Youtube comments of DE Bradley (@darrenbradleytwin).

  1. 102
  2. 79
  3. 75
  4. 33
  5. 32
  6. 25
  7. 23
  8. 19
  9. 19
  10. 18
  11. 18
  12. 16
  13. 16
  14. 16
  15. 16
  16. 14
  17. 13
  18. 12
  19. 11
  20. 11
  21. 11
  22. 11
  23. 11
  24. 10
  25. 10
  26. 10
  27. 9
  28. 9
  29. 9
  30. 9
  31. 9
  32. 9
  33. 9
  34. 9
  35. 9
  36. 8
  37. 8
  38. 8
  39. 8
  40. 8
  41. 8
  42. 8
  43. 8
  44. 8
  45. 8
  46. 8
  47. 8
  48. 8
  49. 8
  50. 8
  51. 7
  52. 7
  53. 7
  54. 7
  55. 7
  56. 7
  57. 7
  58. What 'rights' are these trans activists after anyway apart from the rights they already have? Rights such as the 'right' to self-diagnose and have doctors and therapists agree with them and affirming a program for their 'patients'. No other group apart from trans people has this 'right' at the moment. They have the 'right' to have cosmetic surgeries paid for by tax payers dollars or health insurance. No other group apart from trans has this 'right' at the moment. Trans women have the 'right' who to compete against in their chosen sport, rather than to have categories and opponents determined for you by more objective sources designed to organise and moderate according to fairness. No one else has this 'right' in sports. Trans people have the 'right' to control how others view, think, speak of and include or exclude any member or organisation of society. No one else has this 'right'. The 'right' to stop people speaking and voicing their opinion, banning them from media, get them fired, or halt public events by accusing people of a difference of opinion ''hate speech'' against a 'minority group' you have not been born into but have made up and opted into by your own free will. No one else has this 'right'. The 'right' to decide that, in addition to the special 'rights' they demand for their group alone, they also get to erode the boundaries others have erected around their protected class groups as well and determine they belong in those groups too. No one else has this 'right'. The 'right' to demand that people like, immediately respect and speak well of them no matter how obnoxious their personality or how dubious their behaviour may be and accuse them of bigotry if they disagree with you in any way. No other group has this 'right'. The 'right' to indoctrinate other people's children into your ideology. No one else has this 'right'. The 'right' to consider behaviour that would otherwise be considered overtly sexual, adult and private and insist that it be publicly celebrated and modelled and paraded in front of children. No other group has this 'right'. The 'right' to infringe on other people's cultural and religious social norms and the boundaries that protect minority and immigrant groups' senses of modesty, sanctity, purity and safety according to their own cultural traditions. No other group has that 'right'. The 'right' to insist that language evolve, not in its normal, slow, organic fashion, such as gradual shifts in colloquialisms over decades, half-centuries or even centuries - but all at once, upon demand, no matter how counterintuitive , to impose onto others their changes in how other people use language. No one else has this 'right'.
    7
  59. 7
  60. 7
  61. 7
  62. Research my ass. If they had, they would know that he wasn't up there because he was a MP. Mr Coston was honoured for his great philanthropist work, building orphanages, building almhouses for the underprivileged, building hospitals for the poor that saved countless lives, building schools for the poor, setting up colleges and a university (the same university these idiots in the video probably attend). All out of his own pocket. He also set up over a dozen charities that still run to this very day raising thousands of pounds each year. THAT is why he was up there for the greatness he did for society. He wasn't a slave trader, he was a textile, fruits and wine trader, that is where he found his personal fortune. He was already born into money coming from a line of aristocracy, so away with your 'null' and disinformation. The slave traders were the African tribes leaders that offered Mr Colston their captive slaves (probably held in squalor) as a form of 'payment' (as they had done for thousands of years, it was their currency) for fully-laden ships worth tens of thousands of pounds of goods and merchandise. In a world where slavery was the norm in every part of the world, it would be madness for Mr Colston to give away his tens of thousands of pounds worth of goods away for free! Every civilisation from every corner of the globe was built on slavery. It was the norm. As normal as the internet is for us today. Rich people owned slaves and poor people wished they owned a slave. It's just the way the whole world was. What next, tear down The Great Pyramids or The Great Wall of China? Not to mention he was part of the body that regulated slave trading and their well-being. He fully deserved to be honoured for the amazing work he did for society. Thankfully, after a huge signed petition, the good people of Bristol have decided what they want and they want Mr Colston back in his rightful place. Common sense will always prevail.
    7
  63. 7
  64. 7
  65. @real gamer - You really don't know what you're talking about do you? Just like prostitution, slavery is the oldest 'occupation' on Earth. Black people had slaves among themselves long before Britons or Europeans set sail for Africa. The Pyramids in ancient Egypt were built by slaves over 3,000 years ago, long before any influences from Europe. African countries were built on slavery from their own people as slaves, they also traded slaves between other African countries as a form of payment between tribes. Slavery is not a European construct, you utter ignoramus. If you're going to talk a load of crap at someone, then at least make sure you know what you're taking about to save looking like a complete tool, you fool. People like 'that', well people like Colston made Bristol the place it is today, raised millions of pounds from his charities that are still going today and built a place of education for people to better themselves. That's why he has a statue and that is why it is going back up as the people of Bristol have signed that it should go back up and as far as I'm aware, that is what is planned. edit: And why a statue of Brown? He was late to the party after Britain abolished slavery long before the United States did and a British person such as Joseph Sturge, Thomas Clarkson, or William Wilberforce, would be more suited if we to have it your way... except that isn't going to happen as Colston is planned to be going back up after the restoration from a terrorist group.
    7
  66. 7
  67. ​ @realgamer4231  Stop perpetuating lies to feed your own narrative. I've collapsed your argument several times and now you're just looking for excuses so that you can't be in the wrong. It's as plain as day to see what you're trying to attempt but I'm afraid it doesn't wash with the informed. We are not to blame that black people still trade slaves to this day, just as we weren't to blame before we set foot in Africa. Who's refusing to acknowledge? I've got news for you pal, we acknowledged it over 180 years ago with the abolishment of it. Again, I'm not defending slavery, so you can get that out of your thick skull right now. You however are defending slavery by giving black people leniency for how they act today... because of us?! Gerrout of here! LOL Slaves in Britain were not chained and whipped, you've been watching too many movies. They had a role that they had to do unpaid work but that doesn't negate from the fact that they were also cared for, as in fed, clothed and sheltered and a damned-sight better than how they were treated in their own countries where food, water and shelter were prioritised to the tribesman and their leaders. That's not defending, that's looking at the realism. Was it right? Of course not (even though I've already said that already up above, so please, no more 'you're defending' schtick). Who said anything about genocide? You speak as though it was something that happened overnight. It was a long path to walk before we got to the genocide. Think outside the box for once in your life and ask yourself, how did they get to that point? What was the acorn in it all in 1933, the small steps, the genesis, that led to the eventual genocide, 10 years later. I get the feeling you're looking at bitesized history without looking at the nuances of it all in detail. You really do need to know what you're taking about if you're going to counter another person's knowledge on it.
    7
  68. Moving the goalposts to try and vindicate your nonsense LOL. You're delusional if you think only black people are treated unfairly by the police, a criminal is a criminal no matter what colour skin they are. If you give the police reason to treat you more harshly after arrest, then simply don't give them reason to do so, comply, it's that easy and you'll sail through the arrest. White people get treated badly by black supremacists too. It's horses for courses, apples and oranges. Who's this 'we' to blame? I'm not to blame. I didn't live or exist 200 years ago. Only a mentally ill person would think we are to blame. The only ones to blame for the hatred of white people are the racists themselves, they bring it upon themselves as they feel there has been an unjust, even though they weren't alive at that time. They are the hatemongering idiots, blind to see that the world has moved on from all of that, yet they perpetuate to become a TIV (Tendency for Interpersonal Victimhood) because they're a loser in life and so choose to lash out at someone to blame because they feel they should be entitled to something. No, a big NO! Do not blame me/'we' for any of this, they brought whatever misgivings they have upon themselves and it would seem that only the weak-minded fall for it. I have plenty of black friends who would set you straight with that one and snap you out of your dream world. Er, you were giving the black people of Africa a pass, it's all up there in your own words. We didn't make it worse, it was always bad for thousands of years before we even arrived there. Again, stop justifying slavery! The explorers, merchants and traders didn't take them as prisoners, the people who took then prisoners were the black tribes until they sold them. When they were sold they worked for no payment except for food, water, Western clothing and shelter. You talk about 'options'... where was the option before being captured and put into chains by the black tribes of Africa with probably no shelter and little food and water? It's no good talking about options when the horse has already bolted. How hard is for you to understand that it was the normal back then, the normal for thousands of years in every corner of the globe. I do have a right to say my opinion on them as it is my right to have free speech on it and if I say that they had a 'better' life over here as a slave, going from accounts, logs, diaries, paintings, etc. it would seem that that was the case. Hell, if I were a slave back then, I would sooner be working for an aristocracy in green and pleasant England with food, water, clothes and shelter, seeing and doing things that I never would have seen, some were even schooled for the art of conversation because of the 'exotic novelty' to the gentry, than being kept prisoner in chains in some cold, damp mud hut, eating scraps and left-overs. Please stop digging a hole for yourself as I really do not wish for you to expose your sanctimonious self anymore than you already have. Have some integrity for yourself for a change and move on, look forward to the future and build on it. Stop looking to the past to vindicate your lack of self-worth.
    7
  69. 7
  70. 7
  71. 7
  72. 7
  73. 7
  74. 7
  75. 7
  76. 7
  77. 7
  78. 7
  79. 7
  80. 7
  81. 7
  82. 7
  83. 7
  84. 6
  85. 6
  86. 6
  87. 6
  88. 6
  89. 6
  90. 6
  91. ​ @TinkerInTheShop  But you are alluding that it was Colston that initialised the slavery. Do you know what the currency of many African countries was hundreds of years ago? Animals and people, as it had done for millennia. What would you expect him to do, give away hundreds of thousands of pounds worth of goods away for nothing? In that case, leave your front door open at night with a sign saying, 'come inside free stuff'. The body he belonged was set up to regulate slavery, the same body that over a century, slowly came to abolish slavery. Again, you make it sound as though he was personally responsible for those numbers. That's your white privilege and right to not forgive him but I'm the better person than you and do forgive him as he couldn't help being born at a time when slavery was as normal as the internet is now. I know if I was a slave living in squalor in a hot cage or hut among my own people, baking in the hot African sun and freezing nights, being fed scraps with no sanitary system, and treated like a criminal (or I could be a criminal?!), a life in England working in the aristocracy in large posh houses as groundsmen, footmen, cleaners, waiters, whatever, with a room of my own, a bed, running clean water, fitted clothes instead of filthy rags, learning a skill or a trade... I think I would jump at the chance! Well if you ever go to Egypt or China, I hope you start chipping away at the Great Wall or Pyramids to erase them, yelling, 'I'll show 'em! Grrrrr!' smh
    6
  92. 6
  93. 6
  94. 6
  95. 6
  96. ​ @insecurecow4419  So what? No, he had a statue put up because he did all those great things I mentioned above, it wasn't put up because he happened to own a couple of slaves. That's what. Don't twist things to fit your own virtue signalling. He was a merchant, a philanthropist, a Member of Parliament, built schools, colleges, a university, hospitals, shelters for the homeless, not just in Bristol but London and other places around Britain. He set up over a dozen charities that still exist to this day that collectively raise millions of Pounds every year. A brilliant businessman who basically made Bristol the busy port it is today. That is why he is up there to celebrate the greatness he did. People have not wanted the statue taken down for years, it was just a bunch of plebs looking to blame the establishment because they love to play the victim. I bet before the BLM riots, those plebs walked past that statue every day without even knowing who he was, they just saw what was happening in the US and wanted some of that action over here because they're unhinged and like to play the victim because they feel entitled to something. The proof being that they vandalised it and tore it down without knowing the real reasons why he was up there in the first place. Blinkered by what the BLM riots were doing across the Atlantic which had no connection to the UK, their brains switched off and they behaved like a bunch of monkeys. You have been brainwashed by biased media. A media that never showed the 8-months non-stop BLM riots across the US. You've become a drone within a collective hive-mind of ignorance. You'll love the fact that the citizens of Bristol have overwhelmingly signed the petition for it to go back up and the council is in talks about it going back up where he rightfully belongs. 'People fed up with the city's BS'? Where are you getting this from? What 'BS' exactly? By 'people' you mean a tiny majority of student plebs (who ironically attend the university he set up, and most likely don't even come from Bristol) or fringe groups who have been indoctrinated by far-Left ideologies whom got caught up with the BS that came over from the United States because of some heavy-handed policing that just doesn't really happen here in the UK. Get real. The real people of Bristol have spoken and they want their founder back up and it looks like it will happen. But thank you for your most amusing reply. Have a nice day.
    6
  97. 6
  98. 6
  99. 6
  100. 6
  101. 6
  102. 6
  103. 6
  104. 6
  105. 6
  106. 6
  107. 6
  108. 6
  109. 6
  110. 6
  111. 6
  112. 6
  113. 6
  114. 6
  115. 6
  116. 6
  117. 6
  118. 6
  119. 6
  120. ​ @kimberlyporter9555  This is where a little research and knowledge comes into play so bear with me as it may be a little lengthy but I shall try to be as concise as possible for you to learn something. First of all, he wasn't a slave trader, his merchant trade was in textiles, wine and fruit. His acceptance of slaves as 'payment' from the slave traders of Africa for fully-laden ships of goods and merchandise worth tens if not hundreds of thousands of pounds (in today's inflation) was quite the norm for global economy for the time, just as it had been for thousands of years, long before Europeans set sail for uncharted lands, heck! long before an England even existed! Colston was a philanthropist and elected Member of Parliament. He set up over a dozen charities that still run to this day raising hundreds of thousands of pounds each year for underprivileged people, founded schools, almshouses, orphanages, churches and hospitals in Bristol, London and elsewhere saving thousands of lives, founded the Colston University in Bristol and basically made the busy port of Bristol what it is today. I'm glad the people of Bristol have shown their support for the great man and that there are plans for him to go back up where he rightfully belongs. The Bristolians did not want him taken down, it was just a bunch of plebs looking to blame the establishment because they love to play the victim. I bet before the BLM riots, those same plebs walked past that statue every day without even knowing who he was, they just saw what was happening in the US and wanted some of that action over here because they're unhinged and like to play the victim because they feel entitled to something. The proof being that they vandalised it and tore it down without knowing the real reasons, like yourself, why he was up there in the first place. Blinkered by what the Black Liberation Movement riots across the Atlantic which had no connection to the UK, their brains switched off and they behaved like a bunch of monkeys, brainwashed by biased media, becoming drones within a collective hive-mind of ignorance. A biased media that never showed and still don't show the continuing riots that have been going on for 12-months non-stop across the US. For example, Google Portland, Oregon. As for the loaded question asking, 'is it a case of white people feeling attacked for their racist views?' Of course not, it's all about common sense and greater knowledge prevailing and progressing us forward and honouring people and what they did for society and for the greater good. If you made it this far, I thank you for the return courtesy reading it as I have done writing it for you. edit: bold
    6
  121. ​ @kimberlyporter9555  Well then it's very wrong of you to accuse him of being a 'slave trader' without researching the proper facts and wading-in with 'racist twat' as that sort of practice is dangerous when applied to other living people. It's a good job he's passed away with that sort of misinformation being passed on. Those people who tore it down are not from Bristol, they're students from hundreds of miles away, studying in Bristol, Colston University, oh the irony! It's the people who actually live there that want it reinstated to its rightful place. It should be no shock to you that those plebs chose Colston to make a statement as you yourself made the same mistake as they did. A red mist descended and all you saw was 'racist' and 'white man'. Just because he happened to own a couple of slaves given to him by African slave traders which just happened to be normal business practice 300 years ago if African tribes and leaders had nothing else to offer in exchange for fully-laden ships. I dread to think what life must have been like for those slaves captured and enslaved by their own people, the living conditions for them must have been horrendous, chained, imprisoned, little to no shelter, unregular meals or scraps, no toilets, etc. Being a businessman, these slaves of his would have been under contract (by the governing body) until 'payment' had levelled out. I can't help think of the contrast working in aristocratic surroundings, some of those places were really grand, posher than posh. Shelter, a room to call their own, warmth, bedding, fitted clothing, meals on a normal daily basis, clean drinking water, clean sanitary conditions, with many learning a new language, how to read and write and above all learning a trade and a skill. It's no wonder when you hear that upon their contract release, that most of them stayed in the country and didn't want to go back to Africa as they saw a better life in the surroundings they had come accustomed to. There are lots of grey areas and nuances when looking back on history and usually they're the most interesting aspects of it.
    6
  122. 5
  123. 5
  124. 5
  125. 5
  126. 5
  127. 5
  128. 5
  129. 5
  130. 5
  131. 5
  132. 5
  133. 5
  134. 5
  135. 5
  136. 5
  137. 5
  138. 5
  139. 5
  140. 5
  141. 5
  142. 5
  143. 5
  144. 5
  145. 5
  146. 5
  147. 5
  148. 5
  149. 5
  150. 5
  151. 5
  152. 5
  153. 5
  154. 5
  155. 5
  156. 5
  157. 5
  158. 5
  159. 5
  160. 5
  161. 5
  162. 5
  163. 5
  164. 5
  165. 5
  166. 5
  167. 5
  168. 5
  169. 5
  170. 5
  171. 5
  172. 5
  173. 5
  174. 5
  175. 5
  176. 5
  177. 5
  178. 5
  179. 5
  180. 5
  181. 5
  182. 4
  183. 4
  184. 4
  185. 4
  186. 4
  187. 4
  188. 4
  189. 4
  190. 4
  191. 4
  192. 4
  193. 4
  194. 4
  195. 4
  196. 4
  197. 4
  198. 4
  199. 4
  200. 4
  201. 4
  202. 4
  203. 4
  204. 4
  205. 4
  206. 4
  207. 4
  208.  @realgamer4231  ​ Well then, thank you for proving to me that you are not prepared to learn about something properly. No wonder you don't know what you're talking about if you're not willing to put the brains in to read up on something to get the facts. Moving the goalposts again I see. Oh well, for what it's worth, black people are not treated any worse than white perpetrators. If you're going to be an asshole whilst in arrest, then expect to be treated accordingly. The figures may be higher because the crimes are higher from that demographic, it's all about logistics, stats and measurements, so of course the percentage will be higher as statistically they are involved in more crime and imprisoned more than any other demographic. Everything has a knock-on effect and unfortunately it is a detrimental one but they only have themselves to blame. Er, you were blaming 'we'/'us', it's up there in writing, so don't try and wriggle out of that one. What's to ignore about slavery when it was abolished over 180 years ago? What good is it bringing it up again and causing divisions with people. You know the Black Liberation Movement is a Marxist terrorist group, right? It likes to create chaos so it can 'rescue' you from it. You talk about 'fixing', what has the terrorist group 'fixed' exactly? I'll tell you, nothing. How would I feel as a black person walking through a park and seeing a statue of someone who did greatness (that's why they're up there) whom happened to live in a time when slavery existed? The answer is, I would shrug it off like any sane person would do because it has no impact on my personal life. If it was one of those street acts that pretends to be a statue and only whipped me and other black people with a whip as I walked by, then I'd have a problem. But you're (that's how you spell the correct contraction by the way) asking the wrong demographic, you should ask the 84% of black people who do not support BLM and the tearing down of great figureheads of history.
    4
  209. 4
  210. 4
  211. 4
  212. 4
  213. 4
  214. 4
  215. 4
  216. 4
  217. 4
  218. 4
  219. 4
  220. 4
  221. 4
  222. 4
  223. 4
  224. 4
  225. 4
  226. 4
  227. 4
  228. 4
  229. 4
  230. 4
  231. 4
  232. 4
  233. 4
  234. 4
  235. 4
  236. 4
  237. 4
  238. 4
  239. 4
  240. 4
  241. 4
  242. 4
  243. 4
  244. 4
  245. 4
  246. 4
  247. 4
  248. 3
  249. 3
  250. 3
  251. 3
  252. 3
  253. 3
  254. 3
  255. 3
  256. 3
  257. 3
  258. 3
  259. 3
  260. 3
  261. 3
  262. 3
  263. 3
  264. 3
  265. 3
  266. 3
  267. 3
  268. 3
  269. 3
  270. 3
  271. 3
  272. 3
  273. 3
  274. 3
  275. 3
  276. 3
  277. 3
  278. 3
  279. 3
  280. 3
  281. 3
  282. 3
  283. 3
  284. 3
  285. 3
  286. 3
  287. 3
  288. 3
  289. 3
  290. 3
  291. 3
  292. 3
  293. 3
  294. 3
  295. 3
  296. 3
  297. 3
  298. 3
  299. 3
  300. 3
  301. 3
  302. 3
  303. 3
  304. 3
  305. 3
  306. 3
  307. 3
  308. 3
  309. 3
  310. 3
  311. 3
  312. 3
  313. 3
  314. 3
  315. 3
  316. 3
  317. 3
  318. 3
  319. 3
  320. 3
  321. 3
  322. 3
  323. 3
  324. 3
  325. 3
  326. 2
  327. 2
  328. 2
  329. 2
  330. 2
  331. 2
  332. 2
  333. 2
  334. 2
  335. 2
  336. 2
  337. 2
  338. 2
  339. 2
  340. 2
  341. 2
  342. 2
  343. 2
  344. 2
  345. 2
  346. 2
  347. 2
  348. 2
  349. 2
  350. 2
  351. 2
  352. 2
  353. 2
  354. 2
  355. 2
  356. 2
  357. 2
  358. 2
  359. 2
  360. 2
  361. 2
  362. 2
  363. 2
  364. 2
  365. 2
  366. 2
  367. 2
  368. 2
  369. 2
  370. 2
  371. 2
  372. 2
  373. 2
  374. 2
  375. 2
  376. 2
  377. 2
  378. 2
  379. 2
  380. 2
  381. 2
  382. 2
  383. 2
  384. 2
  385. 2
  386. 2
  387. 2
  388. 2
  389. 2
  390. 2
  391. 2
  392. 2
  393. 2
  394. 2
  395. 2
  396. 2
  397. 2
  398. 2
  399. 2
  400. 2
  401. 2
  402. 2
  403. 2
  404. 2
  405. 2
  406. 2
  407. 2
  408. 2
  409. 2
  410. 2
  411. 2
  412. 2
  413. 2
  414. 2
  415. 2
  416. 2
  417. 2
  418. 2
  419. 2
  420. 2
  421. 2
  422. 2
  423. 2
  424. 2
  425. 2
  426. 2
  427. 2
  428. 2
  429. 2
  430. 2
  431. 2
  432. 2
  433. 2
  434. 2
  435. 2
  436. 2
  437. 2
  438. 2
  439. 2
  440. 2
  441. 2
  442. 2
  443. 2
  444. 2
  445. 2
  446. 2
  447. 2
  448. 2
  449. 2
  450. 2
  451. 2
  452. 2
  453. 2
  454. 2
  455. 2
  456. 2
  457. 2
  458. 2
  459. 2
  460. 2
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. ​ @Idiot Buster ​ They are indeed basically the same, which ever angle you look at it, it's autogynephilia. This fetish is defined as a male's propensity to be sexually aroused by the thought of himself as a female. It is the paraphilia that is theorized to underlie transvestism and (MtF) transsexualism. Now here's the crux, approx 80% of ‘transwomen’ are heterosexual men aroused by the idea of themselves as women. Most of their public support think they are still imagining an effeminate, post-op, passing transwoman. No progress can be made if they're picturing Hayley Cropper from Coronation Street. I ask these supporter if they really believe a man who has spent decades masturbating while wearing women's clothing is really a woman, the same as their own mother. And should he really be as entitled to access women's spaces as their mother/grandmother? Some supporters actaully come around and answer 'no', which restores some faith in our culture. Next comes the concept of the male 'lesbian'. All decent people are disgusted by this. Remember, they support trans rights because they think it's the next gay rights. You have to show them how wrong they are. You must show them how deeply homophobic the trans movement is. . Remind them these are heterosexual men with a fetish who believe themselves to be lesbians. I also point out that lesbians are being kicked off by these men from their own lesbian dating apps for stating that they only wish to date females, real lesbians only.
    1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. ​ @youtwat6525  We're not discussing your history here, it's about Edward Colston's history, something which you're obviously not familiar with, tbh The people of Bristol did not want it taken down, it was just a bunch of student plebs looking to blame the establishment because they love to play the victim. I bet before the BLM riots, those same plebs walked past that statue every day without even knowing who he was, they just saw what was happening in the United States and wanted some of that action over here because they're unhinged and like to play the victim because they feel entitled to something. The proof being that they vandalised it and tore it down without knowing the real reasons why he was up there in the first place. Blinkered by what the Black Liberation Movement riots across the Atlantic which had no connection to the UK, their brains switched off and they behaved like a bunch of monkeys, brainwashed by biased media, becoming drones within a collective hive-mind of ignorance. A media that has never showed the 12-months non-stop BLM riots across the US. Riots and destruction that still continue to this day. Over 2.5 billion dollars in damage and destruction across towns and cities. For example, just Google 'Portland riots' to see that it is still going on. The citizens of Bristol have overwhelmingly signed the petition for Colston to go back up and the council is in talks about it going back up where he rightfully belongs. The real people of Bristol have spoken and they want their founder back up and it looks like it will happen. That's why the people of Bristol want him reinstated, not because he owned a couple of slaves which was the norm for most people of his status at the time.
    1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556.  @WalterSBMBateman  You didn't answer my question about the race-swapping, are you okay with this? No the show never had 'strongly intertwined political themes', certainly not in the way the show is used for it today. If the stories in the 1960s and 70s did have a political backdrop to a story, then that's all there was to it, a canvas to paint an overriding character driven story with fantastical elements woven into a metaphorical or allegoric situation that could be reflectively compared to real-world current affairs. Analogies that would often give both sides of the situation which allowed the viewer to make up their own minds about the situation The show was never 'on-the-nose' as it is now and there-in lies the problem, it's no longer an impartial show on an impartial corporation. Whether you are right-wing, or left-wing, viewers should be advocating for an impartial one, which the people in this video are advocating. You trying to show me the door with, there are other cultural works as an escapism for me, then please, after being an avid fan of the show for over 40 years, meeting my heroes attending the 20th Anniversary at Longleat, an annual trip to Blackpool's Exhibition, mostly DW merchandise for Christmas and birthday presents throughout the 1980s from parents and relatives, attending countless conventions throughout the 1980s and 90s, even eventually organising my own 400-strong attendee conventions in the mid-90s... tell me, what other cultural works that I could turn to?
    1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1