Comments by "GuyWhoLikesTheSnarkies14" (@guywholikesthesnarkies1435) on "Geopolitical Economy Report" channel.

@aprescoup I don't think your cryptic polemical nonsense would even argue anything I said above to your own content, but go off. Make yourself appears stupider than ever here lmao
1
@aprescoup 2) I'm not inclined to learn your suggested theory whatsoever. You're engaging in intellectual dishonesty as evident with your blunt rejection to the facts we all have been elaborating it to you. What makes you think we're gonna listen to your perspective in such self-righteous manner after dismissing our perspective completely with constant ad hominem like that? "..let your athropied two braincells do the works." Hey, I'm the one👈 who was stating the real factual data up there☝️, not you who tried to divert discussion and made that very stupid ad hominem right now.
1
@aprescoup 3) We, Indonesian, have already experienced neo-fascism for well over 30 years under New Order, you think you got any idea what life's like back then? You think you can tell what's being taught in our textbooks up to the high school in New Order, before you snobhead start to persuade me to read that stupid theory again? From a LITERAL FASCIST himself?? If you think you can prove your intellectual honesty right here then show me that right now, instead of throwing another ad hominem like that petty insults you got all there just because you had nothing worthy to argue and desperate for a strawman (yes, this is the truth and you gotta own it up).
1
@aprescoup Also, I'm gonna make sure you won't be cherry picking a part of my replies and you gotta start reading them up from start. Whenever you're ready to argue, I can wait for it. There's no excuse that my argument is "wasting your time", online public space like YT comment section is designed to allow flexibility since nobody's forcing you to reply to every single of their comment. You're just proving your intellectual dishonesty by deflecting from argument and moving on to start another one, for example like you did recently on Danny's video. Also, you're the one who started to argue with op here out of mere sense of self-righteousness.
1
@aprescoup No, you're not telling any truth here but throwing empty ad hominem once again, trying to pass it as "fact" because you're desperate for strawman. I'll repeat it again, you said "Xi Jinping literally said.." in the aforementioned reply of yours above and you didn't elaborate if it's he indeed said that against my objection. I said already, if you think you can tell me the truth then you gotta show it. Like all those paragraph-long factual replies I thrower them at you earlier on, those aren't the same as your petty ad hominem right here.
1
@aprescoup Also, what did I say in my reply right above yours there? I won't let you to cherry-pick just an excerpt of all my replies above, that's what I said. Don't pretend like you don't see it at all, I said it to everyone already you can look at hidden comments by sorting it from the newest comment first. This is fact you can't deny.
1
@kphamcao "Can you convince me most of them have returned to China?" Where have you been all this time? Brain drain is already happening, most Chinese scientists in US are preparing to and already returned to China.
1
@kphamcao Like seriously https://youtu.be/6RSEg35oHfs, where have you been?? Ironically, you're the only person here showing your own grandiosity complex for US. Not us for China, we're merely showing you truths.
1
@kphamcao At last, you're chickened out just like the other White dude I've dealt with several comments above. You should've never engaged here in the first place if you don't actually have anything to argue about lol
1
@aprescoup You still owe me an argument debt, White boy. Don't you just thinking of chickening away and starting this exact same talking point with another person, not in Danny's video😉 Now look up your notification and see my last reply to you earlier☝️
1
@aprescoup Oh, you did. Your last reply to me prove that and I gave you mine, no pretense. Now, please elaborate your response.
1
Lmao, so our White boy aprescoup just wrote this out in Danny's latest video, admitting his true face🤭 Michels was a socialist ("Politically, he moved from Social Democratic Party to the Italian Socialist Party, adhering to the Italian revolutionary syndicalist wing and later to Italian fascism, which he saw as more democratic form of socialism." ..and Mussolini was a marxist, he was a socialist before turning into a fascist! ("Born to a socialist father, Mussolini was named after leftist Mexican President Benito Juárez. His two middle names, Amilcare and Andrea, came from Italian socialists Amilcare Cipriani and Andrea Costa. Early in Mussolini’s life, for instance, those names seemed appropriate. While living in Switzerland from 1902 to 1904, he cultivated an intellectual image and wrote for socialist periodicals such as L’Avvenire del Lavoratore (The Worker’s Future). He then served in the Italian army for nearly two years before resuming his career as a teacher and journalist. In his articles and speeches, Mussolini preached violent revolution, praised famed communist thinker Karl Marx and criticized patriotism. In 1912 he became editor of Avanti! (Forward!), the official daily newspaper of Italy’s Socialist Party. But he was expelled from the party two years later over his support for World War I. By 1919 a radically changed Mussolini had founded the fascist movement, which would later become the Fascist Party.")
1
@Faye_Liu Can you see that, bro☝️🤣
1
@Faye_Liu Astute observation! I was interested enough to bet myself and keep pushing him on my encounter in Danny's video haha😁, but looks like now I've seen enough of him and come with the same conclusion as yours, more or less. I guess I'm ready to move on and now he can do whatever grifts he likes, maybe until Danny start to notice his antics lol
1
I'll expand with a few examples to give you better idea. So, this is Bontang City, East Kalimantan https://youtu.be/LGgWcuX3-2k, statistically the 2nd richest city in Indonesia with per capita GDP of US$22,396 and US$66,291 as of 2021, respectively in nominal and PPP terms.
1
On the other hand, this is Panzhihua Prefecture-level City, Sichuan https://youtu.be/96ifZmBSljQ, which is ranked 63rd in China in term of GDP per capita as of 2020, with a sum of US$12,448 in nominal term or 20,340 in PPP term.
1
@user-ex7qx4pv2u I don't get what you're trying to ask here
1
@user-ex7qx4pv2u Then what's with the reply? You're making incoherent point and I don't get it.
1
@user-ex7qx4pv2u No, you just make yourself sounds like you need to read more from the dictionary. You knew I wasn't meant that, don't embarrass yourself here or piss somebody else off please?
1
@standingalone001 I think it should apply to the Taiwanese chipmakers too outside the One China principle. I'm not so sure, maybe the law hasn't taken into effects yet or Taiwan's unique political position allow them to exploit certain loopholes, or it's already going on behind the scenes. We don't know for sure, but I'm convinced both Japan and south Korea will likely become the most affected by this law.
1
@andresdavila1322 The point is that Castillo made a major mistake for not securing majority support, unlike Petro. If you care so much about "democracy" in Peru, that was what he had been doing all this time, don't you see? Making compromise with the opposition-controlled right wing congress (and parting from the party that gave him the political platform), literally allowing the obstructionist congress to abuse their illegal authority once more.
1
@PutXi_Whipped Lol, did you watch it and pretend he didn't say anything as such? Right from the start, he talks about how US is abandoning "Monroe Doctrine" thanks to Biden as China is growing stronger militarily every years.
1
@PutXi_Whipped So you just simply ignore the fact that Biden's been continuing Trump's anti-China policy and now you're pretending that's coming out of a thin air? You know people like Tucker is still quite an influence to US policymakers and that Biden's been following those voice and it's clear in his foreign policy? I said it already, you're being disingenuous here.
1
@PutXi_Whipped The reality is that Biden did nothing but continuing Trump's FP on China. Tucker remains the voice of reason and American policymakers are hearing him, all of his constant bloating about China and Biden is just a facade.
1
I think he's very an old-fashioned type, a vocal opponent of the empire. That's why he becomes an easy target, can't blame him much for that.
1
8:02 I think you can refer to it by alternative wording such as "the G-word conduct" or "G-word cleansing", anything to confuse the YT algo.
1
@rykwon4535 False equivalent, my friend. Nazi Germany managed to thrive off thanks to hyper privatization from American companies and bankers and similarly, the rest of Global South today are subject to privatization from foreign Western companies and banks as well. But here's my question: Southeast Asia is arguably one of the better-off "Western-privatized" region in the Global South, but which also reap benefits from close relation with China, a major country with ambivalent position between being a part of and an adversary of this so-called "globalist" corporate establishment (by your own logic). Now if we're taking your logic face value, does that mean that we Southeast Asia should also be opposed for supposedly enabling a condition for the "globalists" to prosper? That ASEAN, as it exist now, deserve to get conquered and dismantled like Nazi Germany, do you find it as totally sensible?
1
The current Argentina country under Javier Milei would be like if Redditstan or 4Chan Country was brought to life and "Milei-ing" all over the place. Truly one of the political moments of all time😌 Hopefully, his government will get whacked by the Argentine people in no more than a year👏
1
Wait, Part 6? Why did you leapfrog the series?
1
Idk who came up with this dichotomy but they got it so poorly worded and contextualized. It's all just capitalism in its truest sense, a primitive wealth accumulation which inevitably creates inequality and divide.
1
@WanderingExistence Well, I've watched the historicly short essay on national socialism for that matter. But even numerous mainstream sources also characterized German's economy at the time as a consolidated corporate-military state.
1
@WanderingExistence Sounds more like an excuse to deny the hard connection between extreme reactionary beliefs like N' 'zi and the z-word with the U' 'S long history of colonialism of the American continent, esp. the concept of Manifest Destiny itself but okay.
1
@fannyalbi9040 1973 ('73), it's in my reply already.
1
@fannyalbi9040 You're welcome 😁
1
@svenhanson398 Moreover, my study reference can be further verified with a first-hand account on the ground. From a foreigner who visited a middle school in Lhasa and witnessed Tibetans middle schoolers being taught of their own language, script and culture https://youtu.be/pSWaFsLgEpU
1
@Пыль глотаю Frankly, modern LaRouche Movements (quite surprisingly) are pretty slimy nut jobs. Having themselves attached politically to the mainland Chinese media and institution does seems to grant them enough political legitimacy they need. It's pretty alarming they're now building a new face of reactionary wave at home, not unlike the alt-right. But are more capable at concealing themselves under appropriation of leftist language and aesthetic. Should reminds you far more of certain "former WW2-era political legacy", I suppose.
1
Seeing Prof. Jeffrey Sachs appeases pro-Trump stances during a recent interview he had with Tucker Carlson, even under such a wishful thinking i.e. what he perceived as Trump's political pragmatism, is honestly unfortunate but somewhat also unsurprising at the end of the day. Trump admin's seemingly chaotic rhetorical posturing has proven to be quite effective at creating the necessary cognitive dissonance insofar, esp. among the impressionable US/Western folks in general.
1