Comments by "EvilGuacamoleGaming" (@EvilGuacamoleGaming) on "Washington Post" channel.

  1. 4
  2. 3
  3. 2
  4. @goku kaioken First, the law in Texas is not constitutional, so while it passed due to Texas having too many people who hate freedom and restricting the voting rights of everyone darker than tan or has a uterus, that doesn't make it reasonable. That said, Texas is about a decade from going blue. And that's only because of the new Jim Crow laws they are using. Being a 'majority rules' country does not mean destroying the rights of a minority. Well, I suppose in this country and certainly in Texas that has been the case, but it's not supposed to be. The disabled are a small portion of the population; do you want to get rid of handicap parking? Your rational is as ignorant as it is immoral. Utterly authoritarian. My concern is for everyone. I do not limit my compassion to those in my state. Where one person is oppressed we are all oppressed. It's like what Jesus said, what you do for the least of those among you you've done for me. I wish to save people from having to shove coat hangers in their vagina because they can't access safe abortions. A thing that is already happening. It would be against my religion to ignore the suffering happening in your state. But I digress. I suppose it's unfair to hold you to Christian standards since it does not seem you are one. The fact remains that this is a violation of bodily autonomy. To get to the point, yes, we make exceptions. You indeed could make exceptions for those who had contraceptives fail. At least on an ethical level you could agree but say it would not be provable in most cases so it's ineffective as law. BUT. That's not why you mention contraceptives. You are working under the assumption that pregnancy is some sort of punishment for sinful women that they should not cheat their way out of. Which is why you have no interest in an exception.
    1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1