Comments by "Maria F." (@mariaf.6601) on "Nord Stream sabotage and hybrid war on Europe" video.

  1.  @Pnumi  Are you saying that CIA that was in 1963 anti communist, in 1972 wasn't that much ? 🤔
    5
  2. No argument ?
    4
  3.  @xfxox  Oh, it must be the fictional mass media desinformation in the exchange office , (despite I don't use English much?) let's teach them a lesson - I'll buy from you rubles at 66 rubles/ 1 euro, then I'll sell them at 83 How much can you get at your rate ?
    4
  4.  @xfxox  Take care , No offence.
    4
  5.  @Pnumi  Thank you for your reply. So if they influenced foreign policy - how CIA made the course less anti communist in the 1970s ? ('the thaw')
    4
  6.  @Pnumi  My question is how do you explain CIA was anti communist in the 1960s but in 1970s not? (withdrawal from Vietnam, warming in political relations, Apollo-Soyuz common space project etc )
    4
  7. They will not, don't worry.
    4
  8. 13:08
    4
  9.  @i93sme  What currency, pls? You aren't talking about artificially maintained official exchange rate of RUBel (at great cost of selling out the reserves, actually harming the internal finance system of the state), are you? While in the market , eg in exchange offices in Turkey , rubel devalueated. * What move to Asian market (short term) do you mean?
    4
  10. You omit Russia state of mind, apart of that Russia is continuously at war, as was Soviet Union also before WW2.
    4
  11.  @xfxox  Perhaps start at adequate facts, Any UN court sentence AD 2022 ? Ruble exchange rate is much worse in the market (not the official artificially set by the authorities) eg where I live , you get EUR 12 for RUB 1000 i.e. RUB 83+ for 1 euro. Another try ?
    3
  12. Putin.
    3
  13. Why do you think so?
    3
  14.  @donlawler9510  How do you know the truth will be far from what he's considering? The man talks about indications, not accusations.
    3
  15.  @donlawler9510  Why are you saying no motive nor opportunity? The authorities 'state of mind' makes their decisions unforseeable.
    3
  16. Russia haven't removed its option: 1. One NS2 pipeline remains intact 2. There are other pipelines on land / surface (Yamal , Friendship) that could do the job, like they did before.
    3
  17. Russia's time may be running out ...
    3
  18. Well, Russia started the war which is bringing the country to ruin, so what is 25 billion more or less 😂
    3
  19. Poe's law applied.
    3
  20. Side note - It's gas pipelines, to be exact.
    3
  21. @ClownZ , what price exactly do you mean , how much $$ or €€ , pls? Where is the "x4" from ?
    3
  22.  @clownz8129  French President ? France imported 16 -17 % of gas from Russia before the war, so no big issue. As it comes to prices , it's thanks to Russia and its war they peaked in 2022.
    3
  23.  @clownz8129  Thank you 😉 False modesty apart, Mr Macron is a politician. If you could link to his original statement, we'd know where to go.
    3
  24. Equally you could write With the gas turned off , Russia doesn't suffer any consequences ...
    3
  25.  @Gezira  Perhaps you don't understand , it's not about counting who is or was at war now or before (for US it is a proxy war, no need to mobilise, Russia officially didn't declare war but mobilises desperately). My point is the state of mind.
    3
  26. Any argument for any other hypothesis?
    3
  27. 13:08
    2
  28. The Dane ?😜
    2
  29. Do you know that one pipe of NS2 was left untouched? + There are also Russian - EU gas pipes on land ?
    2
  30.  @donlawler9510  The main export source is oil, Russia gambled with "the maintenance" of the gaspipe, so ... OK , THank you for the conversation . 🤝🙂
    2
  31. Was it meant to be a German joke ? Where's the cost, mileage, timing , bitte?
    2
  32. we are *living in case you would like to edit 🙂
    2
  33. * forget :)
    2
  34. You could equally change Uncle Sam for Uncle Vova - with Baltic Fleet in Kaliningrad. (just if you have to show you're a boss, you actually aren't the boss).
    2
  35.  @Pnumi  Which do you recommend ?
    2
  36.  @Pnumi  Which media do you recommend? Which world do you live in, pls?
    2
  37.  @floodgates182  "Almost no one" = only vitally important economic actors. The payment for the fuel delivered is literally burt down in the frontlines (also the reserves elsewhere). + No, the gas not delivered to EU cannot be sold somewhere else, because it cannot be transported. This + what you can see in the front and the decisions (like the mobilisation) taken in Kremlin show a gruesome picture.
    2
  38. Never say never.
    2
  39. Hasn't Russia started the war? 🤯
    2
  40. Actually, he didn't say 'destroy'.
    2
  41. Perhaps you missed the argument at the final part of the recording, min.11:00 approximately. NS isn't the only Ru-EU gas pipeline, btw, so idk the leverage...
    2
  42. Russia actually shelled Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant under their control. They sabotaged many times their gas supplies contracts to blackmail other countries, so you never know what they can destroy ...
    2
  43.  @gustavctresselt6192  Perhaps, but no one knows whether this winter will be stormy, cold or mild, I think. So it's gambling, not planning. Similarly (although less) , the reaction of the people (to this one the authorities and the society may find answers).
    2
  44. 🙄
    2
  45. Like you could not repair the pipe or US were the only alternative for gas/ fuels supply 🙄
    2
  46. @Jim Vonn Not the same, unless you want to stretch the facts to fit a narrative. Semantics matters.
    2
  47. Is it ? BTW How Look at France and Keiser Germany in 1918
    2
  48.  @Gezira  It's not about confirmation but indication, perhaps you didn't understand and are fighting phantoms ?
    2
  49. I'll write about 'Russia - state of mind' later, (it's not about psychology)
    2
  50. Do you really believe your politicians make Russia invade other countries or act war in Chechnya, so NATO wouldn't accept it ?
    2
  51. How is the weather in Moscow, Ivan ?
    2
  52.  @johnadam2885  I'm fine, thanks, between the jobs because of illness, but watching the offers there are some. It's warm inside and outside 🙂
    2
  53.  @johnadam2885  December and January are also mild here , thanks for your interest :) Who told you I want to defeat Russia, btw ? (Algerian gas wasn't competitive) As you mention it, it looks it's Russia (decision makers) who defeat Russia most.
    2
  54. Wow, what an argument 🤣
    2
  55. Which false statements do you mean ?
    2
  56. What's the evidence ?
    1
  57.  @tribalartcollector  US isn't either I don't know if you could say that it was close in the early 1990s. Another thing is Russian thinking about themselves as a kind of empire. BTW, what's your definition of winning the war ?
    1
  58. There's one pipeline of NS2 left not damaged.
    1
  59.  @gustavctresselt6192  Absolutely not - only as long as Russia authorities had a hope to turn it on, Or they calculated that they could gain much more (or avoid bigger loss instead) There's also the question of fines for breaking the contracts.
    1
  60. No more Russia - EU pipelines ? There are some on the land eg Yamal
    1
  61. Cope, Sasha ...
    1
  62. Any arguments?
    1
  63.  @TheAngryAustrian  You can find hypothetical reasons of Russia's as any other's, in minutes 3:0 4:0 APN talks about the immediate effects that fit Russia (you mention social concern yourself). Moreover , Russia simply cutting off the supply bears the responsibility for that (excuses apart), while 'the underwater sabotage way' no one knows who is the responsible, so there are no financial fines (so far).
    1
  64. Start argument 😂
    1
  65. Commander Nielsen ? 😊
    1
  66.  @skorlupkaskorlupkovich2415  What makes you think Russia isn't losing, pls?
    1
  67.  @skorlupkaskorlupkovich2415  1. Huge means 10 % ? Remember keiser Germany in 1918 ? 2. You got me It's like why Russia sells 7% of its gold reserves in a month, if it could sell 99-100% ?
    1