Comments by "Brian Bob" (@brianbob7514) on "Tucker Carlson Defends Assange. Huh?" video.

  1. Tucker is better than all the cnn/msnbc idiots put together. Hilarious :)
    1
  2. Tucker has said many times that he has no editorial oversight at Fox. He can say whatever he wants. He is just not a party line drone.
    1
  3. Supernautiloid sure, that is more or less true for everyone who is employed. Even jimmy here would find himself without an audience if he starts saying things we don’t like.
    1
  4. Supernautiloid they both have bosses, they can both be out on their ass. YouTube channels don’t collapse or disappear? What I am saying about Tucker is that he is not handed a script to read like some others. Also, having your audience as your boss does not mean anything about the quality of your content. A lot of opposed ideologies have audience support. Heck, a lot of russiagate idiots are audience supported.
    1
  5. Supernautiloid I understand exactly what you are saying. Jimmy has multiply bosses, his audience, his political beliefs, google, YouTube. I could make a long list of things any political commentator doesn’t cover if I want to, it is easy. We all have our blind spots. True, some blind spots are genuine while others are paid for but from the outside it can be hard to tell. It is also hard to know how much honesty is really the most important thing. For instance, it seems like Rachel really does believe in Russia gate. Does that make her better or worse than somebody who is just getting paid to believe in Russia gate? I like Jimmy and Tucker because they are willing to have opinions that are contrary to their piers. This is a sign of integrity but not necessarily proof that they are right about anything in particular. I would just rather listen to people who are more or less honest about their views on topics. Jimmy’s views on Russia made his life at TYT harder. Perhaps Tucker’s opinion about Julian will make his life at Fox harder.
    1