Comments by "Demetrio Tozzi" (@PUARockstar) on "UsefulCharts" channel.

  1.  @Aeg0r  his name was Volodymer, not Vladimir. Moder Ukrainian counterpart name is Volodymyr. There was no such thing as russia yet, but it was a proto-Ukrainian state.
    4
  2.  @Zach-mw5so  except it's literally Kyiv written in the First Chronicle in times of Rus. Kiev - is modern russian name. Thanks for the love, but we Ukrainians insist on the right name in order of respect, especially since now, when russia tries to erase our whole identity, history, language, culture and statehood. They've launched assaust on Kyiv in the first days of the full-scale invasion. Kyiv it is. Out of love and respect, change.
    4
  3. It is of Volodymer and his brothers and sons.
    3
  4. Rus isn't russia.
    3
  5. Except we are. Also the Kingdom of Lithuania has Rus in its full name. Moscowites weren't know as Rus or rusyns. Delusional russians do not accept the truth that russia isn't Rus.
    3
  6.  @stormshadow5283  stop drinking and spreaking russian propaganda kool-aid, especially since everything that you're talking about is false.
    2
  7. We aren't even 100% sure if her ever existed.
    2
  8. No, it's most certainly not.
    2
  9.  @OCTAVIANVS_AVGVSTVS_CAESAR  there was no russia existing at that time. It was historically Ukrainian.
    2
  10.  @sael52  Rus isn't russia
    2
  11. Except we're not. F russia.
    1
  12. btw his actual name was Volodymer. Church style differed quite a bit at that point, and events that led to Great Schism have already started, so conversion was by proto-Orthodox.
    1
  13.  @Seft2_  no
    1
  14.  @ivanivanov1782  russia didn't existed yet*
    1
  15. Yes, of course, of Rus kings of Daniel line that precisely had Ukrainian and Polish offsprings. Also some rurikids went to modern Poland territory
    1
  16. Great videos, but original Nicene creed didn't have filioque you've showed in the text, so that would be the only nitpick but a major one. Vatican has the original, actually.
    1
  17.  @anonymousr1918  wrong
    1
  18. Watch the video carefully. Like king Daniel.
    1
  19. His entire existance even confirmed by any other source. Especially his account traveling from Novgorod to Kyiv, which isn't supported by archeological data.
    1
  20.  @IlyaUshar  Kyiv is written in Primary Chronicle. That's the name, not Kiev.
    1
  21. Учи историю, а не российские писульки-апокрифы. Про Ладогу и Новгород вообще смешно. Хотя бы российских археологов почитай по теме. Москва была столицей московского царства, а не Руси.
    1
  22. russian history narrative is a myth.
    1
  23.  @sael52  for many years terms Rus and Ukraine were used synonimically and interchengeablty by both outside and inside sources. Like in Hetmanate documents they were switching back and forth all the time.
    1
  24.  @clement7652  except when people from moscow tsardom traveled to Rus they were actually saying that. It's still in the written sources.
    1
  25.  @Aeg0r  but you fail to learn Ukrainian, your father language
    1
  26. with russia nothing in common* fixed you right there
    1
  27. This
    1
  28. I love this channel, thank you for this history of Ukraine video
    1