Comments by "Jim" (@jimohara) on "WOW: Key witness against Trump prosecutor CRUMBLES on witness stand" video.

@DaveP-uv1ml Sure threaten both of their lives for pursuing the truth, why don’t you?
2
That was the first thing you thought? How long did that take you?
1
@elsierodgers4874 Well, now we’ve seen his text messages between him and the lawyer that has him on the stand it sure looks like he’s been gotten at and threatened since.
1
@DaveP-uv1ml What do you mean that it would come at the expense of Ashley’s personal life? What would? Representing her client? So is that the word out now? Don’t represent these clients to the best of your ability or else it’ll come at the expense of your personal life and your career? 🤔 interesting. I suspect that poor Terence got his warning that sexual harassment allegation that was, for some reason, laid bare in court the other day, could be made into a criminal case against him if he spilled the beans and that is why Terence clammed up on the stand. Why else do you think Nathan Wade remained standing in the courtroom while everyone else was seated for the first half of poor Terence’s testimony? Could it be more apparent that the witness was being intimidated? And now we have the text messages, where Terry said he couldn’t remember why he said what he wrote a month ago because the event he was referring to happened years ago. And, rewinding back, it took Wade a similarly comically long time to decide whether he’d been to a cabin or not. They say doctors are the worst patients, well, the same goes for lawyers being witnesses. There’s been like two weeks of a complete clown show on display to the entire world, the only way Willis and Wade will get off without censor is because the Judge is corrupt as F. 🍿 Let’s see.
1
@DaveP-uv1ml To be more precise I meant threaten the professional life. Merchant was in contact with Bradley in a professional capacity and Bradley, as a lawyer, knew that at the time. Then, the other day when Bradley was first on the stand the Willis/Wade team asked him about the allegations of sexual harassment and the $20k he left behind him when parting company. Terence got the message, he could be facing a criminal prosecution if says the wrong thing about the wrong people. And you didn’t see the accidental camera reveal of Nathan Wade standing at the front of the courtroom when Bradley was giving this second day of testimony. There’s something rotten in Fulton county and it’s an open secret to the world now. Incidentally, you might not be aware but when all these court cases first started coming about against Trump, David Pakman had a video on his channel gloating that Trump was finding it difficult to find legal representation. He was gloating that Trump was struggling to find legal representation because lawyers were intimidated about the consequences for their career if they dared to work for Trump. That’s how nasty David Pakman is.
1
@DaveP-uv1ml So, this ‘casual’ conversation took place BEFORE. Trump’s codefendant hired her as his attorney? Before Willis brought the RICO case? Maybe, maybe, Bradley didn’t catch that on at the time but something has sure made him change his tune since. He’s found himself caught between a rock and a hard place. Hence his ‘I do not recall’ testimony about why he said what he said in those text messages. It’s been a pretty comical hearing the way things have gone down. What’s the judge going to do?
1
This is the same witness who said he couldn’t remember saying why he couldn’t remember. We’ve got the text messages between him and Merchant. We’ve got the phone data. We’ve got the money Wade was being paid. We’ve got no declaration and no receipts from Willis. This has gone so terribly for Willis I’m interested in hearing how David is going to try and spin this one. Oh, and we’ve already had witness testimony and evidence of coordination with the Whitehouse. Cue massive amounts of BS from the Pakman. 🍿
1