts of money trying to prevent a horrible crash. All of this is happening as many Chinese are moving their money out of China due to concerns with Xi's policies. Foreign investments into China are dropping as well for the same reason. And the demographic crisis means China is seeing a smaller and smaller work force which is why most economist, banks and other financial experts are estimating China's GDP growth will be close to 3% in just 7 years and falling more after thus meaning China will never get near Japan or South Korea on per capita wealth and incomes.
    3
  2156. 3
  2157. 3
  2158. 3
  2159. 3
  2160. 3
  2161. 3
  2162. 3
  2163. 3
  2164. 3
  2165. 3
  2166. 3
  2167. 3
  2168. 3
  2169. 3
  2170. 3
  2171. 3
  2172. 3
  2173. 3
  2174. 3
  2175. 3
  2176. 3
  2177. 3
  2178. 3
  2179. 3
  2180. 3
  2181. 3
  2182. 3
  2183. 3
  2184. 3
  2185. 3
  2186. 3
  2187. 3
  2188. 3
  2189. 3
  2190. 3
  2191. 3
  2192. 3
  2193. 3
  2194. 3
  2195. 3
  2196. 3
  2197. 3
  2198. 3
  2199. 3
  2200. 3
  2201. 3
  2202. 3
  2203. 3
  2204. 3
  2205. 3
  2206. 3
  2207. 3
  2208. 3
  2209. 3
  2210. 3
  2211. 3
  2212. 3
  2213. 3
  2214. 3
  2215. 3
  2216. 3
  2217. 3
  2218. 3
  2219. 3
  2220. 3
  2221. 3
  2222. 3
  2223. 3
  2224. 3
  2225. 3
  2226. 3
  2227. 3
  2228. 3
  2229. 3
  2230. 3
  2231. 3
  2232. 3
  2233. 3
  2234. 3
  2235. 3
  2236. 3
  2237. 3
  2238. 3
  2239. 3
  2240. 3
  2241. 3
  2242. 3
  2243. 3
  2244. 3
  2245. 3
  2246. 3
  2247. 3
  2248. 3
  2249. 3
  2250. 3
  2251. 3
  2252. 3
  2253. 3
  2254. 3
  2255. 3
  2256. 3
  2257. 3
  2258. 3
  2259. 3
  2260. 3
  2261. 3
  2262. 3
  2263. 3
  2264. 3
  2265. 3
  2266. 3
  2267. 3
  2268. 3
  2269. 3
  2270. 3
  2271. 3
  2272. 3
  2273. 3
  2274. 3
  2275. 3
  2276. 3
  2277. 3
  2278. 3
  2279. 3
  2280. 3
  2281. 3
  2282. 3
  2283. 3
  2284. 3
  2285. 3
  2286. 3
  2287. 3
  2288. 3
  2289. 3
  2290. 3
  2291. 3
  2292. 3
  2293. 3
  2294. 3
  2295. 3
  2296. 3
  2297. 3
  2298. 3
  2299. 3
  2300. 3
  2301. 3
  2302. 3
  2303. 3
  2304. 3
  2305. 3
  2306. 3
  2307. 3
  2308. 3
  2309. 3
  2310. 3
  2311. 3
  2312. 3
  2313. 3
  2314. 3
  2315. 3
  2316. 3
  2317. 3
  2318. 3
  2319. 3
  2320. 3
  2321. 3
  2322. 3
  2323. 3
  2324. 3
  2325. 3
  2326. 3
  2327. 3
  2328. 3
  2329. 3
  2330. 3
  2331. 3
  2332. 3
  2333. 3
  2334. 3
  2335. 3
  2336. 3
  2337. 3
  2338. 3
  2339. 3
  2340. 3
  2341. 3
  2342. 3
  2343. 3
  2344. 3
  2345. 3
  2346. 3
  2347. 3
  2348. 3
  2349. 3
  2350. 3
  2351. 3
  2352. 3
  2353. 3
  2354. 3
  2355. 3
  2356. 3
  2357. 3
  2358. 3
  2359. 3
  2360. 3
  2361. 3
  2362. 3
  2363. 3
  2364. 3
  2365. 3
  2366. 3
  2367. 3
  2368. 3
  2369. 3
  2370. 3
  2371. 3
  2372. 3
  2373. 3
  2374. 3
  2375. 3
  2376. 3
  2377. 3
  2378. 3
  2379. 3
  2380. 3
  2381. 3
  2382. 3
  2383. 3
  2384. 3
  2385. 3
  2386. 3
  2387. 3
  2388. 3
  2389. 3
  2390. 3
  2391. 3
  2392. 3
  2393. 3
  2394. 3
  2395. 3
  2396. 3
  2397. 3
  2398. 3
  2399. 3
  2400. 3
  2401. 3
  2402. 3
  2403. 3
  2404. 3
  2405. 3
  2406. 3
  2407. 3
  2408. 3
  2409. 3
  2410. 3
  2411. 3
  2412. 3
  2413. 3
  2414. 3
  2415. 3
  2416. 3
  2417. 3
  2418. 3
  2419. 3
  2420. 3
  2421. 3
  2422. 3
  2423. 3
  2424. 3
  2425. 3
  2426. 3
  2427. 3
  2428. 3
  2429. 3
  2430. 3
  2431. 3
  2432. 3
  2433. 3
  2434. 3
  2435. 3
  2436. 3
  2437. 3
  2438. 3
  2439. 3
  2440. 3
  2441. 3
  2442. 3
  2443. 3
  2444. 3
  2445. 3
  2446. 3
  2447. 3
  2448. 3
  2449. 3
  2450. 3
  2451. 3
  2452. 3
  2453. 3
  2454. 3
  2455. 3
  2456. 3
  2457. 3
  2458. 3
  2459. 3
  2460. 3
  2461. 3
  2462. 3
  2463. 3
  2464. 3
  2465. 3
  2466. 3
  2467. 3
  2468. 3
  2469.  @LENZ5369  "you keep bringing in stuff that is not relevant and expanding the issue." I'm literally bringing up the relevant issues, it's you that isn't. - "This not about total tourism or whatever -this is about what is happening in that "PROTECTED" area." Like this, you refuse to understand what is relevant to the discussion. Total tourism was to fact check your suggestion of how trophy hunting safaris bring in more money. There is a difference between bringing in more money PER person vs bringing in more money in TOTAL. That's why total tourism matters. Why do you keep trying to argue that non-hunting safaris are bad because trophy hunting safaris are happening? They are not the same and some countries don't allow trophy hunting safaris, such as Kenya. Each time I try to defend the non-hunting safaris, you dish-nestly conflate it with hunting safaris. They are separate arguments and not related to each other. - "Do you honestly believe supporting 20 or 30 times more people in that park will be less damaging than the handful of rich aho?" If they only deal with the rich who want trophy hunting, there is less incentive for these poor countries to protect a much larger area of their country. - "The issue was supposed to be the wellbeing of THAT Park and if it is in fact actually being protected or simply being slowly 'used up' for profit." Ideological people with low intelligence tend to think that poor countries will simply protect lands without any profit. Are you a communist as well? You think people will just magically work their hardest for the common good to produce food and goods or do you think incentives (money) help more?
    3
  2470. 3
  2471. 3
  2472. 3
  2473. 3
  2474. 3
  2475. 3
  2476. 3
  2477. 3
  2478. 3
  2479. 3
  2480. 3
  2481. 3
  2482. 3
  2483. 3
  2484. 3
  2485. 3
  2486. 3
  2487. 3
  2488. 3
  2489. 3
  2490. 3
  2491. 3
  2492. 3
  2493. 3
  2494. 3
  2495. 3
  2496. 3
  2497. 3
  2498. 3
  2499. 3
  2500. 3
  2501. 3
  2502. 3
  2503. 3
  2504. 3
  2505. 3
  2506. 3
  2507. 3
  2508. 3
  2509. 3
  2510. 3
  2511. 3
  2512. 3
  2513. 3
  2514. 3
  2515. 3
  2516. 3
  2517. 3
  2518. 3
  2519. 3
  2520. 3
  2521. 3
  2522. 3
  2523. 3
  2524. 3
  2525. 3
  2526. 3
  2527. 3
  2528. 3
  2529. 3
  2530. 3
  2531. 3
  2532. 3
  2533. 3
  2534. 3
  2535. 3
  2536. 3
  2537. 3
  2538. 3
  2539. 3
  2540. 3
  2541. 3
  2542. 3
  2543. 3
  2544. 3
  2545. 3
  2546. 3
  2547. 3
  2548. 3
  2549. 3
  2550. 3
  2551. 3
  2552. 3
  2553. 3
  2554. 3
  2555. 3
  2556. 3
  2557. 3
  2558. 3
  2559. 3
  2560. 3
  2561. 3
  2562. 3
  2563. 3
  2564. 3
  2565. 3
  2566. 3
  2567. 3
  2568. 3
  2569. 3
  2570. 3
  2571. 3
  2572. 3
  2573. 3
  2574. 3
  2575. 3
  2576. 3
  2577. 3
  2578. 3
  2579. 3
  2580. 3
  2581. 3
  2582. 3
  2583. 3
  2584. 3
  2585. 3
  2586. 3
  2587. 3
  2588. 3
  2589. 3
  2590. 3
  2591. 3
  2592. 3
  2593. 3
  2594. 3
  2595. 3
  2596. 3
  2597. 3
  2598. 3
  2599. 3
  2600. 3
  2601. 3
  2602. 3
  2603. 3
  2604. 3
  2605. 3
  2606. 3
  2607. 3
  2608. 3
  2609. 3
  2610. 3
  2611. 3
  2612. 3
  2613. 3
  2614. 3
  2615. 3
  2616. 3
  2617. 3
  2618. 3
  2619. 3
  2620. 3
  2621. 3
  2622. 2
  2623. 2
  2624. 2
  2625. 2
  2626. 2
  2627. 2
  2628. 2
  2629. 2
  2630. 2
  2631. 2
  2632. 2
  2633. 2
  2634. 2
  2635. 2
  2636. 2
  2637. 2
  2638. 2
  2639. 2
  2640. 2
  2641. 2
  2642. 2
  2643. 2
  2644. 2
  2645. 2
  2646. 2
  2647. 2
  2648. 2
  2649. 2
  2650. 2
  2651. 2
  2652. 2
  2653. 2
  2654. 2
  2655. 2
  2656. 2
  2657. 2
  2658. 2
  2659. 2
  2660. 2
  2661. 2
  2662. 2
  2663. 2
  2664. 2
  2665. 2
  2666. 2
  2667. 2
  2668. @agapp11able - Most new HSR lines in China have witnessed a sharp decline in their “transportation density”. Measured in passenger-kilometres, it is an indicator that projects the line’s operating efficiency in terms of annual average transport volume per kilometre. For example, while the 1,318-kilometre Beijing-Shanghai HSR corridor’s transportation density was 48 million passenger-kilometres in 2015 and continues to be high, the 1,776-kilometre Lanzhou-Urumqi line has only 2.3 million passenger-kilometres of transportation density. China’s overall transportation density of HSR was 17 million passenger-kilometres in 2015, while it was 34 million passenger-kilometres for Japan’s Shinkansen in the same year. - - The craze for HSR has made China neglect the construction of conventional systems, adversely affecting the balance of the country’s logistics mix. As a result, rail has consistently trailed road and water freight transport for the past several years. This has led to growing investments in polluting freight road trucks and trailers, offsetting the environmental gains resulting from HSR. - In the past few years, mega borrowings by provincial governments to monetise its HSR lines have created a debt trap, which is now pinching the coffers of the state-owned CRC. CRC’s financial woes started nearly four years ago when more than 60 percent of the HSR operators each lost a minimum of US $100 million in 2018. That year, the least profitable operator in Chengdu reported net loss of US $1.8 billion. In the same year, transport economists in China had predicted an impending debt crisis for the country’s HSR that was dependent on “unsustainable government subsidies with many lines incapable of repaying the interest on their debt, let alone principal”, and were caught in a vicious cycle of “raising new debt to pay off old debt”. Consequently, since 2015, CRC’s interest payments have been significantly higher than its operating profits, shrinking its bottom line.
    2
  2669. 2
  2670. 2
  2671. 2
  2672. 2
  2673. 2
  2674. 2
  2675. 2
  2676. 2
  2677. 2
  2678. 2
  2679. 2
  2680. 2
  2681. 2
  2682. 2
  2683. 2
  2684. 2
  2685. 2
  2686. ​@agapp11able WUMAO, ASPI has a great article on how China often tries to lie and use propaganda videos which wumaos like you then use to say "see, no detention facility of Uyghurs!" - Last month, Global Times editor Hu Xijin visited what he referred to as a ‘vocational training center’ in Kashgar. He posted a two-minute video of the trip on his Twitter account - But by July 2017, when construction was complete, every ‘school’ building in the southwest of the facility (previously Middle School No. 5) was surrounded by tall fencing that had been painted green and topped with razor wire. By August, much of School No. 6 was enclosed with similar fencing. Upon completion in around November 2017, School No. 4 was also highly securitised and a tender was released calling for bidders to oversee and install new equipment, including a new surveillance camera system - The video posted by Hu Xijin of Middle School No. 4 on 24 October shows detainees dancing and playing table-tennis and basketball. However, this visit—and the footage shared on social media—may not reflect the regular daily experiences of the detainees. - Through satellite and imagery analysis—including imagery updated daily—we can determine that these courts are coloured mats that are recent additions to the camp. The mats were placed on a concrete-covered area that is normally bare and appears inaccessible to detainees. - Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October
    2
  2687. 2
  2688. 2
  2689. 2
  2690. 2
  2691. 2
  2692. 2
  2693. @agapp11able Basically, these are the points: 1. You only trust the CCP and will not accept anything from any western country be it an humanatarian orginization or legit news org. However, you will accept anything that is from China or supports China. 2.. Aspi identified likely camps and you said they are just schools and drug rehab facilities. You have refused to actually provide a source.. You just consistently saying there are didn’t make it true. Give a source 3. You pointed to the Pichan Facility #4 and said that it's not a detenton facility simply for being near apartments even though the CCP has allowed BBC to visit a low security camp and it was near apartment buildings. In the same video, the bbc attempted to go to another facility in town which was also near apartments but the CCP officials kicked out the BBC from the area and stopped them from filming. 4. ASPI said they identified 380+ very likely facilities. You have only been able to directly point to one and your assumptions on it are wrong (see #3) but yet even if that wasn't a camp, you believe that if you find one facility they were wrong with it means they are wrong with all the remaining 380ish. ASPI has two ratings – ‘likely’ and ‘confirmed’. Even if one or two are wrong, it does not mean that most of the rest are wrong. If they were, why don’t you have evidence on all 380 but instead try to claim about 3 or 4 are wrong? 5. . Asked to make major criticism of the CCP that the CCP hasn’t already acknowledged --- All you did was say “they banned private tutors and healthcare isn’t universal”. You are unable to Give a serious criticism 6. Lied that I said that all 12 million Muslims in Xinjiang were sent to the camps. Me saying 12 million Muslims in Xinjiang doesn’t mean I’m saying all 12 million are or were in camps. 7. Said that Corporations never lie that they use forced labor or sweat shop labor and also argued that since Skechers said their two facilities in China didn't have forced labor, it means China doesn't have any forced labor. 8. Lied and that ASPI had said that there are two million in the camps at this exact moment. Unable to provide a source. 9. Lied that Amnesty International with funded by the CIA with CIA money. It was actually founded by Peter Benenson and Eric Baker and it does not accept donations from governments or governmental organizations. 10. Lied that ASPI funding from Australian governments is only 37%. 11. You literally used CCP 100% controlled news as your sources while you reject anything from the west for whatever reason you can think of. The CCP video also included ‘evidence’ from CCP employee Einar Tangen - Economic and Political Affairs Commentator CCTV, CGTN, CRI, China.org.cn, Xinhua. 12. You said that Marlabashi Detention center no 1 was in fact a school. Because the Chinese state media source you used cut to a classroom that could be located anywhere. If it was just a school, there would be tons of videos of the school being a school. Kids getting out of class, playing inside those walls, etc. But you won’t provide any such video and just belive the CCP when they say the classroom they showed was indeed inside the facility.
    2
  2694. 2
  2695. 2
  2696. 2
  2697. 2
  2698. 2
  2699. @agapp11able @agapp11able Basically, these are the points: 1. You only trust the CCP and will not accept anything from any western country be it an humanitarian organization or legit news org. However, you will accept anything that is from China or supports China. 2.. Aspi identified likely camps and you said they are just schools and drug rehab facilities. You have refused to actually provide a source.. You just consistently saying there are didn’t make it true. Give a source 3. You pointed to the Pichan Facility #4 and said that it's not a detention facility simply for being near apartments even though the CCP has allowed BBC to visit a low security camp and it was near apartment buildings. In the same video, the bbc attempted to go to another facility in town which was also near apartments but the CCP officials kicked out the BBC from the area and stopped them from filming. 4. ASPI said they identified 380+ very likely facilities. You have only been able to directly point to one and your assumptions on it are wrong (see #3) but yet even if that wasn't a camp, you believe that if you find one facility they were wrong with it means they are wrong with all the remaining 380ish. ASPI has two ratings – ‘likely’ and ‘confirmed’. Even if one or two are wrong, it does not mean that most of the rest are wrong. If they were, why don’t you have evidence on all 380 but instead try to claim about 3 or 4 are wrong? 5. . Asked to make major criticism of the CCP that the CCP hasn’t already acknowledged --- All you did was say “they banned private tutors and healthcare isn’t universal”. You are unable to Give a serious criticism 6. Lied that I said that all 12 million Muslims in Xinjiang were sent to the camps. Me saying 12 million Muslims in Xinjiang doesn’t mean I’m saying all 12 million are or were in camps. 7. Said that Corporations never lie that they use forced labor or sweat shop labor and also argued that since Skechers said their two facilities in China didn't have forced labor, it means China doesn't have any forced labor. 8. Lied and that ASPI had said that there are two million in the camps at this exact moment. Unable to provide a source. 9. Lied that Amnesty International with funded by the CIA with CIA money. It was actually founded by Peter Benenson and Eric Baker and it does not accept donations from governments or governmental organizations. 10. Lied that ASPI funding from Australian governments is only 37%. 11. You literally used CCP 100% controlled news as your sources while you reject anything from the west for whatever reason you can think of. The CCP video also included ‘evidence’ from CCP employee Einar Tangen - Economic and Political Affairs Commentator CCTV, CGTN, CRI, China.org.cn, Xinhua. 12. You said that Marlabashi Detention center no 1 was in fact a school. Because the Chinese state media source you used cut to a classroom that could be located anywhere. If it was just a school, there would be tons of videos of the school being a school. Kids getting out of class, playing inside those walls, etc. But you won’t provide any such video and just belive the CCP when they say the classroom they showed was indeed inside the facility.
    2
  2700. 2
  2701. 2
  2702. @agapp11able WUMAO, ASPI has a great article on how China often tries to lie and use propaganda videos which wumaos like you then use to say "see, no detention facility of Uyghurs!" - Last month, Global Times editor Hu Xijin visited what he referred to as a ‘vocational training center’ in Kashgar. He posted a two-minute video of the trip on his Twitter account - But by July 2017, when construction was complete, every ‘school’ building in the southwest of the facility (previously Middle School No. 5) was surrounded by tall fencing that had been painted green and topped with razor wire. By August, much of School No. 6 was enclosed with similar fencing. Upon completion in around November 2017, School No. 4 was also highly securitised and a tender was released calling for bidders to oversee and install new equipment, including a new surveillance camera system - The video posted by Hu Xijin of Middle School No. 4 on 24 October shows detainees dancing and playing table-tennis and basketball. However, this visit—and the footage shared on social media—may not reflect the regular daily experiences of the detainees. - Through satellite and imagery analysis—including imagery updated daily—we can determine that these courts are coloured mats that are recent additions to the camp. The mats were placed on a concrete-covered area that is normally bare and appears inaccessible to detainees. - Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October - Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October
    2
  2703. 2
  2704. 2
  2705. @agapp11able Basically, these are the points: 1. You only trust the CCP and will not accept anything from any western country be it an humanitarian organization or legit news org. However, you will accept anything that is from China or supports China. 2.. Aspi identified likely camps and you said they are just schools and drug rehab facilities. You have refused to actually provide a source.. You just consistently saying there are didn’t make it true. Give a source 3. You pointed to the Pichan Facility #4 and said that it's not a detention facility simply for being near apartments even though the CCP has allowed BBC to visit a low security camp and it was near apartment buildings. In the same video, the bbc attempted to go to another facility in town which was also near apartments but the CCP officials kicked out the BBC from the area and stopped them from filming. 4. ASPI said they identified 380+ very likely facilities. You have only been able to directly point to one and your assumptions on it are wrong (see #3) but yet even if that wasn't a camp, you believe that if you find one facility they were wrong with it means they are wrong with all the remaining 380ish. ASPI has two ratings – ‘likely’ and ‘confirmed’. Even if one or two are wrong, it does not mean that most of the rest are wrong. If they were, why don’t you have evidence on all 380 but instead try to claim about 3 or 4 are wrong? 5. . Asked to make major criticism of the CCP that the CCP hasn’t already acknowledged --- All you did was say “they banned private tutors and healthcare isn’t universal”. You are unable to Give a serious criticism 6. Lied that I said that all 12 million Muslims in Xinjiang were sent to the camps. Me saying 12 million Muslims in Xinjiang doesn’t mean I’m saying all 12 million are or were in camps. 7. Said that Corporations never lie that they use forced labor or sweat shop labor and also argued that since Skechers said their two facilities in China didn't have forced labor, it means China doesn't have any forced labor. 8. Lied and that ASPI had said that there are two million in the camps at this exact moment. Unable to provide a source. 9. Lied that Amnesty International with funded by the CIA with CIA money. It was actually founded by Peter Benenson and Eric Baker and it does not accept donations from governments or governmental organizations. 10. Lied that ASPI funding from Australian governments is only 37%. 11. You literally used CCP 100% controlled news as your sources while you reject anything from the west for whatever reason you can think of. The CCP video also included ‘evidence’ from CCP employee Einar Tangen - Economic and Political Affairs Commentator CCTV, CGTN, CRI, China.org.cn, Xinhua. 12. You said that Marlabashi Detention center no 1 was in fact a school. Because the Chinese state media source you used cut to a classroom that could be located anywhere. If it was just a school, there would be tons of videos of the school being a school. Kids getting out of class, playing inside those walls, etc. But you won’t provide any such video and just belive the CCP when they say the classroom they showed was indeed inside the facility.
    2
  2706. 2
  2707. 2
  2708. 2
  2709. 2
  2710. 2
  2711. 2
  2712. 2
  2713. 2
  2714. 2
  2715. 2
  2716. 2
  2717. 2
  2718. 2
  2719. 2
  2720. 2
  2721. 2
  2722. 2
  2723. 2
  2724. 2
  2725. 2
  2726. 2
  2727. 2
  2728. 2
  2729. 2
  2730. 2
  2731. 2
  2732. 2
  2733. 2
  2734. 2
  2735. 2
  2736. 2
  2737. 2
  2738. 2
  2739. 2
  2740. 2
  2741. 2
  2742. 2
  2743. 2
  2744. 2
  2745. 2
  2746. 2
  2747. 2
  2748. 2
  2749. 2
  2750. 2
  2751. 2
  2752. 2
  2753. 2
  2754. 2
  2755. 2
  2756. 2
  2757. 2
  2758. 2
  2759. 2
  2760. 2
  2761. 2
  2762. 2
  2763. 2
  2764. 2
  2765. 2
  2766. 2
  2767. 2
  2768. 2
  2769. 2
  2770. 2
  2771. 2
  2772. 2
  2773. 2
  2774. 2
  2775. 2
  2776. 2
  2777. 2
  2778. 2
  2779. 2
  2780. 2
  2781. 2
  2782. 2
  2783. 2
  2784. 2
  2785. 2
  2786. 2
  2787. 2
  2788. 2
  2789. 2
  2790. 2
  2791. 2
  2792. 2
  2793. 2
  2794. 2
  2795. 2
  2796. 2
  2797. 2
  2798. 2
  2799. 2
  2800. 2
  2801. 2
  2802. 2
  2803. 2
  2804. 2
  2805. 2
  2806. 2
  2807. 2
  2808. 2
  2809. 2
  2810. 2
  2811. 2
  2812. 2
  2813. 2
  2814. 2
  2815. 2
  2816. 2
  2817. 2
  2818. 2
  2819. 2
  2820. 2
  2821. 2
  2822. 2
  2823. 2
  2824. 2
  2825. 2
  2826. 2
  2827. 2
  2828. 2
  2829. 2
  2830. 2
  2831. 2
  2832. 2
  2833. 2
  2834. Another great video. 4 videos in 2 days. I think India’s actions are indeed siding with Russia but India is conflicted on what is best for India. They aren’t criticizing Putin or Russia and increased purchases of Russian goods so actions suggest pro-Russia. With an authoritarian nationalist like Modi, this is what I expected. And given that 2/3 of Indians blame the west or blame both sides on war that is about the most black and white wrong vs right we have seen in decades, there is indeed some love for Russia in India. But I believe India is starting to realize that the future is with closer ties to the west and India is being impacted by Russia’s decision to invade Ukraine. The reasons why India may be starting to realize the future is with the west were many of the points brought up in the video. India’s biggest foreign policy concern is China, especially after another border clash. It needs the ‘global NATO’ to help counter China in the region. Continued close relationships with Russia will be a stain on India as well. And another major factor not mentioned in the video is that the west (plus allies such as Japan, South Korea, etc) is by far India’s largest trading partners. 18% of India’s exports are to the US alone, the biggest export market. India has had 30+ years to break the relationship. The US seems to be weakening their ties with Pakistan. It appears the US is putting together a military weapons package with discounts to help India break away from reliance on Russian weapons. Will it accept it and start making actual moves to align with the west? Or it’s also possible that India is just trying to milk both sides as much as it can. That nothing will actually change at least in the near future – India keeps it’s friendship with Russia and continues working with the west. Hard to tell.
    2
  2835. 2
  2836. 2
  2837. 2
  2838. 2
  2839. 2
  2840. 2
  2841. 2
  2842. 2
  2843. 2
  2844. 2
  2845. 2
  2846. 2
  2847. 2
  2848. 2
  2849. 2
  2850. 2
  2851. 2
  2852. 2
  2853. 2
  2854. 2
  2855. 2
  2856. 2
  2857. 2
  2858. 2
  2859. 2
  2860. 2
  2861. 2
  2862. 2
  2863. 2
  2864. 2
  2865. 2
  2866. 2
  2867. 2
  2868. 2
  2869. 2
  2870. 2
  2871. 2
  2872.  @Oldmanplum  The most powerful and advanced countries were able to come together and form a system that drastically decreased the amount of war and invasions in the world nearly 100 years ago because society evolved. The world mostly the same from 1000BC to 1400AD. Then there began to be more advance weapons and more support for ideas and thinking-- the renaissance. The progress was slow but you slowly saw early forms of capitalism that changed societies. Capitalism ideas likely spurred from the effects of the renaissance. Then the big changes happened with the Industrial revolution. People began to concentrate around cities creating more opportunity to share ideas. People also began to get wealthier and new industries meant less and less to Kings as people who weren't in the noble class began to become more influential and this included workers. With all these thoughts about democracy and rights, when WW2 happened and much of the world realized weapons were too powerful, they were in position to come together and forma a system that drastically decreased the amount of war and invasions. Wars of conquest all but disappeared in the west and other parts of the world. Most wars after that became wars over territorial rights among bordering stats or a civil war. And a lot of the civil wars were drawn along the lines of communist vs non-communist. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, those civil wars became far less common as communism began to die out. What did increase was the rise of Islamic groups starting civil wars and starting in 2011 a rise of the people against authoritarian governments such as the color revolutions. But it's the series of events that evolved society to get to the point where the world could decrease war.
    2
  2873. 2
  2874. 2
  2875. 2
  2876. 2
  2877. 2
  2878. 2
  2879. 2
  2880. 2
  2881. 2
  2882. 2
  2883. 2
  2884. 2
  2885. 2
  2886. 2
  2887. 2
  2888. 2
  2889. 2
  2890. 2
  2891. 2
  2892. 2
  2893. 2
  2894. 2
  2895. 2
  2896. 2
  2897. 2
  2898. 2
  2899. 2
  2900. 2
  2901. 2
  2902. 2
  2903. 2
  2904. 2
  2905. 2
  2906. 2
  2907. 2
  2908. 2
  2909. 2
  2910. 2
  2911. 2
  2912. 2
  2913. 2
  2914. 2
  2915. 2
  2916. 2
  2917. 2
  2918. 2
  2919. 2
  2920. 2
  2921. 2
  2922. 2
  2923. 2
  2924. 2
  2925. 2
  2926. 2
  2927. 2
  2928. 2
  2929. 2
  2930. 2
  2931. 2
  2932. 2
  2933. 2
  2934. 2
  2935. 2
  2936. 2
  2937. 2
  2938. 2
  2939. 2
  2940. 2
  2941. 2
  2942. 2
  2943. 2
  2944. 2
  2945. 2
  2946. 2
  2947. 2
  2948. 2
  2949. 2
  2950. 2
  2951. 2
  2952. 2
  2953. 2
  2954. 2
  2955. 2
  2956. 2
  2957. 2
  2958. 2
  2959. 2
  2960. 2
  2961. 2
  2962. 2
  2963. 2
  2964. 2
  2965. 2
  2966. 2
  2967. 2
  2968. 2
  2969. 2
  2970. 2
  2971. 2
  2972. 2
  2973. 2
  2974. 2
  2975. 2
  2976. 2
  2977. 2
  2978. 2
  2979. 2
  2980. 2
  2981. 2
  2982. 2
  2983. 2
  2984. 2
  2985. 2
  2986. 2
  2987. 2
  2988. 2
  2989.  @fahadahaf  "I couldn't find any official IMF source that says this, but I'll take your word for it." There are literally many research reports and investigations in to this. Before I read the rest, this already tells me you have ignored facts your whole life when it comes to China. "Your original argument was about the US being the biggest consumer market, unless you are going to argue that GDP is a measure of how big a consumer market is; I really don't know why you are explaining PPP to me" I didn't bring up PPP. I was explaining to someone else why PPP doesn't mean much when it comes to international trade. >Consumption Markets are usually compared using HFCE, which uses nominal figures that don't account for differing prices. Adjusting for PPP, China is the biggest consumer market. And there it goes again. Not able to understand PPP. PPP is only good for domestic comparisons. When it comes to trade, oil at $80 a barrel will sell at $80 to everyone. Doesn't matter what your PPP is, you will have to pay $80. Is this something Fahad can understand? PPP comes into play more regarding domestic services and domestic manufacturing but not international trade. ELY5 (explain it like you're), lets say $1 = 10 yuan. 10 yuan can get you say 1 hour massage in China but $1 in the US gets you 5 minutes. That's where PPP is demonstrating that $1 worth of yuan goes farther than $1 in the US. But that consumer be it individual or business has to buy oil or some other good / resource, the price is the same for everyone. $1 worth of yuan gets you $1 worth of international goods. And since we are talking about consumer market for foreign goods & services, PPP has no place in such a discussion.
    2
  2990. 2
  2991. 2
  2992. 2
  2993. 2
  2994. 2
  2995. 2
  2996. 2
  2997. 2
  2998. 2
  2999. 2
  3000. 2
  3001. 2
  3002. 2
  3003. 2
  3004. 2
  3005. 2
  3006. 2
  3007. 2
  3008. 2
  3009. 2
  3010. 2
  3011. 2
  3012. 2
  3013. 2
  3014. 2
  3015. 2
  3016. 2
  3017. 2
  3018. 2
  3019. 2
  3020. 2
  3021. 2
  3022. 2
  3023. 2
  3024. 2
  3025. 2
  3026. 2
  3027. 2
  3028. 2
  3029. 2
  3030. 2
  3031. 2
  3032. 2
  3033. 2
  3034. 2
  3035. 2
  3036. 2
  3037. 2
  3038. 2
  3039. 2
  3040. 2
  3041. 2
  3042. 2
  3043. 2
  3044. 2
  3045. 2
  3046. 2
  3047. 2
  3048. 2
  3049. 2
  3050. 2
  3051. 2
  3052. 2
  3053. 2
  3054. 2
  3055. 2
  3056. 2
  3057. 2
  3058. 2
  3059. 2
  3060. 2
  3061. 2
  3062. 2
  3063. 2
  3064. 2
  3065. 2
  3066. 2
  3067. 2
  3068. 2
  3069. 2
  3070. 2
  3071. 2
  3072. 2
  3073. 2
  3074. 2
  3075. 2
  3076. 2
  3077. 2
  3078. 2
  3079. 2
  3080. 2
  3081. 2
  3082. 2
  3083. 2
  3084. 2
  3085. 2
  3086. 2
  3087. 2
  3088. 2
  3089. 2
  3090. 2
  3091. 2
  3092. 2
  3093. 2
  3094. 2
  3095. 2
  3096. 2
  3097. 2
  3098. 2
  3099. 2
  3100. 2
  3101. 2
  3102. 2
  3103. 2
  3104. 2
  3105. 2
  3106. 2
  3107. 2
  3108. 2
  3109. 2
  3110. 2
  3111. 2
  3112. 2
  3113. 2
  3114. 2
  3115. 2
  3116. 2
  3117. 2
  3118. 2
  3119. 2
  3120. 2
  3121. 2
  3122. 2
  3123. 2
  3124. 2
  3125. 2
  3126. 2
  3127. 2
  3128. 2
  3129. 2
  3130. 2
  3131. 2
  3132. 2
  3133. 2
  3134. 2
  3135. 2
  3136. 2
  3137. 2
  3138. 2
  3139. 2
  3140. 2
  3141. 2
  3142. 2
  3143. 2
  3144. 2
  3145. 2
  3146. 2
  3147. 2
  3148. 2
  3149. 2
  3150. 2
  3151. 2
  3152. 2
  3153. 2
  3154. 2
  3155. 2
  3156. 2
  3157. 2
  3158. 2
  3159. 2
  3160. 2
  3161. 2
  3162. 2
  3163. 2
  3164. 2
  3165. 2
  3166. 2
  3167. 2
  3168. 2
  3169. 2
  3170. 2
  3171. 2
  3172. 2
  3173. 2
  3174. 2
  3175. 2
  3176. 2
  3177. 2
  3178. 2
  3179. 2
  3180. 2
  3181. 2
  3182. 2
  3183. 2
  3184. 2
  3185. 2
  3186. 2
  3187. 2
  3188. 2
  3189. 2
  3190. 2
  3191. 2
  3192. 2
  3193. 2
  3194. 2
  3195. 2
  3196. 2
  3197. 2
  3198. 2
  3199. 2
  3200. 2
  3201. 2
  3202. 2
  3203. 2
  3204. 2
  3205. 2
  3206. 2
  3207. 2
  3208. 2
  3209. 2
  3210. 2
  3211. 2
  3212. @agapp11able 1. so no source on your lie that China has most of the US debt? 2. No specifics of what ASPI got wrong in their report documenting cccl staging videos? 3. You accept Chinese state media but you refuse to accept ASPI because it’s funded by Australian government? 4. You lied that the aspi report is only words and has not pics/videos 5. You lied that you gave a source on china holding majority of US debt And you are upset people call you a CCP shill? 6. I gave you directed sources supporting that Japan has the most US debt of any country and even then, 2nd place China is just about 3-4% of total US debt. 7. You have argued that ASPI couldn't be trusted because they may have been wrong (your opinion) on 2 facilities out of 400 so they can't be trusted HOWEVER if CCP is wrong on a facility and caught staging videos, they can still be trusted!! And you wonder why people would think you are a CCP shill. LOL. 8. You lied that you gave as a source on the debt ‘Statista’ when I in fact gave you such a source from them and it proved China is 2nd among foreign owned debt and only 3-4% of the total US debt. I gave you the title of the Statista article “Major foreign holders of US treasury” and another source from investopeida while you refuse to provide the title or even quotes from the article. 9. As another source, you used The Grayzone. Mediabaisfactcheck has them as untrustworthy and far left and said of them “A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis” And you wonder why people think you are a CCP shill.
    2
  3213. 2
  3214. 2
  3215. 2
  3216. 2
  3217. 2
  3218. @agapp11able 1. so no source on your lie that China has most of the US debt? 2. No specifics of what ASPI got wrong in their report documenting cccl staging videos? 3. You accept Chinese state media but you refuse to accept ASPI because it’s funded by Australian government? 4. You lied that the aspi report is only words and has not pics/videos 5. You lied that you gave a source on china holding majority of US debt And you are upset people call you a CCP shill? 6. I gave you directed sources supporting that Japan has the most US debt of any country and even then, 2nd place China is just about 3-4% of total US debt. 7. You have argued that ASPI couldn't be trusted because they may have been wrong (your opinion) on 2 facilities out of 400 so they can't be trusted HOWEVER if CCP is wrong on a facility and caught staging videos, they can still be trusted!! And you wonder why people would think you are a CCP shill. LOL. 8. You lied that you gave as a source on the debt ‘Statista’ when I in fact gave you such a source from them and it proved China is 2nd among foreign owned debt and only 3-4% of the total US debt. I gave you the title of the Statista article “Major foreign holders of US treasury” and another source from investopeida while you refuse to provide the title or even quotes from the article. 9. As another source, you used The Grayzone. Mediabaisfactcheck has them as untrustworthy and far left and said of them “A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis” 10. You trust more a g/f that doctors up a video making it looked like you went to a strip club than a g/f that said she believes you went 400 times to strip club but in actuality it was just 396 times you went. And you wonder why people think you are a CCP shill.
    2
  3219. 2
  3220. 2
  3221. @agapp11able 1. so no source on your lie that China has most of the US debt? 2. No specifics of what ASPI got wrong in their report documenting cccl staging videos? 3. You accept Chinese state media but you refuse to accept ASPI because it’s funded by Australian government? 4. You lied that the aspi report is only words and has not pics/videos 5. You lied that you gave a source on china holding majority of US debt And you are upset people call you a CCP shill? 6. I gave you directed sources supporting that Japan has the most US debt of any country and even then, 2nd place China is just about 3-4% of total US debt. 7. You have argued that ASPI couldn't be trusted because they may have been wrong (your opinion) on 2 facilities out of 400 so they can't be trusted HOWEVER if CCP is wrong on a facility and caught staging videos, they can still be trusted!! And you wonder why people would think you are a CCP shill. LOL. 8. You lied that you gave as a source on the debt ‘Statista’ when I in fact gave you such a source from them and it proved China is 2nd among foreign owned debt and only 3-4% of the total US debt. I gave you the title of the Statista article “Major foreign holders of US treasury” and another source from investopeida while you refuse to provide the title or even quotes from the article. 9. As another source, you used The Grayzone. Mediabaisfactcheck has them as untrustworthy and far left and said of them “A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis” 10. You trust more a g/f that doctors up a video making it looked like you went to a strip club than a g/f that said she believes you went 400 times to strip club but in actuality it was just 396 times you went. 11. You demand I answer over 20 questions (most already answered) of yours or else you consider me a bot while all I ask is you support your lies and hypocrisy or else you are a bot. And you wonder why people think you are a CCP shill.
    2
  3222. @agapp11able Oh, there was another person, Bob Carr. He isn't senator but is a left wing retired politician who served as Premier of New South Wales from 1995 to 2005. Funny about that -- The Financial Review of Australia has an article about him titled "How Bob Carr became China's pawn" - In times past, Carr was not known for promoting or defending China's Communist Party (CCP) government. To the contrary, as Clive Hamilton notes, he was at one time publicly critical of Australia's pro-China lobby, and denounced CCP ideology as a "ludicrously outdated notion". All this changed with his appointment to head the Australia China Relations Institute at the University of Technology in Sydney in 2014. Since then he has come to personify the lobby he once attacked, lauding the achievements of Xi Jinping and condemning his critics. - ACRI has provided Carr with the public platform he lost with the end of his brief tenure as foreign minister and again he has a strong media presence. - In China it is unlikely that any program organiser would turn down the opportunity of including Bob Carr. In a country where the UN Declaration counts for little, few can speak their minds, and none are permitted to criticise their own government, Carr's willingness to lambast Australia's government and applaud China's has made him a media darling. If freedom of speech is at issue, then the things Carr says in China deserve to be aired more widely in Australia. Fundamental issues are indeed at stake. - Within Australia Carr is now known for speaking up on Beijing's behalf and talking down criticism of China as a relic of Cold War thinking. There are many possible triggers for this. Examples would be infrastructure purchases, extradition treaties, university issues, political donations, media coverage and allegations of foreign interference, all topics on which Carr has taken to the airwaves or the print media. The pattern is consistent, with Carr denying problems on the Chinese side while simultaneously criticising Australians who see problems, on the other.
    2
  3223. 2
  3224. @agapp11able ​ 1. so no source on your lie that China has most of the US debt? 2. No specifics of what ASPI got wrong in their report documenting cccl staging videos? 3. You accept Chinese state media but you refuse to accept ASPI because it’s funded by Australian government? 4. You lied that the aspi report is only words and has not pics/videos 5. You lied that you gave a source on china holding majority of US debt And you are upset people call you a CCP shill? 6. I gave you directed sources supporting that Japan has the most US debt of any country and even then, 2nd place China is just about 3-4% of total US debt. 7. You have argued that ASPI couldn't be trusted because they may have been wrong (your opinion) on 2 facilities out of 400 so they can't be trusted HOWEVER if CCP is wrong on a facility and caught staging videos, they can still be trusted!! And you wonder why people would think you are a CCP shill. LOL. 8. You lied that you gave as a source on the debt ‘Statista’ when I in fact gave you such a source from them and it proved China is 2nd among foreign owned debt and only 3-4% of the total US debt. I gave you the title of the Statista article “Major foreign holders of US treasury” and another source from investopeida while you refuse to provide the title or even quotes from the article. 9. As another source, you used The Grayzone. Mediabaisfactcheck has them as untrustworthy and far left and said of them “A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis” 10. You trust more a g/f that doctors up a video making it looked like you went to a strip club than a g/f that said she believes you went 400 times to strip club but in actuality it was just 396 times you went. 11. You demand I answer over 20 questions (most already answered) of yours or else you consider me a bot while all I ask is you support your lies and hypocrisy or else you are a bot. And you wonder why people think you are a CCP shill.
    2
  3225. 2
  3226. 2
  3227. 2
  3228. 2
  3229. 2
  3230. 2
  3231. 2
  3232. 2
  3233. 2
  3234. 2
  3235. 2
  3236. 2
  3237. 2
  3238. 2
  3239. 2
  3240. 2
  3241. 2
  3242. 2
  3243. 2
  3244. 2
  3245. 2
  3246. 2
  3247. 2
  3248. 2
  3249. 2
  3250. 2
  3251. 2
  3252. 2
  3253. 2
  3254. 2
  3255. 2
  3256. 2
  3257. 2
  3258. 2
  3259. 2
  3260. 2
  3261. 2
  3262. 2
  3263. 2
  3264. 2
  3265. 2
  3266. 2
  3267. 2
  3268. 2
  3269. 2
  3270. 2
  3271. 2
  3272. 2
  3273. 2
  3274. 2
  3275. 2
  3276. 2
  3277. 2
  3278. 2
  3279. 2
  3280. 2
  3281. 2
  3282. 2
  3283. 2
  3284. 2
  3285. 2
  3286. 2
  3287. 2
  3288. 2
  3289. 2
  3290. 2
  3291. 2
  3292. 2
  3293. 2
  3294. 2
  3295. 2
  3296. 2
  3297. 2
  3298. 2
  3299. 2
  3300. 2
  3301. 2
  3302. 2
  3303. 2
  3304. 2
  3305. 2
  3306. 2
  3307. 2
  3308. 2
  3309. 2
  3310. 2
  3311. 2
  3312. 2
  3313. 2
  3314. 2
  3315. 2
  3316. 2
  3317. 2
  3318. 2
  3319. 2
  3320. 2
  3321. 2
  3322. 2
  3323. 2
  3324. 2
  3325. 2
  3326. 2
  3327. 2
  3328. 2
  3329. 2
  3330. 2
  3331. 2
  3332. 2
  3333. 2
  3334. 2
  3335. 2
  3336. 2
  3337. 2
  3338. 2
  3339. 2
  3340. 2
  3341. 2
  3342. 2
  3343. 2
  3344. 2
  3345. 2
  3346. 2
  3347. 2
  3348. 2
  3349. 2
  3350. 2
  3351. 2
  3352. 2
  3353. 2
  3354. 2
  3355. 2
  3356. 2
  3357. 2
  3358. 2
  3359. 2
  3360. 2
  3361. 2
  3362. 2
  3363. 2
  3364. 2
  3365. 2
  3366. 2
  3367. 2
  3368. 2
  3369. 2
  3370. 2
  3371. 2
  3372. 2
  3373. 2
  3374. 2
  3375. 2
  3376. 2
  3377. 2
  3378. 2
  3379. 2
  3380. 2
  3381. 2
  3382. 2
  3383. 2
  3384. 2
  3385. 2
  3386. 2
  3387. 2
  3388. 2
  3389. 2
  3390. 2
  3391. 2
  3392. 2
  3393. 2
  3394. 2
  3395. 2
  3396. 2
  3397. 2
  3398. 2
  3399. 2
  3400. 2
  3401. 2
  3402. 2
  3403. 2
  3404. 2
  3405. 2
  3406. 2
  3407. 2
  3408. 2
  3409. 2
  3410. 2
  3411. 2
  3412. 2
  3413. 2
  3414. 2
  3415. 2
  3416. 2
  3417. 2
  3418. 2
  3419. 2
  3420. 2
  3421. 2
  3422. 2
  3423. 2
  3424. 2
  3425. 2
  3426. 2
  3427. 2
  3428. 2
  3429. 2
  3430. 2
  3431. 2
  3432. 2
  3433. 2
  3434. 2
  3435. 2
  3436. 2
  3437. 2
  3438. 2
  3439. 2
  3440. 2
  3441. 2
  3442. 2
  3443. 2
  3444. 2
  3445. 2
  3446. 2
  3447. 2
  3448. 2
  3449. 2
  3450. 2
  3451. 2
  3452. 2
  3453. 2
  3454. 2
  3455. 2
  3456. 2
  3457. 2
  3458. 2
  3459. 2
  3460. 2
  3461. 2
  3462. 2
  3463. 2
  3464. 2
  3465. 2
  3466. 2
  3467. 2
  3468. 2
  3469. 2
  3470. 2
  3471. 2
  3472. 2
  3473. 2
  3474. 2
  3475. 2
  3476. 2
  3477. 2
  3478. 2
  3479. 2
  3480. 2
  3481. 2
  3482. 2
  3483. 2
  3484. 2
  3485. 2
  3486. 2
  3487. 2
  3488. 2
  3489. 2
  3490. 2
  3491. 2
  3492. 2
  3493. 2
  3494. 2
  3495. 2
  3496. 2
  3497. 2
  3498. 2
  3499. 2
  3500. 2
  3501. 2
  3502. 2
  3503. 2
  3504. 2
  3505. 2
  3506. 2
  3507. 2
  3508. 2
  3509. 2
  3510. 2
  3511. 2
  3512. 2
  3513. 2
  3514. 2
  3515. 2
  3516. 2
  3517. 2
  3518. 2
  3519. 2
  3520. 2
  3521. 2
  3522. 2
  3523. 2
  3524. 2
  3525. 2
  3526. 2
  3527. 2
  3528. 2
  3529. 2
  3530. 2
  3531. 2
  3532.  @ykokog1813  "say that only Korean nationalism and political judgment are the cause of the conflict." Good thing I didn't say that. I even acknowledged the mistakes some Japanese officials have made. What I have argued is that South Korea is using this as a political football and therefore never really going to accept an apology as long as they using it as a political football. "For Korea, Japan is a military alliance connected through the United States, but it is perceived as a potential threat" That would be an unfounded threat. >and that there is only a history of military dismal with Japan for five centuries. France, Germany and UK fought so many wars with each other and France/UK fought two horrible wars in the 20th century...yet a few decades later, they were all close friends. And France and UK have been close friends (with ups and downs) since Napoleon was removed. >here is a worship facility called The Seven Men's Cemetery A facility with almost no trace of it online? seems like it's not a popular thing and just a few random people even visit it let alone worship it. The google reviews even mention how hard it is to get to. One review said "I'm surprised so many people don't know about it. Originally, I think that it is a history and a place that should be taught in schools. In order not to repeat the sad history." So it's not a well known facility. Another said "The road to get there was bad and unmaintained. I finally got to the toll road and managed to run normally." So it's in a very remote area with rough roads. If you're going to refuse to accept Japan's apologies because of small sort of hidden burial site of war criminals hanged exist at all then you are just looking for reasons to not accept Japan's apologies.
    2
  3533. 2
  3534. 2
  3535. 2
  3536. 2
  3537. 2
  3538. 2
  3539. 2
  3540. 2
  3541. 2
  3542. 2
  3543. 2
  3544. 2
  3545. 2
  3546. 2
  3547. 2
  3548. 2
  3549. 2
  3550. 2
  3551. 2
  3552. 2
  3553. 2
  3554. 2
  3555.  @felchap1205  https://revista.drclas.harvard.edu/book/chile-lonely-success-story FTA: It should be remembered that Chile was a pioneer in Latin America’s experiment with radical market reforms. Indeed, General Augusto Pinochet’s September 1973 coup against the democratically elected government of Dr. Salvador Allende and the subsequent military regime that lasted until 1989 had as a consequence the demise of the old development model based on the state’s active interventions in the economy. Instead, the dictatorship favored market mechanisms and private competition as the key agents of capital formation and production decisions. The economic rationale for such change, independently of its political motivation, was clear. The state’s intervention in the economy was perceived as a fundamental distortion in the allocation of resources, thus provoking high indebtedness and inflation. Applying this new strategy, by the mid 1970s, Chile began to undertake key reforms: eliminating import controls, unilaterally bringing down import tariffs to a common level of 10%, opening financial markets to foreign competition, reducing the public sector and eliminating many government controls on economic activity that had become standard practice. In 1976 Chile withdrew from the Andean pact, at the time a regional organization was marked by protectionism and its adverse view of foreign direct investment (FDI). But the results of this first attempt at macroeconomic reform were far from favorable. Crucial errors in financial liberalization in the absence of adequate bank regulation coupled with a fall in the international price of copper and a sudden halt in foreign lending. The Chilean economy was pushed to an acute crisis in 1982-83, leading to the bankruptcy of the private banking sector and its nationalization. The authorities responded by implementing a conventional economic stabilization package to control inflation, relying more on a flexible exchange rate and a rise in import tariffs to face foreign sector disequilibria. The process of structural reforms lost impetus for some time. However, in 1985, structural reforms once again began to be profoundly implemented. Trade liberalization was again pushed forward, independence was awarded to the Central Bank, a new regulatory framework for the banking sector was adopted and privatization of public enterprises was accelerated.
    2
  3556. 2
  3557. 2
  3558. 2
  3559. 2
  3560. 2
  3561. 2
  3562. 2
  3563.  @felchap1205  Go ahead and let me know if the below is wrong. Is the follwing not true: 1. reduce tariffs? 2. Where there free market reforms? 3. Privatization of many industries? These are but 3 of the foundations they made. But you're a dishonest POS who keeps refusing to admit that these foundations were created under Pinchet. https://www.hoover.org/research/what-pinochet-did-chile - It has become fashionable in some quarters lately to claim that Chile’s successful record of economic development in recent decades actually began in 1990, during the first civilian government since 1973. That claim is false. The historical record is clear. President Pinochet and his civilian advisers, after an elaborate and lengthy process of deliberation and decision making in 1973–1975, in which various alternative courses of action were considered, put in place the radically new set of market-oriented structures and policies that have been and remain the foundations of Chile’s subsequent three decades of economic and social development. This new model, which we call social capitalism, was adjusted, revised, and supplemented during the Pinochet years, most importantly in response to an economic crisis in the early 1980s and also in the post-1990 civilian years. https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6069233 - But that brutal dictatorship also laid the foundation for Chile's remarkable growth. Pinochet forced open the economy under the guiding hand of a group known as the "Chicago Boys," disciples of Milton Friedman, a free-market advocate and University of Chicago economist. - "And the model was imposed in the most ruthless imaginable way," says analyst Raul Sohr. "Eventually, it did work, and it does work ... Ever since Chile returned to democracy, a number of free-trade agreements have been signed. Exports have grown exponentially. Last year was the best year in Chilean economic history," Sohr says
    2
  3564.  @felchap1205  Go ahead and let me know if the below is wrong. Is the follwing not true: 1. reduce tariffs? 2. Where there free market reforms? 3. Privatization of many industries? These are but 3 of the foundations they made. But you're a dishonest person who keeps refusing to admit that these foundations were created under Pinchet. https://www.hoover.org/research/what-pinochet-did-chile - It has become fashionable in some quarters lately to claim that Chile’s successful record of economic development in recent decades actually began in 1990, during the first civilian government since 1973. That claim is false. The historical record is clear. President Pinochet and his civilian advisers, after an elaborate and lengthy process of deliberation and decision making in 1973–1975, in which various alternative courses of action were considered, put in place the radically new set of market-oriented structures and policies that have been and remain the foundations of Chile’s subsequent three decades of economic and social development. This new model, which we call social capitalism, was adjusted, revised, and supplemented during the Pinochet years, most importantly in response to an economic crisis in the early 1980s and also in the post-1990 civilian years. https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6069233 - But that brutal dictatorship also laid the foundation for Chile's remarkable growth. Pinochet forced open the economy under the guiding hand of a group known as the "Chicago Boys," disciples of Milton Friedman, a free-market advocate and University of Chicago economist. - "And the model was imposed in the most ruthless imaginable way," says analyst Raul Sohr. "Eventually, it did work, and it does work ... Ever since Chile returned to democracy, a number of free-trade agreements have been signed. Exports have grown exponentially. Last year was the best year in Chilean economic history," Sohr says
    2
  3565. 2
  3566. 2
  3567. 2
  3568. 2
  3569. 2
  3570. 2
  3571. 2
  3572. 2
  3573. 2
  3574. 2
  3575. 2
  3576. 2
  3577. 2
  3578. 2
  3579. 2
  3580. 2
  3581. 2
  3582. 2
  3583. 2
  3584. 2
  3585. 2
  3586. 2
  3587. 2
  3588. 2
  3589. 11 months later and 9 months after the invasion (it’s Dec 2022 as I write this). Interesting to hear what was commonly believed by geopolitical experts. It appears the sanctions against Russia where much more severe than originally thought nearly a year ago. The Russian army turned out to ineffective with serious logistical issues and low moral. Ukraine army turned out to be much better than thought helped in large part with some powerful western weapons which have become increasingly more powerful — HIMARS in the summer was a game changer and now Ukraine will get the Patriot missile defense to protect its cities. The war is now slowly moving but Russia is losing little by little at this point and not sure they can turn it around. The best hope for Russia is to drag this war out as long as possible and hope the west caves and forces Ukraine to negotiate with Russia but given how Russian troops have low moral, high casualties, and lacking supplies — it’s likely Ukraine will keep on fighting and if they cut Russian occupied territory in half with what appears to be their latest move going through the center, it’s very possible the western part of Russian occupied Ukraine will be tough to hold on to for long. I see this war this going back to 2021 borders in the too long future. Will Ukraine keep fighting beyond that to take Donbas and Crimea? Seems like Crimea might be east to take if they cut Russians occupied lands in half but Donbas might end up being part of a negotiation.
    2
  3590.  @JamesKerLindsay  I appreciate the feedback and you make some great points. In regards to going back to 2021 borders I was mostly speaking about the military difficulties of Ukraine taking Donbas back. If Ukraine splits the Russian occupied lands in half, they can easily take the western half including Crimea. however the Donbas bordering Russia would be easy to keep supplying, and Putin will have no problems throwing as many bodies as he needs to defend the eastern part of the territory. Ukraine will have to take and absurdly amount of casualties to take the Donbas or they will need to fight a very long several year war in the east. The latter might be determined by whether the west will continue to supply Ukraine for three or four or five more years. Will the west continue to provide such support for that long? Well, you Made a point I never thought of which would suggest the west will help so long as Ukraine is wanting support….many now that the integrity of the international system relies on defeating his land grab. A land grab we haven’t seen since maybe 1991 Iraq invasion of Kuwait and that was for a much smaller land. Plus the severe level of the war crimes just gives even more motivation for the west to keep up the support. With the ever increasing weapons that Ukraine is receiving (18 more HIMARS approved, Patriot missile defense system, and likely some new weapons not yet made available to Ukraine), Russia being isolated and seeing negative annual gdp growth for the foreseeable future, europe decoupling from Russia, and low troop morale for Russia but high troop morale for Ukraine, it seems that Russia can be driven out of Ukraine so long as the western support for Ukraine holds. And I thought this war would be over in a week after it started.
    2
  3591.  @theotherohlourdespadua1131  June 22, 1965: Minister of Foreign Affairs Shiina Etsusaburo said to the people of South Korea: "In our two countries' long history there have been unfortunate times, it is truly regrettable and we are deeply remorseful" (Signing of the Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and South Korea). August 26, 1982: Chief Cabinet Secretary Kiichi Miyazawa said to the people of the Republic of Korea: "1. The Japanese Government and the Japanese people are deeply aware of the fact that acts by our country in the past caused tremendous suffering and damage to the peoples of Asian countries, including the Republic of Korea (ROK) and China, and have followed the path of a pacifist state with remorse and determination that such acts must never be repeated. Japan has recognized, in the Japan-ROK Joint Communique, of 1965, that the 'past relations are regrettable, and Japan feels deep remorse,' and in the Japan-China Joint Communique, that Japan is 'keenly conscious of the responsibility for the serious damage that Japan caused in the past to the Chinese people through war and deeply reproaches itself.' These statements confirm Japan's remorse and determination which I stated above and this recognition has not changed at all to this day. 2. This spirit in the Japan-ROK Joint Communique, and the Japan-China Joint Communique, naturally should also be respected in Japan's school education and textbook authorization. 1989: Prime Minister Takeshita Noboru, in a speech in the Japanese Diet, said: "As we have made clear previously at repeated opportunities, the Japanese government and the Japanese people are deeply conscious of the fact that the actions of our country in the past caused suffering and loss to many people in neighboring countries. Starting from our regret and resolve not to repeat such things a second time, we have followed a course as a "Peace Nation" since then. This awareness and regret should be emphasized especially in the relationship between our countries and the Korean Peninsula, our nearest neighbors both geographically and historically. At this opportunity, as we face a new situation in the Korean Peninsula, again, to all peoples of the globe, concerning the relationship of the past, we want to express our deep regret and sorrow"
    2
  3592. 2
  3593. 2
  3594. 2
  3595. 2
  3596. 2
  3597. 2
  3598. 2
  3599. 2
  3600. 2
  3601. 2
  3602. 2
  3603. 2
  3604. 2
  3605. 2
  3606. 2
  3607. 2
  3608. 2
  3609. 2
  3610. 2
  3611. 2
  3612. 2
  3613. 2
  3614. 2
  3615. 2
  3616. 2
  3617. 2
  3618. 2
  3619. 2
  3620. 2
  3621. 2
  3622. 2
  3623. 2
  3624. 2
  3625. 2
  3626. 2
  3627. 2
  3628. 2
  3629. 2
  3630. 2
  3631. 2
  3632. 2
  3633. 2
  3634. 2
  3635. 2
  3636. 2
  3637. 2
  3638. 2
  3639. 2
  3640. 2
  3641. 2
  3642. 2
  3643. 2
  3644. 2
  3645. 2
  3646. 2
  3647. 2
  3648. 2
  3649. 2
  3650. 2
  3651. 2
  3652. 2
  3653. 2
  3654. 2
  3655. 2
  3656. 2
  3657. 2
  3658. 2
  3659. 2
  3660. 2
  3661. 2
  3662. 2
  3663. 2
  3664. 2
  3665. 2
  3666. 2
  3667. 2
  3668. 2
  3669. 2
  3670. 2
  3671. 2
  3672. 2
  3673. 2
  3674. 2
  3675. 2
  3676. 2
  3677. 2
  3678. 2
  3679. 2
  3680. 2
  3681. 2
  3682. 2
  3683. 2
  3684. 2
  3685. 2
  3686. 2
  3687. 2
  3688. 2
  3689. 2
  3690. 2
  3691. 2
  3692. 2
  3693. 2
  3694. 2
  3695. 2
  3696. 2
  3697. 2
  3698. 2
  3699. 2
  3700. 2
  3701. 2
  3702. 2
  3703. 2
  3704. 2
  3705. 2
  3706. 2
  3707. 2
  3708. 2
  3709. 2
  3710. 2
  3711. 2
  3712. 2
  3713. 2
  3714. 2
  3715. 2
  3716. 2
  3717. 2
  3718. 2
  3719. 2
  3720. 2
  3721. 2
  3722. 2
  3723. 2
  3724. 2
  3725. 2
  3726. 2
  3727. 2
  3728. 2
  3729. 2
  3730. 2
  3731. 2
  3732. 2
  3733. 2
  3734. 2
  3735. 2
  3736. 2
  3737. 2
  3738. 2
  3739. 2
  3740. 2
  3741. 2
  3742. 2
  3743. 2
  3744. 2
  3745. 2
  3746. 2
  3747. 2
  3748. 2
  3749. 2
  3750. 2
  3751. 2
  3752. 2
  3753. 2
  3754. 2
  3755. 2
  3756. 2
  3757. 2
  3758. 2
  3759. 2
  3760. 2
  3761. 2
  3762. 2
  3763. 2
  3764. 2
  3765. 2
  3766. 2
  3767. 2
  3768. 2
  3769. 2
  3770. 2
  3771. 2
  3772. 2
  3773. 2
  3774. 2
  3775. 2
  3776. 2
  3777. 2
  3778. 2
  3779. 2
  3780. 2
  3781. 2
  3782. 2
  3783. 2
  3784. 2
  3785. 2
  3786. 2
  3787. 2
  3788. 2
  3789. 2
  3790. 2
  3791. 2
  3792. 2
  3793. 2
  3794. 2
  3795. 2
  3796. 2
  3797. 2
  3798. 2
  3799. 2
  3800. 2
  3801. 2
  3802. 2
  3803. 2
  3804. 2
  3805. 2
  3806. 2
  3807. 2
  3808. 2
  3809. 2
  3810. 2
  3811. 2
  3812. 2
  3813. 2
  3814. 2
  3815. 2
  3816. 2
  3817. 2
  3818. 2
  3819. 2
  3820. 2
  3821. 2
  3822. 2
  3823. 2
  3824. 2
  3825. 2
  3826. 2
  3827. 2
  3828. 2
  3829. 2
  3830. 2
  3831. 2
  3832. 2
  3833. 2
  3834. 2
  3835. 2
  3836. 2
  3837. 2
  3838. 2
  3839. 2
  3840. 2
  3841. 2
  3842. 2
  3843. 2
  3844. 2
  3845. 2
  3846. 2
  3847. 2
  3848. 2
  3849. 2
  3850. 2
  3851. 2
  3852. 2
  3853. 2
  3854. 2
  3855. 2
  3856. 2
  3857. 2
  3858. 2
  3859. 2
  3860. 2
  3861. 2
  3862. 2
  3863. 2
  3864. 2
  3865. 2
  3866. 2
  3867. 2
  3868. 2
  3869. 2
  3870. 2
  3871. 2
  3872. 2
  3873. 2
  3874. 2
  3875. 2
  3876. 2
  3877. 2
  3878. 2
  3879. 2
  3880. 2
  3881. 2
  3882. 2
  3883. 2
  3884. 2
  3885. 2
  3886. 2
  3887. 2
  3888. 2
  3889. 2
  3890. 2
  3891. 2
  3892. 2
  3893. 2
  3894. 2
  3895. 2
  3896. 2
  3897. 2
  3898. 2
  3899. @Zaydan Alfariz you are right, overregulation in the US regarding transit contraction is a problem. whiteerdydude wants to believe that expanding a road is more expensive than building a new train line in a city/metro but the data shows it's much cheaper to expand the road. The US costs even for labor is more expensive than Europe in construction but adding the costs is the US over regulations on construction that add a lot of cost. Some of it is requiring lots of research on various possible problems with building a train line that will increase the costs. Some if it is the difficult of eminent domain in the US leaving many plans to have to go with tunnels/subways or go with elevated tracks. There are indeed less regulation on cars and construction of roads than trainlines. There's also the false argument of comparing building a new train line to building a new highway. No, new highways or roads are rarely the competition for a new train line. The roads are already built decades ago. The competition is expanding an existing road and this is often more easily because there is usually more space to the side of the highway to expand. I do wish that more US cities consider middle ground option -- either rapid bus transit or a tram (trolley/streetcar). The tram is more for in the city but a great way to connect some neighborhoods in the city to busy areas of the city. Rapid bus can be used the same as trams for local travel but can also be used to go into the suburbs. Many cities have some limited rapid bus from suburbs to city but should e expanded. It works by making one lane dedicated to the rapid bus. For local, it often requires removing parking on the street and only allowing the bus or cars that are turning. From suburbs to city, it usually requires one lane in the highway to be available only for the bus. Instead of building a new highway lane, they usually modify the shoulder to allow the rapid bus to use it. So it can go 55mph during rush hour the length of the highway route.
    2
  3900. 2
  3901. 2
  3902. 2
  3903. 2
  3904. 2
  3905. 2
  3906. 2
  3907. 2
  3908. 2
  3909. 2
  3910. 2
  3911. 2
  3912. 2
  3913. 2
  3914. 2
  3915. 2
  3916. 2
  3917. 2
  3918. 2
  3919. 2
  3920. 2
  3921. 2
  3922. 2
  3923. 2
  3924. 2
  3925. 2
  3926. 2
  3927. 2
  3928. 2
  3929. 2
  3930. 2
  3931. 2
  3932. 2
  3933. 2
  3934. 2
  3935. 2
  3936. 2
  3937. 2
  3938. 2
  3939. 2
  3940. 2
  3941. 2
  3942. 2
  3943. 2
  3944. 2
  3945. 2
  3946. 2
  3947. 2
  3948. 2
  3949. 2
  3950. 2
  3951. 2
  3952. 2
  3953. 2
  3954. 2
  3955. 2
  3956. 2
  3957. 2
  3958. 2
  3959. 2
  3960. 2
  3961. 2
  3962. 2
  3963. 2
  3964. 2
  3965. 2
  3966. 2
  3967. 2
  3968. 2
  3969. 2
  3970. 2
  3971. 2
  3972. 2
  3973. 2
  3974. 2
  3975. 2
  3976. 2
  3977. 2
  3978. 2
  3979. 2
  3980. 2
  3981. 2
  3982. 2
  3983. 2
  3984. 2
  3985. 2
  3986. 2
  3987. 2
  3988. 2
  3989. 2
  3990. 2
  3991. 2
  3992. 2
  3993. 2
  3994. 2
  3995. 2
  3996. 2
  3997. 2
  3998. 2
  3999. 2
  4000. 2
  4001. 2
  4002. 2
  4003. 2
  4004. 2
  4005. 2
  4006. 2
  4007. 2
  4008. 2
  4009. 2
  4010. 2
  4011. 2
  4012. 2
  4013. 2
  4014. 2
  4015. 2
  4016. 2
  4017. 2
  4018. 2
  4019. 2
  4020. 2
  4021. 2
  4022. 2
  4023. 2
  4024. 2
  4025. 2
  4026. 2
  4027. 2
  4028. 2
  4029. 2
  4030. 2
  4031. 2
  4032. 2
  4033. 2
  4034. 2
  4035. 2
  4036. 2
  4037. 2
  4038. 2
  4039. 2
  4040. 2
  4041. 2
  4042. 2
  4043. 2
  4044. 2
  4045. 2
  4046. 2
  4047. 2
  4048. 2
  4049. 2
  4050. 2
  4051. 2
  4052. 2
  4053. 2
  4054. 2
  4055. 2
  4056. 2
  4057. 2
  4058. 2
  4059. 2
  4060. 2
  4061. 2
  4062. 2
  4063. 2
  4064. 2
  4065. 2
  4066. 2
  4067. 2
  4068. 2
  4069. 2
  4070. 2
  4071. 2
  4072. 2
  4073. 2
  4074. 2
  4075. 2
  4076. 2
  4077. 2
  4078. 2
  4079. 2
  4080. 2
  4081. 2
  4082. 2
  4083. 2
  4084. 2
  4085. 2
  4086. 2
  4087. 2
  4088. 2
  4089. 2
  4090. 2
  4091. 2
  4092. 2
  4093. 2
  4094. 2
  4095. 2
  4096. 2
  4097. 2
  4098. 2
  4099. 2
  4100. 2
  4101. 2
  4102. 2
  4103. 2
  4104. 2
  4105. 2
  4106. 2
  4107. 2
  4108. 2
  4109. 2
  4110. 2
  4111. 2
  4112. 2
  4113. 2
  4114. 2
  4115. 2
  4116. 2
  4117. 2
  4118. 2
  4119. 2
  4120. 2
  4121. 2
  4122. 2
  4123. 2
  4124. 2
  4125. 2
  4126. 2
  4127. 2
  4128. 2
  4129. 2
  4130. 2
  4131. 2
  4132. 2
  4133. 2
  4134. 2
  4135. 2
  4136. 2
  4137. 2
  4138. 2
  4139. 2
  4140. 2
  4141. 2
  4142. 2
  4143. 2
  4144. 2
  4145. 2
  4146. 2
  4147. 2
  4148. 2
  4149. 2
  4150. 2
  4151. 2
  4152. 2
  4153. 2
  4154. 2
  4155. 2
  4156. 2
  4157. 2
  4158. 2
  4159. 2
  4160. 2
  4161. 2
  4162. 2
  4163. 2
  4164. 2
  4165. 2
  4166. 2
  4167. 2
  4168. 2
  4169. 2
  4170. 2
  4171. 2
  4172. 2
  4173. 2
  4174. 2
  4175. 2
  4176. 2
  4177. 2
  4178. 2
  4179. 2
  4180. 2
  4181. 2
  4182. 2
  4183. 2
  4184. 2
  4185. 2
  4186. 2
  4187. 2
  4188. 2
  4189. 2
  4190. 2
  4191. 2
  4192. 2
  4193. 2
  4194. 2
  4195. 2
  4196. 2
  4197. 2
  4198. 2
  4199. 2
  4200. 2
  4201. 2
  4202. 2
  4203. 2
  4204. 2
  4205. 2
  4206. 2
  4207. 2
  4208. 2
  4209. 2
  4210. 2
  4211. 2
  4212. 2
  4213. 2
  4214. 2
  4215. 2
  4216. 2
  4217. 2
  4218. 2
  4219. 2
  4220. 2
  4221. 2
  4222. 2
  4223. 2
  4224. 2
  4225. 2
  4226. 2
  4227. 2
  4228. 2
  4229. 2
  4230. 2
  4231. 2
  4232. 2
  4233. 2
  4234. 2
  4235. 2
  4236. 2
  4237. 2
  4238. 2
  4239. 2
  4240. 2
  4241. 2
  4242. 2
  4243. 2
  4244. 2
  4245. 2
  4246. 2
  4247. 2
  4248. 2
  4249. 2
  4250. 2
  4251. 2
  4252. 2
  4253. 1
  4254. 1
  4255. 1
  4256. 1
  4257. 1
  4258. 1
  4259. 1
  4260. 1
  4261. 1
  4262. 1
  4263. 1
  4264. 1
  4265. 1
  4266. 1
  4267. 1
  4268. 1
  4269. 1
  4270. 1
  4271. 1
  4272. 1
  4273. 1
  4274. 1
  4275. 1
  4276. 1
  4277. 1
  4278. 1
  4279. 1
  4280. 1
  4281. 1
  4282. 1
  4283. 1
  4284. 1
  4285. 1
  4286. 1
  4287. 1
  4288. 1
  4289. 1
  4290. 1
  4291. 1
  4292. 1
  4293. 1
  4294. 1
  4295. 1
  4296. 1
  4297. 1
  4298. 1
  4299. 1
  4300. 1
  4301. 1
  4302. 1
  4303. 1
  4304. 1
  4305. 1
  4306. 1
  4307. 1
  4308. 1
  4309. 1
  4310. 1
  4311. 1
  4312. 1
  4313. 1
  4314. 1
  4315. 1
  4316. 1
  4317. 1
  4318. 1
  4319. 1
  4320. 1
  4321. 1
  4322. 1
  4323. 1
  4324. 1
  4325. 1
  4326. 1
  4327. 1
  4328. 1
  4329. 1
  4330. 1
  4331. 1
  4332. 1
  4333. 1
  4334. 1
  4335. 1
  4336. 1
  4337. 1
  4338. 1
  4339. 1
  4340. 1
  4341. 1
  4342. 1
  4343. 1
  4344. 1
  4345. 1
  4346. 1
  4347. 1
  4348. 1
  4349. 1
  4350. 1
  4351. 1
  4352. 1
  4353. 1
  4354. 1
  4355. 1
  4356. 1
  4357. 1
  4358. 1
  4359. 1
  4360. 1
  4361. 1
  4362. 1
  4363. 1
  4364. 1
  4365. 1
  4366. 1
  4367. 1
  4368. 1
  4369. 1
  4370. 1
  4371. 1
  4372. 1
  4373. 1
  4374. 1
  4375. 1
  4376. 1
  4377. 1
  4378. 1
  4379. 1
  4380. 1
  4381. 1
  4382. 1
  4383. 1
  4384. 1
  4385. 1
  4386. 1
  4387. 1
  4388. 1
  4389. 1
  4390. 1
  4391. 1
  4392. 1
  4393. 1
  4394. 1
  4395. 1
  4396. 1
  4397. 1
  4398. 1
  4399. 1
  4400. 1
  4401. 1
  4402. 1
  4403. 1
  4404. 1
  4405. 1
  4406. 1
  4407. 1
  4408. 1
  4409. 1
  4410. 1
  4411. 1
  4412. 1
  4413. ​@agapp11able ​ Bascially, these are the points: 1. You only trust the CCP and will not accept anything from any western country be it an humanatarian orginization or legit news org. However, you will accept anything that is from China or supports China. 2.. Aspi identified likely camps and you said they are just schools and drug rehab facilities. You have refused to actually provide a source.. You just consistently saying there are didn’t make it true. Give a source 3. You pointed to the Pichan Facility #4 and said that it's not a detenton facility simply for being near apartments even though the CCP has allowed BBC to visit a low security camp and it was near apartment buildings. In the same video, the bbc attempted to go to another facility in town which was also near apartments but the CCP officials kicked out the BBC from the area and stopped them from filming. 4. ASPI said they identified 380+ very likely facilities. You have only been able to directly point to one and your assumptions on it are wrong (see #3) but yet even if that wasn't a camp, you believe that if you find one facility they were wrong with it means they are wrong with all the remaining 380ish. 5. . Asked to make major criticism of the CCP that the CCP hasn’t already acknowledged --- All you did was say “they banned private tutors and healthcare isn’t universal”. You are unable to Give a serious criticism 6. Lied that I said that all 12 million Muslims in Xinjiang were sent to the camps. Me saying 12 million Muslims in Xinjiang doesn’t mean I’m saying all 12 million are or were in camps. 7. Said that Corporations never lie that they use forced labor or sweat shop labor and also argued that since Skechers said their two facilities in China didn't have forced labor, it means China doesn't have any forced labor. 8. Lied and that ASPI had said that there are two million in the camps at this exact moment. Unable to provide a source.
    1
  4414. 1
  4415. 1
  4416. 1
  4417. 1
  4418. 1
  4419. 1
  4420. 1
  4421. 1
  4422. 1
  4423. 1
  4424. 1
  4425. @agapp11able WUMAO, ASPI has a great article on how China often tries to lie and use propaganda videos which wumaos like you then use to say "see, no detention facility of Uyghurs!". And you have literally just done -- you posted a CCP news video as your source with much of the same practices. Article: - Last month, Global Times editor Hu Xijin visited what he referred to as a ‘vocational training center’ in Kashgar. He posted a two-minute video of the trip on his Twitter account - But by July 2017, when construction was complete, every ‘school’ building in the southwest of the facility (previously Middle School No. 5) was surrounded by tall fencing that had been painted green and topped with razor wire. By August, much of School No. 6 was enclosed with similar fencing. Upon completion in around November 2017, School No. 4 was also highly securitised and a tender was released calling for bidders to oversee and install new equipment, including a new surveillance camera system - The video posted by Hu Xijin of Middle School No. 4 on 24 October shows detainees dancing and playing table-tennis and basketball. However, this visit—and the footage shared on social media—may not reflect the regular daily experiences of the detainees. - Through satellite and imagery analysis—including imagery updated daily—we can determine that these courts are coloured mats that are recent additions to the camp. The mats were placed on a concrete-covered area that is normally bare and appears inaccessible to detainees. - Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October - Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October
    1
  4426. @agapp11able @agapp11able Bascially, these are the points: 1. You only trust the CCP and will not accept anything from any western country be it an humanatarian orginization or legit news org. However, you will accept anything that is from China or supports China. 2.. Aspi identified likely camps and you said they are just schools and drug rehab facilities. You have refused to actually provide a source.. You just consistently saying there are didn’t make it true. Give a source 3. You pointed to the Pichan Facility #4 and said that it's not a detenton facility simply for being near apartments even though the CCP has allowed BBC to visit a low security camp and it was near apartment buildings. In the same video, the bbc attempted to go to another facility in town which was also near apartments but the CCP officials kicked out the BBC from the area and stopped them from filming. 4. ASPI said they identified 380+ very likely facilities. You have only been able to directly point to one and your assumptions on it are wrong (see #3) but yet even if that wasn't a camp, you believe that if you find one facility they were wrong with it means they are wrong with all the remaining 380ish. ASPI has two ratings – ‘likely’ and ‘confirmed’. Even if one or two are wrong, it does not mean that most of the rest are wrong. If they were, why don’t you have evidence on all 380 but instead try to claim about 3 or 4 are wrong? 5. . Asked to make major criticism of the CCP that the CCP hasn’t already acknowledged --- All you did was say “they banned private tutors and healthcare isn’t universal”. You are unable to Give a serious criticism 6. Lied that I said that all 12 million Muslims in Xinjiang were sent to the camps. Me saying 12 million Muslims in Xinjiang doesn’t mean I’m saying all 12 million are or were in camps. 7. Said that Corporations never lie that they use forced labor or sweat shop labor and also argued that since Skechers said their two facilities in China didn't have forced labor, it means China doesn't have any forced labor. 8. Lied and that ASPI had said that there are two million in the camps at this exact moment. Unable to provide a source. 9. Lied that Amnesty International with funded by the CIA with CIA money. It was actually founded by Peter Benenson and Eric Baker and it does not accept donations from governments or governmental organizations. 10. Lied that ASPI funding from Australian governments is only 37%. 11. You literally used CCP 100% controlled news as your sources while you reject anything from the west for whatever reason you can think of. 12. You said that Marlabashi Detention center no 1 was in fact a school. Because the Chinese state media source you used cut to a classroom that could be located anywhere. If it was just a school, there would be tons of videos of the school being a school. Kids getting out of class, playing inside those walls, etc. But you won’t provide any such video and just belive the CCP when they say the classroom they showed was indeed inside the facility.
    1
  4427. 1
  4428. 1
  4429. 1
  4430. 1
  4431. 1
  4432. 1
  4433. @agapp11able WUMAO, ASPI has a great article on how China often tries to lie and use propaganda videos which wumaos like you then use to say "see, no detention facility of Uyghurs!" - Last month, Global Times editor Hu Xijin visited what he referred to as a ‘vocational training center’ in Kashgar. He posted a two-minute video of the trip on his Twitter account - But by July 2017, when construction was complete, every ‘school’ building in the southwest of the facility (previously Middle School No. 5) was surrounded by tall fencing that had been painted green and topped with razor wire. By August, much of School No. 6 was enclosed with similar fencing. Upon completion in around November 2017, School No. 4 was also highly securitised and a tender was released calling for bidders to oversee and install new equipment, including a new surveillance camera system - The video posted by Hu Xijin of Middle School No. 4 on 24 October shows detainees dancing and playing table-tennis and basketball. However, this visit—and the footage shared on social media—may not reflect the regular daily experiences of the detainees. - Through satellite and imagery analysis—including imagery updated daily—we can determine that these courts are coloured mats that are recent additions to the camp. The mats were placed on a concrete-covered area that is normally bare and appears inaccessible to detainees. - Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October - Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October
    1
  4434. 1
  4435.  @zer0hero95  WUMAO, ASPI has a great article on how China often tries to lie and use propaganda videos which wumaos like you then use to say "see, no detention facility of Uyghurs!" - Last month, Global Times editor Hu Xijin visited what he referred to as a ‘vocational training center’ in Kashgar. He posted a two-minute video of the trip on his Twitter account - But by July 2017, when construction was complete, every ‘school’ building in the southwest of the facility (previously Middle School No. 5) was surrounded by tall fencing that had been painted green and topped with razor wire. By August, much of School No. 6 was enclosed with similar fencing. Upon completion in around November 2017, School No. 4 was also highly securitised and a tender was released calling for bidders to oversee and install new equipment, including a new surveillance camera system - The video posted by Hu Xijin of Middle School No. 4 on 24 October shows detainees dancing and playing table-tennis and basketball. However, this visit—and the footage shared on social media—may not reflect the regular daily experiences of the detainees. - Through satellite and imagery analysis—including imagery updated daily—we can determine that these courts are coloured mats that are recent additions to the camp. The mats were placed on a concrete-covered area that is normally bare and appears inaccessible to detainees. - Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October - Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October
    1
  4436. 1
  4437. 1
  4438. 1
  4439. 1
  4440. ​@agapp11able Wumao, in case you didn't see my response: - "If they're incompetent, then how do we know that they're right about the rest of the facilities?" You identified 4 facilities and used CCP state media or random people online who only defend the CCP on their twitter accounts. In a couple of instances, the source is literally just the CCP saying it's not what ASPI claims. In another, they have a video of a classroom that can be anywhere and you accept it as evidence but yet won't say how you can even tell that classroom is in the facility. QUESTION: WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE THE CLASSROOM IS IN THE SAME BUILDING AS ASPI IDENTIFIED FACILITIY? WHY WON'T YOU PROVIDE OTHER VIDEOS OF THE KIDS PLAYING OUTISIDE IN THE FACILITY OR EVEN JUST GOING IN AND OUT OF THE BUILDING? - ""Where's your serious criticism of the USA? Why did you ignore previous requests?" I gave you lots of criticism from racism in the US both systemic and individual, bad safety nets for the poor, no universal healthcare, corrupt and immorale presidents. You have "I dislike China's ban on private tutoring" LOL, typical wumao. Q: WHY DO YOU REFUSE TO MAKE ANY SERIOUS CRTICISM OF CHINA? YOU A WUMAO? - ""So do you admit then that ASPI is funded by the military of both Australia and the USA? Yes or no?"" ASPI makes their funding very clear unlike your CCP sources. I already gave you the breakdown earlier -- 70% comes from Australia itself and 80% comes from Australia plus private non-government non-defense contractor. Q: WHY DO YOU ACCEPT PROPOGANDA NEWS OUTLET RUN BY THE VERY SAME GOVERNMENT ACCUSSED? - ""Do you admit that many Chinese middle and high schools are boarding schools and have kids live in them. Yes or no?"" I never said they didn't. But you're saying that it's common for boarding schools for MIDDLE SCHOOL to have 10,000+ students and prison walls. Q: GIVE A SOURCE THAT 10,000+ STUDENTS AND PRISON WALLS ARE TYPICAL OF MIDDLE SCHOOL BOARDING SCHOOLS. Q: DO YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT CHINA CREATES PROPOGANDA VIDEOS? IF NOT, PROVE TO ME THE SOLID EVIDENCE ASPI PROVIDED ISN'T CHINA CREATING PROPOGANDA VIDEO? GO AHEAD, ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS. YOU WON'T BECAUSE YOU ARE A WUMAO.
    1
  4441. @agapp11able ​ Wumao, in case you didn't see my response: - "If they're incompetent, then how do we know that they're right about the rest of the facilities?" You identified 4 facilities and used CCP state media or random people online who only defend the CCP on their twitter accounts. In a couple of instances, the source is literally just the CCP saying it's not what ASPI claims. In another, they have a video of a classroom that can be anywhere and you accept it as evidence but yet won't say how you can even tell that classroom is in the facility. QUESTION: WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE THE CLASSROOM IS IN THE SAME BUILDING AS ASPI IDENTIFIED FACILITIY? WHY WON'T YOU PROVIDE OTHER VIDEOS OF THE KIDS PLAYING OUTISIDE IN THE FACILITY OR EVEN JUST GOING IN AND OUT OF THE BUILDING? - ""Where's your serious criticism of the USA? Why did you ignore previous requests?" I gave you lots of criticism from racism in the US both systemic and individual, bad safety nets for the poor, no universal healthcare, corrupt and immorale presidents. You have "I dislike China's ban on private tutoring" LOL, typical wumao. Q: WHY DO YOU REFUSE TO MAKE ANY SERIOUS CRTICISM OF CHINA? YOU A WUMAO? - ""So do you admit then that ASPI is funded by the military of both Australia and the USA? Yes or no?"" ASPI makes their funding very clear unlike your CCP sources. I already gave you the breakdown earlier -- 70% comes from Australia itself and 80% comes from Australia plus private non-government non-defense contractor. Q: WHY DO YOU ACCEPT PROPOGANDA NEWS OUTLET RUN BY THE VERY SAME GOVERNMENT ACCUSSED? - ""Do you admit that many Chinese middle and high schools are boarding schools and have kids live in them. Yes or no?"" I never said they didn't. But you're saying that it's common for boarding schools for MIDDLE SCHOOL to have 10,000+ students and prison walls. Q: GIVE A SOURCE THAT 10,000+ STUDENTS AND PRISON WALLS ARE TYPICAL OF MIDDLE SCHOOL BOARDING SCHOOLS. Q: DO YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT CHINA CREATES PROPOGANDA VIDEOS? IF NOT, PROVE TO ME THE SOLID EVIDENCE ASPI PROVIDED ISN'T CHINA CREATING PROPOGANDA VIDEO? GO AHEAD, ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS. YOU WON'T BECAUSE YOU ARE A WUMAO.
    1
  4442. @agapp11able Wumao, in case you didn't see my response: - "If they're incompetent, then how do we know that they're right about the rest of the facilities?" You identified 4 facilities and used CCP state media or random people online who only defend the CCP on their twitter accounts. In a couple of instances, the source is literally just the CCP saying it's not what ASPI claims. In another, they have a video of a classroom that can be anywhere and you accept it as evidence but yet won't say how you can even tell that classroom is in the facility. QUESTION: WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE THE CLASSROOM IS IN THE SAME BUILDING AS ASPI IDENTIFIED FACILITIY? WHY WON'T YOU PROVIDE OTHER VIDEOS OF THE KIDS PLAYING OUTISIDE IN THE FACILITY OR EVEN JUST GOING IN AND OUT OF THE BUILDING? - ""Where's your serious criticism of the USA? Why did you ignore previous requests?" I gave you lots of criticism from racism in the US both systemic and individual, bad safety nets for the poor, no universal healthcare, corrupt and immorale presidents. You have "I dislike China's ban on private tutoring" LOL, typical wumao. Q: WHY DO YOU REFUSE TO MAKE ANY SERIOUS CRTICISM OF CHINA? YOU A WUMAO? - ""So do you admit then that ASPI is funded by the military of both Australia and the USA? Yes or no?"" ASPI makes their funding very clear unlike your CCP sources. I already gave you the breakdown earlier -- 70% comes from Australia itself and 80% comes from Australia plus private non-government non-defense contractor. Q: WHY DO YOU ACCEPT PROPOGANDA NEWS OUTLET RUN BY THE VERY SAME GOVERNMENT ACCUSSED? - ""Do you admit that many Chinese middle and high schools are boarding schools and have kids live in them. Yes or no?"" I never said they didn't. But you're saying that it's common for boarding schools for MIDDLE SCHOOL to have 10,000+ students and prison walls. Q: GIVE A SOURCE THAT 10,000+ STUDENTS AND PRISON WALLS ARE TYPICAL OF MIDDLE SCHOOL BOARDING SCHOOLS. GO AHEAD, ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS. YOU WON'T BECAUSE YOU ARE A WUMAO.
    1
  4443. @agapp11able - "Why can't random people discredit bad sources if they speak the language or have information that others don't? Why can't random people who have clearly accounts that repeatedly use CCP propaganda can't be trusted? And when their evidence is basically "the CCP said it's not what ASPI said" or just a random pic? - "It doesn't matter if the people "defend the CCP", what matters is if there conclusions stand up to scrutiny. And they do." And I would say the EXACT same thing about you regarding Amnesty International, NYT, BBC, and ASPI among many others. You see how this works? You get to use obvious CCP propoganda sources abut then claim every other sources can't be trusted. "Yes. That's not why I linked that video. " A video created by the CCP state propaganda media where they show a classroom that could be anywhere. - "The reason I linked it was because you can see the school." You see a classroom. WHY WON'T YOU GIVE EVIDENCE IT'S THE SAME FACILITY? - "Why are you so fixated on the class? Most of the video is irrelevant. The most important part is where you see the map and the school" So you agree the video doesn't actually show anything from the facility itself in video form? But your saying that the same satellite images show it's a school because the CCP said it's a school? Q: EXPLAIN YOURELF. WHAT FROM THE VIDEO SHOWS MAPS THAT PROVE IT'S A SCHOOL? WHAT TIME MARKER? - " Because you can literally see the building in the video from the outside lol" Q: WHAT TIME MARKER DO YOU SEE THE BUILDING OUTSIDE THAT CONFIRMS IT'S THE SAME FACILITY? WHAT BUILDING MATCHES UP WITH THE BUILDING IN THE VIDEO?
    1
  4444. 1
  4445. @agapp11able and the source that shows CCP staging videos is "Mapping Xinjiang’s ‘re-education’ camps" from "ASPI". Google that and it should be top result or just copy & paste paragraphs from below. Below is highlighted text: WUMAO, ASPI has a great article on how China often tries to lie and use propaganda videos which wumaos like you then use to say "see, no detention facility of Uyghurs!" - Last month, Global Times editor Hu Xijin visited what he referred to as a ‘vocational training center’ in Kashgar. He posted a two-minute video of the trip on his Twitter account - But by July 2017, when construction was complete, every ‘school’ building in the southwest of the facility (previously Middle School No. 5) was surrounded by tall fencing that had been painted green and topped with razor wire. By August, much of School No. 6 was enclosed with similar fencing. Upon completion in around November 2017, School No. 4 was also highly securitised and a tender was released calling for bidders to oversee and install new equipment, including a new surveillance camera system - The video posted by Hu Xijin of Middle School No. 4 on 24 October shows detainees dancing and playing table-tennis and basketball. However, this visit—and the footage shared on social media—may not reflect the regular daily experiences of the detainees. - Through satellite and imagery analysis—including imagery updated daily—we can determine that these courts are coloured mats that are recent additions to the camp. The mats were placed on a concrete-covered area that is normally bare and appears inaccessible to detainees. - Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October - Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October
    1
  4446. 1
  4447. 1
  4448. 1
  4449. 1
  4450. 1
  4451. 1
  4452. 1
  4453. 1
  4454. 1
  4455. 1
  4456. 1
  4457. 1
  4458. 1
  4459. 1
  4460. 1
  4461. 1
  4462. 1
  4463. 1
  4464. 1
  4465. 1
  4466. 1
  4467. 1
  4468. 1
  4469. 1
  4470. 1
  4471. 1
  4472. 1
  4473. 1
  4474. 1
  4475. 1
  4476. 1
  4477. 1
  4478. 1
  4479. 1
  4480. 1
  4481. @agapp11able WHY DO YOU REFUSE TO POINT OUT WHERE ASPI LIED IN ITS ARTICLE WITH EVIDENCE OF CHINA STAGING VIDEOS? WUMAO, ASPI has a great article on how China often tries to lie and use propaganda videos which wumaos like you then use to say "see, no detention facility of Uyghurs!". - Last month, Global Times editor Hu Xijin visited what he referred to as a ‘vocational training center’ in Kashgar. He posted a two-minute video of the trip on his Twitter account - But by July 2017, when construction was complete, every ‘school’ building in the southwest of the facility (previously Middle School No. 5) was surrounded by tall fencing that had been painted green and topped with razor wire. By August, much of School No. 6 was enclosed with similar fencing. Upon completion in around November 2017, School No. 4 was also highly securitised and a tender was released calling for bidders to oversee and install new equipment, including a new surveillance camera system - The video posted by Hu Xijin of Middle School No. 4 on 24 October shows detainees dancing and playing table-tennis and basketball. However, this visit—and the footage shared on social media—may not reflect the regular daily experiences of the detainees. - Through satellite and imagery analysis—including imagery updated daily—we can determine that these courts are coloured mats that are recent additions to the camp. The mats were placed on a concrete-covered area that is normally bare and appears inaccessible to detainees. - Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October - Across 25 satellite images between August 2017 and August 2018, which show the facility since its construction, not a single image featured these outdoor courts. But these coloured mats do appear in satellite imagery available from 10 October. Global Times editor Hu Xijin posted about his visit to these facilities on Twitter and Weibo on 24 October
    1
  4482. 1
  4483. 1
  4484. 1
  4485. 1
  4486. 1
  4487. 1
  4488. 1
  4489. 1
  4490. 1
  4491. 1
  4492. 1
  4493. 1
  4494. 1
  4495. 1
  4496. 1
  4497. 1
  4498. 1
  4499. 1
  4500. 1
  4501. 1
  4502. 1
  4503. 1
  4504. 1
  4505. 1
  4506. 1
  4507. 1
  4508. 1
  4509. 1
  4510. 1
  4511. 1
  4512. 1
  4513. 1
  4514. 1
  4515. 1
  4516. 1
  4517. 1
  4518. 1
  4519. 1
  4520. 1
  4521. 1
  4522. 1
  4523. 1
  4524. 1
  4525. 1
  4526. 1
  4527. 1
  4528. 1
  4529. 1
  4530. 1
  4531. 1
  4532. 1
  4533. 1
  4534. 1
  4535. 1
  4536. 1
  4537. 1
  4538. 1
  4539. 1
  4540. 1
  4541. 1
  4542. 1
  4543. 1
  4544. 1
  4545. 1
  4546. 1
  4547. 1
  4548. 1
  4549. 1
  4550. 1
  4551. 1
  4552. 1
  4553. 1
  4554. 1
  4555. 1
  4556. 1
  4557. 1
  4558. 1
  4559. 1
  4560. 1
  4561. 1
  4562. 1
  4563. 1
  4564. 1
  4565. 1
  4566. 1
  4567. 1
  4568. 1
  4569. 1
  4570. 1
  4571. 1
  4572. 1
  4573. 1
  4574. 1
  4575. 1
  4576. 1
  4577. 1
  4578. 1
  4579. 1
  4580. 1
  4581. 1
  4582. 1
  4583. 1
  4584. 1
  4585. 1
  4586. 1
  4587. 1
  4588. 1
  4589. 1
  4590. 1
  4591. 1
  4592. 1
  4593. 1
  4594. 1
  4595. 1
  4596. 1
  4597. 1
  4598. 1
  4599. 1
  4600. 1
  4601. 1
  4602. 1
  4603. 1
  4604. 1
  4605. 1
  4606. 1
  4607. 1
  4608. 1
  4609. 1
  4610. 1
  4611. 1
  4612. 1
  4613. 1
  4614. 1
  4615. 1
  4616. 1
  4617. 1
  4618. 1
  4619. 1
  4620. 1
  4621. 1
  4622. 1
  4623. 1
  4624. 1
  4625. 1
  4626. 1
  4627. 1
  4628. 1
  4629. 1
  4630. 1
  4631. 1
  4632. 1
  4633. 1
  4634. 1
  4635. 1
  4636. 1
  4637. 1
  4638. 1
  4639. 1
  4640. 1
  4641. 1
  4642. 1
  4643. 1
  4644. 1
  4645. 1
  4646. 1
  4647. 1
  4648. 1
  4649. 1
  4650. 1
  4651. 1
  4652. 1
  4653. 1
  4654. 1
  4655. 1
  4656. 1
  4657. 1
  4658. 1
  4659. 1
  4660. 1
  4661. 1
  4662. 1
  4663. 1
  4664. 1
  4665. 1
  4666. 1
  4667. 1
  4668. 1
  4669. 1
  4670. 1
  4671. 1
  4672. 1
  4673. 1
  4674. 1
  4675. 1
  4676. 1
  4677. 1
  4678. 1
  4679. 1
  4680. 1
  4681. 1
  4682. 1
  4683. 1
  4684. 1
  4685. 1
  4686. 1
  4687. 1
  4688. 1
  4689. 1
  4690. 1
  4691. 1
  4692. 1
  4693. 1
  4694. 1
  4695. 1
  4696. 1
  4697. 1
  4698. 1
  4699. 1
  4700. 1
  4701. 1
  4702. 1
  4703. 1
  4704. 1
  4705. 1
  4706. 1
  4707. 1
  4708. 1
  4709. 1
  4710. 1
  4711. 1
  4712. 1
  4713. 1
  4714. 1
  4715. 1
  4716. 1
  4717. 1
  4718. 1
  4719. 1
  4720. 1
  4721. 1
  4722. 1
  4723. 1
  4724. 1
  4725. 1
  4726. 1
  4727. 1
  4728. 1
  4729. 1
  4730. 1
  4731. 1
  4732. 1
  4733. 1
  4734. 1
  4735. 1
  4736. 1
  4737. 1
  4738. 1
  4739. 1
  4740. 1
  4741. 1
  4742. 1
  4743. 1
  4744. 1
  4745. 1
  4746. 1
  4747. 1
  4748. 1
  4749. 1
  4750. 1
  4751. 1
  4752. 1
  4753. 1
  4754. 1
  4755. 1
  4756. 1
  4757. 1
  4758. 1
  4759. 1
  4760. 1
  4761. 1
  4762. 1
  4763. 1
  4764. 1
  4765. 1
  4766. 1
  4767. 1
  4768. 1
  4769. 1
  4770. 1
  4771. 1
  4772. 1
  4773. 1
  4774. 1
  4775. 1
  4776. 1
  4777. 1
  4778. 1
  4779. 1
  4780. 1
  4781. 1
  4782. 1
  4783. 1
  4784. 1
  4785. 1
  4786. 1
  4787. 1
  4788. 1
  4789. 1
  4790. 1
  4791. 1
  4792. 1
  4793. 1
  4794. 1
  4795. 1
  4796. 1
  4797. 1
  4798. 1
  4799. 1
  4800. 1
  4801. 1
  4802. 1
  4803. 1
  4804. 1
  4805. 1
  4806. 1
  4807. 1
  4808. 1
  4809. 1
  4810. 1
  4811. 1
  4812. 1
  4813. 1
  4814. 1
  4815. 1
  4816. 1
  4817. 1
  4818. 1
  4819. 1
  4820. 1
  4821. 1
  4822. 1
  4823. 1
  4824. 1
  4825. 1
  4826. 1
  4827. 1
  4828. 1
  4829. 1
  4830. 1
  4831. 1
  4832. 1
  4833. 1
  4834. 1
  4835. 1
  4836. 1
  4837. 1
  4838. 1
  4839. 1
  4840. 1
  4841. 1
  4842. 1
  4843. 1
  4844. 1
  4845. 1
  4846. 1
  4847. 1
  4848. 1
  4849. 1
  4850. 1
  4851. 1
  4852. 1
  4853. 1
  4854. 1
  4855. 1
  4856. 1
  4857. 1
  4858. 1
  4859. 1
  4860. 1
  4861. 1
  4862. 1
  4863. 1
  4864. 1
  4865. 1
  4866. 1
  4867. 1
  4868. 1
  4869. 1
  4870. 1
  4871. 1
  4872. 1
  4873. 1
  4874. 1
  4875. 1
  4876. 1
  4877. 1
  4878. 1
  4879. 1
  4880. 1
  4881. 1
  4882. 1
  4883. 1
  4884. 1
  4885. 1
  4886. 1
  4887. 1
  4888. 1
  4889. 1
  4890. 1
  4891. 1
  4892. 1
  4893. 1
  4894. 1
  4895. 1
  4896. 1
  4897. 1
  4898. 1
  4899. 1
  4900. 1
  4901. 1
  4902. 1
  4903. 1
  4904. 1
  4905. 1
  4906. 1
  4907. 1
  4908. 1
  4909. 1
  4910. 1
  4911. 1
  4912. 1
  4913. 1
  4914. 1
  4915. 1
  4916. 1
  4917. 1
  4918. 1
  4919. 1
  4920. 1
  4921. 1
  4922. 1
  4923. 1
  4924. 1
  4925. 1
  4926. 1
  4927. 1
  4928. 1
  4929.  @JamesKerLindsay  I see the exact same comments here as I do on Reddit world political subs. Well, from Indian nationals. I find their arguments confusing because they often say “India is just doing whats best for India” to defend indias relationship with Russia but if they really believed in Indian doing what’s best for India, they would support India weakening their ties with Russia considering the west is both Indias biggest trade partners and their closest Ally against China. I believe the big support for Russia comes from two very different groups. One is going to be the traditional Indian nationalist who support Russia in part for soviet support but most importantly because this groups is very anti west due to British colonial history. The other are far leftist (communist, authoritarian socialist) and they will support Russia mostly because of Soviet Union ties but also like the first group they are also very anti west. I base this on the comments I’ve frequently seen on Reddit from indian which I then look at their comment history to understand what other arguments they are making. The pro Russia Indian nationalist are constantly making anti west comments everywhere and the leftist Indians are of course constantly defending communism past and present while also frequently defending anyone that goes against the west. I’m no expert but if hundreds of Indian redditors that frequently post in those Reddit subs are decent representation of Indians opinion, I’m confident that’s what’s going on. In the US you have something similar though not as strong as in India. There is sizable number of nationalist in the US who either support Russia or are blah about him. Trump was praising Putin often but so does many right wing media. It’s sort of split on right wing media though. And of course far left Americans also have some level of support for Russia but there aren’t many of those people in the US. Our more typical left goes up to Bernie Sanders and his supporters aren’t Putin fans at all. Beyond Bernie is just a fringe group of far leftist.
    1
  4930. 1
  4931. 1
  4932. 1
  4933. 1
  4934. 1
  4935. 1
  4936. 1
  4937. 1
  4938. 1
  4939. 1
  4940. 1
  4941. 1
  4942. 1
  4943. 1
  4944. 1
  4945. 1
  4946. 1
  4947. 1
  4948. 1
  4949. 1
  4950. 1
  4951. 1
  4952. 1
  4953. 1
  4954. 1
  4955. 1
  4956. 1
  4957. 1
  4958. 1
  4959. 1
  4960. 1
  4961. 1
  4962. 1
  4963. 1
  4964. 1
  4965. 1
  4966. 1
  4967. 1
  4968. 1
  4969. 1
  4970. 1
  4971. 1
  4972. 1
  4973. 1
  4974. 1
  4975. 1
  4976. 1
  4977. 1
  4978. 1
  4979. 1
  4980. 1
  4981. 1
  4982. 1
  4983. 1
  4984. 1
  4985. 1
  4986. 1
  4987. 1
  4988. 1
  4989. 1
  4990. 1
  4991. 1
  4992. 1
  4993. 1
  4994. 1
  4995. 1
  4996. 1
  4997. 1
  4998. 1
  4999. 1
  5000. 1
  5001. 1
  5002. 1
  5003. 1
  5004. 1
  5005. 1
  5006. 1
  5007. 1
  5008. 1
  5009. 1
  5010. 1
  5011. 1
  5012. 1
  5013. 1
  5014. 1
  5015. 1
  5016. 1
  5017. 1
  5018. 1
  5019. 1
  5020. 1
  5021. 1
  5022. 1
  5023. 1
  5024. 1
  5025. 1
  5026. 1
  5027. 1
  5028. 1
  5029. 1
  5030. 1
  5031. 1
  5032. 1
  5033. 1
  5034. 1
  5035. 1
  5036. 1
  5037. 1
  5038. 1
  5039. 1
  5040. 1
  5041. 1
  5042. 1
  5043. 1
  5044. 1
  5045. 1
  5046. 1
  5047. 1
  5048. 1
  5049. 1
  5050. 1
  5051. 1
  5052. 1
  5053. 1
  5054. 1
  5055. 1
  5056. 1
  5057. 1
  5058. 1
  5059. 1
  5060. 1
  5061.  @weaver1507  June 22, 1965: Minister of Foreign Affairs Shiina Etsusaburo said to the people of South Korea: "In our two countries' long history there have been unfortunate times, it is truly regrettable and we are deeply remorseful" (Signing of the Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and South Korea). August 26, 1982: Chief Cabinet Secretary Kiichi Miyazawa said to the people of the Republic of Korea: "1. The Japanese Government and the Japanese people are deeply aware of the fact that acts by our country in the past caused tremendous suffering and damage to the peoples of Asian countries, including the Republic of Korea (ROK) and China, and have followed the path of a pacifist state with remorse and determination that such acts must never be repeated. Japan has recognized, in the Japan-ROK Joint Communique, of 1965, that the 'past relations are regrettable, and Japan feels deep remorse,' and in the Japan-China Joint Communique, that Japan is 'keenly conscious of the responsibility for the serious damage that Japan caused in the past to the Chinese people through war and deeply reproaches itself.' These statements confirm Japan's remorse and determination which I stated above and this recognition has not changed at all to this day. 2. This spirit in the Japan-ROK Joint Communique, and the Japan-China Joint Communique, naturally should also be respected in Japan's school education and textbook authorization. 1989: Prime Minister Takeshita Noboru, in a speech in the Japanese Diet, said: "As we have made clear previously at repeated opportunities, the Japanese government and the Japanese people are deeply conscious of the fact that the actions of our country in the past caused suffering and loss to many people in neighboring countries. Starting from our regret and resolve not to repeat such things a second time, we have followed a course as a "Peace Nation" since then. This awareness and regret should be emphasized especially in the relationship between our countries and the Korean Peninsula, our nearest neighbors both geographically and historically. At this opportunity, as we face a new situation in the Korean Peninsula, again, to all peoples of the globe, concerning the relationship of the past, we want to express our deep regret and sorrow" April 18, 1990: Minister of Foreign Affairs Taro Nakayama said to the people of South Korea: "Japan is deeply sorry for the tragedy in which these (Korean) people were moved to Sakhalin not of their own free will but by the design of the Japanese government and had to remain there after the conclusion of the war" (188th National Diet Session Lower House Committee of Foreign Affairs).
    1
  5062. 1
  5063. 1
  5064. 1
  5065. 1
  5066. 1
  5067. 1
  5068. 1
  5069. 1
  5070. 1
  5071. 1
  5072. 1
  5073. 1
  5074. 1
  5075. 1
  5076. 1
  5077. 1
  5078. 1
  5079. 1
  5080. 1
  5081. 1
  5082. 1
  5083. 1
  5084. 1
  5085. 1
  5086. 1
  5087. 1
  5088. 1
  5089. 1
  5090. 1
  5091. 1
  5092. 1
  5093. 1
  5094. 1
  5095. 1
  5096. 1
  5097. 1
  5098. 1
  5099. 1
  5100. 1
  5101. 1
  5102. 1
  5103. 1
  5104. 1
  5105. 1
  5106. 1
  5107. 1
  5108. 1
  5109. 1
  5110. 1
  5111. 1
  5112. 1
  5113. 1
  5114. 1
  5115. 1
  5116. 1
  5117. 1
  5118. 1
  5119. 1
  5120. 1
  5121. 1
  5122. 1
  5123. 1
  5124. 1
  5125. 1
  5126. 1
  5127. 1
  5128. 1
  5129. 1
  5130. 1
  5131. 1
  5132. 1
  5133. 1
  5134. 1
  5135. 1
  5136. 1
  5137. 1
  5138. 1
  5139. 1
  5140. 1
  5141. 1
  5142. 1
  5143. 1
  5144. 1
  5145. 1
  5146. 1
  5147. 1
  5148. 1
  5149. 1
  5150. 1
  5151. 1
  5152. 1
  5153. 1
  5154. 1
  5155. 1
  5156. 1
  5157. 1
  5158. 1
  5159. 1
  5160. 1
  5161. 1
  5162. 1
  5163. 1
  5164. 1
  5165. 1
  5166. 1
  5167. 1
  5168. 1
  5169. 1
  5170. 1
  5171. 1
  5172. 1
  5173. 1
  5174. 1
  5175. 1
  5176. 1
  5177. 1
  5178. 1
  5179. 1
  5180. 1
  5181. 1
  5182. 1
  5183. 1
  5184. 1
  5185. 1
  5186. 1
  5187. 1
  5188. 1
  5189.  @lightup6751  "Mexicans obviously know to make Mexican tacos". Yes, and they don't forget the moment they cross into the US. "But more often that not the flavor changes because the food is being adapted to the local palate. " Sometimes yes, sometimes no. There are mexican restaurants who don't adapt to the local palate just like there are those that do. Historically, adapting to local palates was cheap versions so think Taco bell style tacos though now you are seeing 'upgraded' or modern versions. Better ingredients like higher end cuts of meats. "Tacos in LA typically do use different recipes, ingredients and taste not quiet the same. Of course, even inside Mexico the flavors can totally differ." I am Mexican American. I'm also a bit old compared to the typical person leaving comments on youtube (which are usually teens or 20 something year olds). I don't live in LA but I've been there a dozen times (work plus have some family in the area). I've grew up going to Mexico to visit family every summer and then didn't go to Mexico (not counting cancun strip lol) after high school until I was around 30. I've been to different parts of Mexico the past 6 or so years from local spots in riveria maya (not the tourist area) to San Luis Potosi to Guanajuato to San Miguel de Allende to Queretaro. The tacos are often a little different everywhere but are still generally the same and you can find similar tastes and ingredients in the US with some Mexican tacos. But that's not to say all so called authentic tacos in the US are the same as Mexico but there are certainly many of them in Mexican neighborhoods, including LA. The biggest difference is just that in the US, most authentic tacos stick to roughly the same 6-8 meat fillings. In Mexico, while most taco places have 3-6 meat fillings at their location, they often vary from restaurant to restaurant (or cart to cart). That's where Mexico easily outshines the US -- you can walk around and find many different fillings. If it's an actual store (taqueria), they might have 20+ fillings as options with half of them rarely found in the US if at all. But overall, if it's the same fillings, there isn't much difference between between a typical taco in mexico and a typical one in the US from a true authentic Mexican restaurant. My ex is from China. She sees some of the same with Chinese food. There are of course lots of Chinese American restaurants. She dislikes people calling them Chinese but she things some are good like PF Chang or for being fast food, she thinks Panda Express is good value. She mostly dislikes the hole in wall old Cantonese restaurants. Those have been made cheap and Americanized heavily. But we would go to restaurants she picked that she found to be very authentic. Those restaurants would sometimes have two menus -- traditional/authentic and American Chinese. One thing Chinese restaurants in the US do better than Mexican restaurants is that authentic Chinese restaurants offer far more options that are typical in China which is why their menus can be huge. Mexican restaurants, as I said, even when authentic tend to just limit what is served so you will miss out on some foods from Mexico.
    1
  5190. 1
  5191. 1
  5192. 1
  5193. 1
  5194. 1
  5195. 1
  5196. 1
  5197. 1
  5198. 1
  5199. 1
  5200. 1
  5201. 1
  5202. 1
  5203. 1
  5204. 1
  5205. 1
  5206. 1
  5207. 1
  5208. 1
  5209. 1
  5210. 1
  5211. 1
  5212. 1
  5213. 1
  5214. 1
  5215. 1
  5216. 1
  5217. 1
  5218. 1
  5219. 1
  5220. 1
  5221. 1
  5222. 1
  5223. 1
  5224. 1
  5225. 1
  5226. 1
  5227. 1
  5228. 1
  5229. 1
  5230. 1
  5231. 1
  5232. 1
  5233. 1
  5234. 1
  5235. 1
  5236. 1
  5237. 1
  5238. 1
  5239. 1
  5240. 1
  5241. 1
  5242. 1
  5243. 1
  5244. 1
  5245. 1
  5246. 1
  5247. 1
  5248. 1
  5249. 1
  5250. 1
  5251. 1
  5252. 1
  5253. 1
  5254. 1
  5255. 1
  5256. 1
  5257. 1
  5258. 1
  5259. 1
  5260. 1
  5261. 1
  5262. 1
  5263. 1
  5264. 1
  5265. 1
  5266. 1
  5267. 1
  5268. 1
  5269. 1
  5270. 1
  5271. 1
  5272. 1
  5273. 1
  5274. 1
  5275. 1
  5276. 1
  5277. 1
  5278. 1
  5279. 1
  5280. 1
  5281. 1
  5282. 1
  5283. 1
  5284. 1
  5285. 1
  5286. 1
  5287. 1
  5288. 1
  5289. 1
  5290. 1
  5291. 1
  5292. 1
  5293. 1
  5294. 1
  5295. 1
  5296. 1
  5297. 1
  5298. 1
  5299. 1
  5300. 1
  5301. 1
  5302. 1
  5303. 1
  5304. 1
  5305. 1
  5306. 1
  5307. 1
  5308. 1
  5309. 1
  5310. 1
  5311. 1
  5312. 1
  5313. 1
  5314. 1
  5315. 1
  5316. 1
  5317. 1
  5318. 1
  5319. 1
  5320. 1
  5321. 1
  5322. 1
  5323. 1
  5324. 1
  5325. 1
  5326. 1
  5327. 1
  5328. 1
  5329. 1
  5330. 1
  5331. 1
  5332. 1
  5333. 1
  5334. 1
  5335. 1
  5336. 1
  5337. 1
  5338. 1
  5339. 1
  5340. 1
  5341. 1
  5342. 1
  5343. 1
  5344. 1
  5345. 1
  5346. 1
  5347. 1
  5348. 1
  5349. 1
  5350. 1
  5351. 1
  5352. 1
  5353. 1
  5354. 1
  5355. 1
  5356. 1
  5357. 1
  5358. 1
  5359. 1
  5360. 1
  5361. 1
  5362. 1
  5363. 1
  5364. 1
  5365. 1
  5366. 1
  5367. 1
  5368. 1
  5369. 1
  5370. 1
  5371. 1
  5372. 1
  5373. 1
  5374. 1
  5375. 1
  5376. 1
  5377. 1
  5378. 1
  5379. 1
  5380. 1
  5381. 1
  5382. 1
  5383. 1
  5384. 1
  5385. 1
  5386. 1
  5387. 1
  5388. 1
  5389. 1
  5390. 1
  5391. 1
  5392. 1
  5393. 1
  5394. 1
  5395. 1
  5396. 1
  5397. 1
  5398. 1
  5399. 1
  5400. 1
  5401. 1
  5402. 1
  5403. 1
  5404. 1
  5405. 1
  5406. 1
  5407. 1
  5408. 1
  5409. 1
  5410. 1
  5411. 1
  5412. 1
  5413. 1
  5414. 1
  5415. 1
  5416. 1
  5417. 1
  5418. 1
  5419. 1
  5420. 1
  5421. 1
  5422. 1
  5423. 1
  5424. 1
  5425. 1
  5426. 1
  5427. 1
  5428. 1
  5429. 1
  5430. 1
  5431. 1
  5432. 1
  5433. 1
  5434. 1
  5435. 1
  5436. 1
  5437. 1
  5438. 1
  5439. 1
  5440. 1
  5441. 1
  5442. 1
  5443. 1
  5444. 1
  5445. 1
  5446. 1
  5447. 1
  5448. 1
  5449. 1
  5450. 1
  5451. 1
  5452. 1
  5453. 1
  5454. 1
  5455. 1
  5456. 1
  5457. 1
  5458. 1
  5459. 1
  5460. 1
  5461. 1
  5462. 1
  5463. 1
  5464. 1
  5465. 1
  5466. 1
  5467. 1
  5468. 1
  5469. 1
  5470. 1
  5471. 1
  5472. 1
  5473. 1
  5474. 1
  5475. 1
  5476. 1
  5477. 1
  5478. 1
  5479. 1
  5480. 1
  5481. 1
  5482. 1
  5483. 1
  5484. 1
  5485. 1
  5486. 1
  5487. 1
  5488. 1
  5489. 1
  5490. 1
  5491. 1
  5492. 1
  5493. 1
  5494. 1
  5495. 1
  5496. 1
  5497. 1
  5498. 1
  5499. 1
  5500. 1
  5501. 1
  5502. 1
  5503. 1
  5504. 1
  5505. 1
  5506. 1
  5507. 1
  5508. 1
  5509.  @Wha2les  "we are not talking about the morality of governments" But how a video or content chooses to describe events will lead viewers to certain opinion of morality of governments, even if not intentional. That's what I meant with the Adolph comparison...simply by portraying the center as neutral, it may lead viewers to think that both sides have equal points. >"Like the United States is the beacon of virtues?" if it was, then this would 100% be just about bad things of China. But US is not a beacon of virtues. >We are only talking about the territorial dispute of the unfinished Civil war in China. Your phrasing is literally proving my point. That comment itself can suggest that Taiwan is factor in why it's unfinished when it's really all about China's government not wanting to just let the civil war be finished. You don't see South Korea making threats to take back North Korea. >"You can not blame the Mainland for wanting to complete its territorial claim on Taiwan." See, more proving my point. You are certainly defending China which is exactly the whole point I made and I had believed you were trying to defend China by how you supported how this video tried to make Taiwan (or Taiwan/US) look equally at fault. I'll point right back to South Korea and how they aren't talking about forcibly taking North Korea back. Why can't China do this? It's only North Korea and China acting like that...coincidence that they are autocratic authoritarian governments? So you proved that this video appeals to the type of person who China's opinions about Taiwan. You also stated a lot of factually incorrect things in your posts which I will address in the 2nd part so as to not clutter this response.
    1
  5510.  @Wha2les  Part 2 of my reply >"You can not blame the Mainland for wanting to complete its territorial claim on Taiwan. It's not like ROC doesn't have claims on Mainland China either. Both claim each other and the South China Sea, and ROC also claimed Mongolia too." ROC claims you are referring to are almost all entirely because China (PRC) refuses to allow Taiwan to change their contisutions regarding those claims as they will see that as an act of independence. And in 2002, Taiwan officially recognized Mongolia as an independent country so you're stating false claims. You literally repeated typical CCP talking points I see online. Hmmm >"Human rights record and all your other criticisms on China, US, etc doesn't matter." It does matter if a video leads audience to believe both sides are equally bad or equally at fault. >We are only in this mess because the CCP in 1949 wasn't able to cross the Taiwan Straits to conquer Taiwan Much like with North Korea, we are only in this mess because an authoritarian oppressive regime does not want to progress and maintains pre-WW2 mentality. >"(Adolph) wanted to take over Europe and disregard other countries sovereignty and eradicate people he didn't like. That is totally different than the China Taiwan issue." An invasion of Taiwan is likely to lead to mass number of Taiwanese eradicated and their sovereignty gone. But regardless, the point of that analogy was to demonstrate how perfectly down the middle gives both sides equal fault. >"Taiwan was a part of China before 1890s when China lost Taiwan to Japan. Japan returned it after WW2 and was under Chinese territorial sovereignty when the KMT fled there in 1949." Never held by the PRC/CCP. >It's like saying if US have a civil war today, It's like saying France should take back Vietnam or England take back India...take back the lands they had 60-70 years ago. Or South Korea send it's army into North Korea. Or Mongolia go into China and take inner Mongolia. 74 years is more than enough time to give up any claims, especially when the claim is a relatively small land.
    1
  5511.  @Wha2les  "Stop looking at this from an American Perspective." It's not an American perspective. The issue is you are looking at it from an authoritarian oppressive perspective. I'm looking at it from the opposite perspective. That's why the opinion you express more aligns with China, North Korea, Russia and others while mine more aligns with Taiwan, Japan, South Korea and most of the west. >"Taiwan and the mainland both consider each other Chinese. It is in the freaking language." Huh, exactly what Russia/Putin said when stealing lands from Ukraine. You sound more and more like Putin/Xi/Kim. Having the same language is not relevant unless you are Putin/Xi/Kim trying to come up with excuses. And 'Chinese'...well, most of Singapore considers themselves 'Chinese', does that mean China can take Singapore? What about the parts of Malaysia where there are large ethnically Chinese populations? 'Chinese' is too broad of a term and that leads to confusion about what it means to be Chinese. Vast majority of people in Taiwan consider themselves to be Taiwanese first before Chinese. It like trying to say Mexican Americans are the same Mexicans in Mexico and thus either side is justified to take lands from the other. If there were no different in cultures between Taiwanese (or Chinese-Taiwanese if you want to be more specific) and Chinese, then Taiwanese would just peacefully unit with China. >"The polls in Taiwan shows that they prefer the status quo and see what happens in the future." Another typical talking pt of the pro CCP. The question in those polls is with the understanding that 'independence' means possible w.a/r. If you actually think they don't want independence if it was guaranteed that China would accept it and not use force on Taiwan, then you don't know Taiwanese people. Or you only speak to the ultra conservative pro CCP types. >"This is a Chinese issue that should be decided by Chinese people in Taiwan and the Mainland." Except Taiwan already decided. They don't want to be part of China. All of this is because China won't accept it. Your constant use of 'Mainland" and Chinese people to refer to Taiwanese along with your argument that is very much aligned with Russia's justification for taking lands from Ukraine really does seem to support that you are pro CCP and pro authoritarian type.
    1
  5512.  @Wha2les  "I love how Americans who don't even understand Chinese history and culture instantly call all their arguments they don't like CCP or whatever talking points." I understand Chinese history VERY well. I've read up on. I've traveled China. My ex is from China. I also work for Taiwanese company and have coworkers from Taiwan. But you're talking points are indeed directly from the CCP and other authoritarian regimes. For example: 1. "Taiwan and the mainland both consider each other Chinese. It is in the freaking language." This is used by Putin/Xi/Kim. 2. " The fact they use Mainland China in Taiwan shows that they still view themselves as Chinese." They view themselves first as Taiwanese by a large margin. I believe only some 5% view themselves as Chinese first. 3. "The polls in Taiwan shows that they prefer the status quo and see what happens in the future." This is purposely misused by pro CCP types. They do not consider that 'independence' option is with the idea war is likely. 4. "It's not like ROC doesn't have claims on Mainland China either. Both claim each other and the South China Sea, and ROC also claimed Mongolia too.". Very typical outdated claims or misleading claims used by the pro CCP crowd. This is a dead giveaway on your motives in this conversation because nobody who is against China's policy on Taiwan states that. Thats stuff that gets repeated among the pro CCP crowd. 5. "Taiwan was a part of China before 1890s when China lost Taiwan to Japan. Japan returned it after WW2 and was under Chinese territorial sovereignty when the KMT fled there in 1949. It's like saying if US have a civil war today, and the green party or whatever fled to Hawaii". Again, terribly bad analogy that's only used by pro CCP crowd. But apparently, from your arguments, North Korea should invade South Korea, Putin was justified invading Ukraine and taking lands with Russian speaking people, and China is justified in invading Taiwan.
    1
  5513. 1
  5514. 1
  5515. 1
  5516. 1
  5517. 1
  5518. 1
  5519. 1
  5520. 1
  5521. 1
  5522. 1
  5523. 1
  5524. 1
  5525. 1
  5526. 1
  5527. 1
  5528. 1
  5529. 1
  5530. 1
  5531. 1
  5532. 1
  5533. 1
  5534. 1
  5535. 1
  5536. 1
  5537. 1
  5538. 1
  5539. 1
  5540. 1
  5541. 1
  5542. 1
  5543. 1
  5544. 1
  5545. 1
  5546. 1
  5547. 1
  5548. 1
  5549. 1
  5550. 1
  5551. 1
  5552. 1
  5553. 1
  5554. 1
  5555. 1
  5556. 1
  5557. 1
  5558. 1
  5559. 1
  5560. 1
  5561. 1
  5562. 1
  5563. 1
  5564. 1
  5565. 1
  5566. 1
  5567. 1
  5568. 1
  5569. 1
  5570. 1
  5571. 1
  5572. 1
  5573. 1
  5574. 1
  5575. 1
  5576. 1
  5577. 1
  5578. 1
  5579. 1
  5580. 1
  5581. 1
  5582. 1
  5583. 1
  5584. Great Q&A. I find myself agreeing with 98% of what you say and the other 2% usually not me having a complete opposite opinion but just some differences on some of the less important details. The only part I where I may disagree is on the statement about China & Russia where you argued China does not like Russia's invasion of Ukraine and that it fundamentally doesn't support the war. I believe they supported the war initially but with the belief that the war would be over in a few days or few weeks. I think they still support the war but just not as strong of support. The reasons for my opinions is that China signed a $100+ billion energy trade deal with Russia and a friendship pact ("friends with no limits") just 3 weeks before the invasion while Russia had 150k-200k troops surrounding Russia. In addition, US intel picked up communications that Chinese officials had told Russian officials to post-pone the war until after Olympics were over. When the war did start, China went full drive in helping spread Russia disinformation, promoted only pro Russian news inside of China, and earlier in 2023 US intel discovered that Russia had stated China agreed to sell weapons or military equipment to Russia but had to figure out how to hide those shipments. A few weeks ago, after a meeting between Putin & Xi was completed, Xi can be heard telling Putin while both are happily smiling that " “Right now there are changes – the likes of which we haven't seen for 100 years – and we are the ones driving these changes together,”" All this leads me to believe China does in fact support the war. I liked most the discussion around 45min mark and the next couple minutes regarding the US, direction of the world, multi-polar world, BRICS, etc. As an American and voting age in 2001 & 2003 when Afghanistan war & Iraq War started, I can say with some confidence that 2003 Iraq War was a hold over of cold war era mentality. The US certainly changed after that and a full scale war is almost unthinkable anymore. The US now is far less likely to get involved in such wars. I also agree that we are seeing the US coming back strong in world affairs but under a western multilateralism. BRICS, as you stated, is more wishful thinking. Too many countries with very different cultures, goals, and economies for them to ever be a strong a group IMO.
    1
  5585. 1
  5586. 1
  5587. 1
  5588. 1
  5589. 1
  5590. 1
  5591. 1
  5592. 1
  5593. 1
  5594. 1
  5595. 1
  5596. 1
  5597. 1
  5598. 1
  5599. 1
  5600. 1
  5601. 1
  5602. 1
  5603. 1
  5604. 1
  5605. 1
  5606. 1
  5607. 1
  5608. 1
  5609. 1
  5610. 1
  5611. 1
  5612. 1
  5613. 1
  5614. 1
  5615. 1
  5616. 1
  5617. 1
  5618. 1
  5619. 1
  5620. 1
  5621. 1
  5622. 1
  5623. 1
  5624. 1
  5625. 1
  5626. 1
  5627. 1
  5628. 1
  5629. 1
  5630. 1
  5631. 1
  5632. 1
  5633. 1
  5634. 1
  5635. 1
  5636. 1
  5637. 1
  5638. 1
  5639. 1
  5640. 1
  5641. 1
  5642. 1
  5643. 1
  5644. 1
  5645. 1
  5646. 1
  5647. 1
  5648. 1
  5649. 1
  5650. 1
  5651. 1
  5652. 1
  5653. 1
  5654. 1
  5655. 1
  5656. 1
  5657. 1
  5658. 1
  5659. 1
  5660. 1
  5661. 1
  5662. 1
  5663. 1
  5664. 1
  5665. 1
  5666. 1
  5667. 1
  5668. 1
  5669. 1
  5670. 1
  5671. 1
  5672. 1
  5673. 1
  5674. 1
  5675. 1
  5676. 1
  5677. 1
  5678. 1
  5679. 1
  5680. 1
  5681. 1
  5682. 1
  5683. 1
  5684. 1
  5685. 1
  5686. 1
  5687. 1
  5688. 1
  5689. 1
  5690. 1
  5691. 1
  5692. 1
  5693. 1
  5694. 1
  5695. 1
  5696. 1
  5697. 1
  5698. 1
  5699. 1
  5700. 1
  5701. 1
  5702. 1
  5703. 1
  5704. 1
  5705. 1
  5706. 1
  5707. 1
  5708. 1
  5709. 1
  5710. 1
  5711. 1
  5712. 1
  5713. 1
  5714. 1
  5715. 1
  5716. 1
  5717. 1
  5718. 1
  5719. 1
  5720. 1
  5721. 1
  5722. 1
  5723. 1
  5724. 1
  5725. 1
  5726. 1
  5727. 1
  5728. 1
  5729. 1
  5730. 1
  5731. 1
  5732. 1
  5733. 1
  5734. 1
  5735. 1
  5736. 1
  5737. 1
  5738. 1
  5739. 1
  5740. 1
  5741. 1
  5742. 1
  5743. 1
  5744. 1
  5745. 1
  5746. 1
  5747. 1
  5748. 1
  5749. 1
  5750. 1
  5751. 1
  5752. 1
  5753. 1
  5754. 1
  5755. 1
  5756. 1
  5757. 1
  5758. 1
  5759. 1
  5760. 1
  5761. 1
  5762. 1
  5763. 1
  5764. 1
  5765. 1
  5766. 1
  5767. 1
  5768. 1
  5769. 1
  5770. 1
  5771. 1
  5772. 1
  5773. 1
  5774. 1
  5775. 1
  5776. 1
  5777.  @CassieAngelica  The video wasn't wrong with the examples they used though. But trying to use some examples to describe welfare as a whole is not good. In regards to higher education, it does seem to benefit the middle class the most when it's subsidized. The solution is just to give a larger disproportionate amount that is spend on public universities to go to financial aid to the poor. "UBI plays directly into the Robin Hood effect, precisely what this segment says is a myth." No, not at all. It would be the opposite. The poor will pay the little into the taxes that fund UBI and thus will greatly benefit the most. The middle class is likely to to get about the same back as they pay into it. The rich will basically be paying for most of the poor's UBI. But Milton did propose something that would start coiming into effect around the time he retired and probably should be used more. He called it 'negative tax' where those earning under a certain amount would have negative income tax rate thus receive money instead of paying that tax. In 1975 the US started the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC)...which is basically that. As Wikipedia describes it: - The United States federal earned income tax credit or earned income credit (EITC or EIC) is a refundable tax credit for low- to moderate-income working individuals and couples, particularly those with children. The amount of EITC benefit depends on a recipient's income and number of children. Low income adults with no children are eligible - EITC phases in slowly, has a medium-length plateau, and phases out more slowly than it was phased in.... Basically it incentivizes the poor to work and they get bigger return the more they work because it slowly phases out rather than being a cut off where if a person makes $9999 they get 20% negative tax but at $10,000 they no negative tax.
    1
  5778. 1
  5779. 1
  5780. 1
  5781. 1
  5782. 1
  5783. 1
  5784. 1
  5785. 1
  5786. 1
  5787. 1
  5788. 1
  5789. 1
  5790. 1
  5791. 1
  5792. 1
  5793. 1
  5794. 1
  5795. 1
  5796. 1
  5797. 1
  5798. 1
  5799. 1
  5800. 1
  5801. 1
  5802. 1
  5803. 1
  5804. 1
  5805. 1
  5806. 1
  5807. 1
  5808. 1
  5809. 1
  5810. 1
  5811. 1
  5812. 1
  5813. 1
  5814. 1
  5815. 1
  5816. 1
  5817. 1
  5818. 1
  5819. 1
  5820. 1
  5821. 1
  5822. 1
  5823. 1
  5824. 1
  5825. 1
  5826. 1
  5827. 1
  5828. 1
  5829. 1
  5830. 1
  5831. 1
  5832. 1
  5833. 1
  5834. 1
  5835. 1
  5836. 1
  5837. 1
  5838. 1
  5839. 1
  5840. 1
  5841. 1
  5842. 1
  5843. 1
  5844. 1
  5845. 1
  5846. 1
  5847. 1
  5848. 1
  5849. 1
  5850. 1
  5851. 1
  5852. 1
  5853. 1
  5854. 1
  5855. 1
  5856. 1
  5857. 1
  5858. 1
  5859. 1
  5860. 1
  5861. 1
  5862. 1
  5863. 1
  5864. 1
  5865. 1
  5866. 1
  5867. 1
  5868. 1
  5869. 1
  5870. 1
  5871. 1
  5872. 1
  5873. 1
  5874. 1
  5875. 1
  5876. 1
  5877. 1
  5878. 1
  5879. 1
  5880. 1
  5881. 1
  5882. 1
  5883. 1
  5884. 1
  5885. 1
  5886. 1
  5887. 1
  5888. 1
  5889. 1
  5890. 1
  5891. 1
  5892. 1
  5893. 1
  5894. 1
  5895. 1
  5896. 1
  5897. 1
  5898. 1
  5899. 1
  5900. 1
  5901. 1
  5902. 1
  5903. 1
  5904. 1
  5905. 1
  5906. 1
  5907. 1
  5908. 1
  5909. 1
  5910. 1
  5911. 1
  5912. 1
  5913. 1
  5914. 1
  5915. 1
  5916. 1
  5917. 1
  5918. 1
  5919. 1
  5920. 1
  5921. 1
  5922. 1
  5923. 1
  5924. 1
  5925. 1
  5926. 1
  5927. 1
  5928. 1
  5929. 1
  5930. 1
  5931. 1
  5932. 1
  5933. 1
  5934. 1
  5935. 1
  5936. 1
  5937. 1
  5938. 1
  5939. 1
  5940. 1
  5941. 1
  5942. 1
  5943. 1
  5944. 1
  5945. 1
  5946. 1
  5947. 1
  5948. 1
  5949. 1
  5950. 1
  5951. 1
  5952. 1
  5953. 1
  5954. 1
  5955. 1
  5956. 1
  5957. 1
  5958. 1
  5959. 1
  5960. 1
  5961. 1
  5962. 1
  5963. 1
  5964. 1
  5965. 1
  5966. 1
  5967. 1
  5968. 1
  5969. 1
  5970. 1
  5971. 1
  5972. 1
  5973. 1
  5974. 1
  5975. 1
  5976. 1
  5977. 1
  5978. 1
  5979. 1
  5980. 1
  5981. 1
  5982. 1
  5983. 1
  5984. 1
  5985. 1
  5986. 1
  5987. 1
  5988. 1
  5989. 1
  5990. 1
  5991. 1
  5992. 1
  5993. 1
  5994. 1
  5995. 1
  5996. 1
  5997. 1
  5998. 1
  5999. 1
  6000. 1
  6001. 1
  6002. 1
  6003. 1
  6004. 1
  6005. 1
  6006. 1
  6007. 1
  6008. 1
  6009. 1
  6010. 1
  6011. 1
  6012. 1
  6013. 1
  6014. 1
  6015. 1
  6016. 1
  6017. 1
  6018. 1
  6019. 1
  6020. 1
  6021. 1
  6022. 1
  6023. 1
  6024. 1
  6025. 1
  6026. 1
  6027. 1
  6028. 1
  6029. 1
  6030. 1
  6031. 1
  6032. 1
  6033. 1
  6034. 1
  6035. 1
  6036. 1
  6037. 1
  6038. 1
  6039. 1
  6040. 1
  6041. 1
  6042. 1
  6043. 1
  6044. 1
  6045. 1
  6046. 1
  6047. 1
  6048. 1
  6049. 1
  6050. 1
  6051. 1
  6052. 1
  6053. 1
  6054. 1
  6055. 1
  6056. 1
  6057. 1
  6058. 1
  6059. 1
  6060. 1
  6061. 1
  6062. 1
  6063. 1
  6064. 1
  6065. 1
  6066. 1
  6067. 1
  6068. 1
  6069. 1
  6070. 1
  6071. 1
  6072. 1
  6073. 1
  6074. 1
  6075. 1
  6076. 1
  6077. 1
  6078. 1
  6079. 1
  6080. 1
  6081. 1
  6082. 1
  6083. 1
  6084. 1
  6085. 1
  6086. 1
  6087. 1
  6088. 1
  6089. 1
  6090. @agapp11able ​ 1. so no source on your lie that China has most of the US debt? 2. No specifics of what ASPI got wrong in their report documenting cccl staging videos? 3. You accept Chinese state media but you refuse to accept ASPI because it’s funded by Australian government? 4. You lied that the aspi report is only words and has not pics/videos 5. You lied that you gave a source on china holding majority of US debt And you are upset people call you a CCP shill? 6. I gave you directed sources supporting that Japan has the most US debt of any country and even then, 2nd place China is just about 3-4% of total US debt. 7. You have argued that ASPI couldn't be trusted because they may have been wrong (your opinion) on 2 facilities out of 400 so they can't be trusted HOWEVER if CCP is wrong on a facility and caught staging videos, they can still be trusted!! And you wonder why people would think you are a CCP shill. LOL. 8. You lied that you gave as a source on the debt ‘Statista’ when I in fact gave you such a source from them and it proved China is 2nd among foreign owned debt and only 3-4% of the total US debt. I gave you the title of the Statista article “Major foreign holders of US treasury” and another source from investopeida while you refuse to provide the title or even quotes from the article. 9. As another source, you used The Grayzone. Mediabaisfactcheck has them as untrustworthy and far left and said of them “A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis” 10. You trust more a g/f that doctors up a video making it looked like you went to a strip club than a g/f that said she believes you went 400 times to strip club but in actuality it was just 396 times you went. 11. You demand I answer over 20 questions (most already answered) of yours or else you consider me a bot while all I ask is you support your lies and hypocrisy or else you are a bot. 12. You use Carr from Australia as a source even though he has connections to the CCP and Carr never even provides evidence that ASPI lied on the Uyghur genocide. And you wonder why people think you are a CCP shill.
    1
  6091. 1
  6092. 1
  6093. 1
  6094. @agapp11able ​ 1. so no source on your lie that China has most of the US debt? 2. No specifics of what ASPI got wrong in their report documenting cccl staging videos? 3. You accept Chinese state media but you refuse to accept ASPI because it’s funded by Australian government? 4. You lied that the aspi report is only words and has not pics/videos 5. You lied that you gave a source on china holding majority of US debt And you are upset people call you a CCP shill? 6. I gave you directed sources supporting that Japan has the most US debt of any country and even then, 2nd place China is just about 3-4% of total US debt. 7. You have argued that ASPI couldn't be trusted because they may have been wrong (your opinion) on 2 facilities out of 400 so they can't be trusted HOWEVER if CCP is wrong on a facility and caught staging videos, they can still be trusted!! And you wonder why people would think you are a CCP shill. LOL. 8. You lied that you gave as a source on the debt ‘Statista’ when I in fact gave you such a source from them and it proved China is 2nd among foreign owned debt and only 3-4% of the total US debt. I gave you the title of the Statista article “Major foreign holders of US treasury” and another source from investopeida while you refuse to provide the title or even quotes from the article. 9. As another source, you used The Grayzone. Mediabaisfactcheck has them as untrustworthy and far left and said of them “A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis” 10. You trust more a g/f that doctors up a video making it looked like you went to a strip club than a g/f that said she believes you went 400 times to strip club but in actuality it was just 396 times you went. 11. You demand I answer over 20 questions (most already answered) of yours or else you consider me a bot while all I ask is you support your lies and hypocrisy or else you are a bot. 12. You use Carr from Australia as a source even though he has connections to the CCP and Carr never even provides evidence that ASPI lied on the Uyghur genocide. 13. You argue that someone can only be against native genocide or uyghur genocide but not both And you wonder why people think you are a CCP shill.
    1
  6095. 1
  6096. 1
  6097. 1
  6098. 1
  6099. 1
  6100. 1
  6101. 1
  6102. 1
  6103. 1
  6104. 1
  6105. 1
  6106. 1
  6107. 1
  6108. 1
  6109. 1
  6110. 1
  6111. 1
  6112. 1
  6113. 1
  6114. 1
  6115. 1
  6116. 1
  6117. 1
  6118. 1
  6119. 1
  6120. 1
  6121. 1
  6122. 1
  6123. 1
  6124. 1
  6125. 1
  6126. 1
  6127. 1
  6128. 1
  6129. 1
  6130. 1
  6131. 1
  6132. 1
  6133. 1
  6134. 1
  6135. 1
  6136. 1
  6137. 1
  6138. 1
  6139. 1
  6140. 1
  6141. 1
  6142. 1
  6143. 1
  6144. 1
  6145. 1
  6146. 1
  6147. 1
  6148. 1
  6149. 1
  6150. 1
  6151. 1
  6152. 1
  6153. 1
  6154. 1
  6155. 1
  6156. 1
  6157. 1
  6158. 1
  6159. 1
  6160. 1
  6161. 1
  6162. 1
  6163. 1
  6164. 1
  6165. 1
  6166. 1
  6167. 1
  6168. 1
  6169. 1
  6170. 1
  6171. 1
  6172. 1
  6173. 1
  6174. 1
  6175. 1
  6176. 1
  6177. 1
  6178. 1
  6179. 1
  6180. 1
  6181. 1
  6182. 1
  6183. 1
  6184. 1
  6185. 1
  6186. 1
  6187. 1
  6188. 1
  6189. 1
  6190. 1
  6191. 1
  6192. 1
  6193. 1
  6194. 1
  6195. 1
  6196. 1
  6197. 1
  6198. 1
  6199. 1
  6200. 1
  6201. 1
  6202. 1
  6203. 1
  6204. 1
  6205. 1
  6206. 1
  6207. 1
  6208. 1
  6209. 1
  6210. 1
  6211. 1
  6212. 1
  6213. 1
  6214. 1
  6215. 1
  6216. 1
  6217. 1
  6218. 1
  6219. 1
  6220. 1
  6221. 1
  6222. 1
  6223. 1
  6224. 1
  6225. 1
  6226. 1
  6227. 1
  6228. 1
  6229. 1
  6230. 1
  6231. 1
  6232. 1
  6233. 1
  6234. 1
  6235. 1
  6236. 1
  6237. 1
  6238. 1
  6239. 1
  6240. 1
  6241. 1
  6242. 1
  6243. 1
  6244. 1
  6245. 1
  6246. 1
  6247. 1
  6248. 1
  6249. 1
  6250. 1
  6251. 1
  6252. 1
  6253. 1
  6254. 1
  6255. 1
  6256. 1
  6257. 1
  6258. 1
  6259. 1
  6260. 1
  6261. 1
  6262. 1
  6263. 1
  6264. 1
  6265. 1
  6266. 1
  6267. 1
  6268. 1
  6269. 1
  6270. 1
  6271. 1
  6272. 1
  6273. 1
  6274. 1
  6275. 1
  6276. 1
  6277. 1
  6278. 1
  6279. 1
  6280. 1
  6281. 1
  6282. 1
  6283. 1
  6284. 1
  6285. 1
  6286. 1
  6287. 1
  6288. 1
  6289. 1
  6290. 1
  6291. 1
  6292. 1
  6293. 1
  6294.  @kimcarrier9834  “China Is Running Out of Water and That’s Scary for Asia” “Yet China’s natural abundance is a thing of the past. As Michael Beckley and I argue in our forthcoming book, “The Danger Zone,” Beijing has blown through many of its resources. A decade ago, China became the world’s largest importer of agricultural goods. Its arable land has been shrinking due to degradation and overuse. Breakneck development has also made China the world’s largest energy importer: It buys three-quarters of its oil abroad at a time when America has become a net energy exporter. China’s water situation is particularly grim. As Gopal Reddy notes, China possesses 20% of the world’s population but only 7% of its fresh water. Entire regions, especially in the north, suffer from water scarcity worse than that found in a parched Middle East.” “Thousands of rivers have disappeared, while industrialization and pollution have spoiled much of the water that remains. By some estimates, 80% to 90% of China’s groundwater and half of its river water is too dirty to drink; more than half of its groundwater and one-quarter of its river water cannot even be used for industry or farming.” “This is an expensive problem. China is forced to divert water from comparatively wet regions to the drought-plagued north; experts assess that the country loses well over $100 billion annually as a result of water scarcity. Shortages and unsustainable agriculture are causing the desertification of large chunks of land. Water-related energy shortfalls have become common across the country.” “By building a series of giant dams on the Mekong River, Beijing has triggered recurring droughts and devastating floods in Southeast Asian countries such as Thailand and Laos that depend on that waterway. The diversion of rivers in Xinjiang has had devastating downstream effects in Central Asia.” “In other words, the thirstier China is, the more geopolitically nasty it could get.”
    1
  6295. 1
  6296. 1
  6297. 1
  6298. 1
  6299. 1
  6300. 1
  6301. 1
  6302. 1
  6303. 1
  6304. 1
  6305. 1
  6306. 1
  6307. 1
  6308. 1
  6309. 1
  6310. 1
  6311. 1
  6312. 1
  6313. 1
  6314. 1
  6315. 1
  6316. 1
  6317. 1
  6318. 1
  6319. 1
  6320. 1
  6321. 1
  6322. 1
  6323. 1
  6324. 1
  6325. 1
  6326. 1
  6327. 1
  6328. 1
  6329. 1
  6330. 1
  6331. 1
  6332. 1
  6333. 1
  6334. 1
  6335. 1
  6336. 1
  6337. 1
  6338. 1
  6339. 1
  6340. 1
  6341. 1
  6342. 1
  6343. 1
  6344. 1
  6345. 1
  6346. 1
  6347. 1
  6348. 1
  6349. 1
  6350. 1
  6351. 1
  6352. 1
  6353. 1
  6354. 1
  6355. 1
  6356. 1
  6357. 1
  6358. 1
  6359. 1
  6360. 1
  6361. 1
  6362. 1
  6363. 1
  6364. 1
  6365.  @realname4401 UN pestimates and projections of China's working age population (15-64) also show China peaked around 2015 and it's been flat about 1 billion people in working age since 2015 and projected to stay flat throught about 2028 then it will nose dive and be only 800 billion by 2040. That's a 20% drop in working age population between now and 2040. I'm also certain that UN estimate was from before China admitted that their population declined and research is showing China's population may have started declining about 5 years ago. The Lowy Institute also measured "Chinese Productivity Growth". The graph I saw was for "Total factor productivity; smoothed trend". Total factor productivity is a measure of productive efficiency in that it measures how much output can be produced from a certain amount of inputs. They show that China's total factor productivity was around 2.5% in early 80's when they opened up, peaked around 5% in mid 80's, gradually declined to about 4.5% by late 90's then has been falling since then and from about 2015-2020 it's been around 1.7%. Another metric is "Capital needed to generate $1 of GDP growth in China". 1991-2007, it averaged (adjusted for inflation) $3.90 to generate $1 of GDP growth. In 2019, it was nearly $8. The point is that China has a lot of debt that is going to hinder growth and more debt isn't going to have anywhere near the amount of return as it did in the past. This is why Lowy Institute said: - China will likely experience a substantial long-term growth slowdown owing to demographic decline, the limits of capital-intensive growth, and a gradual deceleration in productivity growth. - Even with continued broad policy success, our baseline projections suggest annual economic growth will slow to about 3% by 2030 and 2% by 2040, while averaging 2–3% overall from now until 2050. - China would still become the world’s largest economy, but it would never enjoy a meaningful lead over the US and would remain far less prosperous and productive per person even by mid-century. That was from March 2022.
    1
  6366. 1
  6367. 1
  6368. 1
  6369. 1
  6370. 1
  6371. 1
  6372. 1
  6373. 1
  6374. 1
  6375. 1
  6376. 1
  6377. 1
  6378. 1
  6379. 1
  6380. 1
  6381. 1
  6382. 1
  6383. 1
  6384. 1
  6385. 1
  6386. 1
  6387. 1
  6388. 1
  6389. 1
  6390. 1
  6391. 1
  6392. 1
  6393. 1
  6394. 1
  6395. 1
  6396. 1
  6397. 1
  6398. 1
  6399. 1
  6400. 1
  6401. 1
  6402. 1
  6403. 1
  6404. 1
  6405. 1
  6406. 1
  6407. 1
  6408. 1
  6409. 1
  6410. 1
  6411. 1
  6412. 1
  6413. 1
  6414. 1
  6415. 1
  6416. 1
  6417. 1
  6418. 1
  6419. 1
  6420. 1
  6421. 1
  6422. 1
  6423. 1
  6424. 1
  6425. 1
  6426. 1
  6427. 1
  6428. 1
  6429. 1
  6430. 1
  6431. 1
  6432. 1
  6433. 1
  6434. 1
  6435. 1
  6436. 1
  6437. 1
  6438. 1
  6439. 1
  6440. 1
  6441. 1
  6442. 1
  6443. 1
  6444. 1
  6445. 1
  6446. 1
  6447. 1
  6448. 1
  6449. 1
  6450. 1
  6451. 1
  6452. 1
  6453. 1
  6454. 1
  6455. 1
  6456. 1
  6457. 1
  6458. 1
  6459. 1
  6460. 1
  6461. 1
  6462. 1
  6463. 1
  6464. 1
  6465. 1
  6466. 1
  6467. 1
  6468. 1
  6469. 1
  6470. 1
  6471. 1
  6472. 1
  6473. 1
  6474. 1
  6475. 1
  6476. 1
  6477. 1
  6478. 1
  6479. 1
  6480. 1
  6481. 1
  6482. 1
  6483. 1
  6484. 1
  6485. 1
  6486. 1
  6487. 1
  6488. 1
  6489. 1
  6490. 1
  6491. 1
  6492. 1
  6493. 1
  6494. 1
  6495. 1
  6496. 1
  6497. 1
  6498. 1
  6499. 1
  6500. 1
  6501. 1
  6502. 1
  6503. 1
  6504. 1
  6505. 1
  6506. 1
  6507. 1
  6508. 1
  6509. 1
  6510. 1
  6511. 1
  6512. 1
  6513. 1
  6514. 1
  6515.  @Stellar_Politics  “And there we have it, a person unable to think critically” and then “You could've just clicked on my profile and realized I'm a Marxian content creator,” So it all makes sense… a communist defending communist North Korea! Wow, you really got me by proving to me your extreme bias and support for a horrible ideology. “I've made a few videos on the DPRK because even if we're to be against them, the western media doesn't do the people any favors when it spreads misinformation” You mean how I’ve argued in this threat that this video is too much fear mongering and that even Kim isn’t likely to be as crazy as suggested in this video? Or was it the fact you refuse to admit that Russia would likely have taken over South Korea as well either directly or indirectly and South Korea would be as poor and terrible as NK? “We're talking about the media that decided to say the north claimed to have discovered a unicorn when the truth to the story was that the north was celebrating the dynastic history of early Korea which involved a myth of a unicorn.” Oh, I know how you authoritarian communist like to debate. So on the unicorn, the media posts the facts that “Korean news agency say they have 'recently reconfirmed' the lair of one of the unicorns ridden by the ancient King Tongmyong”. But since maybe some media took it too far, it’s somehow means North Korean government isn’t often saying crazy things or acting very irrational? And then that’s your way to then defend the horrible regime of North Korea – that it’s just western media fault?!? “The fact that you can't comprehend any level of criticism against a country” South Korea is flawed but its still better than 90% of the countries out there. Why can’t you admit that South Korea is a success story that lead to it becoming a wealthy nation, a democracy, and strong human rights? No country is perfect so don’t give me this “why can’t you take criticism of South Korea!” “How foolish you are to dismiss the elderly who are being neglected by the south government and forced to go homeless,” Still one of the top 30 countries in the world in the quality of care the people receive. How does that compare to North Korea where millions have died of starvation? How does it compare to communist China under Mao where 50 million were killed either in famine or cultural revolution? So you’re only argument is that South Korea is flawed – but that doesn’t mean it’s still not one of the most successful stories and better countries in the world. Unless, of course, you’re a communist that doesn’t like people having freedoms or any wealth or rights?
    1
  6516. 1
  6517. 1
  6518. 1
  6519. 1
  6520. 1
  6521. 1
  6522. 1
  6523. 1
  6524. 1
  6525. 1
  6526. 1
  6527. 1
  6528. 1
  6529. 1
  6530. 1
  6531. 1
  6532. 1
  6533. 1
  6534. 1
  6535. 1
  6536. 1
  6537. 1
  6538. 1
  6539. 1
  6540. 1
  6541. 1
  6542. 1
  6543. 1
  6544. 1
  6545. 1
  6546. 1
  6547. 1
  6548. 1
  6549. 1
  6550. 1
  6551. 1
  6552. 1
  6553. 1
  6554. 1
  6555. 1
  6556. 1
  6557. 1
  6558. 1
  6559. 1
  6560. 1
  6561. 1
  6562. 1
  6563. 1
  6564. 1
  6565. 1
  6566. 1
  6567. 1
  6568. 1
  6569. 1
  6570. 1
  6571. 1
  6572. 1
  6573. 1
  6574. 1
  6575. 1
  6576. 1
  6577. 1
  6578. 1
  6579. 1
  6580. 1
  6581. 1
  6582. 1
  6583. 1
  6584. 1
  6585. 1
  6586. 1
  6587. 1
  6588. 1
  6589. 1
  6590. 1
  6591. 1
  6592. 1
  6593. 1
  6594. 1
  6595. 1
  6596. 1
  6597. 1
  6598. 1
  6599. 1
  6600. 1
  6601. 1
  6602. 1
  6603. 1
  6604. 1
  6605. 1
  6606. 1
  6607. 1
  6608. 1
  6609. 1
  6610. 1
  6611. 1
  6612. 1
  6613. 1
  6614. 1
  6615. 1
  6616. 1
  6617. 1
  6618. 1
  6619. 1
  6620. 1
  6621. 1
  6622. 1
  6623. 1
  6624. 1
  6625. 1
  6626. 1
  6627. 1
  6628. 1
  6629. 1
  6630. 1
  6631. 1
  6632. 1
  6633. 1
  6634. 1
  6635. 1
  6636. 1
  6637. 1
  6638. 1
  6639. 1
  6640. 1
  6641. 1
  6642. 1
  6643. 1
  6644. 1
  6645. 1
  6646. 1
  6647. 1
  6648. 1
  6649. 1
  6650. 1
  6651. 1
  6652. 1
  6653. 1
  6654. 1
  6655. 1
  6656. 1
  6657. 1
  6658. 1
  6659. 1
  6660. 1
  6661. 1
  6662. 1
  6663. 1
  6664. 1
  6665. 1
  6666. 1
  6667. 1
  6668. 1
  6669. 1
  6670. 1
  6671. 1
  6672. 1
  6673. 1
  6674. 1
  6675. 1
  6676. 1
  6677. 1
  6678. 1
  6679. 1
  6680. 1
  6681. 1
  6682. 1
  6683. 1
  6684. 1
  6685. 1
  6686. 1
  6687. 1
  6688. 1
  6689. 1
  6690. 1
  6691. 1
  6692. 1
  6693. 1
  6694. 1
  6695. 1
  6696. 1
  6697. 1
  6698. 1
  6699. 1
  6700. 1
  6701. 1
  6702. 1
  6703. 1
  6704. 1
  6705. 1
  6706. 1
  6707. 1
  6708. 1
  6709. 1
  6710. 1
  6711. 1
  6712. 1
  6713. 1
  6714. 1
  6715. 1
  6716. 1
  6717. 1
  6718. 1
  6719. 1
  6720. 1
  6721. 1
  6722. 1
  6723. 1
  6724. 1
  6725. 1
  6726. 1
  6727. 1
  6728. 1
  6729. 1
  6730. 1
  6731. 1
  6732. 1
  6733. 1
  6734. 1
  6735. 1
  6736. 1
  6737. 1
  6738. 1
  6739. 1
  6740. 1
  6741. 1
  6742. 1
  6743. 1
  6744. 1
  6745. 1
  6746. 1
  6747. 1
  6748. 1
  6749. 1
  6750. 1
  6751. 1
  6752. 1
  6753. 1
  6754. 1
  6755. 1
  6756. 1
  6757. 1
  6758. 1
  6759. 1
  6760. 1
  6761. 1
  6762. 1
  6763. 1
  6764. 1
  6765. 1
  6766. 1
  6767. 1
  6768. 1
  6769. 1
  6770. 1
  6771. 1
  6772. 1
  6773. 1
  6774. 1
  6775. 1
  6776. 1
  6777. 1
  6778. 1
  6779. 1
  6780. 1
  6781. 1
  6782. 1
  6783. 1
  6784. 1
  6785. 1
  6786. 1
  6787. 1
  6788. 1
  6789. 1
  6790. 1
  6791. 1
  6792. 1
  6793. 1
  6794. 1
  6795. 1
  6796. 1
  6797. 1
  6798. 1
  6799. 1
  6800. 1
  6801. 1
  6802. 1
  6803. 1
  6804. 1
  6805. 1
  6806. 1
  6807. 1
  6808. 1
  6809. 1
  6810. 1
  6811. 1
  6812. 1
  6813. 1
  6814. 1
  6815. 1
  6816. 1
  6817. 1
  6818. 1
  6819. 1
  6820. 1
  6821. 1
  6822. 1
  6823. 1
  6824. 1
  6825. 1
  6826. 1
  6827. 1
  6828. 1
  6829. 1
  6830. 1
  6831. 1
  6832. 1
  6833. 1
  6834. 1
  6835. 1
  6836. 1
  6837. 1
  6838. 1
  6839. 1
  6840. 1
  6841. 1
  6842. 1
  6843. 1
  6844. 1
  6845. 1
  6846. 1
  6847. 1
  6848. 1
  6849. 1
  6850. 1
  6851. 1
  6852. 1
  6853. 1
  6854. 1
  6855. 1
  6856. 1
  6857. 1
  6858. 1
  6859. 1
  6860. 1
  6861. 1
  6862. 1
  6863. 1
  6864. 1
  6865. 1
  6866. 1
  6867. 1
  6868. 1
  6869. 1
  6870. 1
  6871. 1
  6872. 1
  6873. 1
  6874. 1
  6875. 1
  6876. 1
  6877. 1
  6878. 1
  6879. 1
  6880. 1
  6881. 1
  6882. 1
  6883. 1
  6884. 1
  6885. 1
  6886. 1
  6887. 1
  6888. 1
  6889. 1
  6890. 1
  6891. 1
  6892. 1
  6893. 1
  6894. 1
  6895. 1
  6896. 1
  6897. 1
  6898. 1
  6899. 1
  6900. 1
  6901. 1
  6902. 1
  6903. 1
  6904. 1
  6905. 1
  6906. 1
  6907. 1
  6908. 1
  6909. 1
  6910. 1
  6911. 1
  6912. 1
  6913. 1
  6914. 1
  6915. 1
  6916. 1
  6917. 1
  6918. 1
  6919. 1
  6920. 1
  6921. 1
  6922. 1
  6923. 1
  6924. 1
  6925. 1
  6926. 1
  6927. 1
  6928. 1
  6929. 1
  6930. 1
  6931. 1
  6932. 1
  6933. 1
  6934. 1
  6935. 1
  6936. 1
  6937. 1
  6938. 1
  6939. 1
  6940. 1
  6941. 1
  6942. 1
  6943. 1
  6944. 1
  6945. 1
  6946. 1
  6947. 1
  6948. 1
  6949. 1
  6950. 1
  6951. 1
  6952. 1
  6953. 1
  6954. 1
  6955. 1
  6956. 1
  6957. 1
  6958. 1
  6959. 1
  6960. 1
  6961. 1
  6962. 1
  6963. 1
  6964. 1
  6965. 1
  6966. 1
  6967. 1
  6968. 1
  6969. 1
  6970. 1
  6971. 1
  6972. 1
  6973. 1
  6974. 1
  6975. 1
  6976. 1
  6977. 1
  6978. 1
  6979. 1
  6980. 1
  6981. 1
  6982. 1
  6983. 1
  6984. 1
  6985. 1
  6986. 1
  6987. 1
  6988. 1
  6989. 1
  6990. 1
  6991. 1
  6992. 1
  6993. 1
  6994. 1
  6995. 1
  6996. 1
  6997. 1
  6998. 1
  6999. 1
  7000. 1
  7001. 1
  7002. 1
  7003. 1
  7004. 1
  7005. 1
  7006. 1
  7007. 1
  7008. 1
  7009. 1
  7010. 1
  7011. 1
  7012. 1
  7013. 1
  7014. 1
  7015. 1
  7016. 1
  7017. 1
  7018. 1
  7019. 1
  7020. 1
  7021. 1
  7022. 1
  7023. 1
  7024. 1
  7025. 1
  7026. 1
  7027. 1
  7028. 1
  7029. 1
  7030. 1
  7031. 1
  7032. 1
  7033. 1
  7034. 1
  7035. 1
  7036. 1
  7037. 1
  7038. 1
  7039. 1
  7040. 1
  7041. 1
  7042. 1
  7043. 1
  7044. 1
  7045. 1
  7046. 1
  7047. 1
  7048. 1
  7049. 1
  7050. 1
  7051. 1
  7052. 1
  7053. 1
  7054. 1
  7055. 1
  7056. 1
  7057. 1
  7058. 1
  7059. 1
  7060. 1
  7061. 1
  7062. 1
  7063. 1
  7064. 1
  7065. 1
  7066. 1
  7067. 1
  7068. 1
  7069. 1
  7070. 1
  7071. 1
  7072. 1
  7073. 1
  7074. 1
  7075. 1
  7076. 1
  7077. 1
  7078. 1
  7079. 1
  7080. 1
  7081. 1
  7082. 1
  7083. 1
  7084. 1
  7085. 1
  7086. 1
  7087. 1
  7088. 1
  7089. 1
  7090. 1
  7091. 1
  7092. 1
  7093. 1
  7094. 1
  7095. 1
  7096. 1
  7097. 1
  7098. 1
  7099. 1
  7100. 1
  7101. 1
  7102. 1
  7103. 1
  7104. 1
  7105. 1
  7106. 1
  7107. 1
  7108. 1
  7109. 1
  7110. 1
  7111. 1
  7112. 1
  7113. 1
  7114. 1
  7115. 1
  7116. 1
  7117. 1
  7118. 1
  7119. 1
  7120. 1
  7121. 1
  7122. 1
  7123. 1
  7124. 1
  7125. 1
  7126. 1
  7127. 1
  7128. 1
  7129. 1
  7130. 1
  7131. 1
  7132. 1
  7133. 1
  7134. 1
  7135. 1
  7136. 1
  7137. 1
  7138. 1
  7139. 1
  7140. 1
  7141. 1
  7142. 1
  7143. 1
  7144. 1
  7145. 1
  7146. 1
  7147. 1
  7148. 1
  7149. 1
  7150. 1
  7151. 1
  7152. 1
  7153. 1
  7154. 1
  7155. 1
  7156. 1
  7157. 1
  7158. 1
  7159. 1
  7160. 1
  7161. 1
  7162. 1
  7163. 1
  7164. 1
  7165. 1
  7166. 1
  7167. 1
  7168. 1
  7169. 1
  7170. 1
  7171. 1
  7172. 1
  7173. 1
  7174. 1
  7175. 1
  7176. 1
  7177. 1
  7178. 1
  7179. 1
  7180. 1
  7181. 1
  7182. 1
  7183. 1
  7184. 1
  7185. 1
  7186. 1
  7187. 1
  7188. 1
  7189. 1
  7190. 1
  7191. 1
  7192. 1
  7193. 1
  7194. 1
  7195. 1
  7196. 1
  7197. 1
  7198. 1
  7199. 1
  7200. 1
  7201. 1
  7202. 1
  7203. 1
  7204. 1
  7205. 1
  7206. 1
  7207.  @skydragon23101979  > Your number one point is invalid you never pointed out why they wanted protection against the chinese. Invalid because Choon said so. And you just confirmed that they do want protection by asking me why they want protection. Can Choon make up his mind? You’re now agreeing they do want protection but disagreeing on why? And your argument is saying that if someone wants help from the US, they are a vassal? Wow, what an easy way to ‘win’ a debate! > best evidence for that is the recent leak The leaks that showed CN is working with RU regarding CN sending them support such as arms? Okay, good that you agree. I don’t know how you got that the US coerced them by eavesdropping but considering Choon said Europe is coerced to cooperate while at the same arguing that ASEAN isn’t coerced because cooperation means they aren’t coerced. > Nope I never said Europe is being coerced I said Europe is blindly following the position of the US without consideration of their interests. Marcon, who you defended, literally argued they are pressured to follow the US. Are you saying Macron is wrong? You literally argued that Europe needs more self-autonomy which is suggesting they forced to cooperate. Otherwise, Europe is doing EXACTLY what it wants. > ) I already said Asean made a statement clearly you can google I told you I did and was not able to find it. Why can’t you find it? Your VPN is clearly working. > Nope i never said starting point is whatever China said You’re right, if someone doesn’t say they did something, it means they didn’t do that. So If I said Choon is 5yr old brain, don’t reply back that I said Choon is not smart. > without diplomatic communications, it always reverts to law of the jungle whoever is stronger militarily gains No it doesn’t. It means that Choon believe that CN positions are valid all the time and if anyone disagrees, they have to negotiate with CN. So if CN declares tomorrow the Sea of Japan belongs to CN, then anyone that wants to use it must get approval from CN. Which other country is hitting fishing ships in the region at the rate CN does? This is also the CN that illegally sends it’s fishing ships into the economic waters of South America. > International community voted against China? where did you get that info? I have not heard of any international organisations that voted against China. Maybe because SeeSeePee doesn’t allow coverage of that. It was from the United Nations. Specifically from the Law of the Sea Treaty… is an international agreement that establishes a legal framework for all marine and maritime activities. As of June 2016, 167 countries and the European Union are parties. > That’s your perspective No, you are literally defending everything about CN. > why don’t you tell me from Europe’s perspective why does it benefit for Europe to be involved in the affairs of the south China sea or Taiwan and making an enemy of China? Why didn’t you answer how CN benefits acting as part of the axis of ev1|. 80% of world trade goes though the East Vietnam Sea including lots of trade that ends up in Europe. TW also has 80% of Chips and war would cause a major shortage leading to economic disaster. And last, EU is asking the world to help against RU so EU needs to help others in order to ever get support. > )Nope my arguments are based on facts and pragmatic solutions You mean based on the assumption that any position CN takes must be accepted and if one doesn’t, CN is in the right to use force against them. > Nope what I am saying is that you let the countries involved decide for themselves No, you have consistently argued that the US should stay out of the region. So, CN is allowed to be bully but US or anyone else cannot or should not help those bullied – that’s the argument Choon made. > South Korea, Japan, and Philippines have US bases those bases are there since after WW2 Yes, literally to contain CN. And SK, Japan and Philippines are free to kick the US out but instead they have continued to allow the bases and even expanded. Philippines just did a few weeks ago. > Singapore does not have ZuS base Changi Naval Base is open to the US and UK and just this year they opened it up to India. No China. Why? Funny how US, UK and India are all 3 countries trying to contain CN. Coincidence?
    1
  7208.  @skydragon23101979  In summary, here are the contradictions and bad arguments made by Choon: New to the list: 1. States that my point in asking why ASEAN and EAST Asia want support at least in a part to defend against CN because I didn’t state why they wanted protection. Thus arguing that they do indeed all want US prescensse and support but you are not sure if it’s for CN or someone else. At the same time you said it wrong for US to be in the region. 2. Argued that anyone seeking support from US is v@ss@l and not acting out of their own interest. Thus no one has agency if they ask for help unless it’s help from CN like RU is doing. 3. US leaks show CN is doing arms deals with RU 4. Choon agreed with Marcon was describing how Europe is pressured (i.e. coerced) to cooperate with the US but then say ASEAN could not be coerced because cooperation means no coercion. Choon literally argued Europe needs more self-autonomy which is suggesting they forced to cooperate. Otherwise, Europe is doing EXACTLY what it wants. 5. Unable to provide me source that ASEAN said they clearly do not want external interference regarding their affairs. And could not explain why they are working with the US or have US bases if they don’t want external interference. 6. Argued that if someone doesn’t literally admit to using a certain tactic or doesn’t admit to saying a specific thing, it means they are not doing that at all. Thus Choon is 5 yr old brain – I’m not arguing anything about intelligence, right? Because I didn’t use the word intelligence. 7. Continues to argue that all CN positions are valid and must be respected. Anyone tht does not respect that position, CN is in the right to use force. But others cannot do the same and for example destroy the bases of CN in the West Philippine Sea. 8. UN ruled against China’s claims and actions against Phillipne. Yet Choon thinks CN is in the right to continue to @tt@ck anyone that goes in that area. 9. Choon argues that SK, Japan and Philippines have no agency and can not ask for US support so the argument Choon makes all the time is no one can ask for help, it’s only forced on them. You are right thought that the US doesn’t have a base in TW, they just have troops. 10. Singapore allows their base to be use by US, UK and India – all countries trying to contain CN. But they don’t allow CN. Why is that? And also: 1. Unable to say why all those countries in East Asia and ASEAN want support against CN. 2. ASEAN is cooperating and not coerced into cooperating with CN because cooperation only happens if not coerced....but Europe is forced into cooperating with US because cooperation can be coerced. 3. Without a source or quote from ASEAN, ASEAN said they are clearly do not want external interference regarding their affairs all while ASEAN is indeed working with the US. 4. Argued that the starting point to the East Vietnam Sea is whatever position CN takes and THEN one has to discuss/negotiate with CN. 5. Blamed Philippines for CN attacking their boats even thought an international community voted against CN. 6. Is interested in defending CN & RU while pretending to care what’s best for Europe. 7. All of your arguments are that CN is right about everything and thus anyone that doesn't bow to their demands, it will be their fault if CN acts with military or other means. 8. Says that the US and world should not get involved in other countries issues while CN is allowed to become THE issue for other countries. 9. still refuses to say why SK, Japan, Taiwan, Phillipines and Singore have US bases and why Vietnam is working with the US -- all in part to contain CN.
    1
  7209. 1
  7210. 1
  7211. 1
  7212. 1
  7213. 1
  7214. 1
  7215. 1
  7216. 1
  7217. 1
  7218. 1
  7219. 1
  7220. 1
  7221. 1
  7222.  @XiaoPangZi  Great famine. Holdomor and Soviet famine. Gulags. North Korea famine. >When it comes to Vietnam though the only mistake was giving up. No one today would argue that fighting with SKorea was bad, today NK is a horrible place Yes. But also, it was too much of a cost for Americans. It dragged on for far longer than the US involvement in Korea. Defending SK also had more justification -- there was a treaty and it was broken by the North when they invaded. >If USA had not given up and kept on defending SVietnam there might today have been a very rich, technologically superior souther Vietnamese ally. I agree. I have been having this debate for over a week on this channel with a person from Vietnam that defends Russia. It was the weakest arguments I've seen. He will say he's not defending Russia in Ukraine but each time brings up things to blame the west. He says he overall supports Russia because they are an ally -- but even after I pointed out that Russia will support China over Vietnam in a conflict that is number one concern for Vietnam, he acknowledged that was true and yet says they are some he has faith in. At the same time, when I pointed out all the US is doing to contain China and defend Vietnam and others in that region, he was ungrateful and said 'So? they are still expanding so US cannot be tr1usted". He also tried to defend his support for Russia by criticiing the US and saying "they don't have their allies back. Look how they didn't help Argentina in 1982 Falkland". I pointed out to him that Argentina wansn't the ally, the UK was. I also pointed out that Russia cannot be counted on at all because they have a defense agreement with Armenia and didn't come to their defense. Then he just pivoted to "US didnt' come to support the UK in 1982 and UK is part of NATO, so how can any have tr1ust in them?!". Then I pointed out that the UK didn't ask for support and NATO specifically says that nothing in the southern hemisphere will be included in article 5 clause where members are to help each other if attacked. That exclusion of the south and some other areas was because it was not meant to defend colonies in 1940s when it was written. After a while I asked him he likes that northern vietnam won over south vietnam despite the fact that northern vietnam from the 1950's until the end of the war in 1970's were specifically "eliminating" (from life) 220,000 civilans and the fact that by the late 1980's, Vietnam started to ditch actual communist policies. He said he supports NViet because he is glad Viet didn't become a p^^üpp^^et of the US or any other nation. Which I then point to the fact that if Vietnam would have been alied with the US, they would have been as rich as Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan plus have all those rights. He just said Vietnam is better off but no longer able to keep finding excuses. That's a long way for me to say that 100% sure Vietnam would have been better off yet the people just follow whatever their government says because their government is one responsible for all the news they get. >When it comes to Afghanistan again the only mistake was pulling out the troops. Going in was not a mistake but I do think it was too much cost for the US to keep going once Taliban made a resurgence around 2010. The government was just too c0rrupt and the country is too fractured into tribes. >Iraq was a mistake. I agree. I was against it then mostly because I kept thinking if our allies in Europe are not that sure Iraq has WMDs, then maybe Bush is wrong and we should start a wár with that much uncertainty. Huessein was bád and I do think in the long run it will be good for Iraq they they no longer have a brütál dictátõr. They already are better off today than 2002 but it did come at a big cost for the US and Iraqi people.
    1
  7223. 1
  7224. 1
  7225. 1
  7226. 1
  7227. 1
  7228. 1
  7229. 1
  7230. 1
  7231. 1
  7232. 1
  7233. 1
  7234. 1
  7235. 1
  7236. 1
  7237. 1
  7238. 1
  7239. 1
  7240. 1
  7241. 1
  7242. 1
  7243. 1
  7244. 1
  7245. 1
  7246. 1
  7247. 1
  7248. 1
  7249. 1
  7250. 1
  7251. 1
  7252. 1
  7253. 1
  7254. 1
  7255.  @mars7304  I think you 100% hit the nail on the head. I often feel like I really understand a situation but can't put it in writing -- then you wrote exactly what I was trying to convey. There are few things in science that are near 100% true. There are often conditions (under these conditions...) or a probability that isn't 100%. if something is believed to be true with 95% certain, I'm going to with that. But if it weren't for the right wingers going crazy, I would keep in mind that it's 95% certain and not 100% leaving room for some minor doubt. When one side starts acting dishonestly and hunkers down on positions that would be the minority (the 5% instead of the 95% ), it causes the other side to also dig in more than they otherwise would have. It's a whole mess that goes well beyond just science. It affects so much of politics. Just 'facts' about anything. This is where people spreading conspiracy theories come from. It's the idea that the facts don't matter but you will believe what you want to believe. So something non-science related, let's say Trump did X and there is 90% certainty he did it and Biden did Y but only 10% certainty he did that. Many right wingers will assume Trump is innocent of X because of that 10% possibility (they wont' even consider there's a chance he's guilty) and will assume Biden is guilty despite 90% chance he's not. Same is happening with vaccines. There is that tiny chance that something bad might happen and they decide that the tiny change of that bad things means that vaccines don't work and are dangerous. I honestly don't know if things will ever improve. The more that the right goes to the right and becomes ideological, the more the left is doing it as well. I get called right winger by the far left and I get called a socialist by the right wing. In reality, I'm very progressive socially and moderate left fiscally. I use to be very left fiscally but then went and got my MBA and had time in the work environment and started to realize my economic beliefs before we mostly based on wishful thinking. I became moderate to even moderate right on fiscal issues -- but the right went insane in the past 10 years and either I shifted more left as a response or I stayed the same but the moderate right moved to my right. Or both. My point being is that I was more flexible and now I feel I'm hunkering down on positions that should have more flexibility.
    1
  7256. 1
  7257. 1
  7258. 1
  7259. 1
  7260. 1
  7261. 1
  7262. 1
  7263. 1
  7264. 1
  7265. 1
  7266. 1
  7267. 1
  7268. 1
  7269. 1
  7270. 1
  7271. 1
  7272. 1
  7273. 1
  7274. 1
  7275. 1
  7276. 1
  7277. 1
  7278. 1
  7279. 1
  7280. 1
  7281. 1
  7282. 1
  7283. 1
  7284. 1
  7285. 1
  7286. 1
  7287. 1
  7288. 1
  7289. 1
  7290. 1
  7291. 1
  7292. 1
  7293. 1
  7294. 1
  7295. 1
  7296. 1
  7297. 1
  7298. 1
  7299. 1
  7300. 1
  7301. 1
  7302. 1
  7303. 1
  7304. 1
  7305. 1
  7306. 1
  7307. 1
  7308. 1
  7309. 1
  7310. 1
  7311. 1
  7312. 1
  7313. 1
  7314. 1
  7315. 1
  7316. 1
  7317. 1
  7318. 1
  7319. 1
  7320. 1
  7321. 1
  7322. 1
  7323. 1
  7324. 1
  7325. 1
  7326. 1
  7327. 1
  7328. 1
  7329. 1
  7330. 1
  7331. 1
  7332. 1
  7333. 1
  7334. 1
  7335. 1
  7336. 1
  7337. 1
  7338. 1
  7339. 1
  7340. 1
  7341. 1
  7342. 1
  7343. 1
  7344. 1
  7345. 1
  7346. 1
  7347. 1
  7348. 1
  7349. 1
  7350. 1
  7351. 1
  7352. 1
  7353. 1
  7354. 1
  7355. 1
  7356. 1
  7357. 1
  7358. 1
  7359. 1
  7360. 1
  7361. 1
  7362. 1
  7363. 1
  7364. 1
  7365. 1
  7366. 1
  7367. 1
  7368. 1
  7369. 1
  7370. 1
  7371. 1
  7372. 1
  7373. 1
  7374. 1
  7375. 1
  7376. 1
  7377. 1
  7378. 1
  7379. 1
  7380. 1
  7381. 1
  7382. 1
  7383. 1
  7384. 1
  7385. 1
  7386. 1
  7387. 1
  7388. 1
  7389. 1
  7390. 1
  7391. 1
  7392. 1
  7393. 1
  7394. 1
  7395. 1
  7396. 1
  7397. 1
  7398. 1
  7399. 1
  7400. 1
  7401. 1
  7402. 1
  7403. 1
  7404. 1
  7405. 1
  7406. 1
  7407. 1
  7408. 1
  7409. 1
  7410. 1
  7411. 1
  7412. 1
  7413. 1
  7414. 1
  7415. 1
  7416. 1
  7417. 1
  7418. 1
  7419. 1
  7420. 1
  7421. 1
  7422. 1
  7423. 1
  7424. 1
  7425. 1
  7426. 1
  7427. 1
  7428. 1
  7429. 1
  7430. 1
  7431. 1
  7432. 1
  7433. 1
  7434. 1
  7435. 1
  7436. 1
  7437. 1
  7438. 1
  7439. 1
  7440. 1
  7441.  @drumpfdon760  there is a study that calls out the typical conspiracy you vvumaos use on this topic: - One legacy of the Plaza is a sort of conspiracy theory that has continued to circulate widely in Asia. The theory is that the United States deliberately sabotaged the Japanese economy. The most common version is that the effect came via endaka, the strong yen, which priced Japanese manufacturing out of world markets.33 The idea is that the US successfully used this weapon against Japan at the Plaza in 1985, then against Korea in 1988-89, and against China in the years since 2004. - In some ways the suspicion is understandable, given the long-time pattern of pressure from the US Treasury on Asian countries to appreciate their currencies. It is true that the yen appreciated sharply against the dollar after the Plaza, more than did the European currencies. - It is also true that Japan’s GDP has mostly stagnated since 1990, after decades of strong growth. But the timing is not quite right for the conspiracy theory. In between the 1985-86 appreciation of the yen and the Japanese recessions of the 1990s came the bubble years 1987- 89, when exchange rate policy was no longer working to push the yen up, but rather to support the dollar. A variant of the conspiracy theory is that Japanese purchases of dollars during the bubble years led to excessive money growth and thereby to the soaring prices of equities and real estate in Japan. The bursting of that bubble then led to the Japanese recession. But this is virtually the opposite of the theory that the Plaza did it: buying dollars is the opposite of selling dollars.
    1
  7442. 1
  7443. 1
  7444. 1
  7445. 1
  7446. 1
  7447. 1
  7448. 1
  7449. 1
  7450. 1
  7451. 1
  7452. 1
  7453. 1
  7454. 1
  7455. 1
  7456. 1
  7457. 1
  7458. 1
  7459. 1
  7460. 1
  7461. 1
  7462. 1
  7463. 1
  7464. 1
  7465. 1
  7466. 1
  7467. 1
  7468. 1
  7469. 1
  7470. 1
  7471. 1
  7472. 1
  7473. 1
  7474. 1
  7475. 1
  7476. 1
  7477. 1
  7478. 1
  7479. 1
  7480. 1
  7481. 1
  7482. 1
  7483. 1
  7484. 1
  7485. 1
  7486. 1
  7487. 1
  7488. 1
  7489. 1
  7490. 1
  7491. 1
  7492. 1
  7493. 1
  7494. 1
  7495. 1
  7496. 1
  7497. 1
  7498. 1
  7499. 1
  7500. 1
  7501. 1
  7502. 1
  7503. 1
  7504. 1
  7505. 1
  7506. 1
  7507. 1
  7508. 1
  7509. 1
  7510. 1
  7511. 1
  7512. 1
  7513. 1
  7514. 1
  7515. 1
  7516. 1
  7517. 1
  7518. 1
  7519. 1
  7520. 1
  7521. 1
  7522.  @joaocerceau5810  " after some time, they will reach a limit in witch no company or foreign agent will just keep improving their country. After that they have develop more on their own,'". yes, that's how a country can escape the middle income trap. They need to develop their own . >China and India have a scale and a development problem on their own, I don't see that problem. A larger country means more opportunities to try things or more investment opportunities. It's far easier for a country with 1.4 billion people to develop some company or industry than a country with 50 mil, in large part because a 1.4b country has huge domestic market that can prop it up and then it could become a global company with that economy of scale they had due to 1.4 billion domestic market. Look at BYD electric vehicles. Started out selling in large volume inside of China and now spreading globally. China's problem now and moving forward has to do with some decisions they made. One child policy has lead to a population decline and a big drop in working age population with increase in elderly population is going to happen over the next few decades. Fewer workers means lower GDP potential and more elderly (to each worker) means more of the resources will be spent on economically unproductive things such as support for the elderly. China has also scared away a lot of investors in recent years under Xi. Then their housing market which was just a pyramid scheme is crumbling. It was responsible for 30%+ of GDP since 2000 but it's going to be far less going forward. India is too early too tell. They are seeing 7-8% annual GDP growth for several years now. Can they keep it up? Time will tell.
    1
  7523. 1
  7524. 1
  7525. 1
  7526. 1
  7527. 1
  7528. 1
  7529. 1
  7530. 1
  7531. 1
  7532. 1
  7533. 1
  7534. 1
  7535. 1
  7536. 1
  7537. 1
  7538. 1
  7539. 1
  7540. 1
  7541. 1
  7542. 1
  7543. 1
  7544. 1
  7545. 1
  7546. 1
  7547. 1
  7548. 1
  7549. 1
  7550. 1
  7551. 1
  7552. 1
  7553. 1
  7554. 1
  7555. 1
  7556. 1
  7557. 1
  7558. 1
  7559. 1
  7560. 1
  7561. 1
  7562. 1
  7563. 1
  7564. 1
  7565. 1
  7566. 1
  7567. 1
  7568. 1
  7569. 1
  7570. 1
  7571. 1
  7572. 1
  7573. 1
  7574. 1
  7575. 1
  7576. 1
  7577. 1
  7578. 1
  7579. 1
  7580. 1
  7581. 1
  7582. 1
  7583. 1
  7584. 1
  7585. 1
  7586. 1
  7587. 1
  7588. 1
  7589. 1
  7590. 1
  7591. 1
  7592. 1
  7593. 1
  7594. 1
  7595. 1
  7596. 1
  7597. 1
  7598. 1
  7599. 1
  7600. 1
  7601. 1
  7602. 1
  7603. 1
  7604. 1
  7605. 1
  7606. 1
  7607. 1
  7608. 1
  7609. 1
  7610. 1
  7611. 1
  7612. 1
  7613. 1
  7614. 1
  7615. 1
  7616. 1
  7617. 1
  7618. 1
  7619. 1
  7620. 1
  7621. 1
  7622. 1
  7623. 1
  7624. 1
  7625. 1
  7626. 1
  7627. 1
  7628. 1
  7629. 1
  7630. 1
  7631. 1
  7632. 1
  7633. 1
  7634. 1
  7635. 1
  7636. 1
  7637. 1
  7638. 1
  7639. 1
  7640. 1
  7641. 1
  7642. 1
  7643. 1
  7644. 1
  7645. 1
  7646. 1
  7647. 1
  7648. 1
  7649. 1
  7650. 1
  7651. 1
  7652. 1
  7653. 1
  7654. 1
  7655. 1
  7656. 1
  7657. 1
  7658. 1
  7659. 1
  7660. 1
  7661. 1
  7662. 1
  7663. 1
  7664. 1
  7665. 1
  7666. 1
  7667. 1
  7668. 1
  7669. 1
  7670. 1
  7671. 1
  7672. 1
  7673. 1
  7674. 1
  7675. 1
  7676. 1
  7677. 1
  7678. 1
  7679. 1
  7680. 1
  7681. 1
  7682. 1
  7683. 1
  7684. 1
  7685. 1
  7686. 1
  7687. 1
  7688. 1
  7689. 1
  7690. 1
  7691. 1
  7692. 1
  7693. 1
  7694. 1
  7695. 1
  7696. 1
  7697. 1
  7698. 1
  7699. 1
  7700. 1
  7701. 1
  7702. 1
  7703. 1
  7704. 1
  7705. 1
  7706. 1
  7707. 1
  7708. 1
  7709. 1
  7710. 1
  7711. 1
  7712. 1
  7713. 1
  7714. 1
  7715. 1
  7716. 1
  7717. 1
  7718. 1
  7719. 1
  7720. 1
  7721. 1
  7722. 1
  7723. 1
  7724. 1
  7725. 1
  7726. 1
  7727. 1
  7728. 1
  7729. 1
  7730. 1
  7731. 1
  7732. 1
  7733. 1
  7734. 1
  7735. 1
  7736. 1
  7737. 1
  7738. 1
  7739. 1
  7740. 1
  7741. 1
  7742. 1
  7743. 1
  7744. 1
  7745. 1
  7746. 1
  7747. 1
  7748. 1
  7749. 1
  7750. 1
  7751. 1
  7752. 1
  7753. 1
  7754. 1
  7755. 1
  7756. 1
  7757. 1
  7758. 1
  7759. 1
  7760. 1
  7761. 1
  7762. 1
  7763. 1
  7764. 1
  7765. 1
  7766. 1
  7767. 1
  7768. 1
  7769. 1
  7770. 1
  7771. 1
  7772. 1
  7773. 1
  7774. 1
  7775. 1
  7776. 1
  7777. 1
  7778. 1
  7779. 1
  7780. 1
  7781. 1
  7782. 1
  7783. 1
  7784. 1
  7785. 1
  7786. 1
  7787. 1
  7788. 1
  7789. 1
  7790. 1
  7791. 1
  7792. 1
  7793. 1
  7794. 1
  7795. 1
  7796. 1
  7797. 1
  7798. 1
  7799. 1
  7800. 1
  7801. 1
  7802. 1
  7803. 1
  7804. 1
  7805. 1
  7806. 1
  7807. 1
  7808. 1
  7809. 1
  7810. 1
  7811. 1
  7812. 1
  7813. 1
  7814. 1
  7815. 1
  7816. 1
  7817. 1
  7818. 1
  7819. 1
  7820. 1
  7821. 1
  7822. 1
  7823. 1
  7824. 1
  7825. 1
  7826. 1
  7827. 1
  7828. 1
  7829. 1
  7830. 1
  7831. 1
  7832. 1
  7833. 1
  7834. 1
  7835. 1
  7836. 1
  7837. 1
  7838. 1
  7839. 1
  7840. 1
  7841. 1
  7842. 1
  7843. 1
  7844. 1
  7845. 1
  7846. 1
  7847. 1
  7848. 1
  7849. 1
  7850. 1
  7851. 1
  7852. 1
  7853. 1
  7854. 1
  7855. 1
  7856. 1
  7857. 1
  7858. 1
  7859. 1
  7860. 1
  7861. 1
  7862. 1
  7863. 1
  7864. 1
  7865. 1
  7866. 1
  7867. ​ @文雯-o6o  I also googled how it's taught in China and I see two answers from Chinese. It's pretty much the same -- mostly reduce the US impact to the two atomic bombs and lots of emphasis on USSR. First response: - When I was in high school, the history books wrote about world war 2 like following. - Mainly divided into 2 parts, Anti-Japanese War, WW2. - For the war of resistance against Japan, it mainly describes the important points , including the 1931 incident, and then the KMT still engaged in civil war. After the events of 1937, the war stared totally. After the Nanjing Massacre, the Kuomintang organized a battle in Shanghai. Then the strategic retreat, the Pingxingguan battle, the battle of Taierzhuang, the Hundred-Regiment Campaign. After the atomic bomb was dropped, the Soviet Union invaded the northeast to repel the Japanese. The second was: - Since I spent my junior high and part of high school education in China, I think I have some first hand experience on this topic. - Chinese education divided history into 2 sections: Chinese history and World History. WW2 was mentioned in both sections. - Here is 7th grade world history section WW2 pacific theater. - The text book is public data and can be found at: - The simple translation is “In Pan-Asian theater, the people of Asia fought against Japanese aggressors who refused to surrender. US Forces fought against Japanese Empire at the sea then dropped two atomic bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Meanwhile Soviet Union declared war to Japanese empire and advanced to Northeastern China and Korean peninsula. Aug. 15th, Japanese Empire had no choice but declared surrender.” - I don’t think any other way can be more neutral and objective. - If, people in Pan Asian gave up and providing natural resources and manpower to Japanese forces, - If, Soviet Union had not advanced to Northeastern China and destroyed Japanese Northeastern China Army group, which contains 993,000 soldiers, 5,360 artillery, 1,155 tanks and about 1,800 aircraft. (USSR had to sent 1.7 million soldiers in this fight, also the last major operation in WW2, which rarely be mentioned in history book.) , - If, the US hadn’t drop two atomic bombs to Japan, the war would surely last longer and many people would die Both the above mostly reduce the US impact to just the 2 atomic bombs and no mention that 2/3 of Japanese losses were from the US in just a 3 year period. And a 3rd reply: - Here are some pictures from the history textbooks Chinese History (the old ones and the new one): - So it says it’s China and the world that defeated Japan. About world history, though I haven’t a picture, as I remembered, it’s the world that defeated the fascist too. And the overwhelming force is not the US, it’s Soviet. The US doesn’t appear much in a Chinese history textbook. - update: Just got some captures from the World History, old vision and new. To my suprise, the US appears a lot. And still, soviet appears more. So this 3rd response from a Chinese even mentions that in the older Chinese history textbook, the US doesn't appear much. So even if they said the US was the biggest factor besides China, it will get lost if they spent much more time talking about Soviets defeating Japan than US defeating Japan.
    1
  7868. ​ @文雯-o6o  On a more academic level and a longer history of how WW2 (or the whole China-Japan war that actually started earlier than WW2), this book review on "China Good War" from 2020 by historian Rana Mitter: - At issue is the traumatic period from 1931 to 1949...The Chinese have a very different picture of these events, one that has changed over time. For the first three decades of the People’s Republic, the War of Resistance against Japan (as it is called in China) was downplayed except to laud the contributions of Communist units while suppressing the major role of the national army. On at least two occasions, Mao expressed gratitude for the Japanese invasion, asserting—I think correctly—that it had made his victory over Chiang Kai-shek possible. But in the 1980s academic historians began to accord the War greater attention and respect. Officials cautiously allowed their work to seep into the wider culture. Though it took several decades more, the sacrifices and achievements of the Nationalist troops came to be more fully acknowledged. - But with this new attention came a remarkable interpretation, in which resistance to the Japanese invasion was framed as a principal—as well as the first, and the longest—part of the worldwide war against fascism. In this view, it was not the naval and amphibious conflict in the Pacific but rather the land battles in China that constituted the most important theater and were essential to the eventual triumph over Japan. The important part is that it seems that in the 1980s, China slowly began to teach the Japan/WW2 history with more acknowledgement of the actual events. My ex and the people I mentioned were in grade school in the 80’s or early 90’s. What they learned may have been very different than what a child learned in the 2000’s or what they learn today in 2023.
    1
  7869. 1
  7870. 1
  7871. 1
  7872. 1
  7873. 1
  7874. 1
  7875. 1
  7876. 1
  7877. 1
  7878. 1
  7879. 1
  7880. 1
  7881. 1
  7882. 1
  7883. 1
  7884. 1
  7885. 1
  7886. 1
  7887. 1
  7888. 1
  7889. 1
  7890. 1
  7891. 1
  7892. 1
  7893. 1
  7894. 1
  7895. 1
  7896. 1
  7897. 1
  7898. 1
  7899. 1
  7900. 1
  7901. 1
  7902. 1
  7903. 1
  7904. 1
  7905. 1
  7906. 1
  7907. 1
  7908. 1
  7909. 1
  7910. 1
  7911. 1
  7912. 1
  7913. 1
  7914. 1
  7915. 1
  7916. 1
  7917. 1
  7918. 1
  7919. 1
  7920. 1
  7921. 1
  7922. 1
  7923. 1
  7924. 1
  7925. 1
  7926. 1
  7927. 1
  7928. 1
  7929. 1
  7930. 1
  7931. 1
  7932. 1
  7933. 1
  7934. 1
  7935. 1
  7936. 1
  7937. 1
  7938. 1
  7939. 1
  7940. 1
  7941. 1
  7942. 1
  7943. 1
  7944. 1
  7945. 1
  7946. 1
  7947. 1
  7948. 1
  7949. 1
  7950. 1
  7951. 1
  7952. 1
  7953. 1
  7954. 1
  7955. 1
  7956. 1
  7957. 1
  7958. 1
  7959. 1
  7960. 1
  7961. 1
  7962. 1
  7963. 1
  7964. 1
  7965. 1
  7966. 1
  7967. 1
  7968. 1
  7969. 1
  7970. 1
  7971. 1
  7972. 1
  7973. 1
  7974. 1
  7975. 1
  7976. 1
  7977. 1
  7978. 1
  7979. 1
  7980. 1
  7981. 1
  7982. 1
  7983. 1
  7984. 1
  7985. 1
  7986. 1
  7987. 1
  7988. 1
  7989. 1
  7990. 1
  7991. 1
  7992. 1
  7993. 1
  7994. 1
  7995. 1
  7996. 1
  7997. 1
  7998. 1
  7999. 1
  8000. 1
  8001. 1
  8002. 1
  8003. 1
  8004. 1
  8005. 1
  8006. 1
  8007. 1
  8008. 1
  8009. 1
  8010. 1
  8011. 1
  8012. 1
  8013. 1
  8014. 1
  8015. 1
  8016. 1
  8017. 1
  8018. 1
  8019. 1
  8020. 1
  8021. 1
  8022. 1
  8023. 1
  8024. 1
  8025. 1
  8026. 1
  8027. 1
  8028. 1
  8029. 1
  8030. 1
  8031. 1
  8032. 1
  8033. 1
  8034. 1
  8035. 1
  8036. 1
  8037. 1
  8038. 1
  8039. 1
  8040. 1
  8041. 1
  8042. 1
  8043. 1
  8044. 1
  8045. 1
  8046. 1
  8047. 1
  8048.  @muhammadadeel8639  Saw your 2nd post. So Europe is a vassal to the American Empire, how? The US has asked them to take a bigger role in world politics. Why not support Europe becoming stronger? Literally the whole point I made before -- why aren't you supporting a stronger Europe to offset the US rather than support evil like Russia and China? "Ukraine invasion as with taiwan invasion is directly engineered by US. Russia was promised that nato would not expand let alone come to its border with nukes." And there we have it. A Russian and Chinese apologist. I now understand why you like evil. So, you're saying that Russia was right to invade? Or partially right to invade? I'll ask you a couple questions that prove that Russia didn't invade for any legit defense concerns: 1. What nuclear armed state has been invaded? 2. Did Russia sign an agreement with Ukraine that they would not invade Ukraine and will respect their sovernty if Ukraine gives up the nuclear arms? 3. Do you actually believe nuclear weaons from Finland or submarines or anywhere in NATO cannot reach Russia? 4. Why is that Putin spent the majority of his pre-invasion speech talking about how Ukraine belongs to Russia and talking about the Russian Empire as he wants to rebuild it? 5. Did Ukraine make any threats to attack Russia? 6. Do believe Russia is right to keep all the those countries around it as puppet states? A history of attempting to assassinate Ukraine leaders or bribing them to keep them as puppets. "But as a muslim, the greatest threat is the Western imposed zionist Israel that has ravaged the middle east" On China: China has 12 million people in Xinjiang living MUCH worse than Palestine that has a population of only 5 million. So Conc camps of millions of Muslims and the rest of the 12 million threatened with conc camps is somehow worse than 5 million Palestine living behind a wall? And how did US engineer China to invade Taiwan? So US is at fault for an invasion of peaceful Taiwan by China??? "Iraq, syria were were destablized as per Israel wishes" Russia literally bombed tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of Muslim Syrian civilians on purpose to help Assad who dropped chemical weapons on Muslim Syrian civilians. Wow, you think Israel is the bad guy in that situation? Wow.
    1
  8049. 1
  8050. 1
  8051. 1
  8052. 1
  8053. 1
  8054. 1
  8055. 1
  8056. 1
  8057. 1
  8058. 1
  8059. 1
  8060. 1
  8061. 1
  8062. 1
  8063. 1
  8064. 1
  8065. 1
  8066. 1
  8067. 1
  8068. 1
  8069. 1
  8070. 1
  8071. 1
  8072. 1
  8073. 1
  8074. 1
  8075. 1
  8076. 1
  8077. 1
  8078. 1
  8079. 1
  8080. 1
  8081. 1
  8082. 1
  8083. 1
  8084. 1
  8085. 1
  8086. 1
  8087. 1
  8088. 1
  8089. 1
  8090. 1
  8091. 1
  8092. 1
  8093. 1
  8094. 1
  8095. 1
  8096. 1
  8097. 1
  8098. 1
  8099. 1
  8100. 1
  8101. 1
  8102. 1
  8103. 1
  8104. 1
  8105. 1
  8106. 1
  8107. 1
  8108. 1
  8109. 1
  8110. 1
  8111. 1
  8112. 1
  8113. 1
  8114. 1
  8115. 1
  8116. 1
  8117. 1
  8118. 1
  8119. 1
  8120. 1
  8121. 1
  8122. 1
  8123. 1
  8124. 1
  8125. 1
  8126. 1
  8127. 1
  8128. 1
  8129. 1
  8130. 1
  8131. 1
  8132. 1
  8133. 1
  8134. 1
  8135. 1
  8136. 1
  8137. 1
  8138. 1
  8139. 1
  8140. 1
  8141. 1
  8142. 1
  8143. 1
  8144. 1
  8145. 1
  8146. 1
  8147. 1
  8148. 1
  8149. 1
  8150. 1
  8151. 1
  8152. 1
  8153. 1
  8154. 1
  8155. 1
  8156. 1
  8157. 1
  8158. 1
  8159. 1
  8160. 1
  8161. 1
  8162. 1
  8163. 1
  8164. 1
  8165. 1
  8166. 1
  8167. 1
  8168. 1
  8169. 1
  8170. 1
  8171. 1
  8172. 1
  8173. 1
  8174. 1
  8175. 1
  8176. 1
  8177. 1
  8178. 1
  8179. 1
  8180. 1
  8181. 1
  8182. 1
  8183. 1
  8184. 1
  8185. 1
  8186. 1
  8187. 1
  8188. 1
  8189. 1
  8190. 1
  8191. 1
  8192. 1
  8193. 1
  8194. 1
  8195. 1
  8196. 1
  8197. 1
  8198. 1
  8199. 1
  8200. 1
  8201. 1
  8202. 1
  8203. 1
  8204. 1
  8205. 1
  8206. 1
  8207. 1
  8208. 1
  8209. 1
  8210. 1
  8211. 1
  8212. 1
  8213. 1
  8214. 1
  8215. 1
  8216. 1
  8217. 1
  8218. 1
  8219. 1
  8220. 1
  8221. 1
  8222. 1
  8223. 1
  8224. 1
  8225. 1
  8226. 1
  8227. 1
  8228. 1
  8229. 1
  8230. 1
  8231. 1
  8232. 1
  8233. 1
  8234. 1
  8235. 1
  8236. 1
  8237. 1
  8238. 1
  8239. 1
  8240. 1
  8241. 1
  8242. 1
  8243. 1
  8244. 1
  8245. 1
  8246. 1
  8247. 1
  8248. 1
  8249. 1
  8250. 1
  8251. 1
  8252. 1
  8253. 1
  8254. 1
  8255. 1
  8256. 1
  8257. 1
  8258. 1
  8259. 1
  8260. 1
  8261. 1
  8262. 1
  8263. 1
  8264. 1
  8265. 1
  8266. 1
  8267. 1
  8268. 1
  8269. 1
  8270. 1
  8271. 1
  8272. 1
  8273. 1
  8274. 1
  8275. 1
  8276. 1
  8277. 1
  8278. 1
  8279. 1
  8280. 1
  8281. 1
  8282. 1
  8283. 1
  8284. 1
  8285. 1
  8286. 1
  8287. 1
  8288. 1
  8289. 1
  8290. 1
  8291. 1
  8292. 1
  8293. 1
  8294. 1
  8295. 1
  8296. 1
  8297. 1
  8298. 1
  8299. 1
  8300. 1
  8301. 1
  8302. 1
  8303. 1
  8304. 1
  8305. 1
  8306. 1
  8307. 1
  8308. 1
  8309. 1
  8310. 1
  8311. 1
  8312. 1
  8313. 1
  8314. 1
  8315. 1
  8316. 1
  8317. 1
  8318. 1
  8319. 1
  8320. 1
  8321. 1
  8322. 1
  8323. 1
  8324. 1
  8325. 1
  8326. 1
  8327. 1
  8328. 1
  8329. 1
  8330. 1
  8331. 1
  8332. 1
  8333. 1
  8334. 1
  8335. 1
  8336. 1
  8337. 1
  8338. 1
  8339. 1
  8340. 1
  8341. 1
  8342. 1
  8343. 1
  8344. 1
  8345. 1
  8346. 1
  8347. 1
  8348. 1
  8349. 1
  8350. 1
  8351. 1
  8352. 1
  8353. 1
  8354. 1
  8355. 1
  8356. 1
  8357. 1
  8358. 1
  8359. 1
  8360. 1
  8361. 1
  8362. 1
  8363. 1
  8364. 1
  8365. 1
  8366. 1
  8367. 1
  8368. 1
  8369. 1
  8370. 1
  8371. 1
  8372. 1
  8373. 1
  8374. 1
  8375. 1
  8376. 1
  8377. 1
  8378. 1
  8379. 1
  8380. 1
  8381. 1
  8382. 1
  8383. 1
  8384. 1
  8385. 1
  8386. 1
  8387. 1
  8388. 1
  8389. 1
  8390. 1
  8391. 1
  8392. 1
  8393. 1
  8394. 1
  8395. 1
  8396. 1
  8397. 1
  8398. 1
  8399. 1
  8400. 1
  8401. 1
  8402. 1
  8403. 1
  8404. 1
  8405. 1
  8406. 1
  8407. 1
  8408. 1
  8409. 1
  8410. 1
  8411. 1
  8412. 1
  8413. 1
  8414. 1
  8415. 1
  8416. 1
  8417. 1
  8418. 1
  8419. 1
  8420. 1
  8421. 1
  8422. 1
  8423. 1
  8424. 1
  8425. 1
  8426. 1
  8427. 1
  8428. 1
  8429. 1
  8430. 1
  8431. 1
  8432. 1
  8433. 1
  8434. 1
  8435. 1
  8436. 1
  8437. 1
  8438. 1
  8439. 1
  8440. 1
  8441. 1
  8442. 1
  8443. 1
  8444. 1
  8445. 1
  8446. 1
  8447. 1
  8448. 1
  8449. 1
  8450. 1
  8451. 1
  8452. 1
  8453. 1
  8454. 1
  8455. 1
  8456. 1
  8457. 1
  8458. 1
  8459. 1
  8460. 1
  8461. 1
  8462. 1
  8463. 1
  8464. 1
  8465. 1
  8466. 1
  8467. 1
  8468. 1
  8469. 1
  8470. 1
  8471. 1
  8472. 1
  8473. 1
  8474. 1
  8475. 1
  8476. 1
  8477. 1
  8478. 1
  8479. 1
  8480. 1
  8481. 1
  8482. 1
  8483. 1
  8484. 1
  8485. 1
  8486. 1
  8487. 1
  8488. 1
  8489. 1
  8490. 1
  8491. 1
  8492. 1
  8493. 1
  8494. 1
  8495. 1
  8496. 1
  8497. 1
  8498. 1
  8499. 1
  8500. 1
  8501. 1
  8502. 1
  8503. 1
  8504. 1
  8505. 1
  8506. 1
  8507. 1
  8508. 1
  8509. 1
  8510. 1
  8511. 1
  8512. 1
  8513. 1
  8514. 1
  8515. 1
  8516. 1
  8517. 1
  8518. 1
  8519. 1
  8520. 1
  8521. 1
  8522. 1
  8523. 1
  8524. 1
  8525. 1
  8526. 1
  8527. 1
  8528. 1
  8529. 1
  8530. 1
  8531. 1
  8532. 1
  8533. 1
  8534. 1
  8535. 1
  8536. 1
  8537. 1
  8538. 1
  8539. 1
  8540. 1
  8541. 1
  8542. 1
  8543. 1
  8544. 1
  8545. 1
  8546. 1
  8547. 1
  8548. 1
  8549. 1
  8550. 1
  8551. 1
  8552. 1
  8553. 1
  8554. 1
  8555. 1
  8556. 1
  8557. 1
  8558. 1
  8559. 1
  8560. 1
  8561. 1
  8562. 1
  8563. 1
  8564. 1
  8565. 1
  8566. 1
  8567. 1
  8568. 1
  8569. 1
  8570. 1
  8571. 1
  8572. 1
  8573. 1
  8574. 1
  8575. 1
  8576. 1
  8577. 1
  8578. 1
  8579. 1
  8580. 1
  8581. 1
  8582. 1
  8583. 1
  8584. 1
  8585. 1
  8586. 1
  8587. 1
  8588. 1
  8589. 1
  8590. 1
  8591. 1
  8592. 1
  8593. 1
  8594. 1
  8595. 1
  8596. 1
  8597. 1
  8598. 1
  8599. 1
  8600. 1
  8601. 1
  8602. 1
  8603. 1
  8604. 1
  8605. 1
  8606. 1
  8607. 1
  8608. 1
  8609. 1
  8610. 1
  8611. 1
  8612. 1
  8613. 1
  8614. 1
  8615. 1
  8616. 1
  8617. 1
  8618. 1
  8619. 1
  8620. 1
  8621. 1
  8622. 1
  8623. 1
  8624. 1
  8625. 1
  8626. 1
  8627. 1
  8628. 1
  8629. 1
  8630. 1
  8631. 1
  8632. 1
  8633. 1
  8634. 1
  8635. 1
  8636. 1
  8637. 1
  8638. 1
  8639. 1
  8640. 1
  8641. 1
  8642. 1
  8643. 1
  8644. 1
  8645. 1
  8646. 1
  8647. 1
  8648. 1
  8649. 1
  8650. 1
  8651. 1
  8652. 1
  8653. 1
  8654. 1
  8655. 1
  8656. 1
  8657. 1
  8658. 1
  8659. 1
  8660. 1
  8661. 1
  8662. 1
  8663. 1
  8664. 1
  8665. 1
  8666. 1
  8667. 1
  8668. 1
  8669. 1
  8670. 1
  8671. 1
  8672. 1
  8673. 1
  8674. 1
  8675. 1
  8676. 1
  8677. 1
  8678. 1
  8679. 1
  8680. 1
  8681. 1
  8682. 1
  8683. 1
  8684. 1
  8685. 1
  8686. 1
  8687. 1
  8688. 1
  8689. 1
  8690. 1
  8691. 1
  8692. 1
  8693. 1
  8694. 1
  8695. 1
  8696. 1
  8697. 1
  8698. 1
  8699. 1
  8700. 1
  8701. 1
  8702. 1
  8703. 1
  8704. 1
  8705. 1
  8706. 1
  8707. 1
  8708. 1
  8709. 1
  8710. 1
  8711. 1
  8712. 1
  8713. 1
  8714. 1
  8715. 1
  8716. 1
  8717. 1
  8718. 1
  8719. 1
  8720. 1
  8721. 1
  8722. 1
  8723. 1
  8724. 1
  8725. 1
  8726. 1
  8727. 1
  8728. 1
  8729. 1
  8730. 1
  8731. 1
  8732. 1
  8733. 1
  8734. 1
  8735. 1
  8736. 1
  8737. 1
  8738. 1
  8739. 1
  8740. 1
  8741. 1
  8742. 1
  8743. 1
  8744. 1
  8745. 1
  8746. 1
  8747. 1
  8748. 1
  8749. 1
  8750. 1
  8751. 1
  8752. 1
  8753. 1
  8754. 1
  8755. 1
  8756. 1
  8757. 1
  8758. 1
  8759. 1
  8760. 1
  8761. 1
  8762. 1
  8763. 1
  8764. 1
  8765. 1
  8766. 1
  8767. 1
  8768. 1
  8769. 1
  8770. 1
  8771. 1
  8772. 1
  8773. 1
  8774. 1
  8775. 1
  8776. 1
  8777. 1
  8778. 1
  8779. 1
  8780. 1
  8781. 1
  8782. 1
  8783. 1
  8784. 1
  8785. 1
  8786. 1
  8787. 1
  8788. 1
  8789. 1
  8790. 1
  8791. 1
  8792. 1
  8793. 1
  8794. 1
  8795. 1
  8796. 1
  8797. 1
  8798. 1
  8799. 1
  8800. 1
  8801. 1
  8802. 1
  8803. 1
  8804. 1
  8805. 1
  8806. 1
  8807. 1
  8808. 1
  8809. 1
  8810. 1
  8811. 1
  8812. 1
  8813. 1
  8814. 1
  8815. 1
  8816. 1
  8817. 1
  8818. 1
  8819. 1
  8820. 1
  8821. 1
  8822. 1
  8823. 1
  8824. 1
  8825. 1
  8826. 1
  8827. 1
  8828. 1
  8829. 1
  8830. 1
  8831. 1
  8832. 1
  8833. 1
  8834. 1
  8835. 1
  8836. 1
  8837. 1
  8838. 1
  8839. 1
  8840. 1
  8841. 1
  8842. 1
  8843. 1
  8844. 1
  8845.  @thomasherrin6798  That sounds like the perfect response that captures the problems and the changes. Yes, EU was very dominated by Germany & France before 2022. But they have been basically on the otherside of most of the rest of the EU. If just simplification sake, Germany and France each have 15% of the power of the EU for a total of 30%. They will need over 20% to get majority of the total EU power in their direction (20%pts out of 70%pts thus 29% of remaining power). Usually that 30% is enough to get a few others on their side to get the EU to do what they want. But almost everyone else is in disagreement with Germany and France and I think that's causing both to lose power within the EU where it once was 15%, it's now 10% each. And it's not just on Russia, much of the rest is also worried about China. >, it is with little suprise that France cannot see the danger in a petulant and hostile China towards Tawain and how that might be disastrous for Europe at present because as with its dependency on Russian Energy and it's subsequent scramble to an alternative, Europe is also heavily reliant on Chinese and Taiwanese exports Yes, even if they wanted to be neutral, a military conflict there would disrupt not just supply chains from these countries but critical components. And the issue goes well beyond just exports reliance on China and Taiwan. It would also disrupt supply chains from other countries. And that's not the whole of it --- if China gets or attempts to get Taiwan, that means they are danger for far more especially when you consider they are allied with Europe's biggest near concern, Russia. The US leaks showed there was communication between China and Russia planning possible sending of árms. They are just trying to figure out how to do so without China getting caught which would lead to sanctions on them. Does France and Germany think that China will just stop after it gets Taiwan? Even if France and Germany don't support sending troops to defend Taiwan, you don't publicly say it (want to keep China guessing) and you most certainly don't say you won't be involved in anyway becuase it's none of the EU's business. All why they want others to help join at least economically against Russia.
    1
  8846. 1
  8847. 1
  8848. 1
  8849. 1
  8850. 1
  8851. 1
  8852. 1
  8853. 1
  8854. 1
  8855. 1
  8856. 1
  8857. 1
  8858. 1
  8859. 1
  8860. 1
  8861. 1
  8862. 1
  8863. 1
  8864. 1
  8865. 1
  8866. 1
  8867. 1
  8868. 1
  8869. 1
  8870. 1
  8871. 1
  8872. 1
  8873. 1
  8874. 1
  8875. 1
  8876. 1
  8877. 1
  8878. 1
  8879. 1
  8880. 1
  8881. 1
  8882. 1
  8883. 1
  8884. 1
  8885. 1
  8886. 1
  8887. 1
  8888. 1
  8889. 1
  8890. 1
  8891. 1
  8892. 1