Comments by "" (@patriot4786) on "Palestinians: Where are you from?" video.

  1. This question is like asking a Native American (Indian) in the US where are they from. LoL
    19
  2. Yes he spoke out of historical fact
    3
  3.  Michael Smith  youre not even a middle eastern and you are talking as if you know more than them who have lived in that land since the times of the prophets.. before those arab countries u mentioned werent in existance, back then the arab ancestors used to travel and visit different nations.. so those palestinians who speak arabic can be considered as natives there because their ancestors lived in and out of that region. Meanwhile the non palestinians (jews) in palestine/israel when u ask their ancestry, most of them say they are from europe, morroco, africa, etc.. so it is more applicable I would say that the arabic speaking palestinians are considered to be natives of jerusalem and its surroundings. Hebrew speakers who have original ancestry in those region can also be considered natives but not those who have ashkenazi and european ancestry, they are all migrants
    1
  4.  Michael Smith  yes, in that case I agree with you that before muslims and christians Jews have been living in that land, and yes they I would agree to some extent that they share the same DNA with present palestinians.. But the issue are the zionist regime who mostly consist of non native jerusalemians whos ancestors would have probably been migrants and then oppress the native palestinians.. that is what I strongly object.
    1
  5.  Michael Smith  as you already proclaimed in the beginning of your sentence that the idea of a jewish state in the present "israel" territory was established to home presecuted jews around the world, so why did they made such nation in the first place if they knew arabs have lived in that territory for thousands of years. They could have lived under arab rule wherein Islamic law commands any Islamic ruler to safeguard and give the right to any non muslim living in an islamic country. They could have done that, instead making a new country for themselves in the native lands of the arabs. It is as if the Americas which were inhabited by the native Indians for thousands of years before the Europeans came was inevitably first visited by flocks of Europeans and they demanded to build a nation exclusively for them in native Indian territory, the Indians would have never allowed that if such incident took place in the past, thats why Europeans fought and murdered the native indians so that they could control their land. The same is happening and has happened in Israel towards the native arabs/palestinians
    1
  6.  Michael Smith  well for the sake of argument, that land is holy to for christians and muslims so why not coexist really.. as simple as that.
    1