General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Maria F.
Anders Puck Nielsen
comments
Comments by "Maria F." (@mariaf.6601) on "Peace talks will take a long time" video.
What are you talking about? Vladimir Vladimirovich said there'd be no war, and then there is three day special operation, check it out.
7
You probably know that Ukrainians die because of Russia's aggression, war attacks, but also on occupied territories, so the chice they make is to fight, not go to slaughter.
7
21 thousand ,858 views in the first three hours after releasing, Half past ten pm, 18th of January 2025. ๐
5
Are you saying that president Putin is a liar ? Prove it.
4
How many Ukrainians did you talk to in that time pls? Were they of different sociological groups?
4
@Marko9515 You haven't answered the question, Your intent of insult is the proof of your fail.
4
โโโโ @Princip666 Oh, the right one is @Marko9515 who cannot prove his/her claim and is deflecting, and me , who haven't claim anything to him/her ( right-wrong, not winning, not losing, not stalemate) - dishonest? Pls explain it to us all. ๐ฎ
4
@Princip666 I made no claim, Marko9515 did, and haven't answered simple questions. You intent to wag the dog, why ?
4
@Marko9515 I understand your point, I think and see it as wrong, no offence.
4
@Princip666 Marko9515, the OP wrote s/he has never seen a Ukrainian who would say they are winning, and didn't answer the questions about who'd been those "seen". That points to the assumption the statement is in theory true only as long as s/he hasn't seen any Ukrainian.
4
@Marko9515 Fantastic, but my question is about the Ukrainians you "have seen". โ
4
โ @Princip666 Fabulous you think you know what others think, but the point is @Marko9515 (cannot?) address my question about the Ukrainians s/he "has seen" /i.e. 'anybody from U./. ๐ฉ
4
What is your argumentation exactly, to support this claim pls?
3
@Shannon-ro6ju Oh, I see, you come to troll a little bit.
3
@Marko9515 Thanks for your clarification, it's a pity you didn't mention media in the first post, we would've saved some time ๐ Then I have no more questions.
3
OK, how are you going to guarantee? and verify your claim?
3
@johnadam2885 You don't work in Olgino, do you? You just make the ... stuff yourself , for entertainment ?
3
@theodorekamarinos8455 What you presented is the evidence of Russia's economy downfall: the "growth" is burning (literally) the resources at war, the lack of workforce , add financial disaster. Meantime, while European economies did slow down, it is no "collapse".
2
@RobKov6 You can get lithium from South America or Africa countries. No comment on what you wrote about oil and gas ๐๐๐
2
โ @kadovax6567 It is most probably just YouTube algorithm that mskes Anton's post vanish.
2
Pls elaborate. It looks you are talking about some comic book ?
2
โ @evgeniya7853 The Istanbul were capitulation conditions. If Russia wanted to end the war, Russian soldiers could return home (where they have a lot to do to improve).
2
29 ... 29 thousand in four hours, Eleven thirty at night of Saturday, 18. 01. 25
2
60 , 160 after twelve hours , half past seven am on Sunday 19. 01. 25.
2
Twenty hours after release, 80 thousand , 900 Sunday 18th Jan. 15.33
2
In twenty - four hours 88 thousand, At fourteen minutes to eight pm 89.
2
121 thousand at around nine o'clock in the morning of Wednesday, 22. 01. 1000 in 9 hours ... ๐ฎ
2
Tue 131 , 466 at eight minutes to three o'clock in the afternoon , on the twenty-eighth of Jan. ๐๐
2
Yesterday , almost a thousand in 24 hours, plus tweny+five minutes, Today 466 in about 15 hh, 31 views per hour (ysd 36) , which means 744 til midnight ๐?
2
Wednesday 132 ,066 st 8 am on the 29.01 131, 9..30? At midnight yesterday. Expected 30 per hour , 132 about two am, 2.30 .
2
We 132, 535 at around eleven o'clock at night, on the 29th of January ๐ A bit more than half thousand in 24 hrs.
2
566...9 at midnight and seven mins past, Wednesday into Thursday, 29/30
2
What is your argument/ation exactly here, if it is not too much to ask ?
2
What is that "hard evidence", according to you?
1
@theodorekamarinos8455 How do you read it? When the infrastructure breaks down because it isn't maintained (lack of workers, specialists) it's no good.
1
Why couldn't the camera angle change ? It did.
1
@organic3132 Have you got any warm water port there? ๐ง
1
โ @evgeniya7853 Do you write it as a profession, job, service - for money?
1
Perhaps no sanctions lifted until Russia changes its course for good.
1
@RobKov6 Which are they, sanctioned, that you couldn't buy somewhere else pls?
1
@RobKov6 It is exactly the reason countries don't want to buy "cheap" from Russia.
1
@RobKov6 Don't tell me you don't know what percentage of fuel imports it is. It is going to be even lower from now on. Shaking my head ...
1
@RobKov6 Certainly not much, just checked to make sure, there is some margin, less than 4%. If it is mixed into other providers than the producer countries, just think who profits most.
1
You imply rational approach ๐ on the basis of selective choice of ... titles ?
1
What is your argument/ation exactly pls, if it is not too much to ask ?
1
Is everything "going according to the plan" ? Is Vladimir Vladimirovich the master strategist or western agent or a puppet, like his protegeรฉ V. Yanukovych?
1
@JamesMunge Everyone is to blame (?) but poor Russia keeps on invading ...
1
@Princip666 The spokesperson for the trolls that don't answer... If South Korea political system in the 1950s was not great, it doesn't change what was North Korea (and maoist China) at that time. The sheer number of "South Koreans escaping to North Korea paradise" is telling. ๐๐๐
1
@Princip666 The title of a story: Red Square, in Moscow, they give away cars! The story: not in Moscow - but in Leningrad/St. Petersburg, not cars - but bicycles, and they don't give away - but they steal.
1
โ @evgeniya7853 Caligula introduced his horse into Rome's Senate - do you think it made the animal real senator?
1
@Princip666 Explain the 'logic' , pls, so Aristotle be happy.
1
@Princip666 You never claimed - explicitly. As it comes to the OP post, pls read it carefully.
1
@Princip666 Again, you act as if you knew what I did. No need to comment further.
1
Why have you left out KGB, GRU and Mossad? Do you work for any three-letter?
1
102, 980 day two, Monday the 20th, January, at nine minutes past nine am. 100 thousand around /before?/ midnight yesterday.
1
119,999 a minute to twelve o'clock midnight on Tuesday, the 21st of January, 2025 year.๐
1
Friday 126, 6xx at two o'clock in the afternoon midday, 24th of January, New number eight of vanishing posts. ๐ ๐
1
Frid 127, 667 after midnight twelve o'clock, On the 24th of January, Two thousand today ? ๐๐
1
Sun 129, 360 at about eleven o'clock in the morning approx. On the 26th of January 2025.
1
23.41 on Sunday the 26th of January 2025 130, oo8 ๐
1
Fifty views in thirty mins. 131 thousand at four minutes past midnight on the 27th of Jan.2025 . Fifty views in half an hour . 131,o40 at 00..38 Forty in 34 min
1
Thursday, on the 30th of January 2025, 133 , o5o at twenty-two minutes past midnight ๐๐๐
1
137 , 114 on the seventh of February, Friday, Twenty - something to four pm o'clock.
1
138 ,o33 on the tenth of February, Monday, at nine minutes past nine am
1
Mond 138 ,182 on the tenth of February, Around eleven o'clock at night.
1
*ceasefire ๐ In case you'd like to edit. Or is it play of words ?
1
@Princip666 pls provide them , spokesperson of no-reply -LaGrandeSynthese
1
@Princip666 Is this what you can come with? That's clearly not about "losing the war".
1
@Princip666 Remember how many troops France had on Keiser Germany territory when they won the 1WW 1918 ?
1
The sanctions don't work, Russian industry is self-sufficient , Oh wait, no
1