Comments by "Jim" (@jimohara) on "Kamala selects her VP, TREMENDOUS CHOICE!" video.

But they’re not. Yet. That was a prediction that David was making, “They’re going to bring up…”. That means it hasn’t actually happened. Typical Pakman strawman argument.
11
@kstar1489 Look at what the OP said ‘How can they bring up a DUI from 30yrs ago?’. Well 🤷 who is this ‘they’? David doesn’t say . And by his own admission he’s saying that it hasn’t happened yet. But the OP responds by acting like it has happened when David was only suggesting what will happen. David could be right or he could be wrong but the OP has responded by assuming that it has happened. With no evidence provided of this occurring. Speculation on David’s part and ‘OMG! How can they do this?’ in response. David is saying ‘this is what they will do’ and the OP is saying ‘how can they do this?’. That’s two different tenses. Why do I need to explain that to you? How do you not know that yourself? Were you deceived as well?
2
@ferox965 It’s ‘FOX fan fiction’ that David actually said in this video that ‘They’re going to bring up….’? Why don’t you watch the video again and witness who is telling the truth and who is obviously surviving on lying and completely made up cope? If you have to make things up to support your idea that’s not a good indication about the sort of person you are. FOX News is not even broadcast in the UK unless you really go out of your way to get it. I am subscribed to their YouTube channel but it’s not as if I have much respect for an American television station.
1
@SebuSabounjian Well, educate me then. Arguing about a proposition that without stating when or where that proposition has been proposed let alone not saying who made it isn’t arguing against a straw man? Do you think you’re being smart by splitting hairs? Logical fallacies are for dumb people anyway given the illogical nature of this world.
1
@atomicus5000 Imagine predicting that a DUI from almost 30 years ago isn’t going to be a major issue. Wow! It’s almost like David is psychic or something.
1
@atomicus5000 Why is the OP reacting to what was alleged. Wasn’t I trying to point out where the fault was?
1
It’s obviously not a problem then
1
@nathangardner772 Well, obviously you cared about it 👍
1
@nathangardner772 Good for you man
1
@SebuSabounjian I did look up what Wiki had to say about strawman argument. Still don’t think that invalidates my OP. Nobody is going to be swayed by Tampon Tim’s DUI from 30 years ago and while people have and will bring it up it’s not the correct attack line. I still think David was presenting a phantom argument as a means to attack his opposition. Another way of looking at it would be that David and I are in complete agreement about the issue but David chose prophylactic action as the easiest attack vector.
1