Comments by "Auntie M" (@auntiem873) on "NewsNation" channel.

  1. 55
  2. 15
  3. 10
  4.  @barbarajones9385  - I was explain how he could get, how any man could get full custody of their child. Then I put in my 2 cents. The problem is a person can be convicted of statutory rape if the boyfriend is 18 and the girl is 16. What it means is it was consensual sex. The age between the two is the problem. In this case she was 16 and he was 33. That’s a big difference! Then there is the she was in a bar with fake ID. Did he have reasonable suspicion that she was over 21? I say no. Cause the Woman said in an interview she looked young. He never asked her for her ID. At 33 you can tell the difference between an 18 year old and a 21 year old. If she lied about being 21 what else might she be lying about? There are no interviews with the father so, we really don’t know this for sure. My Biggest concern is the hospital visit 7 years ago that was confirmed by a doctor that the then 7 year old girl had been sexual assaulted and when reported, nothing happened. The case is still open and active but no one has investigated. And with that case still open, the judge Awarded him full custody. No supervision. The girl has been removed from his custody and is at a 3rd party, for now. It only happened because the mother went to the news, to see if they could get answers because no one would help her get them. Her lawyer now is working Pro bono because he says the judge did not act right. Meaning it may have been a bribe, It may be he is connected politically and can influence the judge that way. Or The judge just relied on a mutual friends interpretation of the guys morals to base his decision on instead of facts. Whatever the case, the news brought it out into the light and the Judge is scared.
    7
  5. 6
  6. 4
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9.  @hillsane9262  - she wasn’t caught drinking under age so there is no charge. Therefore there is no statute of limitations. Also being drunk (she does say they both were at the time in another interview) she said being drunk she could not have given consent. He being 33 at the time should have known that. Doesn’t matter the age, if the person you want to have sex with us drunk they cannot give consent. It’s up to a court to determine how drunk is too drunk for sex. She asked for a ride home, he didn’t mean her home but his and she was too drunk to understand that. I would say is too drunk to give consent. I’m not defending him. He is wrong. I just explained how the courts could give custody to the father. It’s not a crime to be a male and have full custody of your child. In this case it should be because he got around the system and used some kind of influence to control the cops so he never got charged, control the judge so he would get full custody with no proof of neglect from the mother. And as if 5 years ago, it doesn’t matter when the rape happened the victim has almost 30 years to file charges now. Just because it can take people longer than 3 to 5 years to get their lives back. I’m hoping this women uses that law to prosecute him. I’m also hoping her daughter charges him with incest for the at least 2 adults the mother has proof of. I’m hoping that the judge gets kicked off the bench and loses all their benefits. All because the judge did no investigation on either parent to see who would be the better parent for the child to live with.
    3
  10. 3
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1