Youtube comments of Auntie M (@auntiem873).
-
17000
-
8300
-
8100
-
8100
-
3900
-
2500
-
1500
-
1200
-
1100
-
817
-
718
-
688
-
669
-
654
-
619
-
546
-
503
-
434
-
432
-
390
-
387
-
372
-
361
-
359
-
357
-
348
-
330
-
315
-
284
-
279
-
261
-
259
-
238
-
231
-
229
-
226
-
212
-
202
-
201
-
195
-
192
-
187
-
181
-
174
-
159
-
156
-
156
-
155
-
153
-
151
-
150
-
146
-
138
-
137
-
130
-
126
-
126
-
123
-
123
-
121
-
119
-
115
-
115
-
111
-
110
-
108
-
105
-
103
-
102
-
101
-
100
-
100
-
99
-
97
-
97
-
97
-
94
-
91
-
90
-
89
-
88
-
88
-
88
-
85
-
85
-
84
-
82
-
79
-
78
-
76
-
75
-
75
-
74
-
73
-
73
-
72
-
71
-
71
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
69
-
69
-
69
-
68
-
68
-
67
-
66
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
62
-
61
-
61
-
60
-
59
-
59
-
59
-
57
-
56
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
53
-
52
-
51
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
It’s all fine and dandy until the migrants stay in your city.
Mexico didn’t want them but encouraged them by giving them food and water, clothing.
Then once they couldn’t cross, things became different.
Same thing happened with Germany.
They stopped people from coming ashore, they discouraged people from fleeing their land, encouraged them to stay and fight for their land.
They were criticized.
So, Germany opened their boarders, gave the people food and shelter, clothing. Then put them on trains to go on with their journey to other parts - France, England.
Now all the European countries are upset.
I’m sorry but, close the boarders. Let it be known that they are not open. Turn around and go home.
Or at the very least, set up a new life in the towns they made it to.
Boast their economy with the increase of work force.
The US economy sucks, many US citizens are looking for work.
We can’t absorb everyone right now.
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
I was on a flight, boarded last evening though I was in the second group.
Found someone had put their bags in my seat and under the seat in front of me, where my feet go.
The bags in my seat were 4 overnight size bags stuffed into the seat. They did not need a belt to hold them in.
The flight attendant asked whose bags they were, no one said anything. She took them.
Then I just rested my feet on the bag in front of me, they had lots of foot prints on the bags before take off, turned out that bag belongs to my seat mate, who took it (before take off) and put in his space. He just wanted to be able to stretch out.
He saw the bags in the seat and didn’t think anyone would be sitting there. But when I showed up, he was embarrassed. Got over it when he saw what I was doing and took his bag back.
No space in the over head meant I had to hold my small bag, once the guy removed his bag I put mine in the space and bam! Just like that there was more room for everyone to sit comfortably.
At the end of the flight a women started screaming cause her bags were not where she left them (my seat). She was from the back of the plane. One of the people who jump up before the plane gets to the gate.
Turns out since no one claimed the bag at the announcement, they left the bags back at the old airport.
This family had no clothes now and somehow, it was the airlines fault.
The best part, they had small kids with them so they were one of the first people to board. They had plenty of room to store their bags in their seat area.
9
-
9
-
My Mom told me that she would never wish to be a royal when I said it must be so nice to be royal and have servants.
Mom told me that being a royal your life is not your own. You have to do what the people around you tell you to do. They will tell you when to get up, who you can and can not talk to, what to eat, how to eat, what to wear, where to go 24/7.
There job is to make you look good but also what is best for others, but not you.
You cannot live without them.
My Mom was alive during WWII, she remembers how The Queen struggled, her kids, when Charles was ordered to find a wife. She felt sorry for whomever that was going to be because there would be love in that Marriage. It would be a Marriage to produce the heir and spare that’s it.
I’m sorry Megan’s family did not warn her. I’m sorry no one warned her what she was getting into.
To be fair, Harry should not have this much attention on his life or Family. They have every right to want to be free of the royals. To make their way in the world. That also means not accepting Money for living expenses that comes from just being a royal and not from their investments or money earned. Until that happens, the Royals have every right to have a say in what they do as well as the people of England.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
During Drivers Ed way back in the 1980’s , when I took it in High School, the Teacher said that the Driver is the one behind the wheel that drives the car, Hence the name Driver. This person is 100% responsible for the actions or control of the car. That’s all I needed to understand that I am not traveling but Driving the car.
The Washington State booklet says in the first paragraph that this book is not a law book but an instructional booklet and cannot be used as a defense in court. It did not say traffic court it said court.
I took that to mean that if I hurt someone while driving I may find myself in court that is not traffic court so, I should be more responsible behind the wheel. No one had to tell me that. Came up with it on my own.
In college I used as a reference a book that was old, 3rd edition and I got a lower grade because the instructor just knew there was an new addition available (before the Internet). The information was the same but it was still an old edition. Same with using old dictionary’s.
The people on the Internet I have seen all claim to be college graduates and so they should know that using such an old book when newer ones have redefined or updated their definitions, their arguments are wrong.
I was also told that a cops doesn’t have to tell you anything and they have 72 hours to notify you of any charges if they arrest you. So asking and
Not getting an answer on “why did you pull me over? “ is within the cops right.
The drivers handbook, also talks about who can ask for your license police, bartenders, doctors, then the next paragraph says you must surrender your license upon request. I didn’t need the paragraph to go into great detail since paragraphs before this one has already explained it. When I signed for my license, it again had a sentence that said that. The rules for having that license, says by signing this card I agree to surrender it upon request.
I look to the police for stopping reckless drivers as protecting
My life and property. So the “Where’s the victim” I point to everyone around saying anyone here could have been the victim but the police did their job by stopping you from damaging a life or property. They are being proactive instead of waiting till after the fact. When people argue with me I say - so you would rather be in an accident with that reckless driver then have them stopped before your new to you car gets damaged?
When they say No - I say that’s why they stopped you. You were that reckless driver and they protected me from you.
I am always told that I do not understand the situation. Which I reply I do, it’s you who don’t like my answer because I am not agree with your stupidity.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
When I was in the Army, they give classes to
The soldiers about this stuff. They say over and over to read the contract that way you o ow what they can and cannot do. The can charge more without telling you so read it.
Well, all dealerships around Military bases are bad, shady bad. I have not found one that is 75% honest.
I went in to buy my first car. I came in with the paper they advertised in. I asked to see 1 vehicle. It had been sold, I then went down the list of my 2nd choice, 3rd, 4th and so on, all had been sold. There were around 50-70 cars sold on that page, small print as well as photos. Not 1 was there, all been sold. The salesman was Will to show Me something else, way out of my price range.
I showed the guy the paper and asked when all these cars were sold? He said some last week, others last month, or months ago.
I then informed him that, that was illegal. His dealership had a responsibility to get rid of the cars sold as soon as possible. I can understand any thing sold this week but not 2 weeks ago. It’s called switch and baiting, deceptive advertising. He then took me the area where the cars I could afford were at.
My then Boyfriend (now Husband) had no poker face and got so excited. I did manage to find a car I wanted. Got a price and we were working out the payment plan. Another salesman butted in and tried to do a mark up, saying it was to pay for his involvement in the deal. I got up and started to leave when I was stopped by 3 other salesmen. They wanted to know where I was going. I told them that I don’t know this salesmen, he was not the one I was working with and he doesn’t deserve any part of the deal I was working out with the first guy.
I got an apology, the original deal back on the table.
I was handed the sales contract that
Just had my name on it and the car info, nothing else was filled in.
When I asked about it, I was told the dealership was closing and they didn’t have time to finish it, I could comeback later to get the filled out one, all I had to do was sign this form and I could drive the car off the lot.
I got up again and said I was not signing a blank form. The dealership didn’t close until 8pm it was 7 and if they wanted to go home early that was on them. I’ll keep looking, the other dealerships are still open. Next think I knew my complete form with the sales price, payment plan I wanted was on the desk. They printed it out in the time I took to tell them I was leaving, going to the other dealerships.
I got a 1 year warranty on my 3 year old used car. Tune up, oil change, low interest rate, payment of $165, a month. Drove off the lot with it.
Next day, all the cars that I pointed out during the visit were no longer in the paper.
Never go car shopping and let them talk you into doing them a favor for giving you a deal.
After that I ran to JAG to ask them about the interest rate 8 or 10%. I was still within my window to return the car, if it was too high, I was going to. JAG said I had one of the best rates they had ever seen. Average interest on a car was 10-12%.
They told me how they were in a legal battle with the same dealership that was charging a private (E-2) 23%
Interest rate off a 3 year old used car with many more miles then what I had on mine. His payments were $400 a month. His pay was $800 a month. He fell for the sign a blank document, we will take care of you.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
I understand his hurt.
I had the opposite- my father died in a house fire. The EMTs worked on him for an hour on our front lawn.
The news used it in one of their commercials.
Every night we would see our home burn and our father dying.
It hurts.
The military has copies if not the real SD cards.
The families have something they think was wiped.
They think it’s to cover something up when in reality, it’s probably to protect the families from seeing their loved one die.
It’s not going to bring piece of mind. It’s just going to make you angry, sad, fixated.
Yes, sometimes, we need to be protected from ourselves.
Your not the first ones to go through this, the military has learned from past mistakes.
In the end. Wither you were lied to or not, knowing everything will not change a thing.
There are times that even with video, there are still so many unknowns, unanswered questions that no one knows the answers too and the military has told you all they know.
Again, it still doesn’t change the outcome.
4
-
4
-
@princekareem - agreed and they thought so too. Which is why he was told no, go away.
He and his buddies were bar hopping. He sent his mother photos of all the places they had gone.
It’s hard for a bar to know that one drink is going to put someone over the limit in those cases.
Also, as a group it is hard to tell if someone is drunk or just having fun.
So the bar served him at least one drink, not sure about his buddies, since one guy had to stop before leaving the bar to pay the tab.
It just happened that one guy was his buddy. Who was also drinking and didn’t keep his wits about him, didn’t remember to keep his drunk friend in sight till it was too late.
This had to have taken a bit of time cause by the time he got out, he couldn’t see his 6’5” size friend anywhere. Which is really a neat trick cause he would have towered over everyone
Or if paying the bill didn’t take that long, his friend gets out of the bar, can’t see him anywhere and assumes he got a cab back to their hotel.
Which is what happened here.
That’s why it took 12 hours to realize he never made it back to the hotel.
Knocking on a drunk persons room, no answer, you assume they are passed out so you go to your room and pass out.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
As far as he knew she was a part of this threat against his family.
And it was a threat.
All he knows is someone came to his door asking for a package.
He was told on the phone to get money and package it up.
In his mind and anyone else’s goes through this, this woman was part of the robbers team.
The threat came from the phone call, pay this amount or your relative dies.
Then someone comes to your door wanted the package.
You’re going to want to keep them there till the cops arrive.
Your going to want to demand who they are, identify themselves, where is your loved one and if you don’t get answers, that person tried to leave, even fights you, yeah, your probably going to shoot them to send a message back to the kidnappers and to anyone else, don’t mess will him or his.
The only tragedy here is the women was innocent.
The man didn’t know that. He acted on the know the had.
If it wasn’t for the phone call, the cops wouldn’t have put the pieces together.
The man is not guilty due to extenuating circumstances.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@BreakinUpBuds - sorry the response has taken too long. I was not notified you had responded to me.
Anyway.
Look at it this way.
Your breaks go out and your car winds up jumping the curb and landing in someone’s living room.
No one is hurt.
You leave the car to make a phone call, insurance, call a tow truck.
Call the police.
You went to the sidewalk, stayed there making all your calls.
It takes 30 minutes to make the calls.
You go back to the house, your car.
Only you find out the home owner has chained the car to the fireplace, a stair bannister.
Your reasoning is, the car is the home owners now and they can do what they want????
They do not give you time to make arrangements to get the car removed.
The car should have just been backed out, left the home?
Sorry but in many places, the law says you cannot remove the vehicle till police show up or you have been given permission to remove the car if it does not cause more damage.
In this case, the guy hit the tree head on, there is a good chance he cracked his radiator, engine block and maybe the frame.
It is not safe to move the vehicle if it can move at all.
The owner made arrangements to have the car picked up only to find that it can’t because the Tow company finds the car chained to the tree.
There are a lot of areas where a tow truck cannot come out till the next day.
That’s doesn’t mean he has to stay with the car.
It would have been nice if he left a note on the home owners door (if it was late at night when it happened), but he doesn’t have to.
He left a note on the car itself saying he will take care of it.
He did.
The home owner wants people to be more responsible and not speed there.
Good luck with that, he cannot control the public.
The home owner cannot keep something that is not his even if it is on his property. By law.
Now if the car was there for 30 days after the accident that’s another story.
After 30 days it can be considered abandoned.
Then the home owner can lay claim to the vehicle but he still has to file the paperwork first.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The same scam is being done here in Virginia but with appliances.
I was new to the area, I needed an over repairman, for my oven, and I used Google to find one in my area.
After looking at 6 near my home, I called.
A women with a middle eastern accent answered and I scheduled the appointment.
There is a $65.00 service fee on top of repairs.
I then canceled the appointment and went to the next one. Same lady answered that phone as well and the same for the 3rd number.
I tell my husband who says that’s how it is now days. Multiple companies use one service for scheduling like doctors offices do.
So I called again and went with the 4th name on the list.
A different woman answered but still had a faint accent.
I scheduled and told about the $65.00 service fee.
I book it. Now I am also paying by AmEx.. they accepted this but once the tech arrives, he barely speaks English, came into the house without a bag of tools, turns the oven on and said I needed to get a new stove.
That will be $65.00.
I know it’s the thermostat, it just needs a new one.
I have no choice but to pay.
I went to the last name in the list and called them and got the same answering service, booked a new appointment.
The tech arrives with a flashlight and a screwdriver.
Went to the oven turned it on. Tells me before even waiting for the oven to get up-to temperature that I needed a new oven, that will be $65.00.
Again I pay.
All these techs came into the house and were out within 10 minutes.
I have now been in the house 4 months and I was getting to know people.
I got a referral to a family owned company.
Called and made an appointment, the receptionist only worked for that company in their office.
I could hear the technician coming in and out for appointments.
I scheduled another appointment and told about the $65.00 fee but that it would be included in to any repairs done.
I book.
The tech comes with a bag of tools,
Moves my stove away from the wall and opens the back.
Hooks up to the motherboard in the oven, turns the oven on, does some stuff on the computer and after 20 mins. Says that the mother board is fried. It has also destroyed the thermostat.
To replace it all would cost more than the oven was worth.
Then goes on the explain the features that were left that the motherboard would still work on.
That way I would know what I could do with my oven/stove.
This guy acted more like a repair man than anyone who came to the house.
The man stayed for 45 mins the taking the oven apart, the putting it back together and explaining it all to me.
So now I know the others were scams.
I am also glade I paid with the AmEx and not my regular credit card.
Cause if they had the number that would have removed the money directly out of my account. They could have drained me dry in seconds.
I am only going by word of mouth now.
Not trusting anything on the internet, nothing that comes in the mail.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@jo-annerichardson34 - funny, my ancestors are from here.
They were here before this country was started.
Here’s the truth, I got it from a neighbor who use to be a border patrol officer, he’s retired after 40 years of service.
A lot of the immigrants are coming up from their country because the missionaries convinced them that if they converted to their religion that their church would help them once they found their own way into the states.
They would even coach them on what to say to apply for political asylum.
It’s one reason why our government really do not believe so many people really are political refugees.
The funny thing is, those who do get through, they make the phone calls and about half are left behind. The church that promised them so much, only took the ones they liked.
That’s the reality.
The people who come up are not really fleeing from government oppression. They are coming here to make a quick Buck and then go home.
That may have been okay a few years ago, but because of covid, we can’t afford to let people come in for a short amount of time and take jobs that our own people need.
It will be around 10 years before this country can get back on its feet.
During that time we can slowly let people in. But we cannot absorb the numbers that are coming to the boarders today. We just can’t.
Unless we put them in trains and just send them straight to Canada. Canada has the room, the food, the same systems in place that are not to their breaking point.
They even have more space than the US to develop.
Or, we can tell Mexico to stop them at their boarder, take them in and absorb them or send them home. Stop making it our problem.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@danielgloverpiano7693 - I saw rocks being thrown, the people chasing him were at least 50pound heavier then him and taller.
There is no law that says he can’t carry a gun before 18. The laws are clear, he can’t buy one before that.
As such many kids have guns and go hunting all the time.
The gun in question was from his Uncle.
Meaning his uncle brought it to the location from K.R. Home and given to him for the purpose of protecting his business that had be looted and trashed previously.
They wanted to make sure, it didn’t happen again which, is their right.
It is perfectly legal to shoot a looter.
The crowd saw them, came to them and tried to take their weapons. They did not do it because they saw a child or teen with a gun and out of his safety.
They wanted them and thought they should have them so they rushed the group.
They got what they deserved.
I’m sorry the people got shot. I’m sorry someone died.
But it was through their stupidity.
They could have just kept walking, they could have left the group alone.
They didn’t.
The group and K.R. Didn’t provoke the protestors, it was the other way around and it is all on video, news footage, people’s cell phones. There is plenty of proof, that the crowd chased them and no shots where fired. The protestors throwing things at them.
Sticks and stones do hurt and can kill.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
This is so sad.
The city spent millions cleaning up that area in the 80’s.
Just to make it a prime tourist attraction.
Police went in a got the hookers out of the area (pushed them down the street, to pioneer square, the shop owners chased them away from there),
The closed the X-rated theaters. Got rid of flip houses and turned them into apartments or offices.
Made it a safe place for everyone to go and enjoy, not just tourists.
All that work, gone.
Seattle was dying till they did that.
Down town is going to die if the city doesn’t do something to get rid of addicts and mentally unstable people.
It will require people’s rights to be violated. Loose a few to help the future.
In the 80’s it was hookers and porn, no one cared about that.
Today it’s addicts who for some reason people care about but not enough to help them get clean.
The money to help these people needs to stop coming in.
Once people stop getting paid to care about them, the police can come in and clear them out. Some will make it and get clean others will not.
But they aren’t getting the help now either.
How about spending the money on work houses?
Gather the people up, get them sober, teach them a job and they work in the factories until they realize they can do better elsewhere.
They will have a roof over their head, 2 or 3 meals a day as long as they work.
If not they can get out and do what they want and risk jail next time.
The city makes good to sell cheaply and the consumers get necessities cheaper.
Bolts of fabric can be produced cheaper, clothes can be cheaper.
Lawnmowers can be made of good quality but produced cheaper so they can be sold cheaper.
You work force isn’t slave labor but they don’t get paid much either.
Same as if they were in prison.
What they are getting is a place over their head, a skill, food, medical, dental. They just have to work for it and they can leave at any time. It’s just if they get caught passed out from drugs in the street, they will not be given a chance to get clean in a workhouse but in prison instead.
This should eliminate over crowded prisons from non violent crimes such as drug possession or prostitution, shoplifting.
Serve their time in the work house and they are free.
It’s harsh, it is what worked in the past though. In time they will shut down as the need for them goes away.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Think about what he has seen in his lifetime, as a man of color, a witness of history.
He saw the industry revolution, one room school houses, segregation, desegregation, 2 world wars and a bunch of minor ones, flying around the world and to space, the moon and back again, television, color T.V., phones in every home to phones in almost everyone’s pockets, microwave ovens, electricity in homes, indoor plumbing for everyone, seeing horses replaced by cars, the Internet, prohibition and its recall, mob wars, so much more.
All that knowledge, stories gone.
I hope he went out of this world better than when he came in.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I have had all the Covid symptoms for years. Lost of taste and smell for a month, persistent cough 2+weeks at a time, vertigo so bad I throw up.
I’m told it’s an allergy. I get allergy medicine till it turns into bronchitis then I get the antibiotics and it goes away for 4 months and starts all over again. Except then I’m told to take more allergy medicine. I now self diagnose myself cause the doctors would not give many anything but a bill for allergy.
I was sick for 18 days, small decor loss of smell/taste and I was told to take fluids. This was 10 days before the country locked down. At the end of the fever (8 days) I got so dizzy I couldn’t open my eyes or I would get sick.
Went in and got tested for the flu (Covid was never mentioned and I didn’t know about it, it was not mainstream). Not the flu so I got a stronger dose of Sudafed along with some meclizine and sent home. 3 days later I have a cough so bad I cough for an hour straight, can barely get a breath in before I coughing attack.
I know it was an hour cause it started at the start of my show and ended at the end of it. I just wanted to die or stop anything.
I held my breath for as long as I could before the next round of coughing. Like fighting pain with pain. It worked.
And after all that 18 days. I was better. The fog lifted.
I have not been sick for a year.
Keep in mind every 4 months I would have a coughing fit, dizzy loss of smell and taste something for the last 5/6 years with no help from the doctors other than it’s allergies take allergy meds.
Now everyone who has Covid is getting attention and complaining about how bad their memory is , how it sucks with not being able to taste food.
I have no sympathy.
I had to learn to live with it, made fun of, told I’m not a spring chicken any more just learn to live with a unique getting older symptom.
I think Covid has been around for a lot longer then people think, masked as an allergy and it was never contagious, till now.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Well it turns out the documents were not for his library. They were documents on nuclear weapons and power stations.
The reason why more people died in 2021 and not 2020 is because they were in lock down and it slowed the speed of covid.
As predicted once everyone started going out and about it spread.
As for free press, he is the one that kicked out the press so only those he liked and could manipulate had access to the White House press room. He controlled the media. Anyone who didn’t agree with him was banned.
Doesn’t sound like freedom of the press to me.
As for the other things, it’s all in the timing. The president has
No power without congress’s permission.
I do not like that Americans were left when the US pulled out.
However that plan was made under Trumps term and Biden trusted his Generals to have a good plan. They didn’t cause it was Trumps plan. Even the Generals didn’t come up with it and they tried to make it work.
Leaving the equipment behind us something the U.S. does. They disable or destroy the equipment and leave it cause it cost to much money to bring it home.
The US has been doing this since the Korean War.
As for Gas prices, Biden has no control over them. They are controlled by oil companies like OPEC. They have since the 1970’s.
Biden asked congress to drop the federal tax on fuel to give people a break on the price and congress said no.
Again, he has no power without congress.
The pipeline that everyone is upset that got shut down, isn’t being shut down, it’s just going to be going around areas instead of a straight shot to refineries.
It has not pumped any oil through it yet. So how can shutting it down raise the price of fuel for all the companies. It’s only one company that is going to be using it.
It will be up and running in a few more years, it just will not be going through Indian land.
The refinery’s have the oil, they just don’t have the manpower. Not just that but there are not enough truck drivers to take the refines
Fuel away.
That is what is driving up the price.
Not Biden.
Everyone wants the simple answer, everyone wants someone to blame.
Well it’s not simple and we have no one but ourselves to blame.
You get nothing for free but Trump sure is trying to convince everyone they do.
It started with subsidized checks to get us through covid and then we could get back to work. Only companies shut down and went away because they didn’t have the work force. They quit!
Why not, they were getting paid for doing nothing.
Now we are seeing the price of that. Biden just inherited this mess.
His presidency will be defined on how he handles it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Her mugshot just shows that she was arrested and a few hours later released. It says nothing about a conviction.
After all someone may have seen her in her own car or her boyfriend’s car.
They call the cops and she gets arrested. Only for the charges dropped once the DA finds out no one is pressing charges.
So, you can’t judge on that photo alone.
Although, her actions now, say she was probably guilty of robbing cars. Her actions are more criminal than law abiding.
All it will take is for someone to file a lawsuit against the township for loansharking.
Her fines are excessive and the city has a law on the books on how much the fines are.
Anything over that amount is excessive and it is against the law.
Banks and landlords can’t do it. The federal government can’t do it.
She can’t do it.
As a result of the lawsuit, all, not some but all the money, should be returned.
Also, yes, the FBI does need to be informed of this woman’s behavior.
Her excessive spending, hiring and lockout of elected officials is also criminal.
If they come in though, they will take over the town and run it themselves until a new election can happen. That may take years because they also come in and suspend all elections during their investigation.
The Federal government comes in and takes the town over.
The good news is, they will get rid of a lot of corruption, get the money back or the city account back in order. They will confiscate items and sell them if they have to.
This may include the Mayors home and belongings.
The bad news is some good people will get caught up in this and lose everything and the people may elect another douchebag. Then the feds will have to come back and do it all again.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I find it sad how no one remembers his first wife’s divorce.
A lot of shady things came out.
Most of which were his business practices. Put things in other peoples name so the government can’t touch you. You don’t have to pay taxes cause it’s not in your name.
His wife in the other hand whom he put in her name did pay the taxes.
And like adverse possession, when Trump asked for his companies back the courts ruled No, he gave them to her, he walked away from them at that moment and she had been paying the taxes for years, they were here to keep.
Trump couldn’t get a loan for years.
Then there was the Taj Mahal in Atlantic City where he finally was able to get a bank loan at a stupidly high rate, he built it.
He also thought he could skim from the profits to do other projects. Found out he couldn’t so he walked away.
The Bank foreclosed and all those people were out of work.
The bank came to foreclose on Trump tower but couldn’t cause it was no longer in the banks name, he managed to get another loan for it and both banks had to fight each other to get control. In the end, the 2nd bank paid off the first bank (the remaining loan) and ate it.
This was all on the news!
Time made people forget I guess.
Then there is Colbert,
He said long before Covid that he was not going to do some things with Trump, around the time he kicked the press out of the White House.
It was feeding into Trumps ego.
He was just going to report on major things cause insane people were buying into it and the sane people where being ignored.
He believed the sane people were not being heard and that he hoped during the next election they would be.
So he reports like that about any Trump thing. Not funny, not a joke. It’s just to get out to the masses what’s going on with him.
So he’s not a lefty losing it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
My child kept going to the ER and kicked out of day care every other day, fever up to 105. His doctor (a military pediatric Dr.) said it was normal, I wanted to
Go to ENT. It started at age 3 Months.
The Doctor kept giving my son antibiotics, we were on round 4 of the 4 types he could take at such a young age. I had to have a referral
To go to ENT at this time and he would not give me one. He kept saying as a first time
Mom it was me
Not the baby.
My child stopped babbling or paying attention when I was talking to him unless I was face to face.
The Doctor went on vacation or something but I got to see another one and that doctor was confused as to what treatment to do since we had done everything 3/4 times. He gave
Me The referral.
I go and the doctor is in the room 30 seconds, looks at the baby’s ears and leaves, 30 minutes later he comes back and tells me I’m lucky I am not going to jail for child endangerment or neglect.
My son almost lost his hearing due to a massive infection in both ears. He got ear tubes and they drained puss for 6 months. The original doctor was mad, he didn’t believe in ear tubes and took it out on me by putting in my medical records as well as my sons that I was a hypercondract.
My son started
To hear right after his surgery and started
Speaking. He was 9 months old. By a year he was speaking words. I had to work with him after work cause the medical records, I could not get a referral for speech therapy through his doctor. ENT took pity on me and I was told to ignor the normal procedures, come to them any time for anything. They understood that I was fighting for my child against someone who let their personal beliefs interfere with proper medical treatment.
In the military I was not allowed to change where I or my son went for treatment. That means I was forced to see this one doctor for my child even though there were others.
My son was over a year old before the higher up understood that this one doctor was the problem and not me, the private, Mom. It took the head of ENT, the deputy base commander, my chain of command and my sons Day Care to make the medical branch understand it was this doctor that was a danger to this one patient and not a over reactive Mom.
So fight for your child, even when told something is normal but you think it is not.
After the tubes were in my child never went back to this doctor except for routine shots. There was no need, he got better, no problems.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I drove a school bus (substitute driver),
The bus was full, elementary school, 3 students to a seat.
1 child, special needs just got transferred to the bus earlier that month. Maybe 2 weeks earlier.
Before that the mother was taking and picking up the child.
This child had a bad day in class and demanded a seat to himself.
I couldn’t do that and I explained it to him. He was in the 3rd grade.
Some kids tried to accommodate the kid with 4 to a seat but they were falling off the seat.
I could tell this had happened before and from the kids reactions it was not going to be good.
I had to put another child next to him, 2 other kids. They did volunteer and they were the same age and size as this boy.
They were getting off, they said within the first couple of stops.
All was fine until the bus started down the road and the boy tried to hit the other kids on the seat.
Started screaming in their ears.
I got to the first stop- 1 kid got off,
2nd stop, 3rd stop finally at the 4th stop the kids in the front seat got off.
The kid got the seat to themselves. That didn’t stop him.
He started to walk around the bus.
I had to stop the bus, he say Dale further back and started to hit the kids in that seat, stop the bus.
The child was still on the bus with 7 students on the bus out of the 50 I started with.
I follow the driving sheet and the kid looses it grabs a smaller girls hair, she starts screaming, I can’t stop the bus because of the location/traffic I can just watch as and older child grabs him to get him to let go of the 1st grader.
That’s when the kid starts throwing windmills. I can finally pull over and I grab the child, a bear hug while trying to see if the other kid is hurt.
The older kid said no but I think he is. I don’t see blood but the kid looked to be in pain.
I tried to help but the kid refused saying his stop is next he’ll have him Mom check him out.
Two stops left and everyone but 2 kids get off.
The last stop the kid gets off and his mother is mad at me. She wanted him dropped off earlier.
Next day at school, I was called in to the office and the VP wanted to talk to me.
I watched the child’s Mother leave the office so I knew what was going to happen.
I was told to take the child home first and then go back and drop everyone else off.
I told the VP that’s not happening as the child is the last one off the bus. It’s not right that the others would see me drive right past their homes just so this guy could go home first.
The VP tells me to make it happen. I said no.
Any changes have to be from the Bus director and not you the VP.
I tried explain how full the bus was, I tried explaining how the day before the mother wasn’t even home till maybe 5 minutes before I got there because I watched he drive past me and into her driveway with groceries.
By law I have to wait for her to pick up her child before I could leave.
So even if I make this 1 boy my first stop and then go back and start my route like normal I would have to wait on this parent.
The parent’s complaint- she wanted the child to ride the bus so she could have some extra time for herself.
She didn’t work and had all day while the child was at school to herself but that extra 45 minutes while on the bus was special for her and she liked not having to deal with the child in her car. Because I wouldn’t drop him off first I was being unreasonable.
I point out how does that give her more time to herself if I drop the child off first, that’s not 45 min. she gets to herself.
The VP didn’t have an answer.
Turns out the Mother said she wouldn’t be home until later but that the bus should wait for her, you know with all the kids on the bus.
She was told I would not be accommodating her by the bus director and is mad because now she will be taking her child to and from school herself again.
The regular driving told me I need to keep whatever I did up.
He couldn’t get the child off the bus, transferred to the small bus because of the Mother.
That’s why he took some time off, in the short time the kid was on the bus he had stressed out the regular driver.
The parent refused to let her child ride the handicapped bus, the only ones that had additional help on them.
She wanted her child to be treated like a normal kid while at the same time wanted everyone else to treat her child like a special needs kid.
The bottom line was the mother wanted more time to herself and by her child riding the regular bus she got that time.
The mother was also looking for a lawsuit.
She thought she had it with me till I told the VP that the school is lucky a parent of the other kids who have been slapped, punched and hair pulled out of their child’s head has not sued the school and or the parent for the harm this 1 child has inflicted on them.
The VP told me they know the child has violent outbursts and that I have to take that into account.
I said no I don’t.
My job is to get the kids to and from school safely not accommodate 1 child who has violent outbursts and puts everyone else in danger.
I don’t know if it was the way I said it or that I said there are 49 kids afraid on that bus because of him that the parent is now back to driving the kid.
I guess it is easier to be sued by 1 parent then 49.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ - 1) I can tell your not from the states.
2) the law says a safe distance while driving true, depending on the speed you are going.
The rule is 1 car length for every 10 MPH you are going. As for stopping there is a specific distance as well, 6 feet. Most people cannot figure that out while behind the wheel so the instructor and some driving manuals will say stop before you loose sight of the tire and the road.
It really does depend on the height of booths vehicles. As such the law stays at 6 feet.
It also says you must yield at yield signs and traffic that is already on the road you want to be on.
If you watch this video again, the truck was traveling at the proper distance maybe a little further back which is why this guy thought he could squeeze in.
He shouldn’t have. He was in the wrong.
Only insurance companies say that the driver needs to avoid an accident when possible.
The last chance doctrine which the insurance companies got passed in some states, says you have to try to avoid an accident.
Only here we can see the other vehicle trying to bully their way in, they could have avoided the accident by slowing down and pulling in behind the man once it became clear he was not giving up his spot.
The other car had broken 2 laws while the OP 1. The last chance doctrine.
Which a Judge does not have to apply if it is found that the other vehicle broke the law before the accident happened.
A good lawyer would argue this. Sadly a lot of lawyers do not want to argue the case in traffic court cause there is no money. As well as most people do not have the time or money to pursue it.
But if OP wanted to sue the other driver under this and sue for a lot of money, punitive damages, the frustration of points on their license based on what the insurance companies say, the increase of premiums (if any), the deductible for fixing his vehicle or getting the money back that the insurance paid out so far, to lawyer, bringing his premiums to what he was paying before the accident, the time off work, the frustration of having to find another way to work, the rental of a vehicle, the suffering from the teasing or yelling from coworkers, spouse, lawyers would argue this and probably win.
That’s because once the law is broken, everything that happens after that is the fault of the one who broke the law in the first place.
This is what use to happen in the past up to the 70’s and 80’s when insurance became mandatory and cases like this dropped.
But the laws are still there and the insurance companies are taking advantage of them instead of private citizens.
It’s called complaisance and the insurance company and Courts love it.
So just to recap, you do not have to let a car in just because they want in and they are coming from a side street as well as a yield sign.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@RR.LL.3B - no, with this video we don’t know about emotional abuse. With Johnny and Amber, they gave it to each other but it seems like Amber did it more and was way more vicious.
She recorded herself berating him till she got a response - him yelling at her, calling her names.
She claimed that as abuse from him.
However, from the recordings she started it, she would verbally abuse him for hours and the witnesses said sometime for days before he would snap at her.
That would be a normal response from anyone who was called worthless, old, washed up.
Which didn’t make sense to me cause
It was at his peak of popularity, she married him knowing the age difference, he had rolls coming in where her rolls came from him asking for favors.
Now if he was on the downside of all this, I might believe he was taking his frustrations out on her. Not getting parts because no one wanted him.
Yea he might insult her cause she is working and not him.
That never happened. Instead she berated him for being popular and not her.
Her recordings showed that.
That why I believe, her mental abuse of him and not his towards her.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Women do not need men to stand up and defend women.
I’m not a feminist but I know this.
Men do not need to believe women when they tell them something like this happened to them. They do, they know men. It’s other women who need to believe them. A woman’s worst enemy... another women.
As for HW and those like him, do not let this go without reporting it. Without a complaint made, to the motion picture, TV guild, the police, no one can help. If it has happened to you make the complaint! Do not let it happen to someone else. People like this get away with it not because they are rich but because no one complains about it to the proper people.
You can’t just say it happened and hope that, that someone spreads the word, you have to make a formal complaint to the guilds, HR, police. Without that official complaint there will be no investigation because, no complaint = no crime.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
If what she says is true, it is a medical emergency.
The people who died is tragic however, he doesn’t deserve jail time.
That’s like saying you suffer a stoke and kill someone , you should still go to jail cause the victims family would feel better.
If he was drunk, then no, he deserves to stay in jail.
If he fell asleep cause he was tired, nope, as an officer he knows the dangers of being tired and falling asleep at your post.
You get punished.
He should be use to 24 hour duty so, I don’t think he was tired and just fell asleep.
He would have known enough to pull over.
It does sound like the whole family got sick. As such, I believe he was sick when he passed out.
It’s a tragedy, an accident but, not a crime.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
People look at this as a win but it’s not.
Row vs Wade also made it so women had a say over their bodies.
They did not need their Husband, Fathers, eldest son, priest’s permission or a court order to seek medical help for a hysterectomy. Breast removal, even birth control.
So, if Women can’t have control over some basic care. Neither should men.
No more men should be allowed to have vasectomies, wear condoms, have the prostate removed without their wife’s, eldest daughter, Mothers priest permission. They too will need a court order for their basic care.
Read up on Debbie Reynolds case. Yes the Actress.
Having a miscarriage but her body did not expel the baby, she wasn’t married, no eldest male at the time, no Father and the courts as well as her priest said it was gods will, the baby could still be born:
Well it had died, it was decomposing inside her body and the poison it created was killing her. But the hospital and her doctors didn’t want to go to jail.
Her case did not fall under the life of the mother because her baby was dead so she wasn’t a mother.
So she had to wait.
So keep in mind ectopic pregnancy falls under this.
The baby will not grow for long outside the womb. No baby has ever survive being born outside the womb but it is very painful to the women.
Since the baby is not inside the women, she is not a mother. But you can’t remover the baby because it is still a baby.
So an abortion ban is not a win but it is a restriction on women. So, it should be also a restriction on men.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ncisfan1002 - if the child had fallen, yes, then the cops could bust the door down.
That is imminent danger.
Not before.
Under your line of thinking;
A cop sees a guy on a bike, stop him before he runs the red light to give him a ticket.
Or
Arrest a man before he robs a store because he has dark clothes, a red handkerchief that could be used as a mask.
The child was safe in the high chair.
It was not going to crawl away and get hurt trying to pull themselves up on to a couch or bed.
It was not going to turn the stove on, it was not going to drown in a bath tub.
The child was fine, healthy had just eaten.
The child could wait till the landlord came with a key or a locksmith if they could find one.
I’m sorry but the cops do not work before a fact. They come after the fact.
They come after a robbery, after a murder, after the car runs a red light after a child is abused, after a person gets hurt.
It is your job as the adult to take the precautions so non of the above stuff happens.
This family learned that they have to come to their child’s aid and not the cops.
I learned all this before I had a child.
I was walking home when a lady started panicking cause she locked her keys and child in her car. The car temperature was maybe 70 degrees.
The cops were called and they showed up saw the child was fine and told the lady to call a tow truck. They carry tools to open car doors.
And yes the mother would have to pay the tow truck driver for that service.
The cop stayed until the tow truck arrived 20 minutes later.
Meanwhile there were 4 of us trying to use a coat hanger to open the door.
The tow truck shows up asks for $45.00 and then opens the door.
The mother yells at the cop for not helping.
He says he couldn’t do anything cause the child was fine. He had no excuse to break into her car. Had he she could have charged the city for the new window.
As such, the city says if he didn’t have a good enough reason, it would have come out of his pay.
Just like this situation.
Sure the PR department says it would have been okay for the news.
Reality, their Sargent and or Captain would have written them up and they knew it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The other people they found were frozen in ash, turned to stone and they turned to ash. This includes their bones cause the ash was so hot. Yet, this man has a skeleton.
I don’t think he was there at the time of the eruption but shortly afterwards. The stone fell on him, if anyone was with him they left out of fear, maybe.
Then through time, the ash spread, wind blew it around and he was covered. All happening after things cooled down, a week or two afterwards.
That would put him in the same time as the victim, in the same ash/soil depth and would explain how there was a skeleton.
The infection was minor at his death but feasted and spread when he died till there was no good skin, blood, whatever it is the infection lived on.
The stone falling on him, walking through the ruins, unstable doorway, just as they said. Just didn’t happen when the mountain blew. Maybe there was an aftershock that dislodged the stone.
Just a theory.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dustinsindledecker154 - she is young and dumb.
However, she was disciplining the kids.
She was told there were some kids who wouldn’t help and she asked them in the mask why, then said clean and while they were scared she started to scream at them.
Thinking that would motivate them into cleaning, doing as they were told.
She took it too far.
This was also not the first time she did it.
As a parent not knowing what your child is afraid of is the worst.
You dismiss their fear as a dream, they will get over it.
Then you see this and now you know it was no dream. They lived a nightmare.
Yes the women apologizing is a start. As I said young and dumb, probably doesn’t have kids of her own yet.
Should her life be ruined, no.
Should she go to jail, No.
should she have been fired over this, absolutely.
What she did may not technically be child abuse. She didn’t intend to cause harm.
But, it still traumatized the kids and we will never know how this will effect them later on in life.
Should the women be allowed to work at another day care?
Not for a few more years. Once she understands how what she did as such a young age effect kids development.
He running around in that mask, scaring and scream back at the kids was her getting her frustrations out.
That’s the problem.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Defunding the police means they will not get the equipment they need to not hurt people. Stun guns instead of using their gun, they can’t buy radios to replace old ones, they can’t buy police cars to replace old or damaged ones mean less police on the streets when they are needed.
Defunding the police also means the good cops feel under appreciated and bad ones stay.
Defunding the police also means organized crime gets a stronger foothold into the police.
Defunding the police is not the answer, retrain them would be a better one. During the retraining you may find cops that are burnt out and no good. This makes a stronger police department and a stronger community that can rely on their police departments.
Defunding is the same as downsizing. It’s no good for anyone but the ones on top who get a pay raise to spend the excess money.
Don’t let a couple of bad cops ruin everyone. I’m sure everyone knows of a few people I. Their job who are just bad at it and yet get to keep it. They don’t get promotions, they bring everyone down with them. The police are no different.
Don’t defund, don’t increase their budget either. Like with college sports the departments responsible are put on a probation, no increase of budgets, no raises, no new cars or equipment for 3 years. Punish all the police makes it so the good cops quit. They don’t feel appreciated and they are.
If you defund the cops - I want to be able to have any gun I want, any size magazine I want. If the police can’t help me because they don’t have their cars or bullets for their guns, I will have no choice but to take matters into my own hands.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
We are in this mess because of Trump. Crazy has come out of the woodwork. Racists came out of the woodwork.
They found Trump to be their voice. If your not White go Home!
If you can’t go home work for less.
The man hires a lot of immigrants but pays them a lot less than their white counter parts.
The news interviewed the non white people in 3 of his companies, ones he visited as president, they looked scared to talk. They just kept saying they were happy, over and over again. Even the news commented on that. They worked for minimum wage. In a place filled with the rich, they couldn’t pay them more?
Then the interviewed management, all white people. They made over $100,000 a year.
Then you have the nepotism of his cabinet, you have his friends getting government contracts that had to be canceled because they did not produce what they said they would. They still got paid and the government had to go to other contractors and pay them. The money wasn’t in the budget so Trump borrowed from Peter to pay Paul.
The best thing that happened was Covid.
Everyone forgot about what had happened and congress released money to help fight Covid. Trump used some of the funds to cover up what he did, no proof now.
However there are republicans that were in congress at the time that gave the information to the committee investigating him and nothing came of it cause there were other things they wanted to get him on.
This was on the news, on You tube, senator rant on the things Trump did. It’s been at least 2 years since I saw it on you tube.
So, No, he would NOT be good for the country.
He ran the country like he ran his business in New York, and as he found out, it wasn’t legal.
1
-
The US government gives reparation in the form of Welfare. It’s just not solely for Black people.
Not to mention after the civil war, the US government gave 40 acres and mule to families to have free of charge.
Those who didn’t want that were allowed to refuse, go out west if they wanted, do what they wanted to do.
Then you have the ones who wanted to go back to Africa and the US Government gave them free passage home.
I do believe they were not welcomed home and they founded Sierra Leone in Africa.
So the people directly effected were made whole.
Did some fall through the cracks? Probably, the offer was still theirs to take or not.
As for England building on the backs of Black and brown people, like in Canada…. I have to laugh.
The indigenous people of Canada would not say they are black or brown.
They are more like the American Indian or Asian people.
Australia, yes have blacks but they were not from Africa and they are working to make it right there.
India, was given back to its people. The other atrocious things were not Brits but Belgians.
And as with all things the victors go the spoils.
The wealth gotten from those countries are not going to be returned. Anymore then a wedding ring given to a pawn shop for cash.
You lost it then and there.
I think the lady on the view needs to look at who made the clothes on her back and how the workers didn’t get paid much for it. The owner of the company got the majority, from their labor.
That’s how it is. There will always be have and have nots.
She is in the haves category based on her education
And clothes.
I also question her education.
Would she have gotten into college, gotten scholarships if not for her skin color?
Affirmative action probably played a hand in it.
Why is that not seen as reparation’s?
Some White kid missed out on that education and or scholarship , someone with better grades all because they were white.
They lost points because they were white or the black lady got extra points just for being black.
But let’s not look at that, either.
I have nothing against using this if that’s what it takes. What I have is a problem with people who think they have not been given enough based solely on the color of their skin.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AwesomeBlackDude - the reason why the government has such deep bunkers is because there will be a lot of people.
Soldiers, politicians and their families, support staff, maids, cooks, doctors, farmers. They need room for living, working and storage.
But, reality, they don’t need that much room for such a small group.
As long as the concrete used is not substandard (an engineer would know), it should be fine.
As long as it will only for for 30 days.
The place doesn’t look big enough to have supplies for any longer.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
When people are accusing you of something and your guilty the best defense is to deflect.
Fox News was a big supporter of Trump and now they are saying whoa, let’s back up, something doesn’t add up, he had slogans that belonged to a lot of parties they can’t say party he favors.
Mentioning all but one political party makes that party look suspect, by omission, too lame.
The security detail is for the government official, not their spouse/family.
That’s why they were not there.
The cameras are only good if you are watching them at the time of the event.
The glass
Is safety glass, there is a barrier between panes.
Glass will fall to the side the damaged happen. If it glass is broken on the outside the majority of the glass will be on the outside.
There is glass
On the inside, the larger pieces. They do not show up as well on camera like the smaller ones do.
The police come and the door opens both men are there standing, with hammers.
Could it be the Paul was fighting off his attacker when the cops knocked, him knowing they were in their way ran to open the door to let them in and save him?
Just because the cops do not tell the press every little detail like what they were wearing or that both were bloody, doesn’t mean it they were not wearing clothes or that no one was hurt.
This sounds more like desperate people trying throw shade in a different direction to get others looking away from them (Republican party).
As for the “Where’s Nancy?” Comment.
The police do not have audio of that cause that is what Paul told the police the man was saying to him.
It was not something that he said to the police.
So the cops would not have it on their body cams.
They were not there when he said it!
I do agree that tying it all to January 6th is a bit much unless they have proof that they can share with the public.
Otherwise, it is best not to mention it till the trial.
Where they can produce that evidence without compromising the case.
1
-
Something is wrong here.
She is acting like her testifying is going to get her a beat down, like they still live together.
She has lived without him for 6 years. More if you count the time before the divorce was granted.
She writes the article, acts like she is strong now that she is away from him.
All through his testimony she is cool and collected.
Now, she is all tears?
No, you don’t start crying now, you stare your abuser down. You show them they didn’t break you.
He did this to me, he did that to me.
Yet at no time did she call the cops, ask for help from the people there?
Not one of the people there have testified seeing him or hearing him hurt her.
Yet all the stuff he supposedly did were with people around.
She needs to name names of witnesses on the plane, pilots, anyone who gave her supplies to cover up marks, wounds.
Just like Johnny is doing.
The reason why people believe him is he has witnesses that say, they never saw him touch her.
I would think on a privet jet (with other people on it) someone would say they remember this flight and yes,Johnny was out of control and started bashing her head on the bar.
Yet, so far no one.
No one has said anything other than we must believe her.
All her ex’s say she’s crazy, her friends say she is abusive.
I don’t know if anyone coming out before this trial to defend her.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Taydooba - that’s is not what I’m saying.
This isn’t any parking spot. The car is in a small parking lot.
There is a good chance one of the tenants from the building parked it there.
The man/owner tried to do the right thing and let the owner know where their car was.
In doing so, he assumed responsibility to do sue diligence in care. In other words have it towed by a legit tow company. Unfortunately a legit one will not touch it.
Had he just had it removed from the spot he would have been fine. It’s the letter that is the problem.
Seattle has a pesky law that says a car cannot be towed from a business, lot or the street without a ticket. The cops refuse to issue one. All because he did not have tow signs up to warn a person that unauthorized parking in his lot would result in towing. Welcome to the world of doing business.
Had it been a parked in a private residence, his personal driveway, no one else allowed, there wouldn’t have been a problem. This however is not that.
It is a business as such other laws apply.
Businesses have to have signs posted about towing. Private residence does not.
Have you ever been to a store that didn’t have signs up? This includes apartments. This is why.
What people fail to understand though is the letter and the lack of action to retrieve the vehicle now works in the man’s favor.
30 days after the owners were notified, if they do not remove the vehicle, the man can contact the state to have the title changed into his name.
The car can be considered abandoned.
The city then sends a letter as well and if no action is taken by the end of that 30 days they will issue a new clean title to the man. He gets a car for free or for the cost of filing.
If the company responses, they are told they have 3 days to remove it or lose it. If they do not then again the man gets a new car.
So after 60 days that car can belong to him and if the old owners then come to take it he can have them arrested for cat theft. That means he can sell it, tow it, scrap it, give it away if he wants, it’s his car.
So you see, the letter is important.
It shows he did his part, the ride share did not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
My Nephews sued me on a probate of my Mom. They complained that as her Grandkids they had more right to her home then me as her daughter and her saying so in the Will that it was
Mine 85% of the sale was Mine if I sold the home, then the money is divided .... if sold, only then they got fair market value at the time of her death, me - got the remainder.
They wanted to be the executor of her Will,
I was and said Okay.
I did not live in the state and this did made things easier or, so I thought.
They then sued me cause I would not sell the house to them for 29 thousand dollars a house worth 300 thousand.
They got an attorney, turned out it was a real estate lawyer. They tried to sue the probate. They wanted to take it to court, my lawyer said okay, then said they wanted arbitration, me- okay, them no trial, me- okay, them now we want just a Judge to rule, me - okay, them no now we want the arbitration, me- okay.
It got so bad my lawyer had to contact a judge
To rule Arbitration.
Then the real estate lawyer wanted to sue my lawyer for dragging it out that got as far as the deposition, lasted 3 hours when the arbitrator said enough. Went to the court with all the BS where the court ruled your ready
For trial then - which they said no, court said yes.
Then came the one day arbitration which will be the last- case will be settled.
The Real Estate lawyer showed up with her client my nephew, with just her coat in hand. No note pad, no pen, no evidence (which they said they had that proved, I as the old executor stole from the estate over half a million dollars. They came with nothing.
The Arbitrator found in my favor, saying that everything was left to me so I didn’t steal anything as well as there was no money just the house and it is to be sold. In the end it was, all so they could get their share of the house, 5 thousand dollars which they were not suppose to get until the sale of the house per the Will, if I decided to sell.
My point, the lawyer they have does not sound like a lawyer that understand contract law or criminal law. They may also be just a para legal that has delusions of grandeur. Thinks they can add Esquire to the end of their name and as such can call themselves a Lawyer or a Divorce, Bankruptcy Lawyer.
All Lawyers have access to a database that has the name of lawyers and who they work for with the address of their office so they know where they can send the legal papers to. This person does not so again does not sound like a lawyer.
As you said every lawyer knows about the limitations you have on time that you can file. This is way past that time.
There are exceptions such as new discovery but this is not that kind of case. Also you can’t sue the lawyer cause they had a better argument.
I would look into if the guy is going through a divorce. The Lawyer looks to be trying to recover property that was jointly owned and the other party thinks they can recover some money by suing everyone involved.
My other guess would be he had a partner and the business is bankrupt so the partner is looking to recover. Dealing with a bankruptcy Lawyer.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
When we moved into our first home, the realtor said we were in an HOA. We were not given any information on the HOA till closing.
My husband just ticked off the box. I read it. 3 lines that said nothing about who it is, how much the fees were.
I didn’t sign the box and I started asking questions about it.
This home was coming from the builder and it was a new sub division.
The builder was there and answered my questions.
Most were “I’m not sure at this time, I will send you the information.”
I didn’t want to go forward but my husband got mad, telling me I was holding everything up and to just sign.
The lawyer for the seller, who records all the paperwork spoke up.
She said , I was asking good questions, the seller (builder) is required to answer them and he hasn’t. By law we can still sign for the house and if she (me) doesn’t get the answer within 6 weeks, you (my husband and I) can ignore the HOA and the builder would then be responsible for paying our dues.
My Husband all smiles now let me keep asking questions about anything I wanted.
The builder was nervous and got me the information, fixed all the defects within 3 weeks.
The other home owners were jealous.
Then when it came time for yearly dues, we paid up and the HOA sent us a notice telling us to pay.
I called the number and found it to be a law office on the other side of the state.
Asked why the letter cause I had the canceled check.
That’s when a lot of back peddling started. The person checked the books and saw that we had paid but that a few people around us had not.
She said they could not spot send letters (send them only to the people who have not paid) so they sent them out to everyone on the block. That way no one knows who didn’t pay.
I said that’s B.S.! Lawyers send out letters all the time to individuals.
You don’t send an eviction notice to everyone in an apartment building, you send it to the one person who is not paying rent.
I guess they didn’t like me calling them out cause the next thing I knew I was getting warning for everything.
Trash cans not in my garage (no one else had Then there), for not parking in my garage (nothing said I had to park my car in my garage. It just said no overnight parking on the street.
I got a photo of my trash can in front of my open garage door and a warning to put it in the garage again.
In the photo you can see that it is open and I am on the side of the garage cleaning up leaves and stuff for the trash.
No fines were ever given.
We left the HOA, home after 18 months.
We only live in Non-HOA areas now.
It’s getting harder and harder to find an area without them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I hope H.D. Doesn’t tell anyone how they caught him. If they did then people will avoid doing it and never get arrested.
They didn’t catch him because he was their security, they caught him because of his actions. He just turned out to be working for HD and a Dallas Cop.
It’s not Dallas PD’s fault, just like not all black men are nonexistent fathers. 1 person who thinks they will be the one who can beat the system and make a name for themselves. It doesn’t matter the skin color, sex, religion, job.
Stop blaming the group for 1 bad person.
Not all doctors are rich, not all tow truck drivers are crooks, not all repair shops will rip you off, not all teachers are bad, not all government workers are on the take.
Most of the time it’s your interaction, your attitude that effected the situation. Then you get mad cause they were nice, too nice.
Maybe your the kind of person who argues because someone told you a glass was half empty after you saw them drink from it. You tell them they are wrong it’s half full. Just cause you don’t like them telling you anything.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@robertschreckenbach596 - he had NOT!!!! Been convicted of a crime yet!
Bond is not parole.
If he had been convicted your bond ends and you are given jail time. Taken into custody right then and there or told when to come back to start your time.
Your Bond is still done though.
So for him to be out on bond for another crime means he has not been to court yet. He has not been convicted. He has no record of conviction. As such the judge can condemn him for something he had not been convicted of.
Don’t get me wrong, the man is guilty of the second crime. Too many witnesses, video evidence.
However, he has not been to court yet. The courts can’t look ahead and predetermine the outcome and say - Sorry, no bond for you based on the evidence and prior bonds for another crime.
He has not been found guilty of anything yet so, the judge can’t say she is withholding bail based on them.
The Judge also needs a good reason Not to give bond such as based on his record from past crimes, I can see he seems to be a violent offender so I am denying bond.
Or because the women is in the hospital and is not likely to survive, the charges met be changed and I believe him to be a flight risk so no bond.
None of that happened.
He attacked a female from behind, no weapon used.
He then pins her to the ground to sexually assault her but is stopped before and bodily damage was done.
Both crimes are considered petty. Attempted rape is not the same as rape. Different factors to prove.
He has no history of it (meaning no other convictions) the judge has no good reason to deny bail.
It is unfair but he has the right to a trial. The courts are backed up. He can go to jail for that time and the state can spent thousands of dollars defending the right to no bail. He then is convicted but under the law, he has already served his time so he would be allowed to go free.
Had he beat her so bad she had to go to the hospital - different charges.
Had he used a weapon - different charges.
Then it would be worth the time, money and effort to fight his right to bail.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
doug112244 - I knew about the debt. It’s like that nation wide I think, 7 years. What I was saying though if it was not in the original contract you sign with the original debtors, like a hospital being the most likely place you would accumulates high debt and sign paperwork saying you you will make payments to settle it. Then after a few payments you stop. They try to collect, can’t, sell the debt before the 7 years, a collection agency then tries to collect, you don’t have to pay cause the original agreement was with the hospital. 2 exceptions 1) you make a payment to them, that means you accept them now as the debtor or 2) you don’t make it cause they are not who you have the promissory note with.
Unless in the original paperwork it says they can sell the debt, like what’s in most mortgage companies. But if you do not even pay anyone after 7 years of last payment the debt is wiped. But if you make a payment at 6years 11 months 30 days, then the 7 years starts all over again.
For that reason I read my contracts.
I also know about easements and I look for that in the contracts, I asked about it with my realtor before we signed and was told that it was not in the paperwork from the deed search. I was given 3 pages from the deed search, a copy of my property lines, title information, and a section of work done on the property. That is where I figured any easement would be at and I didn’t see anything.
The home I’m at now was before 1980, my old home was built I. 2010. Neither mentioned utilities having laid their lines through my property. They didn’t mention lines running to my home only for me. I asked and was told any lines on my property have to be worked out between you and the utility companies with the exception of water, sewer and electricity. Because they are city owned. They still have to ask your permission to come onto the property to work on their equipment and you can refuse them. However since it only runs to your home it is only you that will be effected as you can see on your deed search.
So this women was not home and they still entered her property, broke the fence. Started digging to lay new cable without her permission.
I did not see existing cable line, I saw her pipes to her home. Meaning they did not have a line already there but wanted to run a new cable under ground, through her property like she didn’t have a choice.
I am saying that is wrong. They can’t claim an easement because there was none.
The cable company cannot say well we held townhall meetings about it and you didn’t speak up then so you have no right now.
That’s why their is real estate law. It says that you as the home owner must sign an agreement, a contract for the easement to happen. If you refuse then the courts will hear your case and decide, again in the end if yes, you still have to sign the court documents making it a contract. Then it will be placed on file in your property, deed , paperwork for future owners to find out.
This cable company did not do this and just took it. It has nothing to do with mineral rights, which is a more scary law.
1
-
1
-
1
-
doug112244 - that was your front yard not your back I’m assuming.
I do understand an easement. What I am saying is it looks like they are laying new line underground, going through peoples property without asking for the first time.
Meaning they are just doing it, the did not have a pre-existing easement. People are saying, you included - it’s a utility so they have the right. NO, they don’t. They want an easement take me to court. Put it in writing so everyone knows what’s expected.
I as a home owner want to know and have some say as to when they can come onto my property. Meaning they can’t just show up in my backyard, they have to get verbal or written consent. I want to know when they are on my property.
I want to make sure that if they dig up the yard, like this lady, they will make it right again and not just fill it in making me reseed/re-sod.
Just like the government can’t come into my backyard without a warrant, except in cases of emergency, utilities, privately owned companies, can’t just claim it and come in either.
Get the easement first before you let them dig.
In this story there is no mention of them having an easement which is why it is a story.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jerkiahhall5489 - unfortunately kids believe nothing bad can happen to them, no matter how many times you tell them otherwise.
Then again, parents may have thought that because she is so smart she already knew. They never talked to her.
My son, smart and funny. Likes to be online with his friends. He would come home telling me about online safety. I would walk into his room unannounced, just to see who he was online with. It was always his friends, I knew the kids.
The stuff they talked about was normal teen stuff. A lot of misinformation, locker room talk.
I had to have lots of talk with him to correct his misunderstandings.
Had I not bothered to check up on my straight A student, I would never had known what he was learning online, with his friends.
A kid is a kid no matter the age, sex, dumb or smart. That’s why they fall prey to the predators.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1