Comments by "Jim" (@jimohara) on "Trump LOSES IT Over Being Under Criminal Investigation" video.

Jennifer Middleton That’s the Royal ‘We’ because they wear the Crown and technically the subject’s loyalty is to the Crown first and not the wearer of it.
5
@louise_rose Well I look at it differently so I disagree with you to a certain extent. The way I’d look at it is that Joe Biden, say, has been a politician for 47years before he became President, what did he ever do before he became involved in politics? Same with the Obama’s, Barrack, and Michelle graduated law school and went straight onto the Democrat gravy train. Intern , make connections, get appointed to boards outsmart your opponents trying to do the same. Same with Bush, daddy was President brother a governor, put himself forward, everyone that’ll scratch his back he’ll scratch theirs. The Clintons . Once again straight out of law school and straight into a political party scratching each others back and making a personal fortune out of holding political positions in the first place. And that goes on right through the ranks of each political party, Senators, Congresspeople, Governors, Mayors, right down to DAs and council members. Everybody gets paid Republican or Democrat ,as long as they’re part of the in crowd. Then Trump comes along, who’s independently wealthy, and he steals the Republican nomination and goes onto win the Presidency. What happens? The entire corrupt establishment and their allies in the media lose their minds and go out of their way to destroy him and prevent him from being re-elected. Meantime his personal wealth takes a massive loss and the DOJ is weaponized against him . All for having dared to interfere with the money grabbing war cheering political establishment. Do you think that Trump was a property developer in NY and he never had to deal with politicians before? Do you think that he never had any developments abroad and he didn’t have to learn foreign political parties before? What exactly was Obama’s international experience compared to Trump’s before Obama, the former Democratic Senator for Illinois (crook!) , became President? What exactly was his or Biden’s work history? What exactly was Hillary Clinton’s work history before she entered politics? I hate to break it to you but Trump lived his whole life like he was going to be President one day. He was that full of himself that that he assumed so literally 40 years ago or more. And he was right, when he went for being President he ended up being President and even though he’s not now he has taken control of the Republican voter base so hopefully he can eliminate at least some of those Republican politicians that are no use to anyone. I really hope he’s not finished yet
2
@louise_rose No. I’m one of those people that’s a bit suspicious of people who enter a career in politics with no previous work history and manage end up making a fortune out of it somehow. I’m much more suspicious of a politician that becomes a multimillionaire than I am of a multimillionaire that becomes a politician so a big NO to your suggestions of what someone needs to do in order to be qualified to be President. Essentially you’re saying citizens should be excluded unless they’re paid up card carrying members of the political elite. Tyranny- just say no.
2
That’s so sad so many on this thread feel that way. I mean that’s a real indicator of how empty your hollow lives must be. Sad. Hate to break it to you but that wasn’t a meltdown from Trump no matter how desperately David tried to present it as such. David had no argument against it and didn’t even attempt to refute what Trump said for a reason. He also couldn’t bring himself to read what Trump said about rising crime in NY at the end in case his audience would hear actual information. Guess he knows his audience. Wankers.
2
@MultiBlackmind Well, he wasn’t asking for a favor from the President of Ukraine was he? He was just informing the President of Ukraine of the shitshow he’d inherited from the Obama administration wasn’t he?
2
Don’t run for President if you’re outside of the political establishment otherwise you’ll find yourself under criminal investigation is what’s actually being said Jerry
1
@louise_rose IMO Trump was only the most incompetent, racist and corrupt President since his predecessor the former Democratic Senator from Illinois. That guy was kinda hard for anyone to top when it came to incompetent racist corruption
1
@louise_rose I seem to remember it was John McCain (R) that sank Trump’s healthcare bill. Did it never occur to you the threat Trump posed to corrupt Republicans when he won the nomination? Look at the turnover in staff he had to deal with because of all the dung bags that existed in Washington. I’m glad to see he’s still clearing out the trash in the Republican Party even though he was defeated in 2020. You should be glad of that too. Btw, Biden made more rules by executive order in his first hundred days than the previous three Presidents combined or thereabouts so people in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones. Fair enough about a third of Biden’s EOs were overturning Trump’s EOs but even with that Biden has been running an inferior sort of government (your words) far more than Trump. Remember when Democrats said they were going to impeach Trump even before he took office? And you wonder how he’d problems getting legislation past? Remember how the Russia hoax was immediately brought into play against him? Do you have a clue how the FBI was weaponized against him? Or how activist judges opposed him only to end up being overruled for their false objections?
1
Well, if your not fit to read it yourself in the first place maybe it’s difficult for you. Poor David had to skip the commas and blast on through least he’d have to address the subject of the post. Pathetic
1
@robinlillian9471 Yep. Thank you. I take it you noticed how David ‘nuance’ Pakman went out of his way not to address any nuance or any of the details here. That’s classic David, and people on this channel get upset when I call him out for being a spin doctor. What else is this segment other than trying to put a spin on Trump’s rebuttal. At the end of the day this DA campaigned on the promise that she was going to prosecute a person not that she was going to prosecute a crime and there’s no getting around that. David knows that’s wrong that’s why he can’t say it but he also knows his audience is too dumb to know any better. Hence his framing. And the dummies fall for it and even some of them get off on it. Sad, sad pathetic excuses for people . Makes me worry about the stability of the United States
1
Haha David triggered. Couldn’t take Trump’s rebuttal so he had to read it out at speed ignoring commas. David couldn’t respond to it either and deal with what it was Trump was saying. And then when he got to the end where Trump pointed out the rising crime in NYC, well, David just left that bit out. Skipped over it and he never dealt with what Trump points out, this woman campaigned on the promise that she would prosecute a person not that she would prosecute a crime. Sorry but that’s not how justice is supposed to work in the US or anywhere else for that matter. But as David said yesterday, it doesn’t matter if Trump is found guilty of anything he’s charged with as long as those charges prevent him from running again in 2024, right? Take a good hard look at yourselves Pakman fans. What sort of a person is he?
1
@Fist Bump I miss my Trumpie 😢. It’s just good to know he hasn’t gone away yknow
1
@elaineburnett5230 no, she’s a political appointee. She’s not law enforcement
1
Nuclear Christian what difference would it make that a corrupt DA was a woman or a black woman? The only thing he’s worried about is that the DA is not on the level. No wait, maybe you’re onto something here, maybe black women who are in public positions of power are more not on the level than any other folk. Let’s ask Jesse Lee Peterson and see what he has to say
1
@KM-nd6wj must be really satisfying for you that billionaire tech giants can dictate how political leaders can communicate with the American people. Hahaha right?
1
@MultiBlackmind No. I think you’ll find he’s being denied the opportunity to speak against the echo chamber that you’ve bought into. Must be a relief for you, you can just believe what you’re told now
1
He wasn’t really losing it was he though? Sorry to disappoint you but someone is allowed to speak in defense of themselves without being accused of losing it
1
@X2LR8 I don’t know. The AG can use their power to stretch the thing out for as long as possible and what can he do against that? Obviously if she ever brought him to trial he would completely crush her. But like David said yesterday that’s not the point. As long as she can prevent him from running for President again it doesn’t matter whether he’s guilty of what he’s accused of or not. That’s what David said , as long as Trump can’t run again that’s what’s really important. Not whether he’s guilty of what he’s accused of the important thing is that her prosecution can be used to stop Trump from running for office again. David said that straight out, completely bare faced no rights or wrongs about it and these dicks that follow him on here act as if it’s almost like they got their first ride or something.
1
@kevinstrother8712 If he’s brought to trail and has to take the stand you mean. You might imagine even if he even if he is guilty he’s still wealthy enough to afford lawyers that are cleverer enough to not allow that to happen.
1