Comments by "Jim" (@jimohara) on "Video Released of Trump Riot Pipe Bomber, $100,000 Reward" video.

Definitely not. What sort of a people would turn a family member in for money. Turn them in for principle yes, turn them in for their own good or for the good of others fine, but turning in own of your own for a lousy 100 grand? Not worth it for the black mark you’d have to carry the rest of your life.
5
I agree
3
@Mainely what bounties on what right wing domestic terrorists?
2
@DaemonJax The body mass index indicates radical Marxist feminist to me. A flat chest wouldn’t negate that analysis, small saggy tits would fit the profile. Anybody catch the shoe size? Isn’t there stature and gait recognition software for this kinda thing
1
@user-ro9md9wp3j More felonies are committed by men than women aren’t they?
1
@nimrodthewise836 No. In reality that would never fly in the court of public opinion. An action like that would need to be clean and need to seen to be clean. I’m just saying, so that everyone knows, there’s no way ever you could do dirt like that and hope to keep it secret from them that look for dirt. That’s 100% because it only takes one to crack it and then all the rest will flow on the back of that like a never ending tide. Fair enough, in some communities it’ll matter more than others but where I’m from a move like that would stick to you like shit to a blanket. Gossip behind your back would be that bad it would come to define you. And worse, when your children came of age and introduced themselves to the world that’s what they’d be known by. Fuck that!. Turning on one of your family because they’re a baddie or because you think they’re a baddie is one thing. Turning them in for a cash reward is quite another. It’s about respect, so for all that big talk , yes a 100 grand reward could feasibly work among those who’s ambitions don’t arise as high as respect. From looking at the footage that David showed, I’d be willing to venture that the person that placed the pipe bombs was not the same person that crafted them.. I’d go as far as saying that’s obvious by appearances. Would you agree? Just by looking at the footage and information that David shared would you conclude that the person that placed the pipe bombs was not the person that made the pipe bombs or would you hold back on making an assumption like that?Would you say it was as equally or near equally as possible that the person that planted the bombs was also the person that constructed them. Or would you say you have no way of knowing that from what you’ve seen?
1
Nathan Blair No. If family is terrorist they’re still family. In fact 99 times out of 100 even more so.Maybe you can’t see that from your high horse but believe me that’s the way it is Almost the same as if family is criminal except more like a million times more so When the terrorist has support from the community they come from their family becomes as hard as rocks. Fact.
1
Didn’t Kamala Harris and her staff donate money to the Minnesota Freedom Fund to bail people arrested for rioting last year? I think I remember how it was reported at the time the same fund bailed people arrested for domestic violence and sex offenses? And it was reported last week that a man bailed out by the same fund killed someone in a road rage incident. All those riots and public disorder last year and when Trump sent in federal troops to quell disturbances in Portland Pelosi called them Trump’s stormtroopers. Yet after Jan 6th she was inquiring about having armed machine gun posts around the Capitol.
1
More like Trump’s pro Democracy protesters will need to have proper security in case they’re attacked by DC authorities again 👀
1