Youtube comments of Auntie M (@auntiem873).

  1. 17000
  2. 8300
  3. 8100
  4. 8100
  5. 3900
  6. 2500
  7. 1500
  8. 1200
  9. 1100
  10. 817
  11. 718
  12. 688
  13. 669
  14. 654
  15. 619
  16. 546
  17. 503
  18. 434
  19. 432
  20. 390
  21. 387
  22. 372
  23. 361
  24. 359
  25. 357
  26. 348
  27. 330
  28. 315
  29. 284
  30. 279
  31. 261
  32. 259
  33. 238
  34. 231
  35. 229
  36. 226
  37. 212
  38. 202
  39. 201
  40. 195
  41. 192
  42. 187
  43. 181
  44. 174
  45. 159
  46. 156
  47. 156
  48. 155
  49. 153
  50. 151
  51. 150
  52. 146
  53. 138
  54. 137
  55. 130
  56. 126
  57. 126
  58. 123
  59. 123
  60. 121
  61. 119
  62. 115
  63. 115
  64. 111
  65. 110
  66. 108
  67. 105
  68. 103
  69. 102
  70. 101
  71. 100
  72. 100
  73. 99
  74. 97
  75. 97
  76. 97
  77. 94
  78. 91
  79. 90
  80. 89
  81. 88
  82. 88
  83. 88
  84. 85
  85. 85
  86. 84
  87. 82
  88. 79
  89. 78
  90. 76
  91. 75
  92. 75
  93. 74
  94. 73
  95. 73
  96. 72
  97. 71
  98. 71
  99. 70
  100. 70
  101. 70
  102. 69
  103. 69
  104. 69
  105. 68
  106. 68
  107. 67
  108. 66
  109. 63
  110. 63
  111. 63
  112. 63
  113. 62
  114. 61
  115. 61
  116. 60
  117. 59
  118. 59
  119. 59
  120. 57
  121. 56
  122. 55
  123. 55
  124. 55
  125. 55
  126. 54
  127. 54
  128. 54
  129. 54
  130. 53
  131. 52
  132. 51
  133. 51
  134. 50
  135. 50
  136. 50
  137. 50
  138. 50
  139. 50
  140. 50
  141. 49
  142. 49
  143. 49
  144. 48
  145. 48
  146. 48
  147. 47
  148. 47
  149. 46
  150. 45
  151. 45
  152. 45
  153. 45
  154. 45
  155. 45
  156. 44
  157. 44
  158. 43
  159. 42
  160. 42
  161. 42
  162. 42
  163. 40
  164. 39
  165. 39
  166. 39
  167. 38
  168. 38
  169. 38
  170. 37
  171. 37
  172. 37
  173. 36
  174. 36
  175. 36
  176. 36
  177. 35
  178. 34
  179. 34
  180. 34
  181. 34
  182. 34
  183. 33
  184. 33
  185. 33
  186. 33
  187. 32
  188. 32
  189. 32
  190. 31
  191. 31
  192. 31
  193. 31
  194. 31
  195. 30
  196. 30
  197. 30
  198. 30
  199. 30
  200. 30
  201. 29
  202. 29
  203. 29
  204. 29
  205. 28
  206. 28
  207. 28
  208. 27
  209. 27
  210. 27
  211. 27
  212. 27
  213. 27
  214. 27
  215. 27
  216. 27
  217. 26
  218. 26
  219. 26
  220. 26
  221. 26
  222. 26
  223. 26
  224. 26
  225. 26
  226. 26
  227. 25
  228. 25
  229. 25
  230. 25
  231. 24
  232. 24
  233. 24
  234. 24
  235. 24
  236. 24
  237. 24
  238. 24
  239. 24
  240. 24
  241. 23
  242. 23
  243. 23
  244. 23
  245. 22
  246. 22
  247. 22
  248. 22
  249. 22
  250. 22
  251. 22
  252. 21
  253. 20
  254. 20
  255. 20
  256. 20
  257. 20
  258. 19
  259. 19
  260. 19
  261. 19
  262. 19
  263. 19
  264. 19
  265. 18
  266. 18
  267. 18
  268. 18
  269. 18
  270. 18
  271. 18
  272. 18
  273. 18
  274. 18
  275. 18
  276. 18
  277. 17
  278. 17
  279. 17
  280. 17
  281. 17
  282. 17
  283. 17
  284. 17
  285. 17
  286. 17
  287. 17
  288. 17
  289. 17
  290. 16
  291. 16
  292. 16
  293. 16
  294. 16
  295. 16
  296. 16
  297. 16
  298. 16
  299. 16
  300. 16
  301. 16
  302. 16
  303. 16
  304. 16
  305. 16
  306. 16
  307. 16
  308. 16
  309. 15
  310. 15
  311. 15
  312. 15
  313. 15
  314. 15
  315. 15
  316. 15
  317. 15
  318. 15
  319. 15
  320. 15
  321. 15
  322. 15
  323. 15
  324. 15
  325. 15
  326. 15
  327. 15
  328. 14
  329. 14
  330. 14
  331. 14
  332. 14
  333. 14
  334. 14
  335. 14
  336. 14
  337. 14
  338. 14
  339. 13
  340. 13
  341. 13
  342. 13
  343. 13
  344. 13
  345. 13
  346. 13
  347. 13
  348. 13
  349. 12
  350. 12
  351. 12
  352. 12
  353. 12
  354. 12
  355. 12
  356. 12
  357. 12
  358. 12
  359. 12
  360. 12
  361. 12
  362. 12
  363. 12
  364. 12
  365. 12
  366. 12
  367. 12
  368. 12
  369. 12
  370. 11
  371. 11
  372. 11
  373. 11
  374. 11
  375. 11
  376. 11
  377. 11
  378. 11
  379. 11
  380. 11
  381. 11
  382. 11
  383. 11
  384. 11
  385. 11
  386. 11
  387. 11
  388. 11
  389. 11
  390. 11
  391. 11
  392. 11
  393. 11
  394. 11
  395. 11
  396. 10
  397. 10
  398. 10
  399. 10
  400. 10
  401. 10
  402. 10
  403. 10
  404. 10
  405. 10
  406. 10
  407. 10
  408. 10
  409. 10
  410. 10
  411. 10
  412. 10
  413. 10
  414. 10
  415. 10
  416. 10
  417. 10
  418. 10
  419. 10
  420. 10
  421. 10
  422. 10
  423. 10
  424. 9
  425. 9
  426. 9
  427. 9
  428. I was on a flight, boarded last evening though I was in the second group. Found someone had put their bags in my seat and under the seat in front of me, where my feet go. The bags in my seat were 4 overnight size bags stuffed into the seat. They did not need a belt to hold them in. The flight attendant asked whose bags they were, no one said anything. She took them. Then I just rested my feet on the bag in front of me, they had lots of foot prints on the bags before take off, turned out that bag belongs to my seat mate, who took it (before take off) and put in his space. He just wanted to be able to stretch out. He saw the bags in the seat and didn’t think anyone would be sitting there. But when I showed up, he was embarrassed. Got over it when he saw what I was doing and took his bag back. No space in the over head meant I had to hold my small bag, once the guy removed his bag I put mine in the space and bam! Just like that there was more room for everyone to sit comfortably. At the end of the flight a women started screaming cause her bags were not where she left them (my seat). She was from the back of the plane. One of the people who jump up before the plane gets to the gate. Turns out since no one claimed the bag at the announcement, they left the bags back at the old airport. This family had no clothes now and somehow, it was the airlines fault. The best part, they had small kids with them so they were one of the first people to board. They had plenty of room to store their bags in their seat area.
    9
  429. 9
  430. 9
  431. 9
  432. 9
  433. 9
  434. 9
  435. 9
  436. 9
  437. 9
  438. 9
  439. 9
  440. 9
  441. 9
  442. 9
  443. 9
  444. 9
  445. 9
  446. 9
  447. 9
  448. 9
  449. 9
  450. 9
  451. 9
  452. 9
  453. 9
  454. 9
  455. 9
  456. 9
  457. 9
  458. 9
  459. 9
  460. 9
  461. 9
  462. 9
  463. 9
  464. 9
  465. 9
  466. 9
  467. 9
  468. 9
  469. 9
  470. 9
  471. 8
  472. 8
  473. 8
  474. 8
  475. 8
  476. 8
  477. 8
  478. 8
  479. 8
  480. 8
  481. 8
  482. 8
  483. 8
  484. 8
  485. 8
  486. 8
  487. 8
  488. 8
  489. 8
  490. 8
  491. 8
  492. 8
  493. 8
  494. 8
  495. 8
  496. 8
  497. 8
  498. 8
  499. 8
  500. 8
  501. 8
  502. 8
  503. 8
  504. 8
  505. 8
  506. 8
  507. 8
  508. 8
  509. 8
  510. 8
  511. 8
  512. 8
  513. 8
  514. During Drivers Ed way back in the 1980’s , when I took it in High School, the Teacher said that the Driver is the one behind the wheel that drives the car, Hence the name Driver. This person is 100% responsible for the actions or control of the car. That’s all I needed to understand that I am not traveling but Driving the car. The Washington State booklet says in the first paragraph that this book is not a law book but an instructional booklet and cannot be used as a defense in court. It did not say traffic court it said court. I took that to mean that if I hurt someone while driving I may find myself in court that is not traffic court so, I should be more responsible behind the wheel. No one had to tell me that. Came up with it on my own. In college I used as a reference a book that was old, 3rd edition and I got a lower grade because the instructor just knew there was an new addition available (before the Internet). The information was the same but it was still an old edition. Same with using old dictionary’s. The people on the Internet I have seen all claim to be college graduates and so they should know that using such an old book when newer ones have redefined or updated their definitions, their arguments are wrong. I was also told that a cops doesn’t have to tell you anything and they have 72 hours to notify you of any charges if they arrest you. So asking and Not getting an answer on “why did you pull me over? “ is within the cops right. The drivers handbook, also talks about who can ask for your license police, bartenders, doctors, then the next paragraph says you must surrender your license upon request. I didn’t need the paragraph to go into great detail since paragraphs before this one has already explained it. When I signed for my license, it again had a sentence that said that. The rules for having that license, says by signing this card I agree to surrender it upon request. I look to the police for stopping reckless drivers as protecting My life and property. So the “Where’s the victim” I point to everyone around saying anyone here could have been the victim but the police did their job by stopping you from damaging a life or property. They are being proactive instead of waiting till after the fact. When people argue with me I say - so you would rather be in an accident with that reckless driver then have them stopped before your new to you car gets damaged? When they say No - I say that’s why they stopped you. You were that reckless driver and they protected me from you. I am always told that I do not understand the situation. Which I reply I do, it’s you who don’t like my answer because I am not agree with your stupidity.
    8
  515. 8
  516. 8
  517. 8
  518. 8
  519. 8
  520. 7
  521. 7
  522. 7
  523. 7
  524. 7
  525. 7
  526. 7
  527. 7
  528.  @barbarajones9385  - I was explain how he could get, how any man could get full custody of their child. Then I put in my 2 cents. The problem is a person can be convicted of statutory rape if the boyfriend is 18 and the girl is 16. What it means is it was consensual sex. The age between the two is the problem. In this case she was 16 and he was 33. That’s a big difference! Then there is the she was in a bar with fake ID. Did he have reasonable suspicion that she was over 21? I say no. Cause the Woman said in an interview she looked young. He never asked her for her ID. At 33 you can tell the difference between an 18 year old and a 21 year old. If she lied about being 21 what else might she be lying about? There are no interviews with the father so, we really don’t know this for sure. My Biggest concern is the hospital visit 7 years ago that was confirmed by a doctor that the then 7 year old girl had been sexual assaulted and when reported, nothing happened. The case is still open and active but no one has investigated. And with that case still open, the judge Awarded him full custody. No supervision. The girl has been removed from his custody and is at a 3rd party, for now. It only happened because the mother went to the news, to see if they could get answers because no one would help her get them. Her lawyer now is working Pro bono because he says the judge did not act right. Meaning it may have been a bribe, It may be he is connected politically and can influence the judge that way. Or The judge just relied on a mutual friends interpretation of the guys morals to base his decision on instead of facts. Whatever the case, the news brought it out into the light and the Judge is scared.
    7
  529. 7
  530. 7
  531. 7
  532. 7
  533. 7
  534. 7
  535. 7
  536. 7
  537. 7
  538. 7
  539. 7
  540. 7
  541. 7
  542. 7
  543. 7
  544. 7
  545. 7
  546. 7
  547. 7
  548. 7
  549. 7
  550. 7
  551. 7
  552. 7
  553. 7
  554. 7
  555. 7
  556. 7
  557. 7
  558. 7
  559. 7
  560. 7
  561. 7
  562. 7
  563. 7
  564. 7
  565. 7
  566. 7
  567. 7
  568. 7
  569. 7
  570. When I was in the Army, they give classes to The soldiers about this stuff. They say over and over to read the contract that way you o ow what they can and cannot do. The can charge more without telling you so read it. Well, all dealerships around Military bases are bad, shady bad. I have not found one that is 75% honest. I went in to buy my first car. I came in with the paper they advertised in. I asked to see 1 vehicle. It had been sold, I then went down the list of my 2nd choice, 3rd, 4th and so on, all had been sold. There were around 50-70 cars sold on that page, small print as well as photos. Not 1 was there, all been sold. The salesman was Will to show Me something else, way out of my price range. I showed the guy the paper and asked when all these cars were sold? He said some last week, others last month, or months ago. I then informed him that, that was illegal. His dealership had a responsibility to get rid of the cars sold as soon as possible. I can understand any thing sold this week but not 2 weeks ago. It’s called switch and baiting, deceptive advertising. He then took me the area where the cars I could afford were at. My then Boyfriend (now Husband) had no poker face and got so excited. I did manage to find a car I wanted. Got a price and we were working out the payment plan. Another salesman butted in and tried to do a mark up, saying it was to pay for his involvement in the deal. I got up and started to leave when I was stopped by 3 other salesmen. They wanted to know where I was going. I told them that I don’t know this salesmen, he was not the one I was working with and he doesn’t deserve any part of the deal I was working out with the first guy. I got an apology, the original deal back on the table. I was handed the sales contract that Just had my name on it and the car info, nothing else was filled in. When I asked about it, I was told the dealership was closing and they didn’t have time to finish it, I could comeback later to get the filled out one, all I had to do was sign this form and I could drive the car off the lot. I got up again and said I was not signing a blank form. The dealership didn’t close until 8pm it was 7 and if they wanted to go home early that was on them. I’ll keep looking, the other dealerships are still open. Next think I knew my complete form with the sales price, payment plan I wanted was on the desk. They printed it out in the time I took to tell them I was leaving, going to the other dealerships. I got a 1 year warranty on my 3 year old used car. Tune up, oil change, low interest rate, payment of $165, a month. Drove off the lot with it. Next day, all the cars that I pointed out during the visit were no longer in the paper. Never go car shopping and let them talk you into doing them a favor for giving you a deal. After that I ran to JAG to ask them about the interest rate 8 or 10%. I was still within my window to return the car, if it was too high, I was going to. JAG said I had one of the best rates they had ever seen. Average interest on a car was 10-12%. They told me how they were in a legal battle with the same dealership that was charging a private (E-2) 23% Interest rate off a 3 year old used car with many more miles then what I had on mine. His payments were $400 a month. His pay was $800 a month. He fell for the sign a blank document, we will take care of you.
    7
  571. 7
  572. 7
  573. 7
  574. 7
  575. 7
  576. 7
  577. 7
  578. 7
  579. 7
  580. 6
  581. 6
  582. 6
  583. 6
  584. 6
  585. 6
  586. 6
  587. 6
  588. 6
  589. 6
  590. 6
  591. 6
  592. 6
  593. 6
  594. 6
  595. 6
  596. 6
  597. 6
  598. 6
  599. 6
  600. 6
  601. 6
  602. 6
  603. 6
  604. 6
  605. 6
  606. 6
  607. 6
  608. 6
  609. 6
  610. 6
  611. 6
  612. 6
  613. 6
  614. 6
  615. 6
  616. 6
  617. 6
  618. 6
  619. 6
  620. 6
  621. 6
  622. 6
  623. 6
  624. 6
  625. 6
  626. 6
  627. 6
  628. 6
  629. 6
  630. 6
  631. 6
  632. 6
  633. 6
  634. 6
  635. 6
  636. 6
  637. 6
  638. 6
  639. 6
  640. 6
  641. 6
  642. 6
  643. 6
  644. 6
  645. 6
  646. 6
  647. 6
  648. 6
  649. 6
  650. 6
  651. 6
  652. 6
  653. 6
  654. 6
  655. 6
  656. 6
  657. 6
  658. 6
  659. 6
  660. 6
  661. 6
  662. 6
  663. 6
  664. 6
  665. 6
  666. 6
  667. 6
  668. 5
  669. 5
  670. 5
  671. 5
  672. 5
  673. 5
  674. 5
  675. 5
  676. 5
  677. 5
  678. 5
  679. 5
  680. 5
  681. 5
  682. 5
  683. 5
  684. 5
  685. 5
  686. 5
  687. 5
  688. 5
  689. 5
  690. 5
  691. 5
  692. 5
  693. 5
  694. 5
  695. 5
  696. 5
  697. 5
  698. 5
  699. 5
  700. 5
  701. 5
  702. 5
  703. 5
  704. 5
  705. 5
  706. 5
  707. 5
  708. 5
  709. 5
  710. 5
  711. 5
  712. 5
  713. 5
  714. 5
  715. 5
  716. 5
  717. 5
  718. 5
  719. 5
  720. 5
  721. 5
  722. 5
  723. 5
  724. 5
  725. 5
  726. 5
  727. 5
  728. 5
  729. 5
  730. 5
  731. 5
  732. 5
  733. 5
  734. 5
  735. 5
  736. 5
  737. 5
  738. 5
  739. 5
  740. 5
  741. 5
  742. 5
  743. 5
  744. 5
  745. 5
  746. 5
  747. 5
  748. 5
  749. 5
  750. 5
  751. 5
  752. 5
  753. 5
  754. 5
  755. 5
  756. 5
  757. 5
  758. 5
  759. 5
  760. 5
  761. 5
  762. 5
  763. 5
  764. 5
  765. 5
  766. 5
  767. 5
  768. 5
  769. 5
  770. 5
  771. 4
  772. 4
  773. 4
  774. 4
  775. 4
  776. 4
  777. 4
  778. 4
  779. 4
  780. 4
  781. 4
  782. 4
  783. 4
  784. 4
  785. 4
  786. 4
  787. 4
  788. 4
  789. 4
  790. 4
  791. 4
  792. 4
  793. 4
  794. 4
  795. 4
  796. 4
  797. 4
  798. 4
  799. 4
  800. 4
  801. 4
  802. 4
  803. 4
  804. 4
  805. 4
  806. 4
  807. 4
  808. 4
  809. 4
  810. 4
  811. 4
  812. 4
  813. 4
  814. 4
  815. 4
  816. 4
  817. 4
  818. 4
  819. 4
  820. 4
  821. 4
  822. 4
  823. 4
  824. 4
  825. 4
  826. 4
  827. 4
  828. 4
  829. 4
  830. 4
  831. 4
  832. 4
  833. 4
  834. 4
  835. 4
  836. 4
  837. 4
  838. 4
  839. 4
  840. 4
  841. 4
  842. 4
  843. 4
  844. 4
  845. 4
  846. 4
  847. 4
  848. 4
  849. 4
  850. 4
  851. 4
  852. 4
  853. 4
  854. 4
  855. 4
  856. 4
  857. 4
  858. 4
  859. 4
  860. 4
  861. 4
  862. 4
  863. 4
  864. 4
  865. 4
  866. 4
  867. 4
  868. 4
  869. 4
  870. 4
  871. 4
  872. 4
  873. 4
  874. 4
  875. 4
  876. 4
  877. 4
  878. 4
  879. 4
  880. 4
  881. 4
  882. 4
  883. 4
  884. 4
  885. 4
  886. 4
  887. 4
  888. 4
  889. 4
  890. 4
  891. 4
  892. 4
  893. 4
  894. 4
  895. 4
  896. 4
  897. 4
  898. 4
  899. 4
  900. 4
  901. 4
  902. 4
  903. 4
  904. 4
  905. 4
  906. 4
  907. 4
  908. 3
  909. 3
  910. 3
  911. 3
  912. 3
  913. 3
  914. 3
  915. 3
  916. 3
  917. 3
  918. 3
  919. 3
  920. 3
  921. 3
  922. 3
  923. 3
  924. 3
  925. 3
  926. 3
  927. 3
  928. 3
  929. 3
  930. 3
  931. 3
  932. 3
  933. 3
  934. 3
  935. 3
  936. 3
  937. 3
  938. 3
  939. 3
  940. I went to Mount Vernon and this is what I learned. George Washington owned a few slaves but only after his brother died. His Brother owned Mt. Vernon, and GW rented it from his brother. The slaves on the land were his brothers and came with the rent. When his Brother died he rented everything from his Brothers wife. When she died she Willed Mt. Vernon to GW. That’s when he added on to the home. That’s when he went out to find a wife, Martha. Once he married her, she came with slaves. They were her separate property or held in trust for her dead husbands and her kids. They did the majority of the work. GW didn’t have much money and what he had he bought land to add to Mt. Vernon. He was one of the largest land owners at the end of his life. Upon his death and not before because he still needed them to work his land, distillery and mill. He freed the slaves he owned and his land was inherited by his cousin and it was up to his cousin to buy slaves. Martha stayed on Mt. Vernon till she died and was buried next to GW and not her first husband. By this time her son came of age and moved into the Custus family home. The one his father left to him. He took some slaves and left some for his mother till her death. Upon her death they went back to the Custus property. GW had no kids of his own. I think he released the slaves he inherited had more to do with since his direct line was dead, he didn’t want to help out the other lines of his family. At any time while he was alive, he could have freed his slaves and be fine. The slaves that Martha brought were vast and did the majority of the work on the land. He didn’t free them though till after his death. This tells me he was NOT anti slavery. He just didn’t like the other family branch.
    3
  941. 3
  942. 3
  943. 3
  944. 3
  945.  @hillsane9262  - she wasn’t caught drinking under age so there is no charge. Therefore there is no statute of limitations. Also being drunk (she does say they both were at the time in another interview) she said being drunk she could not have given consent. He being 33 at the time should have known that. Doesn’t matter the age, if the person you want to have sex with us drunk they cannot give consent. It’s up to a court to determine how drunk is too drunk for sex. She asked for a ride home, he didn’t mean her home but his and she was too drunk to understand that. I would say is too drunk to give consent. I’m not defending him. He is wrong. I just explained how the courts could give custody to the father. It’s not a crime to be a male and have full custody of your child. In this case it should be because he got around the system and used some kind of influence to control the cops so he never got charged, control the judge so he would get full custody with no proof of neglect from the mother. And as if 5 years ago, it doesn’t matter when the rape happened the victim has almost 30 years to file charges now. Just because it can take people longer than 3 to 5 years to get their lives back. I’m hoping this women uses that law to prosecute him. I’m also hoping her daughter charges him with incest for the at least 2 adults the mother has proof of. I’m hoping that the judge gets kicked off the bench and loses all their benefits. All because the judge did no investigation on either parent to see who would be the better parent for the child to live with.
    3
  946. 3
  947. 3
  948. 3
  949. 3
  950. 3
  951. 3
  952. 3
  953. 3
  954. 3
  955. 3
  956. 3
  957. 3
  958. 3
  959. 3
  960. 3
  961. 3
  962. 3
  963. 3
  964. 3
  965. 3
  966. 3
  967. 3
  968. 3
  969. 3
  970. 3
  971. 3
  972. 3
  973. 3
  974. 3
  975. 3
  976. 3
  977. 3
  978. 3
  979. 3
  980. 3
  981. 3
  982. 3
  983. 3
  984. 3
  985. 3
  986. 3
  987. 3
  988. 3
  989. 3
  990. 3
  991. 3
  992. 3
  993. 3
  994. 3
  995. 3
  996. 3
  997. 3
  998. 3
  999. 3
  1000. 3
  1001. 3
  1002. 3
  1003. 3
  1004. 3
  1005. 3
  1006. 3
  1007. 3
  1008. 3
  1009. 3
  1010. 3
  1011. 3
  1012. 3
  1013. 3
  1014. 3
  1015. 3
  1016. 3
  1017. 3
  1018. 3
  1019. 3
  1020. 3
  1021. 3
  1022. 3
  1023. 3
  1024. 3
  1025. 3
  1026. 3
  1027. 3
  1028. 3
  1029. 3
  1030. 3
  1031. 3
  1032. 3
  1033. 3
  1034.  @BreakinUpBuds  - sorry the response has taken too long. I was not notified you had responded to me. Anyway. Look at it this way. Your breaks go out and your car winds up jumping the curb and landing in someone’s living room. No one is hurt. You leave the car to make a phone call, insurance, call a tow truck. Call the police. You went to the sidewalk, stayed there making all your calls. It takes 30 minutes to make the calls. You go back to the house, your car. Only you find out the home owner has chained the car to the fireplace, a stair bannister. Your reasoning is, the car is the home owners now and they can do what they want???? They do not give you time to make arrangements to get the car removed. The car should have just been backed out, left the home? Sorry but in many places, the law says you cannot remove the vehicle till police show up or you have been given permission to remove the car if it does not cause more damage. In this case, the guy hit the tree head on, there is a good chance he cracked his radiator, engine block and maybe the frame. It is not safe to move the vehicle if it can move at all. The owner made arrangements to have the car picked up only to find that it can’t because the Tow company finds the car chained to the tree. There are a lot of areas where a tow truck cannot come out till the next day. That’s doesn’t mean he has to stay with the car. It would have been nice if he left a note on the home owners door (if it was late at night when it happened), but he doesn’t have to. He left a note on the car itself saying he will take care of it. He did. The home owner wants people to be more responsible and not speed there. Good luck with that, he cannot control the public. The home owner cannot keep something that is not his even if it is on his property. By law. Now if the car was there for 30 days after the accident that’s another story. After 30 days it can be considered abandoned. Then the home owner can lay claim to the vehicle but he still has to file the paperwork first.
    3
  1035. 3
  1036. 3
  1037. 3
  1038. 3
  1039. 3
  1040. 3
  1041. 3
  1042. 3
  1043. 3
  1044. 3
  1045. 3
  1046. 3
  1047. 3
  1048. 3
  1049. 3
  1050. 3
  1051. 3
  1052. 3
  1053. 3
  1054. 3
  1055. 3
  1056. 3
  1057. 3
  1058. 3
  1059. 3
  1060. 3
  1061. 3
  1062. 3
  1063. 3
  1064. 3
  1065. 3
  1066. 3
  1067. 3
  1068. 3
  1069. 3
  1070. 3
  1071. 3
  1072. 3
  1073. 3
  1074. 3
  1075. 3
  1076. 3
  1077. 3
  1078. 3
  1079. 3
  1080. 3
  1081. 3
  1082. 3
  1083. 3
  1084. 3
  1085. 3
  1086. 3
  1087. 3
  1088. 3
  1089. 3
  1090. 3
  1091. 3
  1092. 3
  1093. 3
  1094. 3
  1095. 3
  1096. 3
  1097. 3
  1098. 3
  1099. 3
  1100. 3
  1101. 3
  1102. 3
  1103. 3
  1104. 3
  1105. 3
  1106. 3
  1107. 3
  1108. 3
  1109. 3
  1110. 3
  1111. 3
  1112. 3
  1113. 3
  1114. 3
  1115. 3
  1116. 3
  1117. 3
  1118. 3
  1119. 3
  1120. 3
  1121. 3
  1122. 3
  1123. 3
  1124. 3
  1125. 3
  1126. 3
  1127. 3
  1128. 3
  1129. 3
  1130. 3
  1131. 3
  1132. 3
  1133. 3
  1134. 3
  1135. 3
  1136. 3
  1137. 3
  1138. 3
  1139. 2
  1140. 2
  1141. 2
  1142. 2
  1143. 2
  1144. 2
  1145. 2
  1146. 2
  1147. 2
  1148. 2
  1149. 2
  1150. 2
  1151. 2
  1152. 2
  1153. 2
  1154. 2
  1155. 2
  1156. 2
  1157. 2
  1158. 2
  1159. 2
  1160. 2
  1161. 2
  1162. 2
  1163. 2
  1164. 2
  1165. 2
  1166. 2
  1167. 2
  1168. 2
  1169. The same scam is being done here in Virginia but with appliances. I was new to the area, I needed an over repairman, for my oven, and I used Google to find one in my area. After looking at 6 near my home, I called. A women with a middle eastern accent answered and I scheduled the appointment. There is a $65.00 service fee on top of repairs. I then canceled the appointment and went to the next one. Same lady answered that phone as well and the same for the 3rd number. I tell my husband who says that’s how it is now days. Multiple companies use one service for scheduling like doctors offices do. So I called again and went with the 4th name on the list. A different woman answered but still had a faint accent. I scheduled and told about the $65.00 service fee. I book it. Now I am also paying by AmEx.. they accepted this but once the tech arrives, he barely speaks English, came into the house without a bag of tools, turns the oven on and said I needed to get a new stove. That will be $65.00. I know it’s the thermostat, it just needs a new one. I have no choice but to pay. I went to the last name in the list and called them and got the same answering service, booked a new appointment. The tech arrives with a flashlight and a screwdriver. Went to the oven turned it on. Tells me before even waiting for the oven to get up-to temperature that I needed a new oven, that will be $65.00. Again I pay. All these techs came into the house and were out within 10 minutes. I have now been in the house 4 months and I was getting to know people. I got a referral to a family owned company. Called and made an appointment, the receptionist only worked for that company in their office. I could hear the technician coming in and out for appointments. I scheduled another appointment and told about the $65.00 fee but that it would be included in to any repairs done. I book. The tech comes with a bag of tools, Moves my stove away from the wall and opens the back. Hooks up to the motherboard in the oven, turns the oven on, does some stuff on the computer and after 20 mins. Says that the mother board is fried. It has also destroyed the thermostat. To replace it all would cost more than the oven was worth. Then goes on the explain the features that were left that the motherboard would still work on. That way I would know what I could do with my oven/stove. This guy acted more like a repair man than anyone who came to the house. The man stayed for 45 mins the taking the oven apart, the putting it back together and explaining it all to me. So now I know the others were scams. I am also glade I paid with the AmEx and not my regular credit card. Cause if they had the number that would have removed the money directly out of my account. They could have drained me dry in seconds. I am only going by word of mouth now. Not trusting anything on the internet, nothing that comes in the mail.
    2
  1170. 2
  1171. 2
  1172. 2
  1173. 2
  1174. 2
  1175.  @jo-annerichardson34  - funny, my ancestors are from here. They were here before this country was started. Here’s the truth, I got it from a neighbor who use to be a border patrol officer, he’s retired after 40 years of service. A lot of the immigrants are coming up from their country because the missionaries convinced them that if they converted to their religion that their church would help them once they found their own way into the states. They would even coach them on what to say to apply for political asylum. It’s one reason why our government really do not believe so many people really are political refugees. The funny thing is, those who do get through, they make the phone calls and about half are left behind. The church that promised them so much, only took the ones they liked. That’s the reality. The people who come up are not really fleeing from government oppression. They are coming here to make a quick Buck and then go home. That may have been okay a few years ago, but because of covid, we can’t afford to let people come in for a short amount of time and take jobs that our own people need. It will be around 10 years before this country can get back on its feet. During that time we can slowly let people in. But we cannot absorb the numbers that are coming to the boarders today. We just can’t. Unless we put them in trains and just send them straight to Canada. Canada has the room, the food, the same systems in place that are not to their breaking point. They even have more space than the US to develop. Or, we can tell Mexico to stop them at their boarder, take them in and absorb them or send them home. Stop making it our problem.
    2
  1176. 2
  1177. 2
  1178. 2
  1179. 2
  1180. 2
  1181. 2
  1182. 2
  1183. 2
  1184. 2
  1185. 2
  1186. 2
  1187. 2
  1188. 2
  1189. 2
  1190. 2
  1191. 2
  1192. 2
  1193. 2
  1194. 2
  1195. 2
  1196. 2
  1197. 2
  1198. 2
  1199. 2
  1200. 2
  1201. 2
  1202. 2
  1203. 2
  1204. 2
  1205. 2
  1206. 2
  1207. 2
  1208. 2
  1209. 2
  1210. 2
  1211. 2
  1212. 2
  1213. 2
  1214. 2
  1215. 2
  1216. 2
  1217. 2
  1218. 2
  1219. 2
  1220. 2
  1221. 2
  1222. 2
  1223. 2
  1224. 2
  1225. 2
  1226. 2
  1227. 2
  1228. 2
  1229. 2
  1230. 2
  1231. 2
  1232. 2
  1233. 2
  1234. 2
  1235. 2
  1236. 2
  1237. 2
  1238. 2
  1239. 2
  1240. 2
  1241. 2
  1242. 2
  1243. 2
  1244. 2
  1245. 2
  1246. 2
  1247. 2
  1248. 2
  1249. 2
  1250. 2
  1251. 2
  1252. 2
  1253. 2
  1254. 2
  1255. 2
  1256. 2
  1257. 2
  1258. 2
  1259. 2
  1260. 2
  1261. 2
  1262. 2
  1263. 2
  1264. 2
  1265. 2
  1266. 2
  1267. 2
  1268. 2
  1269. 2
  1270. 2
  1271. 2
  1272. 2
  1273. 2
  1274. 2
  1275. 2
  1276. 2
  1277. 2
  1278. 2
  1279. 2
  1280. 2
  1281. 2
  1282. 2
  1283. 2
  1284. 2
  1285. 2
  1286. 2
  1287. 2
  1288. 2
  1289. 2
  1290. 2
  1291. 2
  1292. 2
  1293. 2
  1294. 2
  1295. 2
  1296. 2
  1297. 2
  1298. 2
  1299. 2
  1300. 2
  1301. 2
  1302. 2
  1303. 2
  1304. 2
  1305. 2
  1306. 2
  1307. 2
  1308. 2
  1309. 2
  1310. 2
  1311. 2
  1312. 2
  1313. 2
  1314. 2
  1315. 2
  1316. 2
  1317. 2
  1318. 2
  1319. 2
  1320. 2
  1321. 2
  1322. 2
  1323. 2
  1324. 2
  1325. 2
  1326. 2
  1327. 2
  1328. 2
  1329. 2
  1330. 2
  1331. 2
  1332. 2
  1333. 2
  1334. 2
  1335. 2
  1336. 2
  1337. 2
  1338. 2
  1339. 2
  1340. 2
  1341. 2
  1342. 2
  1343. 2
  1344. 2
  1345. 2
  1346. 2
  1347. 2
  1348. 2
  1349. 2
  1350. 2
  1351. 2
  1352. 2
  1353. 2
  1354. 2
  1355. 2
  1356. 2
  1357. 2
  1358. 2
  1359. 2
  1360. 2
  1361. 2
  1362. 2
  1363. 2
  1364. 2
  1365. 2
  1366. 2
  1367. 2
  1368. 2
  1369. 2
  1370. 2
  1371. 2
  1372. 2
  1373. 2
  1374. 2
  1375. 2
  1376. This is so sad. The city spent millions cleaning up that area in the 80’s. Just to make it a prime tourist attraction. Police went in a got the hookers out of the area (pushed them down the street, to pioneer square, the shop owners chased them away from there), The closed the X-rated theaters. Got rid of flip houses and turned them into apartments or offices. Made it a safe place for everyone to go and enjoy, not just tourists. All that work, gone. Seattle was dying till they did that. Down town is going to die if the city doesn’t do something to get rid of addicts and mentally unstable people. It will require people’s rights to be violated. Loose a few to help the future. In the 80’s it was hookers and porn, no one cared about that. Today it’s addicts who for some reason people care about but not enough to help them get clean. The money to help these people needs to stop coming in. Once people stop getting paid to care about them, the police can come in and clear them out. Some will make it and get clean others will not. But they aren’t getting the help now either. How about spending the money on work houses? Gather the people up, get them sober, teach them a job and they work in the factories until they realize they can do better elsewhere. They will have a roof over their head, 2 or 3 meals a day as long as they work. If not they can get out and do what they want and risk jail next time. The city makes good to sell cheaply and the consumers get necessities cheaper. Bolts of fabric can be produced cheaper, clothes can be cheaper. Lawnmowers can be made of good quality but produced cheaper so they can be sold cheaper. You work force isn’t slave labor but they don’t get paid much either. Same as if they were in prison. What they are getting is a place over their head, a skill, food, medical, dental. They just have to work for it and they can leave at any time. It’s just if they get caught passed out from drugs in the street, they will not be given a chance to get clean in a workhouse but in prison instead. This should eliminate over crowded prisons from non violent crimes such as drug possession or prostitution, shoplifting. Serve their time in the work house and they are free. It’s harsh, it is what worked in the past though. In time they will shut down as the need for them goes away.
    2
  1377. 2
  1378. 2
  1379. 2
  1380. 2
  1381. 2
  1382. 2
  1383. 2
  1384. 2
  1385. 2
  1386. 2
  1387. 2
  1388. 2
  1389. 2
  1390. 2
  1391. 2
  1392. 2
  1393. 2
  1394. 2
  1395. 2
  1396. 2
  1397. 2
  1398. 2
  1399. 2
  1400. 2
  1401. 2
  1402. 2
  1403. 2
  1404. 2
  1405. 2
  1406. 2
  1407. 2
  1408. 2
  1409. 2
  1410. 2
  1411. 2
  1412. 2
  1413. 2
  1414. 2
  1415. 2
  1416. 2
  1417. 2
  1418. 2
  1419. 2
  1420. 2
  1421. 2
  1422. 2
  1423. 2
  1424. 2
  1425. 2
  1426. 2
  1427. 2
  1428. 2
  1429. 2
  1430. 2
  1431. 2
  1432. 2
  1433. 2
  1434. 2
  1435. 2
  1436. 2
  1437. 2
  1438. 2
  1439. 2
  1440. 2
  1441. 2
  1442. 2
  1443. 2
  1444. 2
  1445. 2
  1446. 2
  1447. 2
  1448. 2
  1449. 2
  1450. 2
  1451. 2
  1452. 2
  1453. 2
  1454. 2
  1455. 2
  1456. 2
  1457. 2
  1458. 2
  1459. 2
  1460. 2
  1461. 2
  1462. 2
  1463. 2
  1464. 2
  1465. 2
  1466. 2
  1467. 2
  1468. 2
  1469. 2
  1470. 2
  1471. 2
  1472. 2
  1473. 2
  1474. 2
  1475. 2
  1476. 2
  1477. 2
  1478. 2
  1479. 2
  1480. 2
  1481. 2
  1482. 2
  1483. 2
  1484. 2
  1485. 2
  1486. 2
  1487. 2
  1488. 2
  1489. 2
  1490. 2
  1491. 2
  1492. 2
  1493. 2
  1494. 2
  1495. 2
  1496. 2
  1497. 2
  1498. 2
  1499. 2
  1500. 2
  1501. 2
  1502. 2
  1503. 2
  1504. 2
  1505. 2
  1506. 2
  1507. 2
  1508. 2
  1509. 2
  1510. 2
  1511. 2
  1512. 2
  1513. 2
  1514. 2
  1515. 2
  1516. 2
  1517. 2
  1518. 2
  1519. 2
  1520. 2
  1521. 2
  1522. 2
  1523. 2
  1524. 2
  1525. 2
  1526. 2
  1527. 2
  1528. 2
  1529. 2
  1530. 2
  1531. 2
  1532. 2
  1533. 2
  1534. 2
  1535. 2
  1536. 2
  1537. 2
  1538. 2
  1539. 2
  1540. 2
  1541. 2
  1542. 2
  1543. 2
  1544. 2
  1545. 2
  1546. 2
  1547. 2
  1548. 2
  1549. 2
  1550. 2
  1551. 2
  1552. 2
  1553. 2
  1554. 2
  1555. 2
  1556. 2
  1557. 2
  1558. 2
  1559. 2
  1560. 2
  1561. 2
  1562. 2
  1563. 2
  1564. 2
  1565. 2
  1566. 2
  1567. 2
  1568. 2
  1569. 2
  1570. 2
  1571. 2
  1572. 2
  1573. 2
  1574. 2
  1575. 2
  1576. 2
  1577. 2
  1578. 2
  1579. 2
  1580. 2
  1581. 2
  1582. 2
  1583. 2
  1584. 2
  1585. 2
  1586. 2
  1587. 2
  1588. 2
  1589. 2
  1590. 2
  1591. 2
  1592. 2
  1593. 2
  1594. 2
  1595. 2
  1596. 2
  1597. 2
  1598. 2
  1599. 2
  1600. I have had all the Covid symptoms for years. Lost of taste and smell for a month, persistent cough 2+weeks at a time, vertigo so bad I throw up. I’m told it’s an allergy. I get allergy medicine till it turns into bronchitis then I get the antibiotics and it goes away for 4 months and starts all over again. Except then I’m told to take more allergy medicine. I now self diagnose myself cause the doctors would not give many anything but a bill for allergy. I was sick for 18 days, small decor loss of smell/taste and I was told to take fluids. This was 10 days before the country locked down. At the end of the fever (8 days) I got so dizzy I couldn’t open my eyes or I would get sick. Went in and got tested for the flu (Covid was never mentioned and I didn’t know about it, it was not mainstream). Not the flu so I got a stronger dose of Sudafed along with some meclizine and sent home. 3 days later I have a cough so bad I cough for an hour straight, can barely get a breath in before I coughing attack. I know it was an hour cause it started at the start of my show and ended at the end of it. I just wanted to die or stop anything. I held my breath for as long as I could before the next round of coughing. Like fighting pain with pain. It worked. And after all that 18 days. I was better. The fog lifted. I have not been sick for a year. Keep in mind every 4 months I would have a coughing fit, dizzy loss of smell and taste something for the last 5/6 years with no help from the doctors other than it’s allergies take allergy meds. Now everyone who has Covid is getting attention and complaining about how bad their memory is , how it sucks with not being able to taste food. I have no sympathy. I had to learn to live with it, made fun of, told I’m not a spring chicken any more just learn to live with a unique getting older symptom. I think Covid has been around for a lot longer then people think, masked as an allergy and it was never contagious, till now.
    2
  1601. 2
  1602. 2
  1603. 2
  1604. 2
  1605. 2
  1606. 2
  1607. 2
  1608. 2
  1609. 2
  1610. 2
  1611. 2
  1612. 2
  1613. 2
  1614. 2
  1615. 2
  1616. 2
  1617. 2
  1618. 2
  1619. 2
  1620. 2
  1621. 2
  1622. 2
  1623. 2
  1624. 2
  1625. 2
  1626. 2
  1627. 2
  1628. 2
  1629. 2
  1630. 2
  1631. 2
  1632. 2
  1633. 2
  1634. 2
  1635. 2
  1636. 2
  1637. 2
  1638. 2
  1639. 2
  1640. 2
  1641. 2
  1642. 2
  1643. 2
  1644. 2
  1645. 2
  1646. 2
  1647. 2
  1648. 2
  1649. 2
  1650. 2
  1651. 2
  1652. 2
  1653. 2
  1654. 2
  1655. 2
  1656. 2
  1657. 2
  1658. 2
  1659. 2
  1660. 2
  1661. 2
  1662. 2
  1663. 2
  1664. 1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. 1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. 1
  1672. 1
  1673. 1
  1674. 1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677. 1
  1678. 1
  1679. 1
  1680. 1
  1681. 1
  1682. 1
  1683. 1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686. 1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. 1
  1690. 1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693. 1
  1694. 1
  1695. 1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701. 1
  1702. 1
  1703. 1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. 1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. Well it turns out the documents were not for his library. They were documents on nuclear weapons and power stations. The reason why more people died in 2021 and not 2020 is because they were in lock down and it slowed the speed of covid. As predicted once everyone started going out and about it spread. As for free press, he is the one that kicked out the press so only those he liked and could manipulate had access to the White House press room. He controlled the media. Anyone who didn’t agree with him was banned. Doesn’t sound like freedom of the press to me. As for the other things, it’s all in the timing. The president has No power without congress’s permission. I do not like that Americans were left when the US pulled out. However that plan was made under Trumps term and Biden trusted his Generals to have a good plan. They didn’t cause it was Trumps plan. Even the Generals didn’t come up with it and they tried to make it work. Leaving the equipment behind us something the U.S. does. They disable or destroy the equipment and leave it cause it cost to much money to bring it home. The US has been doing this since the Korean War. As for Gas prices, Biden has no control over them. They are controlled by oil companies like OPEC. They have since the 1970’s. Biden asked congress to drop the federal tax on fuel to give people a break on the price and congress said no. Again, he has no power without congress. The pipeline that everyone is upset that got shut down, isn’t being shut down, it’s just going to be going around areas instead of a straight shot to refineries. It has not pumped any oil through it yet. So how can shutting it down raise the price of fuel for all the companies. It’s only one company that is going to be using it. It will be up and running in a few more years, it just will not be going through Indian land. The refinery’s have the oil, they just don’t have the manpower. Not just that but there are not enough truck drivers to take the refines Fuel away. That is what is driving up the price. Not Biden. Everyone wants the simple answer, everyone wants someone to blame. Well it’s not simple and we have no one but ourselves to blame. You get nothing for free but Trump sure is trying to convince everyone they do. It started with subsidized checks to get us through covid and then we could get back to work. Only companies shut down and went away because they didn’t have the work force. They quit! Why not, they were getting paid for doing nothing. Now we are seeing the price of that. Biden just inherited this mess. His presidency will be defined on how he handles it.
    1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735. 1
  1736. 1
  1737. 1
  1738. 1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1
  1741. 1
  1742. 1
  1743. 1
  1744. 1
  1745. 1
  1746. 1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. 1
  1751. 1
  1752. 1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. 1
  1757. 1
  1758. 1
  1759. 1
  1760. 1
  1761. 1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. 1
  1767. 1
  1768. 1
  1769. 1
  1770. 1
  1771. 1
  1772. 1
  1773. 1
  1774. 1
  1775. 1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. 1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799. 1
  1800. 1
  1801. 1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. 1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815. 1
  1816. 1
  1817. 1
  1818. 1
  1819. 1
  1820. 1
  1821. Her mugshot just shows that she was arrested and a few hours later released. It says nothing about a conviction. After all someone may have seen her in her own car or her boyfriend’s car. They call the cops and she gets arrested. Only for the charges dropped once the DA finds out no one is pressing charges. So, you can’t judge on that photo alone. Although, her actions now, say she was probably guilty of robbing cars. Her actions are more criminal than law abiding. All it will take is for someone to file a lawsuit against the township for loansharking. Her fines are excessive and the city has a law on the books on how much the fines are. Anything over that amount is excessive and it is against the law. Banks and landlords can’t do it. The federal government can’t do it. She can’t do it. As a result of the lawsuit, all, not some but all the money, should be returned. Also, yes, the FBI does need to be informed of this woman’s behavior. Her excessive spending, hiring and lockout of elected officials is also criminal. If they come in though, they will take over the town and run it themselves until a new election can happen. That may take years because they also come in and suspend all elections during their investigation. The Federal government comes in and takes the town over. The good news is, they will get rid of a lot of corruption, get the money back or the city account back in order. They will confiscate items and sell them if they have to. This may include the Mayors home and belongings. The bad news is some good people will get caught up in this and lose everything and the people may elect another douchebag. Then the feds will have to come back and do it all again.
    1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. 1
  1825. 1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. 1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. 1
  1835. 1
  1836. The different font and sizes is something people do on you tube and iFunny. I told a person who responded to one of my comments like that and said that what they said maid no sense and hard to read please don’t comment like that. The response was I will do what I want, it’s how I write and you have to just deal with it. Sounds like this person is one of those people. I am thinking this is in response to the grammar Nazi’s. When I was in the Army, a captain was letting one of his Sargents use his name and signature. They had been friends since high school. They got stationed together and the Sargent ended up in his company. For 3 years this Sgt. had been signing documents for the captain. Then he comes into my office and wanted to renew a car that wasn’t his. Sorry against the rules. It was of a soldier who was deployed and his car was in the deployment lot, safe from any tickets. This guy wanted to use the car so had to get it out of the lot and needed a new registration. Some units do this for their soldiers so they don’t have to wait in line but they do it in groups. Meaning a group of applications come in not one. This guy just wanted this one. I said no, he then comes back in 3 minutes later with a hand written letter from his captain. Their office is 15 min. Away and it was lunch time. I call the unit and get no one. I tell he has to wait till I can get ahold of someone in his unit. 10 min. Later I call and surprise, surprise someone picks up and claims to be the Captain. I ask the usually questions and it all checks out. Still something didn’t seem right. I told the man that letting someone use his rank will get him in trouble one of these days. I did not renew the registration, I just couldn’t based solely on my gut. The soldier comes back 3 weeks later, says he knows about the incident. Turns out his wife wanted the car, a brand new car with less than 100 miles on it. He put it in cause she had filed for a divorce before he left and he just put his name on the title. The Sargent was dating the wife and wanted to do her a favor. The soldier was so beat down that he didn’t care if she got the car or not at that time. I’m sure he felt different after it was all over.
    1
  1837. 1
  1838. 1
  1839. 1
  1840. 1
  1841. 1
  1842. 1
  1843. 1
  1844. 1
  1845. 1
  1846. 1
  1847. 1
  1848. 1
  1849. 1
  1850. 1
  1851. 1
  1852. 1
  1853. 1
  1854. 1
  1855. 1
  1856. 1
  1857. 1
  1858. 1
  1859. 1
  1860. 1
  1861. 1
  1862. 1
  1863. 1
  1864. 1
  1865. 1
  1866. 1
  1867. 1
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886. 1
  1887. 1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899. 1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. 1
  1914. 1
  1915. 1
  1916. 1
  1917. 1
  1918. 1
  1919. 1
  1920. 1
  1921. 1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. 1
  1925. 1
  1926. 1
  1927. 1
  1928. 1
  1929. 1
  1930. 1
  1931. 1
  1932. 1
  1933. 1
  1934. 1
  1935. 1
  1936. 1
  1937. 1
  1938. 1
  1939. 1
  1940. 1
  1941. 1
  1942. 1
  1943. 1
  1944. 1
  1945. 1
  1946. 1
  1947. 1
  1948.  @realloc9719  - in itself, having a foreign bank account is not illegal. Many people have them. Many military people who live overseas have them. It’s easier to pay rent and utilities with them. You can keep them once you leave but it’s just easier to close them, so you can have your money. His problem is he didn’t disclose it and, where it’s at makes it look like he is giving the enemy aide by not disclosing and paying their tax when all he has to do is fill some paperwork out and pay the US tax. He can still have it in that bank just pays the US tax. He didn’t. The question then is Why? As a sitting President it looks suspicious. It is grounds to lose your security clearance for anyone else. Yet this man has it, uses it while a sitting president and no one knows where the money came from? It looks like China is paying him. In politics, any government Job - How others perceive it matters more than the truth. Then to be doing exactly what he has accused other of doing and condemning them while it’s okay for him cause it’s him. That shows how more messed up his sense of morality is. This is his logic: He tells everyone the speed limit is 55mph. Obey the speed limit. Then gets a ticket for speeding - 80 in a 55 area. He will argue he wasn’t speeding. His car goes up to 120mph he wasn’t going that fast so he wasn’t speeding. If we were not allowed to go 80mph then the speedometers should not go up so high. He was just doing what the car was made to do so it’s the car manufacturers that are at fault, not him. He ignores the law, the obvious and blames others for his actions.
    1
  1949. 1
  1950. 1
  1951. 1
  1952. I find it sad how no one remembers his first wife’s divorce. A lot of shady things came out. Most of which were his business practices. Put things in other peoples name so the government can’t touch you. You don’t have to pay taxes cause it’s not in your name. His wife in the other hand whom he put in her name did pay the taxes. And like adverse possession, when Trump asked for his companies back the courts ruled No, he gave them to her, he walked away from them at that moment and she had been paying the taxes for years, they were here to keep. Trump couldn’t get a loan for years. Then there was the Taj Mahal in Atlantic City where he finally was able to get a bank loan at a stupidly high rate, he built it. He also thought he could skim from the profits to do other projects. Found out he couldn’t so he walked away. The Bank foreclosed and all those people were out of work. The bank came to foreclose on Trump tower but couldn’t cause it was no longer in the banks name, he managed to get another loan for it and both banks had to fight each other to get control. In the end, the 2nd bank paid off the first bank (the remaining loan) and ate it. This was all on the news! Time made people forget I guess. Then there is Colbert, He said long before Covid that he was not going to do some things with Trump, around the time he kicked the press out of the White House. It was feeding into Trumps ego. He was just going to report on major things cause insane people were buying into it and the sane people where being ignored. He believed the sane people were not being heard and that he hoped during the next election they would be. So he reports like that about any Trump thing. Not funny, not a joke. It’s just to get out to the masses what’s going on with him. So he’s not a lefty losing it.
    1
  1953. 1
  1954. 1
  1955. 1
  1956. 1
  1957. 1
  1958. 1
  1959. 1
  1960. 1
  1961. 1
  1962. 1
  1963. 1
  1964. 1
  1965. 1
  1966. 1
  1967. 1
  1968. 1
  1969. 1
  1970. 1
  1971. 1
  1972. 1
  1973. 1
  1974. 1
  1975. 1
  1976. 1
  1977. 1
  1978. 1
  1979. 1
  1980. 1
  1981. 1
  1982. 1
  1983. 1
  1984. 1
  1985. 1
  1986. 1
  1987. 1
  1988. 1
  1989. 1
  1990. 1
  1991. 1
  1992. 1
  1993. 1
  1994. 1
  1995. 1
  1996. 1
  1997. 1
  1998. 1
  1999. 1
  2000. 1
  2001. 1
  2002. 1
  2003. 1
  2004. 1
  2005. 1
  2006. 1
  2007. 1
  2008. 1
  2009. 1
  2010. 1
  2011. 1
  2012. 1
  2013. 1
  2014. 1
  2015. 1
  2016. 1
  2017. 1
  2018. 1
  2019. 1
  2020. 1
  2021. 1
  2022. 1
  2023. 1
  2024. 1
  2025. 1
  2026. 1
  2027. 1
  2028. 1
  2029. 1
  2030. 1
  2031. 1
  2032. 1
  2033. 1
  2034. 1
  2035. 1
  2036. 1
  2037. 1
  2038. 1
  2039. 1
  2040. 1
  2041. 1
  2042. 1
  2043. 1
  2044. 1
  2045. 1
  2046. 1
  2047. 1
  2048. 1
  2049. 1
  2050. 1
  2051. 1
  2052. 1
  2053. 1
  2054. 1
  2055. 1
  2056. 1
  2057. 1
  2058. 1
  2059. 1
  2060. 1
  2061. 1
  2062. 1
  2063. 1
  2064. 1
  2065. 1
  2066. 1
  2067. 1
  2068. J. B. - many people have saved their homes by doing just that and with a garden hose. Which is why they started this business. They are making it so you cannot by putting a sign out telling the fire fighters there is a system in place they can use yours to help fight that fire and their truck can be used elsewhere. Soaking the area down before you leave can also slow the fire down. My home caught fire and out 3 a 500 gallon fish tanks saved 80% of our home when they exploded and sprayed out. The water got absorbed by the wood floor and walls making it harder for the fire to spread. As the man said most swimming pools have more water in them than their fire truck. And a fire truck can have around 4 lines at once coming from it. Here’s the thing, trucks empty fast but they hook up to the fire hydrant to refill the truck and keep a steady supply of water. Problem is that hydrant may be far away from the fire, using up hoses that are needed closer to the fire. By using a pool with its water supply or even a hydrant to keep it full, your reach to the fire is that much closer. Instead of fighting the fire from the front of the house you can do it from behind and since the brush is behind the house you have extended your reach. The truck in in the front hooked up to a hydrant, 4 lines going off it into 4 swimming pools that hold more water than that truck. At the pool they can have a pump that allowed 2 to 4 more lines coming from it giving the fire fighters 8-12 more lines to use with a longer reach than just using the hydrant or truck. They business is to rent you the pump AND the hose to go with it. That means they can use even more hoses than what came into their truck. The best part, they maintain it all at just one price. It’s like finding a stash of ammo in place when you are in a fire fight. You didn’t have to carry it but you can and do use it.
    1
  2069. J. B. - it is one that is used by the fire department or there is an adapter for it. Keep in mind it’s not the fire department your renting from, it’s not their hoses. The two guys are firemen and have started a business. They are ordering the fire hoses for the business not taking from the forestry or fire department. So it would be more hoses. By keep the ground wet they can push the fire back, slow it down and if the fire is small enough fight it back on their own. People have done this at their own homes with garden hoses. Also they are not saying the owners have to stay and fight the fire. What they want you to do is rent their equipment, post a sign to let the fire department and Forrest Service know there is a pool and pump there and ready to go saving time. It may save 5 min. or it may save 30 min. It doesn’t matter. What it did is allow the firemen to use that equipment and water till they can get their stuff there. And yeah, if it small enough stop the fire without having to use the truck. Have you ever seen firemen they their truck ready? It can take 10 min. While some of them go in with fire ax’s to clear a path for the hose. When my home caught fire it took 20 mins after they arrived for the first drop of water to enter my home. Turned out the the hydrants on my block and the one before it had no pressure and the firemen had to take the hoses two block over to get water. So don’t assume that because your block has a hydrant that water is close by. The rule areas where they are fighting the fire may have a hydrant a mile away. So again having a pump at a pool that is full of water that can now be used instead of watching it evaporate really does help.
    1
  2070. J. B. - I agree with you. But you made it sound like it’s a waste and not a good idea. That by having that pump people will think they can stay in their homes. I’m NOT saying that. I’m saying that with these pumps you can soak the ground around you slowing the fire down. You may even be able to change its direction because with a soaked ground the fire embers that come on the wind will not catch the surrounding shrubs on fire. A person can use their pool water to do this. The advance team in some neighborhoods can do this if they see the sign out front. That little bit can save time. I have seen people fight those embers with a garden hose. They were able to change the direction of the fire. To go around their house by getting to the embers, soaking the ground from the city water lines. Now imagine they can use the pool water too. I’m not saying they can stay in their homes and fight a raging forest fire. That’s why I used examples of my own home fire. The water from the fish tank soaking the floor so that the wood floor and frame of the house did not catch fire. Will people think they can be safe with that pump sure. There are people out there who think they don’t need drivers License’s and that it’s okay to leave their 5 year old at home alone so they can go clubbing. You can’t fix stupid. But it’s still a great idea. There are people who thought Electricity in the home was a bad idea. Now it’s considered abuse to not have it. Will it be the answer to stopping forest fires? No, but, this may spark another idea that might. Right now it is a step in the right direction.
    1
  2071. 1
  2072. 1
  2073. 1
  2074. 1
  2075. 1
  2076. 1
  2077. 1
  2078. 1
  2079. 1
  2080. 1
  2081. 1
  2082. 1
  2083. Teachers are not punching bags. Your child is not the most important one in that school. As the parent you need to deal with your kid(s) problems. Help them find cooping mechanisms or learn visiting day schedules of your local Juvenile hall. Stabbing a person has consequences no matter the age. That mother is lucky her child is not in jail. She wants smaller classes to help her child the. Pay for a private school where they have them. Public schools have always been over crowded and yet she seems to think that this incident will be the one that forces her city to fix the problem by sending more money into the school District. Yet she probably complains that her taxes are too high as it is and cotes not on any raising of taxes that would help the problem. She has unrealistic expectations. The problem is not the school. I had over crowded schools back in the 70’s and 80’s. The problem is you are forcing the school to be the disciplinarians because you want to be your child’s friend. Then you get mad because you think the punishment is too harsh and sue the district. In a few years the kids that the parents sued the schools on their behalf will be 18. Then learn that the monies win was to go to them but the parents spent it. The child now adult can’t sue for a bad education cause the parents already did that. They can’t get a job cause they can’t read, write or comprehend. The only thing left will be to sue their parents for stealing their money, for not taking over their education or providing a better education with the money. I can’t wait for that to happen. Once that lesson is learned maybe the next generations (that child none adult) will finally see that there are times when you need to make the child deal with their actions. Teaching the child that actions have consequences not just making an excuse for them and ignoring the true issue. Unacceptable behavior needs to be dealt with early on before it becomes a bigger problem.
    1
  2084. 1
  2085. 1
  2086. 1
  2087. 1
  2088. 1
  2089. 1
  2090. 1
  2091. 1
  2092. 1
  2093. 1
  2094. 1
  2095. 1
  2096. 1
  2097. 1
  2098. 1
  2099. 1
  2100. 1
  2101. 1
  2102. 1
  2103. 1
  2104. 1
  2105. 1
  2106. 1
  2107. 1
  2108. 1
  2109. 1
  2110. 1
  2111. 1
  2112. 1
  2113. 1
  2114. 1
  2115. 1
  2116. 1
  2117. 1
  2118. 1
  2119. 1
  2120. 1
  2121. 1
  2122. 1
  2123. 1
  2124. 1
  2125. 1
  2126. 1
  2127. 1
  2128. 1
  2129. 1
  2130. 1
  2131. 1
  2132. 1
  2133. 1
  2134. 1
  2135. 1
  2136. 1
  2137. 1
  2138. 1
  2139. 1
  2140. 1
  2141. 1
  2142. 1
  2143. 1
  2144. 1
  2145. 1
  2146. 1
  2147. 1
  2148. 1
  2149. 1
  2150. 1
  2151. 1
  2152. 1
  2153. 1
  2154. 1
  2155. 1
  2156. 1
  2157. 1
  2158. 1
  2159. 1
  2160. 1
  2161. 1
  2162. 1
  2163. My child kept going to the ER and kicked out of day care every other day, fever up to 105. His doctor (a military pediatric Dr.) said it was normal, I wanted to Go to ENT. It started at age 3 Months. The Doctor kept giving my son antibiotics, we were on round 4 of the 4 types he could take at such a young age. I had to have a referral To go to ENT at this time and he would not give me one. He kept saying as a first time Mom it was me Not the baby. My child stopped babbling or paying attention when I was talking to him unless I was face to face. The Doctor went on vacation or something but I got to see another one and that doctor was confused as to what treatment to do since we had done everything 3/4 times. He gave Me The referral. I go and the doctor is in the room 30 seconds, looks at the baby’s ears and leaves, 30 minutes later he comes back and tells me I’m lucky I am not going to jail for child endangerment or neglect. My son almost lost his hearing due to a massive infection in both ears. He got ear tubes and they drained puss for 6 months. The original doctor was mad, he didn’t believe in ear tubes and took it out on me by putting in my medical records as well as my sons that I was a hypercondract. My son started To hear right after his surgery and started Speaking. He was 9 months old. By a year he was speaking words. I had to work with him after work cause the medical records, I could not get a referral for speech therapy through his doctor. ENT took pity on me and I was told to ignor the normal procedures, come to them any time for anything. They understood that I was fighting for my child against someone who let their personal beliefs interfere with proper medical treatment. In the military I was not allowed to change where I or my son went for treatment. That means I was forced to see this one doctor for my child even though there were others. My son was over a year old before the higher up understood that this one doctor was the problem and not me, the private, Mom. It took the head of ENT, the deputy base commander, my chain of command and my sons Day Care to make the medical branch understand it was this doctor that was a danger to this one patient and not a over reactive Mom. So fight for your child, even when told something is normal but you think it is not. After the tubes were in my child never went back to this doctor except for routine shots. There was no need, he got better, no problems.
    1
  2164. 1
  2165. 1
  2166. 1
  2167. 1
  2168. 1
  2169. 1
  2170. 1
  2171. 1
  2172. 1
  2173. 1
  2174. 1
  2175. 1
  2176. 1
  2177. 1
  2178. 1
  2179. 1
  2180. 1
  2181. 1
  2182. 1
  2183. 1
  2184. 1
  2185. 1
  2186. 1
  2187. 1
  2188. 1
  2189. 1
  2190. 1
  2191. 1
  2192. 1
  2193. 1
  2194. 1
  2195. 1
  2196. 1
  2197. 1
  2198. 1
  2199. 1
  2200. 1
  2201. 1
  2202. 1
  2203. 1
  2204. 1
  2205. 1
  2206. 1
  2207. 1
  2208. 1
  2209. 1
  2210. 1
  2211. 1
  2212. 1
  2213. 1
  2214. 1
  2215. 1
  2216. 1
  2217. 1
  2218. 1
  2219. 1
  2220. 1
  2221. 1
  2222. 1
  2223. 1
  2224. 1
  2225. 1
  2226. 1
  2227. 1
  2228. 1
  2229. 1
  2230. 1
  2231. This was no accident. The cruise ships have had a mysterious illness on them for the last 3-5 years. The people on the cruise ships were infected before the city. Then for just one city to be infected and not the rest of China seems suspicious. Cruise ships are their testing grounds. Then when it was first tracked back the experts knew exactly what to be looking for - A bat or a rat - something that is used in labs. Great cover story - an infected worker infected his girlfriend who then went to the market and infected others. Nah- I think; The lab got rid of the animals but one tech decided to keep one as a pet. Became infected and spread it. A story was concocted to say it’s a natural virus (true just never been a problem to humans- till the lab manipulated it). There are some gaps here though. Why would a government put a whole city in lock down but still allow people to go on their cruises? They had a connection to the city. The Government still allowed people from Wuhan and surrounding places as if to say - quarantine at home or on a cruise ship - same thing. No they let them go cause again the ships are their testing area. The time line was just too close. People on the cruise ships get sick a few days before the city. I think the people were infected, given a cruise and allowed to go. The incubation was faster than before. Instead of happing 2 weeks to a month after the infected person left, they now got sick on the cruise ship. It was tracked to people from or near that city and then the Chinese government had a quick answer. It also happens around the time the US and China was going make a deal on being suppliers of more medication and supplies but was shut down do to the fast transmission of the virus. This reporters are on the right track. I don’t know what’s missing to be that aha moment but I’m sure investigators will find it if they keep looking.
    1
  2232. 1
  2233. 1
  2234. 1
  2235. 1
  2236. 1
  2237. 1
  2238. 1
  2239. 1
  2240. 1
  2241. 1
  2242. 1
  2243. 1
  2244. I drove a school bus (substitute driver), The bus was full, elementary school, 3 students to a seat. 1 child, special needs just got transferred to the bus earlier that month. Maybe 2 weeks earlier. Before that the mother was taking and picking up the child. This child had a bad day in class and demanded a seat to himself. I couldn’t do that and I explained it to him. He was in the 3rd grade. Some kids tried to accommodate the kid with 4 to a seat but they were falling off the seat. I could tell this had happened before and from the kids reactions it was not going to be good. I had to put another child next to him, 2 other kids. They did volunteer and they were the same age and size as this boy. They were getting off, they said within the first couple of stops. All was fine until the bus started down the road and the boy tried to hit the other kids on the seat. Started screaming in their ears. I got to the first stop- 1 kid got off, 2nd stop, 3rd stop finally at the 4th stop the kids in the front seat got off. The kid got the seat to themselves. That didn’t stop him. He started to walk around the bus. I had to stop the bus, he say Dale further back and started to hit the kids in that seat, stop the bus. The child was still on the bus with 7 students on the bus out of the 50 I started with. I follow the driving sheet and the kid looses it grabs a smaller girls hair, she starts screaming, I can’t stop the bus because of the location/traffic I can just watch as and older child grabs him to get him to let go of the 1st grader. That’s when the kid starts throwing windmills. I can finally pull over and I grab the child, a bear hug while trying to see if the other kid is hurt. The older kid said no but I think he is. I don’t see blood but the kid looked to be in pain. I tried to help but the kid refused saying his stop is next he’ll have him Mom check him out. Two stops left and everyone but 2 kids get off. The last stop the kid gets off and his mother is mad at me. She wanted him dropped off earlier. Next day at school, I was called in to the office and the VP wanted to talk to me. I watched the child’s Mother leave the office so I knew what was going to happen. I was told to take the child home first and then go back and drop everyone else off. I told the VP that’s not happening as the child is the last one off the bus. It’s not right that the others would see me drive right past their homes just so this guy could go home first. The VP tells me to make it happen. I said no. Any changes have to be from the Bus director and not you the VP. I tried explain how full the bus was, I tried explaining how the day before the mother wasn’t even home till maybe 5 minutes before I got there because I watched he drive past me and into her driveway with groceries. By law I have to wait for her to pick up her child before I could leave. So even if I make this 1 boy my first stop and then go back and start my route like normal I would have to wait on this parent. The parent’s complaint- she wanted the child to ride the bus so she could have some extra time for herself. She didn’t work and had all day while the child was at school to herself but that extra 45 minutes while on the bus was special for her and she liked not having to deal with the child in her car. Because I wouldn’t drop him off first I was being unreasonable. I point out how does that give her more time to herself if I drop the child off first, that’s not 45 min. she gets to herself. The VP didn’t have an answer. Turns out the Mother said she wouldn’t be home until later but that the bus should wait for her, you know with all the kids on the bus. She was told I would not be accommodating her by the bus director and is mad because now she will be taking her child to and from school herself again. The regular driving told me I need to keep whatever I did up. He couldn’t get the child off the bus, transferred to the small bus because of the Mother. That’s why he took some time off, in the short time the kid was on the bus he had stressed out the regular driver. The parent refused to let her child ride the handicapped bus, the only ones that had additional help on them. She wanted her child to be treated like a normal kid while at the same time wanted everyone else to treat her child like a special needs kid. The bottom line was the mother wanted more time to herself and by her child riding the regular bus she got that time. The mother was also looking for a lawsuit. She thought she had it with me till I told the VP that the school is lucky a parent of the other kids who have been slapped, punched and hair pulled out of their child’s head has not sued the school and or the parent for the harm this 1 child has inflicted on them. The VP told me they know the child has violent outbursts and that I have to take that into account. I said no I don’t. My job is to get the kids to and from school safely not accommodate 1 child who has violent outbursts and puts everyone else in danger. I don’t know if it was the way I said it or that I said there are 49 kids afraid on that bus because of him that the parent is now back to driving the kid. I guess it is easier to be sued by 1 parent then 49.
    1
  2245. 1
  2246. 1
  2247. 1
  2248. 1
  2249. 1
  2250. 1
  2251. 1
  2252. 1
  2253. 1
  2254. 1
  2255. 1
  2256. 1
  2257. 1
  2258. 1
  2259. 1
  2260. 1
  2261. 1
  2262. 1
  2263. 1
  2264. 1
  2265. 1
  2266. 1
  2267. 1
  2268. 1
  2269. 1
  2270. 1
  2271. 1
  2272. 1
  2273. 1
  2274. 1
  2275. 1
  2276. 1
  2277. 1
  2278. 1
  2279. 1
  2280. 1
  2281. 1
  2282. 1
  2283. 1
  2284. 1
  2285. 1
  2286. 1
  2287. 1
  2288. 1
  2289. 1
  2290. 1
  2291. 1
  2292. 1
  2293. 1
  2294. 1
  2295. 1
  2296. 1
  2297. 1
  2298. 1
  2299. 1
  2300. 1
  2301. 1
  2302. 1
  2303. 1
  2304. 1
  2305. 1
  2306. 1
  2307. 1
  2308. 1
  2309. 1
  2310. 1
  2311. 1
  2312. 1
  2313. 1
  2314. 1
  2315. 1
  2316. 1
  2317. romarub - there is an interview with him I saw on you tube the day after he died. There were lots of them and when asked about her he denies that she is his. That's it, nothing more. He made the interview in the mid 90's by the looks of him. In a bio it said he was an only child (I had forgotten about that till I was reminded)but, from a family of entertainers. He left his parents act around age 16. He said he had uncles in show business but did not say who. All from his mouth during interviews with different people. DNA usually has a higher number when it comes to direct relationships. The lower the number the more water down the blood line is. Meaning she could be related to him but from another branch of the family. That would explain the looks and the low number. If a woman wanted to say someone was the father of her child and she wanted support she would not be able to with this number. A bad lawyer could fight it. Fathers and siblings would have an almost exact match, definitely in the high to mid 90's. My Moms cousin, twice removed ( a grandchild from her mothers uncle) looks just like my Mom as a man. Almost sounds like her too. Yet there is no direct relationship between the two. I think this is what we have here too. One of Jerry's uncles had an affair with a young actress who had a child out of wedlock. The two were allowed and some family gatherings from time to time. The child may have had a rough time growing up and in her mind thought it would be better if she was one of his kids instead of the life she had. Now if for some reason she is that anomaly and she is his kid, she has to have something that Jerry was known to have. An STD she was born with that Jerry has. They can match the strain. That could effect the DNA numbers but the strain would be an exact match. ( I'm not saying Jerry had an STD it's just an example).
    1
  2318. 1
  2319. 1
  2320. 1
  2321. 1
  2322. 1
  2323. 1
  2324. 1
  2325. 1
  2326. 1
  2327. 1
  2328. 1
  2329. 1
  2330. 1
  2331. 1
  2332. 1
  2333. 1
  2334. 1
  2335. 1
  2336. 1
  2337. 1
  2338. 1
  2339. 1
  2340. 1
  2341. 1
  2342. 1
  2343. 1
  2344. 1
  2345. 1
  2346. 1
  2347. 1
  2348. 1
  2349. 1
  2350. 1
  2351. 1
  2352. 1
  2353. 1
  2354. 1
  2355. 1
  2356. 1
  2357. 1
  2358. 1
  2359. 1
  2360. 1
  2361. 1
  2362. 1
  2363. 1
  2364. 1
  2365. 1
  2366. 1
  2367. 1
  2368. 1
  2369. @ - 1) I can tell your not from the states. 2) the law says a safe distance while driving true, depending on the speed you are going. The rule is 1 car length for every 10 MPH you are going. As for stopping there is a specific distance as well, 6 feet. Most people cannot figure that out while behind the wheel so the instructor and some driving manuals will say stop before you loose sight of the tire and the road. It really does depend on the height of booths vehicles. As such the law stays at 6 feet. It also says you must yield at yield signs and traffic that is already on the road you want to be on. If you watch this video again, the truck was traveling at the proper distance maybe a little further back which is why this guy thought he could squeeze in. He shouldn’t have. He was in the wrong. Only insurance companies say that the driver needs to avoid an accident when possible. The last chance doctrine which the insurance companies got passed in some states, says you have to try to avoid an accident. Only here we can see the other vehicle trying to bully their way in, they could have avoided the accident by slowing down and pulling in behind the man once it became clear he was not giving up his spot. The other car had broken 2 laws while the OP 1. The last chance doctrine. Which a Judge does not have to apply if it is found that the other vehicle broke the law before the accident happened. A good lawyer would argue this. Sadly a lot of lawyers do not want to argue the case in traffic court cause there is no money. As well as most people do not have the time or money to pursue it. But if OP wanted to sue the other driver under this and sue for a lot of money, punitive damages, the frustration of points on their license based on what the insurance companies say, the increase of premiums (if any), the deductible for fixing his vehicle or getting the money back that the insurance paid out so far, to lawyer, bringing his premiums to what he was paying before the accident, the time off work, the frustration of having to find another way to work, the rental of a vehicle, the suffering from the teasing or yelling from coworkers, spouse, lawyers would argue this and probably win. That’s because once the law is broken, everything that happens after that is the fault of the one who broke the law in the first place. This is what use to happen in the past up to the 70’s and 80’s when insurance became mandatory and cases like this dropped. But the laws are still there and the insurance companies are taking advantage of them instead of private citizens. It’s called complaisance and the insurance company and Courts love it. So just to recap, you do not have to let a car in just because they want in and they are coming from a side street as well as a yield sign.
    1
  2370. 1
  2371. 1
  2372. 1
  2373. 1
  2374. 1
  2375. 1
  2376. 1
  2377. 1
  2378. 1
  2379. 1
  2380. 1
  2381. 1
  2382. 1
  2383. 1
  2384. 1
  2385. 1
  2386. 1
  2387. 1
  2388. 1
  2389. 1
  2390. 1
  2391. 1
  2392. 1
  2393. 1
  2394. 1
  2395. 1
  2396. 1
  2397. 1
  2398. 1
  2399. 1
  2400. 1
  2401. 1
  2402. 1
  2403. 1
  2404. 1
  2405. 1
  2406. 1
  2407. 1
  2408. 1
  2409. 1
  2410. 1
  2411. 1
  2412. 1
  2413. 1
  2414. 1
  2415. 1
  2416. 1
  2417. 1
  2418. 1
  2419. 1
  2420. 1
  2421. 1
  2422. 1
  2423. 1
  2424. 1
  2425. 1
  2426. 1
  2427. 1
  2428. 1
  2429. 1
  2430. 1
  2431. 1
  2432. 1
  2433. 1
  2434. 1
  2435. 1
  2436. 1
  2437. 1
  2438. 1
  2439. 1
  2440. 1
  2441. 1
  2442. 1
  2443. 1
  2444. sis is gone shes been kidnapped - sounds simple right. Just give up your dinner, maybe they had already given up their lunch to a passenger. They need to eat to. There was no guarantee that this meal would have calmed her down. It could have been a case of fiver her a hot meal that we didn’t pay for and since you gave her one give me one too. There was no telling how many others I. That area we’re going to ask for those meals. And yes it had happened before. I have been on a flight where it has happened. The crew trying to explain it was a special circumstance and that they could not give the meal to anyone else. Over and over till we landed 4 hours later. If this girl was known to have break downs because she didn’t have a hot meal the family should have made arrangements before the flight, right up to the doors closing. For medical reasons they can have an extra meal delivered. The crew knew the child wasn’t drunk. The crew knew the child had autism. (The family told them and they took it at their word) The crew also knows that families will try stuff like using their disabled child to get free stuff that they can’t offer. The. Start making other requests that turn into demands. It is best to say no at the start and let the family do what they can. If the family can’t handle them then the best thing is to remove the risk for the safety of the rest of the passengers. Sounds horrible I know but, it is still a business and they are not in it to lose money. They is a greater chance of lawsuit if that child could not have been contained. Basic math 1 suit vs 2 or 20.
    1
  2445. 1
  2446. 1
  2447. 1
  2448. According to GP’s lawyer, they have been asking for hard copies of this website and they were not given them. S’s attorney is saying they don’t have to cause they provided the link. It’s not their fault defense could not operate the link. GP’s attorney is saying the site was locked, and it wasn’t till Sanderson deactivated the link we’re they able or in this case a viewer was able to use it and open it. The argument is without the deactivation of the site no one including the viewer was able to open the link. So on Wednesday Sanderson reactivated it, and on Thursday or Friday did the viewer get in and send it to the lawyers. Meaning Sanderson deliberately withheld the information from Defense. All while claiming he told them about the site, not his fault they couldn’t open it and yet it was his fault cause the site had been archived and ONLY the site or the owner of that page could have deactivated it. Defense would have delayed the trial by having the courts subpoena the content creator, the website itself as well as Sanderson. That wasn’t going to happen. So they just asked for Sanderson’s side to print it out and they didn’t want to. So Sanderson’s side wants the record to show their client isn’t being difficult or hiding evidence as the wording of the defense side suggests. Now the judge is deciding on the wording for the jury so neither side sounds bad or incompetent. The lawyers look bad because they are arguing in a relax manner because the jury is out. When the Jury is in, they behave more professionally. Happens all the time in courts around the country.
    1
  2449. 1
  2450. 1
  2451. 1
  2452.  @danielgloverpiano7693  -yes he would have been. Because he did not meet all the requirements. That was on the news. The stand your ground law basically is a get out of jail free card because you only have to meet 1 of them. He did. The video I watched was on the news right after it happened. I watched it cause I wanted to see what was going on in my city. The news was live for my city and then quickly went to that video. It was maybe 15/30 minutes from happening. It was raw footage, last for about 20 min. The crowd was throwing something at the group of armed males who were in a circle in the middle of the road. You could see the garage/shop in the background. The one that they were suppose to be guarding. This came out in an interview a few hours later. K.R. Was falling back, trying to half skip backwards while trying to keep an eye on the group and the crowd. I see something else being thrown into the group. I heard the protesters say “Give us your gun!” K.R. Trips and the gun went off. The news feed ended there. They had more and showed it later but it was edited. To me it did look like self defense. It did to the cops too. That’s why it took so long for the complaint to go through to the DA. Even then, the DA said the only reason why they are doing it was to protect K.R. Because there were so many angry people out to get him. So the trial happened (really fast in my opinion. O.J. Took longer to go to trial). The outcome was what the DA expected though. A civil suit though does not have to prove that much as O.J. Found out. The difference is, he lost sue to the wording of the complaint. All Goldberg had to prove was could he have had something to do with the death of his Son? Well that wording was Yes. That’s not in the wording in this complaint. We already know he pulled the trigger. He was found not guilty because the bullet left the rifle because he believed he was going to get hurt from the crowd and his Buddy wind up in front of the rifle. That is not part of the complaint though. What was read here talked about corruption of the Judge and the court. Now there may be something else in the wording that specifically that talks about K.R. And his lawyers paying to get this Judge and the charges. I didn’t here it and I am only reacting to the wording in this video.
    1
  2453. 1
  2454. 1
  2455. 1
  2456. 1
  2457. 1
  2458. 1
  2459. 1
  2460. 1
  2461. 1
  2462. 1
  2463. 1
  2464. 1
  2465. 1
  2466. 1
  2467. 1
  2468. 1
  2469. 1
  2470. 1
  2471. 1
  2472. 1
  2473. 1
  2474. 1
  2475. 1
  2476. 1
  2477. 1
  2478. 1
  2479. 1
  2480. 1
  2481. 1
  2482. 1
  2483. 1
  2484. 1
  2485. 1
  2486. 1
  2487. 1
  2488. 1
  2489. 1
  2490. 1
  2491. 1
  2492. 1
  2493. 1
  2494. 1
  2495. 1
  2496. 1
  2497. 1
  2498. 1
  2499. 1
  2500. 1
  2501. 1
  2502. 1
  2503. 1
  2504. 1
  2505. 1
  2506. 1
  2507. 1
  2508. 1
  2509. 1
  2510. 1
  2511. 1
  2512. 1
  2513. 1
  2514. 1
  2515. 1
  2516. 1
  2517. 1
  2518. 1
  2519. 1
  2520. 1
  2521. 1
  2522. 1
  2523. 1
  2524. 1
  2525. 1
  2526. 1
  2527. 1
  2528. 1
  2529. 1
  2530. 1
  2531. 1
  2532. 1
  2533. 1
  2534. 1
  2535. 1
  2536. 1
  2537. 1
  2538. 1
  2539. 1
  2540. 1
  2541. 1
  2542. 1
  2543. 1
  2544. 1
  2545. 1
  2546. 1
  2547. 1
  2548. 1
  2549. 1
  2550. 1
  2551. 1
  2552. 1
  2553. 1
  2554. 1
  2555. 1
  2556. 1
  2557. 1
  2558. 1
  2559. 1
  2560. 1
  2561. 1
  2562. 1
  2563. 1
  2564. 1
  2565. 1
  2566. 1
  2567. 1
  2568. 1
  2569. 1
  2570. 1
  2571. 1
  2572. 1
  2573. 1
  2574. 1
  2575. 1
  2576. 1
  2577. 1
  2578. 1
  2579. 1
  2580. 1
  2581. 1
  2582. 1
  2583. 1
  2584. 1
  2585. 1
  2586. 1
  2587. 1
  2588. 1
  2589. 1
  2590. 1
  2591. 1
  2592. 1
  2593. 1
  2594. 1
  2595. 1
  2596. 1
  2597. 1
  2598. 1
  2599. 1
  2600. 1
  2601. 1
  2602. 1
  2603. 1
  2604. 1
  2605. 1
  2606. 1
  2607. 1
  2608. 1
  2609. 1
  2610. 1
  2611. 1
  2612. 1
  2613. 1
  2614. 1
  2615. 1
  2616. 1
  2617. 1
  2618. 1
  2619. 1
  2620. 1
  2621. 1
  2622. 1
  2623. 1
  2624. 1
  2625. 1
  2626. 1
  2627. 1
  2628. 1
  2629. 1
  2630. 1
  2631. 1
  2632. 1
  2633. 1
  2634. 1
  2635. 1
  2636. 1
  2637. 1
  2638. 1
  2639. 1
  2640. 1
  2641. 1
  2642. 1
  2643. 1
  2644. Hank Rogers - then how can you prove you paid? That’s the point of them. Without a receipt, let’s say you paid and then the companies system gets hacked or goes down all information on it wiped out. They can charge you again if you can’t prove you paid. Your bank withdrawal may just have a routing number or a code that only the bank knows that says direct deposit based on information provided by client. It doesn’t say who or for what it was for. They can make you pay again cause according to their record ;which they can prove/provide for the court) says you haven’t. Many places will tell you they no longer give receipts but by law they have to upon request. I was at a place that the person I gave a check to (always a check for proof but it can take 30 days for the back to send me a copy for my records) the management person in duty couldn’t find the receipt book. I wrote one out and had her sign. She even said she would remember cause we have always paid and are good tenants. Only to have her boss call me to say her records say we haven’t paid. I showed her the homemade receipt, that’s when the other lady said, oh yeah, I remember her because she had me sign that, which reminds me I can’t find the receipt book. The manager thanked me and went to show this new lady what to do to mark down payment. Had I not had that receipt I would have been given notice to pay up within 2 days or get out in 30 days. Which would have been cutting it close to get my check for proof, if the company remembered or found my check for deposit. I know in Europe it was a direct deposit and no receipt, there it is up to the landlord to prove no payment was made. All I have to do is have a letter, from my bank, that says my bank did. All the burden of proof falls on the landlord. In the States it is on the tenant.
    1
  2645. 1
  2646. 1
  2647. 1
  2648. 1
  2649. 1
  2650. 1
  2651. 1
  2652. 1
  2653. 1
  2654. 1
  2655. 1
  2656. 1
  2657. 1
  2658. 1
  2659. 1
  2660. 1
  2661. 1
  2662. 1
  2663. 1
  2664. 1
  2665. 1
  2666. 1
  2667. 1
  2668. 1
  2669. 1
  2670. 1
  2671. 1
  2672. 1
  2673. 1
  2674. 1
  2675. 1
  2676. 1
  2677. 1
  2678. 1
  2679. 1
  2680. 1
  2681. 1
  2682. 1
  2683. 1
  2684. 1
  2685. People look at this as a win but it’s not. Row vs Wade also made it so women had a say over their bodies. They did not need their Husband, Fathers, eldest son, priest’s permission or a court order to seek medical help for a hysterectomy. Breast removal, even birth control. So, if Women can’t have control over some basic care. Neither should men. No more men should be allowed to have vasectomies, wear condoms, have the prostate removed without their wife’s, eldest daughter, Mothers priest permission. They too will need a court order for their basic care. Read up on Debbie Reynolds case. Yes the Actress. Having a miscarriage but her body did not expel the baby, she wasn’t married, no eldest male at the time, no Father and the courts as well as her priest said it was gods will, the baby could still be born: Well it had died, it was decomposing inside her body and the poison it created was killing her. But the hospital and her doctors didn’t want to go to jail. Her case did not fall under the life of the mother because her baby was dead so she wasn’t a mother. So she had to wait. So keep in mind ectopic pregnancy falls under this. The baby will not grow for long outside the womb. No baby has ever survive being born outside the womb but it is very painful to the women. Since the baby is not inside the women, she is not a mother. But you can’t remover the baby because it is still a baby. So an abortion ban is not a win but it is a restriction on women. So, it should be also a restriction on men.
    1
  2686. 1
  2687. 1
  2688. 1
  2689. 1
  2690. 1
  2691. 1
  2692. 1
  2693. 1
  2694. 1
  2695. 1
  2696. 1
  2697. 1
  2698. 1
  2699. 1
  2700. 1
  2701. 1
  2702. 1
  2703. 1
  2704. 1
  2705.  @ncisfan1002  - if the child had fallen, yes, then the cops could bust the door down. That is imminent danger. Not before. Under your line of thinking; A cop sees a guy on a bike, stop him before he runs the red light to give him a ticket. Or Arrest a man before he robs a store because he has dark clothes, a red handkerchief that could be used as a mask. The child was safe in the high chair. It was not going to crawl away and get hurt trying to pull themselves up on to a couch or bed. It was not going to turn the stove on, it was not going to drown in a bath tub. The child was fine, healthy had just eaten. The child could wait till the landlord came with a key or a locksmith if they could find one. I’m sorry but the cops do not work before a fact. They come after the fact. They come after a robbery, after a murder, after the car runs a red light after a child is abused, after a person gets hurt. It is your job as the adult to take the precautions so non of the above stuff happens. This family learned that they have to come to their child’s aid and not the cops. I learned all this before I had a child. I was walking home when a lady started panicking cause she locked her keys and child in her car. The car temperature was maybe 70 degrees. The cops were called and they showed up saw the child was fine and told the lady to call a tow truck. They carry tools to open car doors. And yes the mother would have to pay the tow truck driver for that service. The cop stayed until the tow truck arrived 20 minutes later. Meanwhile there were 4 of us trying to use a coat hanger to open the door. The tow truck shows up asks for $45.00 and then opens the door. The mother yells at the cop for not helping. He says he couldn’t do anything cause the child was fine. He had no excuse to break into her car. Had he she could have charged the city for the new window. As such, the city says if he didn’t have a good enough reason, it would have come out of his pay. Just like this situation. Sure the PR department says it would have been okay for the news. Reality, their Sargent and or Captain would have written them up and they knew it.
    1
  2706. 1
  2707. 1
  2708. 1
  2709. 1
  2710. 1
  2711. 1
  2712. 1
  2713. 1
  2714. 1
  2715. 1
  2716. 1
  2717. 1
  2718. 1
  2719. 1
  2720. 1
  2721. 1
  2722. 1
  2723. 1
  2724. 1
  2725. 1
  2726. 1
  2727. 1
  2728. 1
  2729. 1
  2730. 1
  2731. 1
  2732. 1
  2733. 1
  2734. 1
  2735. 1
  2736. 1
  2737. 1
  2738. 1
  2739. 1
  2740. 1
  2741. 1
  2742. 1
  2743. 1
  2744. 1
  2745. 1
  2746. 1
  2747. 1
  2748. 1
  2749. 1
  2750. 1
  2751. 1
  2752. 1
  2753. 1
  2754. 1
  2755. 1
  2756. 1
  2757. 1
  2758. 1
  2759. 1
  2760. 1
  2761. 1
  2762. 1
  2763. 1
  2764. 1
  2765. 1
  2766. 1
  2767. 1
  2768. 1
  2769. 1
  2770. 1
  2771. 1
  2772. 1
  2773. 1
  2774. 1
  2775. 1
  2776. 1
  2777. When the Jury is not there the lawyers are more relaxed. They don’t throw fits and demand things like we see in TV. They are treating it like any other trial without cameras. This is what happens. All they are doing is asking the judge if they can now talk about this piece of evidence or that. Mostly because if they do things in a specific order it is more favorable to their client. So the Judge has to say yes now is a good time or No, not now. In a lot of cases the time has passed. They were given permission to bring it up and they didn’t. In this case, the judge wants to know why they didn’t bring it up when they were suppose to - when Sanderson was on the stand? Defense is saying because they didn’t have access to it due to the link being broken, it was broken because the page was archived and only Sanderson or the owner of the site/servers could activate it for them. Sanderson did that on a Wednesday after the trial began and they didn’t know it till the view told them. Then sent them a link so even if it is archived again, they can still view it. The judge said that the defense can give the copies to the jury explained why it was not available before hand in such a way as it does not look like Sanderson was hiding anything and the defense are not idiots cause they couldn’t open a link. In my opinion, it does look like Sanderson was trying to hide the information based on the timing of it all. He knew weeks before defense couldn’t access the page and why. Plaintiff did not want to print out the information for obvious reasons - it makes their client look bad. Repairing a broken link till the day of the trial and only informing the other lawyer the day of to not give them time to review it, is under handed. Defense did ask for the information to be printed out for them before trial and they were ignored. The timing of reactivation is suspect to me.
    1
  2778. 1
  2779. 1
  2780. 1
  2781. 1
  2782. 1
  2783. 1
  2784. 1
  2785. 1
  2786. 1
  2787. 1
  2788. 1
  2789. 1
  2790. 1
  2791. 1
  2792. 1
  2793. 1
  2794. 1
  2795. 1
  2796. 1
  2797. 1
  2798. 1
  2799. 1
  2800. 1
  2801. 1
  2802. 1
  2803. 1
  2804. 1
  2805. 1
  2806. 1
  2807. 1
  2808. 1
  2809. 1
  2810. 1
  2811. 1
  2812. 1
  2813. 1
  2814. 1
  2815. 1
  2816. 1
  2817. 1
  2818. 1
  2819. 1
  2820. 1
  2821. 1
  2822. From what I got from the news story on this, the driver was NOT arrested. Investigation is still on going. They did stop and wait for police on the next Block. What I got from this video - a man with a backpack standing in front of the car , maybe hitting it or just trying to stop the car from moving. A man at the back door trying the car handle. From there the car moved. It could be a car driving through the protest. It could also be the crowd surrounding the car to start their protest and the driver panicked. Either case, the people did not have a permit to protest. I get that from the lack of police protection. You do have the right to protest without a permit so long as you do not interfere with others coming and going’s. That means you stay on the sidewalks, do not block business entry ways. When protesting you must stay on agenda. You want police reforms you protest outside city hall, the police station. You do not interfere with someone else’s ability to go to and from their job that has nothing to do with the police, government. People think that this gets their cause attention. What it does is gives people a reason to dislike/hate their cause. At this point, the government says they are going to do some reforms the protest is pointless. You have to give governments time to change and implement. If you keep the protests up, all that’s going to happen is people are going to call the police and say they want these people locked up. Actually harming the very thing other fought for and they want to happen.
    1
  2823. 1
  2824. 1
  2825. 1
  2826. 1
  2827. 1
  2828. 1
  2829. 1
  2830. 1
  2831. 1
  2832. 1
  2833. 1
  2834. 1
  2835. 1
  2836. 1
  2837. 1
  2838. 1
  2839. 1
  2840. 1
  2841. 1
  2842. 1
  2843. 1
  2844. 1
  2845. 1
  2846. 1
  2847. 1
  2848. 1
  2849. 1
  2850. 1
  2851. 1
  2852. 1
  2853. 1
  2854. 1
  2855. 1
  2856. 1
  2857. 1
  2858. 1
  2859. 1
  2860. 1
  2861. 1
  2862. 1
  2863. 1
  2864. 1
  2865. 1
  2866. 1
  2867. 1
  2868. 1
  2869. 1
  2870. 1
  2871. 1
  2872. 1
  2873. 1
  2874. 1
  2875. 1
  2876. 1
  2877. 1
  2878. 1
  2879. 1
  2880. 1
  2881. 1
  2882. 1
  2883. 1
  2884. 1
  2885. 1
  2886. 1
  2887. 1
  2888. 1
  2889. 1
  2890. 1
  2891. 1
  2892. 1
  2893. 1
  2894. 1
  2895. 1
  2896. 1
  2897. 1
  2898. 1
  2899. 1
  2900. 1
  2901. 1
  2902. 1
  2903. 1
  2904. 1
  2905. 1
  2906. 1
  2907. 1
  2908. 1
  2909. 1
  2910. 1
  2911. 1
  2912. 1
  2913. 1
  2914. 1
  2915. 1
  2916. 1
  2917. 1
  2918. 1
  2919. 1
  2920. 1
  2921. 1
  2922. 1
  2923. 1
  2924. 1
  2925. 1
  2926. 1
  2927. 1
  2928. 1
  2929. 1
  2930. 1
  2931. 1
  2932. 1
  2933. 1
  2934. 1
  2935. 1
  2936. I understand both sides of this. The company was mad that they got a one star. They felt it hurt their business, they lost business by it but that also means they are calling potential customers idiots and illiterate. Most companies have a 1 star review, you can’t please everyone and I avoid companies that only show 4 or 5 star reviews. I feel they are hiding something cause no one is that good. On the other hand, the couple wrote about the receptionist not the company. I can over look comments like that. I can look for comments about the work done. So if I saw a comment like that on a website I would see it as normal and continue to research it. Those comments would not sway me into not considering them. The company was over stepping their rights and interesting with the individuals right to free speech. Their lawyer should have explained that to the company. As the individual, I would have counter sued (after all I have to hire a lawyer with money I can’t afford), for the lawyers fee as well as the stress this all caused, with the frivolous lawsuit. To tell me I have to stop asking for money for a lawyer to help get a lawyer to fight for me in court is like saying now that I’m suing you, you can’t get a second job cause then you can afford a lawyer and I will lose! How dare you! The couple should sue this company for filing such a frivolous lawsuit. From what someone said it was thrown out of court. That’s why. How can you sue someone for sending a letter to the BBB that knows businesses get angry customers. They looked at the letter and even said it was about the receptionist and not the business so they tossed it. It never counted against the company in the BBB rating so the company was never harmed. The company also cannot prove damages because of the reviews posted. Loss of potential customers is hard to prove. In his business that is seasonal. So to sue someone at the end of roofing season (summer early fall) for loss of business is pretty stupid and again shows it’s a frivolous lawsuit. The couple has a strong case against the company. They sound like decent people though and just wanted it over. This was 2 years ago, they have 3 to file for it though.
    1
  2937. 1
  2938. 1
  2939. 1
  2940. 1
  2941. 1
  2942. 1
  2943. 1
  2944. 1
  2945. 1
  2946. 1
  2947. 1
  2948. 1
  2949. 1
  2950. 1
  2951. 1
  2952. 1
  2953. 1
  2954. 1
  2955. 1
  2956. 1
  2957. 1
  2958. 1
  2959. 1
  2960. 1
  2961. 1
  2962. 1
  2963. 1
  2964. 1
  2965. 1
  2966. 1
  2967. 1
  2968. 1
  2969. 1
  2970. 1
  2971. 1
  2972. 1
  2973. 1
  2974. 1
  2975. 1
  2976. Defunding the police means they will not get the equipment they need to not hurt people. Stun guns instead of using their gun, they can’t buy radios to replace old ones, they can’t buy police cars to replace old or damaged ones mean less police on the streets when they are needed. Defunding the police also means the good cops feel under appreciated and bad ones stay. Defunding the police also means organized crime gets a stronger foothold into the police. Defunding the police is not the answer, retrain them would be a better one. During the retraining you may find cops that are burnt out and no good. This makes a stronger police department and a stronger community that can rely on their police departments. Defunding is the same as downsizing. It’s no good for anyone but the ones on top who get a pay raise to spend the excess money. Don’t let a couple of bad cops ruin everyone. I’m sure everyone knows of a few people I. Their job who are just bad at it and yet get to keep it. They don’t get promotions, they bring everyone down with them. The police are no different. Don’t defund, don’t increase their budget either. Like with college sports the departments responsible are put on a probation, no increase of budgets, no raises, no new cars or equipment for 3 years. Punish all the police makes it so the good cops quit. They don’t feel appreciated and they are. If you defund the cops - I want to be able to have any gun I want, any size magazine I want. If the police can’t help me because they don’t have their cars or bullets for their guns, I will have no choice but to take matters into my own hands.
    1
  2977. 1
  2978. 1
  2979. 1
  2980. 1
  2981. 1
  2982. 1
  2983. 1
  2984. 1
  2985. 1
  2986. 1
  2987. 1
  2988. 1
  2989. 1
  2990. 1
  2991. 1
  2992. 1
  2993. 1
  2994. 1
  2995. 1
  2996. 1
  2997. 1
  2998. 1
  2999. 1
  3000. 1
  3001. 1
  3002. 1
  3003. 1
  3004. 1
  3005. 1
  3006. 1
  3007. 1
  3008. 1
  3009. 1
  3010. 1
  3011. 1
  3012. 1
  3013. 1
  3014. 1
  3015. 1
  3016. We are in this mess because of Trump. Crazy has come out of the woodwork. Racists came out of the woodwork. They found Trump to be their voice. If your not White go Home! If you can’t go home work for less. The man hires a lot of immigrants but pays them a lot less than their white counter parts. The news interviewed the non white people in 3 of his companies, ones he visited as president, they looked scared to talk. They just kept saying they were happy, over and over again. Even the news commented on that. They worked for minimum wage. In a place filled with the rich, they couldn’t pay them more? Then the interviewed management, all white people. They made over $100,000 a year. Then you have the nepotism of his cabinet, you have his friends getting government contracts that had to be canceled because they did not produce what they said they would. They still got paid and the government had to go to other contractors and pay them. The money wasn’t in the budget so Trump borrowed from Peter to pay Paul. The best thing that happened was Covid. Everyone forgot about what had happened and congress released money to help fight Covid. Trump used some of the funds to cover up what he did, no proof now. However there are republicans that were in congress at the time that gave the information to the committee investigating him and nothing came of it cause there were other things they wanted to get him on. This was on the news, on You tube, senator rant on the things Trump did. It’s been at least 2 years since I saw it on you tube. So, No, he would NOT be good for the country. He ran the country like he ran his business in New York, and as he found out, it wasn’t legal.
    1
  3017. The US government gives reparation in the form of Welfare. It’s just not solely for Black people. Not to mention after the civil war, the US government gave 40 acres and mule to families to have free of charge. Those who didn’t want that were allowed to refuse, go out west if they wanted, do what they wanted to do. Then you have the ones who wanted to go back to Africa and the US Government gave them free passage home. I do believe they were not welcomed home and they founded Sierra Leone in Africa. So the people directly effected were made whole. Did some fall through the cracks? Probably, the offer was still theirs to take or not. As for England building on the backs of Black and brown people, like in Canada…. I have to laugh. The indigenous people of Canada would not say they are black or brown. They are more like the American Indian or Asian people. Australia, yes have blacks but they were not from Africa and they are working to make it right there. India, was given back to its people. The other atrocious things were not Brits but Belgians. And as with all things the victors go the spoils. The wealth gotten from those countries are not going to be returned. Anymore then a wedding ring given to a pawn shop for cash. You lost it then and there. I think the lady on the view needs to look at who made the clothes on her back and how the workers didn’t get paid much for it. The owner of the company got the majority, from their labor. That’s how it is. There will always be have and have nots. She is in the haves category based on her education And clothes. I also question her education. Would she have gotten into college, gotten scholarships if not for her skin color? Affirmative action probably played a hand in it. Why is that not seen as reparation’s? Some White kid missed out on that education and or scholarship , someone with better grades all because they were white. They lost points because they were white or the black lady got extra points just for being black. But let’s not look at that, either. I have nothing against using this if that’s what it takes. What I have is a problem with people who think they have not been given enough based solely on the color of their skin.
    1
  3018. 1
  3019. 1
  3020. I do feel sorry for the Mother and wife of that Soldier. I truly do. Let’s face facts though - it was going to happen this way from the very beginning. History has shown this from that side of the world. Republicans sent soldiers there 20 years ago. (Bush JR) Just because the President that pulls the troops out is a Democrat would not have changed anything. The plan for pulling out was not Biden’s. It was a plan made 20 years ago. No one upgraded. All the commander and chief says is to pull out and it is up the that leadership, the ones on the ground to figure out how to do it. They failed. Why is the mystery. Was it Congress not will to spend the money? Was it the President who said no more stuff is being sent - you have x amount of planes get on them and no other support? Was it ambassadors who tried to get people out above US lives the ones who threw a wench in the plan? Do not blame people for their political affiliation. Do not blame the voters for getting out someone who had No business being the President. Then cried about it cause now all his back door money deals for his family and company are at an end. When he said he created jobs he meant he created jobs by hiring people for his staff at the White House. The unemployment numbers dropped because people used up their benefits and were dropped from the rolls. Covid was a blessing cause these people got extra money and put back on the rolls. Unemployment didn’t spike because of Biden, they spiked because the people got back on the rolls. Trump manipulates his claim by telling people half truths - Yes, Americans got employed because of him (his staff), yes under Biden unemployment went up - they got back on the rolls for unemployment because he got more money to help people pay bills. Never mind the same people were unemployed while he was President. People seem to ignore that under Trump open racism went up to numbers the US hadn’t seen since the 1950’s and 60’s. He refused to talk about it and distracted people with his everyday press conference about Covid-19 or whatever he wanted to talk about as long as it was not about BLM till it was too late. That is called wag the Dog - distract the people from the real issues/problems by showing them something nice like a dog waging its tail. Nothing gets solved but isn’t that a cute dog? The truth is Trump was a bad President and anyone else running would have been better.
    1
  3021. 1
  3022. 1
  3023. 1
  3024. 1
  3025. 1
  3026. 1
  3027. 1
  3028. PHARAOH GxDMxD3 - I understand what your saying. It is a factor too. But there is no proof of starving the kids. You need the kids to prove that. You need the kids to prove everything everyone is saying. Without them the cops/CPS have nothing. All evidence so far says she was a loving Mother. Yes, she may not be but there is no proof of it. Try this - Tylee was 17, moved 2 times and her father was murdered by her Uncle. She could be moody and decided to run away. Her younger brother decided to go with her and Tylee couldn’t say no. She is looking after him. Where is the crime the mother committed? Failing to file a report of a missing child is a misdemeanor and the state will not spend money (thousands of dollars) to extradite a person for a misdemeanor which could be a fine of $1.00. Cops have to justify their spending. Instead they could be spending their time investigating the homes, cars, neighbors, friends, all without the parents interference. They have to do it anyway. Then let the couple come back on their own while they think their safe cause they haven’t been arrested. I think we need to look at other things here that may help. Like why hasn’t a judge taken away their passports? They can’t fly without them. The reporters are keeping an eye on them for police and reporting their every move so leaving by boat may be hard. Any cruse ship will want a passport and if they have them they can be tracked that way too. What more can the law do without evidence? I think their bank accounts should be frozen as well as passports seized. The courts should be able to do that even with a misdemeanor. They pose a flight risk. They have wades of cash so maybe they don’t have bank accounts anymore.
    1
  3029. 1
  3030. 1
  3031. 1
  3032. 1
  3033. 1
  3034. 1
  3035. 1
  3036. 1
  3037. 1
  3038. 1
  3039. 1
  3040. 1
  3041. 1
  3042. 1
  3043. The problem with the lady at the salon, she said it was stuff she had already learned in school and got certification in. Why does she need training? She already has the job based on her credentials. If the salon owner wanted to make sure she knew what she was doing then she could have tested her before she hired her. The salon industry as well as the medical industry, certification is based on tests the individual takes based on the states requirements and not the hospitals/salons. A company may pay for those tests or not but they are not classes, they are tests to make sure a person is certified, meets certain industry standards. The salon and hospitals do not have classes to take the certification tests and pass. It is based on the individual doing the studying for the test. Any additional training is not for certification but the refresh what they should already know and the hospital makes sure that those in Geriatrics still remember how to treat a gun shot wound or deliver a baby. Because they may be rusty in those areas being stuck in one specific area. Same with a salon. Why do training on how to dye hair when they already know how to do that from school and it’s part of their certification? How can this salon owner then charge for this refresher training when the person doesn’t need it because they have a certification that is less than a year old or however long the certification is good for. Again the salon owner is not training based on the state’s requirements but her own need and she is not doing the certification. Just show how she wants it done in her salon. How is that training that she can charge for? Also how can you charge for the training when the person doing the training is not certified to train such a skill that involves the mixing of chemicals? Then not tell the employee that they are charging for the training, give them the option to decline, or inform them of how long they have to work so there is no fee. In this case, My argument would be the employee was already paying for the training by getting paid less then the agreed amount for which she was hired for and told she would get the higher pay after training. She took a pay cut for that supposed training of how they like it done at that salon.
    1
  3044. 1
  3045. 1
  3046. 1
  3047. 1
  3048. 1
  3049. 1
  3050. 1
  3051. 1
  3052. 1
  3053. 1
  3054. 1
  3055. 1
  3056. 1
  3057. 1
  3058. 1
  3059. 1
  3060. 1
  3061. 1
  3062. 1
  3063. 1
  3064. 1
  3065. 1
  3066. 1
  3067. 1
  3068. 1
  3069. 1
  3070. 1
  3071. 1
  3072. 1
  3073. 1
  3074. 1
  3075. 1
  3076. 1
  3077. 1
  3078. 1
  3079. 1
  3080. 1
  3081. 1
  3082. 1
  3083. 1
  3084. 1
  3085. 1
  3086. 1
  3087. 1
  3088. 1
  3089. 1
  3090. 1
  3091. 1
  3092. 1
  3093. 1
  3094. 1
  3095. 1
  3096. 1
  3097. 1
  3098. 1
  3099. 1
  3100. 1
  3101. 1
  3102. 1
  3103. 1
  3104. 1
  3105. 1
  3106. 1
  3107. 1
  3108. 1
  3109. 1
  3110. 1
  3111. 1
  3112. 1
  3113. 1
  3114. 1
  3115. 1
  3116. 1
  3117. 1
  3118. 1
  3119. 1
  3120. 1
  3121. 1
  3122. 1
  3123. 1
  3124. 1
  3125. 1
  3126. 1
  3127. 1
  3128. 1
  3129. 1
  3130. 1
  3131. 1
  3132. 1
  3133. 1
  3134. 1
  3135. 1
  3136. 1
  3137. 1
  3138. 1
  3139. 1
  3140. 1
  3141. 1
  3142. 1
  3143. 1
  3144. 1
  3145. 1
  3146. 1
  3147. 1
  3148. 1
  3149. 1
  3150. 1
  3151. 1
  3152. 1
  3153. 1
  3154. 1
  3155. 1
  3156. 1
  3157. 1
  3158. 1
  3159. 1
  3160. 1
  3161. 1
  3162. When people are accusing you of something and your guilty the best defense is to deflect. Fox News was a big supporter of Trump and now they are saying whoa, let’s back up, something doesn’t add up, he had slogans that belonged to a lot of parties they can’t say party he favors. Mentioning all but one political party makes that party look suspect, by omission, too lame. The security detail is for the government official, not their spouse/family. That’s why they were not there. The cameras are only good if you are watching them at the time of the event. The glass Is safety glass, there is a barrier between panes. Glass will fall to the side the damaged happen. If it glass is broken on the outside the majority of the glass will be on the outside. There is glass On the inside, the larger pieces. They do not show up as well on camera like the smaller ones do. The police come and the door opens both men are there standing, with hammers. Could it be the Paul was fighting off his attacker when the cops knocked, him knowing they were in their way ran to open the door to let them in and save him? Just because the cops do not tell the press every little detail like what they were wearing or that both were bloody, doesn’t mean it they were not wearing clothes or that no one was hurt. This sounds more like desperate people trying throw shade in a different direction to get others looking away from them (Republican party). As for the “Where’s Nancy?” Comment. The police do not have audio of that cause that is what Paul told the police the man was saying to him. It was not something that he said to the police. So the cops would not have it on their body cams. They were not there when he said it! I do agree that tying it all to January 6th is a bit much unless they have proof that they can share with the public. Otherwise, it is best not to mention it till the trial. Where they can produce that evidence without compromising the case.
    1
  3163. 1
  3164. 1
  3165. 1
  3166. 1
  3167. 1
  3168. 1
  3169. 1
  3170. 1
  3171. 1
  3172. 1
  3173. 1
  3174. 1
  3175. 1
  3176. 1
  3177. 1
  3178. 1
  3179. 1
  3180. 1
  3181. 1
  3182. 1
  3183. 1
  3184. 1
  3185. 1
  3186. 1
  3187. 1
  3188. 1
  3189. 1
  3190. 1
  3191. 1
  3192. 1
  3193. 1
  3194. 1
  3195. 1
  3196. 1
  3197. 1
  3198. 1
  3199. 1
  3200. 1
  3201. 1
  3202. 1
  3203. 1
  3204. 1
  3205. 1
  3206. 1
  3207. 1
  3208. 1
  3209. 1
  3210. 1
  3211. 1
  3212. 1
  3213. 1
  3214. 1
  3215. 1
  3216. 1
  3217. 1
  3218. 1
  3219. 1
  3220. 1
  3221. 1
  3222. 1
  3223. 1
  3224. 1
  3225. 1
  3226. 1
  3227. 1
  3228. 1
  3229. 1
  3230. 1
  3231. 1
  3232. 1
  3233. 1
  3234. 1
  3235. 1
  3236. 1
  3237. 1
  3238. 1
  3239. 1
  3240. 1
  3241. 1
  3242. 1
  3243. 1
  3244. 1
  3245. 1
  3246. 1
  3247. 1
  3248. 1
  3249. 1
  3250. 1
  3251. 1
  3252. 1
  3253. 1
  3254. 1
  3255. 1
  3256. 1
  3257. 1
  3258. 1
  3259. 1
  3260. 1
  3261. 1
  3262. 1
  3263. 1
  3264. 1
  3265. 1
  3266. 1
  3267. I agree that schools are not teaching civics anymore. I got just a taste of it in the 80’s. Not anything like my parents did. I am told by my son and husband that I am wrong in my thinking when I say that’s illegal. I’m told that the President has discretionary powers and that allows them to do these things. I say No, that’s why each branch does not have to answer to the president. They are there to make sure the office does not over step it’s boundaries just like the other branches check each other. They say No, the parties take over and that it’s what the party wants. Our government no longer does what it was designed to do but what the founding fathers feared. It’s political party not the people that run the system. The president is the leader of his party and so that party gets their agenda through not what the people want or need. We are more the British system than ever before. Which may explain how people think that the government has the power to take out guns away. Because the parties say they can and if the party is in charge then that’s what they will do. Totally opposite of what our constitution says. These people do not understand the reason behind putting the right to bare arms in the constitution. How the government is not allowed to take them because the don’t want the people to have them. This really does sound like the government wants them and then once gone that party will have absolute power. The people will have no say or ability to stop them. History says that the Red Coats came in taking people’s weapons so that they could not be used against them. Then they came in and seized peoples property. We had a war to say no more. I see that same pattern happening now.
    1
  3268. 1
  3269. 1
  3270. 1
  3271. 1
  3272. 1
  3273. 1
  3274. 1
  3275. 1
  3276. 1
  3277. I tried to warn people about stuff like this and I was told it would not come to it because cases like this are less then 1%. It happens more than people understand. As for women going to have abortions because they don’t want a baby, the people think that is the only thing the ban is going to effect, I hope they see this. Abortion as birth control should be addressed. The government should not provide it for free. But it should be allowed just for these cases. In other words. Abortions should be legal in case something happens to the baby during the pregnancy or if it is a risk to the mother which there is a risk to the woman during 100% of pregnancy. Any woman can bleed out during or after a normal pregnancy. The government should not pay for it though. That way a woman who uses it because she doesn’t want to take any precautions is the ones we want to stop. Abortions should not be a birth control plan. If that’s what you want it for then the women needs to pay for it out of her pockets not tax payers. If insurance companies had it on their plan (people buying abortion plans) then I guarantee there would be a limit as to how many they would cover and under restrictions. Then the women might take precautions to make sure she is covered because she is now limited. The doctor should not have to worry about their livelihood or about the hospitals if they perform them. As you said there are cases where women need them the 10 year old who is raped. Where the government said it was legal but only if they report it to the police and press charges. Sorry sweetie but you need to go with these nice police officers and tell them what the man did to you, and get all the details, relive it for them. Then read it in the paper they give you, if it’s wrong tell them where it’s wrong, keep reading the form till it’s right then sign it. Then we can take you to the doctors to get rid of it. Very few adult women can do that but we are going to make 10 year olds or younger do this. But hey! We are saving that babies life!
    1
  3278. 1
  3279. 1
  3280. 1
  3281. 1
  3282. 1
  3283. 1
  3284. 1
  3285. 1
  3286. 1
  3287. 1
  3288. 1
  3289. 1
  3290. 1
  3291. 1
  3292. 1
  3293. 1
  3294. 1
  3295. 1
  3296. 1
  3297. 1
  3298. 1
  3299. 1
  3300. 1
  3301. 1
  3302. 1
  3303. 1
  3304. 1
  3305. 1
  3306. 1
  3307. 1
  3308. 1
  3309. 1
  3310. 1
  3311. 1
  3312. 1
  3313. 1
  3314. 1
  3315. 1
  3316. 1
  3317. 1
  3318. 1
  3319. 1
  3320. 1
  3321. 1
  3322. 1
  3323. 1
  3324. 1
  3325. 1
  3326. 1
  3327. 1
  3328. 1
  3329. 1
  3330. 1
  3331. 1
  3332. 1
  3333. 1
  3334. 1
  3335. 1
  3336. 1
  3337. 1
  3338. 1
  3339. 1
  3340. 1
  3341. 1
  3342. 1
  3343. 1
  3344. 1
  3345. 1
  3346. 1
  3347. 1
  3348. 1
  3349. 1
  3350. 1
  3351. 1
  3352. 1
  3353. 1
  3354. 1
  3355. 1
  3356. 1
  3357. 1
  3358. 1
  3359. 1
  3360. 1
  3361. 1
  3362. 1
  3363. 1
  3364. 1
  3365. 1
  3366. 1
  3367. 1
  3368. 1
  3369. 1
  3370. 1
  3371. 1
  3372. 1
  3373. 1
  3374. 1
  3375. 1
  3376. 1
  3377. 1
  3378. 1
  3379. 1
  3380. 1
  3381. 1
  3382. 1
  3383. 1
  3384. 1
  3385. 1
  3386.  @brianm6117  - if he moved the car off his property and the car got damaged he would be responsible. He moved the car into harms way. That’s what I’m saying. If he leaves the car there on his property and it gets damaged then different story. If not for the land owners actions the car was damaged. If he had left it alone, on his property, it was in a safe spot. In a parking spot just on his property. If it got damaged or stolen from there he holds no liability cause reasonable care was taken - it was in a parking spot. That’s all he has to do. It’s the taking it from that spot, him not being the owner that is the problem. Just as in a mechanic shop. The car was secured and if not for the owners actions moving it to the street, allowing it to get damaged, the person who was in last possession of it was held liable. If the car had been stolen from his lot cause someone broke in and took it, a different law applies but the law where “if not for his actions” the car would got damaged would apply here. Now if nothing happens to the car then all is good but, if something should happen then the person who moved it would be liable. And a different law applies if the man moved it, nothing happened to the car for 30 days but on the 31st day something does. Then too bad. After 30 days the car could be seen as abandoned and then the old owner is out of luck. Why happens to an abandoned thing happens. You may not like this, there may be exceptions to it but that is something that the lawyer has to argue about in court - an exception to the law.
    1
  3387. 1
  3388.  @Taydooba  - that’s is not what I’m saying. This isn’t any parking spot. The car is in a small parking lot. There is a good chance one of the tenants from the building parked it there. The man/owner tried to do the right thing and let the owner know where their car was. In doing so, he assumed responsibility to do sue diligence in care. In other words have it towed by a legit tow company. Unfortunately a legit one will not touch it. Had he just had it removed from the spot he would have been fine. It’s the letter that is the problem. Seattle has a pesky law that says a car cannot be towed from a business, lot or the street without a ticket. The cops refuse to issue one. All because he did not have tow signs up to warn a person that unauthorized parking in his lot would result in towing. Welcome to the world of doing business. Had it been a parked in a private residence, his personal driveway, no one else allowed, there wouldn’t have been a problem. This however is not that. It is a business as such other laws apply. Businesses have to have signs posted about towing. Private residence does not. Have you ever been to a store that didn’t have signs up? This includes apartments. This is why. What people fail to understand though is the letter and the lack of action to retrieve the vehicle now works in the man’s favor. 30 days after the owners were notified, if they do not remove the vehicle, the man can contact the state to have the title changed into his name. The car can be considered abandoned. The city then sends a letter as well and if no action is taken by the end of that 30 days they will issue a new clean title to the man. He gets a car for free or for the cost of filing. If the company responses, they are told they have 3 days to remove it or lose it. If they do not then again the man gets a new car. So after 60 days that car can belong to him and if the old owners then come to take it he can have them arrested for cat theft. That means he can sell it, tow it, scrap it, give it away if he wants, it’s his car. So you see, the letter is important. It shows he did his part, the ride share did not.
    1
  3389. 1
  3390. 1
  3391. 1
  3392. 1
  3393. 1
  3394. 1
  3395. My Nephews sued me on a probate of my Mom. They complained that as her Grandkids they had more right to her home then me as her daughter and her saying so in the Will that it was Mine 85% of the sale was Mine if I sold the home, then the money is divided .... if sold, only then they got fair market value at the time of her death, me - got the remainder. They wanted to be the executor of her Will, I was and said Okay. I did not live in the state and this did made things easier or, so I thought. They then sued me cause I would not sell the house to them for 29 thousand dollars a house worth 300 thousand. They got an attorney, turned out it was a real estate lawyer. They tried to sue the probate. They wanted to take it to court, my lawyer said okay, then said they wanted arbitration, me- okay, them no trial, me- okay, them now we want just a Judge to rule, me - okay, them no now we want the arbitration, me- okay. It got so bad my lawyer had to contact a judge To rule Arbitration. Then the real estate lawyer wanted to sue my lawyer for dragging it out that got as far as the deposition, lasted 3 hours when the arbitrator said enough. Went to the court with all the BS where the court ruled your ready For trial then - which they said no, court said yes. Then came the one day arbitration which will be the last- case will be settled. The Real Estate lawyer showed up with her client my nephew, with just her coat in hand. No note pad, no pen, no evidence (which they said they had that proved, I as the old executor stole from the estate over half a million dollars. They came with nothing. The Arbitrator found in my favor, saying that everything was left to me so I didn’t steal anything as well as there was no money just the house and it is to be sold. In the end it was, all so they could get their share of the house, 5 thousand dollars which they were not suppose to get until the sale of the house per the Will, if I decided to sell. My point, the lawyer they have does not sound like a lawyer that understand contract law or criminal law. They may also be just a para legal that has delusions of grandeur. Thinks they can add Esquire to the end of their name and as such can call themselves a Lawyer or a Divorce, Bankruptcy Lawyer. All Lawyers have access to a database that has the name of lawyers and who they work for with the address of their office so they know where they can send the legal papers to. This person does not so again does not sound like a lawyer. As you said every lawyer knows about the limitations you have on time that you can file. This is way past that time. There are exceptions such as new discovery but this is not that kind of case. Also you can’t sue the lawyer cause they had a better argument. I would look into if the guy is going through a divorce. The Lawyer looks to be trying to recover property that was jointly owned and the other party thinks they can recover some money by suing everyone involved. My other guess would be he had a partner and the business is bankrupt so the partner is looking to recover. Dealing with a bankruptcy Lawyer.
    1
  3396. 1
  3397. 1
  3398. 1
  3399. 1
  3400. 1
  3401. 1
  3402. 1
  3403. 1
  3404. 1
  3405. 1
  3406. 1
  3407. 1
  3408. 1
  3409. 1
  3410. 1
  3411. 1
  3412. 1
  3413. 1
  3414. 1
  3415. 1
  3416. 1
  3417. 1
  3418. 1
  3419. 1
  3420. 1
  3421. 1
  3422. 1
  3423. 1
  3424. 1
  3425. 1
  3426. 1
  3427. 1
  3428. 1
  3429. 1
  3430. 1
  3431. 1
  3432. 1
  3433. 1
  3434. 1
  3435. 1
  3436. Keep watching the states. People are leaving California for Texas. They are moving to places that have no water. Sound familiar to what they did in the 89’s and 90’s to Washington State. Where they moved and promptly sued the state for not building home for them where they wanted to live. This resulted in many land slides and eco systems lost. This also resulted in homes that were being built to stop being built because the homes had no water due to the increase in the cities such as Seattle. This resulted in the state of California suing the state of Washington for that excess water. The water that was suppose to go to the homes that are no longer being built because there is no longer water available, only to force the builder to build the homes without water hook ups. The Way it was worded though, the state of Washington lost the suit and had to send water they didn’t have to California cause for the first time a drought in that state. Then to sue and get the water out from the Columbia river, then from Lake Mead in Nevada. All now are so low on water. Now these same people are moving to Texas in the areas that have no water. It’s going to happen again, they are going to change Texas law to get what they want at the expense of the people who did the right thing and live in areas that have water. All the time these same transplants will be spewing conservation! Keep in mind California is the way it is because that’s what the people voted for. They move to Texas for more freedoms is a joke. In the mean time the Governor of Texas is bussing up to places like New York and D.C. migrants from South America. These people were traveling through the areas the people of California want. Coincidence?
    1
  3437. 1
  3438. 1
  3439. 1
  3440. 1
  3441. 1
  3442. 1
  3443. 1
  3444. 1
  3445. 1
  3446. When we moved into our first home, the realtor said we were in an HOA. We were not given any information on the HOA till closing. My husband just ticked off the box. I read it. 3 lines that said nothing about who it is, how much the fees were. I didn’t sign the box and I started asking questions about it. This home was coming from the builder and it was a new sub division. The builder was there and answered my questions. Most were “I’m not sure at this time, I will send you the information.” I didn’t want to go forward but my husband got mad, telling me I was holding everything up and to just sign. The lawyer for the seller, who records all the paperwork spoke up. She said , I was asking good questions, the seller (builder) is required to answer them and he hasn’t. By law we can still sign for the house and if she (me) doesn’t get the answer within 6 weeks, you (my husband and I) can ignore the HOA and the builder would then be responsible for paying our dues. My Husband all smiles now let me keep asking questions about anything I wanted. The builder was nervous and got me the information, fixed all the defects within 3 weeks. The other home owners were jealous. Then when it came time for yearly dues, we paid up and the HOA sent us a notice telling us to pay. I called the number and found it to be a law office on the other side of the state. Asked why the letter cause I had the canceled check. That’s when a lot of back peddling started. The person checked the books and saw that we had paid but that a few people around us had not. She said they could not spot send letters (send them only to the people who have not paid) so they sent them out to everyone on the block. That way no one knows who didn’t pay. I said that’s B.S.! Lawyers send out letters all the time to individuals. You don’t send an eviction notice to everyone in an apartment building, you send it to the one person who is not paying rent. I guess they didn’t like me calling them out cause the next thing I knew I was getting warning for everything. Trash cans not in my garage (no one else had Then there), for not parking in my garage (nothing said I had to park my car in my garage. It just said no overnight parking on the street. I got a photo of my trash can in front of my open garage door and a warning to put it in the garage again. In the photo you can see that it is open and I am on the side of the garage cleaning up leaves and stuff for the trash. No fines were ever given. We left the HOA, home after 18 months. We only live in Non-HOA areas now. It’s getting harder and harder to find an area without them.
    1
  3447. 1
  3448. 1
  3449. 1
  3450. 1
  3451. 1
  3452. 1
  3453. 1
  3454. 1
  3455. 1
  3456. 1
  3457. 1
  3458. 1
  3459. 1
  3460. 1
  3461. 1
  3462. 1
  3463. 1
  3464. 1
  3465. 1
  3466. 1
  3467. 1
  3468. 1
  3469. 1
  3470. 1
  3471. 1
  3472. 1
  3473. 1
  3474. 1
  3475. 1
  3476. 1
  3477. 1
  3478. 1
  3479. 1
  3480. 1
  3481. 1
  3482. 1
  3483. 1
  3484. 1
  3485. 1
  3486. 1
  3487. 1
  3488. 1
  3489. 1
  3490. 1
  3491. 1
  3492. 1
  3493. 1
  3494. 1
  3495. 1
  3496. 1
  3497. 1
  3498. 1
  3499. 1
  3500. 1
  3501. 1
  3502. 1
  3503. 1
  3504. 1
  3505. 1
  3506. 1
  3507. 1
  3508. 1
  3509. 1
  3510. 1
  3511. 1
  3512. 1
  3513. 1
  3514. 1
  3515. 1
  3516. 1
  3517. This women is guilty, she did feel like she was entitled. She didn’t do it cause she was white (I hear what your saying too - because she is white she doesn’t know that she has been given privileges most people are not given - not her fault so she doesn’t understand) That gun made her think she was above or equal to the law. She should be charged with murder 1. That gun in her purse or wherever she took it out, she was behind the man, following him, she had the advantage even without the gun. She got out after he stopped and had the gun she intended to use it. That to me says premeditated. Why else pull the gun? He had showed no violence, he did not show a weapon and did what anyone would do and grabbed the weapon to get it away from someone pointing it at them to save their life. But - that may not be the argument used at her trial. Which is why the law professor on your panel said this may be a difficult case to try. The case may involve the - is a person a felon if fleeing an accident? Does a citizen have the right to follow, confront a fleeing felon? The murder part may be the 5th or 6th charge. You cannot convict if anyone of the charges before that charge of murder is found to be a citizens right. Zimmerman got away with it cause the right to stand your ground was not ruled unlawful. The murder then is justified cause the murder charge was not allowed. They could not move to the other charges as unlawful. I hope that made sense. Yes the trial happened and the arguments heard cause the voting does not happen till afterwards. What the guilty verdicts do, do is make it easier to then charge her with civil cases and destroy her that way.
    1
  3518. 1
  3519. 1
  3520. 1
  3521. 1
  3522. 1
  3523. 1
  3524. 1
  3525. 1
  3526. 1
  3527. 1
  3528. 1
  3529. 1
  3530. 1
  3531. 1
  3532. 1
  3533. 1
  3534. 1
  3535. 1
  3536. 1
  3537. 1
  3538. 1
  3539. 1
  3540. 1
  3541. 1
  3542. 1
  3543. 1
  3544. 1
  3545. 1
  3546. 1
  3547. 1
  3548. 1
  3549. 1
  3550. 1
  3551. 1
  3552. 1
  3553. 1
  3554. 1
  3555. 1
  3556. 1
  3557. 1
  3558. 1
  3559. 1
  3560. 1
  3561. 1
  3562. 1
  3563. 1
  3564. 1
  3565. 1
  3566. 1
  3567. 1
  3568. 1
  3569. 1
  3570. 1
  3571. 1
  3572. 1
  3573. 1
  3574. 1
  3575. 1
  3576. 1
  3577. 1
  3578. 1
  3579. 1
  3580. 1
  3581. 1
  3582. 1
  3583. 1
  3584. 1
  3585. 1
  3586. 1
  3587. 1
  3588. 1
  3589. 1
  3590. 1
  3591. 1
  3592. 1
  3593. 1
  3594. 1
  3595. 1
  3596. 1
  3597. 1
  3598. 1
  3599. 1
  3600. 1
  3601. 1
  3602. 1
  3603. 1
  3604. 1
  3605. 1
  3606. 1
  3607. 1
  3608. 1
  3609. 1
  3610. 1
  3611. 1
  3612. 1
  3613. 1
  3614. 1
  3615. 1
  3616. 1
  3617. 1
  3618. 1
  3619. 1
  3620. 1
  3621. 1
  3622. 1
  3623. 1
  3624. 1
  3625. 1
  3626. 1
  3627. 1
  3628. 1
  3629. 1
  3630. 1
  3631. 1
  3632. 1
  3633. 1
  3634. 1
  3635. 1
  3636. 1
  3637. 1
  3638. 1
  3639. 1
  3640. 1
  3641. 1
  3642. 1
  3643. 1
  3644. 1
  3645. 1
  3646.  @robertschreckenbach596  - he had NOT!!!! Been convicted of a crime yet! Bond is not parole. If he had been convicted your bond ends and you are given jail time. Taken into custody right then and there or told when to come back to start your time. Your Bond is still done though. So for him to be out on bond for another crime means he has not been to court yet. He has not been convicted. He has no record of conviction. As such the judge can condemn him for something he had not been convicted of. Don’t get me wrong, the man is guilty of the second crime. Too many witnesses, video evidence. However, he has not been to court yet. The courts can’t look ahead and predetermine the outcome and say - Sorry, no bond for you based on the evidence and prior bonds for another crime. He has not been found guilty of anything yet so, the judge can’t say she is withholding bail based on them. The Judge also needs a good reason Not to give bond such as based on his record from past crimes, I can see he seems to be a violent offender so I am denying bond. Or because the women is in the hospital and is not likely to survive, the charges met be changed and I believe him to be a flight risk so no bond. None of that happened. He attacked a female from behind, no weapon used. He then pins her to the ground to sexually assault her but is stopped before and bodily damage was done. Both crimes are considered petty. Attempted rape is not the same as rape. Different factors to prove. He has no history of it (meaning no other convictions) the judge has no good reason to deny bail. It is unfair but he has the right to a trial. The courts are backed up. He can go to jail for that time and the state can spent thousands of dollars defending the right to no bail. He then is convicted but under the law, he has already served his time so he would be allowed to go free. Had he beat her so bad she had to go to the hospital - different charges. Had he used a weapon - different charges. Then it would be worth the time, money and effort to fight his right to bail.
    1
  3647. 1
  3648. 1
  3649. 1
  3650. 1
  3651. 1
  3652. If these same people studied history they would have seen our founding fathers all for sealing off a city so the plague does not spread. Going so far as to kill anyone trying to leave a city that is plagued infested so they don’t catch it. Cause they knew even back then that a person can look healthy but become sick later on, spreading the disease. These same founding fathers also would not have agreed to taxes going to pay for public schooling. Not everyone deserved an education. The same people also made it clear that only land owners could vote. How many of these people rent? If they rent they have no say by those same documents she held up. Time changed them. These are times that people need to change in. To protect others. Wear the mask when out in public. Don’t when you are home. I got one have notice when I wear my mask, I do not have as many allergy attacks as I use to have. My attacks are not sneezing. They are life crippling. So dizzy I can’t stand, so dizzy laying still is hard. The slightest movement and I want to throw up. So the masks not only protect me from other peoples germs but from pollen as well. I live where the temperature is normally 100+ degrees in summer and 80+ in winter. I have no problems breathing through my mask. Breathing in hot air is hard with it without a mask. So far no one has dropped dead cause of it. There is enough oxygen getting through that I am not breath just carbon dioxide. As for them being Lions instead of sheep - please, they got their information from an unknown person on the Internet who feels the same way as them. They use their words instead of their own. Sounds like sheep to me. Following blindly this unknown person who can write well. People who debate well usually win the argument. It still doesn’t make them right. Just got at talking.
    1
  3653. 1
  3654. 1
  3655. 1
  3656. 1
  3657. 1
  3658. 1
  3659. 1
  3660. 1
  3661. 1
  3662. 1
  3663. 1
  3664. 1
  3665. 1
  3666. 1
  3667. 1
  3668. 1
  3669. 1
  3670. 1
  3671. 1
  3672. 1
  3673. 1
  3674. 1
  3675. 1
  3676. 1
  3677. 1
  3678. 1
  3679. 1
  3680. 1
  3681. 1
  3682. 1
  3683. 1
  3684. 1
  3685. 1
  3686. 1
  3687. 1
  3688. 1
  3689. 1
  3690. 1
  3691. 1
  3692. 1
  3693. 1
  3694. 1
  3695. 1
  3696. 1
  3697. 1
  3698. 1
  3699. 1
  3700. 1
  3701. 1
  3702. 1
  3703. 1
  3704. 1
  3705. 1
  3706. 1
  3707. 1
  3708. 1
  3709. 1
  3710. 1
  3711. 1
  3712. 1
  3713. 1
  3714. 1
  3715. 1
  3716. 1
  3717. 1
  3718. 1
  3719. 1
  3720. 1
  3721. 1
  3722. 1
  3723. 1
  3724. 1
  3725. 1
  3726. 1
  3727. 1
  3728. 1
  3729. 1
  3730. 1
  3731. 1
  3732. 1
  3733. 1
  3734. 1
  3735. 1
  3736. 1
  3737. 1
  3738. 1
  3739. 1
  3740. 1
  3741. 1
  3742. 1
  3743. 1
  3744. 1
  3745. 1
  3746. 1
  3747. 1
  3748. 1
  3749. 1
  3750. 1
  3751. 1
  3752. 1
  3753. 1
  3754. 1
  3755. 1
  3756. 1
  3757. 1
  3758. 1
  3759. 1
  3760. 1
  3761. 1
  3762. 1
  3763. 1
  3764. 1
  3765. 1
  3766. 1
  3767. 1
  3768. 1
  3769. 1
  3770. 1
  3771. 1
  3772. 1
  3773. 1
  3774. 1
  3775. 1
  3776. 1
  3777. 1
  3778. 1
  3779. 1
  3780. 1
  3781. 1
  3782. 1
  3783. 1
  3784. 1
  3785. 1
  3786. 1
  3787. 1
  3788. 1
  3789. 1
  3790. 1
  3791. 1
  3792. 1
  3793. 1
  3794. 1
  3795. 1
  3796. 1
  3797. 1
  3798. 1
  3799. 1
  3800. 1
  3801. 1
  3802. 1
  3803. 1
  3804. 1
  3805. 1
  3806. doug112244 - this is all good to know for future homes. I did not ask in the home I have now but I did read the mortgage paperwork. I read the stuff I have to sign as well as things that cost me a lot of money. None of that paperwork mentions it. I will have to ask my neighbors if they have anything going through their yards. If they do then chances of me are probably good as well. Now I know that my electric, water and sewage goes through my yard and those are utilities but they are also part of the house. Cable goes under the grass from the front of the house. The main box goes under the city sidewalk. Then a line goes under the yard for each individual home. That is not an easement cause they ask permission to put that one cable down for our home. But if they wanted to put down new fiber optic cable for everyone they cannot use our yard to lay the cable. We had another home new housing area and they had the same system, under the sidewalk. The electric company has their lines behind the homes with a separate strip of land that is not part of our property. That is what I see a lot. Keeping utility’s separate from peoples homes so they can have access to it anytime. That’s why I have a hard time with this video, are they taking the land to lay new lines and through her property is the easiest way to go? That’s what it seems like when I see her pipes exposed and no cable lines. That’s why I think they are trespassing. They are doing what’s easiest for them and to hell with who is in the way. Just because they will make it look nice afterwards it’s not agreement. They broke into her yard, dug it up to lay new cable. They were not taking out old cable and replacing it.
    1
  3807. doug112244 - I know about San Antonio. What a weird place. Family lives there but in older homes before 1980, before cable. The newer homes have that gap between homes which I figured for utilities as such not part of the homes property. I guess it boils down to is, how old is her home? Before 1980 and cable companies buried their lines, Or newer? I have to say I just assumed because of her age she had an older home. I still think if there is an easement even for utilities it should be mentioned on the sellers paperwork or you as the buyer do not have to agree to it since the agreement for the easement was between the old owner (even the builder) and the utilities/cable and not the new owner. In Washington state there is a law that says you do not have to pay a collection agency if they bought the outstanding debt. You are still responsible to, let’s say a hospital, to pay that business. Unless in your paperwork it says that they may sell your debt and you will be contacted by them. But if that is not in the paperwork you signed you don’t have to pay them and the hospital has wiped your debt cause they sold it so they will tell you your good to go. That is why mortgage companies put that little disclaimer in their contracts.most people are none the wiser cause they sell the escrow accounts that you as the home owner pay into. But that’s in your contract, so an easement not in your contract is a problem if the utility company comes knocking. I say you can refuse them access because you don’t have an agreement with them. As such they would have to take me to court to regain access/their easement.
    1
  3808. doug112244 - I knew about the debt. It’s like that nation wide I think, 7 years. What I was saying though if it was not in the original contract you sign with the original debtors, like a hospital being the most likely place you would accumulates high debt and sign paperwork saying you you will make payments to settle it. Then after a few payments you stop. They try to collect, can’t, sell the debt before the 7 years, a collection agency then tries to collect, you don’t have to pay cause the original agreement was with the hospital. 2 exceptions 1) you make a payment to them, that means you accept them now as the debtor or 2) you don’t make it cause they are not who you have the promissory note with. Unless in the original paperwork it says they can sell the debt, like what’s in most mortgage companies. But if you do not even pay anyone after 7 years of last payment the debt is wiped. But if you make a payment at 6years 11 months 30 days, then the 7 years starts all over again. For that reason I read my contracts. I also know about easements and I look for that in the contracts, I asked about it with my realtor before we signed and was told that it was not in the paperwork from the deed search. I was given 3 pages from the deed search, a copy of my property lines, title information, and a section of work done on the property. That is where I figured any easement would be at and I didn’t see anything. The home I’m at now was before 1980, my old home was built I. 2010. Neither mentioned utilities having laid their lines through my property. They didn’t mention lines running to my home only for me. I asked and was told any lines on my property have to be worked out between you and the utility companies with the exception of water, sewer and electricity. Because they are city owned. They still have to ask your permission to come onto the property to work on their equipment and you can refuse them. However since it only runs to your home it is only you that will be effected as you can see on your deed search. So this women was not home and they still entered her property, broke the fence. Started digging to lay new cable without her permission. I did not see existing cable line, I saw her pipes to her home. Meaning they did not have a line already there but wanted to run a new cable under ground, through her property like she didn’t have a choice. I am saying that is wrong. They can’t claim an easement because there was none. The cable company cannot say well we held townhall meetings about it and you didn’t speak up then so you have no right now. That’s why their is real estate law. It says that you as the home owner must sign an agreement, a contract for the easement to happen. If you refuse then the courts will hear your case and decide, again in the end if yes, you still have to sign the court documents making it a contract. Then it will be placed on file in your property, deed , paperwork for future owners to find out. This cable company did not do this and just took it. It has nothing to do with mineral rights, which is a more scary law.
    1
  3809. 1
  3810. doug112244 - okay soo then why was this underground? The company just wanted to do it so they did. They entered her property without her permission. They damaged it and all they say about it we left a flyer. People excuse it because they think they have to. All they have to do is let a contractor come in when they are not home is something that is a danger or a public health issue. Let’s say a natural gas line was leaking. You smell it and report it. The tech discovers it is coming from your neighbors yard. The company will knock but if not home will enter your yard to fix the problem. Usually a temporary fix until they can talk to the home owner about how they will be coming in to the property and digging it up. They do their best to get you to say okay. This company /contractor didn’t even do that. To lay down fiber optics that they did not have in the ground already. So they just took it. Essentially forcing an easement without going to court. People just think they have to let them, reality, they don’t. You can force the company to lay the cable around the block, Along the sidewalk like all the other utilities. It’s not like her house was on the corner and built her fence right up-to the side walk. You can see her neighbor next door. This company was going through yards instead of around them to save money, more money for them to pocket from the company that contracted out to them. I would see a lawyer to make them dig it out and do it the way they were contracted to, again making them redo my yard back to its original clean/good look.
    1
  3811. 1
  3812. 1
  3813. 1
  3814. 1
  3815. 1
  3816. 1
  3817. 1
  3818. 1
  3819. 1
  3820. 1
  3821. 1
  3822. 1
  3823. 1
  3824. 1
  3825. 1
  3826. 1
  3827. 1
  3828. 1
  3829. 1
  3830. 1
  3831. 1
  3832. 1
  3833. 1
  3834. 1
  3835. 1
  3836. 1
  3837. 1
  3838. 1
  3839. 1
  3840. 1
  3841. 1
  3842. 1
  3843. 1
  3844. 1
  3845. 1
  3846. 1
  3847. 1
  3848. 1
  3849. I watched a news interview with the owner of the trees. He said he thinks it was for the view but, he was not sure. He was in his home and heard the chain saws and didn’t think much of it. It’s an area where builders are building homes. However the noise got louder and he looks out his window and sees the huge scar/gap in the land and ran out to the crew to stop them. The owner said they looked confuse as they thought it was the other man’s trees. They did think it strange though that the line went straight to the owner property. Again though, he didn’t think much of it and did what he was hired to do. The tree owner said it was going to cost 1.5 million to replant the trees from saplings as there were no trees large enough to just replace them. This will include clearing the land, getting rid of stumps and shrubs. Then planting the saplings and the care of them over the years. He did say the only good thing is that tree grows fast and believes in 10 years they will have filled in to what he lost. The tree owner said he wasn’t sure if he was going to sue the tree removers or not, he wanted to talk to his lawyer first. I’m thinking his lawyer will advise him to sue them as they are a party to the crimes. Charges so far are trespassing and theft or criminal damage to property. The person who allegedly ordered the trees removed has refused to talk to anyone except their lawyer and he is not granting interviews. What got me is he had to have known the trees were not his property. Mostly because he had a house built on his property so he know the property lines. Did he think the rest of the properties around him were government land? One where you don’t ask permission but forgiveness? Government then lets him keep it since the damage is done. Or is it a land grab. Did he think that by cutting the trees down he is improving the property and thus claims the land as his own. Cause he thought no one but the county owned it? The path that they took to cut the trees down is well hidden from the road. No one would know and he would get free land (in his head). It will be interesting. I hope you do a follow up Steve, as it goes through the courts.
    1
  3850. 1
  3851. 1
  3852. 1
  3853. 1
  3854. 1
  3855. 1
  3856. 1
  3857. 1
  3858. 1
  3859. 1
  3860. The problem is he took nuclear power documents, he knew they were too secret. Then lied about having them when asked by the federal agency to give them back. They were needed for the new President. Then when the FBI came asking the first time or two again he was told no or I don’t have them. Despite them showing he was the last person to have them. He then changes his tune when he realizes there is a paper trail that leads to him. The Feds raid his room at Mar-la-go find the documents and much more and have to get another search warrant for those things as well. That’s when he used the I’m the deciding person on what is too secret and what is not! Those are declassified! Never mind that he doesn’t realize that the new President can reclassify them as Top Secret. Then to find out that there really is a procedure in place to declassify things and he didn’t follow them. Then claimed they were part of his personal papers. Which they were not because he didn’t write them, they were written up by former presidents. Imagine if FDR said that he had the rights to the Atom Bomb because it happened on his watch. He could declassify the information and then sell it. After all it all came about under a federal program under my watch! Then he Dies and Truman claims it. Trump let a lot of people see the nuclear documents. There are Actors that told the press that he showed them. We do not know all the people who saw them or their backgrounds. He did host foreign dignitaries there both Friend and Foe. Anyway, Yes other people do take too secret documents. When asked they give them back though. Pence is a little different in that he may have asked his boss if he could have them and was told yes. That’s like an owner wanting to have an employee arrested for shoplifting even though they asked their supervisor for permission to take it. The other thing is when asked he complied right away. Trump is the only one who has done what he did. Lied about what he had. Sorry but the rules apply to everyone. The rules were put in place to prevent just this thing from happening in the first place.
    1
  3861. 1
  3862. 1
  3863. 1
  3864. 1
  3865. 1
  3866. 1
  3867. 1
  3868. 1
  3869. 1
  3870. 1
  3871. 1
  3872. 1
  3873. 1
  3874. 1
  3875. 1
  3876. 1
  3877. 1
  3878. 1
  3879. 1
  3880. 1
  3881. 1
  3882. 1
  3883. 1
  3884. 1
  3885. 1
  3886. 1
  3887. 1
  3888. 1
  3889. 1
  3890. 1
  3891. 1
  3892. 1
  3893. 1
  3894. 1
  3895. 1
  3896. 1
  3897. 1
  3898. 1
  3899. 1
  3900. 1
  3901. 1
  3902. 1
  3903. 1
  3904. 1
  3905. 1
  3906. 1
  3907. 1
  3908. 1
  3909. 1
  3910. 1
  3911. 1
  3912. 1
  3913. 1
  3914. 1
  3915. 1
  3916. 1
  3917. 1
  3918. 1
  3919. 1
  3920. 1
  3921. 1
  3922. 1
  3923. 1
  3924. 1
  3925. 1
  3926. 1
  3927. 1
  3928. 1
  3929. 1
  3930. 1
  3931. 1
  3932. 1
  3933. 1
  3934. 1
  3935. 1
  3936. 1
  3937. 1
  3938. 1
  3939. 1
  3940. 1
  3941. 1
  3942. 1
  3943. 1
  3944. 1
  3945. 1
  3946. 1
  3947. In other words, the reason why the mask study shows it didn’t work was because people were still getting infected. Who was getting infected and spreading the virus? People who didn’t were masks. I person could infect dozens of people. When you go to war, they don’t teach people to kill everyone. They teach you to hit the enemy. For every 1 person hit who doesn’t sue, it takes 2 to carry them off the battlefield. That’s 3 people out of the fight. For every one person who spreads the virus, there are 3 more infected before they know it. All because at the moment the infected person came by they had their mask down. People would answer their doors at home without a mask on. Like the virus is a vampire and needed to be invited in. All it takes is for one person to get it and spread it to everyone in the family. Then it depends on a person’s immune system. A good one will fight it off and a bad one will get them sick. How sick? That depends on the person. People seem to think that because they didn’t die then it’s not a big deal. Yet the people who were in the hospital all said it was. They were healthy till exposed. When they got sick family masked up and didn’t get it. Masks work but only if people wear them consistently. When out in public, When a someone who doesn’t live with them comes over. People had the same response that teenagers have when it comes to sex. Oh you can’t get pregnant the first time you do it. You can’t get an STD the first time. Then they find out the hard truth. It’s the same with wearing masks. One time without wearing it, could be the time you get exposed.
    1
  3948. 1
  3949. 1
  3950. 1
  3951. 1
  3952. 1
  3953. 1
  3954. 1
  3955. 1
  3956. 1
  3957. 1
  3958. 1
  3959. 1
  3960. 1
  3961. 1
  3962. 1
  3963. 1
  3964. 1
  3965. 1
  3966. 1
  3967. 1
  3968. 1
  3969. 1
  3970. 1
  3971. 1
  3972. 1
  3973. 1
  3974. 1
  3975. 1
  3976. 1
  3977. 1
  3978. 1
  3979. 1
  3980. 1
  3981. 1
  3982. 1
  3983. 1
  3984. 1
  3985. 1
  3986. 1
  3987. 1
  3988. 1
  3989. 1
  3990. 1
  3991. What gets me is that everyone thinks the federal government is suppose to protect them. It’s not. Your state is suppose to provide the guidance. Yet people think the federal government is to blame. Having said that Trump as this countries leader is not helping the states by supporting their decisions. Saying stuff like we should be back to work by Easter and that it’s okay to go out by going out himself instead of self quarantining like other world leaders. Except England’s PM. As such the people are getting mixed messages. If our State says to stay home then we see the president going around from meeting to meeting instead of doing them over the phone how are people not to think it’s okay for them to do so? It was that mind set that people flocked to the Gyms. Gyms didn’t think they needed to close, they considered themselves essential cause they provided a place for people to go and keep busy. They trusted their members to follow the rules in wiping down the equipment used and to stay 6 feet away from each other. Dispute the machines being 2 feet apart, people coughing, all the equipment/machines are being used and why wipe when there is suppose to be house keeping to do that? Like there are people who just have 3 machines each and so they can keep up with when a person comes and gets off in the gym that is full and have people waiting to use who are right nest to each other and don’t care if it’s been wiped down, that’s not their job. My area in TX had to make a special mandate that specifically said they had to close, they were not essential and people did not need them to keep from being bored. The point of the quarantine, to stay at home away from people not to give people time to get fit.
    1
  3992. 1
  3993. 1
  3994. 1
  3995. 1
  3996. 1
  3997. 1
  3998. 1
  3999. 1
  4000. 1
  4001. 1
  4002. 1
  4003. 1
  4004. 1
  4005. 1
  4006. 1
  4007. 1
  4008. 1
  4009. 1
  4010. 1
  4011. The cops had a way of handling stuff like this when they got no support from the city/ governor- the Blue Flu. It only took a few hours before the public realized there were no cops on the street and chaos happened. It took a few days to get everything back under control and once the cops did, they cracked down. Criminals either fled or were arrested and NY city had gotten better. Clearly this DA is sympathetic to the migrants. In their country they were beaten by the police and military for no reason so they fled. No, my experience is that the cops had a reason, it’s just that they (the migrant) didn’t like it. The cops beat them to rob them- well that’s a reason. If they stayed and fought like they did here with these cops, maybe they could have made their home better. Instead they flee to the U.S., and beat the cops and get away with it. All that is teaching them is that it’s okay to attack the law. They are rebels and people will praise them for it. Today’s mind set has allowed the criminals to take over, to be hero worshiped. Just like walking around with no belt and your pants fall down. That was a style that people who were in jail/prison adopted because they were not allowed belts in jail/prison. Do not let your kids adopt these styles. This is the result - hating the police and government officials thinking if they let people out of jail they will become model citizens because somehow they were scared straight. What a joke. All it taught them was that nothing happens to them. It will escalate. You want it to stop, crack down on it. The bad guys will be in jail or flee. Order will be restored. People will fall in line. Disney does this and people flee to Disney. They like feeling safe.
    1
  4012. 1
  4013. 1
  4014. 1
  4015. 1
  4016. 1
  4017. 1
  4018. 1
  4019. 1
  4020. 1
  4021. 1
  4022. 1
  4023. 1
  4024. 1
  4025. 1
  4026. 1
  4027. 1
  4028. 1
  4029. 1
  4030. 1
  4031. 1
  4032. 1
  4033. 1
  4034. 1
  4035. 1
  4036. 1
  4037. 1
  4038. 1
  4039. 1
  4040. 1
  4041. 1
  4042. 1
  4043. 1
  4044. 1
  4045. 1
  4046. 1
  4047. 1
  4048. 1
  4049. 1
  4050. 1
  4051. 1
  4052. 1
  4053. 1
  4054. 1
  4055. 1
  4056. 1
  4057. 1
  4058. 1
  4059. 1
  4060. 1
  4061. 1
  4062. 1
  4063. 1
  4064. 1
  4065. 1
  4066. 1
  4067. 1
  4068. 1
  4069. 1
  4070. 1
  4071. 1
  4072. 1
  4073. 1
  4074. 1
  4075. 1
  4076. 1
  4077. 1
  4078. 1
  4079. 1
  4080. 1
  4081. 1
  4082. 1
  4083. 1
  4084. 1
  4085. 1
  4086. 1
  4087. 1
  4088. 1
  4089. 1
  4090. 1
  4091. 1
  4092. 1
  4093. 1
  4094. 1
  4095. 1
  4096. 1
  4097. 1
  4098. 1
  4099. 1
  4100. 1
  4101. 1
  4102. 1
  4103. 1
  4104. 1
  4105. 1
  4106. 1
  4107. 1
  4108. 1
  4109. 1
  4110. 1
  4111. 1
  4112. 1
  4113. 1
  4114. 1
  4115. 1
  4116. 1
  4117. 1
  4118. 1
  4119. 1
  4120. 1
  4121. 1
  4122. 1
  4123. 1
  4124. 1
  4125. 1
  4126. 1
  4127. 1
  4128. 1
  4129. 1
  4130. 1
  4131. 1
  4132. 1
  4133. 1
  4134. 1
  4135. 1
  4136. 1
  4137. 1
  4138. 1
  4139. 1
  4140. 1
  4141. 1
  4142. 1
  4143. 1
  4144. 1
  4145. 1
  4146. 1
  4147. 1
  4148. 1
  4149. 1
  4150. 1
  4151. 1
  4152. 1
  4153. 1
  4154. 1
  4155. 1
  4156. 1
  4157. 1
  4158. 1
  4159. 1
  4160. 1
  4161. 1
  4162. 1
  4163. 1
  4164. 1
  4165. 1
  4166. 1
  4167. 1
  4168. 1
  4169. 1
  4170. 1
  4171. 1
  4172. 1
  4173. 1
  4174. 1
  4175. 1
  4176. 1
  4177. 1
  4178. 1
  4179. 1
  4180. 1
  4181. 1
  4182. 1
  4183. 1
  4184. 1
  4185. 1
  4186. 1
  4187. 1
  4188. 1
  4189. 1
  4190. 1
  4191. 1
  4192. 1
  4193. 1
  4194. 1
  4195. 1
  4196. 1
  4197. 1
  4198. 1
  4199. 1
  4200. 1
  4201. 1
  4202. 1
  4203. 1
  4204. 1
  4205. 1
  4206. 1
  4207. 1
  4208. 1
  4209. 1
  4210. 1
  4211. 1
  4212. 1
  4213. 1
  4214. 1
  4215. 1