Comments by "Auntie M" (@auntiem873) on "USA TODAY"
channel.
-
3
-
People look at this as a win but it’s not.
Row vs Wade also made it so women had a say over their bodies.
They did not need their Husband, Fathers, eldest son, priest’s permission or a court order to seek medical help for a hysterectomy. Breast removal, even birth control.
So, if Women can’t have control over some basic care. Neither should men.
No more men should be allowed to have vasectomies, wear condoms, have the prostate removed without their wife’s, eldest daughter, Mothers priest permission. They too will need a court order for their basic care.
Read up on Debbie Reynolds case. Yes the Actress.
Having a miscarriage but her body did not expel the baby, she wasn’t married, no eldest male at the time, no Father and the courts as well as her priest said it was gods will, the baby could still be born:
Well it had died, it was decomposing inside her body and the poison it created was killing her. But the hospital and her doctors didn’t want to go to jail.
Her case did not fall under the life of the mother because her baby was dead so she wasn’t a mother.
So she had to wait.
So keep in mind ectopic pregnancy falls under this.
The baby will not grow for long outside the womb. No baby has ever survive being born outside the womb but it is very painful to the women.
Since the baby is not inside the women, she is not a mother. But you can’t remover the baby because it is still a baby.
So an abortion ban is not a win but it is a restriction on women. So, it should be also a restriction on men.
1
-
1