General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Jim
David Pakman Show
comments
Comments by "Jim" (@jimohara) on "Is this Charlie Kirk's dumbest anti-trans argument ever?" video.
Charlie Kirk is clearly in the right here. Even though David only sought to cut him off halfway through his argument. You need to be super brainwashed to accept that men can be women and women can be men. Not all men or not all women are the same but that doesn’t mean men are actually women or women are actually men. Pakman doesn’t actually believe any different himself, rather he’s just gauged the way he thinks the wind is blowing. But he’s wrong. It’s a simple matter of fact that the majority of people on earth do not accept the tenets of Trans ideology. That may not mean that the majority is necessarily correct but come on, a man that thinks he’s a woman is a man who thinks he’s a woman and a woman that thinks she’s a man is a woman who she’s a man. In no way does that mean a man is a woman or a woman is a man. I don’t think a failure of anyone to actualize should be encouraged but apparently that suits the ‘Think like a Scientist’, ‘Think like a Detective’, ‘Think like a Voter’ author. ‘Think how to BS a Planet full of ret ar ds ought to be the title of his next book.
1
@jamiejp4007 No. Not going to happen for you. Say it the other way round. Gender identity is not the same as biological sex. 🤷
1
@Brozius2512 Well, if ‘gender identity’ is somehow a thing now and it’s somehow on ‘a spectrum’ then doesn’t that spectrum exist between two different poles? If a man wants to wear make up and clothes and have a hairstyle like women then that’s a man who wants to present themselves to society as a woman. That doesn’t make them any less of a man. Or any more of a woman. And vice versa with women that prefer to present as more masculine. You have to be able to understand that the vast majority of other people in the world are not, for want of a better word, ‘brainwashed’ like you are. Granting that ‘gender identity’ is different from ‘biological sex’ that does not necessarily mean that. ‘gender identity’ usurps ‘biological sex’ in determining who is a man and who is a woman. I don’t understand how you can’t hold your own think outside of whatever BS is shoved down your throat by other people. And then you act so snotty about it because you can act like you’re the ‘educated’ one when, in reality, you’re failing yourself and those around you as a human being. Does it ever even ever occur to you that you are a human being? Or would you may as well be a parrot? Those are honest questions btw
1
@Brozius2512 Explain to me why ‘gender identity’ usurps ‘biological sex’ as the distinction between a man and a woman then.
1