Comments by "Maria F." (@mariaf.6601) on "How soon can a NATO-Russia war happen?" video.

  1. Why did Russians attack Ukraine? Why do Russian journalists, experts and officials (!) talk about further attacks ?
    4
  2. ​ @claus-not-santa  Here we go again ... What's Russian in Königsberg / Kralovec ? China could ask about Siberia, some cities on Pacific Ocean coast... BTW, what's "all circumstances" when Russia is ruining itself already now?
    3
  3. Have you got actually any argument ?
    3
  4. Are you going to paste the same message of false under all videos?
    3
  5. Do you know what border is ? Anyway, "NATO taking over Ukraine" exist only in Russian propaganda (remember E. Prigozhin)
    3
  6. ​ @tebyaneebet131  Why is Putin propaganda threatening with attacks ?
    3
  7. Tucker Carlson comes to my mind.
    2
  8. 62,500 at seven in the evening , 19 February 15th Thursday , day one
    2
  9. 71 thousand at eight to eight in the evening, Thursday , February 15
    2
  10. 89 thousand in ten hours 10 21;55 five minutes to ten pm Thursday 15th Feb
    2
  11. 101 ,400 at half past eleven at night, eleven hours + forty-five minutes Day one
    2
  12. 110 , 324 at one am after midnight , thirteen hours first day
    2
  13. 129 thousand in 24 twenty-four hours Friday 16th February Now at 12..34 130 thousand
    2
  14. 142 , 3, 4 thousand about midnight Friday Saturday now half past twelve midnight 144, oxz
    2
  15. 290 ,080 thousand 8th March Friday around midnight. Three weeks and going.
    2
  16. 290,500 after one night Saturday , nine in the morning
    2
  17. Somehow it's Russia, much weaker than the US, that started the war in Ukraine, before in Georgia, before in Chechnya / Ichkeria ... you're talking about conquest yourself. APN didn't say anything about attacking Russia (second largest?)
    2
  18. How ?
    2
  19. Your message is outdated, no potato for you 😅 - Vladimir Vladimirovich said recently he won't negotiate when Ukraine hasn't got sufficient ammunition. I'm not sure he'll forgive that lapsus.
    2
  20. What peace talks are you writing about ?
    2
  21. The aviation, which is number one, isn't weak at all.
    2
  22. What facts or events would indicate that?
    2
  23.  @Princip666  What do you mean by "NATO has lost" ?
    2
  24.  @Princip666  What I'm asking about is "NATO has lost". What, how, against who ?
    2
  25. ​ @Wordsalad69420  Not much, but thanks for the reply anyway. If you consider limited attack aimed at breaking the alliance, not big battles, it looks very different. Mind 'little green men' in Crimea 10 years ago.
    2
  26. ​ @Wordsalad69420  I'm not sure you can see my reply - in short I'd see an operation in small area, limited means / forces / armament, quick to achieve at least symbolic success, at the same time possible to reverse in case of not forseen reaction. If in the development there are differences among various states members bigger than now about the war in Ukraine, that's bigger value for Russia than occupying some terrain. Next step will exploit any open possibility. That's what APN explained in his previous video
    2
  27. Afghanistan after Twin Tower attack 11 September ?
    2
  28. Looks like auto-challenge. Let us know how it's going.
    1
  29.  @claus-not-santa  I have my idea, but I acknowledge colonel Putin hasn't been clear at all about that. but- Are we talking about NATO or "peace loving Russians"? Any comment about Skabeyeva, Simonyan, Solovyov's shows? They aren't rogue workers of state tv.
    1
  30. 26,500 views in three hours, first 3 hrs Three pm 14.50 Thursday 15th of February
    1
  31. 291,111 at half past seven in the evening 9th March , Saturday
    1
  32. 292 ,022 at about nine o'clock in the morning of Sunday, 10th of March.
    1
  33. 299 ,079 Saturday 16th March about midnight , five to twelve.
    1
  34. NATO didn't agree to accept Ukraine in any stage, even if you go propaganda it has to have some facts right .
    1
  35. "He only wants" Trust me, Trust him. No, thanks.
    1
  36.  @claus-not-santa  Not exactly, but you get what I mean, these are one-side excuses. If there's any village named Odesa near Avdiyivka, Russia may have chance to take it - or not. Black Sea Odesa is unrealistic dream.
    1
  37. What kind of threat is NATO, according to you?
    1
  38. Old scratched record 😅 Russia had border with NATO since the beginning.
    1
  39.  @JORMUNREKKR  Right, even Kirkenes to Murmansk , so you see it's not an issue. Also president Putin said that Finland joining NATO (ie 1200 km border) is not a problem.
    1
  40. Where's the position of "encircled UA soldiers" pls?
    1
  41. ​ @Princip666 I'm asking where in (or near ?) the town, as of what I read there's rear guard staying there (most of the soldiers retreated).
    1
  42.  @Princip666  What's your source/s of that claims? How many dead , how many captured and how many encircled, according to you?
    1
  43. Invasion as a stepping up persuasion to comply with peace agreements. Very putinist. Göbbels and Orwell come to my mind.
    1
  44. Have you got any evidence for your claims ? As long as shared intelligence is no secret, participation of foreign army soldiers is questionable.
    1
  45. Why was Ukraine invaded, according to you ?
    1
  46. If you wrote in Russian it would be easier to express.
    1
  47. Nice to meet you, fantasy warmonger 😂
    1
  48. Have you listened to/ watch the video ?
    1
  49. What will Russia win? 'smuta' poverty like in the 1990s ?
    1
  50. Russia certainly none, putinism - raison d'etre.
    1
  51. What are your arguments?
    1
  52. Harsh words of yours to colonel Putin!
    1
  53. Fantastic, I suppose you live in a semi-free state, where you are happy.
    1
  54.  @wilfredprins9718  Which leader(s)? I know about propositions of fulfilling auxiliary tasks, nothing of air strikes.
    1
  55.  @Princip666  What are the goals you're writing about ? Not referring to NATO I suppose?
    1
  56.  @Princip666  Ask a bot, Meantime, are you able to answer the questions? to explain what you mean ? "NATO has lost"?
    1
  57.  @Princip666  Your problem is to reply how "NATO has lost".
    1
  58. Here we go again What agreement? Encircling Russia - this one is good indeed 😅
    1
  59.  @arthurrafferty4102  "The agreement" - I know there's none, there wasn't any such agreement. What you write about Russia's economy is military spending above its possibilities (see recent fund stealing) that doesn't bring development to the country, and if you mention inflation, give some examples of prices rising in Russia (except real estate market 😅)
    1
  60. What were the "actions of western elites" (whatever it's supposed to mean) in both wars in Chechnya Ichkeria ?
    1