Comments by "peekaboo peekaboo" (@peekaboopeekaboo1165) on "Forgotten Weapons" channel.

  1.  @aqsuperman  Courtesy of the Yanks. That are still conducting lowkey 'regime change' in Communist Vietnam.
    6
  2.  @gordonhuskin7337  In the context of current, present situation. Vietnam is a Socialist State but run by the Communist party. A Democracy can have a Socialist gov as a result of elections.
    4
  3.  @ineedlean  The same thing they've said of the Japanese, Koreans & Chinese from Taiwan & HK
    3
  4. This civilian version is different to the original Military version. Look it up for yourself in Wikipedia.
    3
  5. Another Chinese-bashing "review" by Ian --- intentionally did not mention features removed from the original military version. This time around, it's overt! Unlike the "Chinese Mystery Pistols" -- covert or subtle. Obviously, this is Ian's unofficial Chinese new year presentation.
    2
  6. For the time being. As US is still hell bent on it's 'regime change' agenda throughout the world.
    2
  7. Yes. This civilian version had features removed from the original Military version. Ian intentionally made no mention about it. Another Chinese-bashing "review" by Ian. This time around, it's overt! Unlike the "Chinese Mystery Pistols" -- covert or subtle. Obviously, this is Ian's unofficial Chinese new year presentation.
    2
  8. Ian has anti-Chinese sentiment. Ian intentional "butchering" of the person's Chinese name. And spread misinformation about Chinese small arms was inferior to Vietnam at that time --- even though VN received Chinese small arms to fight the yanks.
    2
  9.  @gordonhuskin7337  Vietnam is far from it. A matter of fact -- ain't a sh*thole anymore.
    2
  10. Apparently, covert collab with other YouTuber (Mark Felton's)
    2
  11.  @si_vis_pacempara_bellum4906  Glock issued to Xinjiang Police SWAT units is due to strategic consideration -- in case of an incident where terrorists stole a Police SWAT pistol.
    2
  12.  @armchairgeneralissimo  Who were the targets?
    2
  13.  @jeffho1727  you mean the Vietcong's Russian & Chinese ammos?
    2
  14. Rigged by Ian. Another Chinese-bashing "review" by Ian --- intentionally did not mention features removed from the original military version. This time around, it's overt! Unlike the "Chinese Mystery Pistols" -- covert or subtle. Obviously, this is Ian's unofficial Chinese new year presentation.
    2
  15. ya pretty much a  neocon Chinese from Singapore. WHO"S gonna take away ya freedom........Malaysia ? Indonesia ? Singapore supports NATO/Western interests , because it's leaders are all lapdogs of 'Murica and their Sheriff for Asia-Pacific, Australia .
    1
  16. Khanclansith land grabs? dos islands,islets, reefs,atolls and surrounding waters are disputed areas in question. it's the reason why PRC and other countries are claiming em. 
    1
  17. actually China's claims -- and that of Taiwan/ROC are also valid. The US and Britain did christened it South China Sea for a reason.
    1
  18. Khanclansith Not true. official docs by US and British, and that of other European and also Japanese sources, shows China as legit sovereignty .
    1
  19. WTF are you talking about?! China, be it PRC or ROC, don't claim Hungary or the EU, or even Mongolia. BTW, where's the unofficial diplomatic protest by Mongolia against Taiwan....if any at all.
    1
  20. Twist and Shout! Let it all out! 'ya another of those intellectual haters engaging in historical revisionism and false claims.
    1
  21.  @leeenfield3404  Yeah.....buy stuff from Vietnam instead. Another Communist-authoritarian country.
    1
  22. Another Chinese-bashing "review" by Ian --- intentionally did not mention features removed from the original military version. This time around, it's overt! Unlike the "Chinese Mystery Pistols" -- covert or subtle. Obviously, this is Ian's unofficial Chinese new year presentation.
    1
  23. Dear Ian -- they're called the KMT or Chinese Nationalist Party (aka Chinese Nationalist)
    1
  24.  @ryth-2401  This SMG is meant for non-front line combat operations -- but a Personal defense weapon in non-combat role.
    1
  25.  @EstellammaSS  Ian's basically claiming this civilian version and the original Military version are both lousy. In regards to the features -- you can look it up in Wikipedia: QCW-05/JS9/QCQ-05
    1
  26.  @PanzerPlant  Ian made allusion, innuendo and insinuation about it.
    1
  27. Are the guns-shooting range owners & operators -- white Americans?
    1
  28.  @baker90338  Shucks. I'm not even a Chinese national.
    1
  29.  @nguyetho7847  Indoctrinated both by the VN communist party and the US and it's 'close friends and allies'.
    1
  30. Another Chinese-bashing "review" by Ian. This time around, it's overt! Unlike the "Chinese Mystery Pistols" -- covert or subtle. Obviously, this is Ian's unofficial Chinese new year presentation.
    1
  31. Ian's getting politically correct with the description of "incursion" instead of invasion by Japan.
    1
  32. And a corrupt government represented bh the KMT.
    1
  33. Don't enjoy it too much. Ian actually bash China.
    1
  34.  @jackdoe7401  I only saw this video recently. And Ian ain't talking actual pistols in serviced with the Chinese Police.
    1
  35. What if ---- "No country for old men II"?......"Anton Chigurh" armed with this!
    1
  36.  @gordonhuskin7337  Not Commies but Socialist+anarchist.
    1
  37.  @gordonhuskin7337  Nope. Communism is total control. Socialism is the opposite.
    1
  38.  @gordonhuskin7337  Yes. In practice it was different.
    1
  39. @HO LAM YIU How the riots doing for ya'll Antifa copycats!
    1
  40.  Shoudday Cha  Type 81 AR developed/entered service in the year 1981.
    1
  41. Rigged by Ian. Another Chinese-bashing "review" by Ian. This time around, it's overt! Unlike the "Chinese Mystery Pistols" -- covert or subtle. Obviously, this is Ian's unofficial Chinese new year presentation.
    1
  42. FW, did you intentionally skirt over the ZH-05 or QTS-11 and the LG5 ??
    1
  43. It's planned in advance for US anti-Chinese agenda.
    1
  44.  @trooperdgb9722  The US is no longer a pro-ROC. As it's agenda is to promote separatism on the Chinese nation!
    1
  45.  @trickbear  No. Technically speaking.
    1
  46. Fyi -- the PROC has been a quasi Capitalist system for decades.
    1
  47.  @benjaminheim735  The commune system was/is central planning. A hallmark of typical Communist state.
    1
  48.  @andersjjensen  Which is also a disinformation. As Japan surrendered and thus ended their annexation of Taiwan.
    1
  49.  @RookieL021  Taiwan was return to China.
    1
  50.  @andersjjensen  Illusion. The CPC didn't "lost" Taiwan. For Taiwan is still Chinese via the KMT's ROC. KMT got help directly and openly from the US with it's Navy! On the other hand, CPC didn't have direct and open help from the Soviet (ie. pre-split in 1962).
    1