Comments by "jaymz1999" (@jaymz1999) on "Veritasium" channel.

  1.  @kittenisageek  That is you saying that gods are responsible for everything you do not understand. People have made that mistake since the beginning of time but for every discovery made, no gods have ever been found. Not behind rocks, not under ground, not behind the clouds, not on the moon. Every time a completely natural explanation, never any gods.
    6
  2. Whatever flerf.
    5
  3. Why are you citing fables here?
    4
  4.  @kittenisageek  Why do you keep repeating that you do not understand, therefore gods? I asked for parameters, not childish excuses for not having any.
    4
  5. “The only way”? Because you can not think of anything else? You not knowing does not mean gods did it.
    3
  6.  @jonathanfrancesconi3355  If we go by ‘chance’. It’s not all by chance, but just let’s. What parameters did you use to exclude it?
    3
  7.  @jonathanfrancesconi3355  You mentioned ‘chance’ and implied that this could not have happened by it. I would like to know how you came to that conclusion.
    3
  8.  @kittenisageek  “Statistics” “system design” nice words, who taught you them? They have absolutely nothing to do with the probability of life forming and you mentioning them tells me that you just don’t understand, that either. Now, what parameters do you need to calculate probability? Since asking you what parameters you used went right passed you, because you never used any. You just made a conclusion based on your ignorance. Now didn’t you?
    3
  9. Evolution is a well proven fact that does not need believers to be true.
    3
  10. So in short, religion killed your brain.
    3
  11.  @VengefulPolititron  Well that was a buch of claims. Now prove your gods.
    3
  12.  @VengefulPolititron  I did not ask for that, I asked for your best evidence.
    3
  13.  @VengefulPolititron  Believing your “truth’ needs only gullibility. That’s all it takes, you need no research whatsoever. Copy/pasting pseudoscience claims is not research, sorry. Evolution is the name given to change over time and the ability to adapt given those changes. All evidence available points towards Evolution being true, add to that the observable part of it. Your problem is that you’ve been indoctrinated into believing a book full of guesses and fantasy describes reality. If that is your “reality’ your ‘reality’ will never fit actual reality, no matter how hard you try. You can lie about, cherrypick and massage your book and your ‘reality’ in absurdum in an attempt to make either of them fit reality. But you will never succeed, because none of them are even close. You do not even understand what evidence or proof is. I ask for it and you copy/paste what lies you’ve been fed. Let me explain this, as if you were the mental toddler that you are. You copy/pasting a list you assembled, not by “research” but just googled and copy/pasted, containing the words “Nephilim bones” is not evidence and it is not proof, it is a claim. Now, prove your fabled beings existed. Look, that’s how easy it is, even if I had to pick one for you. Prove that the creature you use to tell Evolution is a lie existed. Did they or can we just remove that “evidence” from your list?
    3
  14.  @VengefulPolititron  We already know how “splendid” you are. You were very eager to tell us so in the very first sentences you produced in this thread. But since you have produced nothing but lies so far, your splendidness is also most likely nothing but just another lie. I bet those “2000” hours is something you just pulled out of your backside after copy/pasting whatever you found that rhymed with your predetermined fantasy for an hour or two. I picked this one for you. I could’ve picked any single one of your copy/pasted “evidences” but this one is as good as any. “Nephilim bones” Prove that the creature you use to claim Evolution is a lie existed. Did they or can we just remove that “evidence” from your list?
    3
  15.  @mkultra4542  No, only people like you possess that ability. The one shouting he is Napoleon is totally convinced of that he know that he is. It is completely irrelevant to that person how many people that know that he is not.
    3
  16. Please prove this creator of yours.
    2
  17.  @amuslimguy  Complexity is not in any way proof of your proposed gods.
    2
  18.  @amuslimguy  It’s hard for you. Complexity is not in any way proof of a designer. Evolution is not chance. It is changes snd adaptation. You throwing three dices getting three sixes does not prove the result was designed. This video does not prove a designer in the same way a video of the placement of grains of sand are ordered on the beach does not prove a designer.
    2
  19.  @amuslimguy  We know computer programs are written by human beings, and other computers may I add. We can compare new code to old code and conclude they were all created this way. We know iPhones are designed and created by human beings. We can compare different iPhones and conclude that they all were designed and created by human beings. Now, what other life, that you know was designed and created can you present as an comparison to the one you are claiming was designed or created?
    2
  20.  @amuslimguy  You are wrong and you describes why yourself. We recognize design and creation because we can compare it to known designs and creations. You can compare an ancient tool to other tools. You can compare a cave painting to other paintings. What other life that you know was designed and/or created can you present as a comparison to the one you are claiming was designed and/or created? The answer is none. Therefore you can not conclude that it was neither designed or created. You not understanding how it came to be or you feeling that it had to be designed and/or created because you can not think of anything else is not an argument.
    2
  21.  @amuslimguy  A “painting” of an animal in the sky, in the form of a cloud, came about naturally. Even if there are people that credit that to gods too. As there are people crediting the position of stars to gods. It is reasonable to conclude that a cave painting was created by an intelligence. Because, and again, we can compare it to other paintings known to have been created by an intelligence. When it comes to life we do not have that kind of comparison and therefore it is not reasonable to conclude there was any “intelligence” behind it. Fact remains, you do not know. That’s it. You not knowing does not mean gods did it. How hard is this to understand, really? You want it to be true, but that does not make it true. No matter how hard you try.
    2
  22.  @amuslimguy  Are you claiming to be the ignorant person you describe? Is that it? We should look at life, pretending to know nothing about it and then do the except thing you are doing? Say you do not understand, therefore gods? Is this the method you would like to use to figure things out? The best method available to us is science and in science we do not say “I do not understand, therefore magic”. What you see in this video is not evidence for any intelligence. As are not thunder, wind, tree rings, the pattern on a leaf, the shape of clouds or whatever. I know that you really really want gods to be real and that you are scanning and cherrypicking your whole existence to try and prove they are. But this is not it, sorry.
    2
  23.  @amuslimguy  You claimed a creator. Prove your creator.
    2
  24.  @amuslimguy  If your proposed creator exist you can prove it to me. You could prove it to anyone.
    2
  25.  @amuslimguy  Your firs premise? The claim that your god is a creator? That is a claim, not proof.
    2
  26.  @amuslimguy  Or the second one, the claim that complex design needs a designer? That is another claim. Well that’s two claims actually. Now we have three claims without proof. I bet I will only find claims if I continue to read what you have written so far. When are you going to provide the proof you are talking about?
    2
  27.  @amuslimguy  Your firs premise is a fallacy. What you feel about something is separate from what is real.
    2
  28.  @amuslimguy  Why do you not just prove your creator?
    2
  29.  @amuslimguy  No, you did not, you made claims. Claims is different from proof. Proof is what makes a claim true. You need to provide proof for your claims, not more claims.
    2
  30.  @amuslimguy  What you think is complex is irrelevant to the existence, or in this case the non existence of gods.
    2
  31. We have no evidence of design.
    2
  32. Are you suggesting ‘we non’t know therefor gods?
    2
  33.  @jamesproudlove1527  Why not?
    2
  34.  @jamesproudlove1527  Please don’t use ‘chance’. It diminish the real mechanisms of Evolution.
    2
  35. What are you suggesting?
    2
  36. We have no evidence for any creator or designer.
    2
  37. No no no, the fool say “I don’t know, therefor gods”.
    2
  38. Ignorance is saying that you do not understand, therefore gods.
    2
  39. Really? Who told you that?
    2
  40. Aaaw, how cute. A “truther”😂
    2
  41. No gods needed, sorry.
    2
  42. That is an argument from ignorance. You are welcome.
    2
  43. Prove your designer.
    2
  44.  @kb24crazylaker  So Hobbits are real then. Good to know.
    2
  45. No gods needed. No magic spells needed.
    2
  46.  @junoonesiahat5504  My parents made me.
    2
  47. That’s a claim, now prove it.
    2
  48. Google ‘argument from ignorance’.
    2
  49. You not understanding does not mean gods did it.
    2
  50.  @mkultra4542  That’s let me se 1, 2, well let’s say it’s four. They actually more, I could count seven separate claims. The only thing you said was that you do not know, “therefore gods”. That is both your “argument” and your “evidence”. Let me ask you, for how long have you been doing this?
    2